Next Article in Journal
Exploring the Sensitivity of Prodromal Dementia with Lewy Bodies Research Criteria
Previous Article in Journal
Surface-Based Cortical Measures in Multimodal Association Brain Regions Predict Chess Expertise
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Theta Band (4–8 Hz) Oscillations Reflect Online Processing of Rhythm in Speech Production

Brain Sci. 2022, 12(12), 1593; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12121593
by Qin Yan 1,2,3 and Qingfang Zhang 1,2,3,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Brain Sci. 2022, 12(12), 1593; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12121593
Submission received: 18 October 2022 / Revised: 8 November 2022 / Accepted: 14 November 2022 / Published: 22 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Neurolinguistics)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This is indeed a very nice research about the processing of rhythm in speech production using Theta band of EEG signals. The paper is clear and the conclusions are supported by the reported results. I have found only a few issuses that should be addressed by the authors. 

1. You have used EEG term in introduction (page 3, line 135) without introducing it. 

2. I believe the authors can break the introduction into two sections. Introcution and liereature review. In this version, introduction is too long. 

3. Page 4, line 192 (1.4. the present study). Please use capital T for the. 

4. The authors are advised to make it more clear why AF3, AF4, F3, F4, F1, F2, Fz channels were selected for analysis. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

An introduction could have provided more information about the current study. This would have interested the reader in further reading.

The theoretical contribution of this article could be made more explicit. What gap is it intended to fill? 

Is 11 students really a sufficient number for study participants? Please clarify this in the 'Materials and methods' section.

In the Discussion section, there is no real connection between this study and the theoretical basis and results of other similar studies.

The Conclusions do not state the significance of this study, the limitations, the directions for further research.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The article can now be accepted for publication.

Back to TopTop