Next Article in Journal
Unsupervised Machine Learning to Identify Separable Clinical Alzheimer’s Disease Sub-Populations
Next Article in Special Issue
Development and Validation of a Long-Term 3D Glioblastoma Cell Culture in Alginate Microfibers as a Novel Bio-Mimicking Model System for Preclinical Drug Testing
Previous Article in Journal
The Difficult Integration between Human and Animal Studies on Emotional Lateralization: A Perspective Article
Previous Article in Special Issue
Pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Induce Oxidative Stress in Patient-Derived Glioblastoma Cells
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Brain Sciences
Volume 11
Issue 8
10.3390/brainsci11080976
brainsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Against the Resilience of High-Grade Gliomas: Gene Therapies (Part II)

by
Alice Giotta Lucifero
1 and
Sabino Luzzi
1,2,*
1
Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Clinical-Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
2
Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Brain Sci. 2021, 11(8), 976; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11080976
Submission received: 12 June 2021 / Revised: 12 July 2021 / Accepted: 19 July 2021 / Published: 23 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue At the Frontiers of Human Glioblastoma: Challenges in Introducing New Therapeutic Strategies)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Introduction: High-grade gliomas (HGGs) still have a high rate of recurrence and lethality. Gene therapies were projected to overcome the therapeutic resilience of HGGs, due to the intrinsic genetic heterogenicity and immune evasion pathways. The present literature review strives to provide an updated overview of the novel gene therapies for HGGs treatment, highlighting evidence from clinical trials, molecular mechanisms, and future perspectives. Methods: An extensive literature review was conducted through PubMed/Medline and ClinicalTrials.gov databases, using the keywords “high-grade glioma,” “glioblastoma,” and “malignant brain tumor”, combined with “gene therapy,” “oncolytic viruses,” “suicide gene therapies,” “tumor suppressor genes,” “immunomodulatory genes,” and “gene target therapies”. Only articles in English and published in the last 15 years were chosen, further screened based on best relevance. Data were analyzed and described according to the PRISMA guidelines. Results: Viruses were the most vehicles employed for their feasibility and transduction efficiency. Apart from liposomes, other viral vehicles remain largely still experimental. Oncolytic viruses and suicide gene therapies proved great results in phase I, II preclinical, and clinical trials. Tumor suppressor, immunomodulatory, and target genes were widely tested, showing encouraging results especially for recurrent HGGs. Conclusions: Oncolytic virotherapy and suicide genes strategies are valuable second-line treatment options for relapsing HGGs. Immunomodulatory approaches, tumor suppressor, and target genes therapies may implement and upgrade standard chemoradiotherapy. Future research aims to improve safety profile and prolonging therapeutic effectiveness. Further clinical trials are needed to assess the efficacy of gene-based therapies.

1. Introduction

High-grade gliomas (HGGs) are deadly brain tumors accounting for 70% of all central nervous system neoplasms [1,2,3], and the optimization of their management is among the most demanding challenging of the modern neuro-oncology. The reasons for their resilience toward treatment strategies depend on the high cell turnover, pathological neoangiogenesis, and genetic landscape heterogenicity [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. Established guidelines include gross total surgical resection followed by adjuvant chemoradiotherapy [12,13]. In the effort to improve the prognosis of these tumors, characterized by a median survival of only 12–15 months [14,15,16,17], those treatment options considered as “standard of care” have been recently augmented with newer tailored and immune-based technologies. Recent advances in genetic, nanotechnologies, biotechnologies, and translational medicine provided the means for the development of more sophisticated approaches, including gene therapies which have polarized growing attention during the last few years [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26].
Gene therapies aim to transfer manipulated genetic payload to glioma cells via engineered vectors resulting in genome rearrangement, oncolysis, and tumor regression [27,28,29,30,31,32,33]. The goal of the present study is to overview the landscape of gene therapies for HGGs focusing on vectors’ engineering, oncolytic mechanisms, and clinical trials. Limitations and future perspectives of the gene-based approach are also discussed.

2. Methods

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used to perform a comprehensive online systematic literature review. PubMed/Medline (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, accessed on 1 April 2021) and ClinicalTrials.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov, accessed on 30 January 2021) databases were employed, combined with Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms and words text. The MeSH terms and keywords were “high-grade glioma,” “glioblastoma,” and “malignant brain tumor”, merged with “gene therapy,” “oncolytic viruses,” “suicide gene therapies,” “tumor suppressor gene therapies,” “immunomodulatory gene therapies,” and “gene target therapies” to limit the research to the innovative therapies of gene delivery.
English language, or translated, and publication date back to the last 15 years were the eligibility criteria. Systematic reviews and editorials were included and further screened based on the best match and relevance.
On the ClinicalTrials.gov database, the search words were “high-grade glioma”, “glioblastoma”, “malignant brain tumor”, “gene therapies”, and “oncolytic viruses”. Interventional studies and clinical trials were chosen without restrictions for phase or recruitment status. Studies about gene therapies for malignant brain gliomas were finally selected. An overview of the classification criteria, vectors, therapeutic principles, and pharmacological agents was conducted.
The inclusion and exclusion criteria applied in the systematic literature review are described in Table 1.

3. Results

The review returned a total of 201 articles and 97 clinical trials. After duplicates removal and application of the exclusion criteria, a total of 99 articles and 60 clinical trials were considered for eligibility. Figure 1 shows the PRISMA flow chart.

3.1. Vectors

The gene therapy feasibility is guaranteed by engineered vectors, viral or non-viral, able to deliver genetic material into target cells [30,31]. Viral vectors are non-toxic purified viruses designed to transfer genetic payload without triggering the infection [34]. Two types of viral carriers are now clinically approved: the replication-competent and -incompetent viruses. The formers are mutated viral agents which maintain the self-replication ability, transinfect tumor cells inducing lysis. The replication-incompetent ones are genome-deleted viruses with reduced toxicity [35,36].
Recently advanced nanotechnologies made possible the design of nanoparticles, micron-sized molecules, suitable as non-viral carriers with low toxicity and immunogenicity [37]. Nanoparticles include liposomes and polymers, which pass through the blood-brain barrier and cross the tumor cell membrane via endocytosis. Liposomes are lipid vesicles which load electrostatically DNA and RNA plasmid and transfer genes to target cells. Polymers are macromolecules which directly bind DNA and include nucleotides into the tumor cells genome. The polyethyleneimine (PEI), a linear polymer, was widely tested, frequently combined with polyethylene glycol (PEG) or β-cyclodextrin to improve biodistribution and increasing tumor targeting [38,39,40,41]. The polymer polyamidoamine (PAMAM) was also employed in delivering therapeutic genes to glioma cells [42,43].
Moreover, iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs), enriched with PEG or PEI, were used as genetic carriers, allowing them to be displayed in magnetic resonance imaging [44,45]. Table 2 presents a comparison between viral and non-viral carriers.

3.2. Classification of Gene Therapies for High-Grade Glioma

Gene therapies can be categorized based on molecular mechanisms, carriers involved, and therapeutic gene transferred. The most promising strategies include the replication-competent oncolytic viruses (OVs), suicide gene therapy, tumor suppressor gene delivery, immunomodulatory strategies, and gene target therapies. Table 3 reports the classification of gene therapies for HGGs.

3.2.1. Oncolytic Virotherapy

OVs are designed to selectively infect tumor cells, self-replicate, and induce apoptosis [46,47,48]. Oncolytic herpes simplex virus (oHSV), conditionally replicating adenovirus (CRAd), measles paramyxovirus (MV), and recombinant non-pathogenic poliorhinovirus (PVS-RIPO) are under evaluation for HGGs treatment (Figure 2).

oHSVs

oHSVs are double-stranded DNA viruses, attenuated through the inactivation of the unique long (UL) 39 gene, which encodes the ribonucleotide reductase (ICP6), and the deletion of protein synthesis-promoting factors (γ34.5) [49,50].
The oHSV1716, the first generation oHSV, was devoid of both γ34.5 copies. oHSV1716 was tested in several clinical trials, showing good results as an adjuvant agent for HGGs treatment. In 2000, Rampling et al. evaluated the toxicity of oHSV1716 after intratumoral inoculation. They treated nine patients affected by relapsing HGGs showing a good safety profile [51]. In 2002, Papanastassiou et al. administered 1 × 105 plaque-forming units (PFUs) of oHSV1716 to 12 patients with recurrent HGGs and, 9 days after the inoculation, tumors were surgically removed. Histological findings demonstrated the active intratumoral viral replication [52]. oHSV1716 was also employed in phase II clinical trial for HGGs treatment, combined with dexamethasone and surgery (#NCT02031965). Despite the good tolerance, the major weakness of this strategy lies in the deletion of γ34.5, which reduces viral activity and efficacy [53].
The oHSVG207, deleted γ34.5 and inactivated ICP6, was employed in a phase I clinical trial which reported radiological evidence of antitumor activity in 21 patients and an excellent safety profile (dose 3 × 109 PFU) [54]. Nine years later, the same group tested the injection of oHSVG207 directly in surgical cavities after surgery, as adjuvant therapy. Histology confirms viral replication activity and radiologic evidence proved the antitumor activity [55]. Several phases I, and I/II clinical trials employed the HSVG207, locally administered, as a single agent or in combination with radiation therapy. Results showed few side effects, a synergic effect with concurrent radiotherapy, but the efficacy is still limited (#NCT00028158, # NCT03911388, #NCT00157703, # NCT02457845).
The mutant HSV (rQNestin34.5) and M032, new generation oHSVs, were tested in two phases I clinical trials, showing relevant oncolytic activity against HGGs (#NCT03152318, # NCT02062827).

CRAd

CRAds are non-enveloped DNA adenovirus engineered by the removal of E1A-B genes, which inhibit the binding to the retinoblastoma protein (pRB) and p53, respectively, and block infected cell apoptosis.
The ONYX-015, modified with deletion of E1B genes, selectively targets tumor cells with aberrant p53 pathways [56]. A phase I clinical study employed the ONYX-015 with a dose-escalation protocol. It was injected into the surgical cavity after removal of 24 HGGs (dose from 1 × 107 to 1 × 1010 PFUs). No side effects were registered, but the progression-free survival (PFS) rate was only 46 days, and overall survival (OS) of 6 months [57]. A phase I clinical trial evaluated the combination of ONYX-015 with cisplatin and fluorouracil, as adjuvant therapy after surgical removal (#NCT00006106). The study showed good tolerance to the OVs, but the treatment efficacy was still not significant.
DNX-2401 (Ad5Delta24) deleted in the E1A gene, selectively target glioma cells harboring pRb pathways mutations [58]. In 2018, Lang and colleagues treated 37 patients with relapsed HGGs with intratumoral injection of DNX-2401. Patients were stratified into two groups, the first received a single dose, the second was treated by resection followed by the inoculation of DNX-2401 in the surgical cavity. The median OS was of 9.5 months and 13.0 months for the group 1 and 2, respectively (#NCT00805376) [59]. Several phase I trials tested the intratumoral inoculation of DNX-2401 with temozolomide (#NCT01956734), interferon-γ (INFγ) (#NCT02197169). In 2017, at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting I, Lang and colleagues presented the results of their clinical study (#NCT02197169) on 27 enrolled patients affected by recurrent HGGs, of which nine were treated with DNX-2401 as monotherapy and 18 with DNX-2401 and INFγ. The 12-month OS was 33% and 18-month was OS was 22% in both groups, independently from the type of treatment.
Despite encouraging results in volumetric tumor reduction with single DNX-2401/INFγ administration, no significant difference in survival was reported between the two groups [60].
An active phase II trial is studying the combination of intratumoral DNX-2401 and adjuvant systemic pembrolizumab for HGGs treatment of 49 patients with malignant brain tumors (#NCT02798406). An ongoing phase I trial is evaluating the efficacy of DNX-2401 after conventional surgery (#NCT03896568).
DNX-2440, the mutant variant of DNX-2401, was engineered with the insertion of the OX40 ligand gene. The OX40, expressed on glioma cells, boosts the antitumoral immune response. DNX-2440 is currently under evaluation for HGGs treatment (#NCT03714334).

MV

MV, an enveloped RNA virus, exhibits the mutated hemagglutinin envelope glycoprotein H, also known as Edmonston strain, which selectively targets the CD46 on glioma cells [61,62]. MV was engineered to express the circulating carcinogenic embryonic antigen (CEA), useful to assess the virus replication and oncolytic activity [63]. A phase I study tested the toxicity of MV-CEA association and no severe side effects were reported (#NCT00390299) [64]. MV was also designed to express interleukin-13 (IL-13) directed to the IL-13Rα2 receptor on glioblastoma (GBM) cells, or the single-chain antibody versus the vIII variant of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFRvIII) [65,66,67].

PVS-RIPO

PVS-RIPO is an attenuated Sabin poliovirus engineered by the replacement of the internal ribosomal entry site (IRES) with the IRES from a human rhinovirus, to reduce the viral neuropathogenicity [68,69,70]. The tropism of PVS-RIPO for tumor cells is determined by the poliovirus receptor CD155, expressed on HGGs cells [71,72].
PVS-RIPO was tested for treatment of pediatric (#NCT03043391) and adult recurrent HGGs as monotherapy, in combination with a single-cycle of lomustine (#NCT02986178), or with the anti-PDL1 antibody atezolizumab (NCT03973879). Results from the aforementioned clinical trials showed a sufficient anticancer efficacy, but a low safety profile.
Table 4 reports a comprehensive summary of clinical trials on oncolytic virotherapy for HGGs.

3.2.2. Suicide Gene Therapies

The suicide gene strategy is grounded on the viral transfer of “suicide genes” to target cells, which encode for enzymes able to convert prodrug to active compound [73,74]. The inactive prodrug is administered systematically and activated at the tumor site by the suicide enzymes, resulting in oncolytic effect and tumor cell apoptosis [75]. For HGGs treatment, the suicide transgene evaluated in clinical and preclinical studies are as follows: herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase (HSV-TK), cytosine deaminase (CD), and E. coli-derived purine nucleoside phosphorylase (PNP) (Figure 3).

HSV-TK

The HSV-TK enzyme catalyzes the monophosphorylation of the ganciclovir/valacyclovir, which is after triphosphorylates and activates intracellular kinases. The active drug blocks the S-phase and arrests the cell circle, leading to inhibition of DNA synthesis and tumor lysis [76,77,78,79].
In 2000, the phase III clinical study piloted by Rainov and colleagues tested the effect of HSV-TK gene therapy for 248 patients with newly diagnosed HGGs. Patients received an intratumoral inoculation of retroviral HSV-TK, followed by standard surgery, radiation therapy, and systemic administration of ganciclovir for 2 weeks. The study group was compared to the control one (conventional surgery and radiotherapy) and not significant differences in PFS and OS were founded [80]. Two recruiting phase I/II clinical trials tested the HSV-TK combined with replication-defective adenoviral vector (ADV/HSV-TK) and administered with valacyclovir (#NCT03603405, #NCT03596086). Results demonstrated the safety of this strategy with promising antitumoral efficacy. In 2000, Sandmair et al. conducted a phase I clinical trial intending to prove the efficacy and transinfection efficiency of replication-defective retrovirus or adenovirus-mediated HSV-TK/ganciclovir. 21 patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent HGGs were recruited, divided in two groups, and treated with retrovirus or adenoviruses. The OS of the adenovirus-mediated strategy was much higher [81]. Germano and colleagues tested the same ADV/HSV-TK strategy in a phase I trial and results showed a PFS of 112 weeks and an OS of 248 weeks [82]. In 2008, the ASPECT phase III clinical trial studied the ADV/HSV-TK for HGGs treatment. Out of 236 patients recruited who underwent surgical resection, 119 were randomized for the inoculation of ADV/HSV-TK locally at the tumor cavity, followed by systemic ganciclovir for two weeks. The PFS rates were 268 days and 308 days, and OS were 452 days and 497 days for the study group compared to the control one, respectively [83]. In 2016, Wheeler et al. enrolled 48 patients, harboring newly diagnosed HGGs, treated with ADV/HSV-TK and postoperative intravenously valacyclovir. This group was compared to the control one, treated with conventional surgery and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The PFS rate was 8 months for the study group and 6.5 months for the control one; the OS was 17 versus 13.5 months for the study and the control group, respectively (#NCT00589875). Results demonstrated the greatest effectiveness in the use of AD as the carrier for HSV-TK gene therapy.
An active phase I trial is evaluating a combined innovative approach, exploiting ADV/HSV-TK and the prodrug valacyclovir, associated with a checkpoint inhibitor (nivolumab), chemotherapy (temozolomide), and conventional radiation, to evaluate the safety profile and achievability of this enhanced strategy (#NCT03576612).

CD

The bacterial enzyme CD catalyzes the activation of the prodrug 5-fluorocytosine (5-FC) in oncolytic 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), selectively in glioma cells [28,84,85]. Toca 511, a replication-competent retrovirus, loads the CD and transinfect tumor cells. It promotes the expression of CD, which active the 5-FU, able to irreversibly blocks DNA synthesis and leads to cell apoptosis [86].
From 2016, Cloughesy and his group employed the Toca 511/5-FC in two clinical trials. The first one (#NCT01156584) tested the Toca 511 via stereotactic transcranial injection or intravenously injection [87]. In the subsequent study (#NCT01470794), they administered Toca 511 in the surgical cavity with a subsequent administration of Toca FC antifungal agent. Patients affected by recurrent or progressive HGGs were enrolled, and results showed a good safety profile and a median OS of 12–14 months [86]. Despite these initial encouraging results, Cloughesy et al. 2019 designed a phase III study which reported the therapeutic failure of Toca 511/5-FC, compared to the standard of care, in 271 patients with recurrent HGGs (#NCT02414165).

PNP

The E. coli-derived PNP converts adenosine ribonucleosides, as the fludarabine, in the active adenine compound, namely the 2-fluoroadenine. It interferes with RNA replication and cell cycle [88,89]. PNP, delivered with HSV or retrovirus vehicles, showed good long-term efficacy in preclinical models for malignant tumors treatment [90,91,92,93,94].
Moreover, the co-administration of antibiotic therapy, which suppresses the intestinal flora, could overactivated the PNP gene therapy intensifying the prodrug conversion [95,96]. Table 5 reports a comprehensive summary of clinical trials on suicide gene therapies for HGGs.

3.2.3. Tumor Suppressor Gene Therapies

Oncogenesis predicts the loss of the physiological regulatory function of some tumor suppressor genes which control the cell cycle and death. HGGs harbor deletions and mutations of specific tumor suppressors, more frequently the p53, p16, and phosphatase and tensin homologue (PTEN) [97]. The goal of tumor suppressor gene strategies is to transfer antitumoral functional genes to glioma cells, in order to restore normal function (Figure 4).

p53

The TP53 is the most common suppressor gene which codifies for p53 protein, fundamental in cell replication and apoptosis, found mutated in more than 50% of HGGs, 30% newly diagnosed, and 70% relapsed [98,99]. P53 is involved in angiogenesis inhibition and DNA repairing mechanisms.
The most accredited strategy includes the replication-deficient adenovirus in which the E1 gene is replaced by the wild-type p53 and conveyed by a cytomegalovirus promoter (Ad5CMV-p53). E1 deletion makes the virus unable to activate the infectious process, while the CMV promoter increases p53 gene expression [30,100,101]. Ad5CMV-p53 proved to block the glioma cell cycle, inhibit angiogenesis, and induce tumor apoptosis in many preclinical trials. [100,102,103,104,105,106]. In 1998, Badie et al. tested the efficacy of Ad-mediated p53 gene therapy, combined with radiation, in p53-mutant rat glioma models. Results showed 85% of tumor cell apoptosis in 24 h [107]. Later, Cirielli and his group studied the transfer of AdCMVp53 in human intracranial HGG cells in mice. 100 days after treatment all rats survived [103]. Another preclinical experimental study was conducted, in 2014, by Kim and colleagues. They designed a nanodelivery system able to carry the p53 gene into glioma cells through the blood-brain barrier. They reported a high rate of tumor suppression in GBM xenograft mice [108].
As regards clinical studies, two completed phase I trials employed the Ad5CMV-p53 as neo- and adjuvant therapy for relapsing HGGs. In both studies, patients received a preoperative intratumoral stereotactic inoculation of Ad5CMV-p53, followed by conventional surgery. Afterward, Ad5CMV-p53 was directly injected several times into the tumor cavity walls. Results showed a PFS of 13 weeks and OS of 44 weeks (#NCT00004041, #NCT00004080). A phase I clinical trial tested the efficacy and safety profile of Ad-p53 for HGGs treatment. 15 patients were enrolled and preoperatively treated with a stereotactic injection of Ad-p53 through an implanted catheter. After surgical gross total removal, Ad-p53 was injected several times in the surgical cavity. Treatment demonstrated low toxicity, but still limited efficacy [105].

p16

p16 controls the cell cycle arrest at the G1-S transition, avoiding uncontrolled replication and oncogenesis [109]. Restoration of p16 function, via adenoviral carrier, shown to inhibit glioma growth and locoregional diffusion, also blocking the activity of matrix metalloproteases in the glioma microenvironment [110]. In 1997 Chintala et al. tried to restore in vitro the p16 activity in HGGs cells, through Matrigel-coated transwell inserts and fetal rat-brain aggregates, by recombinant replication-deficient adenovirus. All tests showed a substantial reduction in glioma cell replication activity and a decrease in the expression of tumor microenvironment enzymes [110]. In 2000, Hung et al. tested the injection of a retrovirus, encoding the human p16 gene, in 10 rat HGG models. Results demonstrated the inhibition of glioma cell growth [111]. In 2003, Hama and colleagues examined the interaction between p16 and radiation-induced cell death. p16-null human glioma cell lines were induced to phase G1 of the cell cycle, by means of the adenovirus-mediated p16 gene. Data suggested that p16 expression is related to tumor radiosensitive via mechanisms of abnormal nucleation in HGG cells [112]. It is relevant that the effectiveness of the p16 gene strategy is only possible if the pRB activity is preserved [113].

PTEN

PTEN was found mutated in about 45% of HGGs and is involved in tumor microenvironment maintenance and proangiogenetic pathways [114,115]. Adenoviral delivery of the PTEN gene has been demonstrated to inhibit glioma proliferation and promote oncolysis [116,117,118,119]. In 1998, Cheney and colleagues designed a replication-defective adenovirus to transfer the PTEN gene in nude mice tumors. Results supported the tumor suppression activity of PTEN expression in HGGs [117]. Furthermore, as demonstrated by Davies and his group, PTEN inhibits Akt kinase activity, resulting in glioma cell death [116]. In vivo experiments, conducted by Abe and Lu, proved the adenoviral expression of PTEN able to block the angiogenetic processes and tumor proliferation in glioma cells [118,119]. In 2011, Inaba et al. demonstrated that the transmission of the PTEN gene into glioma cells, by an adenoviral vector, increased the tumor sensitivity to temozolomide and radiotherapy [120]. Table 6 presents the clinical trials on tumor suppressor gene therapies for HGGs.

3.2.4. Immunomodulatory Gene Therapies

HGGs resistance to standard treatments resides in the immune-escape tumor mechanisms and immunosuppressor tumor microenvironment. Immunomodulatory gene strategies are designed to implement the immune response against glioma by means of delivery of genes which encode for immunostimulatory cytokines and IFNβ/γ [48,85,121,122]. (Figure 5).

IFN-β/γ

Adenoviral-IFN-β gene delivery was tested in many preclinical and clinical trials [123,124,125,126,127,128,129]. In 2001, Qin et al. employed adenovirus expressing IFN-β in both in vivo and ex vivo human glioma xenografts in mouses. Results showed a potential antitumoral activity with the activation of NK cells and macrophages [123]. In phase I clinical study the drug was stereotactically inoculated into glioma before surgery. Results supported the activation of immune cascade and T and NK cells recruitment in the tumor microenvironment (#NCT00031083).
Nanoparticles and liposomes were also employed for INF- β transfer. From 1999, Natsume et al. conducted in vivo experiments using murine INF-β gene directly injected via liposomes in brain gliomas in mice. Results showed in 40% of cases the total inhibition of glioma growth with a strong antitumoral T lymphocyte infiltration [124]. Moreover, the same group carried on another study with the aim to deepen the role of tumor-specific lymphocytes. Mice were re-treated with a subcutaneous or intracranial injection of glioma cells and no tumor evidence was found 50 days later. This data proved that, in addition to the anticancer effects of INF-β, the local immune response has a role in long-term antitumor efficacy [125]. In 2004, Yoshida and colleagues tested the treatment with liposome/INF-β in a clinical trial, involving five patients with HGG. Four of these experienced a total or partial response to treatment with radiological evidence of volumetric glioma reduction by 50% and concomitant low toxicity [126]. Histological findings reported a high level of immune activation, also [127].
IFN-γ has the role of reducing cancer cell proliferation and interaction with the extracellular matrix [128]. IFN-γ as monotherapy was proved to be less effective, so combination protocols are under evaluation [129]. In 2002, Ehtesham and colleagues tested the efficacy of adenoviral-mediated IFN-γ and TNF-α gene transfer in HGGs cells. They proved the antitumoral efficacy of this treatment in mice models, also highlighting local increased recruitment of lymphocytes [130].
Furthermore, parvoviruses were engineered as vehicles of IFN-γ inducible protein 10 (CXCL10) and TNF-α, showing a synergic effect in tumor regression in rats HGGs models [131].

IL12/4/2

Among the immunostimulant cytokines, IL12 has a paramount role in boosting the immune cascade and recruiting cytotoxic lymphocytes at the tumor microenvironment [132,133,134].
Earlier phase studies employed non-replicating adenoviruses and HSV for delivery of IL12 to malignant glioma cells [135,136,137]. In 2012, Chiu et al. tested the intracranial injection of recombinant adeno-associated virus expressing IL12 gene (rAAV2/IL12) in the glioma mice model [135]. Later that year, Markert et al. studied the efficacy and security of γ34.5-deleted HSV1, encoding the IL12 gene, for malignant glioma treatment in rats [137]. Results of both preclinical studies showed tumor cell apoptosis, infiltration of active microglia cells, good safety profile, and strong local immune reaction.
Two recruiting phase I clinical trials tested the inducible adenoviral vector engineered to express IL12 (Ad-RTS- hIL12) with the oral vedelimex (an IL12 immunotherapeutic activator) for adult and pediatric gliomas (#NCT02026271, #NCT03330197). These studies revealed an intense upregulation of antitumor infiltrating lymphocytes.
IL4, secreted by lymphocytes, upregulates the immune cascade and B and T cells enrollment [138,139,140]. In clinical and preclinical models, the IL4 gene was virally transduced as an immunomodulatory agent for HGGs treatment. Yu and colleagues experienced the antitumoral activity of IL4, which was administered to 12 nude mice affected by gliomas. The treatment resulted in significant inhibition of glioma cell growth [138]. Okada and his group conducted clinical studies to test a vaccine constituted of IL-4-HSV-TK gene-modified autologous glioma cells, followed by systemic ganciclovir administration. Patients enrolled harbored recurrent/refractory supratentorial malignant glioma. The aim was to evaluate the safety profile, clinical efficacy, and immune response. Results reported good antitumoral activity and a strong antitumoral peripheral immunization [140].
Moreover, in 2005, Colombo et al. tested the intratumoral injection of retroviruses expressing both HSV-TK and IL2 genes, followed by intravenous ganciclovir, for treatment of 12 patients with recurrent HGGs. Few side effects were reported, and the 12 months PFS and OS was of 14% and 35%, respectively [141].
Table 7 summarizes the clinical trials on immunomodulatory gene therapies for HGGs.

3.2.5. Gene Target Therapies

The identification of specific molecular markers of HGGs allowed the development of gene target therapies, designed to directly bind specific tumor antigens, with the aim to irreversibly block oncogenic pathways. Most of these strategies are still experimental and no active clinical trials are underway (Figure 6).

EGFRvIII

EGFRvIII variant, found in 30% of HGGs, is involved in mechanisms of oncogenesis and tumor progression [142,143]. Viral vectors and nanoparticles were engineered to transfer antisense or small interfering RNA directed specifically against the TK domain of glioma EGFRvIII. Several studies demonstrated a significant tumor volume reduction after treatment [144,145,146,147]. In 2006, Kang and colleagues projected antisense-RNA and small interference RNA (siRNA) expressing antisense EGFR genes which selectively bind the TK domain of EGFRvIII. After inoculation, glioma cell growth was amply reduced in vitro and in vivo models [145]. Shir and Levitzki tested antisense-RNA, transduced via viral and non-viral carriers, able to activate dependent protein kinase PKR. PKR induces cancer cell death targeting EGFRvIII in intracranial glioma xenografts [144]. In 2005, Padfield et al. confirmed the role of adjuvant miRNA therapies as promising strategies in glioma treatment. In fact, miR-7 showed high efficacy in blocking directly the EGFR pathways and downregulate MAPK/PI3K/Akt signaling, resulting in tumor cell apoptosis [148]. The cyclodextrin-modified dendritic polyamine complexes (DexAMs) were employed in the delivery of EGFRvIII siRNA and showed promising results in malignant glioma cells, also in combination with erlotinib [149].

VEGF/VEGFR

The vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was found overexpressed in many malignant tumors. Adenoviral vector, loaded with anti-sense cDNA VEGF (Ad5CMV-αVEGF), was subcutaneously injected in nude mice previously infected with human glioma cells, resulting in inhibition of tumor spreading [150]. In xenografts, the direct intratumoral inoculation of PEI/VEGF siRNA showed an antiangiogenetic strong effect [151]. In 2007, Yoo and colleagues tested an oncolytic adenovirus (Ad)-based short hairpin RNA (shRNA) expression system (Ad-DeltaB7-shVEGF) directed versus the VEGF. Ad-DeltaB7-shVEGF showed high antiangiogenetic activity in the matrigel plug assay, and greater bioavailability compared to replication-incompetent adenoviruses [152]. The oncolytic adenovirus Ad-DeltaB7, was also employed in a preclinical study by Kang et al. in 2008. They designed an adenovirus able to express the transcriptional repressor Cys2-His2 zinc-finger proteins, F435-KOX, directed versus the VEGF promoter (Ad-DeltaB7-KOX). Ad-DeltaB7-KOX demonstrated high antitumor activity in a human xenografted glioma model [153].
In addition, the strategy of antagonizing the VEGF receptor (VEGFR) has proven to be effective. In 2004, Heidenreich et al. tried to inhibit the VEGFR-2 signaling pathway through transfers of a mutant-VEGFR via a retrovirus. The lack of intracellular tyrosine kinase domain in the engineered mutant-VEGFR resulted in inhibition of angiogenesis and progression in the xenografted glioma model [154]. A further study tested the coinfection of HGGs with adenovirus expressing VEGFR and an oncolytic virus dl922/947. This combined treatment resulted in more effectiveness than monotherapy [155].

4. Discussion

The present literature review aims to outline the up-to-date gene therapies for HGGs treatment, focusing especially on the molecular mechanisms, vectors, and therapeutic genes employed.
The rationale of gene strategies lies in the reprogramming of the glioma genome, intending to induce oncolysis or the expression of the antitumoral mediators. Manufactured genes are transferred to target cells through specific carriers, engineered to selectively bind cancer cells. Viral carriers were the first vehicle used, because of their specific neurotropism, and proved their gene delivery efficacy [156]. The main limitations are the short bioavailability of viral carrier and the negligible permanence of the virus at the tumor side [157].
Combined complex of viral vehicles with immunomodulatory agents is currently under investigation to enhance the duration of the therapeutic effect [158]. Among non-viral vehicles, only the liposomes were approved to be tested in clinical trials showing low toxicity and a high biodistribution level. All other nanoparticles are still in earlier phase studies.
If viral carriers are the most suitable vehicles for gene therapy, also the oncolytic virotherapy proved to be a valuable option. OVs act as a genetic payload which directly lyses tumor cells. The apoptosis of cancer cells promotes the release of tumor-associated antigens (TAA) in the tumor microenvironment. TAA are recognized by immune cell, resulting in the burst of immune cascade [159,160,161].
Suicide gene therapy is also an excellent potential resource for HGGs treatment. This approach is based on the assumption that suicide enzymes are not expressed in healthy cells. Therefore, the intravenous administration of prodrug and the intratumoral inoculation of virus-mediated suicide genes allow restricting the therapeutic effect only to glioma cells, while reducing systemic side effects [76,82,162]. Another considerable advantage of suicide gene therapy lies in the “bystander effect”, namely the ability to share transduced genes and death signals to the neighboring cells through gap junctions [163,164,165].
In the era of translational medicine, the identification of specific tumor markers and genes involved in oncogenesis, above all EGFR, VEGF, TP53, and pRB pathways, offers new insights to design the target gene strategies and tumor suppressor gene therapies [22]. These lasts are based on the rearrangement of the glioma genome with the aim of restoring lost oncosuppressive functions. Delivery of tumor suppressor genes can be exploited as a combined approach, resulting in sensibilization of glioma cells to chemoradiotherapy [106,166].
Despite good assumptions, the intrinsic heterogeneity of HGGs, the multitude of mutations, and immune evasion mechanisms constitute the major limits of all these strategies. The immunomodulatory gene therapies, including INF e cytokines delivery, were projected precisely to modulate the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, meanwhile increasing the oncolytic gene therapy efficacy [134].
In accordance with the data outlined in the present review, the most accredited strategies are oncolytic virotherapy (26 trials), suicide gene strategies (18 trials), and immunomodulatory gene therapies (14 trials). Results reported overall excellent effectiveness, especially as adjuvant therapies with local injection after surgery. No significant toxicity was reported and, when preoperatively administered, a role in reducing tumor volume was also demonstrated.
The future perspectives of the HGGs treatment are directed toward the progressive integration of standard chemoradiotherapy with immune-boosting strategies and new tailored gene therapies.

5. Conclusions

Gene therapies are projected with the aim to edit the glioma genome and overcome the therapeutic resilience of HGGs. The oncolytic virotherapy, suicide genes and immunomodulatory strategies, tumor suppressor, and target genes therapies were widely tested in clinical trials, remaining mostly still experimental approaches.
Oncolytic viruses oHSVs and CRAds were proven to be safe and feasible. HSV-TK and CD suicide genes revealed a promising potential in several preclinical studies. Although they are not included in the first-line treatment protocol for newly diagnosed HGGs, gene therapies represent a valuable option as second-line adjuvant therapy for refractory GBM.
Future perspectives provide for the development of new administration vehicles, optimize biodistribution and selectivity. Further clinical trials are essential to implement standard protocols with gene innovative strategies in therapeutic synergy.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.G.L.; Methodology, A.G.L.; Validation, S.L.; Formal Analysis, A.G.L.; Investigation, S.L.; Resources, S.L.; Data Curation, A.G.L.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, A.G.L.; Writing—Review & Editing, S.L.; Visualization, A.G.L.; Supervision, S.L.; Project Administration, S.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

All data are included in the main text.

Acknowledgments

We want to thank Giuseppe Rizzo, a generous and high human value person, who decided to fund this article to help the Research advances and the patients suffering from neuroncological pathologies.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ostrom, Q.T.; Gittleman, H.; Liao, P.; Rouse, C.; Chen, Y.; Dowling, J.; Wolinsky, Y.; Kruchko, C.; Barnholtz-Sloan, J. CBTRUS statistical report: Primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2007–2011. Neuro Oncol. 2014, 16 (Suppl. 4), iv1–iv63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ostrom, Q.T.; Gittleman, H.; Stetson, L.; Virk, S.M.; Barnholtz-Sloan, J.S. Epidemiology of gliomas. Cancer Treat. Res. 2015, 163, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Soerjomataram, I.; Lortet-Tieulent, J.; Parkin, D.M.; Ferlay, J.; Mathers, C.; Forman, D.; Bray, F. Global burden of cancer in 2008: A systematic analysis of disability-adjusted life-years in 12 world regions. Lancet 2012, 380, 1840–1850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Eagan, R.T.; Scott, M. Evaluation of prognostic factors in chemotherapy of recurrent brain tumors. J. Clin. Oncol. 1983, 1, 38–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wen, P.Y.; Kesari, S. Malignant gliomas in adults. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008, 359, 492–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Raysi Dehcordi, S.; Ricci, A.; di Vitantonio, H.; de Paulis, D.; Luzzi, S.; Palumbo, P.; Cinque, B.; Tempesta, D.; Coletti, G.; Cipolloni, G.; et al. Stemness marker detection in the periphery of glioblastoma and ability of glioblastoma to generate glioma stem cells: Clinical correlations. World Neurosurg. 2017, 105, 895–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Palumbo, P.; Lombardi, F.; Augello, F.R.; Giusti, I.; Luzzi, S.; Dolo, V.; Cifone, M.G.; Cinque, B. NOS2 inhibitor 1400 W induces autophagic flux and influences extracellular vesicle profile in human glioblastoma U87MG cell line. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. De Tommasi, A.; Luzzi, S.; D’Urso, P.I.; de Tommasi, C.; Resta, N.; Ciappetta, P. Molecular genetic analysis in a case of ganglioglioma: Identification of a new mutation. Neurosurgery 2008, 63, 976–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jackson, C.M.; Choi, J.; Lim, M. Mechanisms of immunotherapy resistance: Lessons from glioblastoma. Nat. Immunol. 2019, 20, 1100–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. DeCordova, S.; Shastri, A.; Tsolaki, A.G.; Yasmin, H.; Klein, L.; Singh, S.K.; Kishore, U. Molecular heterogeneity and immunosuppressive microenvironment in glioblastoma. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Rolle, C.E.; Sengupta, S.; Lesniak, M.S. Mechanisms of immune evasion by gliomas. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2012, 746, 53–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Stupp, R.; Hegi, M.E.; Mason, W.P.; van den Bent, M.J.; Taphoorn, M.J.; Janzer, R.C.; Ludwin, S.K.; Allgeier, A.; Fisher, B.; Belanger, K.; et al. Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009, 10, 459–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Stupp, R.; Mason, W.P.; van den Bent, M.J.; Weller, M.; Fisher, B.; Taphoorn, M.J.; Belanger, K.; Brandes, A.A.; Marosi, C.; Bogdahn, U.; et al. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005, 352, 987–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Johnson, D.R.; O’Neill, B.P. Glioblastoma survival in the United States before and during the temozolomide era. J. Neurooncol. 2012, 107, 359–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wilcox, J.A.; Ramakrishna, R.; Magge, R. Immunotherapy in glioblastoma. World Neurosurg. 2018, 116, 518–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Everson, R.G.; Antonios, J.P.; Liau, L.M. Cell-based immunotherapy of gliomas. Prog. Neurol. Surg. 2018, 32, 90–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Han, S.J.; Zygourakis, C.; Lim, M.; Parsa, A.T. Immunotherapy for glioma: Promises and challenges. Neurosurg. Clin. N. Am. 2012, 23, 357–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Luzzi, S.; Crovace, A.M.; del Maestro, M.; Giotta Lucifero, A.; Elbabaa, S.K.; Cinque, B.; Palumbo, P.; Lombardi, F.; Cimini, A.; Cifone, M.G.; et al. The cell-based approach in neurosurgery: Ongoing trends and future perspectives. Heliyon 2019, 5, e02818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Giotta Lucifero, A.; Luzzi, S. Against the resilience of high-grade gliomas: The immunotherapeutic approach (Part I). Brain Sci. 2021, 11, 386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Giotta Lucifero, A.; Luzzi, S.; Brambilla, I.; Trabatti, C.; Mosconi, M.; Savasta, S.; Foiadelli, T. Innovative therapies for malignant brain tumors: The road to a tailored cure. Acta Biomed. 2020, 91, 5–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Xiong, L.; Wang, F.; Qi Xie, X. Advanced treatment in high-grade gliomas. J. BUON 2019, 24, 424–430. [Google Scholar]
  22. Lim, M.; Xia, Y.; Bettegowda, C.; Weller, M. Current state of immunotherapy for glioblastoma. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2018, 15, 422–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Luzzi, S.; Giotta Lucifero, A.; Brambilla, I.; Magistrali, M.; Mosconi, M.; Savasta, S.; Foiadelli, T. Adoptive immunotherapies in neuro-oncology: Classification, recent advances, and translational challenges. Acta Biomed. 2020, 91, 18–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Campanella, R.; Guarnaccia, L.; Caroli, M.; Zarino, B.; Carrabba, G.; la Verde, N.; Gaudino, C.; Rampini, A.; Luzzi, S.; Riboni, L.; et al. Personalized and translational approach for malignant brain tumors in the era of precision medicine: The strategic contribution of an experienced neurosurgery laboratory in a modern neurosurgery and neuro-oncology department. J. Neurol. Sci. 2020, 417, 117083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Luzzi, S.; Giotta Lucifero, A.; Brambilla, I.; Trabatti, C.; Mosconi, M.; Savasta, S.; Foiadelli, T. The impact of stem cells in neuro-oncology: Applications, evidence, limitations and challenges. Acta Biomed. 2020, 91, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Luzzi, S.; Giotta Lucifero, A.; Brambilla, I.; Semeria Mantelli, S.; Mosconi, M.; Foiadelli, T.; Savasta, S. Targeting the medulloblastoma: A molecular-based approach. Acta Biomed. 2020, 91, 79–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Maguire, C.A.; Ramirez, S.H.; Merkel, S.F.; Sena-Esteves, M.; Breakefield, X.O. Gene therapy for the nervous system: Challenges and new strategies. Neurotherapeutics 2014, 11, 817–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Okura, H.; Smith, C.A.; Rutka, J.T. Gene therapy for malignant glioma. Mol. Cell Ther. 2014, 2, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Wirth, T.; Yla-Herttuala, S. Gene therapy used in cancer treatment. Biomedicines 2014, 2, 149–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Kwiatkowska, A.; Nandhu, M.S.; Behera, P.; Chiocca, E.A.; Viapiano, M.S. Strategies in gene therapy for glioblastoma. Cancers 2013, 5, 1271–1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Kane, J.R.; Miska, J.; Young, J.S.; Kanojia, D.; Kim, J.W.; Lesniak, M.S. Sui generis: Gene therapy and delivery systems for the treatment of glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol. 2015, 17 (Suppl. 2), ii24–ii36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Giotta Lucifero, A.; Luzzi, S.; Brambilla, I.; Guarracino, C.; Mosconi, M.; Foiadelli, T.; Savasta, S. Gene therapies for high-grade gliomas: From the bench to the bedside. Acta Biomed. 2020, 91, 32–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Campanella, R.; Guarnaccia, L.; Cordiglieri, C.; Trombetta, E.; Caroli, M.; Carrabba, G.; la Verde, N.; Rampini, P.; Gaudino, C.; Costa, A.; et al. Tumor-educated platelets and angiogenesis in glioblastoma: AnoTher. brick in the wall for novel prognostic and targetable biomarkers, changing the vision from a localized tumor to a systemic pathology. Cells 2020, 9, 294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Caffery, B.; Lee, J.S.; Alexander-Bryant, A.A. Vectors for glioblastoma gene therapy: Viral & non-viral delivery strategies. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Anguela, X.M.; High, K.A. Entering the modern era of gene therapy. Annu. Rev. Med. 2019, 70, 273–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Kariyawasam, D.; Alexander, I.E.; Kurian, M.; Farrar, M.A. Great expectations: Virus-mediated gene therapy in neurological disorders. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2020, 91, 849–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Wang, H.; Su, W.; Wang, S.; Wang, X.; Liao, Z.; Kang, C.; Han, L.; Chang, J.; Wang, G.; Pu, P. Smart multifunctional core-shell nanospheres with drug and gene co-loaded for enhancing the therapeutic effect in a rat intracranial tumor model. Nanoscale 2012, 4, 6501–6508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Godbey, W.T.; Wu, K.K.; Mikos, A.G. Poly(ethylenimine) and its role in gene delivery. J. Control Release 1999, 60, 149–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lu, X.; Ping, Y.; Xu, F.J.; Li, Z.H.; Wang, Q.Q.; Chen, J.H.; Yang, W.T.; Tang, G.P. Bifunctional conjugates comprising β-cyclodextrin, polyethylenimine, and 5-fluoro-2’- deoxyuridine for drug delivery and gene transfer. Bioconjug. Chem. 2010, 21, 1855–1863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Li, J.; Gu, B.; Meng, Q.; Yan, Z.; Gao, H.; Chen, X.; Yang, X.; Lu, W. The use of myristic acid as a ligand of polyethylenimine/DNA nanoparticles for targeted gene therapy of glioblastoma. Nanotechnology 2011, 22, 435101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Zhan, C.; Meng, Q.; Li, Q.; Feng, L.; Zhu, J.; Lu, W. Cyclic RGD-polyethylene glycol-polyethylenimine for intracranial glioblastoma-targeted gene delivery. Chem. Asian J. 2012, 7, 91–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Richardson, S.C.; Pattrick, N.G.; Man, Y.K.; Ferruti, P.; Duncan, R. Poly(amidoamine)s as potential nonviral vectors: Ability to form interpolyelectrolyte complexes and to mediate transfection in vitro. Biomacromolecules 2001, 2, 1023–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Bai, C.Z.; Choi, S.; Nam, K.; An, S.; Park, J.S. Arginine modified PAMAM dendrimer for interferon beta gene delivery to malignant glioma. Int. J. Pharm. 2013, 445, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Wankhede, M.; Bouras, A.; Kaluzova, M.; Hadjipanayis, C.G. Magnetic nanoparticles: An emerging technology for malignant brain tumor imaging and therapy. Expert Rev. Clin. Pharmacol. 2012, 5, 173–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Yun, J.; Sonabend, A.M.; Ulasov, I.V.; Kim, D.H.; Rozhkova, E.A.; Novosad, V.; Dashnaw, S.; Brown, T.; Canoll, P.; Bruce, J.N.; et al. A novel adenoviral vector labeled with superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for real-time tracking of viral delivery. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2012, 19, 875–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Kaufmann, J.K.; Chiocca, E.A. Glioma virus therapies between bench and bedside. Neuro Oncol. 2014, 16, 334–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Ikeda, K.; Ichikawa, T.; Wakimoto, H.; Silver, J.S.; Deisboeck, T.S.; Finkelstein, D.; Harsh, G.R.T.; Louis, D.N.; Bartus, R.T.; Hochberg, F.H.; et al. Oncolytic virus therapy of multiple tumors in the brain requires suppression of innate and elicited antiviral responses. Nat. Med. 1999, 5, 881–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Natsume, A.; Yoshida, J. Gene therapy for high-grade glioma: Current approaches and future directions. Cell Adh. Migr. 2008, 2, 186–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Terada, K.; Wakimoto, H.; Tyminski, E.; Chiocca, E.A.; Saeki, Y. Development of a rapid method to generate multiple oncolytic HSV vectors and their in vivo evaluation using syngeneic mouse tumor models. Gene Ther. 2006, 13, 705–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Aghi, M.; Visted, T.; Depinho, R.A.; Chiocca, E.A. Oncolytic herpes virus with defective ICP6 specifically replicates in quiescent cells with homozygous genetic mutations in p16. Oncogene 2008, 27, 4249–4254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Rampling, R.; Cruickshank, G.; Papanastassiou, V.; Nicoll, J.; Hadley, D.; Brennan, D.; Petty, R.; MacLean, A.; Harland, J.; McKie, E.; et al. Toxicity evaluation of replication-competent herpes simplex virus (ICP 34.5 null mutant 1716) in patients with recurrent malignant glioma. Gene Ther. 2000, 7, 859–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Papanastassiou, V.; Rampling, R.; Fraser, M.; Petty, R.; Hadley, D.; Nicoll, J.; Harland, J.; Mabbs, R.; Brown, M. The potential for efficacy of the modified (ICP 34.5(-)) herpes simplex virus HSV1716 following intratumoural injection into human malignant glioma: A proof of principle study. Gene Ther. 2002, 9, 398–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Kanai, R.; Zaupa, C.; Sgubin, D.; Antoszczyk, S.J.; Martuza, R.L.; Wakimoto, H.; Rabkin, S.D. Effect of γ34.5 deletions on oncolytic herpes simplex virus activity in brain tumors. J. Virol. 2012, 86, 4420–4431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Markert, J.M.; Medlock, M.D.; Rabkin, S.D.; Gillespie, G.Y.; Todo, T.; Hunter, W.D.; Palmer, C.A.; Feigenbaum, F.; Tornatore, C.; Tufaro, F.; et al. Conditionally replicating herpes simplex virus mutant, G207 for the treatment of malignant glioma: Results of a phase I trial. Gene Ther. 2000, 7, 867–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Markert, J.M.; Liechty, P.G.; Wang, W.; Gaston, S.; Braz, E.; Karrasch, M.; Nabors, L.B.; Markiewicz, M.; Lakeman, A.D.; Palmer, C.A.; et al. Phase Ib trial of mutant herpes simplex virus G207 inoculated pre-and post-tumor resection for recurrent GBM. Mol. Ther. 2009, 17, 199–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Bischoff, J.R.; Kirn, D.H.; Williams, A.; Heise, C.; Horn, S.; Muna, M.; Ng, L.; Nye, J.A.; Sampson-Johannes, A.; Fattaey, A.; et al. An adenovirus mutant that replicates selectively in p53-deficient human tumor cells. Science 1996, 274, 373–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Chiocca, E.A.; Abbed, K.M.; Tatter, S.; Louis, D.N.; Hochberg, F.H.; Barker, F.; Kracher, J.; Grossman, S.A.; Fisher, J.D.; Carson, K.; et al. A phase I open-label, dose-escalation, multi-institutional trial of injection with an E1B-Attenuated adenovirus, ONYX-015, into the peritumoral region of recurrent malignant gliomas, in the adjuvant setting. Mol. Ther. 2004, 10, 958–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Fueyo, J.; Gomez-Manzano, C.; Alemany, R.; Lee, P.S.; McDonnell, T.J.; Mitlianga, P.; Shi, Y.X.; Levin, V.A.; Yung, W.K.; Kyritsis, A.P. A mutant oncolytic adenovirus targeting the Rb pathway produces anti-glioma effect in vivo. Oncogene 2000, 19, 2–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Lang, F.F.; Conrad, C.; Gomez-Manzano, C.; Yung, W.K.A.; Sawaya, R.; Weinberg, J.S.; Prabhu, S.S.; Rao, G.; Fuller, G.N.; Aldape, K.D.; et al. Phase I study of DNX-2401 (Delta-24-RGD) oncolytic adenovirus: Replication and immunotherapeutic effects in recurrent malignant glioma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2018, 36, 1419–1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Lang, F.; Tran, N.; Puduvalli, V.; Elder, J.; Fink, K.; Conrad, C.; Yung, W.; Penas-Prado, M.; Gomez-Manzano, C.; Peterkin, J.; et al. Phase 1b open-label randomized study of the oncolytic adenovirus DNX-2401 administered with or without interferon gamma for recurrent glioblastoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2017, 35, 2002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Dörig, R.E.; Marcil, A.; Chopra, A.; Richardson, C.D. The human CD46 molecule is a receptor for measles virus (Edmonston strain). Cell 1993, 75, 295–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Anderson, B.D.; Nakamura, T.; Russell, S.J.; Peng, K.W. High CD46 receptor density determines preferential killing of tumor cells by oncolytic measles virus. Cancer Res. 2004, 64, 4919–4926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Phuong, L.K.; Allen, C.; Peng, K.W.; Giannini, C.; Greiner, S.; TenEyck, C.J.; Mishra, P.K.; Macura, S.I.; Russell, S.J.; Galanis, E.C. Use of a vaccine strain of measles virus genetically engineered to produce carcinoembryonic antigen as a novel therapeutic agent against glioblastoma multiforme. Cancer Res. 2003, 63, 2462–2469. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  64. Myers, R.; Harvey, M.; Kaufmann, T.J.; Greiner, S.M.; Krempski, J.W.; Raffel, C.; Shelton, S.E.; Soeffker, D.; Zollman, P.; Federspiel, M.J.; et al. Toxicology study of repeat intracerebral administration of a measles virus derivative producing carcinoembryonic antigen in rhesus macaques in support of a phase I/II clinical trial for patients with recurrent gliomas. Hum. Gene Ther. 2008, 19, 690–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Allen, C.; Paraskevakou, G.; Iankov, I.; Giannini, C.; Schroeder, M.; Sarkaria, J.; Schroeder, M.; Puri, R.K.; Russell, S.J.; Galanis, E. Interleukin-13 displaying retargeted oncolytic measles virus strains have significant activity against gliomas with improved specificity. Mol. Ther. 2008, 16, 1556–1564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Paraskevakou, G.; Allen, C.; Nakamura, T.; Zollman, P.; James, C.D.; Peng, K.W.; Schroeder, M.; Russell, S.J.; Galanis, E. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-retargeted measles virus strains effectively target EGFR- or EGFRvIII expressing gliomas. Mol. Ther. 2007, 15, 677–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Allen, C.; Vongpunsawad, S.; Nakamura, T.; James, C.D.; Schroeder, M.; Cattaneo, R.; Giannini, C.; Krempski, J.; Peng, K.W.; Goble, J.M.; et al. Retargeted oncolytic measles strains entering via the EGFRvIII receptor maintain significant antitumor activity against gliomas with increased tumor specificity. Cancer Res. 2006, 66, 11840–11850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Gromeier, M.; Bossert, B.; Arita, M.; Nomoto, A.; Wimmer, E. Dual stem loops within the poliovirus internal ribosomal entry site control neurovirulence. J. Virol. 1999, 73, 958–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Gromeier, M.; Alexander, L.; Wimmer, E. Internal ribosomal entry site substitution eliminates neurovirulence in intergeneric poliovirus recombinants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 2370–2375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  70. Dobrikova, E.Y.; Goetz, C.; Walters, R.W.; Lawson, S.K.; Peggins, J.O.; Muszynski, K.; Ruppel, S.; Poole, K.; Giardina, S.L.; Vela, E.M.; et al. Attenuation of neurovirulence, biodistribution, and shedding of a poliovirus:rhinovirus chimera after intrathalamic inoculation in Macaca fascicularis. J. Virol. 2012, 86, 2750–2759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Merrill, M.K.; Bernhardt, G.; Sampson, J.H.; Wikstrand, C.J.; Bigner, D.D.; Gromeier, M. Poliovirus receptor CD155-targeted oncolysis of glioma. Neuro Oncol. 2004, 6, 208–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Sloan, K.E.; Stewart, J.K.; Treloar, A.F.; Matthews, R.T.; Jay, D.G. CD155/PVR enhances glioma cell dispersal by regulating adhesion signaling and focal adhesion dynamics. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 10930–10937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Duarte, S.; Carle, G.; Faneca, H.; de Lima, M.C.; Pierrefite-Carle, V. Suicide gene therapy in cancer: Where do we stand now? Cancer Lett. 2012, 324, 160–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Tiberghien, P. Use of suicide genes in gene therapy. J. Leukoc. Biol. 1994, 56, 203–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Karjoo, Z.; Chen, X.; Hatefi, A. Progress and problems with the use of suicide genes for targeted cancer therapy. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2016, 99, 113–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Immonen, A.; Vapalahti, M.; Tyynelä, K.; Hurskainen, H.; Sandmair, A.; Vanninen, R.; Langford, G.; Murray, N.; Ylä-Herttuala, S. AdvHSV-tk gene therapy with intravenous ganciclovir improves survival in human malignant glioma: A randomised, controlled study. Mol. Ther. 2004, 10, 967–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Rainov, N.G.; Heidecke, V. Clinical development of experimental virus-mediated gene therapy for malignant glioma. Anticancer Agents Med. Chem. 2011, 11, 739–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Halloran, P.J.; Fenton, R.G. Irreversible G2-M arrest and cytoskeletal reorganization induced by cytotoxic nucleoside analogues. Cancer Res. 1998, 58, 3855–3865. [Google Scholar]
  79. Wei, S.J.; Chao, Y.; Hung, Y.M.; Lin, W.C.; Yang, D.M.; Shih, Y.L.; Ch’ang, L.Y.; Whang-Peng, J.; Yang, W.K. S- and G2-phase cell cycle arrests and apoptosis induced by ganciclovir in murine melanoma cells transduced with herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase. Exp. Cell Res. 1998, 241, 66–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Rainov, N.G. A phase III clinical evaluation of herpes simplex virus type 1 thymidine kinase and ganciclovir gene therapy as an adjuvant to surgical resection and radiation in adults with previously untreated glioblastoma multiforme. Hum. Gene Ther. 2000, 11, 2389–2401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Sandmair, A.M.; Loimas, S.; Puranen, P.; Immonen, A.; Kossila, M.; Puranen, M.; Hurskainen, H.; Tyynelä, K.; Turunen, M.; Vanninen, R.; et al. Thymidine kinase gene therapy for human malignant glioma, using replication-deficient retroviruses or adenoviruses. Hum. Gene Ther. 2000, 11, 2197–2205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Germano, I.M.; Fable, J.; Gultekin, S.H.; Silvers, A. Adenovirus/herpes simplex-thymidine kinase/ganciclovir complex: Preliminary results of a phase I trial in patients with recurrent malignant gliomas. J. Neuro Oncol. 2003, 65, 279–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Westphal, M.; Ylä-Herttuala, S.; Martin, J.; Warnke, P.; Menei, P.; Eckland, D.; Kinley, J.; Kay, R.; Ram, Z. Adenovirus-mediated gene therapy with sitimagene ceradenovec followed by intravenous ganciclovir for patients with operable high-grade glioma (ASPECT): A randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013, 14, 823–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Takahashi, M.; Valdes, G.; Hiraoka, K.; Inagaki, A.; Kamijima, S.; Micewicz, E.; Gruber, H.E.; Robbins, J.M.; Jolly, D.J.; McBride, W.H.; et al. Radiosensitization of gliomas by intracellular generation of 5-fluorouracil potentiates prodrug activator gene therapy with a retroviral replicating vector. Cancer Gene Ther. 2014, 21, 405–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Tobias, A.; Ahmed, A.; Moon, K.S.; Lesniak, M.S. The art of gene therapy for glioma: A review of the challenging road to the bedside. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2013, 84, 213–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Cloughesy, T.F.; Landolfi, J.; Vogelbaum, M.A.; Ostertag, D.; Elder, J.B.; Bloomfield, S.; Carter, B.; Chen, C.C.; Kalkanis, S.N.; Kesari, S.; et al. Durable complete responses in some recurrent high-grade glioma patients treated with Toca 511 + Toca FC. Neuro Oncol. 2018, 20, 1383–1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Cloughesy, T.F.; Landolfi, J.; Hogan, D.J.; Bloomfield, S.; Carter, B.; Chen, C.C.; Elder, J.B.; Kalkanis, S.N.; Kesari, S.; Lai, A.; et al. Phase 1 trial of vocimagene amiretrorepvec and 5-fluorocytosine for recurrent high-grade glioma. Sci. Transl. Med. 2016, 8, 341ra375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Ardiani, A.; Johnson, A.J.; Ruan, H.; Sanchez-Bonilla, M.; Serve, K.; Black, M.E. Enzymes to die for: Exploiting nucleotide metabolizing enzymes for cancer gene therapy. Curr. Gene Ther. 2012, 12, 77–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Tai, C.K.; Wang, W.; Lai, Y.H.; Logg, C.R.; Parker, W.B.; Li, Y.F.; Hong, J.S.; Sorscher, E.J.; Chen, T.C.; Kasahara, N. Enhanced efficiency of prodrug activation therapy by tumor-selective replicating retrovirus vectors armed with the Escherichia coli purine nucleoside phosphorylase gene. Cancer Gene Ther. 2010, 17, 614–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Parker, W.B.; King, S.A.; Allan, P.W.; Bennett, L.L., Jr.; Secrist, J.A., 3rd; Montgomery, J.A.; Gilbert, K.S.; Waud, W.R.; Wells, A.H.; Gillespie, G.Y.; et al. In vivo gene therapy of cancer with E. coli purine nucleoside phosphorylase. Hum. Gene Ther. 1997, 8, 1637–1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Zhang, Y.; Parker, W.B.; Sorscher, E.J.; Ealick, S.E. PNP anticancer gene therapy. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2005, 5, 1259–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Sorscher, E.J.; Hong, J.S.; Allan, P.W.; Waud, W.R.; Parker, W.B. In vivo antitumor activity of intratumoral fludarabine phosphate in refractory tumors expressing E. coli purine nucleoside phosphorylase. Cancer Chemo Ther. Pharmacol. 2012, 70, 321–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Curlee, K.V.; Parker, W.B.; Sorscher, E.J. Tumor sensitization to purine analogs by E. coli PNP. Methods Mol. Med. 2004, 90, 223–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Secrist, J.A., 3rd; Parker, W.B.; Allan, P.W.; Bennett, L.L., Jr.; Waud, W.R.; Truss, J.W.; Fowler, A.T.; Montgomery, J.A.; Ealick, S.E.; Wells, A.H.; et al. Gene therapy of cancer: Activation of nucleoside prodrugs with E. coli purine nucleoside phosphorylase. Nucleosides Nucleotides 1999, 18, 745–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Hong, J.S.; Waud, W.R.; Levasseur, D.N.; Townes, T.M.; Wen, H.; McPherson, S.A.; Moore, B.A.; Bebok, Z.; Allan, P.W.; Secrist, J.A., 3rd; et al. Excellent in vivo bystander activity of fludarabine phosphate against human glioma xenografts that express the Escherichia coli purine nucleoside phosphorylase gene. Cancer Res. 2004, 64, 6610–6615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. Bharara, S.; Sorscher, E.J.; Gillespie, G.Y.; Lindsey, J.R.; Hong, J.S.; Curlee, K.V.; Allan, P.W.; Gadi, V.K.; Alexander, S.A.; Secrist, J.A., 3rd; et al. Antibiotic-mediated chemoprotection enhances adaptation of E. coli PNP for herpes simplex virus-based glioma therapy. Hum. Gene Ther. 2005, 16, 339–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways. Nature 2008, 455, 1061–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Bogler, O.; Huang, H.J.; Kleihues, P.; Cavenee, W.K. The p53 gene and its role in human brain tumors. Glia 1995, 15, 308–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. England, B.; Huang, T.; Karsy, M. Current understanding of the role and targeting of tumor suppressor p53 in glioblastoma multiforme. Tumor Biol 2013, 34, 2063–2074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Lang, F.F.; Yung, W.K.; Sawaya, R.; Tofilon, P.J. Adenovirus-mediated p53 gene therapy for human gliomas. Neurosurgery 1999, 45, 1093–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Li, H.; Alonso-Vanegas, M.; Colicos, M.A.; Jung, S.S.; Lochmuller, H.; Sadikot, A.F.; Snipes, G.J.; Seth, P.; Karpati, G.; Nalbantoglu, J. Intracerebral adenovirus-mediated p53 tumor suppressor gene therapy for experimental human glioma. Clin. Cancer Res. 1999, 5, 637–642. [Google Scholar]
  102. Van Meir, E.G.; Polverini, P.J.; Chazin, V.R.; Su Huang, H.J.; de Tribolet, N.; Cavenee, W.K. Release of an inhibitor of angiogenesis upon induction of wild type p53 expression in glioblastoma cells. Nat. Genet. 1994, 8, 171–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Cirielli, C.; Inyaku, K.; Capogrossi, M.C.; Yuan, X.; Williams, J.A. Adenovirus-mediated wild-type p53 expression induces apoptosis and suppresses tumorigenesis of experimental intracranial human malignant glioma. J. Neuro Oncol. 1999, 43, 99–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Shono, T.; Tofilon, P.J.; Schaefer, T.S.; Parikh, D.; Liu, T.J.; Lang, F.F. Apoptosis induced by adenovirus-mediated p53 gene transfer in human glioma correlates with site-specific phosphorylation. Cancer Res. 2002, 62, 1069–1076. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  105. Lang, F.F.; Bruner, J.M.; Fuller, G.N.; Aldape, K.; Prados, M.D.; Chang, S.; Berger, M.S.; McDermott, M.W.; Kunwar, S.M.; Junck, L.R.; et al. Phase I trial of adenovirus-mediated p53 gene therapy for recurrent glioma: Biological and clinical results. J. Clin. Oncol. 2003, 21, 2508–2518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Biroccio, A.; Bufalo, D.D.; Ricca, A.; D’Angelo, C.; D’Orazi, G.; Sacchi, A.; Soddu, S.; Zupi, G. Increase of BCNU sensitivity by wt-p53 gene therapy in glioblastoma lines depends on the administration schedule. Gene Ther. 1999, 6, 1064–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Badie, B.; Kramar, M.H.; Lau, R.; Boothman, D.A.; Economou, J.S.; Black, K.L. Adenovirus-mediated p53 gene delivery potentiates the radiation-induced growth inhibition of experimental brain tumors. J. Neuro Oncol. 1998, 37, 217–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Kim, S.S.; Rait, A.; Kim, E.; Pirollo, K.F.; Nishida, M.; Farkas, N.; Dagata, J.A.; Chang, E.H. A nanoparticle carrying the p53 gene targets tumors including cancer stem cells, sensitizes glioblastoma to chemotherapy and improves survival. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 5494–5514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Kanu, O.O.; Hughes, B.; Di, C.; Lin, N.; Fu, J.; Bigner, D.D.; Yan, H.; Adamson, C. Glioblastoma multiforme oncogenomics and signaling pathways. Clin. Med. Oncol. 2009, 3, 39–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  110. Chintala, S.K.; Fueyo, J.; Gomez-Manzano, C.; Venkaiah, B.; Bjerkvig, R.; Yung, W.K.; Sawaya, R.; Kyritsis, A.P.; Rao, J.S. Adenovirus-mediated p16/CDKN2 gene transfer suppresses glioma invasion in vitro. Oncogene 1997, 15, 2049–2057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Hung, K.S.; Hong, C.Y.; Lee, J.; Lin, S.K.; Huang, S.C.; Wang, T.M.; Tse, V.; Sliverberg, G.D.; Weng, S.C.; Hsiao, M. Expression of p16(INK4A) induces dominant suppression of glioblastoma growth in situ through necrosis and cell cycle arrest. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2000, 269, 718–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Hama, S.; Matsuura, S.; Tauchi, H.; Yamasaki, F.; Kajiwara, Y.; Arita, K.; Yoshioka, H.; Heike, Y.; Mandai, K.; Kurisu, K. p16 gene transfer increases cell killing with abnormal nucleation after ionising radiation in glioma cells. Br. J. Cancer 2003, 89, 1802–1811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Xande, J.G.; Dias, A.P.; Tamura, R.E.; Cruz, M.C.; Brito, B.; Ferreira, R.A.; Strauss, B.E.; Costanzi-Strauss, E. Bicistronic transfer of CDKN2A and p53 culminates in collaborative killing of human lung cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. Gene Ther. 2020, 27, 51–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Ohgaki, H.; Kleihues, P. The definition of primary and secondary glioblastoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2013, 19, 764–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Dunn, G.P.; Rinne, M.L.; Wykosky, J.; Genovese, G.; Quayle, S.N.; Dunn, I.F.; Agarwalla, P.K.; Chheda, M.G.; Campos, B.; Wang, A.; et al. Emerging insights into the molecular and cellular basis of glioblastoma. Genes Dev. 2012, 26, 756–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  116. Davies, M.A.; Lu, Y.; Sano, T.; Fang, X.; Tang, P.; LaPushin, R.; Koul, D.; Bookstein, R.; Stokoe, D.; Yung, W.K.; et al. Adenoviral transgene expression of MMAC/PTEN in human glioma cells inhibits Akt activation and induces anoikis. Cancer Res. 1998, 58, 5285–5290. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  117. Cheney, I.W.; Johnson, D.E.; Vaillancourt, M.T.; Avanzini, J.; Morimoto, A.; Demers, G.W.; Wills, K.N.; Shabram, P.W.; Bolen, J.B.; Tavtigian, S.V.; et al. Suppression of tumorigenicity of glioblastoma cells by adenovirus-mediated MMAC1/PTEN gene transfer. Cancer Res. 1998, 58, 2331–2334. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  118. Lu, W.; Zhou, X.; Hong, B.; Liu, J.; Yue, Z. Suppression of invasion in human U87 glioma cells by adenovirus-mediated co-transfer of TIMP-2 and PTEN gene. Cancer Lett. 2004, 214, 205–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Abe, T.; Terada, K.; Wakimoto, H.; Inoue, R.; Tyminski, E.; Bookstein, R.; Basilion, J.P.; Chiocca, E.A. PTEN decreases in vivo vascularization of experimental gliomas in spite of proangiogenic stimuli. Cancer Res. 2003, 63, 2300–2305. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  120. Inaba, N.; Kimura, M.; Fujioka, K.; Ikeda, K.; Somura, H.; Akiyoshi, K.; Inoue, Y.; Nomura, M.; Saito, Y.; Saito, H.; et al. The effect of PTEN on proliferation and drug-, and radiosensitivity in malignant glioma cells. Anticancer Res. 2011, 31, 1653–1658. [Google Scholar]
  121. Iwami, K.; Natsume, A.; Wakabayashi, T. Gene therapy for high-grade glioma. Neurol. Med. Chir. 2010, 50, 727–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Assi, H.; Candolfi, M.; Baker, G.; Mineharu, Y.; Lowenstein, P.R.; Castro, M.G. Gene therapy for brain tumors: Basic developments and clinical implementation. Neurosci. Lett. 2012, 527, 71–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  123. Qin, X.Q.; Beckham, C.; Brown, J.L.; Lukashev, M.; Barsoum, J. Human and mouse IFN-beta gene therapy exhibits different anti-tumor mechanisms in mouse models. Mol. Ther. 2001, 4, 356–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Natsume, A.; Mizuno, M.; Ryuke, Y.; Yoshida, J. Antitumor effect and cellular immunity activation by murine interferon-beta gene transfer against intracerebral glioma in mouse. Gene Ther. 1999, 6, 1626–1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  125. Natsume, A.; Tsujimura, K.; Mizuno, M.; Takahashi, T.; Yoshida, J. IFN-beta gene therapy induces systemic antitumor immunity against malignant glioma. J. Neuro Oncol. 2000, 47, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Yoshida, J.; Mizuno, M.; Fujii, M.; Kajita, Y.; Nakahara, N.; Hatano, M.; Saito, R.; Nobayashi, M.; Wakabayashi, T. Human gene therapy for malignant gliomas (glioblastoma multiforme and anaplastic astrocytoma) by in vivo transduction with human interferon beta gene using cationic liposomes. Hum. Gene Ther. 2004, 15, 77–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Wakabayashi, T.; Natsume, A.; Hashizume, Y.; Fujii, M.; Mizuno, M.; Yoshida, J. A phase I clinical trial of interferon-beta gene therapy for high-grade glioma: Novel findings from gene expression profiling and autopsy. J. Gene Med. 2008, 10, 329–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Knüpfer, M.M.; Poppenborg, H.; Van Gool, S.; Domula, M.; Wolff, J.E. Interferon-gamma inhibits proliferation and adhesion of T98G human malignant glioma cells in vitro. Klin. Padiatr. 1997, 209, 271–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Borden, E.C.; Lindner, D.; Dreicer, R.; Hussein, M.; Peereboom, D. Second-generation interferons for cancer: Clinical targets. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2000, 10, 125–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Ehtesham, M.; Samoto, K.; Kabos, P.; Acosta, F.L.; Gutierrez, M.A.; Black, K.L.; Yu, J.S. Treatment of intracranial glioma with in situ interferon-gamma and tumor necrosis factor-alpha gene transfer. Cancer Gene Ther. 2002, 9, 925–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Enderlin, M.; Kleinmann, E.V.; Struyf, S.; Buracchi, C.; Vecchi, A.; Kinscherf, R.; Kiessling, F.; Paschek, S.; Sozzani, S.; Rommelaere, J.; et al. TNF-alpha and the IFN-gamma-inducible protein 10 (IP-10/CXCL-10) delivered by parvoviral vectors act in synergy to induce antitumor effects in mouse glioblastoma. Cancer Gene Ther. 2009, 16, 149–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  132. Colombo, M.P.; Trinchieri, G. Interleukin-12 in anti-tumor immunity and immunotherapy. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2002, 13, 155–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Ma, X.; Chow, J.M.; Gri, G.; Carra, G.; Gerosa, F.; Wolf, S.F.; Dzialo, R.; Trinchieri, G. The interleukin 12 p40 gene promoter is primed by interferon gamma in monocytic cells. J. Exp. Med. 1996, 183, 147–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  134. Chen, B.; Timiryasova, T.M.; Andres, M.L.; Kajioka, E.H.; Dutta-Roy, R.; Gridley, D.S.; Fodor, I. Evaluation of combined vaccinia virus-mediated antitumor gene therapy with p53, IL-2, and IL-12 in a glioma model. Cancer Gene Ther. 2000, 7, 1437–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  135. Chiu, T.L.; Wang, M.J.; Su, C.C. The treatment of glioblastoma multiforme through activation of microglia and TRAIL induced by rAAV2-mediated IL-12 in a syngeneic rat model. J. Biomed. Sci. 2012, 19, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  136. Hellums, E.K.; Markert, J.M.; Parker, J.N.; He, B.; Perbal, B.; Roizman, B.; Whitley, R.J.; Langford, C.P.; Bharara, S.; Gillespie, G.Y. Increased efficacy of an interleukin-12-secreting herpes simplex virus in a syngeneic intracranial murine glioma model. Neuro Oncol. 2005, 7, 213–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Markert, J.M.; Cody, J.J.; Parker, J.N.; Coleman, J.M.; Price, K.H.; Kern, E.R.; Quenelle, D.C.; Lakeman, A.D.; Schoeb, T.R.; Palmer, C.A.; et al. Preclinical evaluation of a genetically engineered herpes simplex virus expressing interleukin-12. J. Virol. 2012, 86, 5304–5313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  138. Yu, J.S.; Wei, M.X.; Chiocca, E.A.; Martuza, R.L.; Tepper, R.I. Treatment of glioma by engineered interleukin 4-secreting cells. Cancer Res. 1993, 53, 3125–3128. [Google Scholar]
  139. Okada, H.; Giezeman-Smits, K.M.; Tahara, H.; Attanucci, J.; Fellows, W.K.; Lotze, M.T.; Chambers, W.H.; Bozik, M.E. Effective cytokine gene therapy against an intracranial glioma using a retrovirally transduced IL-4 plus HSVtk tumor vaccine. Gene Ther. 1999, 6, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  140. Okada, H.; Pollack, I.F.; Lotze, M.T.; Lunsford, L.D.; Kondziolka, D.; Lieberman, F.; Schiff, D.; Attanucci, J.; Edington, H.; Chambers, W.; et al. Gene therapy of malignant gliomas: A phase I study of IL-4-HSV-TK gene-modified autologous tumor to elicit an immune response. Hum. Gene Ther. 2000, 11, 637–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Colombo, F.; Barzon, L.; Franchin, E.; Pacenti, M.; Pinna, V.; Danieli, D.; Zanusso, M.; Palu, G. Combined HSV-TK/IL-2 gene therapy in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: Biological and clinical results. Cancer Gene Ther. 2005, 12, 835–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Del Vecchio, C.A.; Li, G.; Wong, A.J. Targeting EGF receptor variant III: Tumor-specific peptide vaccination for malignant gliomas. Expert Rev. Vaccines 2012, 11, 133–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Gan, H.K.; Cvrljevic, A.N.; Johns, T.G. The epidermal growth factor receptor variant III (EGFRvIII): Where wild things are altered. FEBS J. 2013, 280, 5350–5370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Shir, A.; Levitzki, A. Inhibition of glioma growth by tumor-specific activation of double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase PKR. Nat. Biotechnol. 2002, 20, 895–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Kang, C.S.; Zhang, Z.Y.; Jia, Z.F.; Wang, G.X.; Qiu, M.Z.; Zhou, H.X.; Yu, S.Z.; Chang, J.; Jiang, H.; Pu, P.Y. Suppression of EGFR expression by antisense or small interference RNA inhibits U251 glioma cell growth in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Gene Ther. 2006, 13, 530–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  146. Wang, K.; Park, J.O.; Zhang, M. Treatment of glioblastoma multiforme using a combination of small interfering RNA targeting epidermal growth factor receptor and β-catenin. J. Gene Med. 2013, 15, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  147. Karpel-Massler, G.; Schmidt, U.; Unterberg, A.; Halatsch, M.E. Therapeutic inhibition of the epidermal growth factor receptor in high-grade gliomas: Where do we stand? Mol. Cancer Res. 2009, 7, 1000–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  148. Padfield, E.; Ellis, H.P.; Kurian, K.M. Current therapeutic advances targeting EGFR and EGFRvIII in glioblastoma. Front. Oncol. 2015, 5, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  149. Kim, C.; Shah, B.P.; Subramaniam, P.; Lee, K.B. Synergistic induction of apoptosis in brain cancer cells by targeted codelivery of siRNA and anticancer drugs. Mol. Pharm. 2011, 8, 1955–1961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  150. Im, S.A.; Gomez-Manzano, C.; Fueyo, J.; Liu, T.J.; Ke, L.D.; Kim, J.S.; Lee, H.Y.; Steck, P.A.; Kyritsis, A.P.; Yung, W.K. Antiangiogenesis treatment for gliomas: Transfer of antisense-vascular endothelial growth factor inhibits tumor growth in vivo. Cancer Res. 1999, 59, 895–900. [Google Scholar]
  151. Niola, F.; Evangelisti, C.; Campagnolo, L.; Massalini, S.; Buè, M.C.; Mangiola, A.; Masotti, A.; Maira, G.; Farace, M.G.; Ciafrè, S.A. A plasmid-encoded VEGF siRNA reduces glioblastoma angiogenesis and its combination with interleukin-4 blocks tumor growth in a xenograft mouse model. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2006, 5, 174–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  152. Yoo, J.Y.; Kim, J.H.; Kwon, Y.G.; Kim, E.C.; Kim, N.K.; Choi, H.J.; Yun, C.O. VEGF-specific short hairpin RNA-expressing oncolytic adenovirus elicits potent inhibition of angiogenesis and tumor growth. Mol. Ther. 2007, 15, 295–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Kang, Y.A.; Shin, H.C.; Yoo, J.Y.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, J.S.; Yun, C.O. Novel cancer antiangiotherapy using the VEGF promoter-targeted artificial zinc-finger protein and oncolytic adenovirus. Mol. Ther. 2008, 16, 1033–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Heidenreich, R.; Machein, M.; Nicolaus, A.; Hilbig, A.; Wild, C.; Clauss, M.; Plate, K.H.; Breier, G. Inhibition of solid tumor growth by gene transfer of VEGF receptor-1 mutants. Int. J. Cancer 2004, 111, 348–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Thorne, S.H.; Tam, B.Y.; Kirn, D.H.; Contag, C.H.; Kuo, C.J. Selective intratumoral amplification of an antiangiogenic vector by an oncolytic virus produces enhanced antivascular and anti-tumor efficacy. Mol. Ther. 2006, 13, 938–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Lachmann, R. Herpes simplex virus-based vectors. Int. J. Exp. Pathol. 2004, 85, 177–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Chiocca, E.A.; Aghi, M.; Fulci, G. Viral therapy for glioblastoma. Cancer J. 2003, 9, 167–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Kurozumi, K.; Hardcastle, J.; Thakur, R.; Yang, M.; Christoforidis, G.; Fulci, G.; Hochberg, F.H.; Weissleder, R.; Carson, W.; Chiocca, E.A.; et al. Effect of tumor microenvironment modulation on the efficacy of oncolytic virus therapy. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2007, 99, 1768–1781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  159. Chiocca, E.A. Oncolytic viruses. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2002, 2, 938–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Selznick, L.A.; Shamji, M.F.; Fecci, P.; Gromeier, M.; Friedman, A.H.; Sampson, J. Molecular strategies for the treatment of malignant glioma—Genes, viruses, and vaccines. Neurosurg. Rev. 2008, 31, 141–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  161. Marelli, G.; Howells, A.; Lemoine, N.R.; Wang, Y. Oncolytic viral therapy and the immune system: A double-edged sword against cancer. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  162. Kaliberov, S.A.; Market, J.M.; Gillespie, G.Y.; Krendelchtchikova, V.; della Manna, D.; Sellers, J.C.; Kaliberova, L.N.; Black, M.E.; Buchsbaum, D.J. Mutation of Escherichia coli cytosine deaminase significantly enhances molecular chemotherapy of human glioma. Gene Ther. 2007, 14, 1111–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Touraine, R.L.; Vahanian, N.; Ramsey, W.J.; Blaese, R.M. Enhancement of the herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase/ganciclovir bystander effect and its antitumor efficacy in vivo by pharmacologic manipulation of gap junctions. Hum. Gene Ther. 1998, 9, 2385–2391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Touraine, R.L.; Ishii-Morita, H.; Ramsey, W.J.; Blaese, R.M. The bystander effect in the HSVtk/ganciclovir system and its relationship to gap junctional communication. Gene Ther. 1998, 5, 1705–1711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  165. Fick, J.; Barker, F.G., 2nd; Dazin, P.; Westphale, E.M.; Beyer, E.C.; Israel, M.A. The extent of heterocellular communication mediated by gap junctions is predictive of bystander tumor cytotoxicity in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92, 11071–11075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  166. Lang, F.F.; Yung, W.K.; Raju, U.; Libunao, F.; Terry, N.H.; Tofilon, P.J. Enhancement of radiosensitivity of wild-type p53 human glioma cells by adenovirus-mediated delivery of the p53 gene. J. Neurosurg. 1998, 89, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Brainsci 11 00976 g001 550
Figure 1. PRISMA flow-chart for systematic review.
Figure 1. PRISMA flow-chart for systematic review.
Brainsci 11 00976 g001
Brainsci 11 00976 g002 550
Figure 2. Oncolytic viruses’ mechanism of action.
Figure 2. Oncolytic viruses’ mechanism of action.
Brainsci 11 00976 g002
Brainsci 11 00976 g003 550
Figure 3. Suicide gene mechanism of action.
Figure 3. Suicide gene mechanism of action.
Brainsci 11 00976 g003
Brainsci 11 00976 g004 550
Figure 4. Schematic representation of tumor suppressor gene therapy.
Figure 4. Schematic representation of tumor suppressor gene therapy.
Brainsci 11 00976 g004
Brainsci 11 00976 g005 550
Figure 5. Schematic representation of immunomodulatory gene therapy.
Figure 5. Schematic representation of immunomodulatory gene therapy.
Brainsci 11 00976 g005
Brainsci 11 00976 g006 550
Figure 6. Target gene mechanism of action.
Figure 6. Target gene mechanism of action.
Brainsci 11 00976 g006
Table
Table 1. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria for Literature Review.
Table 1. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria for Literature Review.
Inclusion CriteriaExclusion Criteria
Reviews, Peer-Reviews, EditorialsCase Reports, Abstracts, and Dissertations
Clinical, Pre-clinical TrialsAbandoned Clinical Trials
English language, or translatedNon-English language
Publications in 2005–2020 decadeStudies prior to 2005
Studies on Human, or Human ProductsAnimal Studies
Neuro-oncology relevancePublications not related to neuro-oncology
Publications about High-Grade Glioma treatmentPublications not related to High-Grade Glioma
Table
Table 2. Comparison between viral and non-viral vectors.
Table 2. Comparison between viral and non-viral vectors.
Vectors
ViralNon-Viral
ADHSVRTCationic LiposomesPolymers
(PEI, PAMAM)
Diameter (nm)150–200100–30010020–20050–250
Genetic PayloaddsDNAdsDNARNAdsDNA/RNAdsDNA/RNA
Transduction EfficiencyHighVery HighMediumHighHigh
ImmunogenicityVery HighVery HighMediumNoneNone
Mutagenesis RiskNoneNoneYesNoneNone
AD: Adenovirus; HSV: Herpes Simplex Virus; PAMAM: Poly-Amidoamine Polymer; PEI: Polyethylenimine; RT: Retrovirus.
Table
Table 3. Classification of Gene Therapies for High-Grade Gliomas.
Table 3. Classification of Gene Therapies for High-Grade Gliomas.
Gene Therapies
Oncolytic VirotherapyOncolytic virusesoHSV
CRAd
MV
PVS-RIPO
Suicide Gene TherapySuicide GenesTK
CD
PNP
Tumor Suppressor Gene TherapyTumor Suppressor Genesp53
p16
PTEN
Immunomodulatory Gene TherapyImmunomodulatory GenesIFNβ/γ
IL-4, IL-12
Gene Target TherapyTarget GenesEGFRvIII
VEGF
CD: Cytosine Deaminase; CRAd: Conditionally Replicating Adenovirus; EGFRvIII: Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Variant vIII; oHSV: Oncolytic Herpes Simplex Virus; IFN: Human Interferon; IL: Interleukine; MV: Measles Paramyxovirus; PNP: Purine Nucleoside Phosphorylase; PTEN: Phosphatase and Tensin Homologue; PVS-RIPO: Recombinant Nonpathogenic Polio-Rhinovirus; TK: Thymidine Kinase; VEGF: Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor.
Table
Table 4. Clinical trials on oncolytic virotherapy for high-grade gliomas.
Table 4. Clinical trials on oncolytic virotherapy for high-grade gliomas.
#ClinicalTrials.gov IdentifierTitleStatusPhaseDiseases# of Pts. EnrolledTreatment Locations
1NCT00028158Safety and Effectiveness Study of G207, a Tumor-Killing Virus, in Patients with Recurrent Brain CancerCompletedI/IIGlioma
Astrocytoma
Glioblastoma		65Drug: G207, an oncolytic virusNA
2NCT00157703G207 Followed by Radiation Therapy in Malignant GliomaCompletedIMalignant Glioma9Drug: G207, an oncolytic virusUSA
3NCT02031965Oncolytic HSV-1716 in Treating Younger Patients with Refractory or Recurrent High-Grade Glioma That Can Be Removed by SurgeryTerminatedIBrain and Central Nervous System Tumors2Biological: oncolytic HSV-1716; Drug: dexamethasone
Procedure: therapeutic conventional surgery		USA
4NCT03152318 A Study of the Treatment of Recurrent Malignant Glioma With rQNestin34.5 v.2RecruitingIBrain and Central
Nervous System Tumors		108Drug: rQNestin, Cyclophosphamide; Procedure: Stereotactic biopsyUSA
5NCT02197169 DNX-2401 With Interferon Gamma (IFN-γ) for Recurrent Glioblastoma or Gliosarcoma Brain TumorsCompletedIGlioblastoma
Gliosarcoma		37Single intratumoral injection of DNX-2401; Drug: Interferon-gammaUSA
6NCT01174537 New Castle Disease Virus (NDV) in Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM), Sarcoma and NeuroblastomaWithdrawnI/IIGlioblastoma
Sarcoma
Neuroblastoma		0Biological: New Castle Disease VirusIL
7NCT00390299Viral Therapy in Treating Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma MultiformeCompletedIAnaplastic Astrocytoma
Anaplastic
Oligodendroglioma Mixed Glioma
Recurrent Glioblastoma		23Biological: Carcinoembryonic Antigen-Expressing Measles Virus; Therapeutic Conventional SurgeryUSA
8NCT01301430 Parvovirus H-1 (ParvOryx) in Patients with Progressive
Primary or Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme.		CompletedI/IIGlioblastoma Multiforme18Drug: H-1PVDE
9NCT01582516 Safety Study of Replication-competent Adenovirus (Delta-24-rgd) in Patients with Recurrent GlioblastomaCompletedI/IIBrain Tumor
Recurring Glioblastoma		20Biological: delta-24-RGD adenovirusNL
10NCT02062827 Genetically Engineered HSV-1 Phase 1 Study for the Treatment of Recurrent Malignant GliomaRecruitingIRecurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme
Progressive Glioblastoma Multiforme
Anaplastic Astrocytoma or Gliosarcoma		36Biological: M032 (NSC 733972)USA
11NCT03911388HSV G207 in Children with Recurrent or Refractory Cerebellar Brain TumorsRecruitingIBrain and Central Nervous System Tumors15Biological: G207USA
12NCT00805376DNX-2401 (Formerly Known as Delta-24-RGD-4C) for Recurrent Malignant GliomasCompletedIBrain Cancer
Central Nervous System Diseases		37Drug: DNX-2401
Procedure: Tumor Removal		USA
13NCT03896568Oncolytic Adenovirus DNX-2401 in Treating Patients with Recurrent High-Grade GliomaRecruitingIBrain and Central Nervous System Tumors36Oncolytic Adenovirus Ad5-DNX-2401
Therapeutic Conventional Surgery		USA
14NCT01956734 Virus DNX2401 and Temozolomide in Recurrent GlioblastomaCompletedIGlioblastoma Multiforme
Recurrent Tumor		31Procedure: DNX2401 and TemozolomideES
15NCT02986178PVSRIPO in Recurrent Malignant GliomaActive,
not recruiting		IIMalignant Glioma122PVSRIPOUSA
16NCT03973879Combination of PVSRIPO and Atezolizumab for Adults with Recurrent Malignant GliomaWithdrawnI/IIMalignant Glioma0Biological: PVSRIPO
Drug: Atezolizumab		NA
17NCT03043391Phase 1b Study PVSRIPO for Recurrent Malignant Glioma in ChildrenRecruitingIBrain and Central Nervous System Tumors12Biological: Polio/Rhinovirus Recombinant (PVSRIPO)USA
18NCT01491893PVSRIPO for Recurrent Glioblastoma (GBM)Active,
not recruiting		IGlioma Malignant Glioma61Recombinant nonpathogenic polio-rhinovirus chimera
(PVSRIPO)		USA
19NCT03072134Neural Stem Cell Based Virotherapy of Newly Diagnosed Malignant GliomaActive,
not recruiting		IBrain and Central Nervous System TumorsNANeural stem cells loaded with
an oncolytic adenovirus		NA
20NCT03657576Trial of C134 in Patients with Recurrent GBMActive,
not recruiting		IGlioblastoma Multiforme of Brain
Anaplastic Astrocytoma of Brain
Gliosarcoma of Brain		24Biological: C134USA
21NCT02798406Combination Adenovirus + Pembrolizumab to Trigger Immune Virus EffectsActive,
not recruiting		IIBrain and Central Nervous System Tumors49Biological: DNX-2401 Biological: pembrolizumabUSA
22NCT03714334DNX-2440 Oncolytic Adenovirus for Recurrent GlioblastomaRecruitingIGlioblastoma
Glioblastoma, Adult		24Drug: DNX-2440 injectionES
23NCT03294486Safety and Efficacy of the Oncolytic Virus Armed for Local Chemotherapy, TG6002/5-FC, in Recurrent Glioblastoma PatientsRecruitingI/IIGlioblastoma
Brain Cancer		78Drug: Combination of TG6002 and 5-flucytosine (5-FC, Ancotil®)FR
24NCT02457845HSV G207 Alone or With a Single Radiation Dose in Children
With Progressive or Recurrent Supratentorial Brain Tumors		Active,
not recruiting		IBrain and Central Nervous System Tumors12Biological: G207USA
25NCT00006106ONYX-015 With Cisplatin and Fluorouracil in Treating Patients with Advanced Head and Neck CancerWithdrawnILip and Oral Cavity Cancer
Head and Neck Cancer
Oropharyngeal Cancer		0Drug: Cisplatin, Fluorouracil
Drug: ONYX-015		USA
26NCT00528684Safety and Efficacy Study of REOLYSIN® in the Treatment of Recurrent Malignant GliomasCompletedIMalignant Glioma18Biological:
REOLYSIN®		USA
DE: Germany; ES: Spain; FR: France; GBM: Glioblastoma Multiforme; HSV: Herpes Simplex Virus; IL: Israel; IFN-γ: Interferon Gamma; NDV: New Castle Disease Virus; NL: Netherlands; Pts: Patients; PVSRIPO: Recombinant Nonpathogenic Poliorhinovirus; USA: United States of America.
Table
Table 5. Clinical trials on suicide gene therapies for high-grade gliomas.
Table 5. Clinical trials on suicide gene therapies for high-grade gliomas.
#ClinicalTrials.gov IdentifierTitleStatusPhaseDiseases# of Pts. EnrolledTreatment Locations
1NCT00870181ADV-TK Improves Outcome of Recurrent High-Grade GliomaCompletedIIMalignant Glioma of Brain
Glioblastoma		47Biological: ADV-TK/GCV
Procedure: Surgery
Drug: systemic chemotherapy		CHN
2NCT00002824Gene Therapy in Treating Patients with Primary Brain TumorsCompletedIBrain and Central Nervous System TumorsNABiological: gene therapy
Drug: chemotherapy, ganciclovir
Procedure: conventional surgery		USA
3NCT00751270Phase 1b Study of AdV-tk + Valacyclovir CombinedWith Radiation Therapy for Malignant GliomasCompletedIMalignant Glioma
Glioblastoma Multiforme
Anaplastic Astrocytoma		15Biological: AdV-tk
Drug: Valacyclovir		USA
4NCT03596086HSV-tk + Valacyclovir + SBRT + Chemotherapy for Recurrent GBMRecruitingI/IIGlioblastoma Multiforme
Astrocytoma, Grade III		62Drug: ADV/HSV-tk (gene therapy)USA
5NCT00634231A Phase I Study of AdV-tk + Prodrug Therapy in Combination with Radiation Therapy for Pediatric Brain TumorsActive,
not recruiting		IMalignant Glioma
Recurrent Ependymoma		12Biological: AdV-tk
Drug: valacyclovir
Radiation: Radiation		USA
6NCT00589875 Phase 2a Study of AdV-tk with Standard
Radiation Therapy for Malignant Glioma (BrTK02)		CompletedIIMalignant Glioma
Glioblastoma Multiforme
Anaplastic Astrocytoma		52Biological: AdV-tk
Drug: Valacyclovir		USA
7NCT03603405HSV-tk and XRT and Chemotherapy for Newly Diagnosed GBMRecruitingI/IIGlioblastoma
Anaplastic Astrocytoma		62Drug: ADV/HSV-tk (gene therapy)USA
8NCT00001328Gene Therapy for the Treatment of Brain TumorsCompletedIBrain Neoplasm
Neoplasm Metastasis		15Drug: Cytovene (Ganciclovir Sodium) Device: G1TKSVNa.53 Producer Cell LineUSA
9NCT03576612GMCI, Nivolumab, and Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients
with Newly Diagnosed High-Grade Gliomas		Active,
not recruiting		IGlioma, Malignant36Biological: AdV-tk, Nivolumab
Drug: Valacyclovir, Temozolomide; Radiation 		USA
10NCT01985256Study of a Retroviral Replicating Vector Given Intravenously
to Patients Undergoing Surgery for Recurrent Brain Tumor		CompletedIGlioblastoma Multiforme
Anaplastic Astrocytoma
Anaplastic OligodendrogliomaAnaplastic Oligoastrocytoma		17Biological: Toca 511
Drug: Toca FC		USA
11NCT01156584 A Study of a Retroviral Replicating Vector Combined with a Prodrug Administered to Patients with Recurrent Malignant GliomaCompletedIGlioblastoma
Anaplastic Astrocytoma
Anaplastic OligodendrogliomaAnaplastic Oligoastrocytoma		54Biological: Toca 511Drug: Toca FCUSA
12NCT01174537 New Castle Disease Virus (NDV) in
Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM), Sarcoma and Neuroblastoma		WithdrawnI/IIGlioblastoma
Sarcoma
Neuroblastoma		0Biological: New Castle Disease VirusIL
13NCT01470794Study of a Retroviral Replicating Vector Combined with a Prodrug to Treat Patients Undergoing Surgery for a Recurrent Malignant Brain TumorCompletedIGlioblastoma Multiforme
Anaplastic Astrocytoma
Anaplastic OligodendrogliomaAnaplastic Oligoastrocytoma		58Biological: Toca 511
Drug: Toca FC		USA
14NCT00390299Viral Therapy in Treating Patients with
Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme		CompletedIAnaplastic Astrocytoma
Anaplastic Oligodendroglioma
Mixed Glioma
Recurrent Glioblastoma		23Biological: Carcinoembryonic Antigen-Expressing Measles Virus; Therapeutic Conventional SurgeryUSA
15NCT02414165 The Toca 5 Trial: Toca 511 & Toca FC Versus Standard of Carec in Patients with Recurrent High-Grade GliomaTerminatedII/IIIGlioblastoma Multiforme
Anaplastic Astrocytoma		403Biological: Toca 511, Bevacizumab; Drug: Toca FC; Drug: Lomustine, TemozolomideUSA
16NCT01811992Combined Cytotoxic and Immune-Stimulatory Therapy for GliomaActive,
not recruiting		IMalignant Glioma
Glioblastoma Multiforme		19Dose Escalation of Ad-hCMV-TK and Ad-hCMV-Flt3LUSA
17NCT02598011A Study of the Safety of Toca 511, a Retroviral Replicating Vector, Combined with Toca FC in Subjects with Newly Diagnosed High Grade Glioma Receiving Standard of CareWithdrawnINewly Diagnosed High Grade Glioma (HGG)0Biological: Toca 511
Drug: Toca FC		NA
18NCT04406272VB-111 in Surgically Accessible Recurrent/Progressive GBMRecruitingIIGlioblastoma
Recurrent Glioblastoma		45Drug: VB11
Procedure: Surgery
Drug: Bevacizumab		USA
CHN: China; CMV: Citomegalovirus; GBM: Glioblastoma Multiforme; GCV: Ganciclovir; IL: Israel; NA: Not Available; Pts: Patients; XRT: Radiotherapy.
Table
Table 6. Clinical trials on tumor suppressor gene therapies for high-grade gliomas.
Table 6. Clinical trials on tumor suppressor gene therapies for high-grade gliomas.
#ClinicalTrials.gov IdentifierTitleStatusPhaseDiseases# of Pts. EnrolledTreatment Locations
1NCT00004041Gene Therapy in Treating Patients
with Recurrent Malignant Gliomas		CompletedIBrain and Central Nervous System TumorsNABiological: Ad5CMV-p53 gene; Procedure: conventional surgeryUSA
2NCT00004080Gene Therapy in Treating Patients
with Recurrent or Progressive Brain Tumors		CompletedIBrain and Central Nervous System TumorsNABiological: recombinant adenovirus-p53 SCH-58500; Procedure: conventional surgeryNA
Ad: Adenovirus; CMV: Citomegalovirus; NA: Not Available; Pts: Patients; USA: United States of America.
Table
Table 7. Clinical trials on immunomodulatory gene therapies for high-grade gliomas.
Table 7. Clinical trials on immunomodulatory gene therapies for high-grade gliomas.
#ClinicalTrials.gov IdentifierTitleStatusPhaseDiseases# of Pts. EnrolledTreatment Locations
1NCT00031083Dose Escalation Study to Determine the Safety of IFN-Beta Gene Transfer in the Treatment of Grade III & Grade IV GliomasCompletedIGlioblastoma
Multiforme Anaplastic Astrocytoma
Oligoastrocytoma, Mixed
Gliosarcoma		12Genetic: Interferon-betaUSA
2NCT02026271 A Study of Ad-RTS-hIL-12 With Veledimex in Subjects with Glioblastoma or Malignant GliomaActive, not recruitingIGlioblastoma Multiforme
Anaplastic Oligoastrocytoma		48Biological: Ad-RTS-hIL-12; Drug: veledimexUSA
3NCT03679754Evaluation of Ad-RTS-hIL-12 + Veledimex in Subjects with Recurrent or Progressive Glioblastoma, a Substudy to ATI001-102Active, not recruitingIGlioblastoma Multiforme36Biological: Ad-RTS-hIL-12; Drug: veledimexUSA
4NCT03636477A Study of Ad-RTS-hIL-12 With Veledimex in Combination With Nivolumab in Subjects with Glioblastoma; a Substudy to ATI001-102Active, not recruitingIGlioblastoma Multiforme21Biological: Ad-RTS-hIL-12
Drug: veledimexDrug: Nivolumab		USA
5NCT03330197A Study of Ad-RTS-hIL-12 + Veledimex in Pediatric Subjects
with Brain Tumors Including DIPG		RecruitingI/IIPediatric Brain Tumor
Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma		45Biological: Ad-RTS-hIL-12
Oral Veledimex 		USA
6NCT03866109A Study Evaluating Temferon in Patients with Glioblastoma
& Unmethylated MGMT		RecruitingI/IIGlioblastoma Multiforme21TemferonIT
7NCT03383978Intracranial Injection of NK-92/5.28. z Cells in Patients with
Recurrent HER2-positive Glioblastoma		RecruitingIGlioblastoma Multiforme30Biological: NK-92/5.28.zDE
8NCT04165941Novel Gamma-Delta (γδ)T Cell Therapy for Treatment of Patients With Newly Diagnosed GlioblastomaRecruitingIBrain Tumor Adult12Biological: DRI cell therapyUSA
9NCT04214392Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T Cells with a Chlorotoxin Tumor- Targeting Domain for the Treatment of MPP2 + Recurrent or Progressive GlioblastomaRecruitingIRecurrent Glioblastoma
Recurrent Malignant Glioma Recurrent WHO Grade II Glioma
Recurrent WHO Grade III Glioma		36Biological: Chlorotoxin (EQ)-CD28-CD3zeta-CD19t-
expressing CAR T-lymphocytes		USA
10NCT02208362Genetically Modified T-cells in Treating Patients with Recurrent or Refractory Malignant GliomaRecruitingIBrain and Central Nervous System Tumors92IL13Ralpha2-specific Hinge-optimized 4-1BB-co-stimulatory CAR/Truncated CD19-expressing Autologous TN/MEM Cells; IL13Ralpha2-specific Hinge-optimized 41BB-co-stimulatory CAR Truncated CD19-expressing Autologous T-LymphocytesUSA
11NCT00730613Cellular Adoptive Immunotherapy Using Genetically Modified T-Lymphocytes in Treating Patients with Recurrent or Refractory High-Grade Malignant GliomaCompletedIBrain and Central Nervous System Tumors3Biological: therapeutic autologous lymphocytes Genetic: gene expression analysisNA
12NCT00005796Combination Chemotherapy Plus Gene Therapy
in Treating Patients with CNS Tumors		CompletedIBone Marrow Suppression
Brain and Central Nervous System Tumors		10Filgrastim, gene therapy, lomustine; procarbazine, vincristine sulfateUSA
13NCT02444546Wild-Type Reovirus in Combination with Sargramostim in Treating Younger Patients with High-Grade Relapsed or Refractory Brain TumorsActive, not recruitingIBrain and Central Nervous System Tumors6Biological: Sargramostim Biological: Wild-type ReovirusUSA
14NCT01082926Phase I Study of Cellular Immunotherapy for Recurrent/Refractory Malignant Glioma Using Intratumoral Infusions of GRm13Z40-2, An Allogeneic CD8 + Cytolitic T-Cell Line Genetically Modified to Express the IL 13-Zetakine and HyTK and to be Resistant to Glucocorticoids, in Combination with Interleukin-2CompletedIBrain and Central Nervous System Tumors6Biological: therapeutic allogeneic lymphocytes; Biological: aldesleukinUSA
Ad-RTS-hIL-12: Inducible Adenoviral Vector Engineered to express IL-12; CAR: Chimeric Antigen Receptor; CNS: Central Nervous System; DE: Germany; DIPG: Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma; GBM: Glioblastoma Multiforme; HyTK: Hybromycin Thymidine Kinase; IFN: Interferon; MGMT: 0-6-Methylguanine DNA-methyltransferase; MPP2: Palmitoylated membrane protein 2; NK: Natural Killer; Pts: Patients; WHO: World Health Organisation.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Giotta Lucifero, A.; Luzzi, S. Against the Resilience of High-Grade Gliomas: Gene Therapies (Part II). Brain Sci. 2021, 11, 976. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11080976

AMA Style

Giotta Lucifero A, Luzzi S. Against the Resilience of High-Grade Gliomas: Gene Therapies (Part II). Brain Sciences. 2021; 11(8):976. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11080976

Chicago/Turabian Style

Giotta Lucifero, Alice, and Sabino Luzzi. 2021. "Against the Resilience of High-Grade Gliomas: Gene Therapies (Part II)" Brain Sciences 11, no. 8: 976. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11080976

APA Style

Giotta Lucifero, A., & Luzzi, S. (2021). Against the Resilience of High-Grade Gliomas: Gene Therapies (Part II). Brain Sciences, 11(8), 976. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11080976

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop