Next Article in Journal
Development of the Morphology and the Band Gap Energy of Co–Si Nanofibers by Inserting Zirconium and Titanium with Dual Anions Intercalation Process
Previous Article in Journal
Editorial for Special Issue: Fishery Acoustics, Applied Sciences, and Practical Applications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Reconstruction of the Microstructure of Cyanate Ester Resin by Using Prepared Cyanate Ester Resin Nanoparticles and Analysis of the Curing Kinetics Using the Avrami Equation of Phase Change

Appl. Sci. 2019, 9(22), 4773;

Polyisobutylene-Based Thermoplastic Elastomers for Manufacturing Polymeric Heart Valve Leaflets: In Vitro and In Vivo Results
Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases, 650002 Kemerovo, Russia
Research Institute for Physical Chemical Problems of the Belarusian State University, 220030 Minsk, Belarus
Faculty of Chemistry, Belarusian State University, 220030 Minsk, Belarus
Institute of Regenerative Medicine, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia
OOO Angiolain, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 30 September 2019 / Accepted: 5 November 2019 / Published: 8 November 2019



Featured Application

The assessment of SIBS physical properties and hemocompatibility ensures the optimal choice of nanofillers or the introduction of a new molecule to eliminate its tendency towards viscoelastic creeping and poor strength. Obtained data have put the path forward in synthesizing superior material for manufacturing polymeric heart valve leaflets.


Superior polymers represent a promising alternative to mechanical and biological materials commonly used for manufacturing artificial heart valves. The study is aimed at assessing poly(styrene-block-isobutylene-block-styrene) (SIBS) properties and comparing them with polytetrafluoroethylene (Gore-texTM, a reference sample). Surface topography of both materials was evaluated with scanning electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy. The mechanical properties were measured under uniaxial tension. The water contact angle was estimated to evaluate hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity of the study samples. Materials’ hemocompatibility was evaluated using cell lines (Ea.hy 926), donor blood, and in vivo. SIBS possess a regular surface relief. It is hydrophobic and has lower strength as compared to Gore-texTM (3.51 MPa vs. 13.2/23.8 MPa). SIBS and Gore-texTM have similar hemocompatibility (hemolysis, adhesion, and platelet aggregation). The subcutaneous rat implantation reports that SIBS has a lower tendency towards calcification (0.39 mg/g) compared with Gore-texTM (1.29 mg/g). SIBS is a highly hemocompatible material with a promising potential for manufacturing heart valve leaflets, but its mechanical properties require further improvements. The possible options include the reinforcement with nanofillers and introductions of new chains in its structure.
polymeric heart valve leaflets; ABA block copolymers of isobutylene and styrene; biostability; hemocompatibility; physical and mechanical properties

1. Introduction

Valvular heart disease is a major cause of disability and premature mortality worldwide [1]. Clinically moderate or severe valvular heart disease will double before 2050 from 1.5 million in 2015 to 3.3 million in 2056 [2] resulting in a sharp increase of heart valve replacements, either surgical or transcatheter. To date, damaged native valves are replaced with mechanical and tissue heart valves. However, neither mechanical nor tissue prostheses are ideal [3,4]. Their implantation is associated with reduced quality of life. Mechanical prostheses require life-long anticoagulation therapy and are associated with a substantially high risk of bleedings [5]. Tissue heart valves are susceptible to calcification and degeneration resulting in the structural failure, requiring repeat surgery [6,7]. Numerous approaches have been proposed to solve the existing problem and develop a durable heart valve: tissue-engineering and hybrid materials [8,9,10], novel shape memory designs and magnetically triggered devices [11], bioinert ceramics [12], and polymeric materials with enhanced properties [13,14,15]. Tissue-engineered heart valves strive to overcome the limitations of mechanical and bioprosthetic valves, because they are living tissues capable of active remodeling and self-repair [16]. However, more studies are required to determine the optimal composition, manufacturing technique, and biofunctionalization of the selected scaffolds [17]. Functional properties of mechanical heart valves may be addressed by additional coatings able to change the roughness and wettability of the product and control the resultant hemocompatibility and biocompatibility [18,19]. Promising results have been shown by de Avila et al. who reported zirconia material to possess optimal properties for biofilm formation [20]. Though the data were presented for dental implants, they seem to be promising for developing artificial heart valve.
Recent advances in polymer synthesis and processing have opened new fronts for developing novel materials with unique morphology, mechanical, and physical properties. The ability to control the material properties has given the light to develop medical devices of given patterns to address compelling needs of various medical fields, including cardiothoracic surgery [21,22]. Thus, superior polymeric materials may ensure the development of artificial heart valves able to replicate native valve function and overcome major limitations of commercially available prostheses [23]. Optimal polymeric heart valves should combine the main advantages of tissue and mechanical heart valve prostheses. Despite that the concept of the polymeric heart valve is not new and dates back to the 1950s, it has been put forward again with technologically advanced polymer synthesis and processing. The variety of polymers was used to design optimal flexible leaflets: polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE and ePTFE) [24,25], silicone [26], polyurethanes [27], three-dimensionally cross-linked polyvinyl alcohol [28], POSS-PCU nanocomposite [29], copolymers based on styrene and isobutylene (SIBS) [30], and others. However, almost all of them have several drawbacks limiting them from successful clinical introduction.
Poly (Styrene-block-IsoButylene-block-Styrene) (SIBS) is a biostable thermoplastic elastomer with physical properties that overlap silicone rubber and polyurethane [31]. It was first developed in the Akron University, Ohio, USA in the late 1990s and was commercialized by Boston Scientific Corporation’s (BSC; Natick, MA, USA) in 2002. The development of the Drug Eluting TAXUS Coronary Stent reduced the rate of the bypass procedures with the subsequently improved rate of complications. Spurred by superior TAXUS results, Innovia LLC started working on its application for manufacturing polymeric heart valve able to mimic native valve and fully replicate its function. Original SIBS was reported to be highly hemocompatible material, but its poor physical properties forwarded the research groups towards its reinforcement. Galloher et al. assessed effective fiber reinforcement (Dacron vs. LARS®) to improve the fatigue resistance of SIBS by minimizing stress concentration in the matrix. LARS®-reinforced valve demonstrated superior physical properties over Dacron-reinforced valve, but they were still not enough to eradicate the main problem [32]. Wang et al. (2010) tested dimyristoyl phosphatidylcholine (DMPC) precoating of SIBS [33]. Despite good hemocompatibility, inferior functional properties limited its use for manufacturing polymeric heart valve potentially suitable for the clinical practice. Although several researches have been done on SIBS, no study to date has performed comprehensive assessment of its properties as a potential material for manufacturing heart valve leaflets and has compared with Gore-texTM, a benchmark material routinely used in the clinical practice.
Thus, our research is aimed at assessing physical properties, hemocompatibility and biocompatibility of SIBS to set reference range for selecting optimal nanofillers or functional fragments able to reinforce its structure, improve hemocompatibility and its application potential for manufacturing polymeric heart valve leaflets.
In order to achieve the set aim, we synthesized SIBS with Mn of 33,000 and compared its properties with Gore-texTM, a polymer that is routinely used for manufacturing medical devices for cardiothoracic surgery. Surface topography of both materials was described with scanning electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy. Uniaxial tension allowed describing the mechanical properties. The water contact angle was used to evaluate hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity of the study samples. Hemocompatibility was evaluated using cell lines (Ea.hy 926), donor blood, and in vivo.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. SIBS Synthesis

Stabilized styrene (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA, >99%) was treated with 10% KOH aqueous solution, repeatedly washed with water, dried first with CaCl2 and then with CaH2, and, finally, distilled two times over CaH2 under reduced pressure. Methylene chloride and hexane (both from Ekos-1, chemically pure grade) were treated with sulphuric acid, washed with aqueous sodium bicarbonate, dried over CaCl2, and distilled twice from CaH2 under an inert atmosphere Titanium tetrachloride (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA, 99.9%) was distilled before use. Isobutylene (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA; 99%) was dried in the gaseous state by passing through the column packed with drierite and condensed into the Schlenk tube. 2,6-Di(tert-butyl)pyridine (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA; 97%) and dicumyl alcohol (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA; 97%) were used as received. Dicumyl chloride was synthesized by passing gaseous HCl through solution of dicumyl alcohol in CH2Cl2 at 0 °C [34]. The purity of dicumyl chloride was conformed by 1H NMR spectroscopy to be >99%.
Triblock copolymer of isobutylene and styrene (SIBS) was synthesized by the living cationic polymerization according to the method reported by Mishra et al. [34]. Polymerization was performed under inert argon atmosphere in a three-necked flask. The reactor was consequently charged with dicumyl chloride (0.095 mmol), 25 mL of solvents (hexane-methylene chloride mixture 60:40 v/v), 2,6-di(tert-butyl)pyridine (0.20 mmol), and isobutylene (24 mmol) at −60 °C. Then, the reaction mixture was cooled to −80 °C and 1.9 mmol of titanium tetrachloride was added to initiate the polymerization. After 25 min since the beginning of the polymerization, 9.2 mmol of a preliminarily cooled 2.0 M solution of styrene in a hexane-methylene chloride mixture 60:40 v/v was added into the reactor. The reaction was quenched by 2.0 mL of prechilled methanol 50 min after the initiation. The product was precipitated twice into a tenfold excess of cooled ethanol. The cooled sample was separated by centrifugation, washed with a small amount of ethanol, and dried in a vacuum at 55–60 °C/2 mmHg to constant weight.
The structure of newly synthesized SIBS was identified with the differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The phase and relaxation transitions of the polymer were studied by differential scanning calorimetry on DSC 3+ (Mettler Toledo, Greifensee, Switzerland) with a liquid nitrogen cooling system in the range of −100–160 °C with a heating rate of 20 deg/min and a cooling rate of 20 deg/min and with a nitrogen flow of 50 mL/min. The first and second heating cycles were examined in thermograms, the glass transition temperature Tg was evaluated by analyzing the inflection point.
Number-average molecular weight and polydispersity of SIBS were determined by gel permeation chromatography (GPC). Measurements were performed using an Ultimate 3000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) device with a PLgel MIXED-C column (7.5 × 300 mm, particle size 5 μm, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) column and one precolumn (PLgel 5 μm Guard, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) thermostated at 30 °C. GPS traces were achieved using a refractometer or a UV-detector (λ = 255 nm). Tetrahydrofuran was used as a mobile phase with a flow rate of 1.0 mL min−1. The molecular weights and polydispersity were calculated based on polystyrene standards (EasiCal, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) with Mw/Mn ≤ 1.05 and using Chromeleon 7.0 program (Thermo Fisher Scientific Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA, USA).

2.2. SIBS and Gore-TexTM Samples

The SIBS films were solvent cast. 1,6 g of SIBS pellets were dissolved in 8 mL of chloroform (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA, ≥99%). The polymer solution was cast into a petri dish with the surface area of 21 cm. Slow evaporation was processed at room temperature for 1 h and at 35 °C for 3 h. The resultant films were then vacuum dried for 24 h at room temperature and pressure of <0.133 mbar using FREEZONE 2.5 (Labconco, Kansas City, MO, USA). The thickness of the obtained films was 240 μm.
A commercial thin-walled Gore-tex™ (Gore & Associates, Inc., Newark, DE, USA) stretch vascular graft (5 mm in diameter and 10 cm in length) was used as the reference sample to set the range of physical and hemocompatible properties that are required for a cardiovascular implant. Gore-tex™ is expanded PTFE with a microporous structure and a high strength-to-weight ratio, biocompatibility, and high thermal resistance. It is manufactured by means of a heating, stretching, and extruding process [35].

2.3. Mechanical Properties

SIBS and Gore-texTM samples were tested in uniaxial tension using a universal testing machine (Zwick/Roell, Zwick GmbH & Co. KG, Ulm, Germany) equipped with a 50 N load cell according to the editorial rules of the ISO 37: 2017. Given the absence of any reinforcing fillers, fibers, and particles, SIBS referred to the isotropy group of materials and did not require any specific considerations of its orientation mode. Ten SIBS samples were tested for one tensile direction. In contrast, Gore-texTM had remarkable anisotropy, and was cut in two mutually perpendicular directions, longitudinal and circumferential. Ten Gore-texTM samples were tested for each tensile directions. Both sets of samples were cut to dumbbells with the narrow portion of 2 mm and of 10 mm length using type 1A blade according to the ISO 37: 2017. Samples were then mounted in Vulkollan grips in the “Zwick/Roell” (Zwick GmbH & Co. KG, Ulm, Germany). Samples were subjected to one loading cycle of applied strain at a constant rate of 10 mm/min until rupture. The tensile strength was measured with the maximum tensile stress (MPa), taking into account the cross-section area of the samples. Elastic deformation was assessed with the relative elongation adjusted to the elongation at break (%) and Young’s modulus (MPa). The last was determined in the range of small deformations corresponding to the range of physiological loading.

2.4. Assessment of Surface Properties

Surface structure of samples was assessed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM). Tapping mode atomic force microscopy was performed under standard laboratory conditions. Samples were cut into 5 mm × 5 mm sizes, fixed on a flat metal tab and studied using a MultiMode 8 microscope (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) equipped with SNL-10 probes (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA).
Three SIBS and three Gore-texTM samples were cut into 5 mm × 5 mm sizes. Samples were then mounted on the tabs using conductive tape and gold/palladium (Au/Pd) coating sputtered with an EM ACE200 (Leica Mikrosysteme GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany). Scanning electron microscopy was performed using a S-3400N microscope (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). Secondary electron images were obtained at accelerating voltage of 5 kV and magnification of 5000.
The water contact angle was estimated using the sessile drop method. A drop of distilled water, approximately 15 μL, was dispensed on the flat platform and stabilized in during the same time for each measurement at room temperature. The obtained images were processed using the ImageJ Contact Angle plugin. The analysis was repeated eight times for each group of samples. An average contact angle with standard deviation (S.D.) was reported.

2.5. In Vitro Cytotoxicity and Cell Viability Assessment

The experiment was performed using the Ea.hy 926 cell line, a hybridoma made from human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) and a human lung carcinoma cell line. Cell culture plastic was used as a control in the experiments. Samples of sterile matrices (n = 5 each group, sterilized with ethylene oxide) were seeded with cells at a density of 2.0 × 105 cells/cm2 and cultured for 5 days in DME/F12 medium (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) containing 1% HEPES buffer (Hyclone, Logan, UT, USA), 10% fetal bovine serum (Sigma Aldrich, USA), 1% L-glutamine, 100 units/mL penicillin, 0.1 µg/mL streptomycin, 0.1 µg/mL amphotericin B, and hypoxanthine–aminopterin–thymidine (HAT; Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) at 37 °C and 5% CO2. The medium was changed every alternative once in 2 days. The absolute number of cells per 1 mm2 surface and the relative amount of dead cells were assessed using a fluorescence microscope (Axio Observer Z1, Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) after adding Hoechst 33342 nuclear fluorescent dyes (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA) in an amount of 2 μg/mL of ethidium bromide (EtBr; AppliChem, Darmstadt, Germany) at a concentration of 0.03 mg/mL. Cells were calculated in five different fields at a magnification of ×200 followed by a further counting under 1 mm2 of surface. The relative amount of dead cells was measured using the ratio of the absolute number of dead cells under 1 mm2 of surface to the absolute number of cells under 1 mm2 of surface. Cell proliferation was evaluated with sterile matrices (n = 5 each group) using Click-iT Plus EdU Imaging Kits (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA). Fluorescence microscopy was performed on an LSM 700 (Carl Zeiss) laser scanning microscope. The relative amount of proliferating cells was measured using the ratio of the absolute number of proliferating cells under 1 mm2 of surface to the absolute number of cells under 1 mm2 of surface.

2.6. In Vitro Calcification Assessment

Samples with width of 5 mm × 5 mm (n = 5 each group) were placed in 2 mL solution based on DMEM medium (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and serum albumin (FBS, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) containing CaCl2 and Na2HPO4 and kept in a CO2 incubator at 37 °C and 5% CO2. The degree of calcification was assessed 3 and 6 weeks after the incubation. Glutaraldehyde GA treated bovine xenopericardium (NeoCor, Russian Federation) was chosen as the positive control. Cryosections of the biomaterial and polymer samples were stained with alizarin red S (Reakhim, Moscow, Russian Federation) and evaluated with a light microscope (AXIO Imager A1 microscope, Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).

2.7. In Vivo Hemocompatibility Assessment

In vivo inflammatory response and calcification were evaluated with the study samples of 5 mm × 5 mm in size implanted subcutaneously into male Wistar rats each weighting 55–70 g for two weeks (tissue response, n = 5) and two months (tissue response, n = 5; calcification, n = 5). The study design was approved by the Local Ethics Committee of the Research Institute. The implants and surrounding tissues were excised once the experiment was completed and fixed in 4% formalin solution (MiniMed, Bryansk City, Russian Federation), then embedded in paraffin (Biovitrum, Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation). Sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (Biovitrum, Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation), according to Van Gieson (Biovitrum, Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation) and alizarin red S (Reakhim, Moscow, Russian Federation). Samples were viewed with a light microscope (AXIO Imager A1, Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). Inflammatory response was measured according to the editorial rules of the ISO 10993-6: 2016. The number of neovascularization foci was calculated in five different fields for each animal at a magnification of ×400. Fibrous capsule thickness (the mean ten equally distributed measurements of perpendicular distance starting at the capsule-implant interface and moving outward), fatty infiltrate, and the number of lymph nodes were calculated to evaluate tissue response. The rest samples were subjected to hydrolysis in perchloric acid solution followed by heating to assess the amount of calcium (in case of the Gore-texTM samples, calcifications formed during the experiment were present in the solution). The calcium content was measured with the inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry using an iCAP 6500 DUO spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). GA-treated bovine xenopericardium (NeoCor, Kemerovo, Russian Federation) was the positive control.

2.8. In Vitro Hemocompatibility Assessment

The testing was performed in accordance with the editorial rules of the ISO 10993-4:2017. Fresh human donor blood samples were collected in 3.8% sodium citrate solution (dilution, nine parts of freshly drawn blood to one part sodium citrate solution). The citrated blood was centrifuged at 1000 rpm at 25 °C room for 10 min to obtain platelet-rich plasma (PRP). Platelet-poor plasma (PPP) was obtained by centrifuging the citrated blood at 4000 rpm at room temperature. The polymer matrices from Gore-texTM (Gore-Tex, Gore & Associates, Inc., Newark, DE, USA) and polyethylene (LDPE) ERM-EC590 (Merck, Kenilworth, NJ, USA) were controls.

2.9. Degree of Hemolysis

Samples of 25 cm2 in size (n = 5 each material) were placed in the beakers, then 10 mL of physiological saline was added, and the beakers were placed in a thermostat at 37 °C for 120 min. 200 μL of citrated blood was added, mixed, and then kept for 60 min. After incubation, the solution was taken from the cups into tubes, followed by centrifugation at 2800 rpm for 10 min to precipitate red blood cells (RBCs). Saline and distilled water were used as negative and positive controls to assess the degree of hemolysis. The optical density of the solutions under study was measured at a wavelength of 545 nm using a GENESYS 6 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) [36,37].

2.10. Platelet Aggregation

Intact platelet-rich plasma was used as the positive control in assessing the impact of polymers on platelet aggregation. Spontaneous platelet activation was measured using a semi-automatic 4-channel platelet aggregation analyzer ARAST 4004 (LABiTec, Ahrensburg, Germany). To initiate spontaneous aggregation in citrate blood, Ca+2 ions were reduced; the prepared CaCl2 solution with a molar concentration of 0.25 M was used as a reagent. The ratio of the sample and reagent was 250 μL PRP + 25 μL CaCl2. The contact time of the samples with PRP was 3 min [37,38].

2.11. Platelet Adhesion

Polymer matrices sized 1 cm2 were incubated with 500 μL of PRP at 37 °C for 2 h, then gently rinsed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to remove non-adhered plasma components. Samples were then fixed in a 2% glutaraldehyde solution prepared in 0.1 M phosphate buffer for 6 h. Samples were dehydrated with ascending grades of alcohol (50%, 75%, 95%, and 100%). Platelet adhesion was measured using the scanning electron microscopy. Adhesive properties of the surface were evaluated in eight randomly selected fields of view using the deformation index [36,37,38].

2.12. Statistical Analysis

The statistical analysis was performed using commercially available software package STATISTICA 6.0 (StatSoft, Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA). The non-parametric Mann–Whitney U test was used to assess statistically significant differences between two independent groups. A p level of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Gel Permeation Chromatography

The final block copolymer had the number average molecular weight of Mn = 33000 and polydispersity (Mw/Mn) of 1.3. The formation of block copolymer was confirmed by the shifts of GPC trace into high molecular weight after the addition of styrene to living difunctional polyisobutylene (Figure 1). Moreover, the experimentally determined value of the number average molecular weight (Mn = 33,000 g/mol) is correlated well with theoretical one (Mn = 33,500 g/mol).

3.2. Differential Scanning Calorimetry

The formation of block-copolymer was also confirmed by DSC (Figure 2). DSC clearly showed the glass transition temperature for polyisobutylene middle block at −61.5 °C as well as less pronounced transition at 87.7 °C for polystyrene side blocks during the second heating run. The less pronounced glass transition for the polystyrene blocks was consistent with their low content in a triblock copolymer.

3.3. Physical and Mechanical Properties

Gore-texTM exceeded SIBS with a 6.6-fold increase in tensile strength for the longitudinal direction (p < 0.05) and a 4.6-fold for the circumferential direction (p < 0.05; Figure 3).
SIBS reported a 1.3- and a 3.0-fold increase in relative elongation at break and Young’s modulus for the longitudinal direction as compared to that of Gore-tex™ and a 3.4-fold increase in the relative elongation for the transverse direction (p < 0.05). No significant differences had been found in SIBS and Gore-tex™ Young’s modulus for the transverse direction (p = 0.62).

3.4. Surface Topography

Typical SEM and AFM images reported that both sides of SIBS samples (Figure 4C,D,G,H) had homogeneous patterns when compared with Gore-tex™ (Figure 4A,B,E,F) that had highly porous and regular structures (Figure 4). Importantly, the differences between the inner and outer surfaces of Gore-tex™ samples had been observed. The inner blood-contacting surface of Gore-tex™ was formed by large and porous structures as compared to its outer surface. None of these differences had been found for the inner and outer surfaces of SIBS.
The contact angles for the inner and outer surfaces of Gore-texTM were similar (p = 0.62) suggesting its high hydrophobicity (Figure 4I,J). The contact angles for the inner and outer surfaces of SIBS (Figure 4K,L) did not differ significantly (p = 0.62). However, values obtained were lower than those for the Gore-tex™ samples (p < 0.05). The study materials were classified as hydrophobic (contact angle >90).
The contact angles for the inner and outer surfaces of Gore-tex™ were similar (p = 0.62). Obtained values confirmed its high hydrophobicity (Figure 4). The contact angles for the inner and outer surfaces of SIBS did not differ significantly (p = 0.62). However, the obtained values were lower than those for Gore-tex™ (p < 0.05). Both materials, SIBS and Gore-texTM, were considered hydrophobic (contact angle >90).

3.5. In Vitro Biocompatibility

There were no significant differences (p = 0.20) found in cell adhesion (Figure 5A,B) between SIBS (588 cells mm2) and cell culture plastic (732 cells/mm2). The last was considered the gold standard for assessing cell adhesion in vitro. The absolute number of adhered cells to SIBS was three times higher than that for Gore-tex™ (212 cells/mm2; p < 0.001).
The relative number of viable Ea.hy 926 cells on different polymer matrices (Figure 5A,B) did not differ significantly (p = 0.56). SIBS and Gore-tex™ demonstrated the similar amounts of dead cells (4.40% vs. 4.72%, respectively; p = 0.93). However, cell culture plastic had a lower amount of dead cells than that of polymer matrices and accounted for 1.16% (Figure 5A; p < 0.05).
Poor cell proliferation on Gore-tex™ (0.10%) led to the failure of cell adhesion and proliferation (Figure 5A,B). SIBS demonstrated the highest proliferative activity of the Ea.hy 926 cell line (62.04%), which was 1.4-fold higher of that on cell culture plastic (44.00%, p < 0.05).

3.6. In Vitro Calcification

SIBS and Gore-texTM reported resistance to calcification (Figure 6B,C) in the in vitro model, whereas biomaterial demonstrated severe calcification during the experiment (Figure 6A).

3.7. Tissue Response in the Rat Model

Moderate macrophage response and the absence of giant cells were detected at day 14 after the implantation (Figure 7A–C). Lymph nodes in the surrounding tissues were found in all samples, suggesting the initiation of the inflammatory process. However, it was less pronounced in SIBS. Histological studies showed the formation of loose fibrous connective tissue of 69 μm thick covering Gore-tex™ samples. The thickness of fibrous connective tissue in GA-treated xenopericardium and SIBS was 50 μm and 98 μm, respectively. GA-treated xenopericardium had fatty infiltration surrounded by collagen fibers. All the samples had similar degree of neovascularization with mild capillary proliferation and one to three foci of neovascularization with fibroblast structures in the viewing field (×400 magnification). GA-treated xenopericardium and Gore-tex™ had cellular infiltration, particularly active in the former sample.
At 60 days following the implantation, dense connective tissue capsules consisting of collagen fibers with an average thickness of 42 μm for Gore-tex™ and 58 μm for SIBS were found in the surrounding tissues (Figure 7E,F). The capsule was not clearly visualized in the GA-treated xenopericardum sample. Gore-tex™ and GA-treated xenopericardium reported the presence of foreign body giant cells.
SIBS proved its biocompatibility as compared to the reference samples according to the semiquantitative assessment (ISO 10993-6:2016), based on the analysis of tissue response (neovascularization, fibrosis, fatty infiltration).

3.8. In Vivo Calcification

Histological studies showed active calcification of GA-treated xenopericardium samples (Figure 7G). Calcific deposits were found on the surface of Gore-tex™ samples (Figure 7I). Isolated calcific deposits formed within the connective tissue capsule in SIBS samples. The results of the quantitative assessment reported reliable differences in the calcium content between SIBS and Gore-tex™ samples (p < 0.05). A significant increase in the amount of calcium was reported for GA-treated xenopericardium samples (p < 0.05; Table 1).

3.9. Hemolysis

SIBS had lower proportion of lysed RBC as compared to Gore-tex™ (0.35% (min: 0.03; max: 0.60; 25%: 0.11; 75%: 0.40) vs. 0.4% (min: 0.11; max: 2.40; 25%: 0.31; 75%: 0.67), p < 0.05). RBC hemolysis after contacting with polyethylene was 1.82% (min: 1.16; max: 2.30; 25%: 1.41; 75%: 2.10). There were none significant differences found in the severity of hemolysis between two groups of polymers (SIBS and Gore-tex™; p = 0.57). However, reliable differences had been found between two groups of polymers (SIBS and Gore-tex™) as compared to polyethylene (p < 0.05).

3.10. Platelet Aggregation

The maximum platelet aggregation of intact platelet-rich plasma (positive control) was 8.6% (min: 7.79%; max: 15.91%; 25%: 8.02; 75%: 10.12%). The samples of platelet-rich plasma contacted with polyethylene showed platelet aggregation with a maximum peak of 73.40% (min: 67.73%; max: 82.74%; 25%: 72.35; 75%: 78.99%), whereas SIBS and Gore-tex™ had the maximum platelet aggregation of 18.11% (min: 16.40%; max: 23.78%; 25%: 16.66 75%: 20.42%) and 22.74% (min: 18.6%; max: 28.56%; 25%: 22.45; 75%: 24.52%), respectively. SIBS and Gore-tex™ had reliably lower maximum of platelet aggregation as compared to polyethylene (p < 0.05).

3.11. Platelet Adhesion

The deformity index of platelets adhered on the polyethylene surface was 3.61 (min: 2.0; max: 4.25; 25%: 2.82; 75%: 4.0; Figure 8). Platelets type IV were commonly found on its surface and accounted for 61.29% of the total number of adhered platelets. The deformity index of platelets adhered on the SIBS surface was 3.25 (min: 2.1; max: 4.0; 25%: 3.06; 75%: 3.69). Platelets type II–III prevailed on its surface and accounted for 61.63% and 8.4% of the total number of adhered platelets. The deformity index of platelets adhered to the Gore-tex™ surface was 3.76 (min: 3.0; max: 4.09; 25%: 3.29; 75%: 3.96). Platelets type III and type IV were commonly found on the Gore-tex™ surface and accounted for 41.54% and 26.76%, respectively.
There were none statistically significant differences found in the deformity indices of platelets adhered on SIBS and Gore-tex™ as compared to polyethylene (p = 0.54 and p = 0.72, respectively).

4. Discussion

The development of polymeric heart leaflets requires the use of polymers with superior hemocompatible properties as well as those yielding the best physical and mechanical properties. Molecular and supramolecular architectures are of key importance and drive the choice of the proper polymer. All these requirements encourage the researchers to use co-polymeric materials and composite materials, particularly in biomedicine, due to their unique properties and the ability to combine structural fragments of various functional groups [13,39]. A particular attention should be paid to styrene and isobutylene block copolymers as promising materials since they are thermoplastic, elastic, possess high strength, and are resistant to hydrolytic and oxidative effects due to the carbon chain, biological inertness of the backbone and side chains (Figure 9) [40].
There are three research groups developing flexible polymeric heart valves and leaflets from original or modified SIBS (i.e., with reinforced structure, added molecules, or following phospholipid modification) [30,33,41]. However, the existing commercial SIBS has some specific disadvantages, including viscoelastic creeping and a tendency to thrombi formation [31,42]. In order to meet the demands of cardiovascular surgery, it should possess unique properties [43]. By combining structural fragments of various types, we may obtain polymers with given patterns materials, i.e., hemocompatibility, biostability, increased strength, and optimal elasticity as compared with homopolymers [44]. We used the cationic polymerization method to synthesize SIBS with the preferred properties. This is the only method ensuring a simple introduction of additional units into the structure of the polymer molecule that can drastically improve the properties of the resultant material [45]. First, we analyzed the molecular weight characteristics of the polymer produced under the given conditions to assess the optimal parameters for the synthesis of a new molecule. Then, we synthesized the polymer with the number average molecular weight (Mn) of 33,000 and polydispersity (Mw/Mn) of 1.3 (Figure 1). Gore-texTM was chosen as a control because it is currently applied in the real clinical practice when compared with other polymers undergoing experimental testing.
The mechanical properties of each block copolymer may vary depending on its molecular weight, the percentage of the constituent blocks, and the sequence of the polymer chain [46]. The strength of SIBS was lower than that of Gore-tex™. Despite the superior tensile strength of SIBS that exceeds the tensile strength of the native tissues (heart and vessels), it is worth considering that synthetic materials are not capable of regeneration. As a result, the accumulated fatigue stress can lead to the destruction of the material structure. It means that an optimal material should possess a significant margin of safety [36]. Due to this, the majority of researchers used SIBS polymers with Mn of 60,000 or even more [36,46] with the ultimate tensile strength (MPa) of 10–30 and the ultimate elongation of 300–1100% [31]. However, a separate study covering this issue is required to enable the choice of the optimal molecular weight. The elasticity modulus in the physiological range of loading is considered as one of the key properties of the mechanical behavior of the material. It determines the suitability of the selected material to be used for developing artificial heart valves. More rigid polymers have a lower tendency to accumulate fatigue stress, but high rigidity of the leaflets may lead to significant hemodynamic alterations [37]. In our experiment SIBS demonstrated moderate rigidity between the biological material [38] and Gore-texTM. The elasticity of the leaflets ensures minimal energy losses during deformation of the heart valve under the pulsatile blood flow. Therefore, elastic and deformation properties should be considered as one of the main parameters in the decision-making process. Rigidity and elasticity can vary depending on the mass fraction of styrene in the polymer. An increase in rigidity and decrease in elongation is associated with increased styrene rate, and vice versa [46]. SIBS synthesized in this study demonstrated promising results in terms of rigidity. However, its structure may be altered in case elasticity may require the further optimization.
Hydrophobic surfaces are less hemocompatible, since they have a greater tendency to irreversible adsorption of proteins, including the resultant conformational changes, unlike hydrophilic surfaces, which minimally affect the conformation of proteins [40]. Hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity determines the subsequent adhesion of blood cells and cell proliferation [47]. However, there is some evidence on using of hydrophobic biomaterials in cardiovascular implants, particularly Gore-texTM in artificial heart valve leaflets, in clinical practice [48]. Our experimental data demonstrated the superiority of SIBS over Gore-texTM suggesting the former beneficial potential for the application in the clinical practice. Our results are also consistent with the recent studies [49]. Since both types of blocks are hydrophobic, hydrophilicity of the SIBS surface may be increased by adding hydrophilic groups (for example, hydroxyl) or by surface modification [49]. At the same time, the need for such modification may be confirmed by the results of hemocompatibility tests, since the process of contacting with blood is known to be a multifactorial one. The surface properties of the implanted material may also affect its hemocompatibility. Smoother surfaces with regular structures are more biocompatible due to their ability to reduce the severity of the inflammatory process and the adhesion of blood cells [50,51]. SIBS demonstrated rather good biostability since there are no gas inclusions accelerating its biodegradation. The more pronounced porosity of the Gore-tex™ sample and its previously reported biocompatibility as compared to the SIBS sample suggest the superior potential of the last according to the surface relief. We might conclude that cast molding with chloroform as a solvent for manufacturing SIBS heart valve prostheses is comparable to THF casting and melting, the well-described methods in the literature [52].
High hemocompatibility of SIBS and Gore-tex™ was confirmed by cytotoxicity testing using HUVEC cell line. The preceding experiments with the L929 cell line (mouse fibroblasts) [53] also showed high cell viability on the Kaneka SIBS material. However, we used the HUVEC cell line as it suited more to the objectives of this study. The cell proliferative potential index can complement the functional activity of cells in short-term experiments, which are not able to demonstrate the full range of changes in cell viability [54]. The ability of cell adhesion and proliferation is critical for tissue-engineered heart valves, a novel trend that has recently emerged. Taking into account the obtained results, we concluded that SIBS has superior potential for the further use in the development of tissue-engineered structures unlike Gore-texTM. Moreover, SIBS has higher capacity for spontaneous endothelization. Recent literature data suggest that the presence of the methyl groups in the polymer compound structure does not contribute to the proliferation of cells adhered on the material surface [55].
Dense fibrous (connective tissue) capsule formation around the SIBS and Gore-tex™ samples indicates the completion of the inflammatory process following the 60-day implantation of the biostable materials. However, the fibrous capsule around the SIBS sample was thicker than that for the Gore-tex™ sample. The obtained results were consistent with the results of other experiments [52]. Therefore, the molecular weight of the polymer and the structural quantitative composition of the block copolymer did not affect the biocompatibility of the polymer in the short-term experiments. Connective tissue is formed around the artificial heart valve leaflets creating a protective barrier, separating foreign material from the body environment. Moreover, it ensures a tight connection with the aortic root to prevent paravalvular regurgitation and secure the device fixation. Foreign body giant cells visualized in the Gore-tex™ and GA-treated xenopericardium samples may secrete reactive oxygen species and other chemical agents, contributing to oxidative damage and destruction of the implanted devices [56]. There were no such cells found in the SIBS sample 60 days after the implantation. The biocompatibility of SIBS most likely is related to a thin (10 nm) layer of pure polyisobutylene covering the polymer surface contacting with biological tissues, while the polystyrene phases are buried within the material [57]. High biocompatibility of SIBS and Gore-texTM has recently been confirmed in the experimental and clinical studies [48,58].
Calcification is the principal cause leading to stenosis of native and tissue aortic valves [6]. Polymers, unlike biological tissue, do not contain phosphorus-rich cellular garbage and destroyed collagen provoking the mineralization process. Therefore, they are more resistant to calcification. Our results demonstrated the absence of calcium crystals provoking calcification in the studied polymer samples. The results of the quantitative analysis of calcium content in the in vivo model reported higher calcium content in GA-treated xenopericardium (the positive control) as compared to the polymer materials. Our finding was consistent with the literature data [59]. Gore-tex™ demonstrated the presence of calcific deposits at the interface between the fibrous capsule and the polymer, while SIBS had isolated calcium crystals within the connective tissue capsule [60]. The obtained results suggest superiority of SIBS to Gore-tex™ in terms of minimal calcification rate, stating the benefits of the former for manufacturing synthetic heart valve prosthesis.
The evaluation of the level of RBC hemolysis induced by SIBS demonstrated the absence of toxic effects on RBCs. Gore-tex™, being the control sample, did not cause the destruction of RBC membrane. The level of RBC hemolysis after direct contact with polyethylene was 1.82%, suggesting its thrombogenicity. The obtained data are consistent with the results of other studies on the impact of SIBS and Gore-texTM on RBC hemolysis. The level of RBC hemolysis after contact with Gore-texTM was also significantly lower than those for the positive control with 100% hemolysis [41,61]. The cationic polymerization method used to synthesize the block copolymer ensures the safety of the produced medical materials as it provides a high degree of monomer conversion. Moreover, none of the solvents and catalytic residues were identified in the resultant material after isolation procedure. Platelet adhesion is the initial stage of blood clot formation. Importantly, adhesion alone is not enough to trigger the thrombogenic cascade. Activated platelets are able to release substances into the blood that can lead to irreversible aggregation. The adhesion of platelets with a regular round shape that have not yet been deformed, does not carry a thrombogenic hazard, since the adsorption of platelets type I is reversible and they can be easily returned to the bloodstream [62]. Our results on the assessment of adhesion properties showed that platelets adhere to all polymers, regardless of their type. The mechanism of platelet adhesion on the surface of the studied materials can be determined through the potential difference of polymers and platelets, and platelet adhesion can follow the adhesion of protein components of the blood, in this case, the hydrophobicity of polymers plays a crucial role [4]. The presence of methyl groups (-CH3) and the styrene benzene ring in the SIBS structure may provoke both protein adhesion and platelet adhesion [56]. Measurement of the aggregation activity of SIBS and Gore-tex™ polymers showed statistically significant advantage over polyethylene. Polyethylene, being the positive control in this experiment, caused a significant increase in the level of aggregation as compared to SIBS and Gore-tex™. Apparently, polyethylene releases substances that irritate blood platelet and lead to the activation of the last followed by the release of aggregation inducers.
Our results confirm that no residual monomer components and catalysts were found in the resultant material. Hemolysis, adhesion, and platelet aggregation demonstrated high hemocompatibility of SIBS as compared to Gore-tex™. However, its mechanical properties require further improvement and may be addressed through the introduction of nanofillers or a new molecule in the chemical structure.

5. Conclusions

SIBS with Mn of 33,000 demonstrated similar hemocompatibility and biocompatibility to SIBS with Mn of 60,000–150,000. The properties of our polymer were superior over Gore-texTM routinely used in the clinical practice. However, it was inferior in terms of mechanical properties. Obtained findings proved that its beneficial potential might be improved by increasing the ultimate tensile strength and uniform elongation through the nanofiller introduction or through an increase in the molecular weight of the block copolymer and/or modification of the central polyisobutylene block due to the introduction of methyl styrene units. SIBS modification enables the material to replicate native leaflet functions with a minimal risk for perforations, leaflet stress accumulation, ruptures, and tears.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.O. and L.B.; Methodology, M.R., P.N., S.K.; Software, K.K.; Investigation, E.O., M.R., P.N., S.K., T.G., L.A., T.A., D.S., E.K., K.K., D.T.; Resources, Y.K.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, E.O., M.R., P.N., S.K., K.K.; Writing—Review and Editing, E.O., M.R., P.N., L.B.; Supervision, E.O., P.N., S.K., L.B.; Project Administration, E.O.


The research was funded by a grant from the Russian Science Foundation (project No. 18-75-10061).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. Chen, Y.; Yiu, K.H. Growing importance of valvular heart disease in the elderly. J. Thorac. Dis. 2016, 8, E1701–E1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. D’Arcy, J.L.; Coffey, S.; Loudon, M.A.; Kennedy, A.; Pearson-Stuttard, J.; Birks, J.; Frangou, E.; Farmer, A.J.; Mant, D.; Wilson, J.; et al. Large-scale community echocardiographic screening reveals a major burden of undiagnosed valvular heart disease in older people: The OxVALVE Population Cohort Study. Eur. Heart J. 2016, 37, 3515–3522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Manji, R.A.; Ekser, B.; Menkis, A.H.; Cooper, D.K.C. Bioprosthetic heart valves of the future. Xenotransplantation 2014, 21, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Jaffer, I.H.; Whitlock, R.P. A mechanical heart valve is the best choice. Heart Asia 2016, 8, 62–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Poli, D.; Antonucci, E.; Pengo, V.; Migliaccio, L.; Testa, S.; Lodigiani, C.; Coffetti, N.; Facchinetti, R.; Serricchio, G.; Falco, P.; et al. Italian Federation of Anticoagulation Clinics. Mechanical prosthetic heart valves: Quality of anticoagulation and thromboembolic risk. The observational multicenter PLECTRUM study. Int. J. Cardiol. 2018, 267, 68–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lee, S.; Levy, R.J.; Christian, A.J.; Hazen, S.L.; Frick, N.E.; Lai, E.K.; Grau, J.B.; Bavaria, J.E.; Ferrari, G. Calcification and Oxidative Modifications Are Associated with Progressive Bioprosthetic Heart Valve Dysfunction. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2017, 6, e005648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cartlidge, T.R.G.; Doris, M.K.; Sellers, S.L.; Pawade, T.A.; White, A.C.; Pessotto, R.; Kwiecinski, J.; Fletcher, A.; Alcaide, C.; Lucatelli, C.; et al. Detection and Prediction of Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Degeneration. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2019, 73, 1107–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yang, J.M.; Olanrele, O.S.; Zhang, X.; Hsu, C.C. Fabrication of Hydrogel Materials for Biomedical Applications. In Novel Biomaterials for Regenerative Medicine (Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology); Chun, H., Park, K., Kim, C.H., Khang, G., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2018; Volume 1077, pp. 197–224. [Google Scholar]
  9. Hasan, A.; Soliman, S.; El Hajj, F.; Tseng, Y.T.; Yalcin, H.C.; Marei, H.E. Fabrication and In Vitro Characterization of a Tissue Engineered PCL-PLLA Heart Valve. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 8187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Demetzos, C.; Pippa, N. (Eds.) Thermodynamics and Biophysics of Biomedical Nanosystems: Applications and Practical Considerations; Springer: Singapore, 2019; p. 475. [Google Scholar]
  11. Cohn, D.; Sloutski, A.; Elyashiv, A.; Varma, V.B.; Ramanujan, R. In situ generated medical devices. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2019, 8, 1801066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Piconi, C. Bioinert Ceramics: State-of-the-Art. Key Eng. Mater. 2017, 758, 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Vellayappan, M.V.; Balaji, A.; Subramanian, A.P.; John, A.A.; Jaganathan, S.K.; Murugesan, S.; Mohandas, H.; Supriyanto, E.; Yusof, M. Tangible nanocomposites with diverse properties for heart valve application. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2015, 16, 033504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Rozeik, M.M.; Wheatley, D.J.; Gourlay, T. Investigating the Suitability of Carbon Nanotube Reinforced Polymer in Transcatheter Valve Applications. Cardiovasc. Eng. Technol. 2017, 8, 357–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Fan, X.; Yang, J.; Loh, X.J.; Li, Z. Polymeric Janus Nanoparticles: Recent Advances in Synthetic Strategies, Materials Properties, and Applications. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2019, 40, e1800203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Amadeus, S.Z.; Grande-Allen, K.J. Heart valve tissue engineering for valve replacement and disease modeling. Curr. Opin. Biomed. Eng. 2018, 5, 35–41. [Google Scholar]
  17. Blum, K.M.; Drews, J.D.; Breuer, C.K. Tissue-Engineered Heart Valves: A Call for Mechanistic Studies. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 2018, 24, 240–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zeng, H.; Jarvik, R.; Catausan, G.; Moldovan, N.; Carlisle, J. Diamond coated artificial cardiovascular devices. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2016, 302, 420–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bogacz, W.; Lemanowicz, M.; Al-Rashed, M.H.; Nakonieczny, D.; Piotrowski, T.; Wójcik, J. Impact of roughness, wettability and hydrodynamic conditions on the incrustation on stainless steel surfaces. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2017, 112, 352–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. De Avila, E.D.; Avila-Campos, M.J.; Vergani, C.E.; Spolidório, D.M.; de Assis Mollo, F., Jr. Structural and quantitative analysis of a mature anaerobic biofilm on different implant abutment surfaces. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2016, 115, 428–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Singhal, P.; Adriana, L.; Butany, J. Bioprosthetic Heart Valves: Impact of Implantation on Biomaterials. ISRN Biomater. 2014, 2013, 728791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hasan, A.; Ragaert, K.; Swieszkowski, W.; Selimovic, S.; Paul, A.; Camci-Unal, G.; Mofrad, M.R.K.; Khademhosseini, A. Biomechanical properties of native and tissue engineered heart valve constructs. J. Biomech. 2014, 47, 1949–1963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Rotman, O.M.; Kovarovic, B.; Chiu, W.C.; Bianchi, M.; Marom, G.; Slepian, M.J.; Bluestein, D. Novel Polymeric Valve for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Applications: In Vitro Hemodynamic Study. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2019, 47, 113–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Quintessenza, J.A.; Jacobs, J.P.; Chai, P.J.; Morell, V.O.; Lindberg, H. Polytetrafluoroethylene bicuspid pulmonary valve implantation: Experience with 126 patients. World J. Pediatric. Congenit. Heart Surg. 2010, 1, 20–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Hawreliak, J.A.; Lind, J.; Maddox, B.; Barham, M.; Messner, M.; Barton, N.; Jensen, B.J.; Kumar, M. Dynamic Behavior of Engineered Lattice Materials. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 28094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Chetta, G.E.; Lloyd, J.R. The design, fabrication and evaluation prosthetic heart valve. J. Biomech. Eng. 1980, 102, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Daebritz, S.H.; Fausten, B.; Hermanns, B.; Franke, A.; Schroeder, J.; Groetzner, J.; Autschbach, R.; Messmer, B.J.; Sachweh, J.S. New flexible polymeric heart valve prostheses for the mitral and aortic positions. Heart Surg. Forum 2004, 7, 525–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jiang, H.; Campbell, G.; Boughner, D.; Wand, W.K.; Quantz, M. Design and manufacture of a polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) cryogel tri-leaflet heart valve prosthesis. Med. Eng. Phys. 2004, 26, 269–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kidane, A.G.; Burriesci, G.; Edirisinghe, M.; Ghanbari, H.; Bonhoeffer, P.; Seifalian, A.M. A novel nanocomposite polymer for development of synthetic heart valve leaflets. Acta Biomater. 2009, 5, 2409–2417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Claiborne, T.E.; Sheriff, J.; Kuetting, M.; Steinseifer, U.; Slepian, M.J.; Bluestein, D.J. In vitro evaluation of a novel hemodynamically optimized trileaflet polymeric prosthetic heart valve. Biomech. Eng. 2013, 135, 021021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Pinchuk, L.; Wilson, G.J.; Barry, J.J.; Schoephoerster, R.T.; Parel, J.M.; Kennedy, J.P. Medical applications of poly(styrene-block-isobutylene-block-styrene) (“SIBS”). Biomaterials 2008, 29, 448–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yin, W.; Gallocher, S.; Pinchuk, L.; Schoephoerster, R.T.; Jesty, J.; Bluestein, D. Flow-induced Platelet Activation in a St. Jude Mechanical Heart Valve, a Trileaflet Polymeric Heart Valve, and a St. Jude Tissue Valve. Artif. Organs 2005, 29, 826–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, Q.; McGoron, A.J.; Bianco, R.; Kato, Y.; Pinchuk, L.; Schoephoerster, R.T. In-vivo assessment of a novel polymer (SIBS) trileaflet heart valve. J. Heart Valve Dis. 2010, 19, 499–505. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  34. Mishra, M.K.; Sar-Mishra, B.; Kennedy, J.P. New telechelic polymers and sequential copolymers by polyfunctional initiator-transfer agents (inifers) LI. Synthesis and characterization of anisole-terminated polyisobutylenes. Polym. Bull. 1986, 16, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Xue, L.; Greisler, H.P. Biomaterials in the development and future of vascular grafts. J. Vasc. Surg. 2003, 37, 472–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Zhang, Y.; Tran, R.T.; Gyawali, D.; Yang, J. Development of Photocrosslinkable Urethane-Doped Polyester Elastomers for Soft Tissue Engineering. Int. J. Biomater. Res. Eng. 2011, 1, 18–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ayoub, S.; Ferrari, G.; Gorman, R.C.; Gorman, J.H.; Schoen, F.J.; Sacks, M.S. Heart Valve Biomechanics and Underlying Mechanobiology. Compr. Physiol. 2016, 6, 1743–1780. [Google Scholar]
  38. Aguiari, P.; Fiorese, M.; Iop, L.; Gerosa, G.; Bagno, A. Mechanical testing of pericardium for manufacturing prosthetic heart valves. Interact Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg. 2016, 22, 72–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bianco, A.; Di Federico, E.; Cacciotti, I. Electrospun poly(ε-caprolactone)-based composites using synthesized β-tricalcium phosphate. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2011, 22, 1832–1841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Falde, E.J.; Yohe, S.T.; Colson, Y.L.; Grinstaff, M.W. Superhydrophobic materials for biomedical applications. Biomaterials 2016, 104, 87–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Brubert, J.; Krajewski, S.; Wendel, H.P.; Nair, S.; Stasiak, J.; Moggridge, G.D. Hemocompatibility of styrenic block copolymers for use in prosthetic heart valves. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2016, 27, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bezuidenhout, D.; Williams, D.F.; Zilla, P. Polymeric heart valves for surgical implantation, catheter-based technologies and heart assist devices. Biomaterials 2015, 36, 6–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lam, M.T.; Wu, J.C. Biomaterial applications in cardiovascular tissue repair and regeneration. Expert Rev. Cardiovasc. Ther. 2012, 10, 1039–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Bhushan, B.; Schricker, S.R. A review of block copolymer-based biomaterials that control protein and cell interactions. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2014, 102, 2467–2480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Wang, W.; Lu, W.; Goodwin, A.; Wang, H.; Yin, P.; Kang, N.-G.; Hong, K.; Mays, J.W. Recent Advances in Thermoplastic Elastomers from Living Polymerizations: Macromolecular Architectures and Supramolecular Chemistry. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2019, 95, 1–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Storey, R.F.; Chisholmt, B.J. Morphology and physical properties of poly (styrene-b-isobutylene-b-styrene) block copolymers. Polymer 1996, 37, 2925–2938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Vogler, E.A. Protein adsorption in three dimensions. Biomaterials 2012, 33, 1201–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Nosal, M.; Poruban, R.; Valentík, P.; Sagat, M.; Nagi, A.S.; Kantorova, A. Initial experience with polytetrafluoroethylene leaflet extensions for aortic valve repair. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2012, 41, 1255–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yuan, S.; Li, Y.; Luan, S.; Shi, H.; Yan, S.; Yin, J. Infection-resistant styrenic thermoplastic elastomers that can switch from bactericidal capability to anti-adhesion. J. Mater. Chem. B 2016, 4, 1081–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ulery, B.D.; Nair, L.S.; Laurencin, C.T. Biomedical Applications of Biodegradable Polymers. J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Phys. 2011, 49, 832–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chung, T.W.; Liu, D.Z.; Wang, S.Y.; Wang, S.S. Enhancement of the growth of human endothelial cells by surface roughness at nanometer scale. Biomaterials 2003, 24, 4655–4661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Fray, M.E.; Prowans, P.; Puskas, J.E.; Altsta, V. Biocompatibility and Fatigue Properties of Polystyrene-Polyisobutylene-Polystyrene, an Emerging Thermoplastic Elastomeric Biomaterial. Biomacromolecules 2006, 7, 844–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Yuan, S.; Li, Z.; Zhao, J.; Luan, S.; Ma, J.; Song, L.; Shi, H.; Jin, J.; Yin, J. Enhanced biocompatibility of biostable poly(styrene-b-isobutylene-b-styrene) elastomer via poly(dopamine)-assisted chitosan/hyaluronic acid immobilization. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 31481–31488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lu, S.; Zhang, P.; Sun, X.; Gong, F.; Yang, S.; Shen, L.; Huang, Z.; Wang, C. Synthetic ePTFE grafts coated with an anti-CD133 antibody-functionalized heparin/collagen multilayer with rapid in vivo endothelialization properties. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 7360–7369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Thevenot, P.; Hu, W.; Tang, L. Surface chemistry influences implant biocompatibility. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2008, 8, 270–280. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  56. Wiggins, M.J.; Wilkoff, B.; Anderson, J.M.; Hiltner, A. Biodegradation of polyether polyurethane inner insulation in bipolar pacemaker leads. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2001, 58, 302–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Knoll, A.; Magerle, R.; Krausch, G. Tapping Mode Atomic Force Microscopy on Polymers: Where Is the True Sample Surface? Macromolecules 2001, 34, 4159–4165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Claiborne, T.E.; Slepian, M.J.; Hossainy, S.; Bluestein, D. Polymeric trileaflet prosthetic heart valves: Evolution and path to clinical reality. Expert Rev. Med. Devices 2012, 9, 577–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Jee, K.S.; Kim, Y.S.; Park, K.D.; Kim, Y.H. A novel chemical modification of bioprosthetic tissues using L-arginine. Biomaterials 2003, 24, 3409–3416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hilbert, S.; Ferrans, V.; Tomita, Y.; Eidbo, E.; Jones, M. Evaluation of explanted polyurethane trileaflet cardiac valve prostheses. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1987, 94, 419–429. [Google Scholar]
  61. Kakavand, M.; Yazdanpanah, G.; Ahmadiani, A.; Niknejad, H. Blood compatibility of human amniotic membrane compared with heparin-coated ePTFE for vascular tissue engineering. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2017, 11, 1701–1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ye, X.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, M.; Cai, L. Hemocompatibility research on the micro-structure surface of a bionic heart valve. Biomed. Mater. Eng. 2014, 24, 2361–2369. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Typical gel permeation chromatography (GPC) curves of the samples.
Figure 1. Typical gel permeation chromatography (GPC) curves of the samples.
Applsci 09 04773 g001
Figure 2. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) curves based on the heat flux versus temperature (two heating runs and controlled cooling).
Figure 2. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) curves based on the heat flux versus temperature (two heating runs and controlled cooling).
Applsci 09 04773 g002
Figure 3. Mechanical properties of the study samples: stress (MPa), strain (%), ultimate tensile strength (UTS, MPa), and uniform elongation (%).
Figure 3. Mechanical properties of the study samples: stress (MPa), strain (%), ultimate tensile strength (UTS, MPa), and uniform elongation (%).
Applsci 09 04773 g003
Figure 4. Typical AFM (AD), SEM (EH), and contact angle (IL) images of Gore-tex™ and SIBS.
Figure 4. Typical AFM (AD), SEM (EH), and contact angle (IL) images of Gore-tex™ and SIBS.
Applsci 09 04773 g004
Figure 5. (A) Fluorescence microscopy of Gore-tex™, SIBS, and control (cell culture plastic) with cells: staining for cell viability, ×200, staining for proliferation, ×200. (B) Absolute number of cells, relative number of viable cells, relative number of proliferating cells Ea.hy 926 on the polymer surfaces.
Figure 5. (A) Fluorescence microscopy of Gore-tex™, SIBS, and control (cell culture plastic) with cells: staining for cell viability, ×200, staining for proliferation, ×200. (B) Absolute number of cells, relative number of viable cells, relative number of proliferating cells Ea.hy 926 on the polymer surfaces.
Applsci 09 04773 g005
Figure 6. Typical light microscopy, calcification assessed in the in vitro model, 6-week incubation period; materials under study: (A) GA-treated bovine xenopericardium, (B) SIBS, and (C) Gore-tex™, ×100 magnification.
Figure 6. Typical light microscopy, calcification assessed in the in vitro model, 6-week incubation period; materials under study: (A) GA-treated bovine xenopericardium, (B) SIBS, and (C) Gore-tex™, ×100 magnification.
Applsci 09 04773 g006
Figure 7. Histological sections (×200) of (A,D,G) GA-treated xenopericardium, (B,E,H) SIBS, and (C,F,I) Gore-tex™ following (AC) the two-week and (DF) two-month implantation into rats. The samples were stained with (AF) hematoxylin–eosin and (GI) alizarin red S.
Figure 7. Histological sections (×200) of (A,D,G) GA-treated xenopericardium, (B,E,H) SIBS, and (C,F,I) Gore-tex™ following (AC) the two-week and (DF) two-month implantation into rats. The samples were stained with (AF) hematoxylin–eosin and (GI) alizarin red S.
Applsci 09 04773 g007
Figure 8. Platelet adhesion on the surface of polymer matrices made from (A,D) polyethylene, (B,E) SIBS, and (C,F) Gore-tex™.
Figure 8. Platelet adhesion on the surface of polymer matrices made from (A,D) polyethylene, (B,E) SIBS, and (C,F) Gore-tex™.
Applsci 09 04773 g008
Figure 9. ABA block copolymers of isobutylene and styrene, structural formula.
Figure 9. ABA block copolymers of isobutylene and styrene, structural formula.
Applsci 09 04773 g009
Table 1. Calcium content in the samples, mg/g.
Table 1. Calcium content in the samples, mg/g.
GA-treated xenopericardium1.772.5793.79155.30159.80

© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (
Back to TopTop