Numerical and Experimental Investigations on Reducing Particle Accumulation for SCR-deNO_x Facilities

Abstract

Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) is widely used to remove nitrogen oxides (NO_x) in the flue gas of coal-fired power plants. The accumulation of ash particles inside the SCR-deNO_x facility will increase the risk of catalyst deactivation or even damage. This paper presents the numerical and experimental investigations on the particle dispersal approach for the SCR-deNO_x facility of a 1000 MW coal-fired power plant. The accumulation of different-sized particles is evaluated based on computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. To prevent particles from accumulation, an optimized triangular deflector is proposed and attempts are made to find out the optimal installing position of the deflector. For the π-type SCR-deNO_x facilities, the particle accumulation predominantly occurred on one side of the catalysts’ entrance, which corresponds to the inner side of the wedge-shaped turning. It is indicated that particles larger than 8.8 × 10⁻² mm are responsible for the significant accumulation. The triangular deflector is proved to be an effective way to reduce particle accumulation and is found most efficient when it is installed at the high-speed area of the vertical duct. Flow model test (FMT) is carried out to validate the dispersal effect for the particle with relatively large sizes and the optimal installing position of the triangular deflector.

1. Introduction

Coal-fired power plants are the major contributors to the emission of nitrogen oxides (NO_x). NO_x is not only responsible for the formation of acid rain and ozone layer weakening but also the potential inducement for respiratory diseases of human beings [1,2]. According to the Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR) released by the European Commission, in the past 40 years, global emissions of NO_x increased from 68 to 122 megatons [3,4]. In Europe, energy production and distribution accounts for 19.48% of the total NO_x emission. For new, large gas- and coal-fired power plants, the NO_x emission limits are set to be 50–100 mg/Nm³ and 150–200 mg/Nm³, respectively [4,5,6,7]. In 2015, the NO_x emission in China was 18.52 megatons [8,9]. Following the ultra-low emission standard of China, the NO_x emission limit should not exceed 50 mg/m³ for newly built coal-fired power plants [10,11]. To meet the more stringent regulations on NO_x emission, selective catalytic reduction (SCR) is widely applied due to its high efficiency, economics and mature technology [12,13].

In the coal-fired power plant, the SCR facility is usually installed between the boiler and the air preheater [13,14,15,16] and works with the dust-laden gas. The accumulation and the deposition of the ash particles, especially the large-sized particles, will increase the risk of catalyst deactivation [17,18]. Although soot blowers are used before the catalyst layers [13,19,20], the blockage and erosion of the monolith catalysts often occur. Figure 1a shows the breakage of the catalyst layer for a 660 MW coal-fired power plant. Moreover, the high-speed flue gas containing ash particles would lead to severe erosion on the ammonia injection grid (AIG) and the support structure, as shown in Figure 1b. It would shorten the lifetime of the catalysts and threaten the performance of the SCR-deNO_x facility. Hence, it is necessary to investigate the distribution of ash particles and take steps to disperse particle accumulation inside the SCR-deNO_x facility.

Recently, with the assistance of computational fluid dynamics (CFD), studies have been made upon particle behaviors inside the SCR-deNO_x facilities [21,22,23]. Xu et al. [24] numerically analyzed the catalyst breakage failure and presented the particle distributions at the entrance of the catalyst layers under different baffles configurations. Yu et al. [25] experimentally and numerically studied the catalyst erosion of the SCR-deNO_x reactor for a 660 MW coal-fired power plant. An integrated approach was proposed to predict the erosion condition and implement erosion optimization. Feng et al. [26] presented a detailed investigation of particle deposition in monolith SCR-deNO_x catalysts. The effects of particle diameter, particle density, gas velocity, turbulent intensity, chemical reaction and channel size were studied. Pilot-scale experiments on particle deposition of SCR-deNO_x catalysts were carried out by Heiredal et al. [27] and a model was developed, revealing the dominating mechanisms for particle deposition. Nevertheless, few research papers focus on the particle accumulation inside the duct and the corresponding solutions.

In the present study, CFD simulations are carried out for the SCR-deNO_x facility of a 1000 MW coal-fired power plant. Particle accumulation inside the duct is investigated with different particle sizes. A triangular deflector is proposed to disperse the particles with relatively large sizes and reduce accumulation. Optimal design is implemented on the structural parameters of the triangular deflector, including the angle against the wind and the height. Furthermore, the installing position of the triangular deflector in the vertical duct is assessed and optimized. The corresponding flow model test (FMT) is conducted with the optimized deflector as a validation of the dispersal effect and the optimal installing position. The installation of the triangular deflector is proven to be an efficient approach to reduce the particle accumulation, and can be applicable to high-dust SCR-deNO_x facilities.

2. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Simulations and Flow Model Test (FMT) Experiments

2.1. Description of the SCR-deNO_x Facility

The schematic geometry of the SCR-deNO_x facility for a 1000 MW coal-fired power plant is shown in Figure 2. This power plant is built by Guangdong Baolihua New Energy Stock Co., Ltd. and is located in Hudong Town, Lufeng City, Guangdong Province of China (22°49′56″ N, 115°59′10″ E). The baffles geometry is optimized to regulate the flow field and obtain a homogeneous distribution of gas velocity at the entrance of the catalysts.

The SCR-deNO_x facility shown in Figure 2 is the classic π type. The height of the facility is about 33,000 mm while the inlet size is about 10,000 mm × 19,000 mm. The sectional area of the catalyst layer is about 194 m². The flue gas leaving the economizer passes the dust hoppers and enters the sloped duct. Then, it goes through the AIG and hybrid grid in the vertical duct. After passing the wedge-shaped turning and the straightener, it finally enters the two catalyst layers. At the 100% boiler maximum continuous rating (BMCR) operational condition, the total flow rate of the flue gas is 979.60 kg/s with a temperature of 648 K. The mass flow rate of the ash particles is 12.54 kg/s. The characteristics of the ash particles including the diameter distribution are presented by the Instrumental Analysis Center of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, which is shown in

Table 1. The characteristics of the ash particles collected from the SCR-deNO_x facility.

Density	Particle Diameter Φ	Mass Fraction
1.0 g/cm3	>0.15 mm	10.97%
	8.8 × 10−2 mm < Φ ≤ 0.15 mm	8.07%
	6.3 × 10−2 mm < Φ ≤ 8.8 × 10−2 mm	2.92%
	≤6.3 × 10−2 mm	78.04%

.

2.2. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Simulations

CFD simulations are carried out by ANSYS Fluent 17.1 [28]. On the basis of grid convergence analysis, which is shown in Appendix A, the three-dimensional meshing model is established with the real scale. It ranges from −5132 mm to 32,008 mm in the X direction, from −11,000 mm to 22,489 mm in the Y direction and from −10,155 mm to 9465 mm in the Z direction. The total meshing number is about 3.85 million. Hex/Wedge and Tet/Hybrid grids are used to demonstrate the meshing geometry. For simplification, several assumptions are made for the calculation: (1) the model is considered to be adiabatic since the SCR-deNO_x facility is covered with an aluminum silicate blanket, which works as the thermal insulator, (2) no chemical reaction is introduced, (3) the gas flow is considered to be incompressible fluid, (4) the ash particles are treated as inert particles, and (5) the diameters for 99.50% of the ash particles are larger than 2.50 × 10⁻³ mm [25,26,29].

Accordingly, the Raynolds Averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) equations are used to handle the turbulence and the standard k-ε model is adopted. Meanwhile, the semi-implicit method for pressure-linked equation (SIMPLE) algorithm is chosen to solve the governing equations and second order upwind is used as the discretization scheme. The discrete phase model (DPM), which is under a Lagrange framework, is used to track the particle trajectories. The particles interact with the gas flow and the corresponding diameter distribution follows the Rosin-Rammler rule. According to the data in Table 1, the mean diameter and the spread parameter is calculated to be 3.5 × 10⁻² mm and 0.79, respectively. Boundary conditions are given as follows: the facility inlet is set to be velocity inlet with the flow rate of 4.50 m/s while the facility outlet is set to be pressure outlet. Moreover, the porous zone model is used to represent the catalyst layers with an inertial resistance coefficient of 30.85.

In the simulation cases, an observation plane named plane 1 is located 200 mm above the catalyst layer #1 to represent the velocity distribution and particle distribution at the entrance of the catalyst layers. Another observation plane named plane 2 is located at the entrance of turning 2, representing the particle distribution in the vertical duct.

To study the ash particle accumulation, CFD simulations are carried out with the arrangement shown in Figure 2. The particle distributions of plane 1 and plane 2 are presented subsequently. Based on the flow field, a triangular deflector is presented and installed in the vertical duct, aiming to disperse the accumulated particles and avoid severe impact on the velocity distribution. The sectional view of the triangular deflector is shown in Figure 3. Two sets of simulations are carried out to determine the optimal geometry of the triangular deflector. The first set is to investigate the optimal angle against the wind. The angle is set to be 10°, 15°, 30°, 45°, 60° respectively, with a fixed height of 300 mm. The second set aims to achieve the optimal height of the deflector. The height is set to be 100 mm, 200 mm, 300 mm, 500 mm, 700 mm respectively, while the angle is maintained at 15°. The simulation results are compared and analyzed based on the velocity distribution, total pressure loss and particle accumulation.

Attempts are also made to investigate the optimal installing position for the triangular deflector in the vertical duct. The deflector is installed at three different heights, as shown in Figure 4. The corresponding simulations are carried out with a low deflector installation, a middle deflector installation and a high deflector installation, respectively. Comparisons are made among the simulation results of these cases and data processing is conducted via MATLAB to evaluate the dispersal effect.

2.3. Flow Model Test (FMT) Experiments

The flow model test is performed as a validation, focusing on the dispersal effect of the optimized triangular deflector for the accumulated particles with relatively large sizes. The optimal installing position of the triangular deflector is verified. The schematic view of the FMT platform is shown in Figure 5.

The SCR-deNO_x facility with a scale of 1:12 is made from plexiglas while the baffles geometry is made of aluminum slices. Perforated plates are substituted for the catalyst layers to provide the pressure drop. Several small holes are processed in advance on the plexiglas as follows: six of them are used to set the triangular deflectors, as shown in Figure 6a. Meanwhile, the other nine of them are located above the perforated plates and are used for the measurement, which is shown in Figure 6b. As can be seen, they are sealed with plastic tapes if no measurement is conducted.

Since chemical reaction is not considered, air is substituted for the flue gas. The air velocity at the inlet is modified to be close to 4.50 m/s, which is in accordance with the 100% BMCR condition. To avoid environmental pollution, crushed millet is used to substitute for the ash particles with relatively large sizes and is sprinkled from the facility’s inlet. The diameter of the crushed millet ranges from 0.22 mm to 0.45 mm. A Testo-445 multi-function measuring instrument is used to measure the air velocity and the pressure loss with a vane probe and a pressure probe. The measuring range of the vane probe is 0.6 to 40 m/s and the corresponding accuracy is ±(0.2 m/s ± 1.5% of measurement value) (+0.6 to +40 m/s). The measuring range of the pressure probe is 0 to 10,000 Pa and the corresponding accuracy is ±10 Pa (0 to +2000 Pa) and ±0.5% of measurement value (+2000 to +10,000 Pa).

Meanwhile, a semicircular steel tube is used to collect the crushed millet. The tube is inserted into the nine small holes one by one, representing the distribution of the ash particles. The weights of millet for the nine collections are measured by a METTLER-TOLEDO analytical balance. Figure 7 illustrates the 72 detection spots over the perforated plate. They are arranged in an 8 × 9 matrix and the characters A–I refer to the nine small holes used for the measurement.

To avoid measurement error, variables are measured when the equipment runs to a relatively steady state. The experiments are repeated with deflector at different installing positions. Values of air velocity, pressure loss and weights of the crushed millet are recorded and analyzed. Comparisons are made between the results of the FMT experiments and CFD simulations.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Particle Distributions with No Deflector

Figure 8 illustrates the velocity distribution at plane 1. The corresponding relative standard deviation (RSD) is 9.93% and the total pressure loss is 513.90 Pa, including the two catalyst layers of 420 Pa. Figure 9 shows the velocity distribution of the central section for the SCR-deNO_x facility. As can be seen, the flue gas gathers towards the right-side wall of the vertical duct. The high-speed areas locate in the bottom side of the sloped duct and in the lower side of the vertical duct.

Figure 10a,b show the general ash particle distributions of plane 1 and plane 2 with no deflector installed. The corresponding histogram graphs of ash particle distributions along the X-direction and Z-direction are presented in Figure 11 and Figure 12, respectively.

As shown in Figure 11, there are 10 columns in both the X-direction and the Z-direction. It is indicated that the ash particle distribution is generally homogeneous in the Z-direction. Although the numbers of ash particles near the wall are relatively small, most of the percentages are close to the average level of 10%. However, an obviously inhomogeneous distribution of ash particle is observed along the X-direction. The deviation between the maximum and the minimum is about 20 percentage points. It is revealed that the ash particles are accumulated near the central area of the plane, especially in the fifth column. On the contrary, the amount of ash particles is quite small in the first and second columns, indicating that few ash particles are accumulated near the left-side wall, which is corresponding to the inner side of the wedge-shaped turning. Similarly, for the ash particles at plane 2, the distribution is relatively homogeneous along the Z-direction while it is quite inhomogeneous along the X-direction. According to Figure 12a, a severe accumulation of ash particles occurs near the right-side wall along the X-direction, which may lead to a drastic impact on the AIG and the support structure.

A further investigation is conducted on the distributions of ash particles with different diameters. According to Table 1, the ash particles are classified into four classes based on the diameters: the small-sized particles (Φ ≤ 6.3 × 10⁻² mm), the medium-sized particles (6.3 × 10⁻² mm < Φ ≤ 8.8 × 10⁻² mm), the large-sized particles (8.8 × 10⁻² mm < Φ ≤ 0.15 mm) and the extra-large-sized particles (Φ > 0.15 mm). Since the diameter distribution follows the Rosin-Rammler rule, the proportion of the particle numbers for the three groups is about 4:2:3:1. Figure 13 illustrates the distributions of the four classes of particles at plane 1 with no deflector installed.

According to Figure 13, it is indicated that the small-sized particles, which is shown in black dash, are well dispersed. Meanwhile, there is a similar tendency between the distributions of the large-sized and extra-large-sized particles, which are illustrated in blue and magenta, respectively. These two classes of ash particles perform extremely nonuniform distributions, especially for the extra-large-sized particles, the severest accumulation accounts for nearly 40% of the total amount. Moreover, few ash particles are accumulated near the left-side wall of plane 1. Generally speaking, for the classic π-type SCR-deNO_x facilities, the particle accumulation is considered to occur on one side of the catalysts’ entrance, which corresponds to the inner side of the wedge-shaped turning. This is in accordance with the former studies presented by Xu et al. [24] and Yu et al. [25]. With the diameter increases, a notable accumulation is observed and the distribution has a tendency to move towards the central area of the plane. Accordingly, it is revealed that the nonuniform particle distributions in Figure 11a and Figure 12a are mainly attributed to the accumulation of the large-sized and extra-large-sized particles, which are larger than 8.8 × 10⁻² mm. Attention should be paid to disperse the ash particles with relatively large sizes since they may be an important contributor to the particle accumulation. Furthermore, it is necessary to study the installation of the deflector, aiming to reduce the accumulation of the particles with relatively large sizes.

3.2. Optimization of the Triangular Deflector

Considering the particle accumulation in Figure 11 and Figure 12, the triangular deflector is installed on the right-side wall of the vertical duct. With a fixed installing position, the optimal design of the triangular deflector is carried out for the angle against the wind and the height. Lower RSD of velocity and total pressure loss are preferred while determining the optimal design.

Figure 14 shows the RSDs of velocity at plane 1 and the total pressure losses for deflectors with different angle against the wind. As shown in Figure 14, when the height is maintained to be 300 mm, no obvious impact is observed for the RSDs with different angle against the wind. However, when the angle increases, the total pressure loss increases as well. There is a deviation of 9.70 Pa between the pressure losses with the angles of 10° and 60°. Meanwhile, for the deflectors with the angles of 10° and 15°, the total pressure losses are close and the corresponding distributions of particles larger than 8.8 × 10⁻² mm are nearly the same, as shown in Figure 15. Considering the machining difficulty and the material consumption, the angle against the wind of 15° is adopted.

Figure 16 shows the RSDs of velocity at plane 1 and the total pressure losses for different heights of the deflector. It is indicated that with a fixed angle against the wind of 15°, the RSDs increase slightly for the deflectors of 500 mm and 700 mm, whereas the corresponding pressure losses increase noticeably. Figure 17 shows the distributions of particles larger than 8.8 × 10⁻² mm for the deflectors of 100 mm, 200 mm, 300 mm. The corresponding RSDs of the particles are 86.61%, 81.49%, 67.49%, respectively. It is revealed that the deflector with a height of 300 mm provides the best dispersal effect among the three deflectors.

Consequently, the angle against the wind of 15° and the height of 300 mm are adopted for the triangular deflector.

3.3. Particle Distributions with Different Installing Positions of the Deflector

Figure 18 illustrates the particle distributions at plane 1 with the low deflector installation, the middle deflector installation and the high deflector installation, respectively. To make comparisons, Figure 13, which presents the particle distribution with no deflector installed, is illustrated here as Figure 18a.

Table 2. The RSDs of distributions for small-sized, medium-sized, large-sized and extra-large-sized particles at plane 1 with different installing positions of the triangular deflector.

Case	Small-Sized Particles	Medium-Sized Particles	Large-Sized Particles	Extra-Large-Sized Particles
No deflector installed	16.97%	40.94%	75.25%	117.29%
Low deflector installation	17.39%	43.60%	61.73%	66.12%
Middle deflector installation	17.05%	48.59%	68.96%	67.38%
High deflector installation	13.73%	44.76%	76.67%	78.98%

and

Table 3. The maximum percentages of small-sized, medium-sized, large-sized and extra-large-sized particles at plane 1 with different installing positions of the triangular deflector.

Case	Small-Sized Particles	Medium-Sized Particles	Large-Sized Particles	Extra-Large-Sized Particles
No deflector installed	12.21%	17.58%	26.73%	39.84%
Low deflector installation	12.72%	18.45%	21.70%	20.59%
Middle deflector installation	13.12%	19.69%	25.28%	23.31%
High deflector installation	12.72%	18.18%	28.02%	25.24%

give the statistical indices of the particle distributions corresponding to Figure 18. The RSD is used to represent the uniformity of ash particle distributions.

Generally, it is indicated that the installation of the triangular deflector cannot substantially improve the distributions of small-sized and medium-sized particles, while it plays a positive role in reducing the accumulation of the large-sized and extra-large-sized particles. Although the performance varies from each other among Figure 18b–d, the accumulated large-sized and extra-large-sized particles are dispersed and the corresponding maximum percentage decreases. The installation of the triangular deflector may not only disperse particles itself but also reduce the momentum of the particles. When passing the turnings in the downstream side, the particles larger than 8.8 × 10⁻² mm possess fewer inertia and are unable to accumulate easily in the area near the central line of plane 1.

As shown in Table 2 and Table 3, the low deflector installation gives the best performance on reducing the accumulation of large-sized and extra-large-sized particles. Compared with Figure 18a, which shows the particle distribution without the deflector, the maximum percentages of the accumulated large-sized and extra-large-sized particles decrease from 26.73% to 21.70% and from 39.84% to 20.59%, respectively, which is better than the middle and high deflector installations. Besides, the RSDs of the large-sized and extra-large-sized particles with the low deflector installation are 61.73% and 66.12%, which is the smallest among the four cases.

Likewise, investigations are also conducted on the particle distributions at plane 2. Figure 19 shows the corresponding distributions with different installing configurations of the deflector. It is indicated that the installation of the deflector has a notable performance on reducing the particle accumulation near the right-side wall. However, the ash particles cannot be dispersed effectively to the left side of plane 2. This is mainly due to the limitation of the height of the triangular deflector. Enlarging the deflector will lead to the increase of the total pressure loss.

Table 4. The RSDs of distributions for small-sized, medium-sized, large-sized and extra-large-sized particles at plane 2 with different installing positions of the triangular deflector.

Case	Small-Sized Particles	Medium-Sized Particles	Large-Sized Particles	Extra-Large-Sized Particles
No deflector installed	29.04%	66.36%	122.05%	162.57%
Low deflector installation	20.08%	48.87%	83.92%	109.99%
Middle deflector installation	21.08%	52.24%	90.58%	117.44%
High deflector installation	16.30%	40.84%	72.65%	97.06%

and

Table 5. The maximum percentages of small-sized, medium-sized, large-sized and extra-large-sized particles at plane 2 with different installing positions of the triangular deflector.

Case	Small-Sized Particles	Medium-Sized Particles	Large-Sized Particles	Extra-Large-Sized Particles
No deflector installed	16.65%	27.41%	43.55%	55.28%
Low deflector installation	13.82%	21.61%	30.53%	36.78%
Middle deflector installation	14.46%	22.98%	33.01%	39.46%
High deflector installation	12.45%	18.53%	23.53%	27.38%

show the statistical indices of the particle distributions corresponding to Figure 19. The high deflector installation seems to reduce the accumulation remarkably. This is because the deflector is installed near the observation plane, which improves the dispersal effect. Meanwhile, the high deflector installation cannot achieve a satisfying performance on reducing the accumulation of plane 1, as can be seen from Table 2 and Table 3. Hence, the low deflector installation may be an optimal choice.

Furthermore, combined with the central sectional contour shown in Figure 9, it is indicated that the low deflector installation is located in the high-speed area of the flow field in the vertical duct. Therefore, installing the triangular deflectors in the high-speed area of the vertical duct may be an efficient way to disperse particles with relatively large sizes and reduce particle accumulation at the entrance of the catalysts.

Figure 20 illustrates the velocity distribution of plane 1 corresponding to the low deflector installation. The RSD of velocity is 8.30% and the total pressure loss is 518.91 Pa, including the two catalyst layers of 420 Pa. Compared with Figure 8, it reveals that the low deflector installation has no drastic impact on the velocity distribution and the total pressure loss.

3.4. FMT Validation

Table 6. Measured weights of the crushed millet in the FMT (unit: g).

Case	Position of the Detection Holes
	A	B	C	D	E	F	G	H	I
No deflector installed	8.1939	6.2764	3.6915	16.0562	33.2517	16.5015	7.5442	7.3632	14.7715
Low deflector installation	6.3363	6.7788	3.1165	11.9148	10.3647	4.2281	9.2913	6.9905	8.6209
Middle deflector installation	5.1246	4.3803	2.3775	15.3987	11.1882	9.4037	7.1723	3.6794	9.6139
High deflector installation	8.2276	5.7866	5.0182	28.6073	2.4682	14.2543	13.4807	7.9573	15.9467

displays the measured weights of the crushed millet in the FMT. Figure 21 illustrates the particle distribution over the perforated plate and

Table 7. The RSDs and the maximum percentages of the crushed millet’s weight over the perforated plate with different installing positions of the triangular deflector.

Case	RSD	Maximum Percentage
No deflector installed	68.12%	28.51%
Low deflector installation	36.36%	16.87%
Middle deflector installation	50.94%	21.00%
High deflector installation	69.10%	27.84%

gives the corresponding statistical indices.

According to Figure 21a, when no additional deflector exists, it indicates that the crushed millet accumulates in the central area of the plane. The corresponding maximum percentage of the accumulation is 28.51%. Nonetheless, after installing the triangular deflector, it is easy to find that all the distributions have moved towards the left side of the plane. Although no evident improvement of uniformity is achieved by the high deflector installation, the accumulation is dispersed noticeably for the low deflector installation. The maximum percentage of the accumulated millet with the low deflector installation is 16.87% and the RSD is 36.36%, demonstrating that the low deflector installation is effective in reducing the accumulation during the FMT.

Compared with the blue lines and magenta lines in Figure 18, the experimental results show a similar tendency on the distributions of the large-sized and extra-large-sized particles, which are classified as the particles larger than 8.8 × 10⁻² mm. In other words, the effects of different deflector installations on dispersing the particles are in accordance with the simulation results of the particles larger than 8.8 × 10⁻² mm. It can be observed that the maximum spots occurred at different positions on the coordinate to some extent. Generally speaking, the experimental results have a deviation towards the right side and a slight accumulation near the left-side wall. This may be attributed to the sampling process and the usage of the crushed millet. Measurement errors are caused by the collection through the detection holes. Besides, the crushed millet ranging from 0.22 mm to 0.45 mm contains more inertia, leading to the deviation to the right side. Some millet may be too heavy for the air to lift. Thus, accumulation occurs near the left-side wall after the crushed millet passes the turnings.

Table 8. Measured values of air velocity for the FMT with the low deflector installation (unit: m/s).

Detection Spot	A	B	C	D	E	F	G	H	I
1	2.22	2.75	2.29	1.95	2.31	2.09	2.08	2.15	2.15
2	2.60	2.74	2.30	1.99	2.15	2.13	2.10	2.67	2.31
3	2.34	2.92	2.26	2.10	2.22	2.23	2.06	2.26	2.18
4	2.23	2.62	2.31	2.15	2.43	2.32	2.12	2.26	2.37
5	2.55	2.65	2.19	2.14	2.37	2.38	2.15	2.24	2.36
6	2.52	2.81	2.15	2.27	2.56	2.50	2.23	2.60	2.30
7	2.79	2.68	2.11	2.16	2.49	2.42	2.29	2.34	2.34
8	2.44	2.48	2.03	2.14	2.48	2.21	2.21	2.54	2.25

shows the measured values of air velocity for the FMT with the low deflector installation. According to Table 8, the RSD is 9.20% and the corresponding pressure loss is 489 Pa. The statistical indices of the FMT are in good agreement with the simulation results of the low deflector installation, which is shown in Figure 20.

Qualitatively speaking, the FMT results are consistent with the simulation results of the large-sized and extra-large-sized particles. The corresponding distributions of the accumulated particles are similar. Meanwhile, it provides an indication that the optimized triangular deflector is an effective approach in reducing the accumulation of the ash particles with relatively large sizes. According to the experimental results, the low installation of the triangular deflector shows the best performance. It proves that the optimal installing position is in accordance with the simulation results, which is in the high-speed area of the vertical duct. Besides, it is revealed that the installation of the optimized deflector won’t bring any drastic impact on the flow field of the SCR-deNO_x facility. On the other hand, there are still drawbacks for the implementation of the FMT. In this study, since the diameter range of the crushed millet is larger than 8.8 × 10⁻²−0.15 mm, it is unable to represent the ash particles perfectly and can only provide qualitative analysis. Moreover, the distributions of the particles smaller than 8.8 × 10⁻² mm and the comparisons among the four classes of particles cannot be validated via the FMT experiments. Further study is needed and a more precise evaluation on the accumulated particles may be presented.

4. Conclusions

In this study, the particle dispersal approach for the SCR-deNO_x facility of a 1000 MW coal-fired power plant was investigated. Evaluation was made on the accumulation of different-sized particles via CFD simulation. It was revealed that for the classic π-type SCR-deNO_x facilities, the particle accumulation predominantly occurred on one side of the catalysts’ entrance, which corresponds to the inner side of the wedge-shaped turning, and the ash particles larger than 8.8 × 10⁻² mm were mainly responsible for the accumulation. A triangular deflector was optimized numerically and used to reduce the particle accumulation. According to the simulation results, installing the triangular deflector at the high-speed area of the vertical duct may be an efficient way to disperse the particles with relatively large sizes and reduce the accumulation. Statistical indices showed that after installing the deflector, the RSDs of the large-sized and extra-large-sized particles decreased from 75.25% to 61.73% and from 117.29% to 66.12%, respectively. The corresponding maximum percentages of the accumulation decreased from 26.73% to 21.70% and from 39.84% to 20.59%, respectively. FMT was carried out to validate the simulation results. The dispersal effect and the optimal installing position of the triangular deflector on particles with relatively large sizes were validated. This paper provides comprehensive investigations on particle accumulation and is a supplementary work for the former studies. The numerical and experimental results presented in this study may provide a good reference on reducing the particle accumulation and are valuable for further study. The proposed optimized triangular deflector along with its installing position were proven to be effective and can be easily implemented on high-dust SCR-deNO_x facilities.