Next Article in Journal
Plasma-Derived Reactive Species Shape a Differentiation Profile in Human Monocytes
Next Article in Special Issue
Fiber Bragg Grating (FBG) Sensors in a High-Scattering Optical Fiber Doped with MgO Nanoparticles for Polarization-Dependent Temperature Sensing
Previous Article in Journal
A Probabilistic Hyperspectral Imagery Restoration Method
Previous Article in Special Issue
Optimization of Optical Networks Based on CDC-ROADM Technology
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Graphene-Based Cylindrical Pillar Gratings for Polarization-Insensitive Optical Absorbers

by
Muhammad Fayyaz Kashif
1,*,
Giuseppe Valerio Bianco
2,
Tiziana Stomeo
3,
Maria Antonietta Vincenti
4,
Domenico de Ceglia
5,
Massimo De Vittorio
3,6,
Michael Scalora
7,
Giovanni Bruno
2,
Antonella D’Orazio
1 and
Marco Grande
1,2
1
Dipartimento di Ingegneria Elettrica e dell’Informazione, Politecnico di Bari, Via Orabona 4, 70125 Bari, Italy
2
Istituto di Nanotecnologia—CNR-NANOTEC, Via Orabona 4, 70125 Bari, Italy
3
Center for Bio-Molecular Nanotechnology, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia (IIT), Via Barsanti, 73010 Arnesano, Lecce, Italy
4
Department of Information Engineering, University of Brescia, Via Branze 38, 25121 Brescia, Italy
5
Department of Information Engineering, University of Padova, Via Gradenigo 6/b, 35131 Padova, Italy
6
Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell’Innovazione, Università del Salento, Via Arnesano, 73100 Lecce, Italy
7
Charles M. Bowden Research Center, RDECOM, Redstone Arsenal, Huntsville, AL 35898-5000, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2019, 9(12), 2528; https://doi.org/10.3390/app9122528
Submission received: 23 May 2019 / Revised: 13 June 2019 / Accepted: 18 June 2019 / Published: 21 June 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances on Dielectric Photonic Devices and Systems beyond Visible)

Abstract

:
In this study, we present a two-dimensional dielectric grating which allows achieving high absorption in a monolayer graphene at visible and near-infrared frequencies. Dielectric gratings create guided-mode resonances that are exploited to effectively couple light with the graphene layer. The proposed structure was numerically analyzed through a rigorous coupled-wave analysis method. Effects of geometrical parameters and response to the oblique incidence of the plane wave were studied. Numerical results reveal that light absorption in the proposed structure is almost insensitive to the angle of the impinging source over a considerable wide angular range of 20°. This may lead to the development of easy to fabricate and experimentally viable graphene-based absorbers in the future.

1. Introduction

Graphene has emerged as an attractive two-dimensional material due to its exceptional mechanical, electrical, and optical properties [1]. Monolayer graphene exhibits better absorbance than different dielectric and metals of the same thickness. A considerable amount of theoretical and experimental work has been published in recent years to explore the potential of graphene in optical and microwave absorbers in different spectral ranges of the electromagnetic spectrum for various applications such as biosensors, optical filters, modulators, and efficient photodetector [2,3,4].
Monolayer graphene shows a constant absorption of about 2.3% over the visible and near-infrared wavelengths [5]. However, in the context of optical absorbers, this value is not enough which substantially limits its use in photonic devices. Therefore, enhancement of light absorption by monolayer graphene has drawn significant attention from researchers and several solutions have been proposed in the technical literature to achieve the perfect absorption. One- and two-dimensional dielectric gratings exploit guided-mode resonance (GMR) to increase light-matter interaction. Light is effectively coupled to graphene if incorporated with such gratings [6]. By varying geometrical parameters of the grating structure, the resonant wavelength and the bandwidth of absorption are tuned. A number of numerical studies [7,8,9,10] report perfect absorption of light in graphene incorporated dielectric gratings over diverse spectral ranges. Recently, near total absorption in monolayer graphene based on critical coupling was presented at a visible wavelength of 605 nm [11]. In some other recent studies, multilevel structures were investigated and enhanced graphene absorption was reported [12,13,14]. The main drawback of the multilevel structures is the complexity of the fabrication process since it requires the deposition of multiple material layers. Experimental and measured results for several fabricated graphene-based structures have also been presented [15,16,17,18]. The maximum experimentally measured values of absorption reported are 35% at 0.73 µm [15], 40% at 0.7 µm [16], 45% at 10 µm [17], and 99% at 1.48 µm [18]. Apart from grating-based structures, perfect absorbers based on metamaterials have also been reported [19,20,21,22].
However, perfect, broadband, tunable and polarization-independent absorption of light in monolayer graphene for photonic applications is still a challenging problem and needs further research and exploration. In this framework, it is worth pointing out that the absorption spectra of resonant gratings are highly sensitive to the angle of incident light.
In previous work, we demonstrated that graphene-based gratings are exploited to modulate the Fano-like signature of GMRs [23]. Moreover, two-dimensional arrays of rectangular gold nanopatches grown on monolayer graphene were used to experimentally demonstrate the polarization dependence of plasmonic gratings at normal incidence [24].
In this study, we numerically investigate a two-dimensional (2D) dielectric grating through the rigorous coupled-wave analysis (RCWA) method. We demonstrate the effects of geometrical parameters of the 2D grating on its spectral characteristics of interest. We further study the response of the proposed device for the oblique incidence of a plane wave source. We show that it has a stable optical absorption of around 40% over a considerable wide angular range of 20°. Electromagnetic field distributions at resonant frequencies are presented to explain the underlying physical phenomenon for optical absorption.

2. Materials and Methods

Figure 1a shows the sketch of the proposed 2D dielectric grating. It consisted of a periodic array of polymethyl-methacrylate (PMMA) cylindrical pillars deposited on a tantalum pentoxide (Ta2O5) waveguide. A slab of silicon dioxide (SiO2) was used as a substrate. The monolayer graphene was placed on top of the waveguide under the PMMA pillars. The proposed 2D dielectric grating can be realized using nanoimprint lithography (NIL). This technology enables the faster fabrication of polymeric-based dielectric gratings at a low cost. The choice of the proposed 2D configuration was based on the possibility of an insensitive polarization behavior at normal incidence for the GMRs that are excited in the Ta2O5 dielectric waveguide. A 20 nm thick buffer layer of PMMA was added on top of the graphene layer (and under the cylinder) to take into account the fabrication tolerances introduced by the NIL fabrication step.
The thickness of the monolayer graphene was equal to 0.34 nm. A thin buffer layer of PMMA (20 nm thick) was also placed over the monolayer graphene considering the quality of graphene was not affected by pillar fabrication. The geometrical parameters of the device are detailed in Figure 1b. The thickness tTa2O5 of the Ta2O5 slab and the PMMA pillar height tPMMA were initially set equal to 150 nm and 600 nm, respectively. The PMMA pillars have symmetric periodicity both in x- and y- directions and the value chosen was equal to 600 nm at the start. The radius r of the cylindrical PMMA pillars was chosen as 250 nm.
The 2D graphene-based dielectric gratings were simulated by means of RSoft-DiffactMOD that implements a Fourier-space method, the rigorous coupled-wave analysis (RCWA), to solve scattering from periodic structures. The refractive indices for PMMA, Ta2O5, and SiO2 were retrieved from Palik et al. [25]. For monolayer graphene, we used the complex refractive index n = 3 + jC1 * λ/3 reported in [26] at visible frequencies where C1 was equal to 5.446 µm−1 and λ was the free space wavelength to take into account the losses.

3. Results

Figure 2 shows the reflection, transmission, and absorption spectra of the device with and without graphene layer for the TE and TM polarizations at normal incidence. The absorption spectrum shows resonant peaks at the 0.7 µm, 0.9 µm, and 0.96 µm wavelengths. These correspond to absorption of 20%, 50%, and 40%, respectively. The absorption is zero when the structure has no graphene layer. It is noted that the optical response is insensitive to the polarization of the incoming light wave due to the symmetry of the device (2D square lattice).
The electromagnetic field distributions are shown in Figure 3a,b at the resonant wavelength of 0.9 µm (maximum absorption) for the TE and TM polarizations, respectively. It clearly illustrates that the fields are concentrated around monolayer graphene. The white lines represent the device structure where the monolayer graphene is positioned at z = 0.15 µm (that corresponds to the thickness of the Ta2O5). The comparison between Figure 3 (with graphene) and Figure 4 (without graphene) shows the difference between the values of field magnitudes of about a factor two.
Next, we studied the effects of device geometrical parameters. Figure 5 describes the absorption (A) spectra at different grating periods (p) while Ta2O5 layer thickness tTa2O5 and PMMA pillar height tPMMA are kept constant. It is evident that absorption peak wavelength is tuned over the visible and near-infrared wavelengths by changing the grating period. The sliding of the resonant wavelengths with increasing device period agrees well with the analysis presented in [6]. Each absorption spectrum shows multiple peaks which result from multiple guided-mode resonances. In addition, there is an increase in absorption with increasing period length as is observed in Figure 5a–d. Since our device is polarization independent for normally incident plane waves, we have shown the absorption spectra for TE polarized plane waves only.
The effects of variations of Ta2O5 layer thickness tTa2O5 and PMMA pillar height tPMMA on the absorption spectrum have also been investigated. Figure 6a depicts the effect of change of tTa2O5 on the absorption spectrum. There is a red shift in the resonant wavelength as the thickness of the Ta2O5 waveguide is increased from 80 nm to 160 nm. Multiple resonances appear among which the prominent ones are shown in the absorption map.
Figure 6b depicts the effect of change of tPMMA on the absorption spectrum revealing no changes when the PMMA thickness is varied in the range of 300 nm to 900 nm.
We further analyze the optical response of the proposed device under the oblique incidence of the plane wave source. Figure 7 shows the absorption maps when the incidence angle is changed from 0° to 90° for both TE and TM polarizations. The maps show that the resonance at normal incidence splits into two arms for angular incidence. This behavior is typical of a grating structure that is derived by the absorption spectra. It is interesting to note that the absorption spectra do not split into two arms for certain resonant wavelengths and absorption is nearly independent of the source angle for specific angular ranges.
To further elaborate these important results, the absorption spectra of the device for both TE and TM polarizations are shown in Figure 8 in an angular range of 0–20° for two different device periods. The absorption is limited within narrow bandwidths of ~15 nm and ~20 nm for the maps in (a,b) and (c,d) respectively over a considerable wide angular range of 20°. The slope is about 0.5 nm/degree in the 0–10° range.
Another important result is depicted in Figure 9 which shows absorption spectra in an angular range of 70–90°. It is noted that the absorption is limited in narrow bandwidths of ~25 nm and ~10 nm for the angular ranges of 70–90° and 75–90°, respectively in both (a) and (b) maps. Furthermore, the device behavior is similar under both TE and TM polarizations.
In short, the observations in Figure 8; Figure 9 prove the near insensitivity of the proposed device to the angle and polarization of the incident light in multiple angular ranges of around 20°. Angular response of our device shows clear improvement as compared with results reported in [15] for a graphene-based absorber based on a one-dimensional grating where absorption spectra split into two arms from 0–20° under similar simulation conditions.

4. Discussion

In our previous work [15,16], we experimentally demonstrated light absorption in graphene-based one-dimensional dielectric gratings based on PMMA rectangular strips. However, the response of the structures is sensitive to the oblique incidence of light. In this study, we propose a device based on a 2D grating of cylindrical PMMA pillars that exploit GMRs to enhance light absorption in the monolayer graphene. Our proposed structure achieved light absorption of more than 40% at multiple wavelengths for both TE and TM polarizations over narrow bandwidths in the visible and near-infrared ranges. The device performance is insensitive to variation in the PMMA pillar height which is an important measure in terms of device stability and fabrication tolerances.
Our simulations further revealed that the device has a considerable stable angular response. The absorption spectra are nearly independent of the angle of the impinging light up to 20° with a slope of ~0.5 nm/degree. Moreover, the response is less sensitive to the polarization of the incident plane waves.
In conclusion, the proposed optical absorber is less sensitive to geometrical parameters variations, polarization, and angle of the incident light which can be easily realized using nanofabrication technologies such as nanoimprint lithography.
These results pave the way to the realization of polarization-insensitive optical absorbers that can be efficiently exploited in several applications and photonic devices such as biosensors, optical filters, modulators, and efficient photodetectors.

Author Contributions

M.F.K. prepared the original draft. G.V.B., T.S., M.A.V., D.d.C., M.D.V., M.S., G.B., A.D., and M.G. contributed to the review and editing of the paper. M.G. supervised the research activity.

Funding

Research was sponsored by the RDECOM, RFEC-Atlantic, and the US Army Aviation and Missile Research, Development and Engineering Center and was accomplished under Grant Numbers W911NF-16-2-0236. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the AMRDEC or the U.S. Government.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

  1. Novoselov, K.S.; Geim, A.K.; Morozov, S.V.; Jiang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Dubonos, S.V.; Grigorieva, I.V.; Firsov, A.A. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 2004, 306, 666–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Szunerits, S.; Boukherroub, R. Graphene-based biosensors. Interface Focus 2018, 8, 20160132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Freitag, M.; Low, T.; Zhu, W.; Yan, H.; Xia, F.; Avouris, P. Photocurrent in graphene harnessed by tunable intrinsic plasmons. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1951–1958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zhenhua, S.; Haixin, C. Graphene and graphene-like two-dimensional materials in photodetection: Mechanisms and methodology. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 4133–4156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Butler, S.Z.; Hollen, S.M.; Cao, L.; Cui, Y.; Gupta, J.A.; Gutiérrez, H.R.; Heinz, T.F.; Hong, S.S.; Huang, J.; Ismach, A.F.; et al. Progress, challenges, and opportunities in two-dimensional materials beyond graphene. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 2898–2926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gao, W.; Shu, J.; Qiu, C.; Xu, Q. Excitation of plasmonic waves in graphene by guided-mode resonances. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 7806–7813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fan, Y.; Guo, C.; Zhu, Z.; Xu, W.; Wu, F.; Yuan, X.; Qin, S. Monolayer-graphene-based broadband and wide-angle perfect absorption structures in the near infrared. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 13709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, S.; Wang, Y.; Wang, S.; Zheng, W. Wavelength-tunable perfect absorber based on guided-mode resonances. Appl. Opt. 2016, 55, 3176–3181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhao, B.; Zhao, J.M.; Zhang, Z.M. Resonance enhanced absorption in a graphene monolayer using deep metal gratings. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2015, 32, 1176–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Vincenti, M.A.; de Ceglia, D.; Grande, M.; D’Orazio, A.; Scalora, M. Nonlinear control of absorption in one-dimensional photonic crystal with graphene-based defect. Opt. Lett. 2013, 38, 3550–3553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mahigir, A.; Veronis, G. Nanostructure for near total light absorption in a monolayer of graphene in the visible. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2018, 35, 3153–3158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wu, J. Ultra-narrow perfect graphene absorber based on critical coupling. Opt. Commun. 2019, 435, 25–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yang, L.; Wang, J.; Lu, C. Sensitive perfect absorber with monolayer graphene-based multi-layer dielectric grating structure. Optik (Stuttg.) 2018, 158, 508–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hu, J.; Qing, Y.; Yang, S.; Ren, Y.; Wu, X.; Gao, W.; Wu, C. Tailoring total absorption in a graphene monolayer covered subwavelength multilayer dielectric grating structure at near-infrared frequencies. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2017, 34, 861–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Grande, M.; Vincenti, M.A.; Stomeo, T.; Bianco, G.V.; De Ceglia, D.; Aközbek, N.; Petruzzelli, V.; Bruno, G.; De Vittorio, M.; Scalora, M.; et al. Graphene-based perfect optical absorbers harnessing guided mode resonances. Opt. Express 2015, 23, 21032–21042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Grande, M.; Vincenti, M.A.; Stomeo, T.; Bianco, G.V.; De Ceglia, D.; Aközbek, N.; Petruzzelli, V.; Bruno, G.; De Vittorio, M.; Scalora, M.; et al. Graphene-based absorber exploiting guided mode resonances in one-dimensional gratings. Opt. Express 2014, 22, 31511–31519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Safaei, A.; Chandra, S.; Vázquez-Guardado, A.; Calderon, J.; Franklin, D.; Tetard, L.; Zhai, L.; Leuenberger, M.N.; Chanda, D. Dynamically tunable extraordinary light absorption in monolayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 2017, 96, 165431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Guo, C.C.; Zhu, Z.H.; Yuan, X.D.; Ye, W.M.; Liu, K.; Zhang, J.F.; Xu, W.; Qin, S.Q. Experimental demonstration of total absorption over 99% in the near infrared for monolayer-graphene-based subwavelength structures. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2016, 4, 1955–1960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lin, H.; Sturmberg, B.C.; Lin, K.T.; Yang, Y.; Zheng, X.; Chong, T.K.; de Sterke, C.M.; Jia, B. A 90-nm-thick graphene metamaterial for strong and extremely broadband absorption of unpolarized light. Nat. Photonics 2019, 13, 270–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Landy, N.I.; Sajuyigbe, S.; Mock, J.J.; Smith, D.R.; Padilla, W.J. Perfect metamaterial absorber. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 100, 207402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Xiang, Y.; Dai, X.; Guo, J.; Zhang, H.; Wen, S.; Tang, D. Critical coupling with graphene-based hyperbolic metamaterials. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 5483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Sreekanth, K.V.; ElKabbash, M.; Alapan, Y.; Rashed, A.R.; Gurkan, U.A.; Strangi, G. A multiband perfect absorber based on hyperbolic metamaterials. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 26272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. de Ceglia, D.; Vincenti, M.A.; Grande, M.; Bianco, G.V.; Bruno, G.; D’Orazio, A.; Scalora, M. Tuning infrared guided-mode resonances with graphene. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2016, 33, 426–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Grande, M.; Stomeo, T.; Bianco, G.V.; Vincenti, M.A.; De Ceglia, D.; Petruzzelli, V.; Bruno, G.; De Vittorio, M.; Scalora, M.; D’Orazio, A. Fabrication of doubly resonant plasmonic nanopatch arrays on graphene. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 102, 231111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Palik, E.D.; Ghosh, G. Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids, 3rd ed.; Academic Press: San Deigo, CA, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  26. Bruna, M.; Borini, S. Optical constants of graphene layers in the visible range. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 94, 031901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Sketch of a 2D graphene-based dielectric grating with an array of cylindrical pillars and (b) the cross-sectional (x,z) view of the single period of the device used for simulations.
Figure 1. (a) Sketch of a 2D graphene-based dielectric grating with an array of cylindrical pillars and (b) the cross-sectional (x,z) view of the single period of the device used for simulations.
Applsci 09 02528 g001
Figure 2. Optical reflectance (dashed blue line), the transmittance (dotted black line), and absorption (solid red line) spectra (a,b) without and (c,d) with graphene layer for both (a,c) TE and (b,d) TM plane waves at normal incidence. The device period p, waveguide Ta2O5 thickness tTa2O5, and PMMA pillars height tPMMA for this simulation result are set as 600 nm, 150 nm, and 600 nm, respectively.
Figure 2. Optical reflectance (dashed blue line), the transmittance (dotted black line), and absorption (solid red line) spectra (a,b) without and (c,d) with graphene layer for both (a,c) TE and (b,d) TM plane waves at normal incidence. The device period p, waveguide Ta2O5 thickness tTa2O5, and PMMA pillars height tPMMA for this simulation result are set as 600 nm, 150 nm, and 600 nm, respectively.
Applsci 09 02528 g002
Figure 3. Field profiles (a) amplitude of Ey component and (b) amplitude of Ex component at 0.9 µm for the device parameters of Figure 2. The white lines show the device structure where the monolayer graphene is positioned at z = 0.15 µm (marked by the black line).
Figure 3. Field profiles (a) amplitude of Ey component and (b) amplitude of Ex component at 0.9 µm for the device parameters of Figure 2. The white lines show the device structure where the monolayer graphene is positioned at z = 0.15 µm (marked by the black line).
Applsci 09 02528 g003
Figure 4. Field profiles (a) amplitude of Ey component and (b) amplitude of Ex component at 0.9 µm without the graphene layer. The white lines show the device structure.
Figure 4. Field profiles (a) amplitude of Ey component and (b) amplitude of Ex component at 0.9 µm without the graphene layer. The white lines show the device structure.
Applsci 09 02528 g004
Figure 5. Absorption spectra of the proposed structure under varying grating period for normally incident TE polarized plane wave. The waveguide Ta2O5 thickness tTa2O5, and polymethyl-methacrylate (PMMA) pillars height tPMMA are fixed at 150 nm and 600 nm, respectively.
Figure 5. Absorption spectra of the proposed structure under varying grating period for normally incident TE polarized plane wave. The waveguide Ta2O5 thickness tTa2O5, and polymethyl-methacrylate (PMMA) pillars height tPMMA are fixed at 150 nm and 600 nm, respectively.
Applsci 09 02528 g005
Figure 6. (a) Absorption map with respect to the variation of Ta2O5 layer thickness tTa2O5 under TE at normal illumination when the period, p, and PMMA pillar height, tPMMA, are fixed at 600 nm and 600 nm, respectively. (b) Absorption map under TE normal illumination, when PMMA pillar thickness tPMMA is varied from 300 nm to 900 nm. The period, p, and waveguide, Ta2O5, thickness tTa2O5 are fixed at 600 nm and 150 nm, respectively.
Figure 6. (a) Absorption map with respect to the variation of Ta2O5 layer thickness tTa2O5 under TE at normal illumination when the period, p, and PMMA pillar height, tPMMA, are fixed at 600 nm and 600 nm, respectively. (b) Absorption map under TE normal illumination, when PMMA pillar thickness tPMMA is varied from 300 nm to 900 nm. The period, p, and waveguide, Ta2O5, thickness tTa2O5 are fixed at 600 nm and 150 nm, respectively.
Applsci 09 02528 g006
Figure 7. Absorption maps of the device for varying incidence angle (0–90°) under both TE and TM polarizations. For (a,b) device period p, the waveguide Ta2O5 thickness tTa2O5, and PMMA pillars height tPMMA are fixed at 450 nm, 150 nm, and 600 nm, respectively, whereas, for (c,d) the period p is changed to 600 nm.
Figure 7. Absorption maps of the device for varying incidence angle (0–90°) under both TE and TM polarizations. For (a,b) device period p, the waveguide Ta2O5 thickness tTa2O5, and PMMA pillars height tPMMA are fixed at 450 nm, 150 nm, and 600 nm, respectively, whereas, for (c,d) the period p is changed to 600 nm.
Applsci 09 02528 g007
Figure 8. Peak absorption wavelength when the incident angle is varied in range 0–20°. (a,b) The device period p, the waveguide Ta2O5 thickness tTa2O5, and PMMA pillars height tPMMA are fixed at 450 nm, 150 nm, and 600 nm, respectively. (c,d) The device period p, the waveguide Ta2O5 thickness tTa2O5, and PMMA pillars height tPMMA are fixed at 600 nm, 150 nm, and 600 nm, respectively.
Figure 8. Peak absorption wavelength when the incident angle is varied in range 0–20°. (a,b) The device period p, the waveguide Ta2O5 thickness tTa2O5, and PMMA pillars height tPMMA are fixed at 450 nm, 150 nm, and 600 nm, respectively. (c,d) The device period p, the waveguide Ta2O5 thickness tTa2O5, and PMMA pillars height tPMMA are fixed at 600 nm, 150 nm, and 600 nm, respectively.
Applsci 09 02528 g008
Figure 9. Peak absorption wavelength of the device for varying incidence angle (70–90°) under both TE and TM polarizations. The device period p, the waveguide Ta2O5 thickness tTa2O5, and PMMA pillars height tPMMA are fixed at 600 nm, 150 nm, and 600 nm, respectively.
Figure 9. Peak absorption wavelength of the device for varying incidence angle (70–90°) under both TE and TM polarizations. The device period p, the waveguide Ta2O5 thickness tTa2O5, and PMMA pillars height tPMMA are fixed at 600 nm, 150 nm, and 600 nm, respectively.
Applsci 09 02528 g009

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kashif, M.F.; Bianco, G.V.; Stomeo, T.; Vincenti, M.A.; de Ceglia, D.; De Vittorio, M.; Scalora, M.; Bruno, G.; D’Orazio, A.; Grande, M. Graphene-Based Cylindrical Pillar Gratings for Polarization-Insensitive Optical Absorbers. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 2528. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9122528

AMA Style

Kashif MF, Bianco GV, Stomeo T, Vincenti MA, de Ceglia D, De Vittorio M, Scalora M, Bruno G, D’Orazio A, Grande M. Graphene-Based Cylindrical Pillar Gratings for Polarization-Insensitive Optical Absorbers. Applied Sciences. 2019; 9(12):2528. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9122528

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kashif, Muhammad Fayyaz, Giuseppe Valerio Bianco, Tiziana Stomeo, Maria Antonietta Vincenti, Domenico de Ceglia, Massimo De Vittorio, Michael Scalora, Giovanni Bruno, Antonella D’Orazio, and Marco Grande. 2019. "Graphene-Based Cylindrical Pillar Gratings for Polarization-Insensitive Optical Absorbers" Applied Sciences 9, no. 12: 2528. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9122528

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop