Next Article in Journal
Strain Transfer Analysis of a Clamped Fiber Bragg Grating Sensor
Previous Article in Journal
Calculation of Receiver Sensitivities in (Orthogonal) Subcarrier Multiplexing Microwave-Optical Links
Article Menu
Issue 2 (February) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Appl. Sci. 2017, 7(2), 187;

Subcritical Water Extraction of Ursolic Acid from Hedyotis diffusa

Beijing Key Laboratory of Lignocellulosic Chemistry, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
Institute of Food and Agricultural Standardization, China National Institute of Standardization, Beijing 100191, China
Minister of Education Engineering Research Center of Forestry Biomass Materials and Bioenergy, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Hidenori Otsuka
Received: 24 November 2016 / Revised: 9 December 2016 / Accepted: 13 December 2016 / Published: 15 February 2017
(This article belongs to the Section Chemistry)
Full-Text   |   PDF [2325 KB, uploaded 15 February 2017]   |  


An efficient and environmental-friendly extraction method has been developed for extraction of ursolic acid (UA) from Hedyotis diffusa by using subcritical water extraction (SWE). The experiments were carried out at different particle sizes (20–100 mesh), extraction temperature (120–200 °C), extraction time (10–50 min), solvent/solid ratio (20–40 mL/g), and extraction pressure (0.6–3.0 MPa). Response surface methodology (RSM) was employed to optimize SWE conditions, and the maximum UA yield was 6.45 mg/g material. Optimal conditions are as follows: Particle size of 80 mesh, extraction temperature at 157 °C and a solvent/solid ratio of 30 mL/g. The model of experimental response was proved to predict the experimental results very well and demonstrated that UA yield was mainly depended on solvent/solid ratio, followed by particle size and temperature. The purified extract was analyzed by electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (ESI-TOF-MS). The acquired precursor ion was m/z 455.3532, which is consistent with calculated value of UA. Furthermore, different extraction methods, including maceration extraction, heat reflux extraction, ultrasonic extraction, microwave-assisted extraction, and SWE were comparatively analyzed, which indicated that SWE was a time-saving, cost-saving and environment-friendly extraction technology for extraction of UA from Hedyotis diffusa. View Full-Text
Keywords: Hedyotis diffusa; ursolic acid (UA); subcritical water extraction (SWE); response surface methodology (RSM) Hedyotis diffusa; ursolic acid (UA); subcritical water extraction (SWE); response surface methodology (RSM)

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Supplementary material


Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Xiao, S.; Xi, X.; Tang, F.; Dai, J.; Liu, J.; Lei, J.; Wang, L. Subcritical Water Extraction of Ursolic Acid from Hedyotis diffusa. Appl. Sci. 2017, 7, 187.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Appl. Sci. EISSN 2076-3417 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top