Next Article in Journal
An Equivalent Modeling Method for Electromagnetic Radiation of PWM Fans with Multiple Radiation Sources
Previous Article in Journal
The Distribution Characteristics and Genesis Analysis of Overpressure in the Qiongzhusi Formation in the Zizhong Area, Sichuan Basin
Previous Article in Special Issue
Enhancing Crop Yield Predictions with PEnsemble 4: IoT and ML-Driven for Precision Agriculture
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

AI, IoT and Remote Sensing in Precision Agriculture

by
Antonio López-Quílez
Department of Statistics and Operations Research, Faculty of Mathematics, University of Valencia, 46100 Valencia, Spain
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(6), 2890; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15062890
Submission received: 24 February 2025 / Accepted: 3 March 2025 / Published: 7 March 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue AI,IoT and Remote Sensing in Precision Agriculture)

1. Introduction

The global population is projected to reach nearly 10 billion by the end of the 21st century, posing unprecedented challenges for agricultural systems to ensure food security while maintaining sustainability [1]. Achieving a proportional increase in agricultural production to feed this growing population is one of humanity’s most pressing challenges. This goal must be pursued against a backdrop of climate change, resource depletion, and increasingly frequent extreme weather events, all of which threaten the stability of global food systems [2]. To address these challenges, the integration of advanced technologies such as automation, sensors, yield monitors, the Internet of Things (IoT), drones, and robotics is essential. These tools, combined with Geographic Information Systems (GISs), artificial intelligence (AI), highly structured mathematical models, and big data analytics, form the foundation of a global “Digital Twin” for agriculture [3,4]. This conceptual framework enables the creation of virtual replicas of agricultural systems, facilitating site-specific conservation and management practices that enhance productivity, income, and global sustainability [5,6]. Spatial analysis of agricultural data plays a pivotal role in this context, allowing for precise decision making and resource optimization [7]. By leveraging these technologies, we can develop resilient agricultural systems capable of meeting future demands while minimizing environmental impacts.
Satellite and aerial imagery, along with ground-based sensors and yield monitors, provide critical insights into production variability at both macro- and micro-scales. These technologies enable the processing, representation, and modeling of vast amounts of agricultural data, facilitating precision agriculture practices [8,9]. Spatiotemporal models, in particular, offer significant advantages over traditional spatially explicit models by capturing the dynamic interplay between space and time, which is essential for understanding complex agricultural systems [10]. Hierarchical models further enhance this capability by addressing complex interactions through the specification of parameters that vary across multiple levels, often via the introduction of random effects [11]. This approach allows for more accurate predictions and tailored management strategies, ultimately improving crop yields and resource efficiency. By integrating these advanced modeling techniques with high-resolution data, we can better address the challenges of agricultural variability and sustainability in the face of global change.
The spread of transboundary plant pests and diseases, caused by fungi, bacteria, or viruses, has intensified significantly in recent years, leading to substantial agricultural losses and posing a serious threat to global food security [12,13]. These pathogens primarily spread through human activities, wind dispersal, or vector-borne mechanisms, making their control and prediction particularly challenging [14]. The spatial patterns of these outbreaks are influenced by a complex interplay of environmental, climatic, and socioeconomic factors. For instance, changes in climate—such as increased temperatures and altered precipitation patterns—create favorable conditions for the proliferation and spread of pests and diseases [15,16]. Additionally, shifts in land use, agricultural practices, and human habits further complicate our understanding of these processes, making it difficult to predict and mitigate their impacts [17]. Recent studies have highlighted the importance of hotspot mapping and regional analyses to identify areas at higher risk of pest introductions, taking into account environmental, anthropogenic, and spatial factors [18]. These approaches provide valuable insights into the drivers of pest spread and help prioritize surveillance and control efforts.
Addressing these challenges requires a multidisciplinary approach that integrates ecological, epidemiological, and socioeconomic data to develop effective monitoring and management strategies. Individual-based spatial epidemiological models, for example, offer a powerful tool for simulating the spread of plant diseases and evaluating the effectiveness of control measures [19]. Furthermore, optimized surveillance sampling strategies enable more efficient delimitation of outbreaks and resource allocation [20,21,22]. Bayesian statistical models have also proven useful in predicting disease risk [23]. By combining these advanced modeling techniques with real-time data and predictive analytics, we can improve our ability to anticipate and respond to emerging plant health threats, ultimately safeguarding agricultural productivity and global food security.

2. An Overview of Published Articles

This Special Issue brings together six cutting-edge research articles that explore innovative approaches to address critical challenges in precision agriculture, leveraging advanced technologies, such as the Internet of Things (IoT), machine learning (ML), and deep learning (DL). These studies collectively highlight the transformative potential of data-driven methodologies in enhancing agricultural productivity, sustainability, and decision making, offering solutions to some of the most pressing issues in modern farming.
The articles cover a wide range of agricultural challenges, from crop yield prediction and phenology forecasting to aquaculture management and automated quality assessment. By employing advanced modeling techniques, remote sensing, and hybrid optimization methods, the research demonstrates how digital tools can revolutionize agricultural practices. These contributions emphasize the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration and technological innovation in building resilient and efficient systems capable of adapting to a rapidly changing world.
Together, these studies showcase the diverse applications of IoT, ML, and DL in tackling agricultural challenges. By integrating cutting-edge technologies with domain-specific expertise, this Special Issue advances the development of more efficient, sustainable, and resilient agricultural systems, paving the way for future innovations in the field.
While the contributions gathered in this Special Issue represent significant advancements in the field of precision agriculture, they also underscore the need for further discussion and research to fully grasp the complexities inherent in modeling agricultural systems. The integration of technologies such as IoT, machine learning, and deep learning has opened new avenues for innovation, ensuring their accessibility and addressing the multifaceted interactions between environmental, climatic, and socioeconomic factors. Nonetheless, challenges still remain in scaling these solutions. It is my hope that this Special Issue will serve as a catalyst for stimulating new research initiatives, fostering interdisciplinary collaboration, and promoting actionable strategies to address the pressing challenges of modern agriculture. By building on these foundations, we can move closer to developing sustainable, efficient, and resilient agricultural systems that meet the needs of a growing global population.

3. Conclusions

In conclusion, this Special Issue highlights the critical role of advanced technologies and data-driven approaches in addressing the multifaceted challenges of modern agriculture. As the global population approaches 10 billion, the need for sustainable, efficient, and resilient agricultural systems has never been more urgent. The integration of tools such as IoT, AI, remote sensing, and spatiotemporal modeling offers transformative potential for enhancing productivity, optimizing resource use, and mitigating the impacts of climate change and pest outbreaks. The six articles featured in this Special Issue demonstrate innovative applications of these technologies, from crop yield prediction and phenology forecasting to disease surveillance and aquaculture management. However, the complexities of agricultural systems demand continued interdisciplinary collaboration and research to overcome barriers such as scalability, accessibility, and the dynamic interplay of environmental and socioeconomic factors. By building on the foundations laid out in this Special Issue, the scientific community can drive forward the development of sustainable solutions that ensure food security and environmental stewardship for future generations.

Acknowledgments

I am deeply grateful to the authors who responded to the call for papers, as well as to the reviewers, whose critical and constructive comments on the manuscripts greatly contributed to the quality of this publication. Finally, my sincere thanks are extended to the Applied Sciences staff for their highly professional editorial assistance during the preparation of this Special Issue.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
AIArtificial intelligence
DLDeep learning
GISsGeographic information systems
IoTInternet of Things
MLMachine learning

References

  1. United Nations. World Population Prospects 2019: Highlights; Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division: New York, NY, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  2. IPCC. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC): New York, NY, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  3. Kamilaris, A.; Kartakoullis, A.; Prenafeta-Boldú, F.X. A review on the practice of big data analysis in agriculture. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2017, 143, 23–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Purcell, W.; Neubauer, T. Digital Twins in Agriculture: A State-of-the-art review. Smart Agric. Technol. 2023, 3, 100094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liakos, K.G.; Busato, P.; Moshou, D.; Pearson, S.; Bochtis, D. Machine learning in agriculture: A review. Sensors 2018, 18, 2674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hua, W.; Heinemann, P.; He, L. Frost management in agriculture with advanced sensing, modeling, and artificial intelligent technologies: A review. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2025, 231, 110027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhang, C.; Kovacs, J.M. The application of small unmanned aerial systems for precision agriculture: A review. Precis. Agric. 2012, 13, 693–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mulla, D.J. Twenty five years of remote sensing in precision agriculture: Key advances and remaining knowledge gaps. Biosyst. Eng. 2013, 114, 358–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lepnaan Dayil, J.; Akande, O.; Mahmoud, A.E.D.; Kimera, R.; Omole, O. Challenges and opportunities in Machine learning for bioenergy crop yield Prediction: A review. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2025, 73, 104057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cressie, N.; Wikle, C.K. Statistics for Spatio-Temporal Data; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  11. Banerjee, S.; Carlin, B.P.; Gelfand, A.E. Hierarchical Modeling and Analysis for Spatial Data; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  12. Savary, S.; Willocquet, L.; Pethybridge, S.J.; Esker, P.; McRoberts, N.; Nelson, A. The global burden of pathogens and pests on major food crops. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2019, 3, 430–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Finger, R.; Möhring, N. The emergence of pesticide-free crop production systems in Europe. Nat. Plants 2024, 10, 360–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bebber, D.P.; Ramotowski, M.A.T.; Gurr, S.J. Crop pests and pathogens move polewards in a warming world. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2014, 3, 985–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chakraborty, S.; Newton, A.C. Climate change, plant diseases and food security: An overview. Plant Pathol. 2011, 60, 2–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kumar, D.; Mukhopadhyay, R. Climate change and plant pathogens: Understanding dynamics, risks and mitigation strategies. Plant Pathol. 2024, 74, 59–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ristaino, J.B.; Anderson, P.K.; Bebber, D.P.; Brauman, K.A.; Cunniffe, N.J.; Fedoroff, N.V.; Finegold, C.; Garrett, K.A.; Gilligan, C.A.; Jones, C.M.; et al. The persistent threat of emerging plant disease pandemics to global food security. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2022239118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Rosace, M.C.; Conesa, D.V.; López-Quílez, A.; Marini, L.; Martinez-Beneito, M.A.; Nardi, D.; Rossi, V.; Vicent, A.; Cendoya, M. Hotspot mapping of pest introductions in the EU: A regional analysis of environmental, anthropogenic and spatial effects. Biol. Invasions 2025, 27, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cendoya, M.; Navarro-Quiles, A.; López-Quílez, A.; Vicent, A.; Conesa, D. An individual-based spatial epidemiological model for the spread of plant diseases. J. Agric. Biol. Environ. Stat. 2025, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lázaro, E.; Sesé, M.; López-Quílez, A.; Conesa, D.; Dalmau, V.; Ferrer, A.; Vicent, A. Tracking the outbreak: An optimized sequential adaptive strategy for Xylella fastidiosa delimiting surveys. Biol. Invasions 2021, 23, 3243–3261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sun, H.; Douma, J.C.; Schenk, M.F.; van der Werf, W. Comparing inward and outward strategies for delimiting non-native plant pest outbreaks. J. Pest Sci. 2025, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Monsalve, N.C.; López-Quílez, A. Prediction and Surveillance Sampling Assessment in Plant Nurseries and Fields. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 9005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Martínez-Minaya, J.; Conesa, D.; López-Quílez, A.; Mira, J.L.; Vicent, A. Modelling inoculum availability of Plurivorosphaerella nawae in persimmon leaf litter with Bayesian beta regression. Phytopathology 2021, 111, 1184–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

López-Quílez, A. AI, IoT and Remote Sensing in Precision Agriculture. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 2890. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15062890

AMA Style

López-Quílez A. AI, IoT and Remote Sensing in Precision Agriculture. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(6):2890. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15062890

Chicago/Turabian Style

López-Quílez, Antonio. 2025. "AI, IoT and Remote Sensing in Precision Agriculture" Applied Sciences 15, no. 6: 2890. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15062890

APA Style

López-Quílez, A. (2025). AI, IoT and Remote Sensing in Precision Agriculture. Applied Sciences, 15(6), 2890. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15062890

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop