Next Article in Journal
Detection of Personality Traits Using Handwriting and Deep Learning
Previous Article in Journal
The Construction and Investigation of Two-Dimensional Re-Entrant Multiphase Honeycomb Lattice Metafluid
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Numerical Simulation of Mechanical Response of Tunnel Breakage in the Construction of Cross Passages by Mechanical Excavation Method Using Flat-Face Cutterhead

1
Zhongyifeng Construction Group Co., Ltd., Suzhou 215131, China
2
School of Transportation, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China
3
College of Civil Engineering, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215009, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(4), 2153; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15042153
Submission received: 2 January 2025 / Revised: 10 February 2025 / Accepted: 12 February 2025 / Published: 18 February 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Civil Engineering)

Abstract

:
Mechanical construction has gradually been applied in cross passages of metro lines, but more mechanical mechanisms should be revealed. The section between Jingrong Street Station and Kunjia Road Station in Suzhou Metro Line 11 adopts a mechanical construction method to construct a cross passage. A novel flat-face cutterhead, which is different from curved cutter head is first used to cut and break the main tunnel in construction of cross passage. Based on the background of practical engineering, the finite element method was applied to simulate the breaking process of the main tunnel to explore the dynamic variation in the mechanical response of the segments cut by the flat-face cutterhead. The results indicate that the maximum vertical displacement caused by cutting mainly concentrates on the top of the fully cut rings. The maximum horizontal displacement occurs at the waist on the side of the tunnel portal in the semi-cut rings. The axial force level inside both types of segment rings reaches its peak after the tunnel is formed. The maximum axial force exists at the bottom and top of the fully cut ring and semi-cut ring, respectively. The change in the displacement around the portal is not substantial before the third stage, and it begins to increase significantly from the moment the concrete at the portal is penetrated. The existence of the pre-support system effectively controls the displacement of the third and fourth fully cut rings. Emphasis should be placed on reinforcing the soil near the top and waist of the second to fifth rings. The findings demonstrate that the application of flat-face cutterhead in mechanical construction of cross passages is safe, reliable, and efficient, and can provide valuable suggestions for further cutting parameters and soil reinforcement as well.

1. Introduction

Metro is an important infrastructure for a city to build a public transportation network. Metro construction in major cities across the globe has amassed abundant engineering experience. According to the design code for the metro of China, when the continuous length of two single-line section tunnels is greater than 600 m, a cross passage should be set up for fire evacuation. Generally, the width of the cross passage is less than 2 m, the height is not more than 2.5 m, and the interval is 250–350 m.
The traditional construction of cross passages is mostly carried out by the freezing method or another formation of reinforcement, and then by manual excavation. However, it is reported that the construction of cross passages by these reinforcement plans may cause engineering accidents. In complex condition of geology, the quality of the soil reinforcement method also has some risks, which makes the soil of the excavation surface unstable. Then, the instability of the soil not only causes damage to the tunnel lining structure, but it also causes the destruction of the surrounding buildings. Therefore, after the completion of tunnel construction in the main section of the excavation of the contact channel, it should be ensured that the adjacent main tunnel does not lose stability without cracking. And the adverse impact on the environment should be minimized. The excessive soil deformation may cause: damage to municipal pipelines, ground failure, and differential settlement of nearby houses.
In recent years, the mechanical construction method to build the cross passages began to be applied. Gao et al. [1] reported the application of pipe jacking method in the cross passage of Nanjing Metro shield tunnel, where rectangular pipe joints with dimensions of 1.68 m × 2.8 m were used. In the construction of the link road between Tuen Mun and Chek Lap Kok Link in Hong Kong, 44 crossing passages were constructed under geological conditions under high water pressure using a mud pipe jacking machine of 3.6 m diameter [2]. The innovative mechanical construction methods can effectively control production progress while reducing risks. However, in October 2017, there was a rupture of the pipe wall near the connection passage constructed by the pipe jacking method near Tuen Mun. Ma et al. [3] reported a case project of a cross passage excavated using the TBM method. The key risk control measures for the construction, the TBM operating parameters, measuring of the ground and building settlements, and the tunnel’s mechanical responses were discussed.
The T joint structure of the cross passage and the main tunnel is an important aspect of safety for the construction. Excavation of the cross passage often causes the settlement and convergence of the main tunnel. And the phenomenon of stress concentration will occur at the joint part, which may cause damage to the tunnel structure. Liu et al. [4] carried out the full-scale tests on the cross passages by mechanical cutting.
More modeling tests on cross passage with the mechanical method were conducted to discover more about the response characteristics of tunnel and applicability of the method. A serials of centrifugal model test were completed by Lu et al. [5,6]. The mechanism of stress concentration and different types of openings were investigated.
Zhang et al. [7] reported that under the conditions of tunnel opening and support dismantling, the deformation and stress changes in the main tunnel structure are obvious, and deformation measuring should be strengthened during construction. Yang et al. [8] carried out a model test. During the cutting process, the circular axial force of the main tunnel decreased while shrinkage deformation occurs. And the radial axial force of the main tunnel increases while tensile deformation occurs. After the completion of the tunnel opening, the circular and radial axial forces of the main tunnel show an increasing trend. In the actual construction process, considering the overall safety of the main tunnel, the support should be set inside the main tunnel.
In a based 3D finite element analysis, Jaysiri et al. [9] proposed the 3D shell-spring approach. Tan et al. [10] studied the displacement and mechanical response of the shield tunnel with a diameter of 10.5 m in the process of cross-passage construction. Wang et al. [11] analyzed the force of the special segments under the structural state before and after construction. By using the finite element numerical simulation method, calculated that obvious stress concentration appeared in the opening area of the main tunnel during the opening of the cross passages. In terms of microtunnelling technology, Benato et al. [12] and Oreste et al. [13] analyzed the effects of a support system and grouting materials.
Some studies have tested and simulated the influence of mechanical construction on the segments. Zhang et al. [14] carried out numerical simulation analysis on the broken openings of different segments. It is found that with the reduction in the cutting hole strength, the maximum displacement of the normal tunnel and the segment displacement of the opening increased. Changing the strength value of the opening influences the overall deformation of the normal tunnel and the displacements of the opening segments, but the effect is not large. Cao et al. [15] studied the mechanical behavior of the segment at the intersection of the tunnel and the cross passage. Curtain grouting is better than small pipe grouting. The results of the centrifugal model test show that the maximum tensile stress and the maximum compressive stress of the inner part of the arch are more than the design value of the tensile strength of C60 concrete, and there is a risk of rupture. Composite pipe segments should be used in construction.
Recently, our research group put forward a cross-passage construction method of ring cutting and push-in. The machine is shown in Figure 1. With the innovative technology of ring cutting and segment assembly, the construction can not only complete the excavation of cross passages safely and efficiently, but also control the surface settlement of ground well, which will obtain better social and economic benefits. And it is suitable for the construction of the cross passage for the shield tunnel section in the water abundant area, especially for the projects of cross passage with poor soil stability, short construction period, and high environmental protection requirements.
From the background above, most of previous research is based on steady-state analysis of different stages of construction by mechanical method. It is considered that more dynamic analysis of the construction process should be investigated. Meanwhile, different from the current research and analysis of cutting the main tunnel using arc cutter head, the study analyzes the main tunnel hole breaking using flat-face cutter head. Therefore, based on the engineering background of Jingrong Street station- Kunjia Road station of Suzhou Metro Line 11, the numerical simulation is conducted to study the mechanical response of the segments in the construction of the flat-face cutter head pushing method, which could provide some engineering application suggestions.

2. Project Overview

The design boundary mileage of Jingrong Street Station—Kunjia Road station is from R DK26 + 567.115 to RDK27 + 636.075, with short chain of 1.041 m and length of 1067.919 m. Left line mileage is from LDK26 + 567.115 to LDK27 + 636.075, with short chain of 1.247 m and length of 1067.713 m. The total length of the left and right line tunnel is 2135.632 m.
After leaving Jingrong Street Station, the left and right lines of the tunnel run south through the current open space and pass under the planned road. The plots on both sides are planned commercial and residential areas. The left and right lines turn left at a curve with a radius of 700 m and pass under Jingwang Road, continue to run southeast, pass under the current farmland and turn under Xiadong Street with a curve with a radius of 500 m. To the south through the North Guanjing Bridge and the side through the 110 kv power pipe tower to reach the Kunjia Road station. The left and right lines are constructed by the shield tunneling method. As shown in Figure 2, a cross passage and pump house is set up in the mileage of RDK27 + 139.123.
The cross passage is located under Jingwang Road, where there is no structure on the ground. The center mileage of the left and right line shield tunnel at the cross passage is LDK27 + 149.198 (RDK27 + 154.500), the center distance of the tunnel at the cross passage is 13.0 m, and the elevation of track surface of the left and right line tunnel is −19.131 m and −19.129 m, respectively. The ground elevation is about +2.60 m. The covering soil thickness of the tunnel in this section is 8.6~16.3 m. The structural form of the section is the circular tunnel assembly segment of shield method. As shown in Figure 3, the inner diameter of the segment rings is 5.9 m, with the outer diameter is 6.6 m. The width of the standard ring is 1.2 m, while the width of the special ring for the cross passage is also 1.2 m.
The cross passage is located under Jingwang Road, where there is no structure on the ground. The center mileage of the left and right line shield tunnel at the cross passage is LDK27 + 149.198 (RDK27 + 154.500), the center distance of the tunnel at the cross passage is 13.0 m, and the elevation of track surface of the left and right line tunnel is −19.131 m and −19.129 m, respectively. The ground elevation is about +2.60 m.

3. Numerical Modeling

To study the mechanical response of the segment during the cutting process of the main tunnel cross passage by using the flat-face cutterhead, the three-dimensional model of the six rings of the main tunnel with a cross passage established by using finite element software for numerical simulation analysis.
Abaqus/Explicit 2021 is chosen for numerical simulation analysis in this paper because of its powerful computing power and universal simulation function. Establishing a corresponding three-dimensional model of the six-ring main tunnel in the part module, apply external pressure in the load module and define the rotation speed and thrust speed for the cutterhead, select the dynamic explicit analysis step in ABAQUS and calculate.

3.1. Establishment of the Finite Element Model

Reinforced concrete pipe segments are used to assemble the tunnel model according to the actual project, as shown in Figure 4 and Figure 5. Each ring segment is divided into six blocks along the ring direction, namely three standard blocks (B1, B2, B3), two adjacent blocks (L1, L2), and one capping block (KT). The outer diameter of the segment is 6.6 m, the width of the segment is 1.2 m, and the thickness is 0.35 m. The reinforced concrete segment is with strength grade of C50, and part of the segment is made of steel-mixed special segment. The steel reinforcement has a strength grade of HPB300 and HRB400.
The tunnel portal is made of concrete grade of C50, and the inner steel plate around the tunnel portal is as shown in Figure 3. The tunnel segments are assembled with straight ring and wedge turning ring with double-sided wedge. The wedge quantity is 39.6 mm and the angle is 0.3437706°. The pipe segments are connected by straight bolts and bent bolts. Surface contact is used to connect different parts of the model. To simplify the processing, bolts are set as beam units embedded between concrete segments. As shown in Figure 5, the steel reinforcement cage is positioned by rotation in the assembly module and embedded into the segments, respectively.
The excavation diameter of the tunneling machine is 3300 mm, and the flat-face cutterhead on the tunneling machine consists of one center fish tail cutter, 24 shell cutters, and 18 concrete cutters. The finite element model is shown in Figure 6.

3.2. Material Structure and Parameters

The structural material parameters are shown in Table 1.
To reflect the damage variation in concrete segments in the simulation, the constitutive model of Concrete Damaged Plasticity (CDP) is applied for the concrete segments [16]. When concrete is in the linear elastic stage, the material is in a non-damaged state, but when the material enters the yield stage, the damage factor is introduced to reduce the elastic modulus of concrete, and the stress–strain relation is as follows:
σ = ( 1 d ) E 0 : ( ε ε p l )
where σ denotes the stress tensor; d is the concrete damage factor ( d [ 0 , 1 ] ); ε is the total strain tensor; ε p l is the plastic strain of concrete; E 0 is the initial elastic modulus of concrete.
The damage factor is calculated using the strain energy calculation method with reference to the classical damage theory of Najar, the calculation method is as follows:
d = 1 2 f ( ε ) d ε / E 0 ε 2
where f ( ε ) d ε is the Gauss integral of strain corresponding to the stress from the original point to the peak stress on the stress–strain curve of concrete.
The values of d range from 0 to 1. And 0 and 1 represent the initial no damage state and the theoretical complete damage state, respectively. In general, a damage factor is generally defined before approaching 1, which is set as the damage threshold of material progressive failure. The mesh that reaches the damage threshold in the software calculation will fail and automatically exit the calculation.
The linear elastic constitutive model is used for the steel-concrete composite segments. According to the classic Halpin-Tsai model, the steel-concrete composite segments are simplified to short fiber composite materials, and their equivalent elastic modulus is obtained by the following formula [17]:
E = 1 + ξ η V f 1 η V E m
η = E f / E m 1 E f / E m + ξ
where E is the equivalent elastic modulus of composite material; Em is the elastic modulus of steel segment; Ef is elastic modulus of concrete; ξ is the reinforcement degree of steel segment; Vf is the volume specific gravity of steel fiber in the segment.
The Drucker-Prager (D-P) constitutive model is applied for the concrete material of the cutting portal. The D-P model is widely used in brittle materials such as rocks, ceramics and concrete, which can reflect the change trend of the strength characteristics of brittle materials under multi-axial stress. The Shear Damage model is selected to define damage, and the combination of damage and fracture is used for cutting brittle materials. In addition, the process of cutting tool is realized by setting the advancing speed and rotation speed of the tool model. The advancing speed is 0.05 mm/s and the rotation speed is 1 RPM. The damage threshold is set for the concrete material of the machinable tunnel portal. Make the material at the hole door under the cutting action of the cutter head, when the material reaches the damage point, the unit is automatically deleted and exits the calculation.

3.3. Analysis of Working Conditions

The load-structure method is adopted for analysis, and the displacement constraint of land on the tunnel boundary is established, and the two ends of the tunnel are fixed constraints. The loads considered by T joint include soil load, water pressure and material weight. The condition at starting stage is shown in Figure 7. And the calculated external load is applied as shown in Figure 8.
At the stage of initial working conditions, the main tunnel naturally deforms to a stable state under the action of external water and soil pressure. Then, at the stage of pre-support condition, the inner support system starts to work, and the support force is transferred to the segment at the vault and bottom of the arch through the upper and lower support boots. At the next stage of cutting conditions, the machine began to excavate; at the same time, the segments behind the cutting direction were affected by the reaction frame. And the total reaction force of the reaction frame is set as 1000 kN. The cutter head begins to act on the tunnel portal until the concrete of the tunnel portal is completely grinding and spalling.

4. Analysis of Numerical Calculation Results

With the calculation software, the explicit dynamic calculation is used to obtain the simulation results of the initial fracture of the flat-face cutterhead, and the construction mechanical characteristics are analyzed.
To fully reflect the construction mechanics characteristics of the main tunnel segment of the cutter head grinding, as shown in Figure 9, four analysis stages are set up: stage I, stage II, and stage III and stage IV. And the cutting process in percentage and the ratios of the cutter displacement to the tunnel diameter (L/D) also represent the states.
In the first stage, the double-track tunnel was completed and the cross passage had not been excavated, and the tunnel was subjected to stratum load. In the second stage, after the operation of the internal support system, the top bracing force generated by the oil cylinder is transmitted to the pipe segments by the bracing boots. In the third stage, the hole portal is ground from the cutter head until the upper and lower parts of the hole are penetrated by the cutter head. In stage IV, the segments of the tunnel portal are completely grinded. The cutting process in percentage has been marked. And 0% represents before cutting, while 100% represents that the portal has been totally cut through.

4.1. Deformation Analysis of Main Tunnel

Due to the symmetry of the main tunnel segment rings, the semi-cut ring and the fully cut ring on one side are selected, and the construction mechanical characteristics of them under the cutting action of the cutter head are analyzed.
Figure 10 shows two different segment rings: the segment ring cut by the cutter head center tool is completely cut off, which is the fully cut ring. Only a small part of the segment ring cut by the tool on the left and right edge of the cutter head is cut off, which is the semi-cut ring. Because the construction mechanical characteristics of the two are different, the mechanical data of the two kinds of segment rings are extracted in the post-processing, and the mechanical characteristics of the semi-cut ring and the fully cut ring are compared and analyzed.

4.1.1. Deformation of Tunnel Main Tunnel Lining Grinded by Flat-Face Cutter Head

Firstly, the displacements of fully cut ring and semi-cut ring segments in four different construction stages are extracted.
For the fully cut segment, as seen in Figure 11 and Figure 12, the maximum displacement in the horizontal direction occurs in stage I, the maximum displacement in the vertical direction occurs in stage IV, the maximum displacement values are 5.812 mm, 6.223 mm, respectively. In stage I, the segment is subjected to soil and water pressure, and the maximum displacement appears in the vertical direction. In stage II, the internal support system begins to function, and the displacement of the segments under the support of the bracing boots is reduced. With the continuous driving of the cutter head, the cutter head gradually grinds the concrete of the tunnel door, and the displacement of the segment in the horizontal direction increases due to the jack-up action of the cutter head to the tunnel door and the reaction force of the reaction frame. After the tunnel is constructed, the top and bottom of the tunnel are squeezed by water and soil pressure, and the displacement increases further.
From the results of Figure 13 and Figure 14, it can be seen that the maximum horizontal and vertical displacement of the semi-cutting ring occurred in Stage IV, the maximum displacement values were 6.453 mm and 6.028 mm. Because the B3 segment on the semi-cutting ring is in contact with the waist of the tunnel door, the disturbance generated by the cutter head driving has a greater influence on it. Therefore, the lateral displacement of the B3 segment on the semi-cutting ring in contact with both sides of the tunnel portal is larger. In the vertical direction, the displacement of the semi-cut ring and the fully cut ring is relatively close. Overall, none of them exceeded the maximum allowable displacement values of 30 mm in design code [18].

4.1.2. Displacement Comparison Between Different Rings

To study the change in displacement of the two cutting rings throughout the cutting process, since the larger values of displacement are mainly found in the top, bottom and waist of the tube ring, the displacement of semi-cutting rings and full-cutting ring is compared to each of these three locations.
As can be seen from Figure 15, the displacement of the fully cut ring is large in the direction of 180°, with a maximum displacement of nearly 5.8 mm. After the tube sheet is supported, its displacement is significantly small, reducing the earth arch effect to a certain extent. After the blade began digging, the displacement in this direction began to increase and gradually stabilized. The displacement of the semi-cut ring in the direction of 180° is small, and its overall pattern of change is similar to that of the fully cut rings, but the displacement is smaller than that of the fully cut ring.
As shown in Figure 16, at 90° angle, the displacement of the fully cut ring is greater than the displacement of the semi-cut ring. A pre-support system greatly decreases the displacement of the top of the tube ring. After the cutting begins, the top shift in the two rings gradually increases with the cutting. It is worth noting that the top of both rings produced a significant displacement downward when the cave opening was to be opened. After the hole was opened, the displacement stabilized.
As shown in Figure 17, at the direction of 270°, the displacement laws of the fully cut ring and the semi-cut ring are still approximate. Among them, the fully cut ring has a larger displacement. After the advance support, the displacement of the two is reduced, and the displacement gradually increases after the shield machine begins to cut. Like the displacement at the top of the tube ring, the bottom of the tube ring creates a larger displacement to the inner side of the tunnel as the portal is nearly opened.

4.2. Displacement Analysis of Measuring Point

According to the results of the processed cloud image, the segment displacements of the fully cut ring and the semi-cut ring in the four construction stages are analyzed above. To further analyze the regularity of segment displacement, after the main tunnel is holed, measuring point 1, 2, and 3 as shown in Figure 18 are, respectively, taken for research. The displacement data graphs of the three points in the x and y directions are obtained.
Under the action of soil and water pressure, the main tunnel is compressed and presents as the shape of a flat duck egg. As shown in Figure 19, the three measuring points are offset towards the outside of the main tunnel. And the displacement of the points decreases after the internal support system works. With the continuous excavation of the cutter head, the displacement of measuring point 3 increases gradually and reaches the maximum value after the hole is broken. After entering Phase III, the upper and lower parts of the tunnel portal are worn through, and the segments of the upper and lower parts of the tunnel door are squeezed by earth pressure and the reverse thrust of the reaction frame, and the measurement points 1 and 2 begin to move towards the inner side of the main tunnel, and the horizontal displacement reaches the maximum in the tunnel forming stage.
In terms of the displacement of Y direction (as shown in Figure 20), in the first stage, soil and water pressure moved measuring points 1 and 2 to the inside of the tunnel. After the second stage, with the cutter head starting to cut the tunnel portal, the displacement trend of measuring point 1 and 2 are significant, and the displacement gradually increased. From the third stage when the upper and lower parts of the tunnel door have just been worn through to about 15,000 s, the displacement of the first and second measuring points are increasing. When the concrete in the waist of the tunnel door was about to be destroyed, the pushing force of the shield machine is small, and the displacement of each measuring point in the vertical direction is also reduced. After the hole is formed, the displacement of the points tends to be stable.

4.3. Displacement Analysis Along the Direction of the Main Tunnel

To study the influence of the mechanical cutting process on the displacement of the main tunnel, the vertical displacements of the segments at the top and bottom of the main tunnel along the direction of the main tunnel were analyzed. And the horizontal displacements of waist on both sides of the main tunnel were analyzed as well.

4.3.1. Displacement at the Top of the Main Tunnel

As shown in Figure 21, the displacements of the two rings of segments farthest from the center of the main tunnel are relatively small, while the displacements of the two rings of segments at the center of the main tunnel are the largest. After the pre-support in the second stage, the vertical displacement at the top of the tunnel was controlled, and the pre-support system played its role. After entering the cutting stage, the vertical settlement at the top of the main tunnel gradually increased with the progress of cutting.

4.3.2. Displacement at the Bottom of the Main Tunnel

In Figure 22, we can see that, similar to the vertical displacement of the top of the main tunnel, the vertical displacement of the bottom of the third and fourth ring segments is the largest. Because of the existence of the joint surface, the displacement of the bottom of the second to fifth ring segments is also large. In addition, the pre-support also effectively controlled the displacement at the bottom of the main tunnel.

4.3.3. Displacement at the Waist of the Main Tunnel

Based on the compression effect of water and soil pressure on the tunnel, the displacement of the waist on both sides of the tunnel should be analyzed emphatically. It can be seen in Figure 23 that the displacement of the main tunnel segment on the horizontal side of the tunnel door is relatively consistent except for the tunnel working condition. The displacement of the segments on both sides of the openings is larger due to the thrust action of the shield cutter head on the tunnel entrance. With the jacking of the cutter head and the destruction of concrete at the entrance, the water and soil pressure at the entrance act further, and the waist of the tunnel has a large displacement in the horizontal direction.
As shown in Figure 24, the displacement trend of the back side of the main tunnel is relatively regular, and the horizontal displacement of the waist on the back side gradually increases with the excavation of the cutterhead. Among them, the horizontal displacement of the third and fourth ring is greater than that of the other segments due to the action of the support frame. It could be suggested that the soil near the top and waist of the second to fifth ring should be reinforced with emphasis.

4.4. Internal Force Analysis

The direction of the internal force analysis for the segments is shown in Figure 25. And Figure 26 and Figure 27 show the axial force distribution of full-cutting ring and semi-cutting ring tube in different construction stages, respectively.
It can be seen from Figure 26 that the axial force at the top and bottom of the fully cut ring is larger than that at the waist of the fully cut ring, andsmaller before the cross passage is excavated. During the second stage, upon the application of the pre-support, the axial force of the cutting ring is changed, and the structural force is thereby enhanced. At the same time, the phenomenon emerges that the axial force at the waist becomes larger and that at the top and bottom turns out to be smaller because of the pre-support system. In the third stage, the cutterhead penetrates the upper and lower parts of the portal, which changes the stress state of the whole cutting ring again to a certain extent, resulting in a situation where the axial forces at the top and bottom of the ring are large and the axial force at the waist is small. In the fourth stage, with the completion of grinding the concrete at the portal, the bearing capacity of the portal weakens, and the fully cut ring is obviously affected by the vertical water and soil pressure, leading to changes in the level of the axial force. However, the change in the axial force at the waist is rather insignificant.
Compared with the fully cut ring, the axial force level of the semi-cut rings is smaller, and its axial force variation pattern is different. Shown in Figure 27, for the semi-cut ring, the axial force at the waist on one side of the portal is the smallest, while the axial forces in the other three directions are relatively larger. From the second stage to the third stage, after the upper and lower parts of the tunnel portal were polished by the cutterhead, the overall axial force of the semi-cut ring shows little change. However, the axial force in the segment on the back side of the driving direction began to decline. In the fourth stage, due to the completion of the portal, the lateral water and soil pressure on one side of the tunnel varies, and the axial force of the semi-cut ring on this side also decreases correspondingly. Meanwhile, the axial force in the segment on the back of the driving direction remains basically unchanged.

4.5. Analysis of Bending Moment of the Segment Ring

The fully cut and semi-cut ring in the main tunnel were selected for bending moment analysis. Around the fully cut ring, every 5° was taken as a section, while the resultant bending moment of the section was calculated. The bending moment diagram of the fully cut and semi-cut ring at four different stages is obtained as shown in Figure 28 and Figure 29.
According to the bending moment value, the bending moment value of the semi-cut ring is larger than that of the fully cut ring. The maximum bending moment occurs at the waist of the portal. The pre-support system alleviates the compression and bending of the segment reasonably and reduces the bending moment in the segment. In the third stage, with the exception that the upper and lower parts of the door have been penetrated, the cutter head has been grinding towards both sides at the back of the portal. Because of the larger contact surface between the cutting portal and the semi-cut ring, the disturbance of the semi-cut ring is prominent during the jacking process of the cutterhead. And the sudden change in the bending moment of the semi-cut ring within the range of 45° above and below the arch waist is more conspicuous than that of the fully cut ring, and the bending moment value is also larger. In the fourth stage, the cutter head of the shield machine successfully cut through the portal ceased its contact with the segment. This led to a change in stress state of the segment, and the bending moment in the segment rings increased under the influence of external pressure.

5. Conclusions

In this paper, based on the project of cross passage in Suzhou Metro Line 11, the finite element method is employed to analyze the mechanical response when the flat-face cutterhead is used to open the portal at the main tunnel. The following conclusions can be drawn.
  • Among the six rings of segments at the connection part, the maximum vertical displacement caused by cutting mainly concentrates on the top of the fully cut ring. The maximum horizontal displacement appears at the waist on the side of the tunnel portal of the semi-cut ring. The maximum displacement of the segment ring appears after the formation of the third stage, and the position is at the waist of the tunnel entrance. This is mainly caused by the jacking of the plane cutter head during excavation. The maximum displacement value of 6.453 mm and 6.223 mm are under the allowable value in the Chinese code for monitoring measurement of urban rail transit engineering (30 mm) [18].
  • From the displacement of the measuring points. With the pushing of the cutterhead of the shield tunneling machine, due to the disturbance of the cutterhead and the extrusion of external earth pressure, the upper and lower parts of the segment in contact with the tunnel portal undergo significant displacements in the horizontal and vertical directions. Moreover, the displacement increases steadily over time and then stabilizes to about after the formation of the portal. The end of the segment on the waist side of the tunnel in contact with the tunnel portal only experiences a substantial displacement in the horizontal direction, while the displacement in the vertical direction is not significant, with a value of about 1 mm.
  • Alongside the direction of the main tunnel, the displacement of the middle four rings increases consistently with the process of cutting, with the maximum of exceeding 6 mm. The existence of the pre-support system effectively controls the displacement of the third and fourth fully cut rings. It is suggested that the soil near the second to fifth ring should be reinforced with emphasis.
  • When using the flat-face cutterhead to open the portal, in four different stages, the stress distribution in the segment is not uniform. The stress changes are more regular, and the maximum stress occurs in stage I. Although the maximum stress response value of the segment is large, it is not sufficient to cause damage to the concrete and result in the formation of cracks in the segment.
  • The pattern of bending moment variation is more pronounced in the segment rings. As the cutterhead keeps advancing, the bending moment inside the segment ring within the range of 45° above and below the arch waist first decreases and then increases. It has been verified that the support system optimized the structural stress state. On the other hand, after the upper and lower parts of the tunnel are drilled through, the load is gradually taken up by the semi-cut ring, and the bending moment of the semi-cut ring after the third stage is larger than that of the fully cut ring.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.L. and X.L.; methodology, B.L. and X.L.; software, B.L.; validation, B.L.; writing—original draft preparation, B.L. and X.L.; writing—review and editing, X.L. and S.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Suzhou Science and Technology Plan (Basic Research) Project (No. SJC2023002) and Open Fund of Jiangsu Urban Underground Space Development and Utilization and Safety Protection Engineering Research Center (No. 2023-CSDXJJ-01).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Bingyi Li and Xianghong Li were employed by the company Zhongyifeng Construction Group Co., Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the re-search was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gao, B.; Chen, Y.K. Application of pipe jacking method in construction of contact tunnels of a subway shield zone tunnel. Constr. Technol. 2005, 6, 19–20+23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Schwob, A.; Cagnat, E.; Chen, S.; Chan, A.W.Y.; Wai, C.N.C. Tuen mun–chek lap kok link: An outstanding sub-sea tunnel project in Hong Kong. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng.-Civ. Eng. 2019, 173, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ma, Y.K.; Yan, W.; Song, Y.J.; Zhang, M.Q.; Zhou, S.; Xiong, T.F.; Geng, J.; Li, X.F.; Cheng, X.S. Safety and environmental impact control of cross passage construction in soft soil strata using tunnel boring machine method. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 15269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Liu, X.; Gao, Y.; Ramos, G.; Turmo, J.; Zhu, Y. Full-scale tests on segmental lining with mechanically cut cross-passage opening. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2024, 151, 105874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lu, P.; Yuan, D.J.; Luo, W.P.; Jin, D.L.; Liu, M.G. Centrifugal Model Test Study on the Mechanical Characteristics of Shield Tunnels Influenced by Different Types of Openings for Cross Passages. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 6421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lu, P.; Yuan, D.J.; Jin, D.L.; Luo, W.P.; Liu, M.G. Centrifugal model tests on the structural response of the shield tunnel when constructing cross passages by mechanical methods. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2022, 128, 104621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhang, H.Z.; Shu, W.J.; Meng, S.B. Structure stability analysis of subsea tunnel link passage constructed with shield method. Urban. Mass. Transit. 2022, 9, 181–186+190. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yang, J.D.; Zheng, R.Y.; Zheng, S.Y. Experimental study on cutting model of receiving end of t-joint part of mechanical connection channels. Constr. Technol. 2022, 3, 12–17. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jayasiri, N.S.; Chao, K.C.; Phien-Wej, N.; Duangsano, O.; Asanprakit, A. Design and analysis of tunnel cross-passage openings: 3D finite element analysis versus 3D shell-spring approach. Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. 2022, 7, 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tan, Z.S.; Li, Z.L.; Tang, W.; Chen, X.Y.; Duan, J.M. Research on stress characteristics of segment structure during the construction of the large-diameter shield tunnel and cross-passage. Symmetry 2020, 12, 1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, J.W.; Li, F.C.; Chen, Z.B.; Li, B.S.; Zhu, J. Finite element analysis of T-joint of mechanical connecting channels. Adv. Mech. Eng. 2020, 12, 1687814020977747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Benato, A.; Gaida, E.; Oggeri, C.; Oreste, P. Analysis of the Importance of the Filling Material Characteristics Injected Around the Precast Concrete Lining in the Microtunnelling Technology. Geotech. Geol. Eng. 2023, 41, 2775–2785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Oreste, P.; Sebastiani, D.; Spagnoli, G.; de Lillis, A. Analysis of the Behavior of the Two—Component Grout Around a Tunnel Segmental Lining on the Basis of Experimental Results and Analytical Approaches. Transp. Geotech. 2021, 29, 100570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, F.L.; Liu, Z.H.; Zhu, Y.H. Stress characteristics and weakening analysis of t-joint of connection passage by mechanical excavation method. Chin. J. Geotech. Eng. 2022, 44, 116–119. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cao, Y.T. Study on Mechanical Behavior of Segments at the Intersection of Super Large Diameter Shield Tunnel and Connecting Passage. Master’s thesis, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Krajcinovic, D.; Fonseka, G.U. The Continuous Damage Theory of Brittle Materials, Part 1: General Theory. J. Appl. Mech. 1981, 48, 809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Affdl, J.C.H.; Kardos, J.L. The Halpin-Tsai Equations: A Review. Polym. Eng. Sci. 1976, 16, 344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. GB 50911-2013; Code for Monitoring Measurement of Urban Rail Transit Engineering. Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Construction of the People’s Republic of China. China Architecture & Building Press: Beijing, China, 2013. (In Chinese)
Figure 1. Machine of ring cutting and push-in machine.
Figure 1. Machine of ring cutting and push-in machine.
Applsci 15 02153 g001
Figure 2. Overview of the cross passage and main tunnel.
Figure 2. Overview of the cross passage and main tunnel.
Applsci 15 02153 g002
Figure 3. Layout and dimensions of tunnel segment (dimensions in mm).
Figure 3. Layout and dimensions of tunnel segment (dimensions in mm).
Applsci 15 02153 g003
Figure 4. Finite element analysis model.
Figure 4. Finite element analysis model.
Applsci 15 02153 g004
Figure 5. Schematic diagram of cutting side inner steel plate.
Figure 5. Schematic diagram of cutting side inner steel plate.
Applsci 15 02153 g005
Figure 6. Flat-face cutterhead for opening of the cross passage portal.
Figure 6. Flat-face cutterhead for opening of the cross passage portal.
Applsci 15 02153 g006
Figure 7. Schematic diagram of the starting stage.
Figure 7. Schematic diagram of the starting stage.
Applsci 15 02153 g007
Figure 8. Schematic of external loading on main tunnel segments.
Figure 8. Schematic of external loading on main tunnel segments.
Applsci 15 02153 g008
Figure 9. Schematic diagram of tunnel portal in different stages.
Figure 9. Schematic diagram of tunnel portal in different stages.
Applsci 15 02153 g009
Figure 10. Schematic diagram of fully cut and semi-cut segment ring.
Figure 10. Schematic diagram of fully cut and semi-cut segment ring.
Applsci 15 02153 g010
Figure 11. Horizontal displacement diagram of fully cut ring segment with flat-face cutter head.
Figure 11. Horizontal displacement diagram of fully cut ring segment with flat-face cutter head.
Applsci 15 02153 g011
Figure 12. Vertical displacement diagram of fully cut ring segment with flat-face cutter head.
Figure 12. Vertical displacement diagram of fully cut ring segment with flat-face cutter head.
Applsci 15 02153 g012
Figure 13. Horizontal displacement diagram of semi-cut ring segment with the flat cutter head.
Figure 13. Horizontal displacement diagram of semi-cut ring segment with the flat cutter head.
Applsci 15 02153 g013
Figure 14. Vertical displacement diagram of semi-cutg ring segment with the flat cutter head.
Figure 14. Vertical displacement diagram of semi-cutg ring segment with the flat cutter head.
Applsci 15 02153 g014
Figure 15. The displacement of semi-cut rings and fully cut ring in the direction of 180°.
Figure 15. The displacement of semi-cut rings and fully cut ring in the direction of 180°.
Applsci 15 02153 g015
Figure 16. The displacement of fully cut ring and semi-cut ring in the 90° direction.
Figure 16. The displacement of fully cut ring and semi-cut ring in the 90° direction.
Applsci 15 02153 g016
Figure 17. The displacement of fully cut ring and semi-cut ring in the direction of 270°.
Figure 17. The displacement of fully cut ring and semi-cut ring in the direction of 270°.
Applsci 15 02153 g017
Figure 18. Schematic diagram of measuring points.
Figure 18. Schematic diagram of measuring points.
Applsci 15 02153 g018
Figure 19. Displacement variation in measuring point in X direction.
Figure 19. Displacement variation in measuring point in X direction.
Applsci 15 02153 g019
Figure 20. Displacement variation in measuring points in the Y direction.
Figure 20. Displacement variation in measuring points in the Y direction.
Applsci 15 02153 g020
Figure 21. Displacement variation at the top of the tunnel in the Y direction.
Figure 21. Displacement variation at the top of the tunnel in the Y direction.
Applsci 15 02153 g021
Figure 22. Displacement variation at the bottom of the tunnel in the Y direction.
Figure 22. Displacement variation at the bottom of the tunnel in the Y direction.
Applsci 15 02153 g022
Figure 23. The displacement variation in the front of the main tunnel in the x direction.
Figure 23. The displacement variation in the front of the main tunnel in the x direction.
Applsci 15 02153 g023
Figure 24. The displacement variation in the back of the main tunnel in the x direction.
Figure 24. The displacement variation in the back of the main tunnel in the x direction.
Applsci 15 02153 g024
Figure 25. Side view of segment ring angle selection.
Figure 25. Side view of segment ring angle selection.
Applsci 15 02153 g025
Figure 26. Axial force distribution of fully cut ring at different construction stages.
Figure 26. Axial force distribution of fully cut ring at different construction stages.
Applsci 15 02153 g026
Figure 27. Axial force distribution of semi-cut ring tube at different construction stages.
Figure 27. Axial force distribution of semi-cut ring tube at different construction stages.
Applsci 15 02153 g027
Figure 28. Bending moment diagram of the fully cut ring at different construction stages (KN·M).
Figure 28. Bending moment diagram of the fully cut ring at different construction stages (KN·M).
Applsci 15 02153 g028
Figure 29. Bending moment diagram of semi-cut ring at different construction stages (KN·M).
Figure 29. Bending moment diagram of semi-cut ring at different construction stages (KN·M).
Applsci 15 02153 g029
Table 1. Structural material parameters1.
Table 1. Structural material parameters1.
Structure NameMaterialModulus of Elasticity (GPa)Density (t/m3)Poisson’s Ratio
Plain segmentC50 concrete34.52.42 0.2
Steel blend special pieceC50 concrete, Q235 steel585.13 0.25
Inner steel plate, boltsQ235 steel2067.85 0.25
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, B.; Li, X.; Liu, S. Numerical Simulation of Mechanical Response of Tunnel Breakage in the Construction of Cross Passages by Mechanical Excavation Method Using Flat-Face Cutterhead. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 2153. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15042153

AMA Style

Li B, Li X, Liu S. Numerical Simulation of Mechanical Response of Tunnel Breakage in the Construction of Cross Passages by Mechanical Excavation Method Using Flat-Face Cutterhead. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(4):2153. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15042153

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Bingyi, Xianghong Li, and Songyu Liu. 2025. "Numerical Simulation of Mechanical Response of Tunnel Breakage in the Construction of Cross Passages by Mechanical Excavation Method Using Flat-Face Cutterhead" Applied Sciences 15, no. 4: 2153. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15042153

APA Style

Li, B., Li, X., & Liu, S. (2025). Numerical Simulation of Mechanical Response of Tunnel Breakage in the Construction of Cross Passages by Mechanical Excavation Method Using Flat-Face Cutterhead. Applied Sciences, 15(4), 2153. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15042153

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop