Next Article in Journal
A Digital Twin of River Experiment Infrastructure Based on a 3D Game Engine and Validation of Water Flow with a Real-Scale Experiment
Previous Article in Journal
The Influence of the Fruit Maceration Method on pH, Vitamin C and Total Phenolic Contents, and Antioxidant Activity of Japanese Quince and Quince Tinctures
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Review

Deep Learning-Based SAR Target Recognition: A Dual-Perspective Survey of Closed Set and Open Set

Automation Department, School of Information Science and Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(23), 12501; https://doi.org/10.3390/app152312501
Submission received: 21 October 2025 / Revised: 15 November 2025 / Accepted: 18 November 2025 / Published: 25 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Computing and Artificial Intelligence)

Abstract

Owing to the all-weather, day-and-night imaging capability of Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR), SAR automatic target recognition (ATR) has long been a central focus in academia and industry. Since 2013, deep learning has become the dominant paradigm for SAR ATR owing to its end-to-end learning capability and robust feature-extraction capacity. To the best of our knowledge, this work provides the first systematic survey of SAR target recognition from dual closed-set and open-set perspectives and identifies four major performance bottlenecks: data scarcity, algorithmic limitations, hardware constraints, and application barriers. To address the first three bottlenecks, an in-depth analysis of closed-set solutions is presented, covering data augmentation, network optimization, and lightweight architectures. For the fourth challenge, a comprehensive analysis of open-set SAR recognition methods is provided. The intrinsic relationship and distinctions between closed-set and open-set recognition are further examined. To tackle the open-set challenge, an enhanced domain-adaptive algorithm for open-set recognition is proposed. Experiments on the OpenSAR and FUSAR datasets demonstrate at least a 3% improvement in open-set accuracy (OSA) over seven recent domain-adaptation algorithms. The rejection rate of unknown targets (RRU) reaches 80.30%, demonstrating a strong ability to distinguish unknown-class targets and offering practical insights for future research. Finally, potential directions for advancing SAR ATR are outlined, providing a comprehensive reference for the continued development of deep-learning-based SAR recognition.
Keywords: synthetic aperture radar; automatic target recognition; deep learning; dataset; electromagnetic scattering characteristics; convolutional neural network; open set; generative adversarial networks synthetic aperture radar; automatic target recognition; deep learning; dataset; electromagnetic scattering characteristics; convolutional neural network; open set; generative adversarial networks

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, Y.; Zhao, H. Deep Learning-Based SAR Target Recognition: A Dual-Perspective Survey of Closed Set and Open Set. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 12501. https://doi.org/10.3390/app152312501

AMA Style

Yang Y, Zhao H. Deep Learning-Based SAR Target Recognition: A Dual-Perspective Survey of Closed Set and Open Set. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(23):12501. https://doi.org/10.3390/app152312501

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Ying, and Haitao Zhao. 2025. "Deep Learning-Based SAR Target Recognition: A Dual-Perspective Survey of Closed Set and Open Set" Applied Sciences 15, no. 23: 12501. https://doi.org/10.3390/app152312501

APA Style

Yang, Y., & Zhao, H. (2025). Deep Learning-Based SAR Target Recognition: A Dual-Perspective Survey of Closed Set and Open Set. Applied Sciences, 15(23), 12501. https://doi.org/10.3390/app152312501

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop