Next Article in Journal
Design and Evaluation of Shared Tennis Service Robots Based on AHP–FCE
Previous Article in Journal
Machine Learning Analytics for Blockchain-Based Financial Markets: A Confidence-Threshold Framework for Cryptocurrency Price Direction Prediction
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Enhanced Reality Exercise System Designed for People with Limited Mobility

1
Electrical and Electronics Engineering Department, Dokuz Eylül University, Tinaztepe Campus, İzmir 35390, Turkey
2
Izmir Vocational School, Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir 35380, Turkey
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(20), 11146; https://doi.org/10.3390/app152011146
Submission received: 13 August 2025 / Revised: 15 September 2025 / Accepted: 10 October 2025 / Published: 17 October 2025

Abstract

Featured Application

With the virtual bicycle movement system we developed, people with mobility limitations will have the opportunity to engage in sports in realistic virtual outdoor environments from the comfort and safety of their own homes.

Abstract

People with limited mobility experience disadvantages when participating in outdoor activities such as cycling, which can lead to negative consequences. This study proposes an indoor physical cycling activity, with the help of technological solutions, for people with limited mobility. The aim is to use enhanced reality (ER) technology, based on virtual reality, to exercise in the person’s own indoor environment. In this system, real track and speed information is received by a 360-degree camera, GPS, and gyroscope sensors and presented to the mechanical system in the electromechanical bike structure with real-time interaction. The pedal force system of the exercise bike is driven using information of the incline, and data from the bike’s speed sensor and head movements are transferred in real time to the track image on the user’s head-up display, creating a realistic experience. With this system, it is possible to maintain an experience close to real cycling through human–computer interaction with hardware and software integration. Thus, using this system, people with limited mobility can improve their quality of life by performing indoor physical activities with an experience close to reality.

1. Introduction

Virtual reality (VR) and enhanced reality (or augmented reality AR) are approaches that emerged after the development of computer systems and personal display screens [1]. With recent advances in miniaturized mobile computing platforms and accurate displays, there has been a strong increase in demand for deeper human–digital interactions beyond traditional flat-panel displays. Augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) headsets are emerging as next-generation interactive displays capable of providing new possibilities in three-dimensional (3D) visual experiences [2]. In the virtual reality approach, the media are synthetic, and the user can perform certain commands in this synthetic world using a joystick or other equipment [3]. Interaction with non-real objects or people can be achieved using spatial localizers and angle determinants. Mechanical force and motion feedback (haptic feedback) can be received from the synthetic world, instead of just observational activities, such as touching and manipulating the object. At the same time, the 360-degree video on AR/VR applications may affect empathy, attitude, and attention to immersive communications [4] in social life.
An enhanced reality or mixed reality (MR) experience combines elements of both AR and VR and involves the interaction of real-world and digital objects. Mixed reality allows one to view virtual items, similar to augmented reality, but these objects also interact with the actual environment. Hence, mixed reality is a more immersive and interactive version of augmented reality [5].
In enhanced reality (ER or AR) applications, real environments or objects are used together with or instead of synthetic images. These can be interacted with, such as by observation or touch, and they contain environments that are completely isolated from the real world. Despite the virtual reality system, interaction with the real world is possible [6]. For example, when looking at a glass, it is evident that it is full and covered with a picture. It is situated next to a real ruin. It is possible to see the exact structure while looking at it, touching a virtual organ using a haptic device, or cutting as if working on a synthetic patient on a real operating table. Improved reality applications require more equipment and software support than virtual reality systems. To look at a real object, you need either VR glasses with a high-resolution camera or a transparent surface, with which a helmet capable of transmitting images is required. The viewer must also consider head movements and body angle and position, and specialized hardware is required for physical feedback.
A newly developed area of VR/AR systems is the application of education or meetings [7] through collaboration, in which users can interact with each other regardless of the distance between them. This option allows users to install appropriate collaboration tools or environments in a virtual environment with appropriate architecture that can replace a traditional physical meeting. However, technical or approach problems may arise when users are far away from each other and need an effective way or tool to collaborate. Appropriate solutions to these problems will increase the performance and acceptance rate of this system [7].
There are also applications in sports, urban life, and tourism and architecture [8]. A sailing application with augmented reality is a paradigm shift. The bicycle simulator’s development and validation are a significant step forward. Virtual bicycle simulation for sustainable traffic in the city is a valuable addition, and the fictionalized virtual reality cycling system is a pioneering innovation. The virtual cycling trainer application with an electromechanical system control [9] and the virtual reality application [10] are two examples of how discomfort in bicycle simulators can be reduced.
Different design applications are also available for operation. These include a unified reality application that uses finger gestures to guide design [11], as well as a unified reality application in applications [8]. The virtual 360-degree tourism application, especially for older people via bicycle [12], is another example of how virtual reality can be used to enhance tourism. Some applications undeniably improve the quality of human life, including social rehabilitation [13], virtual multi-user unified reality application for meetings [7], and investigating social effects on children’s cycling [14]. For people with limited opportunities to be outdoors, using a stationary bicycle indoors is not the only substitute. Instead, a virtual reality- and, more importantly, augmented reality-supported system can be used. When such an application is applied, it can increase efficiency by creating a sense of reality for people [15]. Similarly, training athletes using a virtual reality system allows us to adjust the degree of difficulty and course to achieve significant gains in a constrained environment in the most economical way [16].
Use in the healthcare sector is also important. For example, elderly people require limited movement exercises. Other uses are during physical ailments, medical treatment, or the rehabilitation of the patient at the end of an immobilizing treatment. Virtual augmented reality has been shown to be a powerful tool for shoulder rehabilitation [17], hand rehabilitation [18], wrist rehabilitation [19], virtual mirror therapy at home [20], and balance rehabilitation in Parkinson’s patients [21]. It is also an effective approach for cycling, as a rhythmic exercise suitable for rehabilitation [22].
In the medical field, VR/AR applications have begun to be used in technical and clinical applications regarding virtual therapies. For example, stroke is a leading cause of disability worldwide, affecting men, women, and even children, with a higher rate in the elderly. It causes motor, sensory, and cognitive impairments, as well as a decrease in the ability to withstand exertion. Post-stroke rehabilitation focuses on reducing motor impairment and minimizing physical disability through functional reorganization of the brain, taking over the functions of damaged brain regions in the cerebral cortex areas not affected. Most post-stroke rehabilitation treatments utilize technological advances such as improvements in robotic design, development of tactile interfaces, and the emergence of human–machine interactions in virtual reality. These technologies are being investigated in an effort to develop more effective strategies to reduce the physical disabilities resulting from stroke injury. Virtual reality (VR) technology has emerged as a potential method in the field of rehabilitation with advantages such as a controllable environment, clear feedback, a sense of presence, entertaining treatments, and digital recordings in VR rehabilitation systems [17].
The parameters of immersive VR/AR operations are important when HMDs are used to achieve real environment effects, such as distance accuracy, depth perception [23], the gyro bias of HMDs, latency [24], and the human response time [25].
Virtual reality systems or augmented reality systems have some of the side effects of using head-mounted goggles [26], including headaches, rapid movement of the image, or nausea due to movement, depending on the duration of use [27]. However, these effects may not be considered in the application design and implementation.
Similar interactions with various real objects have been carried out, displaying synthetic images in a real environment [28,29]. Real 360-degree visual walkthroughs of areas have also been conducted, as well as layering synthetic images of old buildings over the real ones. Activities such as overlaying the image and the synthetic but mechanical system feedback have also been performed. Although there are real bicycle simulators, there are very few studies in which all these aspects have been combined. This principal concept is shown below in Figure 1.
In this study, we developed the interaction of applications with real objects or environments using the enhanced reality technique, unlike the virtual reality systems mentioned above. The system planned according to the block diagram requires subcomponents with great detail.
The previous rehabilitation examples were not fully immersive, because they use a mirror [20], a camera [21], or a completely virtual world [22,29]. The effectiveness is based on the method. So, if the aim is rehabilitation, each action is useful. In this study, the main idea is to feel immersed while exercising, because enthusiasm is a motivation for progress in rehabilitation. So, our study firstly aims to develop a realistic environment and equipment.
The virtual reality equipment used in this project allows users to experience a three-dimensional visualization of the real physical space in proportion to their movements. This system consists of several subsystems for indoor exercises with the help of AR. The mechanical system allows users to engage in actual cycling, walking, or driving practices that closely resemble those in the real environment, with the added benefit of electromechanical feedback. The user can adjust the angle and position of the bicycle by performing an activity on a mechanical system using virtual reality goggles that provide visual and head movement feedback. A bicycle can be ridden or driven by head movements and mechanical performance taken from the real environment. The user sees only a certain part of the 360-degree video stream, which is given to each eye separately, allowing them to obtain a three-dimensional feeling and, as these images are renewed according to head movements, it is easier to accept. At this stage, the natural perspective and distance focusing techniques of the human eye are also used. The system block diagram is shown in Figure 2.

2. Materials and Methods

The study requires the mathematical modeling of the mechanical bicycle system and subcomponents such as the pedal forcing system. The analysis must extract the kinematic formulation necessary to transform the image in accordance with the viewpoint. We include the pitch and roll motion of the bicycle platform, with the real slopes of the parkour as the pitch and the bicycle side-to-side motion as the roll. In the initial study, only pitch values were used; then, the pitch and roll operations were completed. Figure 3 shows how to calculate the linear actuator extension depending on the roll angle with a front view.
Here, it is assumed that
a = A 0 A 1 .
Then, we can write
A 0 = A 1 + a ,   and   A 0 = A 2 a .
So, we obtain
A 1 = A 2 + 2 a .
Thus, the angle α can be used to write Equation (4):
t a n α = a b = ( A 0 A 1 ) b .
Then, we have Equations (5) and (6) for A1 and A2, as follows:
A 1 = A 0 b . t a n α ,
A 2 = A 0 b . t a n α + 2 a .
Here, we take a = b . t a n α , where a is the extension value, which is needed to rotate the angle α as the roll. The required linear extensions of each actuator can be solved as Equations (7) and (8):
A 1 = A 0 b . t a n α
A 2 = A 0 + b . t a n α
Figure 4 shows how to calculate the linear actuator extension depending on the pitch angle from a side view.
Here, we assume that c is constant, and the actuators are connected to the base from two sides without any deformations; therefore, the angle β is small. If A is the extension of the actuator rod and small β, we can write Equation (9) as
t a n β = A c
Then, linear actuator extension A can be derived from Equation (10) for both actuators:
A = t a n β . c .
So, for both pitch and roll conditions, the extension of actuator rods can be calculated as follows:
For α > 0 ,
A 1 = t a n β . c b . t a n α ,
A 2 = t a n β . c + b . t a n α .
For α < 0 ,
A 1 = t a n β . c + b . t a n α ,
A 2 = t a n β . c b . t a n α
The mechanical system created according to the concept given in Figure 1 is shown in Figure 5. The system consists of a two-degree-of-freedom motion platform added to the bottom of a standard magnetic force exercise bike, where the sensor and electronic system are revised and made suitable for operation. The added handlebar and brake system ensure that the user obtains the full feeling of using the exercise bike.
The kinematic relations required for the mechanical system are calculated with a geometric approach to determine the angle between the center and front center points. The design was made according to the prediction that the actuators could operate under a total load of 5000N. Because the exercise bike weighs 100 kg, and the person on it weighs 80 kg on average, the factor of safety (FoS) was determined with a ratio of requirement of 2–3 times the above. In the study, the mechanical design of the motion system was tested in a simulation environment, and its compliance with these safety requirements was also analyzed. According to these simulation results, the total load of 1800 N applied to the pivot at the front and rear center points carried by two actuators with a capacity of 5000 N shows that the system can operate with a factor of safety (FoS) = 2.78. The simulation analyses are shown in Figure 6.
The developed system can process speed and slope information using real or virtual 3D images. This platform has ±10-degree angles of pitch and roll axes and 7 mm/s maximum speed features. These features are suitable for people with limited mobility and the elderly. However, they would need to be updated for more active athletes. The mechanical motion system inclination examples are shown in Figure 7.

3. Electronic System

The entire electronic system was designed, and the processor and control card were produced. In addition, as the existing magnetic speed sensor was on the rear disk in the experiments, which did not produce a signal when the pedal movement stopped, a new infrared sensor system was designed and produced on the front disk to obtain a more realistic driving function. Figure 8 shows our electronic system components.
To provide realistic responses for the advanced applications planned in the study, the electronic control system required additional structures not present on the bicycle from Ultima, İstanbul, Türkiye. These include the sensor structure measuring the speed of the front drive disk, the circuit measuring the brake lever on the free handlebar, the sensor and driver module controlling the position of the DC forcing motor, the circuit driving the linear actuators of the motion platform, the processor card providing communication with the external computer system, and the embedded software. All these additional components were designed and implemented to be controlled from a single card. This electronic control card and the system subcomponents are given in Figure 9 below.
During operation, even if the user stops pedaling, the speed information received from the front disk of the exercise bike, which continues to rotate realistically with its current momentum, is combined with the brake lever level, converted to a value between 1 and 20, and transferred to the external computer via USB port or wirelessly via Bluetooth. In this way, the external computer can adjust the playback speed more realistically. In addition, the same wired or wireless communication channel transmits the recorded slope information at the time of video playback to our designed card with embedded control software. This information is also used to drive the mechanical motion system actuators and control the forcing motors. In this way, the pitch and roll angles are applied to the motion platform with the least synchronization delay with the image, and the most effective physical feedback is provided to the user, due to the platform that makes the forcing change in the pedal according to the inclination. In this way, the human brain can accept the reality of the exercise more with the mechanical body movement and 3D visual stimulation, and the desired result can be achieved.
This system is designed to use nine levels of hardness, with 5 being normal, 1 being the lowest or easiest, and 9 being the highest or hardest. Depending on the conditions of the slope during use on the track, if the slope is positive, the user will feel the pedal hardness as higher than level 5, and if the slope is negative, the user will feel the pedal hardness as lower than level 5. Theoretically, the system can apply more than 9 levels of hardness (in practice, 16), but as it is assumed that users are generally elderly or have mobility issues, the hardness level is limited to a maximum of 9.

4. Real Parkour Data Acquisition

The enhanced reality application aims to produce a more realistic sense of reality in the user using real track data with motion feedback. Real track data mainly consist of 360-degree video recordings of a real environment that can be viewed in a bicycle-like manner in terms of the head height and viewing angle. For this purpose, a bicycle driver used a 360-degree head-mounted camera, and tracks were recorded with this view. Four sample parkour videos and slope data were produced in this study. For example, the track given below was recorded on a small slope parkour around buildings at Dokuz Eylül University, Tınaztepe Campus, Buca, İzmir region. Sample track recordings are shown below in Figure 10 and Figure 11. The records contain gyroscope and embedded GPS data. In this way, real pitch and roll movements can be repeated by the motion platform on the system while using processed slope data.
The data collected and given above have a resolution of 3840 × 1920, a frame rate of 50 fps, a bit rate of 70 Mbs, and a length of 146 s. During the application, only the fullHD (1920 × 1080) part of the video data is shown to the user to achieve realistic human eye vision. When the user looks around, the related part of the video data is applied to the head-mounted display of a VR headset using the developed software.

5. Software

Two main software components were used this phase. The first was embedded software that collects the pedal disc speed and magnetic strain system motor position information of the exercise bike, transmits the speed information to the computer software, and controls the motion platform driver, which runs on the ESP32 processor Shanghai, China. The flow diagram of this system is shown in Algorithm 1. This software is written in C language and uploaded to the chip using an Arduino IDE 1.8.16 from Interaction Design Institute Ivrea, Ivrea, Italy. This code works synchronously with the hardware input interrupt that reads the front disc speed sensor in a timer interrupt cycle and can transfer the information obtained to the computer via USB or wireless Bluetooth. This software also controls the motion platform drive by processing the recorded pitch and roll information along with the video frame sent by the computer software.
The second part of the software process was developing a viewport in the Unity Game Engine San Francisco, CA, USA for the Meta Oculus Quest2 headset Menlo Park, CA, USA. In this application, the aim was to show the user only a viewport of the 360-degree parkour video coated on a spherical virtual dome. In this strategy, only a limited part of the raw video is seen by the user, wherever the user looks.
For this method, the size of the sphere and the viewport angles are determined by basic human eye perception [28,29]. So, the 3–20 m radius of the sphere is seen as suitable for a 2.5 mm pupil for the human eye for the best results. This study chooses a 5 m radius of the sphere and 60 degrees of viewport per eye as the viewport model. This software was developed by writing the three-dimensional environment structure developed in the Unity game engine with the C# language on the Visual Studio Visual Studio 2022 (version 17.x) platform. The concept drawing of the Unity software is shown in Algorithm 2.
Algorithm 1 ESP32Embedded code flow.
1:  procedure SYSTEM_START
2:   Initialize Serial Communication (9600)
3:   Configure Input/Output Pins
4:   Attach Encoder Interrupt
5:   Setup Timer
6:   Display OLED Startup Message
7:  end procedure
8:  procedure MAINLOOP
9:    if Timer Triggered:  Read interrupt count and time
10:  Update OLED Display
11:  Read and Filter Potentiometer Value
12:  Calculate Level
13:  if level > level_threshold: Move Motor Up
14:    else if level < level_threshold: Move Motor Down
15:    else: Stop Motor
16:  Read Encoder and Map Values
17:  Read Sensor States (Stop, Gyro)
18:  Send Data to Serial
19:  Delay (10ms)
20:   end procedure
21: procedure ENCODER_ISR
22:  if Time Elapsed ≥ 2ms: Increment Encoder; Update Last Time
23: end procedure
24: procedure TIMER_ISR
25:  Update Encoder Value
26:  Increment Interrupt Counter
27:  Save Last Interrupt Time
28:  Send Semaphore
29:  Reset Encoder Value
30: end procedure
31: procedure SERIAL_EVENT
32:  Read Serial Data; Extract First Character
33:  if “B”: Extract Level Value; Update OLED if Enabled
34:  Clear Serial Buffer
35: end procedure
Algorithm 2 Unity Game Engine code flow.
1:  procedure SYSTEM_START
2:   Initialize Serial Communication (9600)
3:   Configure Input/Output Pins
4:   Attach Encoder Interrupt
5:   Setup Timer
6:   Display OLED Startup Message
7:  end procedure
8:  procedure MAINLOOP
9:     if Timer Triggered: Read interrupt count and time
10:   Update OLED Display
11:   Read and Filter Potentiometer Value
12:   Calculate Level
13:   if level > level_threshold: Move Motor Up
14:    else if level < level_threshold: Move Motor Down
15:    else: Stop Motor
16:  Read Encoder and Map Values
17:  Read Sensor States (Stop, Gyro)
18:  Send Data to Serial
19:  Delay (10ms)
20:   end procedure
21: procedure ENCODER_ISR
22:  if Time Elapsed ≥ 2ms: Increment Encoder; Update Last Time
23: end procedure
24: procedure TIMER_ISR
25:  Update Encoder Value
26:  Increment Interrupt Counter
27:  Save Last Interrupt Time
28:  Send Semaphore
29:  Reset Encoder Value
30: end procedure
31: procedure SERIAL_EVENT
32:  Read Serial Data; Extract First Character
33:  if “B”: Extract Level Value; Update OLED if Enabled
34:  Clear Serial Buffer
35: end procedure

6. Results

In this study, the entire system was designed to be controlled by an operator and can be used independently. The bicycle and motion system were built together with the electronic design and are controlled by it. All electronics are connected to the operator’s computer via USB port or wireless Bluetooth. The Meta Oculus Quest II Headset receives a stereo image via computer with Airlink, as shown in Figure 12.
In the software, the track slope information is transferred to the designed electronic system via serial port or Bluetooth by the computer connected to the system and containing the main control interface. The pedal rotation speed information and brake information collected from the mechanical system are transferred to the main control program interface via the same serial port and used to control the playback speed. At the same time, the video is transferred to the user by covering it on a spherical surface that provides the highest visual perception to the user according to the head movements. In addition, a software change was made to control the motion platform angle control circuit operating from a second USB port in accordance with the embedded electronic circuit change.
The software plays 360-degree videos mainly according to the head movements within the surface of a virtual sphere. Depending on the tilt information related to the recorded video frame, the motion platform moves, and depending on the speed information from the bicycle disk sensor, the 360-degree video player is controlled by the Unity engine. Only the part of the video that fits the human’s perspective is reflected on each eye. The output image of the video played by the Unity game engine and Visual Studio program controlled by the project control computer are shown in Figure 12. Here, the control menu on the PC, the video image flowing in the control window, and the stereo image of the VR headset are displayed, as shown in Figure 13.

7. Conclusions

Using our AR bicycle movement system, people with mobility limitations have the opportunity to participate in sport using real outdoor images in an indoor environment. The hardware consists of an electromechanical system and electronic control that provide physical feedback and form the basis for the related enhanced reality studies. This system was integrated with the two-degree-of-freedom motion platform of a safe exercise bike for the user, which was electronically and mechanically modified, and its electronic circuits were redesigned and are ready for use. In terms of safety, the final implementation can be connected to an external application computer in a wired or wireless manner in order for an expert operator to control the operation. In addition, the software can be used as a virtual or enhanced reality system infrastructure, with virtual reality equipment.
With this system, the user has the feeling of a real track with mechanical movement compatible with the track slope movements on the head-mounted display (HMD). The sense of reality (immersion) can be increased via the brain’s accepting the visual and physical stimuli. This work continues to be developed by our team.
One of the key points of the design is suitable parkour recordings. In this demo study, low slope tracks were chosen, because we focused on individuals with mobility issues. However, many demanding parkour or track alternatives are operable for healthy persons or athletes with appropriate mechanical system options.
This system is being developed for real-life applications aimed at people with limited mobility, such as the elderly, following ethical regulations and procedures. After these steps are completed, the system can be applied.
This design can be easily transformed into any other exercise system with the help of other options such as a treadmill or flight tool. Only appropriate video recording and mechanical feedback are required for that transformation. Hence, this option may be applied to further demands.
Our system aims first at a complete immersion with real-life media and equipment with realistic mechanical feedback. Similar examples of rehabilitation systems generally target rehabilitation, with realism as a secondary issue. At the same time, some applications in sports have realistic mechanical feedback, but their aim is performance rather than immersion. So, our system may be used for indoor exercise or rehabilitation applications for elderly people, with the choice of appropriately slow bicycle equipment with safe motion limits.
To provide a sense of reality in applications of this system, several points must be considered. The required external computer structure must have computational and image processing capabilities, the wireless or wired connection speed must be sufficiently high, and the output resolution of the rendering program must be high. Without these conditions, it may not be possible to provide realistic movement acceptance by the brain. In this context, an output resolution that can provide 4K images and a refresh rate of at least 50–60 Hz are both recommended.
Some people may experience slight dizziness using this system, for several reasons. The first may be the person themselves, as some people may be more sensitive. One should test the system and check the conditions. Second, the video resolution could be improved to achieve environmental realism. The video recording conditions were via a bicycle helmet, and the bicycle needs to be tilted during the turns. This situation may cause discomfort for the user. Thirdly, the field of view considered normal varies for all people and is not universal. Further studies for such improvements and generalization are planned at the next stage.

8. Patents

A patent application has been filed for this work. The process is ongoing.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.Ö. and T.O.; methodology, A.Ö., T.O. and T.A.; software, T.A. and A.Ö.; validation, A.Ö. and T.A.; formal analysis, A.Ö. and T.O.; investigation, A.Ö., T.A. and T.O.; resources, A.Ö.; data curation, A.Ö.; writing—original draft preparation, A.Ö., T.A. and T.O.; writing—review and editing, A.Ö., T.A. and T.O.; visualization, A.Ö.; supervision, A.Ö. and T.O.; project administration, A.Ö.; funding acquisition, A.Ö. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Dokuz Eylül University as a Scientific Research Project, grant number FBA-2023-3112.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study did not require ethical approval since it was an initial design study, and no test with a mobility-limited person was planned or implemented.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The 360-degree video and pitch roll angle data can be requested from the authors.

Acknowledgments

In this study, the authors thank Ersoy Solakoğlu for helping with mechanical design and manufacturing process and Ziya M. Balun for assistance in all stages of the project.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Taçgın, Z. Virtual and Augmented Reality; Cambridge Scholars Publishing: Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, 2020; p. 291. [Google Scholar]
  2. Xiong, J.; Hsiang, E.-L.; He, Z.; Zhan, T.; Wu, S.-T. Augmented reality and virtual reality displays: Emerging technologies and future perspectives. Light Sci. Appl. 2021, 10, 216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ying, L.; Jiong, Z.; Wei, S.; Jingchun, W.; Xiaopeng, G. VREX: Virtual reality education expansion could help to improve the class experience (VREX platform and community for VR based education). In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Indianapolis, IN, USA, 18–21 October 2017; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  4. Orduna, M.; Pérez, P.; Gutiérrez, J.; García, N. Methodology to Assess Quality, Presence, Empathy, Attitude, and Attention in 360-Degree Videos for Immersive Communications. IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput. 2023, 14, 2375–2388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Paul, M.; Haruo, T.; Akira, U.; Fumio, K. Augmented reality: A class of displays on the reality-virtuality continuum. In Proceedings of the SPIE Conference, Oakland, CA, USA, 19 June 1995; pp. 282–292. [Google Scholar]
  6. Lee, K. Augmented Reality in Education and Training. TechTrends 2012, 56, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ishigaki, S.A.K.; Ismail, A.W.; Kamruldzaman, M.Q. MR-MEET: Mixed Reality Collaborative Interface for HMD and Handheld Users. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE Global Conference on Computing, Power and Communication Technologies (GlobConPT), New Delhi, India, 23–25 September 2022; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ergün, O.; Akın, Ş.; Dino, İ.G.; Surer, E. Architectural Design in Virtual Reality and Mixed Reality Environments: A Comparative Analysis. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR), Osaka, Japan, 23–27 March 2019; pp. 914–915. [Google Scholar]
  9. Leblanc, M.A.; Sicard, P. EMR and inversion-based control of a virtual reality bicycle trainer. In Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference, Lille, France, 1–3 September 2010; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  10. Matviienko, A.; Müller, F.; Zickler, M.; Gasche, L.A.; Abels, J.; Steinert, T.; Mühlhäuser, M. Reducing Virtual Reality Sickness for Cyclists in VR Bicycle Simulators. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New Orleans, LA, USA, 29 April–5 May 2022; p. 187. [Google Scholar]
  11. Nor’a, M.N.A.; Fadzli, F.E.; Ismail, A.W.; Vicubelab, Z.S.O.; Aladin, M.Y.F.; Hanif, W.A.A.W. Fingertips Interaction Method in Handheld Augmented Reality for 3D Manipulation. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 5th International Conference on Computing Communication and Automation (ICCCA), Greater Noida, India, 30–31 October 2020; pp. 161–166. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ortet, C.P.; Veloso, A.I.; Vale Costa, L. Cycling Through 360° Virtual Reality Tourism for Senior Citizens: Empirical Analysis of an Assistive Technology. Sensors 2022, 22, 6169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Morales, C.C. The impact of augmented reality in society. Rehabilitation processes. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE Thirty Fifth Central American and Panama Convention (CONCAPAN XXXV), Piscataway, NJ, USA, 11–13 November 2015; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  14. Babu, S.; Grechkin, T.; Chihak, B.; Ziemer, C.; Kearney, J.; Cremer, J.; Plumert, J. A Virtual Peer for Investigating Social Influences on Children’s Bicycling. In Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE Virtual Reality Conference, Lafayette, LA, USA, 14–18 March 2009; pp. 91–98. [Google Scholar]
  15. Toshiyuki, H.; Furukawa, T.; Hisao, F.; Ohchi, M.; Yoshiyuki, N. Improvement of reality on input device for Virtual Walk System. In Proceedings of the 2009 ICCAS-SICE, Fukuoka, Japan, 18–21 August 2009; pp. 1100–1104. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ginters, E. Augmented reality use for cycling quality improvement. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2019, 149, 167–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Klein, A.; De Assis, G.A. A Markeless Augmented Reality Tracking for Enhancing the User Interaction During Virtual Rehabilitation. In Proceedings of the 2013 XV Symposium on Virtual and Augmented Reality, Online, 28–31 May 2013; pp. 117–124. [Google Scholar]
  18. Hsian-shen, W.; Chaoli, H.; Chiu, D.; Tsai, S.N. Using augmented reality gaming system to enhance hand rehabilitation. In Proceedings of the 2010 2nd International Conference on Education Technology and Computer, Shanghai, China, 22–24 June 2010; pp. V3-243–V3-246. [Google Scholar]
  19. Hacıoğlu, A.; Özdemir, Ö.F.; Şahin, A.K.; Akgül, Y.S. Augmented reality based wrist rehabilitation system. In Proceedings of the 2016 24th Signal Processing and Communication Application Conference (SIU), Zonguldak, Turkey, 16–19 May 2016; pp. 1869–1872. [Google Scholar]
  20. Heinrich, C.; Langlotz, T.; Regenbrecht, H. Heading Home—Adapting a Clinical Mixed-Reality Rehabilitation System for Patients’ Home Use. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct), Beijing, China, 10–18 October 2019; pp. 426–430. [Google Scholar]
  21. Wang, Y.W.; Chen, C.H.; Lin, Y.C. Balance Rehabilitation System for Parkinson’s Disease Patients Based on Augmented Reality. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE Eurasia Conference on IOT, Communication and Engineering (ECICE), Yunlin, Taiwan, 23–25 October 2020; pp. 191–194. [Google Scholar]
  22. Maculewicz, J.; Serafin, S.; Kofoed, L.B. A Stationary Bike in Virtual Reality—Rhythmic Exercise and Rehabilitation. 2015. Available online: https://www.scitepress.org/papers/2015/53247/53247.pdf (accessed on 24 March 2025).
  23. Jamiy, F.E.; Chandra, A.N.R.; Marsh, R. Distance Accuracy of Real Environments in Virtual Reality Head-Mounted Displays. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Electro Information Technology (EIT), Chicago, IL, USA, 31 July–1 August 2020; pp. 281–287. [Google Scholar]
  24. Azuma, R.; Neely, H.; Daily, M.; Leonard, J. Performance analysis of an outdoor augmented reality tracking system that relies upon a few mobile beacons. In Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, Santa Barbara, CA, USA, 22–25 October 2006; pp. 101–104. [Google Scholar]
  25. Arif, S.M.U.; Carli, M.; Battisti, F. A study on human reaction time in a mixed reality environment. In Proceedings of the 2021 International Symposium on Signals, Circuits and Systems (ISSCS), Iasi, Romania, 15–16 July 2021; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  26. Chirico, A.; Avellone, M.; Palombi, T.; Alivernini, F.; Alessandri, G.; Filosa, L.; Pistella, J.; Baiocco, R.; Lucidi, F. Exploring the Psychological Nexus of Virtual and Augmented Reality on Physical Activity in Older Adults: A Rapid Review. Behav. Sci. 2024, 14, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Elwardy, M.; Zepernick, H.J.; Hu, Y.; Chu, T.M.C.; Sundstedt, V. Evaluation of Simulator Sickness for 360° Videos on an HMD Subject to Participants’ Experience with Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW), Atlanta, GA, USA, 22–26 March 2020; pp. 477–484. [Google Scholar]
  28. Liu, J.; Shi, P.; Yu, H. Design of Lumbar Rehabilitation Training System Based on Virtual Reality. Electronics 2024, 13, 1850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Palmieri, J.L.; Deutsch, J.E. The Effects of Competition on Exercise Intensity and the User Experience of Exercise During Virtual Reality Bicycling for Young Adults. Sensors 2024, 24, 6873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The concept of the 3D world viewport.
Figure 1. The concept of the 3D world viewport.
Applsci 15 11146 g001
Figure 2. System block diagram.
Figure 2. System block diagram.
Applsci 15 11146 g002
Figure 3. Linear actuator extension depending on the roll angle with a front view.
Figure 3. Linear actuator extension depending on the roll angle with a front view.
Applsci 15 11146 g003
Figure 4. Linear actuator extension depending on the pitch angle with a side view.
Figure 4. Linear actuator extension depending on the pitch angle with a side view.
Applsci 15 11146 g004
Figure 5. Mechanical movement system full view.
Figure 5. Mechanical movement system full view.
Applsci 15 11146 g005
Figure 6. Mechanical motion platform simulation and analysis on an 1800 N load.
Figure 6. Mechanical motion platform simulation and analysis on an 1800 N load.
Applsci 15 11146 g006
Figure 7. Mechanical motion platform in action: (a) roll and (b) pitch motion.
Figure 7. Mechanical motion platform in action: (a) roll and (b) pitch motion.
Applsci 15 11146 g007
Figure 8. Electronic system and component relations.
Figure 8. Electronic system and component relations.
Applsci 15 11146 g008
Figure 9. Electronic board and application view of the signal sources on the front drive disc.
Figure 9. Electronic board and application view of the signal sources on the front drive disc.
Applsci 15 11146 g009
Figure 10. Example parkour details, including a map, elevation profile, and calculated slope.
Figure 10. Example parkour details, including a map, elevation profile, and calculated slope.
Applsci 15 11146 g010
Figure 11. Example parkour 360-degree raw video data as discrete frames.
Figure 11. Example parkour 360-degree raw video data as discrete frames.
Applsci 15 11146 g011
Figure 12. Actual application of the complete system.
Figure 12. Actual application of the complete system.
Applsci 15 11146 g012
Figure 13. Operator screen on the side of the admin computer for different head directions. The user can see only the video part and not the on-screen diagnostics.
Figure 13. Operator screen on the side of the admin computer for different head directions. The user can see only the video part and not the on-screen diagnostics.
Applsci 15 11146 g013
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Özkurt, A.; Olcay, T.; Akkan, T. Enhanced Reality Exercise System Designed for People with Limited Mobility. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 11146. https://doi.org/10.3390/app152011146

AMA Style

Özkurt A, Olcay T, Akkan T. Enhanced Reality Exercise System Designed for People with Limited Mobility. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(20):11146. https://doi.org/10.3390/app152011146

Chicago/Turabian Style

Özkurt, Ahmet, Tolga Olcay, and Taner Akkan. 2025. "Enhanced Reality Exercise System Designed for People with Limited Mobility" Applied Sciences 15, no. 20: 11146. https://doi.org/10.3390/app152011146

APA Style

Özkurt, A., Olcay, T., & Akkan, T. (2025). Enhanced Reality Exercise System Designed for People with Limited Mobility. Applied Sciences, 15(20), 11146. https://doi.org/10.3390/app152011146

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop