Next Article in Journal
Cyber Representation in Experimental Architectural Restoration: Integrating HBIM, As-Designed BIM, and VR in a Multilevel and Multitemporal Immersive Ecosystem
Previous Article in Journal
Boosting Adversarial Transferability Through Adversarial Attack Enhancer
Previous Article in Special Issue
An Exploratory Review of Microplastic Pollution, Associated Microbiomes and Pathogens in Water
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Advanced Spectroscopic and Thermoanalytical Quantification of LLDPE in Mealworm Frass: A Multitechnique Approach

by
Encarnación Martínez-Sabater
1,
Rosa Peñalver
2,
Margarita Ros
3,
José A. Pascual
3,
Raul Moral
1 and
Frutos C. Marhuenda-Egea
4,*
1
GIAAMA Research Group, Centro de Investigación e Innovación Agroalimentaria y Agroambiental (CIAGRO-UMH), Agrochemistry and Environment Department, Miguel Hernández University, 03312 Orihuela, Alicante, Spain
2
Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Regional Campus of International Excellence “Campus Mare Nostrum”, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Murcia, Spain
3
Department of Soil and Water Conservation and Organic Waste Management, Centro de Edafología y Biología Aplicada del Segura, CEBAS-CSIC, P.O. Box 4195, 30080 Murcia, Murcia, Spain
4
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and Agricultural Chemistry and Edafology, University of Alicante, Carretera San Vicente del Raspeig s/n, 03690 Alicante, Alicante, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(18), 10244; https://doi.org/10.3390/app151810244
Submission received: 21 August 2025 / Revised: 14 September 2025 / Accepted: 18 September 2025 / Published: 20 September 2025

Abstract

Featured Application

This analytical framework enables accurate quantification of polyethylene microplastics in insect-derived frass and can be applied to assess the biodegradation potential of insects fed on plastic-containing diets. This approach may support the development of bio-based strategies for plastic waste valorization and environmental monitoring.

Abstract

Plastic pollution from polyethylene-based materials is a critical environmental concern due to their high persistence. Here, we report the first proof-of-concept application of a multitechnique analytical framework for quantifying linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE) in Tenebrio molitor frass. Artificially enriched frass–LLDPE mixtures were analyzed using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), TGA coupled with Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) and Mass Spectrometry (MS), TGA under inert atmosphere, and solid-state 13C nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy with Cross-Polarization and Magic Angle Spinning (CP-MAS NMR) 13C CP-MAS NMR combined with interval Partial Least Squares (iPLS) modeling. Thermal methods provided insight into decomposition pathways but showed reduced specificity at <1% w/w due to matrix interference. CP-MAS NMR offered matrix-independent quantification, with characteristic signals in the 10–45 ppm region and a calculated LOD and LOQ of 0.173% and 0.525% w/w, respectively. The LOQ lies within the reported ingestion range for T. molitor (0.8–3.2% w/w in frass), confirming biological relevance. This validated workflow establishes CP-MAS NMR as the most robust tool for quantifying polyethylene residues in complex matrices and provides a foundation for in vivo biodegradation studies and environmental monitoring.

1. Introduction

The persistence of plastic waste, particularly polyethylene-based polymers, has become one of the most pressing environmental challenges of the 21st century. Among these, linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE) is widely used in flexible packaging, agricultural films, and consumer products due to its mechanical properties and chemical resistance. However, this same resistance renders it highly recalcitrant in natural environments, with degradation timelines that span centuries [1].
Conventional disposal strategies—including landfilling, incineration, and mechanical recycling—have proven insufficient to address the escalating accumulation of polyethylene-based plastics. Consequently, alternative biodegradation pathways are under active investigation. In recent years, particular interest has focused on the capacity of invertebrates to ingest and potentially transform synthetic polymers, a phenomenon initially observed in larvae of Tenebrio molitor (mealworms) and other insects [2,3].
Several studies have reported that mealworms can fragment and partially mineralize polystyrene (PS) and low-density polyethylene (LDPE), likely through the combined action of gut microbiota and endogenous enzymatic activity [2,3]. However, the biodegradation of LLDPE, which exhibits a higher degree of crystallinity and thermal stability than LDPE, remains far less understood and it has been scarcely studied in the context of insect frass. In particular, the extent to which ingested LLDPE is chemically transformed, metabolized, or excreted intact is still under debate. Addressing this gap, the present study applies solid-state 13C CP-MAS NMR combined with iPLS chemometrics for the quantitative detection of LLDPE residues in T. molitor frass.
Frass—the excrement produced by insects—offers a unique matrix to assess the fate of ingested plastics. It may contain unaltered polymer residues, degradation byproducts, or even biotransformed compounds, as demonstrated in insect-mediated plastic degradation studies [2,3]. Therefore, accurately quantifying the amount of residual plastic in frass is essential for evaluating the efficacy of insect-mediated plastic degradation. This requires highly sensitive and selective analytical techniques capable of resolving polymer signals within a complex organic background.
Several analytical strategies have been proposed for the detection of plastics in biological and environmental matrices. Pyrolysis–GC/MS provides high chemical specificity but often requires laborious sample preparation and is strongly affected by organic matrix components [4,5,6]. However, it is destructive, requires labor-intensive sample preparation, and suffers from interference caused by organic-rich substrates such as frass. Spectroscopic approaches such as FTIR and Raman are commonly used, yet their performance is limited when dealing with complex, heterogeneous substrates like insect frass, particularly for polyethylene [2,3]. In contrast, solid-state 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy with cross-polarization and magic angle spinning (13C CP-MAS NMR) enables direct detection of aliphatic carbons, offering matrix-independent, non-destructive detection with high sensitivity [7,8].
13C CP-MAS NMR has recently emerged as a promising method for analyzing synthetic polymers in environmental samples [9]. It allows for non-destructive, label-free detection of characteristic aliphatic carbon signals and can differentiate between synthetic and biogenic carbon structures. When combined with chemometric modeling, such as interval partial least squares (iPLS), this technique enables precise quantification of plastic residues even at trace levels [10,11].
In this study, we present a multitechnique analytical strategy to detect and quantify LLDPE in frass samples from T. molitor. Artificial mixtures of frass and cryogenically milled LLDPE were analyzed using thermal analysis (under both oxidizing and inert atmospheres), coupled FTIR and mass spectrometry, and solid-state CP-MAS 13C NMR. iPLS-based chemometric models were applied to improve sensitivity and predictive accuracy. CP-MAS NMR successfully detected polyethylene at the lowest concentration tested (0.096% w/w). However, this value corresponds to the minimum experimental level, whereas the calculated LOD and LOQ were 0.173% and 0.525% w/w, respectively, confirming that the method is applicable to biologically relevant ingestion ranges (0.8–3.2% w/w in frass [3,12]. Our goal is to establish a robust analytical framework for future in vivo experiments investigating the fate of plastic polymers in insect digestion systems and to evaluate the biochemical impact of plastic ingestion in T. molitor. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study applying solid-state 13C CP-MAS NMR combined with iPLS chemometric modeling to quantify LLDPE residues in Tenebrio molitor frass.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Tenebrio Culture and Sample Preparation

We used the T. molitor frass obtained in the trial carried out in another parallel study [13]. In that study, a control culture of T. molitor was grown and fed only wheat bran. The frass obtained was stored refrigerated and then used in the present study.
Linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE) standard was purchased from Sigma–Aldrich (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). The LLDPE standard was mechanically milled using a Cryogenic Mixer Mill CryoMill (Retsch, Haan, Germany) to obtain cryo-milled LLDPE dust of 200 μm. To prepare calibration standards, frass obtained from larvae fed with a conventional wheat-bran diet was homogenized and subsequently spiked with known amounts of LLDPE powder to yield blends ranging from 0.096 to 10.41% w/w (0.096%, 0.51%, 1.44%, 3.12%, 6.97% and 10.41% w/w). These artificially enriched frass–LLDPE samples were used to ensure controlled conditions for sensitivity testing and chemometric model building and served as calibration standards; however, the analytical workflow can be directly transferable to frass from larvae fed with polyethylene. Mixtures were homogenized manually to simulate expected compositions in future feeding experiments.

2.2. Thermal Analysis Coupled with FTIR and MS Under Oxidant Atmosphere and Thermal Analysis Under Inert Atmosphere

Thermal analysis under oxidizing conditions was conducted using a METTLER TOLEDO (TGA/SDTA851e/LF/1600) and PFEIFFER VACUUM (THERMOSTAR GSD301T)-coupled TG-FTIR-MS system. A STA 449 F5 Jupiter thermobalance (NETZSCH, Gerätebau GmbH, Germany was used in combination with a quadrupole mass spectrometer (Aeolos QMS 403 Quadro, NETZSCH -Gerätebau GmbH, Germany) and an FTIR spectrometer (Invenio, Bruker) (Bruker, Rheinstetten, Germany) equipped with a TGA-IR gas cell.
Approximately 5 mg of each sample was placed in an open Al2O3 crucible and heated from 25 °C to 700 °C at a constant rate of 10 °C/min under a dynamic gas mixture (20% O2/80% N2) flowing at 100 mL/min. The system was calibrated automatically using standard reference materials. The evolved gases were analyzed simultaneously via FTIR and MS.
Thermal degradation under inert conditions was performed using a TGA/SDTA851e thermobalance (Mettler Toledo, Columbus, OH, USA) coupled to a Thermostar GSD301T quadrupole mass spectrometer (Pfeiffer Vacuum, Nashua, NH, USA). Approximately 5 mg of sample was placed in an Al2O3 pan and heated from 25 °C to 700 °C at 10 °C/min under a continuous flow of high-purity nitrogen (100 mL/min). The instrument was calibrated with certified standards to ensure accurate temperature and mass measurements.

2.3. Solid-State 13C NMR

Cross-Polarization Magic Angle Spinning Carbon-13 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (CPMAS 13C-NMR) experiments were performed on a BRUKER AVANCE DRX500 (Bruker, Rheinstetten, Germany) operating at 125.75 MHz for 13C. Samples were packed into a 4 mm diameter cylindrical zirconia rotor with Kel-F end-caps and spun at 2000 ± 100 Hz. A conventional CP-MAS NMR pulse sequence [14] was used with a 1.0 ms contact time. Between 2000 and 5000 scans were accumulated with a pulse delay of 1.5 s. Line broadening was adjusted to 50 Hz. Spectra were processed using Bruker TopSpin 4.2.0 software (Bruker, Rheinstetten, Germany).

2.4. Chemometric Analysis

The iPLS algorithm, especially useful to wavelength selection, has been used. These algorithms have already been described, and the reader is referred to these papers for more details [15,16,17]. In order to reach the best model with the lowest cross-validated error, the models and preprocessing methods (none, scaling, Multiplicative Scatter Correction (MSC), and Extended Multiplicative Signal Correction (EMSC)) [17,18] were tested. MATLAB version 2024 (MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA) is used for the calculations, and the iToolbox is available at https://ucphchemometrics.com/186-2/algorithms/ (accessed on 17 August 2025).
The Interval Partial Least Squares (iPLS) algorithm was selected as the primary variable selection strategy due to its proven efficacy in handling multivariate spectral datasets—particularly those exhibiting high collinearity, localized informative features, and significant background interference, as is the case in our FTIR, DTG, and CP-MAS NMR data from Tenebrio molitor frass samples. Given that our objective was to quantify low-density polyethylene (LLDPE) content in a complex biological matrix (partially digested oatmeal and insect excretions), it was critical to isolate spectral regions specifically associated with LLDPE’s chemical signature (e.g., aliphatic C–H stretches in FTIR, characteristic thermal degradation peaks in DTG, or methylene resonances in CP-MAS) while suppressing contributions from biogenic components. iPLS achieves this by systematically evaluating the predictive performance of PLS models built on contiguous spectral intervals, enabling both noise reduction and chemically meaningful feature selection [15,16,17]. Unlike filter- or wrapper-based methods that may prioritize statistical performance over interpretability, iPLS preserves the link between selected variables and underlying physicochemical phenomena—a key requirement for environmental and biological applications. Furthermore, its implementation via the iToolbox ensures methodological transparency and reproducibility, aligning with best practices in chemometric modeling of spectroscopic data [16,17].
The full spectral dataset was partitioned into calibration and independent test sets. During model development, segmented cross-validation (“syst123”, Venetian blinds) with 5 folds was applied to avoid overfitting and guide latent variable (LV) selection. For each PLS submodel (global or interval-specific), the optimal number of LVs (up to 10) was determined by minimizing the Root Mean Square Error of Cross-Validation (RMSECV). Model performance was evaluated using RMSECV (internal validation), RMSEP (external prediction on the test set), Pearson correlation coefficient (r), and Bias. The spectral range was divided into 10, 20 or 40 contiguous intervals; those intervals yielding lower RMSECV than the global PLS model were selected for final model construction [15,17]. Visualization and comparison of interval performance were performed using the iplsplot function (iToolbox).
Limits of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) were estimated as 3.3σ/S and 10σ/S, respectively, where σ is the standard deviation of the calibration intercept and S the slope of the calibration curve [19].

3. Results

3.1. Thermal Analysis Coupled with FTIR and MS in Oxidant Atmosphere

Thermal analysis coupled with mass spectrometry (MS) and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) was initially employed to investigate the thermal decomposition profiles of frass samples containing linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE). Samples were artificially prepared by mixing oat bran-based frass from Tenebrio molitor with cryogenically milled LLDPE in proportions ranging from 0.096% to 10% w/w.
The FTIR and MS signals revealed distinct decomposition profiles for frass and LLDPE, particularly at elevated temperatures. LLDPE exhibited thermal degradation at significantly higher temperatures compared to frass, which allowed for differentiation based on specific vibrational bands and ion fragmentation patterns (Figure 1). Notably, strong absorbance bands at 2928 and 2855 cm−1—corresponding to C–H stretching in methyl and methylene groups of aliphatic chains—were observed during the thermal degradation of pure LLDPE and in the 10% LLDPE-frass blend, particularly at 483 °C (Figure 1a–c). These bands were absent in frass-only samples and in mixtures with lower LLDPE content, indicating a detection limit based on FTIR signal intensity. The persistence of these bands in an oxidizing atmosphere suggests incomplete combustion of LLDPE and the release of unoxidized volatile aliphatic fragments.
To assess the potential of FTIR spectra for quantifying LLDPE, interval partial least squares (iPLS) models were constructed using spectra collected at 483 °C. Among 20 tested intervals, a single predictive region yielded a reliable model with good fit and minimal cross-validation error, as shown in Figure 2. This supports the utility of FTIR-based chemometrics for semi-quantitative analysis of LLDPE in complex organic matrices, though sensitivity is limited at lower concentrations.
Mass spectrometry further supported these findings by identifying specific decomposition products in the evolved gas phase (Figure 3). The total ion chromatogram (TIC) showed characteristic ion fragments, and the ion with m/z = 28 provided a strong correlation with LLDPE concentration in the temperature range of 439.7–499.0 °C (R = 0.9785, Figure 4). Similarly, m/z = 44 yielded a higher correlation (R = 0.9864), although the relevant thermal window (607.35–632.0 °C) exceeded the expected decomposition range for LLDPE, suggesting the formation of CO2 from secondary reactions or matrix combustion.
A comprehensive TIC-based iPLS analysis demonstrated the highest correlation (R = 0.9896) when summing ion signals in the m/z 35–45 range (Figure 5). This finding indicates that, despite the complexity of combustion products, specific ion clusters can serve as proxies for LLDPE quantification.
Overall, the combination of thermal analysis, FTIR, and MS proved capable of identifying LLDPE in frass samples with reasonable precision at high concentrations. The iPLS approach allowed for selection of optimal spectral or mass regions most correlated with plastic content. However, at concentrations below 1%, the sensitivity of this method decreased substantially, limiting its utility for detecting trace amounts of LLDPE. Moreover, the requirement for advanced instrumentation and multi-modal coupling presents a barrier to broader application in routine analysis.
Therefore, while the oxidative TGA–FTIR–MS approach offers valuable insights into decomposition behavior and volatile profiles, further analytical refinement or alternative techniques are needed for more accurate quantification of low-level LLDPE residues in biological matrices.

3.2. Thermal Analysis with Inert Atmosphere

Thermal analysis under inert conditions (N2 atmosphere) was carried out to evaluate whether the absence of oxidative reactions enhances the detection and quantification of LLDPE in frass mixtures. Thermogravimetric (TG) and derivative thermogravimetric (DTG) profiles were obtained for mixtures containing 0.096% to 10% w/w LLDPE using a METTLER TOLEDO TGA/SDTA851e system, as described in Materials and Method Section.
DTG curves revealed a distinct peak corresponding to the thermal degradation of LLDPE, with a maximum at 472 °C (Figure 6). This peak was well separated from the broader degradation events associated with the frass matrix (Figure 6a), which occurred at lower temperatures. Application of interval partial least squares (iPLS) regression to the DTG data enabled the identification of the most predictive thermal regions for quantifying LLDPE content. The most informative temperature interval was 433.27–500.54 °C, which corresponds precisely to the onset and peak of LLDPE decomposition (Figure 6c).
The iPLS calibration model based on DTG curves achieved an excellent correlation coefficient (R = 0.9991), with minimal cross-validation error, indicating a highly accurate predictive model. The lowest detectable concentration using this method was approximately 0.096% w/w.
The use of an inert atmosphere provided several analytical advantages. First, it avoided complications arising from exothermic oxidative reactions that may obscure or shift the thermal signature of LLDPE. Second, the high thermal stability of LLDPE in nitrogen allowed for clear discrimination from the more labile organic components of frass. These findings are consistent with prior studies that highlight the utility of inert-atmosphere TGA for polymer quantification in heterogeneous matrices, particularly for polyethylene derivatives [4,5].
In addition, the high sensitivity of the TGA instrument used enabled the generation of well-defined DTG curves, further enhancing model performance. Overall, thermal analysis under inert conditions emerged as a robust and accessible method for quantifying LLDPE in complex biological samples, especially when high concentrations or rapid screening are required.

3.3. Solid-State CP-MAS 13C NMR Spectroscopy

To enhance the sensitivity and selectivity in detecting residual LLDPE within frass matrices, we employed solid-state 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy with cross-polarization and magic angle spinning (CP-MAS). Samples of frass mixed with cryogenically milled LLDPE were prepared in concentrations ranging from 0.96% to 10% w/w. Spectra were acquired for each mixture and compared with those of pure frass and pure LLDPE under identical acquisition parameters.
The CP-MAS 13C NMR spectra (Figure 7) revealed characteristic resonances between 10 and 45 ppm, attributed to aliphatic methylene and methyl groups (–CH2– and –CH3–) that are typical of polyethylene chains. These signals were clearly identifiable even at the lowest LLDPE concentration tested (0.096% w/w), demonstrating the high sensitivity of this technique. However, 0.096% w/w was the lowest tested concentration, and that the true LOD/LOQ values for CP-MAS NMR are 0.173% and 0.525% w/w. The 10–45 ppm region is exclusive to the methylene carbons of polyethylene, providing a selective fingerprint for detection in complex organic matrices. Within this region, HDPE typically exhibits sharp peaks (~30–34 ppm) corresponding to extended linear chains, while LDPE and LLDPE display broader signals due to chemical shift dispersion introduced by short-chain branching (Figure 7a). This selectivity strengthens the reliability of CP-MAS NMR for monitoring polyethylene residues. In contrast, spectra from frass alone were dominated by broader peaks centered near 72 ppm, corresponding to O-alkyl carbons in polysaccharides such as cellulose and hemicellulose, consistent with the insect’s oat bran-based diet.
Chemometric analysis using interval partial least squares (iPLS) confirmed that the most predictive spectral region for LLDPE quantification was the aliphatic zone (10–45 ppm). The optimized model showed excellent linear correlation (R = 0.9972) with low cross-validation error (RMSECV = 0.3426), indicating robust predictive performance across the tested concentration range. The observed calibration performance highlights the technique’s potential not only for qualitative detection but also for precise quantification of microplastic residues in biological matrices.
Importantly, CP-MAS 13C NMR offers additional advantages over thermal methods. It is non-destructive, requires minimal sample preparation, and provides direct molecular-level information without chemical derivatization or pyrolysis. Moreover, the spectral resolution achieved under MAS conditions enables discrimination between polyethylene signals and other organic components of frass, even in complex mixtures.
Beyond quantification, the spectral data also revealed compositional shifts in frass with increasing LLDPE content. Notably, the intensity of carbohydrate-associated signals decreased in parallel with an increase in peaks around 45–55 ppm, which may correspond to proteinaceous or lipid-related carbon environments. These shifts could reflect metabolic changes, altered digestion, or microbial colonization induced by LLDPE ingestion, warranting further biochemical investigation. The 10–45 ppm region is exclusive to the methylene carbons of polyethylene, providing a selective fingerprint for detection in complex organic matrices. Within this region, HDPE typically exhibits sharp peaks (~30–34 ppm) corresponding to extended linear chains, while LDPE and LLDPE display broader signals due to chemical shift dispersion introduced by short-chain branching. This selectivity strengthens the reliability of CP-MAS NMR for monitoring polyethylene residues.

3.4. LOD and LOQ Values

The calculated LOD and LOQ values revealed important differences among the tested analytical techniques [19]. TG-FTIR under oxidizing atmosphere provided the lowest detection threshold (LOD = 0.0168% w/w; LOQ = 0.0510% w/w), followed by TG-MS based on the total ion chromatogram (LOD = 0.0192% w/w; LOQ = 0.0581% w/w) and TG-MS using the characteristic fragment m/z 28 (LOD = 0.0270% w/w; LOQ = 0.0819% w/w). In contrast, TGA performed under inert atmosphere showed markedly higher values (LOD = 0.347% w/w; LOQ = 1.051% w/w), confirming its lower sensitivity for low-level detection. Solid-state 13C CP-MAS NMR yielded intermediate values (LOD = 0.173% w/w; LOQ = 0.525% w/w), but with superior reproducibility and robustness against matrix interferences. Together, these results demonstrate that although thermal decomposition coupled with FTIR or MS can achieve very low instrumental LODs, CP-MAS NMR remains the most reliable technique for quantitative applications in heterogeneous biological matrices such as insect frass.
Taken together, CP-MAS 13C NMR emerges as a powerful analytical tool for detecting and quantifying polyethylene-based microplastics in insect-derived matrices, with clear advantages in resolution, sensitivity, and mechanistic insight compared to thermal or spectroscopic methods alone.

4. Discussion

This study evaluated and compared three complementary analytical techniques—thermal analysis coupled with FTIR and MS under oxidizing atmosphere, thermal analysis under inert atmosphere, and solid-state CP-MAS 13C NMR spectroscopy—to determine their efficacy in detecting and quantifying linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE) in complex biological matrices derived from Tenebrio molitor frass.
The thermal analysis coupled with FTIR and MS offered valuable initial insights into the decomposition pathways of frass–LLDPE mixtures. Specific FTIR bands associated with aliphatic C–H stretching vibrations (2928 and 2855 cm−1), as well as mass spectral fragments (e.g., m/z 28 and 44), enabled partial discrimination between organic and plastic components. However, the method exhibited significant limitations at low LLDPE concentrations (<1%), primarily due to spectral overlap and the influence of matrix background signals. The high complexity and cost of the coupled instrumentation further reduce its practicality for routine quantification, particularly when high-throughput or field-relevant analysis is required. Similar limitations have been reported in other studies using evolved gas analysis for microplastic detection in organic-rich matrices [4,5].
In contrast, thermogravimetric analysis under an inert atmosphere provided more robust and interpretable data. The DTG profiles clearly separated the degradation events of frass from those of LLDPE, with the latter showing a well-defined thermal event at ~472 °C. Application of iPLS modeling enabled accurate calibration, with high correlation (R = 0.9991) and low RMSECV. The reduced interference from oxidative reactions simplified spectral interpretation and improved sensitivity. This method requires less specialized instrumentation than the FTIR–MS setup, making it more accessible. These findings are in line with previous studies highlighting the advantages of inert-atmosphere TGA for polymer analysis in heterogeneous samples [5,6].
Among the techniques tested, solid-state CP-MAS 13C NMR proved to be the most sensitive and informative. Characteristic aliphatic carbon signals (10–45 ppm) associated with polyethylene chains were clearly detected even at the lowest tested concentration (0.096% w/w). It should be noted that this corresponds to the minimum experimental level tested, whereas the calculated LOD and LOQ were 0.173% and 0.525% w/w, respectively. Chemometric modeling based on iPLS provided excellent quantitative performance (R = 0.9972; RMSECV = 0.3426), and the method also revealed compositional shifts in the frass matrix potentially linked to metabolic responses. The LOQ of CP-MAS NMR (0.525% w/w) is well within the range of polyethylene ingestion levels reported for T. molitor (0.8–3.2% w/w in frass). This confirms the applicability of the method to real feeding scenarios, while thermal methods, although more instrumentally sensitive, remain less reliable in complex matrices. Unlike thermal methods, CP-MAS NMR is non-destructive and provides direct molecular-level insight, with minimal sample preparation. Its capability to distinguish between overlapping organic and synthetic signals without chemical pretreatment underscores its analytical strength [9,10,11].
Although TG-FTIR-MS and TGA-MS offer valuable insights into the thermal degradation behavior of polymer–matrix mixtures, their application to complex biological substrates is limited. Insect frass contains high levels of proteins, polysaccharides, and lipids, which generate abundant CO2, H2O, and other volatiles upon heating. These products overlap with polyethylene-derived signals, thereby reducing both sensitivity and specificity. At concentrations below 1% w/w, interference from the matrix obscures polymer-related markers, complicating quantitative analysis. Moreover, signal deconvolution requires extensive calibration, which may underestimate polymer content. By contrast, CP-MAS 13C NMR directly targets the aliphatic carbons of polyethylene, enabling matrix-independent quantification and superior detection limits. Nevertheless, thermal methods remain valuable as complementary tools for characterizing degradation pathways and identifying secondary products.
Overall, while all three techniques provide complementary information, CP-MAS 13C NMR offers the most reliable and precise quantification of LLDPE in frass. Thermal methods remain valuable for rapid screening or high-temperature behavior analysis, but they lack the specificity and resolution required for low-concentration detection. Combining these analytical approaches with chemometric tools like iPLS significantly enhances interpretability and predictive accuracy, particularly in heterogeneous biological systems [15,16,17].
These results lay the foundation for future experiments aimed at evaluating LLDPE degradation in vivo. By establishing baseline quantification techniques, it becomes possible to assess whether ingested plastic is excreted unchanged, partially depolymerized, or metabolically transformed. This analytical framework also opens the door to broader applications in environmental monitoring, biodegradation research, and insect-based plastic valorization.
It is important to note that the enriched frass–LLDPE blends employed in this study do not fully reproduce the complexity of frass derived from larvae fed with polyethylene [4]. Our approach was intended to provide well-defined calibration samples for evaluating analytical sensitivity and robustness. Future studies will focus on applying CP-MAS NMR directly to frass from polyethylene-fed larvae, thereby allowing the quantification of both residual polymer and potential degradation products within a true biodegradation context.
Pyrolysis–GC/MS is widely regarded as the gold standard for microplastic identification, due to its ability to provide polymer-specific fragmentation fingerprints. However, it is destructive, requires extensive sample preparation, and is highly susceptible to interference from organic-rich substrates such as insect frass [4,6]. In contrast, CP-MAS 13C NMR combined with iPLS offers matrix-independent quantification, minimal sample handling, and good sensitivity for polyethylene residues. Although it lacks the molecular specificity of Py-GC/MS, the NMR-based approach is well suited for quantitative monitoring in biodegradation studies, and both methods may be viewed as complementary rather than competing strategies.
The comparative evaluation of detection and quantification limits highlights the complementary nature of thermal and spectroscopic approaches, while also exposing their intrinsic limitations. Thermal decomposition methods coupled with FTIR or MS achieved the lowest instrumental detection thresholds, reflecting their high sensitivity to volatile fragments generated during polymer degradation. However, this apparent sensitivity is strongly compromised by the complexity of the biological matrix: frass contains proteins, polysaccharides, and lipids that release abundant volatiles upon heating, which overlap with the characteristic signals of polyethylene and reduce both specificity and reproducibility. In contrast, TGA under inert atmosphere provided more interpretable thermogravimetric profiles and a clear separation of degradation events, but its practical sensitivity remained limited to relatively high concentrations, reducing its suitability for monitoring biologically realistic ingestion levels. CP-MAS 13C NMR offered intermediate numerical LOD and LOQ values, yet outperformed thermal techniques in terms of robustness, linearity, and independence from matrix interferences. Importantly, NMR directly probes the polyethylene backbone at the molecular level, enabling selective quantification even within a heterogeneous and signal-rich background. These advantages position CP-MAS NMR not only as the most reliable tool for quantitative assessment of polyethylene residues in insect frass, but also as the technique with the highest potential for transferability to real feeding experiments and environmental applications.
The methodological framework presented here has implications beyond proof-of-concept validation. The demonstrated sensitivity and robustness of CP-MAS NMR make it applicable to environmental monitoring of plastic residues in organic-rich matrices such as soils and composts. Moreover, the method provides a reliable basis for in vivo biodegradation studies, where quantifying both residual polymers and degradation products is essential. Finally, these analytical capabilities support the evaluation of insect-mediated strategies for plastic waste valorization, linking laboratory studies with potential biotechnological applications.
A limitation of the present chemometric analysis is the relatively small number of calibration mixtures available (n = 6 concentration levels), which precluded partitioning the dataset into independent calibration and external validation sets without compromising statistical power. In such cases, segmented cross-validation strategies, such as the 5-fold Venetian blinds approach implemented here, are widely recognized as the most appropriate means to obtain an unbiased estimate of predictive error while maximizing use of all available data [15,17]. This approach ensured that each sample was predicted by a model not built on that sample, providing a reliable validation of model performance. Although future studies with larger datasets will benefit from independent external validation, the present workflow adheres to established best practices in chemometric modeling for spectroscopic data.
This work should be regarded as a methodological proof of concept, providing a validated analytical framework for the quantification of LLDPE in insect frass under controlled conditions. The next step will involve applying the workflow to frass obtained from T. molitor fed with polyethylene, enabling a realistic assessment of biodegradation efficiency and polymer transformation pathways.

5. Conclusions

This study demonstrates the utility of a multitechnique analytical approach for detecting and quantifying linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE) in insect-derived frass. Among the techniques evaluated, solid-state CP-MAS 13C NMR provided the most accurate and sensitive quantification of LLDPE, detecting characteristic aliphatic carbon signals even at low concentrations (LOD = 0.173% w/w and LOQ = 0.525% w/w). The chemometric modeling using interval partial least squares (iPLS) further enhanced the precision of the calibration, enabling reliable quantification in complex organic matrices.
Thermal analysis under inert atmosphere also showed strong potential for LLDPE quantification, with DTG profiles offering clear thermal discrimination and robust regression models. In contrast, thermal analysis coupled with FTIR and MS under oxidizing conditions, while informative in characterizing evolved gases, was less sensitive at low plastic concentrations and required complex instrumentation.
Our findings establish CP-MAS NMR combined with iPLS as a sensitive and matrix-independent approach, directly relevant for environmental monitoring, biodegradation research, and the development of sustainable plastic waste valorization strategies.
Taken together, these findings provide a validated analytical framework to quantify synthetic polymer residues in insect frass. This is a critical step toward assessing the biodegradation potential of insects such as Tenebrio molitor when fed plastic-containing diets. Furthermore, the combination of spectroscopy and chemometrics opens avenues for high-resolution analysis of polymer–biomass interactions and supports the development of bio-based microplastic monitoring strategies.
Looking forward, methodological advances such as dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP)-enhanced NMR may further increase sensitivity, enabling detection of trace levels of polyethylene in frass and environmental samples [20]. Likewise, miniaturized TGA systems offer opportunities for rapid, high-throughput analysis with minimal sample requirements [21]. These innovations could extend the applicability of the present framework to broader biodegradation and environmental monitoring contexts.
In summary, this study establishes a proof-of-concept framework; future in vivo feeding experiments will extend its application to real biological samples, bridging methodological development with ecological and biotechnological relevance.

Author Contributions

Funding obtained: F.C.M.-E. Conceived and designed the experiments: E.M.-S., R.P., M.R., J.A.P., R.M. and F.C.M.-E. Performed the analysis and figures: E.M.-S. and F.C.M.-E. Analyzed the data: E.M.-S. and F.C.M.-E. Wrote the manuscript: E.M.-S. and F.C.M.-E. Reviewed the manuscript: E.M.-S., R.P., M.R., J.A.P., R.M. and F.C.M.-E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Emilio Lorenzo and Ion Such (SSTTI of University of Alicante) for technical assistance with NMR and Thermal analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Giaganini, G.; Cifelli, M.; Biagini, D.; Ghimenti, S.; Corti, A.; Castelvetro, V.; Domenici, V.; Lomonaco, T. Multi-analytical approach to characterize the degradation of different types of microplastics: Identification and quantification of released organic compounds. Molecules 2023, 28, 1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Peng, B.-Y.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, X.; Sun, J.; Xu, Y.; Xiao, S.; Chen, J.; Zhou, X.; Zhang, Y. Unveiling the residual plastics and produced toxicity during biodegradation of polyethylene (pe), polystyrene (ps), and polyvinyl chloride (pvc) microplastics by mealworms (larvae of tenebrio molitor). J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 452, 131326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Yang, Y.; Yang, J.; Wu, W.-M.; Zhao, J.; Song, Y.; Gao, L.; Yang, R.; Jiang, L. Biodegradation and mineralization of polystyrene by plastic-eating mealworms: Part 1. chemical and physical characterization and isotopic tests. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 12080–12086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Dümichen, E.; Eisentraut, P.; Bannick, C.G.; Barthel, A.-K.; Senz, R.; Braun, U. Fast identification of microplastics in complex environmental samples by a thermal degradation method. Chemosphere 2017, 174, 572–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. de la Fuente, A.M.; Marhuenda-Egea, F.C.; Ros, M.; Pascual, J.A.; Saez-Tovar, J.A.; Martinez-Sabater, E.; Peñalver, R. Thermogravimetry coupled with mass spectrometry successfully used to quantify polyethylene and polystyrene microplastics in organic amendments. Environ. Res. 2022, 213, 113583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Mostefaoui, O.; Iannuzzi, Z.; Lopez, D.; Mignot, E.; Lipeme-Kouyi, G.; Bayard, R.; Massardier-Nageotte, V.; Mourier, B. Quantitative study of microplastic degradation in urban hydrosystems: Comparing in situ environmentally aged microplastics vs. Artificially aged materials generated via accelerated photo-oxidation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2025, 486, 137087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Mao, J.; Cao, X.; Olk, D.C.; Chu, W.; Schmidt-Rohr, K. Advanced solid-state NMR spectroscopy of natural organic matter. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 2017, 100, 17–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Preston, C.M. Environmental nmr: Solid-state methods. In Emagres; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2014; pp. 29–42. [Google Scholar]
  9. Xochitl, Q.-P.; del Consuelo, H.-B.M.; del Consuelo, M.-S.M.; María, E.-V.R.; Alethia, V.-M. Degradation of plastics in simulated landfill conditions. Polymers 2021, 13, 1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Papini, G.; Petrella, G.; Cicero, D.O.; Boglione, C.; Rakaj, A. Identification and quantification of polystyrene microplastics in marine sediments facing a river mouth through NMR spectroscopy. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2024, 198, 115784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Schmidt, J.; Haave, M.; Wang, W. Overcoming the challenge of quantifying aged microplastic by qNMR spectroscopy. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts 2025, 27, 2821–2834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Brandon, A.M.; Gao, S.-H.; Tian, R.; Ning, D.; Yang, S.-S.; Zhou, J.; Wu, W.-M.; Criddle, C.S. Biodegradation of polyethylene and plastic mixtures in mealworms (larvae of tenebrio molitor) and effects on the gut microbiome. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 6526–6533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Orts, J.M.; Parrado, J.; Pascual, J.A.; Orts, A.; Cuartero, J.; Tejada, M.; Ros, M. Polyurethane foam residue biodegradation through the tenebrio molitor digestive tract: Microbial communities and Enzymatic Activity. Polymers 2023, 15, 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Nelson, P.N.; Baldock, J.A. Estimating the molecular composition of a diverse range of natural organic materials from solid-state 13C NMR and elemental analyses. Biogeochemistry 2005, 72, 1–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kristensen, M.; Savorani, F.; Ravn-Haren, G.; Poulsen, M.; Markowski, J.; Larsen, F.H.; Dragsted, L.O.; Engelsen, S.B. NMR and interval PLS as reliable methods for determination of cholesterol in rodent lipoprotein fractions. Metabolomics 2010, 6, 129–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Petersen, M.; Dyrby, M.; Toubro, S.; Engelsen, S.B.; Nørgaard, L.; Pedersen, H.T.; Dyerberg, J. Quantification of lipoprotein subclasses by proton nuclear magnetic resonance–based partial least-squares regression models. Clin. Chem. 2005, 51, 1457–1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Norgaard, L.; Saudland, A.; Wagner, J.; Nielsen, J.P.; Munck, L.; Engelsen, S.B. Interval partial least-squares regression (ipls): A comparative chemometric study with an example from near-infrared spectroscopy. Appl. Spectrosc. 2000, 54, 413–419. Available online: https://opg.optica.org/as/abstract.cfm?URI=as-54-3-413 (accessed on 25 August 2025). [CrossRef]
  18. Nørgaard, L.; Hahn, M.; Knudsen, L.; Farhat, I.; Engelsen, S. Multivariate near-infrared and Raman spectroscopic quantifications of the crystallinity of lactose in whey permeate powder. Int. Dairy J. 2005, 15, 1261–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Shrivastava, A.; Gupta, V.B. Methods for the determination of limit of detection and limit of quantitation of the analytical methods. Chron. Young Sci. 2011, 2, 21–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rossini, A.J.; Zagdoun, A.; Lelli, M.; Lesage, A.; Copéret, C.; Emsley, L. Dynamic nuclear polarization surface enhanced NMR spectroscopy. Acc. Chem. Res. 2013, 46, 1942–1951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Distler, J.; Wöhrl, T.; Werner, R.; Gerlach, M.; Gollner, M.; Linseis, F.; Kita, J.; Moos, R. Miniaturized differential scanning calorimeter with an integrated mass sensing system: First steps. J. Sens. Sens. Syst. 2023, 12, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. FTIR spectra obtained during the thermal analysis under oxidizing atmosphere. The left panels (ac) show full-range spectra for frass, frass with 10% LLDPE, and pure LLDPE. The right panels display corresponding spectra at 483 °C (df). Red arrows indicate the characteristic C–H stretching bands of methyl and methylene groups at 2928 cm−1 and 2855 cm−1, associated with the decomposition of LLDPE.
Figure 1. FTIR spectra obtained during the thermal analysis under oxidizing atmosphere. The left panels (ac) show full-range spectra for frass, frass with 10% LLDPE, and pure LLDPE. The right panels display corresponding spectra at 483 °C (df). Red arrows indicate the characteristic C–H stretching bands of methyl and methylene groups at 2928 cm−1 and 2855 cm−1, associated with the decomposition of LLDPE.
Applsci 15 10244 g001
Figure 2. iPLS regression modeling of FTIR spectra at 483 °C for frass–LLDPE mixtures. (a) Root mean square error of cross-validation (RMSECV) for 20 local interval models and the global model (horizontal black line). Numbers in italic within bars indicate the number of latent variables used in each interval. (b) Predicted versus measured LLDPE content using the optimal iPLS model. The inset (c) highlights the selected spectral interval.
Figure 2. iPLS regression modeling of FTIR spectra at 483 °C for frass–LLDPE mixtures. (a) Root mean square error of cross-validation (RMSECV) for 20 local interval models and the global model (horizontal black line). Numbers in italic within bars indicate the number of latent variables used in each interval. (b) Predicted versus measured LLDPE content using the optimal iPLS model. The inset (c) highlights the selected spectral interval.
Applsci 15 10244 g002
Figure 3. Mass spectra of evolved gases obtained during thermal decomposition under oxidizing atmosphere (N2/O2) for pure frass, frass with 10% LLDPE, and pure LLDPE. Distinct ion profiles reflect differences in decomposition pathways of organic and polymeric components.
Figure 3. Mass spectra of evolved gases obtained during thermal decomposition under oxidizing atmosphere (N2/O2) for pure frass, frass with 10% LLDPE, and pure LLDPE. Distinct ion profiles reflect differences in decomposition pathways of organic and polymeric components.
Applsci 15 10244 g003
Figure 4. iPLS regression analysis using ion fragment m/z 28 from mass spectra of thermally decomposed frass–LLDPE mixtures. (a) RMSECV values for 10 interval models and the global model (horizontal black line). Italic numbers indicate the number of latent variables per interval. (b) Predicted versus measured LLDPE content for the selected model. Inset (c) shows the most predictive temperature interval (439.7–499.0 °C).
Figure 4. iPLS regression analysis using ion fragment m/z 28 from mass spectra of thermally decomposed frass–LLDPE mixtures. (a) RMSECV values for 10 interval models and the global model (horizontal black line). Italic numbers indicate the number of latent variables per interval. (b) Predicted versus measured LLDPE content for the selected model. Inset (c) shows the most predictive temperature interval (439.7–499.0 °C).
Applsci 15 10244 g004
Figure 5. iPLS regression analysis using total ion chromatogram (TIC) data from thermal decomposition of frass–LLDPE mixtures. (a) RMSECV values for 50 local models and the global model (horizontal black line). Numbers represent latent variables. (b) Predicted versus measured LLDPE concentrations for the best interval. Inset (c) shows the selected m/z range (35–45) used for TIC modeling.
Figure 5. iPLS regression analysis using total ion chromatogram (TIC) data from thermal decomposition of frass–LLDPE mixtures. (a) RMSECV values for 50 local models and the global model (horizontal black line). Numbers represent latent variables. (b) Predicted versus measured LLDPE concentrations for the best interval. Inset (c) shows the selected m/z range (35–45) used for TIC modeling.
Applsci 15 10244 g005
Figure 6. iPLS regression of DTG curves obtained under inert atmosphere (N2) for frass–LLDPE mixtures. (a) RMSECV for 10 local interval models and the global model (horizontal black line). The number of latent variables used in each interval is indicated above each bar. (b) Predicted versus measured LLDPE concentrations for the best-performing model. The selected temperature interval (433.27–500.54 °C) corresponds to the degradation peak of LLDPE. Insert shows the selected temperature interval (433.27–500.54 °C) (c).
Figure 6. iPLS regression of DTG curves obtained under inert atmosphere (N2) for frass–LLDPE mixtures. (a) RMSECV for 10 local interval models and the global model (horizontal black line). The number of latent variables used in each interval is indicated above each bar. (b) Predicted versus measured LLDPE concentrations for the best-performing model. The selected temperature interval (433.27–500.54 °C) corresponds to the degradation peak of LLDPE. Insert shows the selected temperature interval (433.27–500.54 °C) (c).
Applsci 15 10244 g006
Figure 7. iPLS regression analysis of solid-state CP-MAS 13C NMR spectra for frass–LLDPE mixtures. (a) RMSECV for 20 local interval models and the global model (horizontal black line). Italic numbers indicate latent variables per interval. (b) Predicted versus measured LLDPE content using the optimal model focused on the 10–45 ppm aliphatic carbon region. Insert shows the selected spectral interval (c).
Figure 7. iPLS regression analysis of solid-state CP-MAS 13C NMR spectra for frass–LLDPE mixtures. (a) RMSECV for 20 local interval models and the global model (horizontal black line). Italic numbers indicate latent variables per interval. (b) Predicted versus measured LLDPE content using the optimal model focused on the 10–45 ppm aliphatic carbon region. Insert shows the selected spectral interval (c).
Applsci 15 10244 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Martínez-Sabater, E.; Peñalver, R.; Ros, M.; Pascual, J.A.; Moral, R.; Marhuenda-Egea, F.C. Advanced Spectroscopic and Thermoanalytical Quantification of LLDPE in Mealworm Frass: A Multitechnique Approach. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 10244. https://doi.org/10.3390/app151810244

AMA Style

Martínez-Sabater E, Peñalver R, Ros M, Pascual JA, Moral R, Marhuenda-Egea FC. Advanced Spectroscopic and Thermoanalytical Quantification of LLDPE in Mealworm Frass: A Multitechnique Approach. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(18):10244. https://doi.org/10.3390/app151810244

Chicago/Turabian Style

Martínez-Sabater, Encarnación, Rosa Peñalver, Margarita Ros, José A. Pascual, Raul Moral, and Frutos C. Marhuenda-Egea. 2025. "Advanced Spectroscopic and Thermoanalytical Quantification of LLDPE in Mealworm Frass: A Multitechnique Approach" Applied Sciences 15, no. 18: 10244. https://doi.org/10.3390/app151810244

APA Style

Martínez-Sabater, E., Peñalver, R., Ros, M., Pascual, J. A., Moral, R., & Marhuenda-Egea, F. C. (2025). Advanced Spectroscopic and Thermoanalytical Quantification of LLDPE in Mealworm Frass: A Multitechnique Approach. Applied Sciences, 15(18), 10244. https://doi.org/10.3390/app151810244

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop