Next Article in Journal
Analytical Method for Temperature Field Distribution of Annular Double-Loop Freezing Pipes in Adjacent Urban Tunnels
Previous Article in Journal
Accidents in the Production, Transport, and Handling of Explosives: TOL Method Hazard Analysis with a Mining Case Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dynamic Proxemic Model for Human–Robot Interactions Using the Golden Ratio
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Intelligent Robotics: Design and Applications

1
College of Mountain Dawu, National Pingtung University, Pingtung 900391, Taiwan
2
Department of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, National Pingtung University, Pingtung 900391, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(18), 10151; https://doi.org/10.3390/app151810151
Submission received: 8 September 2025 / Accepted: 10 September 2025 / Published: 17 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Intelligent Robotics: Design and Applications)

1. Introduction

With the rapid development of information technology and, in particular, artificial intelligence (AI), intelligent robotics has entered a phase of accelerated growth [1,2]. The increasing demand for intelligent robots spans numerous domains, including education, healthcare, finance, catering, tourism, manufacturing, and transportation [3,4]. These systems take various forms, ranging from virtual intelligent agents (e.g., AI tutors) to physical intelligent robots (e.g., service and logistics robots used in hospitality and industrial environments) [5,6]. In parallel, intelligent robotics is playing a growing role in advancing the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by reducing human exposure to high-risk tasks, enabling more efficient resource management, and supporting inclusive access to education and healthcare [7,8].
The evolution of intelligent robotics is being fueled by several technological drivers. Advances in machine learning and deep neural networks have enabled robots to perceive their environments more accurately and adaptively [9,10]. Sensor technologies such as Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR), depth cameras, and tactile sensors provide unprecedented levels of situational awareness [11,12]. Emerging paradigms such as digital twin frameworks integrate physical robots with real-time virtual models, allowing for predictive maintenance, simulation-based optimization, and enhanced safety monitoring [13,14]. Furthermore, human–robot interaction (HRI) research has evolved from basic command-and-control systems to more natural, multimodal communication channels that involve speech, gestures, affective computing, and even emotional sound design [15,16].
The societal and industrial relevance of intelligent robots is increasingly visible. In education, intelligent tutoring agents are reshaping personalized learning and lifelong training [17,18]. In healthcare, assistive robots support elderly care, rehabilitation, and remote diagnostics [19,20]. In industrial manufacturing and logistics, autonomous mobile robots (AMRs), collaborative robots (cobots), and intelligent warehouses are transforming production efficiency [21,22]. In public services, robots deployed in hotels, airports, and hospitals are improving customer experiences through automated check-in, delivery, and cleaning tasks [23,24]. The convergence of these applications demonstrates how intelligent robotics is no longer confined to laboratory prototypes but is instead becoming a cornerstone of smart cities and Industry 4.0 ecosystems [25,26].
Despite these advances, several challenges remain at the forefront. Ensuring safety and reliability in unstructured and complex environments is an ongoing concern, particularly when robots collaborate directly with humans [27,28]. Building trust and social acceptance requires addressing ethical considerations, transparency in AI decision-making, and designing robots that respect cultural norms and human comfort [29,30]. The integration of generative AI opens new opportunities for creativity, adaptability, and natural interaction, yet it also introduces risks related to control, explainability, and misuse [31,32]. Another pressing issue is the persistent gap between industrial practice and standardization frameworks, as regulations often lag behind technological innovations, leading to uncertainties in deployment and adoption [33,34]. Addressing these challenges requires cross-disciplinary collaboration that bridges engineering, computer science, psychology, and social sciences [35,36].
In this context, the Special Issue Intelligent Robotics: Design and Applications brings together diverse contributions that reflect the state of the art in robot design, application, and societal integration. The papers in this collection showcase novel approaches ranging from digital-twin-based industrial robots to affective communication in social robots, autonomous warehouse systems, safety analysis of quadruped robots, and dynamic proxemic models for human–robot interaction [37,38,39,40,41]. Collectively, these works highlight not only the technological frontiers of intelligent robotics but also the broader implications for sustainability, industry transformation, and human–robot coexistence. The following overview highlights the key themes and findings of the papers published in this collection.

2. An Overview of Published Articles

The contributions to this Special Issue reflect the broad spectrum of approaches currently shaping the field of intelligent robotics. A first line of work emphasizes the integration of digital twin frameworks into robotic systems [37]. This study demonstrates the potential of coupling physical robots with real-time virtual models. In particular, industrial applications, such as cleaning operations in hazardous nuclear environments, can be optimized for efficiency, safety, and predictive control. Enhanced path-planning strategies and simulation-based monitoring show how digital twins can significantly reduce energy consumption and operational risks while paving the way for scalable deployment in complex industrial scenarios.
In parallel, research on affective communication for social robots illustrates the growing importance of human-centered design [38]. Instead of relying solely on speech or visual cues, robots are increasingly equipped with non-linguistic utterances (NLUs) and affective sound design generated through machine learning techniques. Experimental validation with human participants indicates that such sounds can reliably convey emotional valence and arousal, offering robots language-independent channels for interaction. This innovation broadens the cultural accessibility of social robots and underlines the need to consider multimodal, emotion-sensitive interfaces in human–robot interaction research.
From an industrial logistics perspective, the introduction of the Autonomous Industrial Mobile Warehouse (AIMW) provides an important step toward rethinking how spare parts and materials are distributed in large-scale factories [39]. Unlike conventional Automated Guided Vehicles (AGVs) or Autonomous Mobile Robots (AMRs), the AIMW replaces static storage systems with mobile and adaptive warehouses, reducing delays in maintenance and increasing overall flexibility. At the same time, these implementations reveal significant gaps between research prototypes and existing industrial standards, pointing to the urgent need for updated regulatory frameworks that can keep pace with technological innovation.
The Special Issue also addresses the pressing issue of safety in collaborative robotics, particularly in relation to quadruped robots deployed in smart factories [40]. By combining operator surveys with Delphi-based expert consultations, researchers identified collision, path deviation, and sensor reliability as critical risk factors. Moreover, the analysis revealed distinct differences in risk perception between developers, safety experts, and end-users, which highlights how stakeholder background influences expectations and concerns. These insights demonstrate that technical solutions alone are insufficient, and that effective deployment requires collaboration among engineers, industry practitioners, and policymakers, as well as tailored education and training initiatives.
Finally, research on dynamic proxemic models introduces a novel human-centered perspective to robot navigation and interaction [41]. By leveraging the golden ratio to define adaptive comfort and safety zones, these models allow robots to modulate their behavior in response to human position, orientation, and motion. Experiments conducted with both quadruped and wheeled robots confirmed that such approaches not only improve physical safety but also increase perceived comfort and acceptance among human users. This work points to a new generation of socially aware robots capable of respecting psychological as well as physical boundaries in shared spaces.
Taken together, the articles in this Special Issue illustrate how intelligent robotics is advancing along complementary directions: enhancing autonomy and efficiency in industrial applications, enriching emotional and social capabilities in human-centered contexts, addressing safety and regulatory concerns in collaborative environments, and embedding social awareness into navigation and interaction models. Collectively, they highlight the interdisciplinary character of the field, demonstrating how progress in intelligent robotics increasingly requires the integration of engineering, AI, human factors, and policy considerations.

3. Conclusions

The contributions to this Special Issue collectively highlight the accelerating pace and widening scope of intelligent robotics research. The studies reviewed here illustrate how emerging technologies, such as digital twins, affective interaction models, autonomous mobile warehouses, collaborative safety assessments, and dynamic proxemic frameworks, are shaping both industrial and social dimensions of robotics. These works confirm that intelligent robotics is no longer an isolated technical discipline but rather an inherently interdisciplinary field that requires the integration of engineering, computer science, cognitive psychology, ethics, and policy [42]. At the same time, they demonstrate that progress must be evaluated not only in terms of technical performance but also in relation to human acceptance, regulatory compliance, and sustainable development [43].
Looking forward, several key directions emerge. First, further work is needed to strengthen the link between digital and physical systems, enabling predictive maintenance and large-scale deployment of robots in hazardous and mission-critical environments [44]. Second, advances in human–robot interaction should extend beyond functional communication to encompass affective, cultural, and ethical dimensions, ensuring that robots can operate in diverse social contexts [45]. Third, the rapid growth of autonomous logistics and collaborative robots underscores the urgency of developing updated regulatory frameworks and international standards that can guide safe and equitable deployment [46]. Fourth, there is a growing need to design robots that are not only technically capable but also socially aware, integrating adaptive proxemic models, explainable AI, and context-sensitive learning mechanisms to build trust with human users [47]. Finally, the alignment of intelligent robotics with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) should be further strengthened, positioning robots as enablers of environmental sustainability, inclusive education, and equitable healthcare [48].
In conclusion, the works included in this Special Issue demonstrate both the promise and complexity of intelligent robotics. They provide a foundation for future exploration but also call for more ambitious, interdisciplinary, and human-centered research agendas. It is expected that continued efforts in these directions will foster the development of intelligent robotic systems that are efficient, safe, and adaptive, while also being ethical, socially accepted, and globally impactful.

Author Contributions

Y.-C.L.: writing—original draft preparation; Y.-T.L.: writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Raj, R.; Kos, A. Artificial intelligence: Evolution, developments, applications, and future scope. Prz. Elektrotech. 2023, 99, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bharadiya, J.P.; Thomas, R.K.; Ahmed, F. Rise of artificial intelligence in business and industry. J. Eng Res. Rep. 2023, 25, 85–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Adel, A. The Convergence of Intelligent Tutoring, Robotics, and IoT in Smart Education for the Transition from Industry 4.0 to 5.0. Smart Cities 2024, 7, 325–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Skubis, I.; Wolniak, R.; Grebski, W.W. AI and Human-Centric Approach in Smart Cities Management: Case Studies from Silesian and Lesser Poland Voivodships. Sustainability 2024, 16, 8279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Venkateswaran, P.S.; Sriramkumar, M.; Vaddy, R.K.; Kotagiri, A.; Rajest, S.S.; Regin, R. Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Robots in Service Industries. In Advancing Intelligent Networks Through Distributed Optimization; Rajest, S., Moccia, S., Singh, B., Regin, R., Jeganathan, J., Eds.; IGI Global Scientific Publishing: Hershey, PA, USA, 2024; pp. 61–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Saputra, F.E.; Buhalis, D.; Augustyn, M.M.; Marangos, S. Anthropomorphism-based artificial intelligence (AI) robots typology in hospitality and tourism. J. Hosp. Tour. Technol. 2024, 15, 790–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jhang, J.N.; Lin, Y.C.; Lin, Y.T. A Study on the Effectiveness of a Hybrid Digital-Physical Board Game Incorporating the Sustainable Development Goals in Elementary School Sustainability Education. Sustainability 2025, 17, 6775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lin, Y.C.; Lin, Y.T. The Effectiveness of Developing Cloud-Based Agricultural Environmental Sensing System to Support Food and Agriculture Education in Elementary School. Int. J. Inf. Educ. Technol. 2025, 15, 8–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Thangamani, R.; Suguna, R.K.; Kamalam, G.K. Drones and autonomous robotics incorporating computational intelligence. In Computational Intelligent Techniques in Mechatronics; Prakash, K.B., Peddapelli, S.K., Tam, I.C.K., Woo, W.L., Jain, V., Eds.; Wiley Online Library: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2024; Chapter 8; pp. 243–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kalakunnath, N.; Varghese, A.; Anuradha, A.P.; Girish, D.K.; Sasidharan, R. Advances in Deep Learning for Autonomous Vehicle Perception: A Comprehensive Review. J. Comput. Cogn. Eng. 2025. Online First. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, J.; Seng, K.P.; Smith, J.; Ang, L.M. Situation awareness in ai-based technologies and multimodal systems: Architectures, challenges and applications. IEEE Access 2024, 12, 88779–88818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yeong, D.J.; Panduru, K.; Walsh, J. Exploring the Unseen: A Survey of Multi-Sensor Fusion and the Role of Explainable AI (XAI) in Autonomous Vehicles. Sensors 2025, 25, 856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Aivaliotis, P.; Arkouli, Z.; Georgoulias, K.; Makris, S. Methodology for enabling dynamic digital twins and virtual model evolution in industrial robotics-a predictive maintenance application. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 2023, 36, 947–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Al Zami, M.B.; Shaon, S.; Quy, V.K.; Nguyen, D.C. Digital twin in industries: A comprehensive survey. IEEE Access 2025, 13, 47291–47336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Salinas-Martínez, Á.-G.; Cunillé-Rodríguez, J.; Aquino-López, E.; García-Moreno, A.-I. Multimodal Human–Robot Interaction Using Gestures and Speech: A Case Study for Printed Circuit Board Manufacturing. J. Manuf. Mater. Process. 2024, 8, 274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, T.; Zheng, P.; Li, S.; Wang, L. Multimodal Human–Robot Interaction for Human-Centric Smart Manufacturing: A Survey. Adv. Intell. Syst. 2024, 6, 2300359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shoukat, W.; Rizwan, N.; Khan, M.T. The role of artificial intelligence (AI) tutors in personalized learning: Benefits and challenges. JSSR 2025, 3, 1–13. Available online: https://socialsignsreivew.com/index.php/12/article/view/188 (accessed on 10 September 2025).
  18. Pan, K.; Sen, R. Navigating the Evolving Landscape of Personalized Learning in AIED: Recent Trends and Innovations. In Explainable AI for Education: Recent Trends and Challenges; Singh, T., Dutta, S., Vyas, S., Rocha, Á., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2024; pp. 169–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Aymerich-Franch, L.; Ferrer, I. Socially assistive robots’ deployment in healthcare settings: A global perspective. Int. J. Humanoid Robot. 2023, 20, 2350002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ahmad, I.; Asghar, Z.; Kumar, T.; Li, G.; Manzoor, A.; Mikhaylov, K.; Shah, S.A.; Höyhtyä, M.; Reponen, J.; Huusko, J.; et al. Emerging technologies for next generation remote health care and assisted living. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 56094–56132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Choudhary, T. Autonomous Robots and AI in Warehousing: Improving Efficiency and Safety. IJITMIS 2025, 16, 216–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Shah, R.; Doss, A.S.A.; Lakshmaiya, N. Advancements in AI-Enhanced Collaborative Robotics: Towards Safer, Smarter, and Human-Centric Industrial Automation. Results Eng. 2025, 27, 105704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sousa, A.E.; Cardoso, P.; Dias, F. The Use of Artificial Intelligence Systems in Tourism and Hospitality: The Tourists’ Perspective. Adm. Sci. 2024, 14, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tuomi, A.; Tussyadiah, I.P.; Stienmetz, J. Applications and Implications of Service Robots in Hospitality. Cornell Hosp. Q. 2021, 62, 232–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Adel, A. Unlocking the Future: Fostering Human–Machine Collaboration and Driving Intelligent Automation through Industry 5.0 in Smart Cities. Smart Cities 2023, 6, 2742–2782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Urrea, C. Artificial Intelligence-Driven and Bio-Inspired Control Strategies for Industrial Robotics: A Systematic Review of Trends, Challenges, and Sustainable Innovations Toward Industry 5.0. Machines 2025, 13, 666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Adesiji, A.D.; Ibitoye, S.E.; Mahamood, R.M.; Olayemi, O.A.; Omoniyi, P.O.; Jen, T.-C.; Akinlabi, E.T. Safety Considerations in Deployment of Robotic Systems—A Systematic Review. J. Field Robot. 2025. Early View. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Haskard, A.; Herath, D. Secure Robotics: Navigating Challenges at the Nexus of Safety, Trust, and Cybersecurity in Cyber-Physical Systems. ACM Comput. Surv. 2025, 57, 1–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Pirjan, A.; Petroşanu, D.M. Artificial Social Intelligence and The Transformation of Human Interaction by Artificial Intelligence Agents. JISOM 2025, 19, 259–305. [Google Scholar]
  30. Rane, N.; Choudhary, S.P.; Rane, J. Acceptance of artificial intelligence: Key factors, challenges, and implementation strategies. J. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2024, 5, 50–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Amankwah-Amoah, J.; Abdalla, S.; Mogaji, E.; Elbanna, A.; Dwivedi, Y.K. The impending disruption of creative industries by generative AI: Opportunities, challenges, and research agenda. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2024, 79, 102759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Trigka, M.; Dritsas, E. The Evolution of Generative AI: Trends and Applications. IEEE Access 2025, 13, 98504–98529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lescrauwaet, L.; Wagner, H.; Yoon, C.; Shukla, S. Adaptive legal frameworks and economic dynamics in emerging tech-nologies: Navigating the intersection for responsible innovation. Law Econ. 2022, 16, 202–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lund, B.; Orhan, Z.; Mannuru, N.R.; Bevara, R.V.K.; Porter, B.; Vinaih, M.K.; Bhaskara, P. Standards, frameworks, and legislation for artificial intelligence (AI) transparency. AI Ethics 2025, 5, 3639–3655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chakrabarty, P.; Das, D.; Singhwal, N.; Geetha, P.; Parthasarathy, J.; Biswas, S.; Kumar, S.; Sudhin, S. Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration: Bridging Management and Computer Engineering for Innovation. J. Inf. Syst. Eng. Manag. 2025, 10, 1764–1775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yuwono, E.I.; Tjondronegoro, D.; Riverola, C.; Loy, J. Co-creation in action: Bridging the knowledge gap in artificial intelligence among innovation champions. Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell. 2024, 7, 100272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Li, M.; Chen, F.; Zhou, W. Digital-Twin-Based System for Foam Cleaning Robots in Spent Fuel Pools. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Khota, A.; Cooper, E.W.; Yan, Y. Synthesis of Non-Linguistic Utterances for Sound Design Support Using a Genetic Algorithm. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 4572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Garcia, E.; Montaña, M.; Montés, N. Survival 1.0: A Novel Autonomous Industrial Mobile Warehouse (AIMW) for Industrial Environments. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 9781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Go, E.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, S.Y.; Lee, J.S.; Kim, H.H.; Lim, J.Y. Stakeholder Perspectives on Safety Issues in Collaborative Mobile Robots: A Case Study of Quadruped Robot Applications in a Smart Factory. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 10232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Spurný, T.; Babjak, J.; Bobovský, Z.; Vysocký, A. Dynamic Proxemic Model for Human–Robot Interactions Using the Golden Ratio. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 8130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Licardo, J.T.; Domjan, M.; Orehovački, T. Intelligent Robotics—A Systematic Review of Emerging Technologies and Trends. Electronics 2024, 13, 542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Afroogh, S.; Akbari, A.; Malone, E.; Kargar, M.; Alambeigi, H. Trust in AI: Progress, challenges, and future directions. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 2024, 11, 1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Mitchell, D.; Baniqued, P.D.E.; Kivrak, H.; Blanche, J.; Bremner, P.A.; Harper, S.; Jiang, Z.; Pulgarin, E.J.L.; Paterson, J.; Carrasco, J.; et al. Cyber-physical-human systems for mobile robots in energy asset management: Current practices and future opportunities. Energy AI 2025, 21, 100570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Lim, V.; Rooksby, M.; Cross, E.S. Social robots on a global stage: Establishing a role for culture during human–robot interaction. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 2021, 13, 1307–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Bilal, M.; Ameer, S.; Awan, A.S.; Mumtaz, A.; Gul, S.; Shahbaz, N. Regulating the Future: A Holistic Model for Safe and Ethical Deployment of Robotic Systems in Emerging Industries. J. Comput. Biomed. Inform. 2025, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Khaled, Y.; Ehab, N. Leveraging Context-Sensitivity for User-Centered Explainability. Eur. J. Artif. Intell. 2025, Online First. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Almuaythir, S.; Singh, A.K.; Alhusban, M.; Daoud, A.O. Robotics technology: Catalyst for sustainable development—Impact on innovation, healthcare, inequality, and economic growth. Discov. Sustain. 2024, 5, 486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lin, Y.-C.; Lin, Y.-T. Intelligent Robotics: Design and Applications. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 10151. https://doi.org/10.3390/app151810151

AMA Style

Lin Y-C, Lin Y-T. Intelligent Robotics: Design and Applications. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(18):10151. https://doi.org/10.3390/app151810151

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lin, Yi-Chun, and Yen-Ting Lin. 2025. "Intelligent Robotics: Design and Applications" Applied Sciences 15, no. 18: 10151. https://doi.org/10.3390/app151810151

APA Style

Lin, Y.-C., & Lin, Y.-T. (2025). Intelligent Robotics: Design and Applications. Applied Sciences, 15(18), 10151. https://doi.org/10.3390/app151810151

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop