From Empirical Judgment to Data-Driven Approaches: A Survey of Traffic Reorganization and Management During Urban River-Crossing Corridor Construction
Abstract
1. Introduction
1.1. Research Background and Urgency of Practical Demands
1.2. Current State of Technology Development and Core Challenges
1.3. Review Methodology and Technical Approach
2. From Empirical Methods to Data-Driven: Paradigm Transformation and Intelligent Computing Technology Foundations
2.1. Technical Bottlenecks and Fundamental Limitations of Traditional Empirical Judgment Methods
2.1.1. Systematic Issues of Insufficient Prediction Accuracy
2.1.2. Technical Deficiencies in Capacity Estimation Methods
2.1.3. Fundamental Deficiencies in System Complexity Handling Capabilities
2.2. Technical Advantages and Revolutionary Breakthroughs of Data-Driven Methods
2.2.1. Significant Advantages and Breakthrough Progress of Intelligent Prediction Technologies
2.2.2. Collaborative Optimization Capabilities of Intelligent Transportation Systems
2.2.3. Core Technical Advantages of Data-Driven Methods
2.3. Technical Implementation Pathways for Holographic Sensing and Intelligent Computing
2.3.1. Large-Scale Intelligent Transportation Network Collaborative Control Technology
2.3.2. Four-Layer Technical Architecture for Holographic Sensing and Intelligent Computing
2.3.3. Key Success Factors for Technical Implementation Pathways
3. Traffic Model Construction and Impact Assessment Analysis During Corridor Construction
3.1. Traffic Model Construction for Urban River-Crossing Corridor Closure Construction Scenarios
3.1.1. Multi-Source Heterogeneous Data-Driven Modeling Methodological Innovation
3.1.2. BrIM-Based Traffic Impact Visualization Modeling
3.2. Application of Mixed Traffic Flow Simulation Technology in Traffic Reorganization
3.2.1. Multi-Level Collaborative Simulation Technology System
3.2.2. Simulation Accuracy Enhancement and Validation Method Innovation
3.3. Travel Pattern Change Prediction and Impact Assessment During Corridor Construction
3.3.1. Deep Mechanisms of Travel Pattern Evolution Patterns
3.3.2. Systematic Innovation in Traffic Impact Assessment Methods
4. Intelligent Traffic Organization and Guidance Management Strategies
4.1. Traffic Organization Optimization Based on Supply-Demand Matching
4.1.1. Technical Integration and Collaborative Optimization of Intelligent Transportation Systems
4.1.2. Intelligent Evolution of Traffic Control Strategies
4.2. Traffic Guidance and Route Optimization During Corridor Construction
4.2.1. Theory and Practice of Multi-Path Collaborative Optimization
4.2.2. Systematic Innovation in Regional Collaborative Control
4.3. Emergency Response and Management for Sudden Situations
4.3.1. Dynamic Network Modeling and Intelligent Decision Support
4.3.2. Application of Reinforcement Learning in Emergency Control
5. Integrated Platform Architecture and System Implementation
5.1. System Architecture Design of Data-Driven Traffic Management Platform
5.2. Cross-Departmental Collaborative Traffic Management Decision Support System
5.3. Platform Key Technologies and Operational Assurance Mechanisms
6. Application Practice, Challenges, and Development Trends
6.1. Analysis of Typical Engineering Application Cases
6.2. Implementation Barriers and Critical Challenges
6.2.1. Critical Analysis of Implementation Barriers and Limitations
- Technical Implementation Challenges
- 2.
- Economic and Organizational Constraints
- 3.
- Implementation Failure Patterns and Risk Factors
6.2.2. Technological Evolution Barriers and Future Implementation Challenges
6.3. Future Development Trends and Technological Evolution Directions
6.4. Comprehensive Analysis of Data-Driven Traffic Management Technologies
7. Conclusions
7.1. Primary Research Conclusions
7.2. Theoretical Contributions and Application Value
7.3. Overall Conclusions
8. Discussion
8.1. Emerging Technology Integration and System Evolution
8.2. Research Limitations and Future Research Directions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
AI | Artificial Intelligence |
ANN | Artificial Neural Network |
BIM | Building Information Modeling |
BrIM | Bridge Information Modeling |
CDE | Common Data Environment |
DNN | Deep Neural Network |
EEMD | Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition |
ETC | Electronic Toll Collection |
GA-LSTM | Genetic Algorithm-Long Short-Term Memory |
GIS | Geographic Information System |
GPS | Global Positioning System |
ICA | Improved Cellular Automata |
IoT | Internet of Things |
ITS | Intelligent Transportation Systems |
I-UDT | Intelligent Urban Digital Twin |
LSTM | Long Short-Term Memory |
MAE | Mean Absolute Error |
MAPE | Mean Absolute Percentage Error |
MARLIN-ATSC | Multiagent Reinforcement Learning for Integrated Network of Adaptive Traffic Signal Controllers |
MPC | Model Predictive Control |
OD | Origin-Destination |
RMSE | Root Mean Square Error |
ST-ResNet | Spatiotemporal Residual Network |
SUMO | Simulation of Urban Mobility |
SVM | Support Vector Machine |
TIA | Traffic Impact Analysis |
UTMOM | Urban Traffic Mobility Optimization Model |
WebBIM | Web-based Building Information Modeling |
WebGIS | Web-based Geographic Information System |
5G | Fifth Generation mobile networks |
References
- Marzouk, M.; Elsayed, A. Framework for assessing bridges construction impact on work zone traffic using BrIM. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ullman, G.L.; Schroeder, J.L.; Gopalakrishna, D. Use of Technology and Data for Effective Work Zone Management: Work Zone ITS Implementation Guide; Report No. FHWA-HOP-14-008; United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration: Washington, DC, USA, 2014.
- Wang, C.; Atkison, T.; Park, H. Dynamic adaptive vehicle re-routing strategy for traffic congestion mitigation of grid network. Int. J. Transp. Sci. Technol. 2024, 14, 120–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ding, K.; Peng, R.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, X.; Liu, F.; Zhu, Y.; Liu, Y. Vulnerability study of urban river-crossing passages considering the impact of disruption on travel. Transp. Res. Rec. 2025, 2679, 212–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gong, H.; Peng, Q.; Liu, L.; Yang, X. A decision-making system for traffic management during large-scale road network construction. Expert Syst. Appl. 2025, 292, 128527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Wang, F.Y.; Wang, K.; Lin, W.H.; Xu, X.; Chen, C. Data-driven intelligent transportation systems: A survey. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2011, 12, 1624–1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Yang, X. The key technologies of new generation urban traffic control system review and prospect: Case by China. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 7195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dickerson, C.L., III; Wang, J.; Witherspoon, J.; Crumley, S.C. Work zone management in the district of Columbia: Deploying a citywide transportation management plan and work zone project management system. Transp. Res. Rec. 2016, 2554, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jehn, N.L.; Turochy, R.E. Development of breakdown probability models and heavy vehicle passenger car equivalents for rural freeway work zones. Transp. Res. Rec. 2020, 2674, 144–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mashhadi, A.H.; Farhadmanesh, M.; Rashidi, A.; Marković, N. Review of methods for estimating construction work zone capacity. Transp. Res. Rec. 2021, 2675, 382–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, B.; Chien, S.; Lee, J.; Spasovic, L. Predicting freeway work zone delays and costs with a hybrid machine-learning model. J. Adv. Transp. 2017, 2017, 6937385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lv, Y.; Duan, Y.; Kang, W.; Li, Z.; Wang, F.Y. Traffic flow prediction with big data: A deep learning approach. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2014, 16, 865–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Yang, X. An empirical comparison of urban road travel time prediction methods—Deep learning, ensemble strategies and performance evaluation. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 8075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El-Tantawy, S.; Abdulhai, B.; Abdelgawad, H. Multiagent reinforcement learning for integrated network of adaptive traffic signal controllers (MARLIN-ATSC): Methodology and large-scale application on downtown Toronto. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2013, 14, 1140–1150. [Google Scholar]
- Vlahogianni, E.I.; Karlaftis, M.G.; Golias, J.C. Short-term traffic forecasting: Where we are and where we’re going. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 2014, 43, 3–19. [Google Scholar]
- Sayed, S.A.; Abdel-Hamid, Y.; Hefny, H.A. Artificial intelligence-based traffic flow prediction: A comprehensive review. J. Electr. Syst. Inf. Technol. 2023, 10, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, T.; Sahu, A.K.; Talwalkar, A.; Smith, V. Federated learning: Challenges, methods, and future directions. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 2020, 37, 50–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Zheng, Y.; Qi, D. Deep spatio-temporal residual networks for citywide crowd flows prediction. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, San Francisco, CA, USA, 4–9 February 2017; AAAI Press: Menlo Park, CA, USA, 2017; Volume 31. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Y.; Yang, X. Non-conventional lane design and control coordination optimization at urban road intersections: Review and prospects. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 6720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ulvi, H.; Yerlikaya, M.A.; Yildiz, K. Urban traffic mobility optimization model: A novel mathematical approach for predictive urban traffic analysis. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 5873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Macioszek, E.; Jurdana, I.; Sierpiński, G. (Eds.) Road Traffic Analysis, Theoretical Approaches and Practical Solutions; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Ansari, F.A.; Pani, A.; Mohapatra, S.S. Improving highway work zone mobility in the developing world: A systematic literature review of work zone delay measures and technological solutions. Transp. Res. Rec. 2025, 2679, 1091–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meng, Q.; Weng, J. An improved cellular automata model for heterogeneous work zone traffic. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 2011, 19, 1263–1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lopez, P.A.; Behrisch, M.; Bieker-Walz, L.; Erdmann, J.; Flötteröd, Y.P.; Hilbrich, R.; Lücken, L.; Rummel, J.; Wagner, P.; Wießner, E. Microscopic traffic simulation using SUMO. In Proceedings of the 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), Maui, HI, USA, 4–7 November 2018; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2018; pp. 2575–2582. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, D.; Zhao, X.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, X.; Chen, C. Study on the day-based work zone scheduling problem in urban road networks based on the day-to-day traffic assignment model. Transp. Res. Rec. 2018, 2672, 14–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, J.; Tian, Y.; Ren, G. Development trend and prospect of traffic system simulation technology. Sci. Technol. Foresight 2023, 2, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barceló, J. Fundamentals of Traffic Simulation; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2010; Volume 145. [Google Scholar]
- Ramezani, H.; Benekohal, R. Optimized speed harmonization with connected vehicles for work zones. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 18th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Gran Canaria, Spain, 15–18 September 2015; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2015; pp. 1081–1086. [Google Scholar]
- Mashhadi, A.H.; Rashidi, A.; Hamedi, M.; Marković, N. Traffic estimation in work zones using a custom regression model and data augmentation. Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 2025, 40, 1422–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mammar, S.; Messmer, A.; Jensen, P.; Papageorgiou, M.; Haj-Salem, H.; Jensen, L. Automatic control of variable message signs in Aalborg. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 1996, 4, 131–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pasquale, C.; Papamichail, I.; Roncoli, C.; Sacone, S.; Siri, S.; Papageorgiou, M. Two-class freeway traffic regulation to reduce congestion and emissions via nonlinear optimal control. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 2015, 55, 85–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Yang, X.; Liang, H.; Liu, Y. A review of the self-adaptive traffic signal control system based on future traffic environment. J. Adv. Transp. 2018, 2018, 1096123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Luca, S.; Di Pace, R.; Memoli, S.; Pariota, L. Sustainable traffic management in an urban area: An integrated framework for real-time traffic control and route guidance design. Sustainability 2020, 12, 726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, S.; Wang, L.; Han, G.; Guo, Z. The effectiveness of route guidance for expressway reconstruction and expansion projects. Int. J. Transp. Sci. Technol. 2025, 18, 193–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Menelaou, C.; Timotheou, S.; Kolios, P.; Panayiotou, C.G. Joint route guidance and demand management for real-time control of multi-regional traffic networks. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2021, 23, 8302–8315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ben-Akiva, M.; De Palma, A.; Isam, K. Dynamic network models and driver information systems. Transp. Res. Part A Gen. 1991, 25, 251–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, K.; Guler, S.I.; Menendez, M. Isolated intersection control for various levels of vehicle technology: Conventional, connected, and automated vehicles. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 2016, 72, 109–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdulhai, B.; Pringle, R.; Karakoulas, G.J. Reinforcement learning for true adaptive traffic signal control. J. Transp. Eng. 2003, 129, 278–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schroeder, B.; Warchol, S.; Laffey, S.; Grosso, R.; Rowe, G.; Pate, A.; McCauley, B.; Sanchez-Badillo, A. Work Zone Intelligent Transportation Systems-Technology Supplement; Report No. FHWA-HOP-21-021; United States Federal Highway Administration: Washington, DC, USA, 2021.
- Kouvelas, A.; Lioris, J.; Fayazi, S.A.; Varaiya, P. Maximum pressure controller for stabilizing queues in signalized arterial networks. Transp. Res. Rec. 2014, 2421, 133–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Yang, X. A novel method for traffic parameter extraction and analysis based on vehicle trajectory data for signal control optimization. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 7155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ritchie, S.G. A knowledge-based decision support architecture for advanced traffic management. Transp. Res. Part A Gen. 1990, 24, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Dunkel, J.; Fernández, A.; Ortiz, R.; Ossowski, S. Event-driven architecture for decision support in traffic management systems. Expert Syst. Appl. 2011, 38, 6530–6539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, X.; Chen, H.; Yang, Y.; Wu, H.; Zhang, W.; Zhao, J.; Xiong, Y. Traffic flow prediction by an ensemble framework with data denoising and deep learning model. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Its Appl. 2021, 565, 125574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sayed, M.A.; Hossain, M.A.; Rahman, M.M.; Ali, G.M.N.; Islam, M.A.; Paul, K.C.; Qin, X. Public sentiment analysis of roadway work zones using social media data and machine learning models. Data Sci. Manag. 2025, in press. [CrossRef]
- Yu, W.; Xiaowei, H.; Shu, C.; Zonghao, R. Travel time prediction of urban agglomeration significance channel: A case study on the cross-Hangzhou Bay channel. J. Adv. Transp. 2025, 2025, 7487314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boyarkina, V.; Banite, A.; Arteeva, V.; Skhvediani, A. Evaluation of the socio-economic impact of a transport infrastructure construction project: A case study of the Bolshoy Smolensky Bridge. In Digital Transformation of Socio-Economic and Technical Systems: Theory and Practice; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2025; pp. 387–402. [Google Scholar]
- Withers, A.J. Tradeoffs in Transportation Repair and Rehabilitation Decision-Making: A Case Study of the Delaware I-495 Bridge Repair. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Yun, T.S.; Kim, D.; Moon, I.C.; Bae, J.W. Agent-based model for urban administration: A case study of bridge construction and its traffic dispersion effect. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 2022, 25, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brusselaers, N.; Fredriksson, A.; Gundlegård, D.; Zernis, R. Decision support for improved construction traffic management and planning. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2024, 104, 105305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zambrano-Martinez, J.L.; Calafate, C.T.; Soler, D.; Cano, J.C.; Manzoni, P. Modeling and characterization of traffic flows in urban environments. Sensors 2018, 18, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Liu, J.; Wan, D. Economic analysis of urban river-crossing traffic infrastructure based on TIA. In Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Management and Service Science, Beijing, China, 20–22 September 2009; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2009; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, W.; Cao, Y.; Wu, W.; Guo, J. Spatial impact analysis of trans-Yangtze highway fixed links: A case study of the Yangtze River Delta, China. J. Transp. Geogr. 2020, 88, 102822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Livingston, J. Intelligent Transportation Systems in Work Zones—A Case Study: Work Zone Travel Time System. In Reducing Congestion with the Use of a Traffic Management Contract Incentive During the Reconstruction of Arizona State Route 68; Report No. FHWA-HOP-04-032; United States Department of Transportation: Washington, DC, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Dan, D.; Ying, Y.; Ge, L. Digital twin system of bridges group based on machine vision fusion monitoring of bridge traffic load. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2021, 23, 22190–22205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hagen, A.; Andersen, T.M. Asset management, condition monitoring and Digital Twins: Damage detection and virtual inspection on a reinforced concrete bridge. Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 2024, 20, 1242–1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, Y.; Xiong, G.; Hu, Z.; Chai, C.; Li, H. Bridge digital twin for practical bridge operation and maintenance by integrating GIS and BIM. Buildings 2024, 14, 3731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, S.; Yoon, S. AI agent-based intelligent urban digital twin (I-UDT): Concept, methodology, and case studies. Smart Cities 2025, 8, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goumiri, S.; Yahiaoui, S.; Djahel, S. Smart mobility in smart cities: Emerging challenges, recent advances and future directions. J. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2025, 29, 81–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Luo, R.; Yang, X. Urban traffic state sensing and analysis based on ETC data: A survey. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 6863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahomed, A.S.; Saha, A.K. Unleashing the potential of 5G for smart cities: A focus on real-time digital twin integration. Smart Cities 2025, 8, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, D.; Zheng, A.; Yu, W.; Cao, H.; Ling, Q.; Liu, J.; Zhou, D. Digital twin technology in transportation infrastructure: A comprehensive survey of current applications, challenges, and future directions. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 1911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gkoumas, K.; Stepniak, M.; Cheimariotis, I.; Marques dos Santos, F. New technologies for bridge inspection and monitoring: A perspective from European Union research and innovation projects. Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 2024, 20, 1120–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad Jan, M.; Adil, M.; Brik, B.; Harous, S.; Abbas, S. Making sense of big data in intelligent transportation systems: Current trends, challenges and future directions. ACM Comput. Surv. 2025, 57, 197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, S.; Chen, D.; Li, L.; Miramini, S.; Zhang, L. Optimized bridge maintenance strategies: A system reliability–based approach to enhancing road network performance. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2024, 150, 04023167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lou, O.; Wang, M.; Zheng, S. Traffic load prediction for bridge construction based on Internet of Things and BIM. Alex. Eng. J. 2025, 127, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nagatani, T. Dynamic model for traffic concentration and congestion near bridge. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Its Appl. 2023, 621, 128800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pamuła, T.; Żochowska, R. Estimation and prediction of the OD matrix in uncongested urban road network based on traffic flows using deep learning. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2023, 117, 105550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Technical Dimension | Traditional Empirical Methods | Data-Driven Methods | Technical Breakthroughs and Advantages |
---|---|---|---|
Data Foundation | Historical statistical data, expert experiential knowledge | Multi-source real-time big data, intelligent analysis algorithms | Rich data dimensions, broad coverage, strong real-time capability |
Modeling Approach | Linear regression, empirical formula derivation | Deep learning, machine learning, neural networks | Nonlinear modeling capability, adaptive learning mechanisms |
Prediction Accuracy | Insufficient prediction accuracy in traditional methods | Advanced models achieving accuracy above 80% | Significantly improved prediction accuracy, substantially reduced errors |
Response Speed | Hour-level to day-level response time | Minute-level, second-level real-time response | Fundamental enhancement in real-time response capability |
Adaptation Capability | Static fixed parameter mode | Dynamic adaptive parameter adjustment | Stronger adaptability to complex changing scenarios |
System Coordination | Relatively independent subsystem operation | Multi-system deep integration collaborative optimization | Significantly enhanced systematic coordination capability |
Decision Mechanism | Qualitative analysis and empirical judgment dominated | Quantitative analysis combined with intelligent reasoning | Substantially improved decision scientific rigor and precision |
Learning Capability | Relying on manual experience accumulation and inheritance | Automated continuous learning optimization mechanisms | Continuous improvement and knowledge accumulation capability |
Case Name | Country | Project Characteristics | Main Technical Methods | Key Innovation Points | Application Effects | Literature Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cross-Hangzhou Bay Channel Prediction System | China | Travel time prediction for important corridors in urban agglomerations | GA-LSTM neural network integration framework | Genetic algorithm optimized road segment division, LSTM captures spatiotemporal dependencies | Significantly improved prediction accuracy compared to traditional methods | [46] |
Bolshoy Smolensky Bridge Construction Project | Russia | Socioeconomic impact assessment of urban transportation infrastructure | Comprehensive impact assessment methodology system | Multi-dimensional socioeconomic benefit quantitative analysis | Identified benefits including reduced travel time and enhanced regional investment attractiveness | [47] |
I-495 Bridge Emergency Repair Project | United States | 59-day emergency closure for repair, crossing Christina River | Multi-modal multi-attribute tradeoff decision analysis | Rapid emergency response mechanisms, innovative construction methods for accelerated recovery | Temporary measures effectively alleviated congestion, bus and rail ridership increased significantly | [48] |
Sejong City Bridge Construction Project | Republic of Korea | Traffic dispersion analysis for new city bridge construction | Agent-based urban management model | Individual-level movement behavior modeling, representative simulation of entire city population | Model achieved statistical validation consistency with real data, providing support for city-level management | [49] |
Construction Traffic Management Optimization Project | Multiple European Countries | Coordinated management of multiple parallel construction projects | Integration of traditional traffic simulation and transportation planning | Rigorous construction transport planning, peak-avoidance construction strategies | Significantly alleviated traffic congestion through peak time avoidance | [50] |
Interstate 68 Highway Reconstruction Project | United States | Intelligent transportation systems work zone application | Traffic management contract incentive mechanisms | Deep integration of contract incentives with intelligent transportation systems | Work zone congestion significantly reduced, demonstrating ITS application prospects | [54] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Gu, K.; Wang, Y.; Yang, Z.; Liu, Y. From Empirical Judgment to Data-Driven Approaches: A Survey of Traffic Reorganization and Management During Urban River-Crossing Corridor Construction. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 10133. https://doi.org/10.3390/app151810133
Gu K, Wang Y, Yang Z, Liu Y. From Empirical Judgment to Data-Driven Approaches: A Survey of Traffic Reorganization and Management During Urban River-Crossing Corridor Construction. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(18):10133. https://doi.org/10.3390/app151810133
Chicago/Turabian StyleGu, Kan, Yizhe Wang, Zheng Yang, and Yangdong Liu. 2025. "From Empirical Judgment to Data-Driven Approaches: A Survey of Traffic Reorganization and Management During Urban River-Crossing Corridor Construction" Applied Sciences 15, no. 18: 10133. https://doi.org/10.3390/app151810133
APA StyleGu, K., Wang, Y., Yang, Z., & Liu, Y. (2025). From Empirical Judgment to Data-Driven Approaches: A Survey of Traffic Reorganization and Management During Urban River-Crossing Corridor Construction. Applied Sciences, 15(18), 10133. https://doi.org/10.3390/app151810133