Next Article in Journal
Behavior Spectrum-Based Pedestrian Risk Classification via YOLOv8–ByteTrack and CRITIC–Kmeans
Previous Article in Journal
Subcritical Water Extraction of Rosa alba L.—Technology and Quality of the Products
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

A Tunnel Secondary Lining Leakage Recognition Model Based on an Improved TransUNet

1
School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China
2
National Engineering Laboratory for Construction Technology of High-Speed Railway, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China
3
Shandong Provincial Communications Planning and Design Institute Group Co., Ltd., Jinan 250101, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(18), 10006; https://doi.org/10.3390/app151810006 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 14 August 2025 / Revised: 5 September 2025 / Accepted: 10 September 2025 / Published: 12 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Civil Engineering)

Abstract

Manual inspection methods traditionally used for tunnel lining leakage suffer from high subjectivity and low efficiency. At the same time, existing detection models do not perform well in terms of accuracy when faced with complex scenarios; this makes it essential to develop an intelligent leakage identification model that can adjust to varying background conditions. This study integrates a Vision Transformer (ViT) into UNet and constructs CBAM-TransUNet by embedding CBAMs into skip connections between the encoder-decoder structure and ViT outputs. Ablation experiments validate the efficacy of the CBAM and the ViT, while Score-CAM heatmaps analyze the model’s attention mechanism toward leakage features. The research results are as follows: (1) CBAM-TransUNet achieves average performance across metrics: 0.8143 (IoU), 0.8433 (Dice), 0.9518 (recall), 0.8482 (precision), 0.9837 (accuracy),0.9746 (AUC), 0.8568 (MCC), and 0.8970 (F1-score). These results indicate that the model performs excellently, even with dent shadows, stain interference, or faint traces. (2) Ablation experiments validate the pivotal roles of the CBAM and the ViT module: the IoU of the baseline model is 6.10% higher than that of the variant without the CBAM and 7.79% higher than that of the variant with both modules removed. (3) Through Score-CAM heatmap analysis, it is observed that the CBAM broadens the model’s attention coverage over leakage regions, strengthens feature continuity, and consequently enhances the model’s anti-interference performance in complex environments. This research could provide valuable reference insights for related fields.
Keywords: image recognition; semantic segmentation; tunnel engineering; secondary lining; water leakage; Vision Transformer; convolutional block attention module image recognition; semantic segmentation; tunnel engineering; secondary lining; water leakage; Vision Transformer; convolutional block attention module

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, Z.; Wan, L.; Wu, Y.; Song, R.; Shao, S.; Wu, H. A Tunnel Secondary Lining Leakage Recognition Model Based on an Improved TransUNet. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 10006. https://doi.org/10.3390/app151810006

AMA Style

Li Z, Wan L, Wu Y, Song R, Shao S, Wu H. A Tunnel Secondary Lining Leakage Recognition Model Based on an Improved TransUNet. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(18):10006. https://doi.org/10.3390/app151810006

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Zelong, Li Wan, Yimin Wu, Renjie Song, Shuai Shao, and Haiping Wu. 2025. "A Tunnel Secondary Lining Leakage Recognition Model Based on an Improved TransUNet" Applied Sciences 15, no. 18: 10006. https://doi.org/10.3390/app151810006

APA Style

Li, Z., Wan, L., Wu, Y., Song, R., Shao, S., & Wu, H. (2025). A Tunnel Secondary Lining Leakage Recognition Model Based on an Improved TransUNet. Applied Sciences, 15(18), 10006. https://doi.org/10.3390/app151810006

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop