Next Article in Journal
Research on the Application of Laser Ablation in the Rapid Detection of Ablation Resistance on the Surface of AgNi Contact Materials
Previous Article in Journal
Latent Mamba-DQN: Improving Temporal Dependency Modeling in Deep Q-Learning via Selective State Summarization
Previous Article in Special Issue
Research on Screening Method of Loess Slope Stability Evaluation Indexes Based on Validity and Reliability Coefficient
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Advances in Numerical Computation and Mathematical Modeling for Geotechnical Engineering

1
School of Resources, Environment and Safety Engineering, University of South China, Hengyang 421001, China
2
Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
3
School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
4
College of Energy and Mining Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(16), 8960; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15168960 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 2 August 2025 / Revised: 10 August 2025 / Accepted: 11 August 2025 / Published: 14 August 2025

1. Introduction

The field of geotechnical engineering is experiencing a transformative period driven by the increasing complexity of in situ projects and the need for operations in challenging geological environments [1,2,3,4]. As engineering activities extend into deeper strata and more complex geological conditions, practitioners face unprecedented challenges, including groundwater seepage control, dynamic rock mass failure analysis, geothermal effects on rock stability, and microseismic monitoring [5,6,7,8,9]. These multifaceted problems demand sophisticated numerical computation, mathematical modeling, and engineering monitoring methodologies that can provide reliable solutions for analysis, evaluation, and design processes [10,11].
This Special Issue, “Advances in Numerical Computation and Mathematical Modeling for Geotechnical Engineering”, addresses the critical need for advanced computational tools in geotechnical engineering practice. The collection focuses on the development and application of cutting-edge numerical computation and modeling methods for geotechnical monitoring, analysis, and theoretical prediction. By assembling high-quality original research papers, comprehensive case studies, and innovative methodological contributions, this Special Issue aims to bridge the gap between fundamental mathematical theories and practical computer-based applications in geotechnical engineering.
The rapid pace of global urbanization and infrastructure development has generated an unprecedented demand for reliable geotechnical solutions [12]. Modern projects such as deep excavations for underground transportation systems, high-rise building foundations in challenging soil conditions, and the exploitation of deep mineral resources all require accurate prediction of ground behavior under complex, multi-axial loading conditions. While traditional empirical methods remain valuable, they often prove inadequate when addressing the multi-physics nature of contemporary geotechnical problems, which involve coupled processes, material heterogeneity, and time-dependent behavior [13,14].
Recent advances in computational power and numerical algorithms have revolutionized our understanding and predictive capabilities in geotechnical behavior analysis. The development of sophisticated constitutive models capable of capturing complex stress–strain relationships in soils and rocks, combined with advanced numerical methods including the Finite Element Method (FEM), Discrete Element Method (DEM), and innovative hybrid approaches, has fundamentally transformed our analytical capabilities [10,11,15,16,17,18]. These computational tools enable engineers to comprehensively consider previously intractable factors, such as material heterogeneity, non-linear behavior, time-dependent effects, and complex coupled processes.

2. An Overview of Published Articles

This Special Issue encompasses a comprehensive range of research topics that reflect the current frontiers and emerging trends in computational geotechnics. These contributions can be categorized into several key thematic areas that collectively advance the state-of-the-art in numerical modeling and mathematical analysis.
Zhang et al. [19] utilized laboratory experiments and the Universal Distinct Element Code (UDEC) to explore the influence of the compressive strength of joint walls on the shear deformation behavior of rock discontinuities. The numerical results demonstrated good consistency with the experimental findings. At the microscopic level, the study revealed that roughness and normal stress are the main factors influencing the shear dilation process of discontinuities, and parameters such as dilation magnitude and shear strength are constrained by joint wall strength.
The application of advanced mathematical models in geotechnical engineering represents a mature yet continuously evolving field that successfully bridges theoretical analysis and practical engineering applications [20]. Liao et al. [21] proposed an innovative comprehensive evaluation methodology that integrates an improved grey correlation–Delphi model with validity and reliability coefficients. This sophisticated approach is specifically designed to address the inherent challenges in both quantitative and qualitative evaluation of loess slope stability—a critical issue in many regions worldwide where loess deposits are prevalent. The proposed method effectively overcomes the subjective dependence and index selection redundancy that characterize traditional evaluation approaches, demonstrating high reliability and providing a valuable mathematical framework for comprehensive geological slope assessment. This contribution is particularly significant given the increasing frequency of slope failures in loess regions and the need for more objective, scientifically based evaluation tools.
The integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning techniques with traditional numerical methods represents one of the most exciting and rapidly developing areas in computational geotechnics [22,23,24,25]. Sui, et al. [26] introduced a groundbreaking artificial intelligence algorithm based on a stacking integration strategy for predicting fragmentation size in open-pit bench blasting operations. This innovative AI algorithm effectively integrates Random Forest and XGBoost models, achieving significantly higher predictive accuracy compared to traditional single machine learning approaches. The research demonstrates the potential of ensemble learning methods in addressing complex geotechnical prediction problems where multiple variables and non-linear relationships are involved. This work has direct applications in mining engineering, where accurate prediction of blast fragmentation is crucial for optimizing extraction processes and minimizing environmental impact.

3. Conclusions

This Special Issue represents a significant contribution to the field of computational geotechnics, showcasing innovative research that addresses both fundamental scientific questions and practical engineering challenges. These papers presented here demonstrate the power of numerical computation and mathematical modeling in solving complex geotechnical problems, from the microscale behavior of soil particles to the large-scale response of geological systems. As we face increasingly complex engineering challenges in an era of climate change and sustainable development, the role of advanced computational methods in geotechnical engineering will only grow in importance. The research presented in this Special Issue provides the foundation for future developments, offering novel tools and insights that will enable engineers to design safer, more efficient, and more sustainable geotechnical solutions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.Q.; writing—original draft preparation, J.Q. and C.Z.; writing—review and editing, Y.R. and F.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52304091, 52374095) and the Shandong Province Youth Innovation Team Science and Technology Support Program for Higher Education Institutions (2024KJH068).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Im, K.; Saffer, D.; Marone, C.; Avouac, J.P. Slip-rate-dependent friction as a universal mechanism for slow slip events. Nat. Geosci. 2020, 13, 705–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Juang, C.H.; Gong, W.; Martin, J.R.; Chen, Q. Model selection in geological and geotechnical engineering in the face of uncertainty—Does a complex model always outperform a simple model? Eng. Geol. 2018, 242, 184–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Meng, W.; Wu, W. Machine Learning-Aided Prediction of the Mechanical Properties of Frozen Fractured Rocks. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 2023, 56, 261–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhou, C.; Rui, Y.; Qiu, J.; Wang, Z.; Zhou, T.; Long, X.; Shan, K. The role of fracture in dynamic tensile responses of fractured rock mass: Insight from a particle-based model. Int. J. Coal Sci. Technol. 2025, 12, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Li, Y.; Dai, X.; Yang, R.; Zhu, Y.; Li, R.; Zhou, C.; Xie, L.; Li, W. Failure Mechanism and Support Technology of Weakly Cemented Soft Rock Roadway in Water-Rich Environment. Geotech. Geol. Eng. 2025, 43, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hu, J.; Xie, H.; Li, C.; Liu, G. Evolution mechanism of permeability of hot dry rock under coupled effect of thermal fatigue and seawater interaction during coastal geothermal development. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2024, 189, 114061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hu, J.; Xie, H.; Gao, M.; Li, C.; Sun, Q. Damage mechanism and heat transfer characteristics of limestone after thermal shock cycle treatments based on geothermal development. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 2022, 160, 105269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rutqvist, J. The geomechanics of CO2 storage in deep sedimentary formations. Geotech. Geol. Eng. 2012, 30, 525–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Griffiths, L.; Lengliné, O.; Heap, M.J.; Baud, P.; Schmittbuhl, J. Thermal Cracking in Westerly Granite Monitored Using Direct Wave Velocity, Coda Wave Interferometry, and Acoustic Emissions. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 2018, 123, 2246–2261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jing, L. A review of techniques, advances and outstanding issues in numerical modelling for rock mechanics and rock engineering. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 2003, 40, 283–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lisjak, A.; Grasselli, G. A review of discrete modeling techniques for fracturing processes in discontinuous rock masses. J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 2014, 6, 301–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ranjith, P.G.; Zhao, J.; Ju, M.; De Silva, R.V.S.; Rathnaweera, T.D.; Bandara, A.K.M.S. Opportunities and Challenges in Deep Mining: A Brief Review. Engineering 2017, 3, 546–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mas Ivars, D.; Pierce, M.; Darcel, C.; Reyes-Montes, J.; Potyondy, D.; Young, R.; Cundall, P. The synthetic rock mass approach for jointed rock mass modelling. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 2011, 48, 219–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liu, J.; Feng, Y.; Jiao, Y. The Phlogiston Theory of Rock Mass Classification: Philosophical and Mathematical Critique of Ordinal Data Usage. Rock Mech. Bull. 2025, 4, 100205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Qiu, J.; Huang, R.; Wang, H.; Wang, F.; Zhou, C. Rate-dependent tensile behaviors of jointed rock masses considering geological conditions using a combined BPM-DFN model: Strength, fragmentation and failure modes. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 2025, 195, 109393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Saadat, M.; Taheri, A. A numerical approach to investigate the effects of rock texture on the damage and crack propagation of a pre-cracked granite. Comput. Geotech. 2019, 111, 89–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shen, Z.; Jiang, M.; Fang, N.; Zhou, F. A damage evolution law enriched by microscopic mechanisms for structured sand in mechanical loading. Acta Geotech. 2019, 14, 1905–1924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yin, Y.; Song, M.; Feng, Y.; Liu, Z.; Chen, X.; Sun, Q. Theoretical and numerical investigation of the effects of in-situ stresses and dual-borehole combinations in eccentric decoupled charge blasting. Rock Mech. Bull. 2025, 4, 100191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, X.; Ouyang, S.; Fan, C.; Yi, L.; Liu, D. Shear Properties and Failure Mechanism of Matched Discontinuities Between Two Different Rock Types Under Direct Shear. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 5289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Langenfeld, K.; Mosler, J. A micromorphic approach for gradient-enhanced anisotropic ductile damage. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 2019, 357, 112717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liao, J.; Sun, H.; An, J. Research on Screening Method of Loess Slope Stability Evaluation Indexes Based on Validity and Reliability Coefficient. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 6216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wessels, H.; Weißenfels, C.; Wriggers, P. The neural particle method—An updated Lagrangian physics informed neural network for computational fluid dynamics. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 2020, 368, 113127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Singh, J.; Pradhan, S.P.; Vishal, V.; Singh, M. Characterization of a fractured rock mass using geological strength index: A discrete fracture network approach. Transp. Geotech. 2023, 40, 100984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, L.; Song, Z.; Li, X. Artificial intelligence in tunnel construction: A comprehensive review of hotspots and frontier topics. Geohazard Mech. 2024, 2, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Konurin, A.; Sergey, N.; Alexandr, N.; Dmitry, O.; Ivan, Z.; Maria, K. Application of artificial neural networks for stress state analysis based on the photoelastic method. Geohazard Mech. 2023, 1, 128–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sui, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Zhao, R.; Yang, Z.; Zou, Y. Open-Pit Bench Blasting Fragmentation Prediction Based on Stacking Integrated Strategy. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Qiu, J.; Zhou, C.; Rui, Y.; Feng, F. Advances in Numerical Computation and Mathematical Modeling for Geotechnical Engineering. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 8960. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15168960

AMA Style

Qiu J, Zhou C, Rui Y, Feng F. Advances in Numerical Computation and Mathematical Modeling for Geotechnical Engineering. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(16):8960. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15168960

Chicago/Turabian Style

Qiu, Jiadong, Changtai Zhou, Yichao Rui, and Fan Feng. 2025. "Advances in Numerical Computation and Mathematical Modeling for Geotechnical Engineering" Applied Sciences 15, no. 16: 8960. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15168960

APA Style

Qiu, J., Zhou, C., Rui, Y., & Feng, F. (2025). Advances in Numerical Computation and Mathematical Modeling for Geotechnical Engineering. Applied Sciences, 15(16), 8960. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15168960

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop