Next Article in Journal
Importance of Using Modern Regression Analysis for Response Surface Models in Science and Technology
Previous Article in Journal
The Design, Creation, Implementation, and Study of a New Dataset Suitable for Non-Intrusive Load Monitoring
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Adsorption of Ibuprofen from Water Using Waste from Rose Geranium (Pelargonium graveolens) Stems

by
Ntaote David Shooto
* and
Patience Mapule Thabede
Natural Sciences Department, Vaal University of Technology, P.O. Box X021, Vanderbijlpark 1900, South Africa
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(13), 7203; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15137203
Submission received: 17 March 2025 / Revised: 4 June 2025 / Accepted: 6 June 2025 / Published: 26 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Surface Sciences and Technology)

Abstract

Rose geranium is widely used for oil extraction and in the food, perfume, and pharmaceutical industries. The waste produced after oil extraction has no alternative use and is usually dumped into the environment, causing pollution. This study aimed to use waste rose geranium stems (SPG) as a potential adsorbent for ibuprofen from water. The adsorbent was characterised by SEM-EDX, FTIR, TGA, and BET. The SEM images showed that the adsorbent had a rough surface with voids and pores. Different functional groups were detected on the surface of SPG with FTIR. The trend of IBU adsorption showed that the adsorption capacity increases when the initial concentration of working standards is increased. The data for the contact time effect show that the adsorption rate was fast in the initial stage between 1 and 45 min. Afterward, a slow adsorption rate occurred between 65 and 105 min. The kinetic data corresponded to the Langmuir and pseudo-first-order (PFO) models. The highest recorded IBU uptake was 34.88 mg/g. The ΔHo value shows that the adsorption of IBU on SPG was controlled by physisorption. The obtained values of ΔGo are negative, indicating that the uptake of IBU was spontaneous.

1. Introduction

The widespread and extensive use of pharmaceutical products, while being beneficial, has also led to environmental problems worldwide and has been detected in soil, municipal sewage systems, and surface water [1]. Pharmaceuticals include a wide range of compounds such as anti-inflammatory drugs, antiretrovirals (ARVs), vaccines, steroids, painkillers, etc. [2].
Ibuprofen (IBU), 2-[4-(2-methylpropyl) phynyl] propanoic acid (C13H18O2), is a well-known commonly used drug, with an annual consumption of more than 2 million tons. It is non-steroidal and anti-inflammatory and is usually prescribed to relieve inflammation, osteoarthritis, and rheumatoid arthritis. It is also an analgesic and mixed with other medicines to relieve fever and pain [3,4]. IBU cannot be fully metabolised in the human digestive system, and its derivatives are released from the human body through natural processes such as urination and defecation and eventually leached into the water. Prolonged intake of water containing IBU or its derivatives leads to bioaccumulation and has toxic effects on the environment, human health, and aquatic organisms [5]. Several studies have reported that the concentration of IBU is increasing in rivers and wastewater treatment plants in many countries, posing serious health and environmental risks. IBU originates from the wastewater of pharmaceutical product manufacturers, hospital effluents, the improper disposal of expired medications, the excreta of patients taking medication, and animal husbandry [6].
The adverse effects of IBU necessitate its removal from the environment and water. Several treatment methods, including precipitation, coagulation, ion exchange, filtration, advanced oxidation [7], etc., were developed to remove pollutants from aqueous solutions. Adsorption is one of the favoured methods because it is inexpensive and effective, does not use harmful chemicals, and produces no sludge [8]. The versatility of adsorption is demonstrated by the possibility of using different materials, such as activated carbon [9], agricultural waste, zeolites [10], etc., as adsorbents.
Agricultural waste materials are economical and abundant in nature. These include pomegranate peels, papaya seeds, coconut shells and spend green tea [11], fennel seeds, hemp seeds, twigs and roots, avocado seeds, paper waste, black cumin seeds, etc. These natural materials have active sites such as oxygen-rich functional groups on their surface that can effectively bind pollutants and a porous surface that can trap pollutant molecules in water [12,13,14,15,16,17].
Rose geranium is a bushy, evergreen plant that is native to South Africa and is also found in many countries worldwide. Its unique essential oil, contained in the leaves, flowers, and stems of the plant, contains compounds such as geranial, linalool, etc [11]. The oil is highly commercialised and used in the food industry for flavouring and preservation, the pharmaceutical industry for its antibacterial and antifungal properties, and the perfume industry. After the oil is extracted from the plants, tons of waste are produced, which usually end up in the environment without any alternative use. To the best of our ability, we located a single document that reports on the use of carbon from rose geranium leaves activated by phosphoric acid (H3PO4) for the removal of ibuprofen from water. The great potential of using geranium leaves as an adsorbent in water purification provides a good basis for using other parts of geranium.
This research creates an alternative use for waste rose geranium stems by using them as adsorbent to remove IBU from water. In this study, we characterised the adsorbent and carried out the adsorption of ibuprofen by varying influential parameters such as initial concentration, pH of the solution, temperature of the system, and contact time.

2. Materials and Preparation

2.1. Materials

The stems of Pelargonium graveolens were obtained from Sebokeng, Gauteng, South Africa. Ibuprofen (C13H18O2) ≥ 98%, hydrochloric acid (HCl) ≥ 37%, potassium nitrate (KNO3) ≥ 99%, ethanol (C2H5OH) ≥ 99.5%, and sodium hydroxide (NaOH) ≥ 98% were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (Johannesburg, South Africa).

2.2. Experiments

2.2.1. Preparation of Pelargonium Graveolens

The stems of Pelargonium graveolens were ground to powder using a heavy-duty grinder. Exactly 10 g of material was transferred to a 500 mL beaker containing distilled water to remove dirt. Thereafter, the material was dried in an oven at 45 °C for 12 h. A mesh sieve was used to collect particles of 500 μm, and the material was labelled SPG.

2.2.2. Preparation of Stock Solution and Working Standards

Ibuprofen stock solution (125 mg/L) was prepared by dissolving the salt in a mixture of ethanol/water in a 1 L volumetric flask. The stock solution was diluted to prepare working standards of 25, 50, 75, 100, and 125 mg/L in 200 mL volumetric flasks.

2.2.3. Adsorption Experiments

The adsorption experiments used a mass of 0.2 g of the adsorbent (SPG) and a volume of 20 mL of IBU solutions at a temperature 35 °C, agitated at 200 rpm for 105 min unless otherwise stated. The initial concentration effect was tested using IBU working standard solutions of 25, 50, 75, 100, and 125 mg/L. The contact time effect was investigated between 1 and 105 min using an IBU solution of 125 mg/L. The temperature effect was investigated between 25, 30, 35, 40 and 45 °C using the IBU standard of 125 mg/L for 105 min. The effect of pH was examined at pH 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 with an IBU solution of 125 mg/L. The adsorption experiments were carried out in triplicate to ensure repeatability.

2.2.4. Point Zero Charge

The experiment was carried out by transferring 50 mL of 0.01 M KNO3 solution into ten capped bottles. The initial pH of the solutions in the bottles was adjusted to different pH values between 1 and 10. Exactly 0.1 g of SPG material was added into all the bottles and stirred for 48 h. Thereafter, the final pH was measured. The ΔpH was determined by subtracting the final pH from the initial pH. The obtained ΔpH values were plotted against initial pH values and the intercept point was determined as pH(PZC).

2.2.5. Reusability

The reusability of SPG was determined by reusing the adsorbent loaded with IBU. The adsorbent was added to 20 mL of a 0.1 M HCl solution and shaken at 200 rpm for 30 min to desorb IBU. The SPG was then rinsed with ultrapure water for 30 min.

2.3. Analytical Methods

SEM coupled with EDX (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to characterise the surface morphology and the elemental constituents of the adsorbent. FTIR (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to identify the functional groups on the surface of the adsorbent. The TGA 4000 thermogravimetric analyser (Thermo Fisher) was used to determine the thermal stability of the adsorbent under nitrogen atmosphere between 30 and 900 °C. Nitrogen adsorption–desorption studies were investigated using the Micromeritics Tristar II 3020, after degassing the sample at 40 °C. A UV-visible spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used to confirm the concentration of IBU in the solution before and after adsorption, with the wavelength set at 223 nm.

2.4. Data Management

The adsorption capacity, qe (mg/g) of IBU by SPG was calculated using Equation (1).
q e = C o C e   V W
Other equations used are shown in the Supplementary Materials.

3. Characterisation

3.1. FTIR Analysis

The FTIR spectrum for SPG shown in Figure 1 indicates several characteristic peaks. The peaks are located at wavenumbers 3296 and 2919 and 2834, 1728, and 1604 and between 1065 and 1027 cm−1. The broad peak at 3296 cm−1 corresponds to (−OH) in lignocellulose, peaks at 2919 and 2834 cm−1 are attributed to aliphatic (−CH) groups; other sharp peaks at 1728 and 1604 cm−1 correspond to carbonyl (−C=O) and amine (−NH), respectively, while the peak between 1065 and 1027 cm−1 is assigned to the cellulose group (−COC). Similar peaks were observed for rose geranium leaves. It is expected that the oxygen-containing groups influence the adsorption process.

3.2. SEM-EDX Analysis

The SEM images of SPG depicted in Figure 2a–e show two-dimensional particles that are amorphous without any uniform sizes and shapes. The particles have a rough surface texture with wrinkles (Figure 2b,c) and some have openings and pores (Figure 2d). It is assumed that these properties play an important role in adsorption. A similar observation was made when rose geranium leaves were carbonised. EDX analysis (Table 1) showed C and O as major elements with trace amounts of heteroatoms.

3.3. Thermogravimetric Analysis

The thermal stability of SPG was monitored and the profile shown in Figure 3 shows two stages of decomposition. The first decomposition between 32 and 180 °C is minimal and is due to the loss of moisture; a mass loss of about 7% was observed [18]. The second decomposition between 180 and 510 °C is more significant and is due to the degradation of lignocellulosic material, with a mass loss of 52% observed [19]. Thereafter, between 510 and 900 °C, pyrolysis of the residues occurred and about 35% weight loss indicates that SPG is thermally stable.

3.4. BET Analysis

The surface area and average pore diameter of the adsorbent were measured by BET spectroscopy (Figure 4a,b). The analysis for N2 adsorption and desorption BET surface area for SPG is 3.527 m2/g (Figure 4a), and the adsorbent has mesopores with an average pore diameter of 3.796 nm (Figure 4b).

3.5. Adsorption Results

3.5.1. Time Effect of SPG and Kinetic Models

The adsorption of IBU was studied at intervals of 1–105 min to understand the rate of uptake (Figure 5). It was found that the adsorption rate in the initial phase between 1 and 45 min was rapid. This is due to the interaction between IBU and the active sites such as functional groups containing oxygen, rough texture, pores, and voids on the surface of SPG [20]. Subsequently, a slow adsorption rate occurred, resulting in little to no adsorption in time intervals of 65–105 min. This is attributed to the progressive saturation of the active sites, which limits the adsorption rate and leads to equilibrium [21].
The data on the time effect were recorded and fitted to two known kinetic models, which are listed in Table 2. This was to test the model best suited to the data. Pseudo-first-order (PFO) and pseudo-second-order (PSO) kinetic models are based on physisorption and chemisorption, respectively [22]. The selection criterion is based on the comparison of the correlation coefficient (r2), which is closest to 1. The review shows that PFO has an r2 value closer to 1. This indicates that the data fit PFO rather than PSO. The uptake of IBU on SPG is mainly through physisorption driven by weak van der Waals forces [23]. The model also predicted a Qo value closer to the experimental qe. The intra-particle diffusion (IPD) kinetic model-estimated pore adsorption (EPA) was 23.44%, and the estimated surface adsorption (ESA) was 76.56%.

3.5.2. Temperature Effect and Thermodynamics of SPG

The removal of IBU was studied at different temperatures to evaluate the effect on uptake. The temperature effect was studied between 25 and 45 °C, and the graph is shown in Figure 6. The removal of IBU increased significantly between 25 and 35 °C, showing that uptake favours an endothermic system [24]. However, the removal decreased slightly between 35 and 45 °C, indicating an exothermic nature and that a higher temperature was unfavourable for uptake. This is due to the IBU molecules gaining kinetic energy in the solution, resulting in higher mobility and reduced uptake [25].
The temperature effect data were used to determine the thermodynamic parameters, which are listed in Table 3. The values for ΔHo were between 25 and 35 °C endothermic and between 35 and 45 °C exothermic. When the value of ΔHo is in the range of 0 and −20 KJ/mol, the reaction is physisorption, while ΔHo between −80 and −400 KJ/mol means chemisorption [26]. The ΔHo value shows that the adsorption of IBU on SPG was controlled by physisorption due to weak van der Waals forces. The obtained values of ΔGo are negative, indicating that the uptake of IBU was spontaneous. The value of ΔSo is positive, indicating that there was increased freedom when equilibrium was reached.

3.5.3. Concentration Effect and Isotherm Models for SPG

The concentration effect was investigated using working standards with an initial concentration between 25 and 125 mg/L (Figure 7). The trends for IBU adsorption show that adsorption capacity increases when the initial concentration of the working standards is increased. The increase was recorded for standards between 25 and 100 mg/L. Thereafter, for standards with a concentration between 100 and 125 mg/L, no significant adsorption was recorded. This indicates that the active sites and binding points on SPG were saturated [27]. The mass transfer was limited and resulted in reduced uptake for the working standard of 125 mg/L.
The equilibrium data were fitted to the isotherm models (Table 4) to investigate the appropriate model and determine the interaction between SPG and IBU. Langmuir and Freundlich models are based on single-layer and multilayer adsorption, respectively [28]. The selection of the appropriate model is based on the comparison of the (r2) values closest to 1. Table 4 shows that Langmuir has an r2 value closer to 1 than the Freundlich model, indicating that the equilibrium data follow Langmuir’s isotherm model. This suggests that uptake occurs on the surface of SPG, with the active sites having the same affinity for IBU [29]. The statistical error analysis was calculated to evaluate the most effective model by determining Marquart’s percentage standard deviation (MPSD) and root mean square error (RMSE). The values obtained for MPSD and RMSE are 2.32 and 3.68 for Langmuir, respectively. The Freundlich model showed greater errors with an MPSD value of 17.69 and an RMSE value of 22.57. The Langmuir model showed lower error values for the adsorption of ibuprofen on SPG.

3.5.4. pH Effect of SPG

The influence of the pH value of the IBU solution was measured in the pH range of 1–9 (Figure 8). The trend shows that the removal was low at solution pH 1 and 3. Under these conditions, the pH of the solution is lower than the pKa of IBU, resulting in IBU being present as a neutral molecule [30]. This restricted uptake and limited the interaction between SPG and IBU. However, the removal improved when the pH of the solution was adjusted to 5, which was due to the coexistence of IBU as a neutral and anionic species [5]. This improved electrostatic interaction and increased removal. The highest removal was observed under pH 7, with an uptake of 29.71 mg/g. This is because under these conditions, IBU molecule uptake was enhanced by electrostatic attraction between IBU present in the solution as an anion and SPG [31]. However, at pH 9, the capacity slightly decreased to 29.30 mg/g, due to enhanced electrostatic repulsion between negatively charged IBU molecules and the adsorbent surface. Under these conditions, adsorption could have occurred through other mechanisms.

3.5.5. pH(PZC) of SPG

To determine the neutral state of SPG. pH(PZC) was determined by plotting ΔpH against the initial pH, as shown in Figure 9. It was found that the pH(PZC) value for SPG is 4.4. At this value, the material is not charged or neutral. This indicates that SPG acquires a positive charge at initial pH values below pH(PZC) (i.e., from 1 to 4.3). However, at initial pH values above pH(PZC) for SPG 4.5 and above, the SPG acquired a negative charge.

3.5.6. Reusability Study of SPG

The reusability of the material was determined by the regeneration and reuse of SPG in up to four cycles (Figure 10). It was observed that the material had the highest percentage uptake during initial use—this is attributed to the abundance of active sites and binding points on SPG. Thereafter, the material gradually lost its adsorption capacity after each cycle, which is due to the inability of SPG to desorb and release IBU, resulting in a lower percentage of adsorption and capacity uptake.

3.5.7. Comparative Study

The adsorption capacity achieved for SPG was compared to similar adsorbents, as shown in Table 5. SPG waste is inexpensive but performs better than other adsorbents, demonstrating its potential for water treatment. SPG has a rough surface texture with voids and pores on the surface and abundant active sites, which may have contributed to the high adsorption capacity.

4. Conclusions

In this study, the stem of rose geranium was used as an adsorbent for ibuprofen. The material was characterised by SEM-EDX, FTIR, TGA, and BET. The SEM images showed that the morphology of the SPG exhibited a rough surface texture with voids and pores. The FTIR spectrum showed the presence of groups such as −OH, −C=O, −COC, and −NH on the surface of the adsorbent. The chemical and physical properties of SPG played an important role in the removal of IBU. IBU was found to be present as a neutral molecule in the solution at pH 1 and 3, limiting the interaction and resulting in low uptake. At pH 5, IBU was slightly ionised and coexisted as a neutral and anionic species. Under alkaline conditions at pH 7, IBU was completely ionised and existed as an anion, which improved removal. The trend of IBU adsorption showed that the adsorption capacity increases when the initial concentration of working standards is increased. The data for the time effect showed that the adsorption rate was fast in the initial phase between 1 and 45 min. This was followed by a slow adsorption rate leading to little to no adsorption in time intervals between 65 and 105 min. The data corresponded to the Langmuir and PFO models. The ΔHo value shows that the adsorption of IBU on SPG was controlled by physisorption due to weak van der Waals forces. The obtained values of ΔGo are negative, indicating that the uptake of IBU was spontaneous. The reusability of SPG showed good uptake for three cycles with an efficiency of more than 65%; thereafter, the adsorbent showed limited efficiency. Overall, the results for low-cost SPG show great potential and feasibility for water treatment. Future research for SPG includes carbonization at different temperatures using various techniques such as furnace, microwave, and hydrothermal energy, followed by carbon activation with acids and bases. Such materials should also be investigated for the adsorption of other emerging pollutants.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/app15137203/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.D.S. and P.M.T.; methodology, P.M.T.; validation, N.D.S. and P.M.T.; formal analysis, P.M.T.; investigation, P.M.T.; resources, P.M.T.; data curation, P.M.T.; writing—original draft preparation, N.D.S. and P.M.T.; writing—review and editing, N.D.S.; visualization, N.D.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Vaal University of Technology, Vanderbijlpark, South Africa, funded this work.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Munzhelele, E.P.; Mudzielwana, R.; Ayinde, W.B.; Gitari, W.M. Bodies of South Africa: A Review of Sources, Pathways, Occurrence, Effects, and Geographical Distribution. Water 2024, 16, 796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sigonya, S.; Mokhotu, T.H.; Mokhena, T.C.; Makhanya, T.R. Mitigation of Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory and Antiretroviral Drugs as Environmental Pollutants by Adsorption Using Nanomaterials as Viable Solution—A Critical Review. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yang, Z.; Zhang, H.; Zheng, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Cui, Y. Direct activation of petroleum pitch-based mesoporous carbon for phenol adsorption. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2024, 702, 135020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhang, T.; Zhang, X.; Li, H. Kinetics and equilibrium study of phenol adsorption by activated carbon derived from pig blood. Carbon Trends 2023, 12, 100281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Osman, A.L.; Ayati, A.; Farghali, M.; Krivosshapkin, P.; Tanhaei, B.; Karimi-Maleh, H.; Krivoshapkina, E.; Taheri, P.; Tracey, C.; Al-Fatesh, A.; et al. Advanced adsorbents for ibuprofen removal from aquatic environments: A review. Environ. Chem. Letter. 2024, 22, 373–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Samal, K.; Mahapatra, S.; Ali, M.H. Pharmaceutical wastewater as emerging contaminants (EC): Treatment technologies, impact on environment and human health. Energy Nexus 2022, 6, 100076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rogowska, J.; Zimmermann, A. Household Pharmaceutical Waste Disposal as a Global Problem—A Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 15798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Satyam, S.; Patra, S. Innovations and challenges in adsorption-based wastewater remediation: A comprehensive review. Heliyon 2024, 10, 29573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gokce, Y.; Aktas, Z. Nitric acid modification of activated carbon produced from waste tea and adsorption of methylene blue and phenol. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 313, 352–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Velarde, L.; Nabavi, M.S.; Escalera, E.; Antti, M.L.; Akhtar, F. Adsorption of heavy metals on natural zeolites: A review. Chemosphere 2023, 328, 138508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Duwiejuah, A.B.; Adjei, E.F. Alhassan EH. Adsorption of toxic metals from greywater using coconut husk biochar and spent green tea. Heliyon 2024, 10, 38189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Fayoumi, L.; Khalil, M.; Ghareeb, D.; Chokr, A.; Bouaziz, M.; El-Dakdouki, M.H. Phytochemical constituents and therapeutic effects of the essential oil of rose geranium (Pelargonium hybrid) cultivated in Lebanon. S. Afr. J. Botany 2022, 147, 894–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Thillainayagam, B.P.; Saravanan, P.; Ravindiran, G.; Josephraj, J. Continuous sorption of methylene blue dye from aqueous solution using effective microorganisms-based water hyacinth waste compost in a packed column. Biomass Convers. Biorefinery 2023, 13, 1189–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Boukhatem, N.M.; Kameli, A.; Ferhat, M.A.; Saidi, F.; Mekarnia, M. Rose geranium essential oil as a source of new and safe anti-inflammatory drugs. Libyan J. Med. 2013, 7, 22520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Carmen, G.; Hnncu, G. Antimicrobial and Antifungal Activity of Pelargonium roseum Essential Oils. Adv. Pharm. Bull. 2014, 31, 511–514. [Google Scholar]
  16. Jia, Z.; Li, Z.; Ni, T.; Li, S. Adsorption of low-cost absorption materials based on biomass (Cortaderia selloana flower spikes) for dye removal: Kinetics, isotherms and thermodynamic studies. J. Mol. Liq. 2017, 229, 285–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mane, P.V.; Rego, R.M.; Yap, P.L.; Losic, D.; Kurkuri, M.D. Unveiling cutting-edge advances in high surface area porous materials for the efficient removal of toxic metal ions from water. Prog. Mat. Sci. 2024, 146, 101314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shen, D.K.; Gu, S. The mechanism for thermal decomposition of cellulose and its main products. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 6496–6504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ornaghi, H.L.; Ornaghi, F.G.; Neves, R.M.; Monticeli, F.; Bianchi, O. Mechanisms involved in thermal degradation of lignocellulosic fibers: A survey based on chemical composition. Cellulose 2020, 27, 4949–4961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Adebayo, G.B.; Jamiu, W.; Okoro, H.K.; Okeola, F.O.; Adesina, A.K.; Feyisetan, O.A. Kinetics, Thermodynamics and Isothermal Modelling of Liquid Phase Adsorption of Methylene Blue onto Moringa Pod Husk Activated Carbon. S. Afr. J. Chem. 2019, 72, 263–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Elkhaleefa, A.; Ali, I.H.; Brima, E.I.; Shigidi, I.; Elhag, A.B.; Karama, B. Evaluation of the Adsorption Efficiency on the Removal of Lead(II) Ions from Aqueous Solutions Using Azadirachta indica Leaves as an Adsorbent. Processes 2021, 9, 559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Guo, X.; Wang, J. A general kinetic model for adsorption: Theoretical analysis and modelling. J. Mol. Liq. 2019, 288, 111100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Brandani, S. Kinetics of liquid phase batch adsorption experiments. Adsorption 2021, 27, 353–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Oba, S.N.; Ighalo, J.O.; Aniagor, C.O.; Igwegbe, C.A. Removal of ibuprofen from aqueous media by adsorption: A comprehensive review. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 780, 146608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mondal, S.; Aikat, K.; Halder, G. Biosorptive uptake of ibuprofen by chemically modified Parthenium hysterophorus derived biochar: Equilibrium, kinetics, thermodynamics and modelling. Ecol. Eng. 2016, 92, 158–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sutherland, C. Adsorption of cephalexin: A decade of progress in adsorbent development and mechanistic insights. Desalin. Water Treat. 2024, 318, 100357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kamdod, A.S.; Kumar, M.V.P. Adsorption of methylene blue, methyl orange, and crystal violet on microporous coconut shell activated carbon and its composite with chitosan: Isotherms and kinetics. J. Polym. Environ. 2022, 30, 5274–5289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mahajan, T.; Paikaray, S.; Mahajan, P. Applicability of the equilibrium adsorption isotherms and the statistical tools on to them: A case study for the adsorption of fluoride onto Mg-Fe-CO3 LDH. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2023, 2603, 012056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Cozmuta, L.M.; Cozmuta, A.M.; Peter, A.; Nicula, C.; Nsimba, E.B.; Tutu, H. The influence of pH on the adsorption of lead by Na-clinoptilolite: Kinetic and equilibrium studies. Water SA 2012, 38, 269–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yamin, M.; Ghouri, Z.K.; Rohman, N.; Syed, J.A.; Skelton, A.; Ahmed, K. Unravelling pH/pKa influence on pH-responsive drug carriers: Insights from ibuprofen-silica interactions and comparative analysis with carbon nanotubes, sulfasalazine, and alendronate. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 2024, 128, 108720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ayati, A.; Tanhaei, B.; Beiki, H.; Krivoshapkin, P.; Krivoshapkina, E.; Tracey, C. Insight into the adsorptive removal of ibuprofen using porous carbonaceous materials: A review. Chemosphere 2023, 323, 138241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Labuto, G.; Carvalho, A.P.; Mestre, A.S.; dos Santos, M.S.; Modesto, H.R.; Martins, T.D.; Lemos, S.G.; da Silva, H.G.T.; Neide, E.; Carrilho, E.N.V.M.; et al. Individual and competitive adsorption of ibuprofen and caffeine from primary sewage effluent by yeast-based activated carbon and magnetic carbon nanocomposite. Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 2022, 28, 100703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Patel, M.; Chaubey, A.K.; Pittman, C.U.; Mohan, D. Aqueous ibuprofen sorption by using activated walnut shell biochar: Process optimization and cost estimation. Environ. Sci. Adv. 2022, 1, 530–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chakraborty, P.; Show, S.; Banerjee, S.; Halder, G. Mechanistic insight into sorptive elimination of ibuprofen employing bidirectional activated biochar from sugarcane bagasse: Performance evaluation and cost estimation. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 5287–5300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Baccar, R.; Sarra, M.; Bouzid, J.; Feki, M.; Blanquez, P. Removal of pharmaceutical compounds by activated carbon prepared from agricultural by-product. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 211–212, 310–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Guedidi, H.; Reinert, L.; Leveque, J.M.; Soneda, Y.; Bellakhal, N.; Duclaux, N. The effects of the surface oxidation of activated carbon, the solution pH and the temperature on adsorption of ibuprofen. Carbon 2013, 54, 432–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. FTIR spectrum of SPG.
Figure 1. FTIR spectrum of SPG.
Applsci 15 07203 g001
Figure 2. SEM images (ae) for SPG.
Figure 2. SEM images (ae) for SPG.
Applsci 15 07203 g002
Figure 3. TGA profile of SPG.
Figure 3. TGA profile of SPG.
Applsci 15 07203 g003
Figure 4. BET analysis (a) surface area and (b) average pore diameter.
Figure 4. BET analysis (a) surface area and (b) average pore diameter.
Applsci 15 07203 g004
Figure 5. Time effect on SPG for ibuprofen.
Figure 5. Time effect on SPG for ibuprofen.
Applsci 15 07203 g005
Figure 6. Temperature effect on SPG for ibuprofen.
Figure 6. Temperature effect on SPG for ibuprofen.
Applsci 15 07203 g006
Figure 7. Concentration effect on SPG for ibuprofen.
Figure 7. Concentration effect on SPG for ibuprofen.
Applsci 15 07203 g007
Figure 8. pH effect on SPG for ibuprofen.
Figure 8. pH effect on SPG for ibuprofen.
Applsci 15 07203 g008
Figure 9. pH at point zero charge on SPG for ibuprofen.
Figure 9. pH at point zero charge on SPG for ibuprofen.
Applsci 15 07203 g009
Figure 10. Reusability study on SPG for ibuprofen.
Figure 10. Reusability study on SPG for ibuprofen.
Applsci 15 07203 g010
Table 1. EDX analysis for SPG.
Table 1. EDX analysis for SPG.
EDX (Weight%)
COMgCaSClK
61.2237.830.110.280.080.140.33
Table 2. Kinetic models of SPG.
Table 2. Kinetic models of SPG.
PFOPSOIPD
Qo (mg/g)31.66qe (mg/g)27.23C (mg/g)27.23
b (L/mg)0.1021/n2.56Ki (g/g·min1/2)1.43
R20.9918kf1.007R20.8187
R20.8475EPA (%)23.44
ESA (%)76.56
Experimental (qe) (mg/g) 34.88.
Table 3. Thermodynamic parameters of SPG.
Table 3. Thermodynamic parameters of SPG.
∆Ho (KJ/mol)∆So (KJ/mol)Temperature (K)∆Go (KJ/mol)
−1 × 10−33 × 10−325−4.88
30−2.87
35−2.10
40−1.97
45−1.89
Table 4. Isotherm models of SPG.
Table 4. Isotherm models of SPG.
Langmuir Freundlich
Qo (mg/g)24.91qe (mg/g)2.4
b (L/mg)0.03671/n3.12
R20.9957kf0.053
MPSD2.32R20.8836
RMSE3.68MPSD17.69
Experimental qe (mg/g) 26.58 RMSE22.57
Table 5. Comparison study of the removal of IBU using similar materials.
Table 5. Comparison study of the removal of IBU using similar materials.
Biosorbentqe (mg/g)Reference
Carbon/magnetite NP51.00[32]
Blend carbon45.58[5]
Pomegranate husk/Fe(II)–Fe(III) NP39.80
Stem of rose geranium34.88This study
Biochar from walnut shells30.10[33]
Hemp seeds-MnO/CuO26.50[4]
Sugarcane waste13.51[34]
Carbon from olive seeds9.090[35]
Mugwort leaves6.800[36]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shooto, N.D.; Thabede, P.M. Adsorption of Ibuprofen from Water Using Waste from Rose Geranium (Pelargonium graveolens) Stems. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 7203. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15137203

AMA Style

Shooto ND, Thabede PM. Adsorption of Ibuprofen from Water Using Waste from Rose Geranium (Pelargonium graveolens) Stems. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(13):7203. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15137203

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shooto, Ntaote David, and Patience Mapule Thabede. 2025. "Adsorption of Ibuprofen from Water Using Waste from Rose Geranium (Pelargonium graveolens) Stems" Applied Sciences 15, no. 13: 7203. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15137203

APA Style

Shooto, N. D., & Thabede, P. M. (2025). Adsorption of Ibuprofen from Water Using Waste from Rose Geranium (Pelargonium graveolens) Stems. Applied Sciences, 15(13), 7203. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15137203

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop