Next Article in Journal
Thermal–Electrical Optimization of Lithium-Ion Battery Conductor Structures Under Extreme High Amperage Current
Previous Article in Journal
Digital Health Technologies to Support At-Home Recovery of People with Stroke: A Scoping Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
E-Waste Plastics in the Environment: Assessment, Characterisation, and Bioprocessing
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Combination of Nitrogen (N2) Pyrolysis and Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Activation for Regenerating Spent Activated Carbon

1
Graduate Institute of Bioresources, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Pingtung 912, Taiwan
2
Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Yunlin 640, Taiwan
3
Department of Resources Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this study.
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(10), 5336; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15105336 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 1 April 2025 / Revised: 8 May 2025 / Accepted: 9 May 2025 / Published: 10 May 2025

Abstract

:
In line with the principles of the circular economy, this study aimed to develop a pyrolysis-activation regeneration process capable of producing highly porous carbon materials from spent granular activated carbon (GAC), which was generated by a high-tech electronics manufacturing company in Taiwan. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and other thermochemical analyses were first conducted to investigate the thermal decomposition behavior of the spent GAC. Subsequently, the thermal regeneration system was employed to perform the N2 pyrolysis and CO2 activation experiments under various process conditions (i.e., 800, 850, and 900 °C for holding 0, 30, and 60 min, respectively). Analytical instruments included a surface area and porosimeter for pore property analysis, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) for porous texture observation, and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) for surface elemental distribution analysis. The results revealed that the pore properties of thermally regenerated GAC were significantly improved compared to the spent GAC, indicating the effective removal or decomposition of adsorbed organics and deposited substances under the process conditions. Additionally, thermal regeneration via physical activation with CO2 led to enhanced pore properties compared to simple pyrolysis. The maximum BET surface area achieved exceeded 720 m2/g, which was greater than those of spent GAC (approximately 425 m2/g) and N2-pyrolyzed GAC (approximately 570 m2/g) under the same regeneration conditions (i.e., 900 °C with a 30 min holding time).

1. Introduction

Activated carbons (ACs) are microporous carbon-based adsorbents characterized by their extensive pore properties (e.g., specific surface area, total pore volume), which enable significant adsorption capacities for removing contaminants from air and water streams. Commercially available AC is typically found in two forms: powdered AC (PAC) and granular AC (GAC) [1]. PAC is primarily used in wastewater and water treatment applications such as decolorization in the food processing industries and the removal of trace organics from drinking water, often generating sludge-like waste when PAC becomes exhausted in the liquid phase. In such cases, the regeneration of spent PAC becomes a challenge, and it is often disposed of without reuse. In contrast, GAC, either in granulated form or pelletized form, is widely applied in gas-phase adsorption, including organic vapor recovery, indoor air purification, gas separation, respiratory protection, and vent gas purification [2]. Given the high cost of AC and the ease of regeneration [3], spent GAC used in industrial applications can be regenerated or reactivated using various methods, which will be further addressed in the subsequent section.
Regenerating or reactivating AC offers both economic and environmental advantages, as it reduces the need for treating or disposing of spent AC. Various regeneration methods for exhausted or saturated AC have been reviewed in the literature, including thermal, chemical, biological, electrochemical, microwave, and oxidation techniques [4,5,6,7,8]. Although microwave thermal regeneration is considered a novel technique [9,10,11,12,13], conventional thermal regeneration (desorption) via pyrolysis under an inert gas (i.e., nitrogen) remains the most commonly applied method. However, one drawback of thermal regeneration is that it often fails to fully restore the original pore properties of the AC [14,15,16,17,18], thereby limiting its reuse in adsorption applications. To overcome this limitation, researchers have explored combinations of thermal and chemical oxidation methods. For instance, Álvarez et al. regenerated spent GAC at 850 °C using N2 (pyrolysis alone) as well as N2 and CO2 combined (pyrolysis plus activation) [19]. According to their results, pyrolysis alone was not able to restore the pore properties due to residual charred products remaining on the carbon surface and pores; however, using an oxidant was capable of removing adsorbed organics completely. Cho et al. also regenerated spent GAC by combining N2 pyrolysis at 500–800 °C with air activation at 600–800 °C for holding times between 0 and 60 min [20]. Although air is rarely used as an oxidant in thermal regeneration, their study suggested it may offer economic advantages due to lower energy consumption and shorter processing times. Toledo et al. evaluated regeneration using acid washing followed by thermal treatment (650–950 °C), demonstrating that acid washing prior to thermal regeneration was critical for reactivating spent GAC [21]. Nasir et al. assessed thermal regeneration of spent commercial activated carbon (SAC) by N2 pyrolysis (Pyro-RAC) and CO2 activation (CO2-RAC) [22], indicating the order of Pyro-RAC > CO2-RAC > SAC based on their specific area values. Fagbohun et al. used CO2 activation and chemical activation with K2CO3/KCl, showing that combining K2CO₃ and KCl under N2 pyrolysis conditions yielded higher pore properties compared to CO2 activation alone [23]. Márquez et al. showed that while N2 pyrolysis at 900 °C could provide the highest surface area values [24], a simpler thermal regeneration process at (<350 °C) and 1 h using an oxidizing atmosphere (air) could effectively restore most of the pore properties of exhausted GAC. Yuan et al. regenerated spent GAC using N2 pyrolysis (700–900 °C) followed by steam activation for 0.5–1.5 h [25], showing that the optimal conditions for pore property recovery of GAC were at 800 °C and 1 h.
In the previous studies [26,27], spent bleaching earth (SBE) was thermally regenerated at 500–800 °C under pyrolysis gas nitrogen (N2) and 800–900 °C under CO2 activation. Compared to untreated SBE, the regenerated material exhibited enhanced pore properties due to new pore formation from the carbonization and activation of non-desorbed organics [28]. Although regeneration of spent GAC is a well-explored topic, this work uniquely focuses on using a combination of N2 pyrolysis and CO2 activation, making it different from most prior studies. In this context, proximate analysis, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), and pore property measurements of a spent GAC from a local liquid crystal display (LCD) manufacturing plant were first determined to be used as baseline characteristics. The regeneration experiments were then performed under various conditions (i.e., 800, 850, and 900 °C with holding times of 0, 30, and 60 min, respectively), in compliance with Taiwan’s official regulation for spent GAC regeneration (i.e., ≥800 °C). The resulting pore properties (i.e., surface area, pore volume, and pore size distribution), along with textural and chemical characteristics of GAC samples (i.e., spent and regenerated GAC products), were analyzed and discussed in relation to the thermal regeneration conditions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Spent GAC

The spent AC used in this study was obtained from a liquid crystal display (LCD) manufacturing plant (Tainan City, Taiwan). The material was in cylindrical form with a particle diameter of 4 mm. Proximate analysis of the as-received sample was performed in triplicate according to the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standards method. Prior to use in thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and the pyrolysis/activation experiments, the spent GAC was pre-dried in an oven dryer at 105 °C for 12 h. To prevent the moisture sorption, the dried sample was stored in an air-circulation oven set at 60 °C.

2.2. Thermogravimetric and Elemental Analyses of Spent GAC

Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was used to determine the changes in weight of the test sample as a function of temperature. In this study, a TGA instrument (Model: TGA-51; Shimadzu Co., Tokyo, Japan) was used to analyze the thermal decomposition behavior of the dried sample (approximately 0.2 g) under an inert nitrogen atmosphere flowing at 50 cm3/min. The sample was heated from 25 to 1000 °C at a rate of 10 °C/min. Additionally, energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) conducted during scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed to obtain the elemental compositions on the surface of the spent GAC. Detailed information on the SEM-EDS instrumentation and its operating conditions is provided in Section 2.4. The SEM-EDS data were also used to compare the surface characteristics of the spent and regenerated GAC samples.

2.3. Thermal Regeneration Experiments

In this study, a vertical fixed-bed furnace was used to perform the thermal regeneration experiments with two different methods. The first method involved simple pyrolysis under N2 flow (500 mL/min), where the samples were heated at a rate of 10 °C/min up to a specified temperature (i.e., 800, 850, and 900 °C) and held for varying holding times (i.e., 0, 30, and 60 min). Approximately 5 g of the dried GAC was used for each experiment. After completion, the furnace was cooled to below 150 °C before removing the regenerated sample. The regenerated GAC samples were labeled as KN-temperature-time. For example, KN-900-30 referred to GAC regenerated at 900 °C and a holding time of 30 min.
The second regeneration method was to reactivate the spent GAC samples by using a CO2 atmosphere at the end of the first stage. In the pyrolysis-activation experiments, the first stage was to increase the system temperature to 500 °C at 10 °C/min. In the second stage, the gas atmosphere was switched to CO2 flowing at 100 mL/min while stopping N2 flow and further increasing the furnace to the target temperature. Samples regenerated under these conditions were labeled as KNC-temperature-time. For example, KNC-900-30 referred to a GAC sample thermally activated at 900 °C under CO2 for 30 min.

2.4. Determinations of Textural and Chemical Characteristics of Regenerated AC Products

To assess changes in pore structure after thermal regeneration, nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms were measured using a high-performance system (Model: ASAP 2020 Plus; Micromeritics Co., Norcross, GA, USA) at −196 °C. Prior to the isotherm analysis, about 0.25 g of the test samples (i.e., spent and regenerated GAC products) were degassed under a vacuum (condition: ≤10 μmHg at 200 °C for about 10 h) to remove moisture and other impurities. The data on the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area was calculated from the relative pressure (P/P0) range of 0.05 to 0.30. The total pore volume was estimated on the assumption that the liquid nitrogen (liquid density at −196 °C = 0.8064 g/cm3) filled all pores at saturation (i.e., P/P0 set at 0.995). Furthermore, micropore surface area and micropore volume were obtained by the Harkins and Jura thickness model (i.e., t-plot method) [29,30]. The pore size distribution, particularly in the mesoporous range, was calculated using the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) method.
The surface morphology and elemental composition of the spent and regenerated GAC samples were examined using scanning electron microscopy (Model: S-3000N; Hitachi Co., Tokyo, Japan) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (Model: X-stream-2; Oxford Instruments, Abingdon, UK). During SEM analysis, a 15 kV acceleration potential was applied. Prior to imaging, the samples were gold-coated using an ion sputter coater (Model: E1010; Hitachi Co., Tokyo, Japan) to provide a conductive surface. SEM-EDS results were used to compare the structural and chemical changes between the spent and regenerated samples.

3. Results

3.1. Thermochemical Characteristics of Spent GAC

As shown in Table 1, the proximate analysis revealed that the spent GAC contained significant amounts of ash and volatile matter, indicating that the exhausted adsorbent was contaminated by the deposited particles and adsorbed organics from the vent and process streams. TGA was performed to further explore the thermal desorption and decomposition behaviors of the spent GAC, as illustrated in Figure 1. Three distinct regions were observed in the derivative thermogravimetry (DTG) curve. In the temperature range of 100–300 °C, the observed weight loss is likely attributed to the thermal desorption of moisture, light gases (e.g., CO2) and low-molecular-weight organics [31]. At the higher temperature range, 300–500 °C, it is likely due to the thermal desorption or decomposition of heavier organics adsorbed onto the sample. The thermal decomposition that occurred above 700 °C is a significant observation, which may be due to the breakdown of the limited inorganics with moderate melting points and adsorbed organics with high decomposition features [16] or the char forming of residual/trapped organics [32].
Based on these results, a process temperature above 800 °C was selected, implying the production of highly carbonized char with relatively low yields. Based on the TGA/DTG results and considering energy consumption, the thermal regeneration of spent GAC was conducted at 800, 850, and 900 °C. The holding time varied between 0, 30, and 60 min after reaching the target temperature.

3.2. Pore Properties of Spent GAC and Its Regenerated Products

The pore properties, such as the BET surface area, total pore volume, micropore surface area, and micropore volume of the spent GAC and regenerated products, are summarized in Table 2. The nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms (at −196 °C) and the corresponding mesopore size distributions of the regenerated samples are presented in Figure 2 and Figure 3.
The key findings of the results presented in Table 2 and Figure 2 and Figure 3 are summarized in the following points:
  • The regenerated samples exhibited significantly improved pore properties compared to the spent GAC (e.g., BET surface area of 425.17 m2/g and total pore volume of 0.184 cm3/g). The variations in pore property trends were not consistent with pyrolysis temperature and holding time. Interestingly, the maximum pore properties (BET surface area of 605.38 m2/g and total pore volume of 0.272 cm3/g) were obtained under the minimal process conditions (800 °C and 0 min holding time).
  • The CO2-activated products generally displayed even higher pore properties than both the spent GAC and the pyrolysis-regenerated products except in the cases of KN-800-00 and KNC-800-00. It can be attributed to further activation by the interaction of the CO2 gas with carbon (AC or char) due to the following chemical reaction [1]:
    C(solid) + CO2(gas) → 2CO(gas)
    Above 800 °C, CO2 gas reacted with the carbon matrix, thus opening the pores, which resulted in higher pore properties. The maximal pore properties (BET surface area 723.23 m2/g, and total pore volume 0.327 cm3/g) of the CO2-activated GAC products were produced at 900 °C and a 30 min holding time. These results show that, under optimized pyrolysis-activation conditions, approximately 70% of the pore properties can be achieved, making these regenerated GACs highly promising for water treatment applications.
  • As shown in Figure 2, the nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms of spent GAC (KN) and the regenerated products (KN-900-30 and KNC-900-30) displayed both Type I (major) and Type VI (minor) patterns, typically indicating the presence of both micropores and mesopores [29]. Type I curves exhibited steep uptake at low relative pressures, corresponding to high micropore adsorption potential. On the other hand, the Type VI isotherms featured slight hysteresis loops, starting around a relative pressure of approximately 0.30. Figure 3 further confirms the presence of mesopores with the recorded peak at approximately 4.0 nm, while an upward trend below 2.0 nm on the left of the curve indicates a microporous structure. For more precise micropore distribution analysis, models such as Dubinin–Astakhov (DA) and Horvath–Kawazoe (HK) are recommended [29,30].

3.3. Textural and Chemical Characteristics of Spent GAC and Its Regenerated Products

SEM and EDS analyses were employed to examine the surface morphology and elemental composition of the spent and regenerated GACs. Figure 4 shows the SEM images of the spent GAC and two of the regenerated samples (KN-900-00 and KNC-900-00) at 1000× and 3000× magnifications. It can be seen that fine particles were loosely deposited or packed on the GAC surface. Although the samples exhibited similar porous textures, the CO2-activated product (KNC-900-00) appeared more porous, as seen in Figure 4c, which corresponds with its higher measured pore properties compared to those of spent GAC and pyrolysis-regenerated GAC (i.e., KN-900-00).
Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) was used in this work in order to acquire the spectra for the purpose of determining the changes in the elemental compositions of spent GAC and its regenerated products [33]. The analysis showed the carbon content of spent GAC to be as high as 61.20 wt% (Figure 5a). The spent GAC also contained significant amounts of other non-carbon elements like oxygen (O, 30.14 wt%), iron (Fe, 3.03 wt%), silicon (Si, 3.28 wt%), and aluminum (Al, 2.34 wt%). In comparison, analysis showed the typical regenerated GAC products (KN-900-00 and KNC-900-00) (Figure 5b,c), to have higher carbon and lower oxygen content. These results could be attributed to the desorption and the activation (charring) of adsorbed constituents, thus releasing some oxygen-containing gases (e.g., H2O, CO, CO2) during the thermal regeneration process.

4. Conclusions

The regeneration of spent or exhausted activated carbon (AC) generally refers to the desorption and/or decomposition of adsorbed contaminants without damaging the original carbon structure, thereby restoring its adsorption capacity for reuse. In this study, spent cylindrical GAC from an electronics manufacturing facility was thermally regenerated using two approaches: simple pyrolysis and CO2-enhanced pyrolysis-activation. Based on the pore properties of spent GAC and its regenerated products, gasification of a carbon matrix carried out above 800 °C using CO2 was able to open and create more pores, thereby improving the pore properties as compared to those of spent GAC and its N2-pyrolyzed regenerated products. The maximal pore properties (BET surface area of 723.23 m2/g and total pore volume of 0.327 cm3/g) of the CO2-activated GAC products were produced at 900 °C and a 30 min holding time. Approximately 70% of the pore properties can be restored based on the investigated pyrolysis-activation regeneration conditions. SEM images confirmed enhanced surface porosity, while EDS analyses showed an increase in carbon content and a reduction in surface oxygen after regeneration.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.-T.T. and W.-S.C.; methodology, Y.-C.Y.; formal analysis, Y.-C.Y.; data curation, C.-H.T.; writing—original draft preparation, W.-T.T.; writing—review and editing, W.-T.T.; supervision, W.-S.C. and W.-T.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by funding from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST 111-2622-E-020-009).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

Sincere appreciation was expressed to acknowledge the National Pingtung University of Science and Technology for their assistance in the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and the energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) analyses.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Marsh, H.; Rodriguez-Reinoso, F. Activated Carbon; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bansal, R.C.; Goyal, M. Activated Carbon Adsorption; CRC Press: Bocca Raton, FL, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  3. Suzuki, M. Adsorption Engineering; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  4. Hwang, S.Y.; Lee, G.B.; Kim, J.H.; Hong, B.U.; Park, J.E. Pre-treatment methods for regeneration of spent activated carbon. Molecules 2020, 25, 4561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ma, Y.; Zhang, X.; Wen, J. Study on the harm of waste activated carbon and novel regeneration technology of it. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021, 769, 022047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Srivastava, A.; Gupta, B.; Majumder, A.; Gupta, A.K.; Nimbhorkar, S.K. A comprehensive review on the synthesis, performance, modifications, and regeneration of activated carbon for the adsorptive removal of various water pollutants. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 106177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Santos, D.H.D.S.; Xiao, Y.; Chaukura, N.; Hill, J.M.; Selvasembian, R.; Zanta, C.L.P.S.; Meili, L. Regeneration of dye-saturated activated carbon through advanced oxidative processes: A review. Heliyon 2022, 8, e10205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Wang, Y.; Wu, G.; Zhang, Y.; Su, Y.; Zhang, H. The deactivation mechanisms, regeneration methods and devices of activated carbon in applications. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 476, 143751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zheng, T.; Wang, Q.; Shi, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Ma, Y. Microwave regeneration of spent activated carbon for the treatment of ester-containing wastewater. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 60815–60825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ma, A.; Zheng, X.; Liu, C.; Peng, J.; Li, S.; Zhang, L.; Liu, C. Study on regeneration of spent activated carbon by using a clean technology. Green Process. Synth. 2017, 6, 499–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Durán-Jiménez, G.; Stevens, L.A.; Hodgins, G.R.; Uguna, J.; Ryan, J.; Binner, E.R.; Robinson, J.P. Fast regeneration of activated carbons saturated with textile dyes: Textural, thermal and dielectric characterization. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 378, 121774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Oladejo, J.; Shi, K.; Chen, Y.; Luo, X.; Gang, Y.; Wu, T. Closing the active carbon cycle: Regeneration of spent activated carbon from a wastewater treatment facility for resource optimization. Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif. 2020, 150, 107878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Huang, F.; Liu, C.; Cheng, S.; Li, T. Microwave thermal regeneration characteristics of spent activated carbon based on a coupled electromagnetic, heat and mass transfer multiphase porous media model. Energy 2024, 292, 130437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, Y.; Jin, H.; Liu, W.; Lu, Y.; Li, J. Study on regeneration of waste powder activated carbon through pyrolysis and its adsorption capacity of phosphorus. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cazetta, A.L.; Junior, O.P.; Vargas, A.M.M.; da Silva, A.P.; Zou, X.; Asefa, T.; Almeida, V.C. Thermal regeneration study of high surface area activated carbon obtained from coconut shell: Characterization and application of response surface methodology. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2013, 101, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yang, H.-C.; Lee, M.-W.; Eun, H.-C.; Kim, H.-J.; Lee, K.; Seo, B.-K. Thermal decontamination of spent activated carbon contaminated with radiocarbon and tritium. Processes 2020, 8, 1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Baghirzade, B.S.; Zhang, Y.; Reuther, J.F.; Saleh, N.B.; Venkatesan, A.K.; Apul, O.G. Thermal regeneration of spent granular activated carbon presents an opportunity to break the forever PFAS cycle. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 55, 5608–5619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Guo, Y.; Du, E. The effects of thermal regeneration conditions and inorganic compounds on the characteristics of activated carbon used in power plant. Energy Procedia 2012, 17 Pt A, 444–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Álvarez, P.M.; Beltrán, F.J.; Gómez-Serrano, V.; Jaramillo, J.; Rodríguez, E.M. Comparison between thermal and ozone regenerations of spent activated carbon exhausted with phenol. Water Res. 2004, 38, 2155–2165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cho, J.H.; Kim, Y.S.; Jeon, S.B.; Seo, J.B.; Jung, J.H.; Oh, K.J. Improvement of thermal regeneration of spent granular activated carbon using air agent: Application of sintering and deoxygenation. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2014, 31, 1641–1650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Toledo, R.B.C.; Aragón-Tobar, C.F.; Gámez, S.; de la Torre, E. Reactivation process of activated carbons: Effect on the mechanical and adsorptive properties. Molecules 2020, 25, 1681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Nasir, M.Z.M.; Indiran, G.; Zaini, M.A.A. Assessment of thermal regeneration of spent commercial activated carbon for methylene blue dye removal. Part. Sci. Technol. 2021, 39, 504–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Fagbohun, E.O.; Wang, Q.; Spessato, L.; Zheng, Y.; Li, W.; Olatoye, A.G.; Cui, Y. Physicochemical regeneration of industrial spent activated carbons using a green activating agent and their adsorption for methyl orange. Surf. Interfaces 2022, 29, 101696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Márquez, P.; Benítez, A.; Chica, A.F.; Martín, M.A.; Caballero, A. Evaluating the thermal regeneration process of massively generated granular activated carbons for their reuse in wastewater treatments plants. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 366, 132685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yuan, H.; Ye, J.; Yang, J.; Wang, H.; Ni, X.; Li, D.; Chen, Y. Green regeneration of spent activated carbon from antibiotics purification as remarkable absorbent for aqueous Cd2+ removal. J. Hazard. Mater. Adv. 2023, 12, 100361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tsai, W.T.; Chen, H.P.; Hsieh, M.F.; Sun, H.F.; Chien, S.F. Regeneration of spent bleaching earth by pyrolysis in a rotary furnace. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2002, 63, 157–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tsai, W.T.; Lai, C.W. Adsorption of herbicide paraquat by clay mineral regenerated from spent bleaching earth. J. Hazard. Mater. 2006, 134, 144–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pollard, S.J.T.; Sollars, C.J.; Perry, R. A clay-carbon adsorbent derived from spent bleaching earth: Surface characterisation and adsorption of chlorophenols from aqueous solution. Carbon 1992, 30, 639–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lowell, S.; Shields, J.E.; Thomas, M.A.; Thommes, M. Characterization of Porous Solids and Powders: Surface Area, Pore Size and Density; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  30. Condon, J.B. Surface Area and Porosity Determinations by Physisorption: Measurements and Theory; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  31. So, J.Y.; Cho, H.R. Thermal characteristics of spent activated carbon generated from air cleaning units in Korean nuclear power plants. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 2017, 49, 873–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chen, D.; Cen, K.; Zhuang, X.; Gan, Z.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, H. Insight into biomass pyrolysis mechanism based on cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin: Evolution of volatiles and kinetics, elucidation of reaction pathways, and characterization of gas, biochar and bio-oil. Combust. Flame 2022, 242, 112142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Steiner, C. Considerations in biochar characterization. In Agricultural and Environmental Applications of Biochar: Advances and Barriers; Guo, M., He, Z., Uchimiya, S.M., Eds.; Soil Science Society of America: Madison, WI, USA, 2016; pp. 87–100. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and derivative thermogravimetry (DTG) curve of spent GAC at a heating rate of 10 °C/min.
Figure 1. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and derivative thermogravimetry (DTG) curve of spent GAC at a heating rate of 10 °C/min.
Applsci 15 05336 g001
Figure 2. N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms of some regenerated GAC products.
Figure 2. N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms of some regenerated GAC products.
Applsci 15 05336 g002
Figure 3. Pore size distributions of some regenerated GAC products.
Figure 3. Pore size distributions of some regenerated GAC products.
Applsci 15 05336 g003
Figure 4. SEM images of (a) spent GAC (KN), (b) an N2-pyrolyzed GAC product (KN-900-00), and (c) a CO2-activated GAC product (KNC-900-00).
Figure 4. SEM images of (a) spent GAC (KN), (b) an N2-pyrolyzed GAC product (KN-900-00), and (c) a CO2-activated GAC product (KNC-900-00).
Applsci 15 05336 g004aApplsci 15 05336 g004b
Figure 5. Elemental compositions of (a) spent GAC (KN), (b) regenerated GAC product (KN-900-00), and (c) regenerated GAC product (KNC-900-00) by EDS analysis.
Figure 5. Elemental compositions of (a) spent GAC (KN), (b) regenerated GAC product (KN-900-00), and (c) regenerated GAC product (KNC-900-00) by EDS analysis.
Applsci 15 05336 g005aApplsci 15 05336 g005b
Table 1. Proximate analysis of spent GAC (denoted as KN).
Table 1. Proximate analysis of spent GAC (denoted as KN).
Property aValue
Moisture (wt%)9.99 ± 0.50
Ash (wt%)13.58 ± 0.66
Volatile matter (wt%)13.34 ± 0.95
Fixed carbon b (wt%)73.08
a Mean ± standard deviation for three determinations of an as-received spent GAC sample. b By difference.
Table 2. Pore properties of spent GAC (denoted as KN) and regenerated GAC products.
Table 2. Pore properties of spent GAC (denoted as KN) and regenerated GAC products.
Spent GAC (KN) and Regenerated GAC Product aSBET b
(m2/g)
Smicro c
(m2/g)
Vt d
(cm3/g)
Vmicro c
(cm3/g)
KN425.17324.040.1840.129
KN-800-00605.38385.990.2720.156
KNC-800-00538.00426.680.2310.169
KN-800-30516.43422.740.2200.170
KNC-800-30578.22405.790.2540.163
KN-800-60523.99413.950.2240.165
KNC-800-60647.15470.200.2830.188
KN-850-00531.67444.320.2230.175
KNC-850-00555.93400.130.2490.161
KN-850-30519.14397.930.2220.158
KNC-850-30541.13399.760.2390.160
KN-850-60521.42420.760.2220.168
KNC-850-60634.97433.990.2780.174
KN-900-00558.38451.830.2370.179
KNC-900-00569.21409.040.2600.164
KN-900-30569.32411.530.2490.165
KNC-900-30723.23457.250.3270.185
KN-900-60496.08387.650.2120.154
KNC-900-60699.88385.890.3160.155
a Sample codes were denoted as the regenerated GAC produced at 800, 850, and 900 °C for holding 0, 30, and 60 min. b BET surface area (SBET) was calculated from a relative pressure range of 0.05–0.30 (15 points). c Micropore surface area (Smicro) and micropore volume (Vmicro) were estimated by the t-plot method. d Total pore volume (Vt) was obtained at a saturated relative pressure (about 0.995).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ye, Y.-C.; Chen, W.-S.; Tsai, C.-H.; Tsai, W.-T. The Combination of Nitrogen (N2) Pyrolysis and Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Activation for Regenerating Spent Activated Carbon. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 5336. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15105336

AMA Style

Ye Y-C, Chen W-S, Tsai C-H, Tsai W-T. The Combination of Nitrogen (N2) Pyrolysis and Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Activation for Regenerating Spent Activated Carbon. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(10):5336. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15105336

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ye, Ya-Chen, Wen-Shing Chen, Chi-Hung Tsai, and Wen-Tien Tsai. 2025. "The Combination of Nitrogen (N2) Pyrolysis and Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Activation for Regenerating Spent Activated Carbon" Applied Sciences 15, no. 10: 5336. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15105336

APA Style

Ye, Y.-C., Chen, W.-S., Tsai, C.-H., & Tsai, W.-T. (2025). The Combination of Nitrogen (N2) Pyrolysis and Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Activation for Regenerating Spent Activated Carbon. Applied Sciences, 15(10), 5336. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15105336

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop