A Method for Building a Mixed-Reality Digital Twin of a Roadheader Monitoring System
Abstract
:Featured Application
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Architecture of Digital Twin Monitoring System
2.1. Overall Architecture of Digital Twin Monitoring System
2.1.1. Multi-Valued Attribute Physical Entity
2.1.2. Digital Twin Virtual Entity
2.1.3. Data Processing System
2.1.4. User Interaction System
2.1.5. Network Transmission System
2.2. The Cutting Behavior Process of the Roadheader
- Start the rotation of the cutting head, and the star wheel and the transfer part rotate forward.
- The traveling part drives the fuselage forward, and the cutting head drills into the coal wall for an appropriate distance.
- The shovel plate swings downward, and the rear support swings downward to lift the fuselage.
- Adjust the cutting arm so that the cutting head is at the lower left corner of the ideal contour of the cutting surface.
- Control the cutting head to cut in an S-shaped route, and then perform wall brushing and floor cutting to complete the cutting cycle. The cutting path and the ideal roadway profile are shown in Figure 6.
- The cutting head drops and waits for the support operation.
2.3. Digital Twin Human–Computer Interaction Platform
3. Construction of the Digital Twin Monitoring System
3.1. Construction of the Main Modules of the Digital Twin Monitoring System
3.1.1. Digital Twin Geometric Model
3.1.2. Network Communication Module
3.1.3. Human–Computer Interaction Interface
3.1.4. User Controller
3.1.5. Data Processing Module
3.2. Construction of the Exchange System Twin Data
3.2.1. Data Storage Module
3.2.2. Network Connection Module
4. Laboratory Experiment of the Roadheader Digital Twin Monitoring System
4.1. Bidirectional Mapping Test of Cutting Behavior
4.2. Visual Monitoring Test
4.3. Accuracy Validation of the Digital Twin
- Timeliness of virtual mapping. The operating information of the roadheader test prototype model can be quickly transmitted to the digital model to achieve the action synchronization of the two. The delay time difference scatter plot is shown in Figure 23. After measurement and calculation, the average delay is 60 ms, and the timeliness is good.
- Accuracy of virtual–real interaction. The angle values of the mechanism motion positions between the roadheader test prototype and the digital model are highly consistent. The maximum transmission errors of the cutting arm and the slewing platform are 3.756% and 5.000%, respectively, and the average transmission errors are 0.288% and 0.757%, respectively. There are mainly two reasons for the generation of transmission errors: Firstly, field loss occurs during the process of data format conversion and splitting, resulting in a deterioration in the accuracy. Secondly, the program cannot process data in a timely manner during the measurement process, resulting in data delay, thereby causing deviations in the observed data.
- Reliability of virtual–real interaction. The measurement errors generated during the action execution process of the roadheader test prototype model are relatively large, with the maximum values being 15.028% and 19.725%, respectively, and the average values being 3.695% and 1.306%, respectively. Although the maximum values are large, the average values are both lower than 3.700%, so they basically meet the accuracy requirements. There are the following three reasons for the generation of the measurement errors: Firstly, errors arise due to the insufficient accuracy of the actuator of the test prototype and the existence of a large rotation dead zone. At the same time, there is accuracy loss in the process of the digital signal to electrical signal conversion and pulse signal length calculation, inevitably leading to observation errors. Secondly, there are a few moments with large delays during the signal transmission and execution process, which leads to the action delay of the actuator and thus causes large deviations. Finally, problems such as the accuracy of the sensor and the jitter of the servo motor will further expand the error.
5. Conclusions
- The roadheader digital twin monitoring system enables users to fully display the operating status and environmental changes of the roadheader, assists users in completing information identification beyond the line of sight, and improves the efficiency of users’ information acquisition, achieving the bidirectional mapping and bidirectional interaction between the digital model and physical entity.
- The operating information of the roadheader experimental prototype can be quickly transmitted to the digital model to achieve the action synchronization of both. After measurement and calculation, the average delay is 60 ms, and the timeliness is good.
- The motion angle values of the roadheader prototype and the digital model are highly consistent. The maximum angle transmission errors of the cutting arm and the slewing platform are 3.756% and 5.000%, respectively, and the average transmission errors are 0.288% and 0.757%, respectively, and the accuracy is good.
- The measurement errors generated during the action execution process of the roadheader prototype model are relatively large, with the maximum values being 15.028% and 19.725%, respectively, and the average values being 3.695% and 1.306%, respectively. Although the maximum values are large, the average values are both lower than 3.7%, so they basically meet the accuracy requirements.
6. Limitations and Future Research Directions
6.1. Limitations of This Study
6.2. Future Research Directions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
MR | Mixed Reality |
AR | Augmented Reality |
VR | Virtual Reality |
DTMSR | Digital Twin Monitoring System for Roadheader |
MAPE | Multi-Valued Attribute Physical Entity |
DTVE | Digital Twin Virtual Entity |
DPS | Data Processing System |
UIS | User Interaction System |
NTS | Network Transmission System |
CRC | Cyclic Redundancy Checks |
FEC | Forward Error Correction |
References
- Mao, J.; Dong, Y.; Lu, J.; Li, Y.; Zhang, H.; Xie, M.; Wu, X.; Liu, Z.; Wang, H.; Tian, B. Research Status and Prospects of Advanced Technology in Roadway Tunneling and Drilling. Coal J. 2021, 46, 2084–2099. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, B. Analysis of Deep Mining in Coal Mines and Disaster Prevention in China. China Pet. Chem. Stand. Qual. 2020, 40, 192–193. [Google Scholar]
- Comakli, R.; Kahraman, S.; Balci, C. Performance Prediction of Roadheaders in Metallic Ore Excavation. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2014, 40, 38–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roman, M.; Breido, J.; Drijd, N. Development of Position System of a Roadheader on a Base of Active IR-sensor. Procedia Eng. 2015, 100, 617–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Corke, P.; Roberts, J.; Cunningham, J.; Hainsworth, D. Mining Robotics. In Springer Handbook of Robotics, 2nd ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008; pp. 1127–1150. [Google Scholar]
- Jiang, X.X.; Li, C.X. Statistical Analysis on Coal Mine Accidents in China from 2013 to 2017 and Discussion on the Countermeasures. Coal Eng. 2019, 51, 101–105. [Google Scholar]
- Xie, H.P.; Wu, L.X.; Zheng, D.Z. Prediction on the Energy Consumption and Coal Demand of China in 2025. J. China Coal Soc. 2019, 44, 1949–1960. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, W.; Zhai, G.; Yue, Z.; Pan, T.; Cheng, R. Research on Visual Positioning of a Roadheader and Construction of an Environment Map. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 4968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, J.; Yang, Y.; Cheng, X.; Zuo, H.; Cheng, Z. The Development of Digital Twin Technology Review. In Proceedings of the 2020 Chinese Automation Congress (CAC 2020), Shanghai, China, 6–8 November 2020; pp. 4901–4906. [Google Scholar]
- Agrawal, A.; Fischer, M.; Singh, V. Digital Twin: From Concept to Practice. J. Manag. Eng. 2022, 38, 06022001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.P.; Liu, Y.J.; Lu, F.C. Application Prospects and Key Technologies of Digital Twin in Transmission and Transformation Equipment. High Volt. Eng. 2022, 48, 1621–1633. [Google Scholar]
- Bao, J.; Zhang, R.; Li, J.; Lu, Y.; Peng, T. Digital Twin Collaboration Technology Oriented to Human-Machine-Environment Integration. J. Mech. Eng. 2022, 58, 103–115. [Google Scholar]
- Tekinerdogan, B. On the Notion of Digital Twins: A Modeling Perspective. Systems 2023, 11, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ge, S.; Fan, Z.; Shibo, W. Research on Digital Twin Smart Mining Face Technology Architecture. J. Coal Sci. 2020, 45, 1925–1936. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, X.; Zhang, C.; Wang, M.; Wang, Y.; Du, Y.; Mao, Q.; Lyu, X. Virtual Control Technology of Cantilever Roadheader Driven by Digital Twin. Comput. Integr. Manuf. Syst. 2021, 27, 1617–1628. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, C.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, K.; Xie, N.; Zhou, C. Remote Automatic Cutting Control Technology of Roadheader Driven by Digital Twin. Mine Autom. 2020, 46, 15–20+32. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, S.; Du, Y.; Xue, G.; Tian, J.; Wu, M. Research and Application of Roadheader Remote Control Technology and Monitoring System. China Coal 2013, 39, 63–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, W.; Fang, J.; Liu, F. Real-time State Mapping of Roadheader Based on Digital Twin. J. Hunan Univ. (Nat. Sci.) 2022, 49, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
- Fan, G. Application and Future Development of Virtual Reality Technology in Media Industry. Media 2020, 6, 22–26. [Google Scholar]
- Ogunseiju, O.R.; Gonsalves, N.; Akanmu, A.A.; Bairaktarova, D.; Bowman, D.A.; Jazizadeh, F. Mixed Reality Environment for Learning Sensing Technology Applications in Construction: A Usability Study. Adv. Eng. Inform. 2022, 53, 101637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, L.; Liu, Z.; Wu, M. Intelligent Optimal Control Considering Dynamic Posture Compensation for a Cantilever Roadheader. Robotica 2021, 40, 583–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Hao, X.; Lin, H.; Jia, H.; Cui, Y.; Wang, S.; Gao, Y.; Guang, J.; Ge, S. A Method for Building a Mixed-Reality Digital Twin of a Roadheader Monitoring System. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 11582. https://doi.org/10.3390/app142411582
Hao X, Lin H, Jia H, Cui Y, Wang S, Gao Y, Guang J, Ge S. A Method for Building a Mixed-Reality Digital Twin of a Roadheader Monitoring System. Applied Sciences. 2024; 14(24):11582. https://doi.org/10.3390/app142411582
Chicago/Turabian StyleHao, Xuedi, Hanhui Lin, Han Jia, Yitong Cui, Shengjie Wang, Yingzong Gao, Ji Guang, and Shirong Ge. 2024. "A Method for Building a Mixed-Reality Digital Twin of a Roadheader Monitoring System" Applied Sciences 14, no. 24: 11582. https://doi.org/10.3390/app142411582
APA StyleHao, X., Lin, H., Jia, H., Cui, Y., Wang, S., Gao, Y., Guang, J., & Ge, S. (2024). A Method for Building a Mixed-Reality Digital Twin of a Roadheader Monitoring System. Applied Sciences, 14(24), 11582. https://doi.org/10.3390/app142411582