Ensuring Stable Operation of Wind Farms Connected to Distribution Networks
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Analysis of the Requirements for Stable Operation of Wind Farms
- 1.
- Ensure that the wind turbines are turned off in case of voltage dips with their subsequent turning on after a short circuit in the distribution network is eliminated.
- 2.
- Prevent wind turbine shutdowns in case of voltage dips of a given depth and duration.
- 3.
- Ensure the stable operation of the wind turbine within the limits of the LVRT characteristic with the reactive current injection at a given rate of rise.
- Line (interphase) voltage (UAB, UBC, UCA) is measured at the inverter output (690 V);
- Inverter protection is triggered when any of the line voltages drops below the specified setting in terms of the voltage dip (it is deeper) and in terms of its duration (it is longer), in accordance with the voltage–time LVRT characteristic;
- When the inverter protection is triggered, the wind turbine circuit breaker is switched off at a voltage of 690 V [27].
- Control voltage within no more than 20 ms after fixing the voltage dip by injecting a reactive current of at least 2% of Irated for every 1% of the voltage dip;
- Ensure the maximum value of the output reactive current, but no less than 100% of Irated [28].
- Time for fixing a voltage dip—t0 ≤ 10 ms;
- Time for stopping the supply of active power—t1 ≤ 10 ms;
- Maximum time before the start of reactive current injection—t2 ≤ 10.1 ms;
- Maximum time until the reactive current reaches 0.9 (0.95) Irated—t3 = 50 (55) ms;
- Time for the reactive current to reach the set steady-state value in the range of +20%/−10%—t4 = 80 ms;
- Maximum short-term excess of the reactive current over the steady-state value—I ≤ 0.1 Irated.
3. Materials and Methods
4. Results
- Zone 1 (0–0.2 s) is characterized by the fact that the parameters for setting the LVRT characteristics according to the requirements of the grid codes of Denmark, Italy, Spain, UK, and China do not provide the prevention of wind turbine shutdowns. This is because the value of Ures at the output of wind turbine inverters is lower than the settings of the LVRT characteristic. The grid codes in some countries allow wind turbine shutdowns when Ures drops below 15–25% Unom with a duration of 0.1–0.15 s. At the same time, the requirements of the grid codes of Germany, Ireland, and Canada make it possible to ensure the stable operation of wind turbines under standard disturbances in the analyzed time interval.
- Zone 2 (0.2–1.0 s) is characterized by the fact that most wind turbine manufacturers ensure that the required Ures value is maintained at the output of wind turbine inverters under standard disturbances. Therefore, with single-phase short circuits (more than 70% of the total number) eliminated by backup protections (the second stage region) with a time delay of up to 1 s, there will be no wind turbine shutdowns. However, the requirements of the grid codes of Denmark, Italy, Spain, and UK do not allow preventing disconnections of wind turbines.
- Zone 3 (more than 1 s) is distinguished in that when a single-phase short circuit lasting more than 1–2 s is cleared by backup protections (the second or third stage region), in the vast majority of cases, wind turbines will be shut down. In some countries, however, in distribution networks with a voltage over 69 kV, wind turbines must continue to operate stably up to 2.5 s.
- 1.
- Upgrading relay protection devices and automatic controls in the distribution network adjacent to the wind farm.
- 2.
- Activating the reactive current injection function at the wind turbine during short circuit.
- 3.
- Installing additional electrical devices at wind farms.
- STATCOM;
- Current-limiting reactor (CLR).
- Nominal voltage: 35 kV;
- Nominal power: 10 MVA;
- Operating voltage range: 80% Unom ≤ Uoper ≤ 120% Unom;
- Speed: 5–10 ms;
- Protection setting to turn off when the voltage drops below 80% Unom: toff = 50 ms.
- Nominal voltage: 35 kV;
- Nominal current: 1000 A;
- Inductive reactance (XCLR): from 1 to 10 Ohm.
- From 8% Unom to 25% Unom (increase by 213%) for three-phase short circuits;
- From 40% Unom to 60% Unom (increase by 50%) with two-phase short circuits;
- From 68% Unom to 76% Unom (increase by 12%) with single-phase short circuits.
- 4.
- Making changes to the hardware of wind turbine inverters.
- The value of the capacitance of the capacitor used in the DC link between the rectifier and the inverter;
- The power supply to the control circuits of the inverter controller from the DC link;
- The generation of erroneous signals in the PLL unit when the voltage at its input is below 20% Unom.
- Smoothing the ripples related to the operation of the rectifier;
- Eliminating the overvoltage caused by switching off the inverter power switches and by the variable schedule of the wind generator operation.
5. Discussion
- The modernization of relay protection devices by the replacement of electromechanical devices with digital ones can reduce the response time of the second and third stages of backup protections to 0.9–1.0 s. In addition, the second sets of relay protection devices with absolute selectivity should be used as backup protections with automatic introduction of accelerated stepped protections.
- The activation of the wind farm reactive current injection function, which can be incorrectly set, and in some cases disabled, makes it possible to increase the residual voltage at the output of the wind turbine inverters with a short-circuit duration of up to 0.2s and prevent unnecessary shutdowns of the wind turbine.
- The application of STATCOM is ineffective for the stable operation of wind turbines under standard disturbances in the distribution network due to the narrow range of operating voltage, 80% Unom ≤ Uoper ≤ 120% Unom.
- The series connection of CLR in the circuit of the 35/110 kV step-up transformer of a wind farm is effective as it increases the residual voltage at the outputs of inverters of the wind turbines and prevents their excessive shutdowns. In each case of wind farm connection to the distribution network, XCLR should be determined based on the results of transient calculations.
- The most effective technical solution is to make changes to the hardware of wind turbine inverters and install a block of supercapacitors and a DC-DC converter. This enables the adjustment of the operating range of the LVRT characteristic and prevents unnecessary shutdowns of the wind turbine under any type of standard disturbances. At the same time, there is no need to upgrade relay protection devices and automatic controls in the distribution network.
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Beyza, J.; Yusta, J.M. The effects of the high penetration of renewable energies on the reliability and vulnerability of interconnected electric power systems. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2021, 215, 107881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panda, A.; Dauda, A.K.; Chua, H.; Tan, R.R.; Aviso, K.B. Recent advances in the integration of renewable energy sources and storage facilities with hybrid power systems. Clean. Eng. Technol. 2023, 12, 100598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gorman, W.; Mills, A.; Wiser, R. Improving estimates of transmission capital costs for utility-scale wind and solar projects to inform renewable energy policy. Energy Policy 2019, 135, 110994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, M.; Junne, T.; Haas, J.; Klein, M. Plummeting costs of renewables—Are energy scenarios lagging? Energy Strategy Rev. 2021, 35, 100636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dvorak, A.J.; Victoria, M. Key Determinants of Solar Share in Solar- and Wind-Driven Grids. IEEE J. Photovolt. 2023, 13, 476–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Russo, M.A.; Carvalho, D.; Martins, N.; Monteiro, A. Forecasting the inevitable: A review on the impacts of climate change on renewable energy resources. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2022, 52, 102283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhong, J.; Bollen, M.; Rönnberg, S. Towards a 100% renewable energy electricity generation system in Sweden. Renew. Energy 2021, 171, 812–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saffari, M.; Mc Pherson, M. Assessment of Canada’s electricity system potential for variable renewable energy integration. Energy 2022, 250, 123757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Avazov, A.; Colas, F.; Beerten, J.; Guillaud, X. Application of input shaping method to vibrations damping in a Type-IV wind turbine interfaced with a grid-forming converter. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 2022, 210, 108083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahimi, M.; Assari, H. Addressing and assessing the issues related to connection of the wind turbine generators to the distribution grid. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2017, 86, 138–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, Z.; Xing, Y. Load mitigation method for wind turbines during emergency shutdowns. Renew. Energy 2022, 185, 978–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, A.; Pei, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Qian, Z. Wind turbine fault detection and identification through self-attention-based mechanism embedded with a multivariable query pattern. Renew. Energy 2023, 211, 918–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ilyushin, P.; Filippov, S.; Kulikov, A.; Suslov, K.; Karamov, D. Specific Features of Operation of Distributed Generation Facilities Based on Gas Reciprocating Units in Internal Power Systems of Industrial Entities. Machines 2022, 10, 693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yadav, M.; Pal, N.; Saini, D.K. Low voltage ride through capability for resilient electrical distribution system integrated with renewable energy resources. Energy Rep. 2023, 9, 833–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chakraborty, A.; Maity, T. Integrated control algorithm for fast and accurate detection of the voltage sag with low voltage ride-through (LVRT) enhancement for doubly-fed induction generator (DFIG) based wind turbines. Control Eng. Pract. 2023, 131, 105393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suvorov, A.; Askarov, A.; Bay, Y.; Maliuta, B.; Achitaev, A.; Suslov, K. Comparative small-signal stability analysis of voltage-controlled and enhanced current-controlled virtual synchronous generators under weak and stiff grid conditions. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2023, 147, 108891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeng, B.; Wang, J.; Shi, J.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Y. A multi-level approach to active distribution system planning for efficient renewable energy harvesting in a deregulated environment. Energy 2016, 96, 614–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ilyushin, P.V.; Pazderin, A.V. Approaches to organization of emergency control at isolated operation of energy areas with distributed generation. In Proceedings of the International Ural Conference on Green Energy (URALCON), Chelyabinsk, Russia, 4–6 October 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, B.; Sharma, J. A review on distributed generation planning. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 76, 529–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruban, N.; Suvorov, A.; Andreev, M.; Ufa, R.; Askarov, A.; Gusev, A.; Bhalja, B. Software and Hardware Decision Support System for Operators of Electrical Power Systems. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2021, 36, 3840–3848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koivisto, M.; Maule, P.; Cutululis, N.; Sørensen, P. Effects of Wind Power Technology Development on Large-scale VRE Generation Variability. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Milan PowerTech, Milan, Italy, 23–27 June 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mehigana, L.; Deanea, J.P.; Gallachóira, B.P.Ó.; Bertsch, V. A review of the role of distributed generation (DG) in future electricity systems. Energy 2018, 163, 822–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, R. Protection and control technologies of connecting to the grid for distributed power resources. In Distributed Power Resources; Red Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019; pp. 121–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, X.; Yang, X.; Cai, J.; Jiang, X. Transient Protection Schemes for Transmission Lines Used in Offshore Wind Farm: A State-of-the-Art Review. Front. Energy Res. 2022, 10, 923168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Razavi, S.E.; Rahimi, E.; Javadi, M.S.; Nezhad, A.E.; Lotfid, M.; Shafie-khah, M.; Catalão, J.P.S. Impact of distributed generation on protection and voltage regulation of distribution systems: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 105, 157–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Papkov, B.; Gerhards, J.; Mahnitko, A. System problems of power supply reliability analysis formalization. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 5th International Conference on Power Engineering, Energy and Electrical Drives (POWERENG), Riga, Latvia, 1–13 May 2015; pp. 225–228. [Google Scholar]
- Kawady, T.A.; Mansour, N.M.; Taalab, A.M.I. Wind Farm Protection Systems: State of the Art and Challenges. In Distributed Generation; Gaonkar, D.N., Ed.; InTech: London, UK, 2010; pp. 265–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsili, M.; Papathanassiou, S. Review of grid code technical requirements for wind farms» school of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Renew. Power Gener. 2009, 3, 308–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joint Working Group C4/C6.35/CIRED. Modelling of Inverter-Based Generation for Power System Dynamic Studies; CIRED: Vienna, Austria, 2018; p. 72. [Google Scholar]
- Alaboudy, A.H.K.; Mahmoud, H.A.; Elbaset, A.A.; Abdelsattar, M. Technical Assessment of the Key LVRT Techniques for Grid-Connected DFIG Wind Turbines. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2023, 48, 15223–15239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alsmadi, Y.M.; Xu, L.; Blaabjerg, F.; Ortega, A.J.; Abdelaziz, A.Y.; Wang, A.; Albataineh, Z. Detailed investigation and performance improvement of the dynamic behaviour of grid-connected DFIG-based wind turbines under LVRT conditions. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2018, 54, 4795–4812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niu, L.; Wang, X.; Wu, L.; Yan, F.; Xu, M. Review of low voltage ride-through technology of doubly-fed induction generator. J. Eng. 2019, 3, 3106–3108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duong, M.; Leva, S.; Mussetta, M.; Le, K.H. A Comparative study on controllers for improving transient stability of DFIG wind turbines during large disturbances. Energies 2018, 11, 480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Din, Z.; Zhang, J.; Zhu, Y.; Xu, Z. El-Naggar an “Impact of grid impedance on LVRT performance of DFIG system with rotor crowbar technology”. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 127999–128008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benali, A.; Khiat, M.; Allaoui, T.; Denaï, M. Power Quality improvement and low voltage ride through capability in hybrid wind-PV farms grid-connected using dynamic voltage restorer. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 68634–68648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dosoglu, M.K. Enhancement of LVRT Capability in DFIG-Based Wind Turbines with STATCOM and Supercapacitor. Sustainability 2023, 15, 2529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohammadi, J.; Afsharnia, S.; Vaez-Zadeh, S. Efficient fault-ride through control strategy of DFIG-based wind turbines during the grid faults. Energy Convers. Manag. 2014, 78, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alaraifi, S.; Moawwad, A.; Moursi, M.S.E.; Khadkikar, V. Voltage booster schemes for fault ride through enhancement of variable speed wind turbines. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 2013, 4, 1071–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vrionis, T.D.; Koutiva, X.I.; Vovos, N.A. A genetic algorithm-based low voltage ride-through control strategy for grid connected doubly fed induction wind generators. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2014, 29, 1325–1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Herzog, F.; Röder, J.; De Doncker, R.W. Impact of DC link brake chopper design on the LVRT behavior of full-scale converter wind turbines. Forsch Ingenieurwes. 2023, 87, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, F.; Xia, Y.; Zhang, K.; Li, H.; Chen, K.; Li, P. Study on a small-signal analysis method for PMSG considering LVRT control and frequency regulation. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 2022, 16, 2154–2165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, A.; Li, R.Y.; Mohamed, Y. Mechanical Stress Comparison of PMSG Wind Turbine LVRT Methods. IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 2021, 36, 682–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Srivastava, P.K.; Tiwari, A.N.; Singh, S.N. Performance Analysis of PMSG based Wind Energy Conversion System with Different LVRT Enhancement Methods. Recent Adv. Electr. Electron. Eng. 2019, 13, 470–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gonzalez-Longatt, F.; RuedaJosé, J.L. PowerFactory Applications for Power System Analysis; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arya, A.; Mehroliya, S.; Mitra, U.; Gupta, S.; Singh, R.K.; Mundra, P. Design and Performance Analysis of Grid Connected Hybrid-Distributed Generation Using DIgSILENT PowerFactory. In Distributed Energy Systems; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2022; 308p. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamon, C.; Elkington, K.; Ghandhari, M. Doubly-fed induction generator modeling and control in DigSilent PowerFactory. In Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Power System Technology, Hangzhou, China, 24–28 October 2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ilyushin, P.V.; Shepovalova, O.V.; Filippov, S.P.; Nekrasov, A.A. The effect of complex load on the reliable operation of solar photovoltaic and wind power stations integrated into energy systems and into off-grid energy areas. Energy Rep. 2022, 8, 1515–1529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ilyushin, P.; Volnyi, V.; Suslov, K.; Filippov, S. State-of-the-Art Literature Review of Power Flow Control Methods for Low-Voltage AC and AC-DC Microgrids. Energies 2023, 16, 3153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, D.; Zhang, W.; Netsanet Alemu, S.; Wang, P.; Bitew, G.T.; Wei, D.; Yue, J. Key technical challenges in protection and control of microgrid. In Microgrid Protection and Control; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2021; pp. 45–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ilyushin, P.V.; Filippov, S.P. Under-frequency load shedding strategies for power districts with distributed generation. In Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Industrial Engineering, Applications and Manufacturing (ICIEAM), Sochi, Russia, 25–29 March 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ilyushin, P.; Volnyi, V.; Suslov, K.; Filippov, S. Review of Methods for Addressing Challenging Issues in the Operation of Protection Devices in Microgrids with Voltages of up to 1 kV That Integrates Distributed Energy Resources. Energies 2022, 15, 9186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vinod, M.; Devadasan, S.R.; Rajanayagam, D.; Sunil, D.T.; Thilak, V.M.M. Theoretical and industrial studies on the electromechanical relay. Int. J. Serv. Oper. Manag. 2018, 29, 312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, L.C.; Lu, Y. A Study of Eliminating the Protective Coordination Curve Intersection of Electromechanical Overcurrent Relays in Subtransmission Systems. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2013, 284–287, 2450–2462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muljadi, E.; Samaan, N.; Gevorgian, V.; Li, J.; Pasupulati, S. Short circuit current contribution for different wind turbine generator types. In Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 25–29 July 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Fischer, M.; Mendonca, A. Representation of variable speed full conversion Wind Energy Converters for steady state short-circuit calculations. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, Detroit, MI, USA, 7–10 May 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Murray, W.; Adonis, M.; Raji, A. Voltage control in future electrical distribution networks. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 146, 111100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ilyushin, P.; Filippov, S.; Kulikov, A.; Suslov, K.; Karamov, D. Intelligent Control of the Energy Storage System for Reliable Operation of Gas-Fired Reciprocating Engine Plants in Systems of Power Supply to Industrial Facilities. Energies 2022, 15, 6333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akagi, S.; Yoshizawa, S.; Ito, M.; Fujimoto, Y.; Miyazaki, T.; Hayashi, Y.; Tawa, K.; Hisada, T.; Yano, T. Multipurpose control and planning method for battery energy storage systems in distribution network with photovoltaic plant. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2020, 116, 105485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shamarova, N.; Suslov, K.; Ilyushin, P.; Shushpanov, I. Review of Battery Energy Storage Systems Modeling in Microgrids with Renewables Considering Battery Degradation. Energies 2022, 15, 6967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prakash, K.; Islam, F.R.; Mamun, K.A.; Lallu, A.; Cirrincione, M. Reliability of Power Distribution Networks with Renewable Energy Sources. In Proceedings of the 2017 4th Asia-Pacific World Congress on Computer Science and Engineering (APWC on CSE 2017), Mana Island, Fiji, 11–13 December 2017; pp. 187–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kulikov, A.L.; Ilyushin, P.V.; Suslov, K.V.; Karamov, D.N. Coherence of digital processing of current and voltage signals at decimation for power systems with a large share of renewable power stations. Energy Rep. 2022, 8, 1464–1478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pinthurat, W.; Hredzak, B.; Konstantinou, G.; Fletcher, J. Techniques for compensation of unbalanced conditions in LV distribution networks with integrated renewable generation: An overview. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 2023, 214, 108932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Kind of Standard Disturbance | Ures Value at Short Circuit Point, p.u. | Range of Actual Values of tSC in 110–220 kV Distribution Network, s |
---|---|---|
Disconnection of a network component by the main protection in case of a single-phase short circuit with unsuccessful automatic reclosing | 0.6–0.7 Unom | 0.1–0.18 |
Disconnection of a network component by backup protection in case of a single-phase short circuit with unsuccessful automatic reclosing | 0.6–0.7 Unom | 0.5–2.5 |
Disconnection of a network component by the main protection in case of a three-phase short circuit with unsuccessful automatic reclosing | 0–0.1 Unom | 0.1–0.18 |
Disconnection of a network component by the main protection in case of a two-phase short circuit to earth with unsuccessful automatic reclosing | 0.3–0.4 Unom | 0.1–0.18 |
Disconnection of a network component by the main protection in case of a single-phase short circuit with a failure of one circuit breaker and the action of a breaker failure protection | 0.6–0.7 Unom | 0.4–0.5 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ilyushin, P.; Simonov, A.; Suslov, K.; Filippov, S. Ensuring Stable Operation of Wind Farms Connected to Distribution Networks. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 9794. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14219794
Ilyushin P, Simonov A, Suslov K, Filippov S. Ensuring Stable Operation of Wind Farms Connected to Distribution Networks. Applied Sciences. 2024; 14(21):9794. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14219794
Chicago/Turabian StyleIlyushin, Pavel, Aleksandr Simonov, Konstantin Suslov, and Sergey Filippov. 2024. "Ensuring Stable Operation of Wind Farms Connected to Distribution Networks" Applied Sciences 14, no. 21: 9794. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14219794
APA StyleIlyushin, P., Simonov, A., Suslov, K., & Filippov, S. (2024). Ensuring Stable Operation of Wind Farms Connected to Distribution Networks. Applied Sciences, 14(21), 9794. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14219794