A Longitudinal Study on the Adoption of Cloud Computing in Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises in Montenegro
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Cloud Computing Adoption in SMEs
1.2. Nationwide Context of SME Digitalization: Montenegro
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Research Problem
2.2. Methodological Approach
- A longitudinal study with repeated quantitative measures in 2017 and 2023, aimed at capturing changes in CC perception among Montenegrin SMEs (output 1);
- Semi-structured interview designed to understand causal factors and enrich the study with evidence-based findings, thereby enhancing the digital posture of Montenegrin SMEs (output 2).
2.3. Ethics and Procedure
2.4. Quantitative Measuring Instrument
2.5. Qualitative Measuring Instrument
2.6. Statistical Analyses
3. Results
3.1. Results of the Quantitative Study
3.1.1. Sample
3.1.2. Results of Research Questions
3.2. Results of the Qualitative Study
3.2.1. Technology Perspective
3.2.2. Organizational Perspective
3.2.3. Environmental Perspective
3.2.4. Individual Perspective
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Saucedo-Martínez, J.A.; Pérez-Lara, M.; Marmolejo-Saucedo, J.A.; Salais-Fierro, T.E.; Vasant, P. Industry 4.0 Framework for Management and Operations: A Review. J. Ambient. Intell. Humaniz. Comput. 2018, 9, 789–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Monteiro, P.; Pereira, R.; Nunes, R.; Reis, A.; Pinto, T. Context-Aware System for Information Flow Management in Factories of the Future. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 3907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Warner, K.S.R.; Wäger, M. Building Dynamic Capabilities for Digital Transformation: An Ongoing Process of Strategic Renewal. Long Range Plan. 2019, 52, 326–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Omrani, N.; Rejeb, N.; Maalaoui, A.; Dabić, M.; Kraus, S. Drivers of Digital Transformation in SMEs. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 2024, 71, 5030–5043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Katsinis, A.; Di Bella, L.; Laguera Gonzalez, J.; De Pedraza Garcia, P. SME Performance Review 2023; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Brodny, J.; Tutak, M. Analyzing the Level of Digitalization among the Enterprises of the European Union Member States and Their Impact on Economic Growth. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2022, 8, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nagy, M.; Lăzăroiu, G.; Valaskova, K. Machine Intelligence and Autonomous Robotic Technologies in the Corporate Context of SMEs: Deep Learning and Virtual Simulation Algorithms, Cyber-Physical Production Networks, and Industry 4.0-Based Manufacturing Systems. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 1681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Commission; Executive Agency for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises; Muller, P.; Devnani, S.; Ladher, R.; Cannings, J.; Murphy, E.; Robin, N.; Ramos Illán, S.; Aranda, F.; et al. Annual Report on European SMEs 2020/2021—Digitalisation of SMEs—Background Document; Hope, K., Ed.; Publications Office: Luxembourg, 2021; ISBN 978-92-9460-710-2. [Google Scholar]
- Ullrich, A.; Thim, C.; Vladova, G.; Gronau, N. Wandlungsbereitschaft Und Wandlungsfähigkeit von Mitarbeitern Bei Der Transformation Zu Industrie 4.0. In Industrie 4.0: Herausforderungen, Konzepte und Praxisbeispiele; Reinheimer, S., Ed.; Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden: Wiesbaden, Germany, 2017; pp. 91–115. ISBN 978-3-658-18165-9. [Google Scholar]
- Arivudainambi, D.; Kumar, K.V. Performance Analysis of Security Framework for Software Defined Network Architectures. Int. J. Adv. Appl. Sci. 2019, 2252, 8814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mell, P.; Grance, T. The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. Spec. Publ. 2011, 53, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goyal, S. Public vs Private vs Hybrid vs Community-Cloud Computing: A Critical Review. Int. J. Comput. Netw. Inf. Secur. 2014, 6, 20–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schneider, S.; Sunyaev, A. Determinant Factors of Cloud-Sourcing Decisions: Reflecting on the IT Outsourcing Literature in the Era of Cloud Computing. J. Inf. Technol. 2016, 31, 1–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, R.; Tafti, A.; Subramanyam, R. Internal IT Modularity, Firm Size, and Adoption of Cloud Computing. Electron. Commer. Res. 2023, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sanders, A.; Elangeswaran, C.; Wulfsberg, J.P. Industry 4.0 Implies Lean Manufacturing: Research Activities in Industry 4.0 Function as Enablers for Lean Manufacturing. J. Ind. Eng. Manag. JIEM 2016, 9, 811–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tarutė, A.; Duobienė, J.; Klovienė, L.; Vitkauskaitė, E.; Varaniūtė, V. Identifying Factors Affecting Digital Transformation of SMEs. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Electronic Business (ICEB), Guilin, China, 2–6 December 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Ulas, D. Digital Transformation Process and SMEs. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2019, 158, 662–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Melo, I.C.; Queiroz, G.A.; Junior, P.N.A.; de Sousa, T.B.; Yushimito, W.F.; Pereira, J. Sustainable Digital Transformation in Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs): A Review on Performance. Heliyon 2023, 9, e13908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Forsythe, E.; Kahn, L.B.; Lange, F.; Wiczer, D. Where Have All the Workers Gone? Recalls, Retirements, and Reallocation in the COVID Recovery. Labour Econ. 2022, 78, 102251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sein, M.K. The Serendipitous Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic: A Rare Opportunity for Research and Practice. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2020, 55, 102164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fletcher, G.; Griffiths, M. Digital Transformation during a Lockdown. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2020, 55, 102185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Priyono, A.; Moin, A.; Putri, V.N.A.O. Identifying Digital Transformation Paths in the Business Model of SMEs during the COVID-19 Pandemic. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2020, 6, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, M.W.; Lee, O.-K.; Lim, K.H. Knowledge Management Systems Diffusion in Chinese Enterprises: A Multi-Stage Approach with the Technology-Organization-Environment Framework. J. Glob. Inf. Manag. 2007, 17, 70–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Skafi, M.; Yunis, M.M.; Zekri, A. Factors Influencing SMEs’ Adoption of Cloud Computing Services in Lebanon: An Empirical Analysis Using TOE and Contextual Theory. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 79169–79181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Okaily, M.; Alkhwaldi, A.F.; Abdulmuhsin, A.A.; Alqudah, H.; Al-Okaily, A. Cloud-Based Accounting Information Systems Usage and Its Impact on Jordanian SMEs’ Performance: The Post-COVID-19 Perspective. J. Financ. Report. Account. 2023, 21, 126–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Q.; Wang, C.; Ren, K.; Lou, W.; Li, J. Enabling Public Auditability and Data Dynamics for Storage Security in Cloud Computing. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 2010, 22, 847–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Okaily, M.; Alghazzawi, R.; Alkhwaldi, A.F.; Al-Okaily, A. The Effect of Digital Accounting Systems on the Decision-Making Quality in the Banking Industry Sector: A Mediated-Moderated Model. Glob. Knowl. Mem. Commun. 2022, 72, 882–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, K.; Kraemer, K.L. Post-Adoption Variations in Usage and Value of e-Business by Organizations: Cross-Country Evidence from the Retail Industry. Inf. Syst. Res. 2005, 16, 61–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Awa, H.O.; Ojiabo, O.U. A Model of Adoption Determinants of ERP within TOE Framework. Inf. Technol. People 2016, 29, 901–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ogunshile, E.K.A. Leveraging Cloud Computing, Virtualisation and Solar Technologies to Increase Performance and Reduce Cost in Small to Medium-Sized Businesses. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Cloud Computing and Services Science (CLOSER 2018), Funchal, Portugal, 19–21 March 2018; pp. 310–321. [Google Scholar]
- Leinbach, T.R. Global E-Commerce: Impacts of National Environment and Policy, Edited by Kenneth L. Kraemer, Jason Dedrick, Nigel P. Melville, and Kevin Zhu. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Inf. Soc. 2008, 24, 123–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rath, A.; Kumar, S.; Mohapatra, S.; Thakurta, R. Decision Points for Adoption Cloud Computing in Small, Medium Enterprises (SMEs). In Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference for Internet Technology and Secured Transactions, London, UK, 10–12 December 2012; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2012; pp. 688–691. [Google Scholar]
- Al-Okaily, A.; Al-Okaily, M.; Teoh, A.P.; Al-Debei, M.M. An Empirical Study on Data Warehouse Systems Effectiveness: The Case of Jordanian Banks in the Business Intelligence Era. EuroMed J. Bus. 2022, 18, 489–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asatiani, A.; Apte, U.; Penttinen, E.; Rönkkö, M.; Saarinen, T. Impact of Accounting Process Characteristics on Accounting Outsourcing-Comparison of Users and Non-Users of Cloud-Based Accounting Information Systems. Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst. 2019, 34, 100419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jayeola, O.; Sidek, S.; Abd Rahman, A.; Mahomed, A.S.B.; Hu, J. Cloud Computing Adoption in Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs): A Systematic Literature Review and Directions for Future Research. Int. J. Bus. Soc. 2022, 23, 226–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dimitriu, O.; Matei, M. Cloud Accounting: A New Business Model in a Challenging Context. Procedia Econ. Financ. 2015, 32, 665–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rawashdeh, A.; Rawashdeh, B. The Effect Cloud Accounting Adoption on Organizational Performance in SMEs. Int. J. Data Netw. Sci. 2023, 7, 411–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nafi, K.W.; Kar, T.S.; Hossain, M.A.; Hashem, M. A New Trusted and Secured E-Commerce Architeture for Cloud Computing. In Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Informatics, Electronics and Vision (ICIEV), Dhaka, Bangladesh, 17–18 May 2013; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2013; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Vasiljeva, T.; Shaikhulina, S.; Kreslins, K. Cloud Computing: Business Perspectives, Benefits and Challenges for Small and Medium Enterprises (Case of Latvia). Procedia Eng. 2017, 178, 443–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rupavath, R.V.S.S.B. Small and Medium-Sized Businesses: Cloud Computing Acceptance And Readiness. J. Surv. Fish. Sci. 2023, 10, 2211–2215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Orzes, G.; Rauch, E.; Bednar, S.; Poklemba, R. Industry 4.0 Implementation Barriers in Small and Medium Sized Enterprises: A Focus Group Study. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), Bangkok, Thailand, 16–19 December 2018; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2018; pp. 1348–1352. [Google Scholar]
- Bak, G.; Reicher, R. Challenges of the smes in the 21st century. Sci. Pap. Silesian Univ. Technol. Organ. Manag. Nauk. Politech. Slaskiej Ser. Organ. Zarz. 2022, 10, 2211–2215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Müller, J.M.; Buliga, O.; Voigt, K.-I. Fortune Favors the Prepared: How SMEs Approach Business Model Innovations in Industry 4.0. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2018, 132, 2–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Horváth, D.; Szabó, R.Z. Driving Forces and Barriers of Industry 4.0: Do Multinational and Small and Medium-Sized Companies Have Equal Opportunities? Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2019, 146, 119–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cleary, P.; Quinn, M. Intellectual Capital and Business Performance: An Exploratory Study of the Impact of Cloud-Based Accounting and Finance Infrastructure. J. Intellect. Cap. 2016, 17, 255–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Calabrese, A.; Ghiron, N.L.; Tiburzi, L. Evolutions’ and ‘Revolutions’ in Manufacturers’ Implementation of Industry 4.0: A Literature Review, a Multiple Case Study, and a Conceptual Framework. Prod. Plan. Control 2021, 32, 213–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stentoft, J.; Wickstrøm, K.A.; Philipsen, K.; Haug, A. Drivers and Barriers for Industry 4.0 Readiness and Practice: Empirical Evidence from Small and Medium-Sized Manufacturers. Prod. Plan. Control 2021, 32, 811–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Birkel, H.S.; Veile, J.W.; Müller, J.M.; Hartmann, E.; Voigt, K.-I. Development of a Risk Framework for Industry 4.0 in the Context of Sustainability for Established Manufacturers. Sustainability 2019, 11, 384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kiel, D.; Arnold, C.; Voigt, K.-I. The Influence of the Industrial Internet of Things on Business Models of Established Manufacturing Companies—A Business Level Perspective. Technovation 2017, 68, 4–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dalenogare, L.S.; Benitez, G.B.; Ayala, N.F.; Frank, A.G. The Expected Contribution of Industry 4.0 Technologies for Industrial Performance. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2018, 204, 383–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khayer, A.; Talukder, M.S.; Bao, Y.; Hossain, M.N. Cloud Computing Adoption and Its Impact on SMEs’ Performance for Cloud Supported Operations: A Dual-Stage Analytical Approach. Technol. Soc. 2020, 60, 101225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ministry of Economic Development. Strategy for Regional Development of Montenegro 2014–2020; Ministry of Economic Development: Podgorica, Montenegro, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Draskovic, M.; Jovovic, R.; Draskovic, V.; Jovovic, N. Levels and Factors of Transitional Crisis in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, and Serbia. Econ. Sociol. 2017, 10, 21–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ministry of Economic Development. Strategy for Regional Development of Montenegro 2023–2027; Ministry of Economic Development: Podgorica, Montenegro, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Zuzaku, A.; Abazi, B. Digital Transformation in the Western Balkans as an Opportunity for Managing Innovation in Small and Medium Businesses—Challenges and Opportunities. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2022, 55, 60–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Regional Cooperation Council. Measures in Support of a Digital Agenda for the Western Balkans; Regional Cooperation Council: Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Ministry of Information Society and Telecommunications. Strategy for the Development of the Information Society of Montenegro until 2020; Ministry of Information Society and Telecommunications: Podgorica, Montenegro, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Montenegro—Preparing for Prosperity: Ensuring Sustainability, Connectivity, and Flexibility for Dynamic Growth 2012. Available online: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/637211468062650618/pdf/738260ESW0P1270port0Eng0Dec02702012.pdf (accessed on 1 July 2024).
- Božović, D. From the Protection of Critical Infrastructure to the Resilience of Critical Entities in Montenegro. Contemp. Maced. Def. Sovremena Makedon. Odbr. 2023, 23, 17–33. [Google Scholar]
- Ali, M.B.; Wood-Harper, T.; Mohamad, M. Benefits and Challenges of Cloud Computing Adoption and Usage in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review. Int. J. Enterp. Inf. Syst. IJEIS 2018, 14, 64–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bello, S.A.; Oyedele, L.O.; Akinade, O.O.; Bilal, M.; Delgado, J.M.D.; Akanbi, L.A.; Ajayi, A.O.; Owolabi, H.A. Cloud Computing in Construction Industry: Use Cases, Benefits and Challenges. Autom. Constr. 2021, 122, 103441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alouffi, B.; Hasnain, M.; Alharbi, A.; Alosaimi, W.; Alyami, H.; Ayaz, M. A Systematic Literature Review on Cloud Computing Security: Threats and Mitigation Strategies. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 57792–57807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akter, S.; Michael, K.; Uddin, M.R.; McCarthy, G.; Rahman, M. Transforming Business Using Digital Innovations: The Application of AI, Blockchain, Cloud and Data Analytics. Ann. Oper. Res. 2022, 308, 7–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sastararuji, D.; Hoonsopon, D.; Pitchayadol, P.; Chiwamit, P. Cloud Accounting Adoption in Small and Medium Enterprises: An Integrated Conceptual Framework: Five Factors of Determinant Were Identified by Integrated Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) Framework, Diffusion of Innovation (DOI), Institutional Theory (INT) and Extended Factors. In Proceedings of the 2021 the 2nd International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Industrial Management, Barcelona, Spain, 8–11 January 2021; pp. 32–38. [Google Scholar]
- Cai, C.; Chen, C. Optimization of Human Resource File Information Decision Support System Based on Cloud Computing. Complexity 2021, 2021, 8919625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shaikh, R.; Sasikumar, M. Trust Model for Measuring Security Strength of Cloud Computing Service. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2015, 45, 380–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hayajneh, S.; Hamada, M.; Aljawarneh, S. Project Management Knowledge Areas and Skills for Managing Software and Cloud Projects: Overcoming Challenges. Recent Adv. Comput. Sci. Commun. Former. Recent Pat. Comput. Sci. 2020, 13, 454–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cloud4SME@MNE: Market Oriented Research on SME Perspective about Cloud Computing Solutions in Montenegro. Available online: http://cloud4sme.me (accessed on 15 May 2024).
- ODDEA: Overcoming Digital Divide in Europe and Southeast Asia. Available online: https://oddea.org (accessed on 15 May 2024).
- Owalla, B.; Gherhes, C.; Vorley, T.; Brooks, C. Mapping SME Productivity Research: A Systematic Review of Empirical Evidence and Future Research Agenda. Small Bus. Econ. 2022, 58, 1285–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asad, M.; Bait Ali Sulaiman, M.A.; Ba Awain, A.M.S.; Alsoud, M.; Allam, Z.; Asif, M.U. Green Entrepreneurial Leadership, and Performance of Entrepreneurial Firms: Does Green Product Innovation Mediates? Cogent Bus. Manag. 2024, 11, 2355685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Satar, M.; Alharthi, S.; Asad, M.; Alenazy, A.; Asif, M.U. The Moderating Role of Entrepreneurial Networking between Entrepreneurial Alertness and the Success of Entrepreneurial Firms. Sustainability 2024, 16, 4535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. JAMA 2013, 310, 2191–2194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Salwén, H. Research Ethical Norms, Guidance and the Internet. Sci. Eng. Ethics 2021, 27, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chamber of Economy of Montenegro. Analysis of the Operations of the Montenegrin Economy in 2023. 2023. Available online: https://komora.me/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/cg-privreda-2023-3.pdf (accessed on 1 July 2024).
- Yigitbasioglu, O.M. External Auditors’ Perceptions of Cloud Computing Adoption in Australia. Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst. 2015, 18, 46–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- DiCicco-Bloom, B.; Crabtree, B.F. The Qualitative Research Interview. Med. Educ. 2006, 40, 314–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Union Agency for Cybersecurity. Cloud Computing—SME Survey; European Union Agency for Cybersecurity: Athens, Greece, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Elhusseiny, H.M.; Crispim, J. SMEs, Barriers and Opportunities on Adopting Industry 4.0: A Review. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2022, 196, 864–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, Y.-W. What Drives Organizations to Switch to Cloud ERP Systems? The Impacts of Enablers and Inhibitors. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 2020, 33, 600–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Venkatesh, V.; Morris, M.G.; Davis, G.B.; Davis, F.D. User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Q. 2003, 27, 425–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramdani, B.; Kawalek, P.; Lorenzo, O. Predicting SMEs’ Adoption of Enterprise Systems. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 2009, 22, 10–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tongsuksai, S.; Mathrani, S.; Weerasinghe, K. Influential Characteristics and Benefits of Cloud ERP Adoption in New Zealand SMEs: A Vendors’ Perspective. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 23956–23979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, P.; Seetharaman, A.; Raj, J.R. The Usage and Adoption of Cloud Computing by Small and Medium Businesses. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2013, 33, 861–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oliveira, T.; Thomas, M.; Espadanal, M. Assessing the Determinants of Cloud Computing Adoption: An Analysis of the Manufacturing and Services Sectors. Inf. Manag. 2014, 51, 497–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jain, P. Cloud Adoption Strategies for Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs): A Comprehensive Guide to Overcoming Challenges and Maximizing Benefits. Sch. J. Eng. Technol. 2024, 1, 28–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, M.; Seo, M. Secure and Efficient Deduplication for Cloud Storage with Dynamic Ownership Management. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 13270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hussein Alghushami, A.; Zakaria, N.H.; Mat Aji, Z. Factors Influencing Cloud Computing Adoption in Higher Education Institutions of Least Developed Countries: Evidence from Republic of Yemen. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 8098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haddara, M.; Gøthesen, S.; Langseth, M. Challenges of Cloud-ERP Adoptions in SMEs. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2022, 196, 973–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benlian, A.; Hess, T. Opportunities and Risks of Software-as-a-Service: Findings from a Survey of IT Executives. Decis. Support Syst. 2011, 52, 232–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chonsawat, N.; Sopadang, A. Defining SMEs’ 4.0 Readiness Indicators. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 8998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Domański, R.; Wojciechowski, H.; Lewandowicz, J.; Hadaś, Ł. Digitalization of Management Processes in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises—An Overview of Low-Code and No-Code Platforms. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 13078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anim-Yeboah, S.; Boateng, R.; Odoom, R.; Kolog, E.A. Digital Transformation Process and the Capability and Capacity Implications for Small and Medium Enterprises. Int. J. E-Entrep. Innov. IJEEI 2020, 10, 26–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- AlBar, A.M.; Hoque, M.R. Factors Affecting Cloud ERP Adoption in Saudi Arabia: An Empirical Study. Inf. Dev. 2019, 35, 150–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Christiansen, V.; Haddara, M.; Langseth, M. Factors Affecting Cloud ERP Adoption Decisions in Organizations. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2022, 196, 255–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marinho, M.; Prakash, V.; Garg, L.; Savaglio, C.; Bawa, S. Effective Cloud Resource Utilisation in Cloud ERP Decision-Making Process for Industry 4.0 in the United States. Electronics 2021, 10, 959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Concept/Variable | Empirical Indicator | Cronbach’s Alpha Coefficient (Study 1) | Cronbach’s Alpha Coefficient (Study 2) |
---|---|---|---|
Level of information security | Categorical items (0—no, 1—yes). Ten items. Example: “A company has an official procedure for the management of physical safety of people and propriety”. | 0.837 | 0.791 |
Reasons for adopting cloud computing | Categorical items (0—no, 1—yes). Ten items. Example: “Removing economic/expertise barriers impeding the modernization of business processes by the introduction of information technology”. | 0.701 | 0.607 |
Perceived benefits of adopting cloud computing | Categorical items (0—no, 1—yes). Ten items. Example: “Reducing the cost of investment in new ICT solutions”. | 0.823 | 0.689 |
Perceived risks of adopting cloud computing | Four-point Likert scale items (1—not important; 4—extremely important). Twelve items. Example: “Losing control over services and/or information”. | 0.936 | 0.744 |
Perceived suitability of five cloud computing deployment models | Categorical items (0—no, 1—yes). Five items, considered separately: public cloud (ownership and management is entrusted to an independent company), private cloud (ownership and management by the cloud service providers), partner cloud (ownership and management entrusted to the partner), a set of different cloud sources (partnership, private, etc.); other | / | / |
Perceived suitability of five cloud layers | Categorical items (0—no, 1—yes). Five items, considered separately: the individual software packages (SaaS); complete operating system and software packages available in the cloud (PaaS); only infrastructure services, such as warehouse (storage space), network capacity, and so on. (IaaS); security cloud services; other | / | / |
Willingness to use multiple cloud service providers | Categorical items (0—no, 1—yes). Example: “Would you be willing to outsourcing services to several cloud providers?” | / | / |
Intention of employing nine types of cloud computing adoption | Categorical items (0—no, 1—yes). Nine items, considered separately: payroll, human resources, procurement CRM/retail, accounting and finance, project management, development of applications in the cloud, analysis of anonymous data, other | / | / |
Cluster | Influencing Factors | Source |
---|---|---|
Technological | Relative advantage | [82,83] |
Cost (capital costs, cost reduction) | [13,84,85,86] | |
Security and privacy | [86,87,88] | |
IT flexibility | [13,89] | |
Complexity | [88] | |
Technological availability | [13,89,90] | |
Organizational | Size and structure | [88,91] |
Top management support | [89] | |
Innovativeness | [24,88,91] | |
Prior technological experience | [24,90] | |
Service controlling | [92] | |
Supplier computing support | [24,91] | |
Usage frequency | [13] | |
Environmental | Competitive pressure | [93,94] |
Sector (main activity) | [24,95] | |
Market scope | [89] | |
Social influence | [24] | |
Individual | Trust | [13,84,86] |
Perceived usefulness | [13] | |
Perceived ease of use | [13] |
Study 1 | Study 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Category | Description | Frequency (n) | Percentage (%) | Frequency (n) | Percentage (%) |
Company size | Micro (1–9 employees) | 11 | 15.50 | 7 | 9.86 |
Small (10–50 employees) | 30 | 42.25 | 33 | 46.48 | |
Medium-sized (50–250 employees) | 30 | 42.25 | 31 | 43.66 | |
Main activity | Manufacturing and industry | 5 | 7.04 | 5 | 7.04 |
Finance services | 9 | 12.67 | 9 | 12.67 | |
Public sector and health | 12 | 16.90 | 12 | 16.90 | |
Private sector | 7 | 9.86 | 7 | 9.86 | |
ICT service | 8 | 11.27 | 8 | 11.27 | |
Retail | 6 | 8.45 | 6 | 8.45 | |
Other | 24 | 33.80 | 24 | 33.80 |
Study 1 | Study 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Category | Description | Frequency (n) | Percentage (%) | Frequency (n) | Percentage (%) |
Total number of computers in the company | Do not use computers | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 |
Up to 5 computers | 9 | 12.68 | 4 | 5.63 | |
5–10 computers | 3 | 4.22 | 4 | 5.63 | |
11–20 computers | 10 | 14.08 | 12 | 16.90 | |
21–50 computers | 23 | 32.39 | 24 | 33.80 | |
More than 50 computers | 26 | 36.62 | 27 | 38.03 | |
Applications used in the company | 70 | 98.59 | 71 | 100.00 | |
Skype | 30 | 42.25 | 41 | 57.7 | |
Company’s social networks | 31 | 43.66 | 46 | 64.79 | |
Blogs and microblogs | 9 | 12.68 | 9 | 12.68 | |
Microsoft Office | 65 | 91.55 | 65 | 91.55 | |
Enterprise resource planning (ERP) | 36 | 50.70 | 36 | 50.70 | |
Customer relationship management (CRM) | 19 | 26.76 | 4 | 5.63 |
No. of SMEs with Assessed Impact (% Out of 15) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Cluster | Impacting Factor | Medium and High | Low | Without Impact |
Cost reduction | 6 (40.00%) | 1 (6.67%) | 8 (53.33%) | |
Strategic impact | 7 (46.67%) | 6 (40.00%) | 2 (13.33%) | |
Technological | IT flexibility | 8 (53.33%) | 4 (26.67%) | 3 (20.00%) |
Technological availability | 10 (66.67%) | 0 (0.00%) | 5 (33.33%) | |
Security | 12 (80.00%) | 3 (20.00%) | 0 (0.00%) | |
Deferral option | 0 (0.00%) | 1 (6.67%) | 14 (93.33%) | |
Uniqueness | 0 (0.00%) | 10 (66.67%) | 5 (33.33%) | |
Asset specificity | 0 (0.00%) | 1 (6.67%) | 14 (93.33%) | |
Organizational | Service controlling | 2 (13.33%) | 3 (20.00%) | 10 (66.67%) |
Roles and responsibilities | 4 (26.67%) | 5 (33.33%) | 6 (40.00%) | |
Organization size | 0 (0.00%) | 6 (40.00%) | 9 (60.00%) | |
Complexity | 5 (33.33%) | 3 (20.00%) | 7 (46.67%) | |
Effort expectation | 6 (40.00%) | 1 (6.67%) | 8 (53.33%) | |
External know-how | 8 (53.33%) | 1 (6.67%) | 6 (40.00%) | |
Environmental | Energy efficiency | 2 (13.33%) | 0 (0.00%) | 12 (80.00%) |
Competitive pressure | 2 (13.33%) | 6 (40.00%) | 7 (46.67%) | |
Image | 3 (20.00%) | 3 (20.00%) | 9 (60.00%) | |
Subjective norm | 4 (26.67%) | 4 (26.67%) | 7 (46.67%) | |
Industry characteristics | 5 (33.33%) | 4 (26.67%) | 6 (40.00%) | |
Social Influence | 7 (46.67%) | 2 (13.33%) | 6 (40.00%) | |
Privacy | 9 (60.00%) | 0 (0.00%) | 6 (40.00%) | |
Individual | Trust | 4 (26.67%) | 5 (33.33%) | 6 (40.00%) |
Perceived usefulness | 5 (33.33%) | 5 (33.33%) | 5 (33.33%) | |
Perceived ease of use | 7 (46.67%) | 7 (46.67%) | 1 (6.67%) | |
Perceived security and safety | 9 (60.00%) | 1 (6.67%) | 5 (33.33%) |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ognjanović, I.; Šendelj, R.; Daković-Tadić, M.; Kožuh, I. A Longitudinal Study on the Adoption of Cloud Computing in Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises in Montenegro. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 6387. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14146387
Ognjanović I, Šendelj R, Daković-Tadić M, Kožuh I. A Longitudinal Study on the Adoption of Cloud Computing in Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises in Montenegro. Applied Sciences. 2024; 14(14):6387. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14146387
Chicago/Turabian StyleOgnjanović, Ivana, Ramo Šendelj, Milica Daković-Tadić, and Ines Kožuh. 2024. "A Longitudinal Study on the Adoption of Cloud Computing in Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises in Montenegro" Applied Sciences 14, no. 14: 6387. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14146387
APA StyleOgnjanović, I., Šendelj, R., Daković-Tadić, M., & Kožuh, I. (2024). A Longitudinal Study on the Adoption of Cloud Computing in Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises in Montenegro. Applied Sciences, 14(14), 6387. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14146387