Next Article in Journal
Wireless Traffic Prediction Based on a Gradient Similarity Federated Aggregation Algorithm
Next Article in Special Issue
Gesture Detection and Recognition Based on Object Detection in Complex Background
Previous Article in Journal
Complications Arising Due to Orthodontic Treatment—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Mobile Charging Sequence Scheduling for Optimal Sensing Coverage in Wireless Rechargeable Sensor Networks
 
 
Communication
Peer-Review Record

Frequency-Limited Model Reduction for Linear Positive Systems: A Successive Optimization Method

Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(6), 4039; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13064039
by Yingying Ren 1,2,* and Qian Wang 1,3
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3:
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(6), 4039; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13064039
Submission received: 23 February 2023 / Revised: 18 March 2023 / Accepted: 19 March 2023 / Published: 22 March 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

In this paper, the authors studied frequency-limited model reduction for positive linear systems. The manuscript is poorly organized, with unclear data, confusing results and poor-quality figures. More importantly, I see very few scientific results and little, if any, novelty. I suggest rejecting this manuscript.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This paper investigates a method to obtain a reduced-order model for linear positive systems within a frequency range.

The methodology defines the unknown matrices of the reduced model with frequency-limited h_inf specification as Bilinear Matrix Inequalities (BMIs). As a result, BMIs establish sufficient and necessary conditions for the existence of a reduced positive model.

The BMIs are decomposed and rewritten as the sum of linear and residual terms. Then, the authors propose a successive convex optimization algorithm to solve the equivalent BMIs to obtain the reduced-order model.

  

The overall paper is concise and the methodology describes in detail.

I don't have many comments or suggestions:

  1. Possibly more recent and relevant references on reduced-order models show that the topic is active.
  2. The introduction may be more descriptive as regards the pros and cons of survey methods.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

the paper is good , just improve the introduction about the history of the topic in the other researches.   

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

I thank the authors for clarifying certain points.  I suggest that this manuscript be accepted in its present form.

Back to TopTop