Next Article in Journal
Forecasting of NOx Emissions of Diesel LHD Vehicles in Underground Mines—An ANN-Based Regression Approach
Next Article in Special Issue
Estimation of Changes in Sediment Transport along the Free-Flowing Middle Danube River Reach
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Grinding Degree and Screw Rotation Speed on Sunflower Oil Pressing Process
Previous Article in Special Issue
Advances in Monitoring and Understanding the Dynamics of Suspended-Sediment Transport in the River Drava, Slovenia: An Analysis More than a Decade-Long
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Gradiometry Processing Techniques for Large-Scale of Aeromagnetic Data for Structural and Mining Implications: The Case Study of Bou Azzer Inlier, Central Anti-Atlas, Morocco

1
Geosciences Laboratory, Department of Geology, Faculty of Sciences, Ibn Tofaïl University, BP 133, Kénitra 14000, Morocco
2
Resources Valorization, Environment and Sustainable Development Research Team (RVESD), Department of Mines, Mines School of Rabat, Av Hadj Ahmed Cherkaoui, BP 753, Rabat 10090, Morocco
3
Research Team of Geology of the Mining and Energetics Resources, Faculty of Sciences and Technology, Hassan First University of Settat, BP 577, Settat 26000, Morocco
4
Laboratory of Intelligent Systems Georesources and Renewable Energies, Faculty of Science and Technology, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, BP 2202, Fes 30000, Morocco
5
Ministry of Energy Transition and Sustainable Development, Directorate of Geology, BP 6208, Rabat 10090, Morocco
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(17), 9962; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13179962
Submission received: 1 August 2023 / Revised: 27 August 2023 / Accepted: 27 August 2023 / Published: 4 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Geomorphology in the Digital Era)

Abstract

:
Due to its unique geographic and tectonic location, the Bou Azzer inlier has drawn increased interest in mining studies. The inlier’s basement structure remains subject to investigation meanwhile faults and igneous rocks affect the local geology. In order to comprehend the Bou Azzer inlier’s structure, we use aeromagnetic data. The edge enhancement method described in this work is based on the gradiometry tensor analysis (GTA) of aeromagnetic data, which yields estimated magnetic tensors, rotational invariants, horizontal invariants, computed strike lines, and Eigensystems. This study’s primary objective is to use GTA to define structural boundaries in complicated geological and tectonic environments. The vertical and horizontal positions of the geological border’s limits have been determined via analysis of the acquired answers. The borders of the anomalous sources are marked in space by the lowest eigenvalue. According to the research, the inlier demonstrates potential for further mineralization with regard to its complicated structure, which is mostly dominated by WNW-ESE, ENE-WSW, NE-SW and E-W trending lineaments with varying depths between 3.45 and 9.06 km. Certainly, the derived structural scheme has enabled the identification of various formations that may be favorable for the circulation of mineralizing fluids, facilitating the concentration of economically valuable mineral deposits, similar to existing metal reserves in the examined area.

1. Introduction

Enhancing the data to highlight key aspects is one of the main goals in the analysis of aeromagnetic data. In addition to providing information on lithological changes and structural trends, aeromagnetic prospecting also defines lateral changes in susceptibility contrast. Gradients themselves can be used to infer the properties of subsurface structures.
From a mining point of view, the Bou Azzer inlier hosts two important mines: the cobalt mine of Bou Azzer associated with the ophiolitic complex whose mineralization is in the form of lenses and veins, and the mine of Bleïda marked by the presence of significant copper indices in the form of lenses.
Aeromagnetic data are analysed using gradient tensor and other operators to identify many positions of the geological borders. The greatest amplitudes like horizontal gradients which can be replaced by horizontal components of gradient tensor were employed by [1] with the intention of identifying geologic near-vertical borders from aeromagnetic anomalies. The boundaries displayed the highest values signifying sharp disparities in lateral susceptibility. Gradiometers have enabled the recent ability to conduct measurements of all the tensor elements. For the purpose of distinguishing structural characteristics from potential field gradient tensor data, many mapping approaches have been devised. Researchers in [2] calculated the gravity–magnetic tensor invariants across a sophisticated model simulating a basement surface with both horizontal and vertical faults.
In the interest of estimating source depth, ref. [3] demonstrated that the greater negative eigenvalue is analogous to the greatest negative bend acquired from typical potential field anomalies. Geologic contacts were identified [4] by means of the horizontal gravity–magnetic gradient tensor. Horizontal gravity gradients that have been seen or calculated from magnetic data are used to define the eigenvalues of the Hessian matrix in [5,6,7] as described by a linear feature analysis. Refs. [8,9] imaged subsurface geology using invariants derived from horizontal gravity gradient components.
A method for using the gravity–magnetic gradient tensor was developed by [8]. According to [10], the eigenvector of the entire tensor gravity–magnetic gradient matrix that corresponds to the least eigenvalue may be used to predict the striking direction of quasi 2D entities. According to [11], the sub-vertical plugs, dikes, or diatremes connected to alkaline encroachments are imaged by the rotational and horizontal invariants of the gravity–magnetic gradient tensor. The different tensor components were merged into invariants by [12], who also specified information on geologic contact and body shape.
To identify the margins of anomalous sources, we compute and map strike lineaments (θ) using processed rotational invariants (I0, I1, I2) and horizontal invariants (Ih1, Ih2). This technique was used to construct the gradient tensor of the aeromagnetic data from Bou Azzer.

2. Geological Background

The Bou Azzer-El Graara Inlier (BAEI) (Figure 1A–C) is linked with two nearby depressions, Bou Azzer then El Graara, situated 45 km southwest of Ouarzazate city. It spreads approximately 20 km from Taznakht to Bleïda in a WNW-ESE direction. The Tissoukine and Tasla synclines surround it from the north and south, respectively. The BAEI was formed during the excavation of the Anti-Atlas Major Accident (AAMA), representing an amount of the earliest Pan-African seams.
In the southern inlier part, the Tachdamt-Bleïda Set, it is thought that remains of the Tonian platform came into existence on the northern border of the West African Craton (WAC). Based on recent tectonic and lithological classifications along with newly acquired geochronological information, it encompasses the most ancient rock formations within the BAEI. During this period of rifting, there is a distinctive emission of tholeiitic to alkaline basalts, initially approximated at 788 ± 10 Ma and more lately, around 883 Ma [13].
The Assif n’Bougmmane-Takroumt complex’s metamorphic rock formations stretch from west-northwest to east-southeast. These formations create separate elevated areas in Bou Azzer, Tazigzaout, Oumlil, and the primary elevated region of the Bougmmane massif situated in the Takroumt region, located north of the Tachdamt-Bleïda group. These metamorphic rocks were previously thought to belong to the Paleoproterozoic (PI) basement. However, recent geochronologic data suggest that they are younger and are now attributed to Cryogenian dates [14,15].
Figure 1. The location of the studied area (Bou Azzer inlier) at (A) The West African Craton level modified after [16] and (B) at the Anti-Atlas level modified after [16]. (C) Geological map of the study area modified after [15].
Figure 1. The location of the studied area (Bou Azzer inlier) at (A) The West African Craton level modified after [16] and (B) at the Anti-Atlas level modified after [16]. (C) Geological map of the study area modified after [15].
Applsci 13 09962 g001
They consist of amphibolites, metagabbros, augen gneiss, and micaschists in their lithology [15]. The protoliths of these rocks have geochronological dates ranging between 730 million years and 752 million years ago within the Tazigzaout Complex [17], and from 745 million years to 755 million years ago in both the Bou Azzer massif and the Oumlil massif [15]. Furthermore, there are extra geological characteristics, including a mafic intrusion within the Bougmmane Complex established 700 million years ago, along with two veins of micas leucogranodiorite in the Tazigzaout massif, dated at 705 million years ago and 701 million years ago [18], and another at 695 Ma in the Oumlil massif, which all cross-cut these rocks [15]. These findings suggest that an orthogneissification event occurred earlier than 700 Ma during the Lower Cryogenian period.
Similarly, to the northeastern side of the BAEI, within the Tichibanine-Ben Lgrad area, one can find rocks formed from volcanic arcs, including rhyolites, microgabbros and basalts, alongside volcano-sedimentary formations like cinerites, sandy siltstones, dacite and felsic tuffs. The dating of the dacite and felsic tuffs, using U/P on zircon, reveals ages of 767 million years and 761 million years, respectively [19].
Ref. [20] was the first to characterize the famed Neoproterozoic supracrustal ophiolite found at BAEI. It is composed of ophiolite slices from ultramafic to mafic, connected to mélanges of volcanic sediments that have been invaded by intrusions related to subduction [21]. Ultramafic cumulates of wehrlites, harzburgites and dunite lenses, and clinopyroxenolites, a crustal gabbroic unit’s section, basaltic pillow lavas a complex of sheeted dykes are all parts of the BAO series. The BAO and the Khzama orb in the Siroua window are examples of the pan-African oceanic lithosphere, which was thrust onto the northern boundary of the WAC (West African Craton) as stated in reference [22]. Its precise age remains a topic of debate despite various speculative indirect estimates [16].
However, the Khzama plagiogranite within the Siroua ophiolite provides the most accurate age estimation for the Central Anti-Atlas ophiolite, pinpointing it at 762 million years old [23]. Around 660 Ma to 640 Ma, a series of quartz diorite intrusions (located in the Bou Azzer massifs, Ousdrat, Taghouni, Ait Ahmane and Bou Frokh) intruded Cryogenian rocks in the Bouazzer region. These intrusions occurred during the Pan-African paroxysm, characterized by sinistral deformation [24].
The Bou Azzer-El Graara Cryogenian foundational layer is covered by non-metamorphic clastic and volcanic deposits from the Ediacaran period in an unconformable manner. The lower units encompass the Tiddiline and Bou Lbarod-Iouraghene Groups, formed approximately 625 million years ago, primarily consisting of andesite and ignimbrite within an active margin setting. Additionally, the age of Tiddiline deposits, defined by fault boundaries and interspersed with rhyolitic layers, date back 606 million years. Before the deposition of the 580 million year old Bleïda granodiorite in a later Pan-African transpressional event, the Tiddiline deposits experienced uplift and folding [25].
The Ouarzazate Group, a large volcano-sedimentary post-collisional complex, corresponds to the Upper Ediacaran period [15]. Within this time frame (580–570 million years ago), the Aourz geological background dominate with volcanic ignimbritic facies having a dacitic-rhyolitic formation, and the Jbels composition is branded by alternating andesitic rhyolites-ignimbrites and flows.
Above the Late Ediacaran Ouarzazate Group, there is a paraconformable overlay of rich-carbonate Adoudou composition. Taroudant Set, representing a transgressive unit from the Early Paleozoic to Late Proterozoic, comprises several marine deposits. Concurrently, the volcanic complex at Jbel Boho, known as Alougoum, was assigned an age ranging between 529 million years and 531 million years [26]. The Paleozoic succession persists with the Tata Group during the Cambrian period, succeeded by the internal Feijas, Tabanit, external Feijas, first and second Bani, as well as Ktaoua transgression groups spanning from the Cambrian to the Ordovician era.
Understanding the Mesozoic and Cenozoic evolution of the Anti-Atlas region is limited by the absence of relevant sedimentary successions. The Anti-Atlas has experienced the influence of various Lower Liassic mafic dykes aligned in a northeast-southwest direction, which are associated with the CAMP magmatic event, signifying the breakup of Pangea during the Triassic-Jurassic transition. Notably, the Foum Zguid dyke, which crosses the BAEI, stands out as the most prominent of these dykes.
The present Anti-Atlas topography emerged during the Neogene period, coinciding with the High Atlas uplift, following several burial and exhumation phases [27].

3. Material and Methods

3.1. Description of the Aeromagnetic Data

This study made use of geophysical data acquired during a comprehensive survey of Morocco, conducted by Canadian Fugro Airborne Surveys Corporation for MMETSD between October 1998 and May 1999 [28]. The survey was an integral component of the National Geological Mapping Project, encompassing the entire Anti-Atlas region.
The latter refers to a comprehensive initiative with two primary objectives: first, to enhance searching for minerals in the Anti-Atlas area, which stands out as one of the most important metallogenic regions in Morocco, and second, to consolidate geoscientific databases. The study made use of a high-resolution data collection generated from an aerial geophysical survey on the part of providing accurate structural and geology cartography of the research region. Specifically, this research focuses on aeromagnetic data obtained from a rectangular region measuring 40 km by 69 km surrounding the BAEI (Figure 1). The data were captured using an optically pumped cesium vapor magnetometer that operates using pumping, featuring a level of sensitivity of 0.01 nT, and a data collection frequency of 10 samples per second was applied.
For the airborne magnetic survey, the N30° E flying path was utilized, set apart at intervals of 500 m. The magnetic sensor’s height above the terrain was set to approximately 30 m, and the tie lines were perpendicular with N120° E direction, a spacing of 4000 m. These parameters allowed for the collection of a substantial amount of magnetic field data, covering a total distance of 5700 km. As an advantage of these survey settings, a high-resolution aeromagnetic survey of the research region was effectively conducted. The preliminary handling of the unprocessed data involved standard levelling, noise reduction, diurnal adjustment, and other essential steps.
The contractor performed the gridding of the magnetic data using the minimal curvature technique, yielding a standardized square grid with a grid spacing of 250 m (half of the line interval, regardless of the data sampling rate) [29]. Aeromagnetic maps of Bou Azzer Inlier Reduced to the north pole and the Residual Aeromagnetic map of Bou Azzer Inlier (Figure 2), computed by [28], were referenced using the southern Moroccan Lambert metric coordinate projection. The residual magnetic field performed by [28] shows a very agitated magnetic relief and a certain heterogeneity with the presence of several anomalies (Figure 2A), the observed class ranging from −900 nT to 1800 nT.

3.2. Gradiometric Tensor

Aeromagnetic assessments are frequently employed in geophysical local surveys aimed at unexploded ordinance surveillance, geology mapping, and mineral prospecting (UXO). Using a single total field magnetometer, aeromagnetic traditional surveys only yield assessments of the total magnetic intensity (TMI).
Different sensors provide precise measurements of the entire field gradient. These yields detailed data about shallow geological characteristics, which remain unaltered by diurnal fluctuations and the magnetic field background of the region. As an illustration of the gradient tensor measurement’s power, the Canadian Geological Survey initiated an aeromagnetic gradiometer program in Canada, developing short baseline aeromagnetic gradiometers back in 1975 [30,31,32].
In recent years, there has been the development of gradiometers that use superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs). These devices have been demonstrated to be successful for observing geomagnetic phenomena. IPHT Jena has successfully created and tested full tensor magnetic gradiometer systems based on LTSQUIDs (low-temperature superconducting quantum interference devices) for various targets [33,34].
Vector surveys offer significant advantages, and the interpretability of magnetic surveys is greatly improved through the use of the complete magnetic gradient tensor (MGT), This describes how the three field components change in space along three perpendicular axes. This comprehensive MGT opens up possibilities for applications like magnetic navigation, air anti-submarine warfare, UXO detection and more. As a result, multiple geophysical firms are in the process of creating complete-tensor magnetic gradiometer systems. However, there are additional engineering obstacles that need to be addressed to create a functional airborne SQUID gradiometer system [34].
The Magnetic Gradient Tensor (MGT) can be derived by transforming the potential field. Based on potential field theory, it is feasible to calculate the various potential fields and gradient elements overhead magnetic sources [35]. Consequently, gridded data for Total Magnetic Intensity (TMI) could be employed to generate the components of the gradient tensor [36].
The gradient tensor can alternatively be obtained by measuring the total-field gradients in either the vertical or horizontal directions [37]. There is no requirement to perform derivative operations, which could be unstable on Fourier domain, toward computing the gradient tensor from the total field gradient. Utilizing data on triaxial magnetic gradients allows for a more effective determination of gradient tensor components. However, in [37], triaxial aeromagnetic gradients were not taken into consideration, and instead, the observed vertical gradient was derived by means of the horizontal gradient.
While gradiometer (or tensor) data are becoming more prevalent, especially in aerial gravity surveys, magnetic data are still often collected as a single value [38]. Gradiometer data involve the collection of nine gradient magnetic or gravity values for each point, instead of just one overall field magnitude [39]. This implies that more data sets are available for modeling, which can aid in resolving ambiguity issues during the modeling process.

3.3. The Art of Gradient Tensor Analysis

Tensors are an extension to the concepts of scalars, vectors and matrices. A tensor is represented as an organized multidimensional array of numerical values. A practical example of this is the magnetic gradient tensor (Figure 3) [37]:
B = d B x d x d B x d y d B x d z d B y d x d B y d y d B y d z d B z d x d B z d y d B z d z = B x x B x y B x z B y x B y y B y z B z x B z y B z z
where Bx, By and Bz are: x, y and z magnetic field components. The sheer volume increase in measured data presents many opportunities for new input into source detection and forward modelling algorithms.
Tensors can be categorized based on their rank or order [40]. This categorization is evident in the count of components that a tensor has within an N-dimensional space. Hence, a tensor with order p comprises Np components.
For instance, in a three-dimensional Euclidean space, the number of components in a tensor is 3p. From this, for example:
A zero-order tensor (p = 0) contains a single element and is referred to as a scalar. Physical quantities that only possess magnitude are depicted using scalars;
A tensor of order one (p = 1) consists of three elements and is termed a vector. Quantities that encompass both magnitude and direction are depicted using vectors. Bx is an example of a first rank tensor component;
A tensor of order two (p = 2) comprises nine elements and is commonly illustrated using a matrix. B x x = d B x d x is an example of a second rank tensor component;
A tensor of order three (p = 3) has twenty-seven components. B x x y = d 2 B x d x   d y is an example of a third rank tensor component.
A structure tensor is a matrix derived from the gradient of a function. It is a second order tensor (Figure 3) (has components such as Bxy), and has 2D and 3D forms (can be represented by either two or three variables). The 3D form is used in gradiometer surveys. Assume that B is a function of three variables (x, y, z). We can recognize that since H = φ , this implies that (in SI units) B x = μ 0 d φ d x , B y = μ 0 d φ d y , B z = μ 0 d φ d z Therefore, the structure tensor would be [41]:
B = μ 0 φ = d d x d d y d d z μ 0 d φ d x μ 0 d φ d y μ 0 d φ d z = μ 0 d 2 φ d x 2 d 2 φ d x d y d 2 φ d x d z d 2 φ d y d x d 2 φ d y 2 d 2 φ d y d z d 2 φ d z d x d 2 φ d z d y d 2 φ d z 2
B = B x x B x y B x z B y x B y y B y z B z x B z y B z z
where ⊗ is the dyadic product. Since the magnetic field represents a gradient of potential, where the tensor elements correspond to second-order derivatives of the scalar potential (φ). As a result, the tensor components exhibit symmetry. Therefore:
B x y = B y x ,   B y z = B z y ,   B x z = B z x  
According to Laplace’s equation:
2 φ = 0
× B = 0
From this it can be seen that:
B x x + B y y + B z z = 0
Based on previous equations we have:
B = B x x B x y B x z B y x B y y B y z B z x B z y B z z = B x x B x y B x z B x y B y y B y z B x z B y z B x x B y y
This means that there exist only five distinct and unconnected tensor components with magnetic and gravity data. For magnetic data these are Bxx, Bxy, Bxz, Byy, Byz.
Refs. [42,43] explore a different type of tensor representation that is based on amplitudes and phases.
A tensor measurement can be transformed using eigenvalues and eigenvectors. Each reading is divided into its orthogonal rotation matrix, invariant eigenvalue amplitudes, and local to the survey reference frame eigenvectors. The amplitude and phase of the tensor are represented by the eigenvalue amplitudes and eigenvector rotations. The amplitude-phase form respects the inherent physical features of tensors while enabling extremely quick and reliable processing of tensor data.
A thorough summary of eigenvector analysis of the tensor is provided by [36]. The link between these values is as follows if we define a tensor measurement as the matrix B with a scalar eigenvalue and eigenvector ν:
B v = λ v
The eigenvalues are determined through the solution of the characteristic equation. Det(BλI). Expanding this, we get:
λ 3 + I 1 λ I 2 = 0
where:
I 1 = B y y B z z + B x x B y y + B z z B x x B x y 2 B y y 2 = λ 1 λ 2 + λ 1 λ 3 + λ 2 λ 3 = λ 1 2 + λ 2 2 + λ 3 2 2  
I 2 = det B = B x x B y y B z z + B x x B y z 2 + B z z B x y 2 2 B x y B x z B y z B x y 2 = λ 1 λ 2 λ 3
where λ 1 λ 2 λ 3 . Applying eigenvector analysis to our tensor equation, as shown in the previous equation, we obtain 3 eigenvalues and 3 eigenvectors. The rotation matrix R which has as its columns the eigenvectors ν 1 ^ , ν 2 ^ ,   ν 3 ^ , diagonalises B when applied to it. It is straightforward to verify that the following holds:
R T B R = R T B x x B x y B x z B y x B y y B y z B z x B z y B z z R = λ 1 λ 2 λ 3
The eigenvalues, and any combination thereof, are the tensor rotational invariants. [36] makes extensive use of one such rotational invariant, specifically, the standardized source magnitude. It is defined as:
μ n s s = λ 2 2 λ 1 λ 3
In contrast to magnitude of the tensor (Frobenius norm) |B|, ref. [36] notes that it is entirely isotropic in the vicinity of a dipole source. It is perfect for inverse operation (total magnetic field calculation).
As a result, the previous formulation may be used to determine the horizontal invariants of the FTG map the edge of units (Figure 4). They are characterized as:
I h 1 = B x z 2 + B y z 2
I h 2 = B x y 2 + B y y B x x 2 2
The gradient tensor determinant of 2-D structures, according to [10], is equal to zero. The first system for which the x-axis corresponds with the strike direction will be obtained if the coordinate system is then rotated such that it lines up with the striking direction., the element 2 g x 2 becomes zero. Although this does not really occur in practice, the optimal striking direction can be identified if the matrix is rotated around the z-axis to decrease this component. You may compute this rotation angle [44,45,46] (Figure 5) using:
θ = 1 2 arctan 2 B x y B x x + B y y + B x z B y z B x x 2 B y y 2 + B x z 2 B y z 2

4. Results and Discussion

4.1. Bou Azzer Magnetic Field

Given the great geological and structural complexity of the region, the residual magnetic field map shows a variety of anomalies. Thus, after examining the residual Aeromagnetic map of Bou Azzer inlier (Figure 2A) we notice the presence of a large bipolar anomaly-oriented WNW-ESE, which runs along the central part of our study area, with a length exceeding 10 km. It is a linear anomaly with a positive pole more developed than the negative pole. In such a context at this latitude and with an inclination of the magnetic field which is around 45°, it is obvious that this structure has an NNE dip.
A second linear bipolar anomaly is situated in the eastern section of the inlier. It forms an elongated feature stretching in the northeast to southwest direction, covering approximately ten kilometers. It signifies a consistent continuation beyond the main geological formation. An additional set of anomalies was identified within the research area. These anomalies exhibit circular shapes and belong to a distinct group. The initial anomaly is positioned to the south of the central WNW-ESE structure within the geological formation. Its circular appearance suggests it might be a result of a basic magmatic intrusion. The second anomaly is situated to the southeast of the study region. Currently, it is challenging to differentiate among the various anomalies since all these formations exhibit significant consistency on both sides of their originating sources. As a result, the utilization of enhancement filters becomes crucial for accurately interpreting the aeromagnetic data. Hence, to ensure accurate comprehension, it is vital at this phase to employ a range of filters aimed at enhancing the analysis. This might involve attenuating prolonged wavelength anomalies in some cases or amplifying it in others.
Examination of the RTP map (Figure 2B), allowed for the detection of several linear and circular formations with varying amplitudes. In furtherance of perceiving their origin, the contours lines of the positive RTP data values were overlapped on the geological Bou Azzer inlier map (Figure 6). We will address each anomaly separately in the following sections. We will begin by interpreting the positive anomalies and then move on to the negative anomalies and those with lower intensity.
BAOA: This anomaly (Figure 2B) corresponds to the ophiolite complex of Bou Azzer which runs along the central part of our inlier along a WNW-ESE axis, showing a value greater than 2240 nT. The elevated magnetic susceptibility is attributed to the rock’s nature. As previously mentioned, the ophiolitic complex has undergone near-complete serpentinization, accounting for the heightened magnetic intensity observed within this formation. This axis is evidently shifted by several strike-slip faults.
FZDA: This anomaly (Figure 2B) corresponds to the famous Foum-zguid mafic dyke. It displays a value greater than 2000 nT (Figure 2A,B). This dyke is formed mainly by dolerites which explains its high magnetic susceptibility. The FZ dyke extends over more than 200 km along a linear NE-SW fracture. Its lower Jurassic age (Lias), suggests that it was formed during the opening of Tethys. This large dyke is an integral portion of the Central Atlantic Magmatic Province (CAMP) [47,48].
JBA: This anomaly showing a value of about 2100 nT (Figure 2B) is linked to the basic magmatism of Jbel Boho, then located south of the ophiolitic complex, this circular anomaly has been the subject of several studies. This magmatism is known for its richness in rare earth and copper which makes it one of the important districts in the inlier. The igneous formation includes a central syenitic core surrounded by extensive flows of volcanic lava, characterized as trachytes, andesites and basalts, which extend for tens of kilometers from the complex’s center. These volcanic stones are found within the lower portions of a sequence of carbonate rocks that were deposited at the same time [49].
BDA: This anomaly displaying a value of about 200 nT (Figure 2B) located SE of the inlier to the east of the FZ dyke, corresponds to the basic complex formed mainly by basalts which belongs to the Tachdamt-Bleïda platform, this anomaly sticks perfectly with the famous mining district of Bleïda marked by the presence of copper mineralization in the form of lenses.
AD: The negative magnetic anomaly (Ad) displaying a value of about −150 nT (Figure 2B), unquestionably represents the Adoudounian sedimentary cover. The negative values reflect the deep aspect of the said cover, it is a thick sedimentary filling having originated at the level of a deep sedimentary basin. This series, more than 2000 m thick here, rests unconformably on the series of the Ouarzazate Group [16].
GN: The negative Gn anomaly displaying a value of about −400 nT (Figure 2B) located south of the ophiolitic complex is related to granitoids (quartz diorite) of upper cryogenic age. They occurred during the Pan-African deformation [15].
Zn: This anomaly displaying a value of about −50 nT (Figure 2B) located in the northwest fringe of the inlier and which is in the form of an arc with weak magnetic field values corresponds to the northeast limit of the Zenaga inlier (Zn).

4.2. Gradient Tensor Analysis of Bou Azzer Inlier

The approach employed (GTA) still performant in highlighting shallow formations in all directions (Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 7), thus its application allows us to highlight a basic complex (Bc) of the Tonian—Cryogenian series of Tachdamt-Bleïda which lies in the center between the ophiolitic complex of Bou Azzer and Jbel Boho. It is mainly composed of basalts, which explains its high magnetic susceptibility. Note also that a fragment of serpentinite known as Takeroumt’s (Tk) was also better understood by applying this gradient, the latter is associated with the Cryogenian oceanic subduction system. We also note the continuous interruption of the Foum Zguid dyke all along the NE-SW axis, which corroborates with the geological map, thus the responses obtained at the level of the Horizontal invariants reflect the deep character of said dyke. It is noted that the application of GTA allowed us to attenuate the noise effect.
Note that it is difficult at this stage to carry out a precise mapping of the study area given the great contrast that appears at the level of the gradient tensor maps, but one can easily detect a certain number of tectonic events having affected the study area. On the one hand, there is a slight offset at the level of serpentinites at the level of the Ait Ahmane sector. This is due to the presence of a fracture N70° with sinistral lateral rejection, it is acts of Irthem fault (Figure 4 and Figure 7). On the other hand, we have detected at the level of the Foum Zguid dyke a fracture oriented N120 with a sinistral component which corresponds to the AMAA. We note that throughout the ophiolitic complex several fractures appear (Figure 7), they are mainly oriented N40 to N60 with a left lateral strike-slip movement. Note that throughout the northern part of the ophiolitic complex, we notice the presence of a strong negative vertical gradient which can probably be attributed to the Anti-Atlas Major Accident (Figure 3).
Meanwhile, the GTA enables us to separate closely spaced bodies and allows clear visualization of the plunging bodies, which will allow us to determine the plunging direction. The aforementioned GTA will help locate the maxima above the causative sources. Therefore, it will ensure a good visualization of magmatic intrusions, especially those of a basic nature as present in the study area (Figure 7A).
We note that the aforementioned study region is distinguished by the presence of a famous ophiolitic complex, with 70% serpentinization. The obtained results (Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 7A) easily allow one to identify the anomalies of high magnetic susceptibility. Through the analysis of the map, we observe that the Bou Azzer complex represents a solitary serpentine structure along the WNW-ESE axis, confirming the fragmented nature of said ophiolitic complex. It is worth noting that the aforementioned complex exhibits a northward plunging direction. Similarly, we observe a lateral continuity towards the west of the Takeroumt’s serpentinite fragment.
Also, GTA allows the balancing of anomalies originating from both shallow and deep origins and to accentuate specific features of interest (Figure 5 and Figure 7A), such as the edges of magnetic bodies. GTA can emphasize the edges of the anomalies identified in the Bou Azzer sector. We would like to point out that the cobaltiferous and nickeliferous mineralization is located at the contact between the ophiolitic complex, in other words, between high-amplitude anomalies and the surrounding rocks. Hence, it is important to map these contacts. This method exhibits remarkable traits, as it generates peak amplitudes at the edges of the source and equalizes signals originating from both shallow and deep sources. The application of this method extends to both synthetic and real data. Its effectiveness is assessed by comparing it to other contour detection methods found in previous literature that rely on derivatives.
The black lines (Figure 3 and Figure 5) and the colored lines (Figure 7) demonstrate the undeniable effectiveness of our method in accurately indicating the location of the boundaries of causative bodies, even for anomalies caused by numerous intrusive sources. It is worth noting that the northern contact between serpentinites and basic rocks in the uplifted block shows a straight alignment, as does the southern contact. However, we must then emphasize that the most significant deposits are located on the southern interaction among quartz diorite and serpentinite. The application of GTA in the Bou Azzer uplifted block has yielded effective results. Thus, Figure 4 displays the amplitude maxima of horizontal invariants along the edges of the ophiolitic complex, marked by a tectonic contact with the surrounding rocks. In this case, regarding Figure 5, it becomes easy to identify the geological lineaments with theta map, enabling a better comprehension of the area’s tectonic history. The effect of depth has been observed in the extension of the ophiolitic complex in the north-western part of the uplifted block. From a structural standpoint, the major Anti-Atlas fault-oriented WNW-ESE is more clearly visible on the gradient tensor maps (Figure 3), snaking through the northern portion of the aforementioned ophiolitic complex. We emphasize that the contact between the basic magmatism of Jbel Boho and the surrounding rocks is subcircular (Figure 4). Therefore, we recall that the northern contact is marked by the presence of dolomitic beds from the lower Adoudounian, while the southern contact is marked by the presence of dolomites. For the Foum Zguid dyke, we note that the maxima are located on either side of the center of said dyke [28]. Then said maxima show an elongation along the NE-SW direction.

4.3. Structural Analysis

Examination of the first rose diagram (Figure 7B) shows that the observed geological faults extracted from the geological map are globally dispersed among main directions ENE-WSW, E-W and WNW-ESE. In return, the rose diagram relating to the magnetic lineaments shows that the latter are aligned in lightly diverse orientations, NE-SW, NW-SE and fewer ostensibly N-S. The noticeable contrast in these alignments can be associated with the underlying structural composition of the basement resulting from the magnetic interpretation. These structures are entirely hidden beneath Quaternary sediments, and consequently, they are not depicted on the geological map. Moreover, the coverage of the geophysical data exceeds the limits of the Bou Azzer inlier.
The NE-SW direction particularly represents strike-slip faults that cause a notable offset of the ophiolitic body.
The WNW-ESE to E-W (Figure 7C) directions are particularly evident in the inlier central zone, this is the main orientation of the Bou Azzer ophiolitic complex, these directions represent the faults inherited from the Pan-African orogeny and which were reactivated in the long term until the uplift by Variscan deformation [15,16]. It is a period marked by a generalized shortening, at the level of the central and eastern Anti-Atlas, so we are witnessing a reactivation of the Precambrian structures along the Major Anti-Atlas Accident which led to the raising of the inlier along a NW-SE axis [50].
The structural rose diagram (Figure 7D) shows that the lineaments display an E-W, NE-SW, WNW-ESE main trend and N-S less important direction.
The obtained results demonstrate that the studied region is prominent owing to its high structural complexity resulting from polyphase tectonics at the level of the Bou Azzer inlier.

4.4. Tectonic Implications

Regarding the structural analysis of the Bou Azzer inlier, we were able to highlight several fault families representing different tectonic episodes that affected the study area. It is noted that this variety of direction is the result of polyphase tectonics. As mentioned above, the obtained results revealed the following structures:
  • The family of faults showing directions N°020 and N°030 particularly concerns the old basement [51] (Figure 7B,C).
  • Faults N°020, N°040, N°060, N°070, N°100, N°120, N°130 and N°140 mainly affect Upper Proterozoic formations [52] (Figure 7B,C).
  • The Infracambrian and Paleozoic cover formations are affected by families, N°020, N°030, N°060 and N°070 [15] (Figure 7B,C).
Studies conducted by various authors [15,16,51,52] have concluded that:
The main Pan-African B1 phase is marked mainly by the N030° to N050° dextral faults and by the N140 to N160° sinistral faults. This phase is responsible for the exhumation of the ophiolitic complex by the process of obduction. This is a WNW-ESE-oriented compression phase.
The late main Pan-African phase B2 is distinguished by a significant tightening at the level of the inlier, thus we find two large families of faults: the family N°150° to 160° dextral strike-slip, and a family N°70 sinistral strike-slip. The tightening is oriented N020° to N030°.
The post Pan-African period is marked by a distensive phase, giving rise to faults oriented N70°. This phase is marked by the formation of grabens with detrital filling. This phase is followed by a major extensive phase marked by normal synsedimentary faults N20° and N70°.
The Hercynian phase corresponds to a period of reactivation of the N70° faults. This is a compressive event marked by a sinistral movement of these faults. The latter have dextral inverse NW-SE conjugates.

4.5. Mining Implications

In the Bou Azzer inlier, the structural study combining geological and geophysical data (GTA) has proven effective in analyzing the structural and geodynamic evolution of the inlier. Note that the majority of hydrothermal mineral deposit types seem to have originated from extensive hydrothermal systems often concentrated near significant crustal features (faults and crustal discontinuities) [53]. This is the case for the mineralization at the level of the Bou Azzer inlier which displays an intimate relationship with the Ophiolitic complex of Bou Azzer and surrounding rocks. This association suggests that a deeply embedded structure served as a conduit for concentrating mineral-rich fluids through the crust. Nevertheless, these substantial structures may not always be evident at the surface (e.g., the Carlin Trend) [54]. Therefore, the significance of employing gradient tensor analysis lies in its ability to identify these underlying formations that are not visible on the geological map.
The mineralized structures within the Bou Azzer mining district can be categorized into five primary orientations: East-West, West-Northwest to East-Southeast, Northeast-Southwest, Northwest-Southeast, and North-South. These orientations align with the magnetic lineaments that have been identified.
Cobaltiferous and nickeliferous mineralization in the Bou Azzer mining district preferentially developed in old tectonic breccia bodies located between serpentinites and magmatic intrusions (quartz diorites). This configuration testifies to the existence of old normal faults WNW-ESE having participated in the exhumation of deep mantle rocks. The contact between seawater and magmatic bodies leads to hydrothermal reactions at the origin of mineralogical transformations leading to the formation of both cobalt and nickel.
The WNW-ESE and ENE-WSW families represent the major pan-African accidents. They are sinistral in nature and linked to the compressive episode affecting the entire Anti-Atlas chain. The WNW-ESE trending faults represent drains for the circulation of hydrothermal fluids. Furthermore, the NE-SW and E-W trending lineaments constitute the structural framework in which the mineralization is situated.
It should be noted that the vein system at the level of the cobaltiferous deposit of Bou Azzer presents numerous movement criteria which diverge according to the orientation of the vein. Measurements taken in situ and ex situ have shown that the veins tend mainly from N10° to N70° E with a main dip towards W or NW, respectively, and values close to 60–80° (Figure 8). Indeed, the veins oriented N70° E are associated with a left lateral movement [55] (Figure 9A), while those oriented N-S present a right lateral movement [55] (Figure 9B).
The copper mineralization at the level of the Bleïda mining district located SE of the inlier is associated with brittle, secant faults on the Pan-African structures. These faults are in the N070° direction with left-lateral movement [56] (Figure 10).
Faults trending N110 at 130° are associated with a replay zone of Pan-African ductile structures [56] (Figure 10). These faults would constitute a feeder zone for copper-rich fluids then circulating in the N070° faults and precipitating copper sulfides along these faults.

5. Conclusions

The GTA conducted in the central Anti-Atlas, particularly in the Bou Azzer inlier, using high-resolution aeromagnetic data, proved beneficial and allowed us to address several issues. It identified several favorable areas for mineralization, and helped to solve part of the mystery regarding the polarity of the subduction plane.
The geophysical study with GTA in the Bou Azzer inlier revealed the presence of several positive and negative anomalies. The main positive anomaly, occupying the core region of the investigated area, is directly related to serpentinized oceanic rocks, while the other positive anomalies are associated with basic intrusions. The detected negative anomalies are closely related either to quartz diorites or to the Adoudounian sedimentary cover.
In terms of structural analysis, the investigation conducted using geological and geophysical data was able to confirm the results obtained in previous studies. Several fault families were identified, namely WNW-ESE and ENE-WSW families associated to the Pan-African episode, and the NE-SW family related to the post-orogenic episode, thus confirming the previously mentioned polyphase tectonics.
Regarding the mineralized structures, this study demonstrates that the vein system is undoubtedly controlled by the NE-SW faults, while the massive mineralization follow the WNW-ESE family. The Bou Azzer inlier lives up to its reputation as a premier metallogenic province, as the conducted study highlighted several zones that showed promising indicators, encouraging future detailed prospecting campaigns to confirm the obtained results.
The use of findings from previous studies like [20,24,57] has proven to be effective, as it has highlighted several promising zones characterized by high structural complexity and strong alterability. We have detected a zone closely related to mantle rocks known for their cobalt enrichment. Another zone has also attracted interest, as it is associated with the basic complex of the Tachdamt-Bleïda platform, where a copper mineralization in the form of lenses is present.
Therefore, we recommend tightening the grid spacing in future geophysical surveys to achieve higher resolution, and conducting reconnaissance drilling in the areas deemed favorable for mineralization. Additionally, we suggest applying other geophysical methods such as gravimetry, electromagnetism, and electrical surveys to accurately cross-reference different geophysical signatures.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.S., S.C., S.S. and A.M. (Ahmed Manar); methodology, A.S., S.S. and A.M. (Ahmed Manar); software, A.S., S.S., A.M. (Ahmed Manar) and A.M. (Abdelhalim Miftah); validation, A.S., S.C., S.S., A.M. (Ahmed Manar), Z.B. and A.M. (Abdelhalim Miftah); formal analysis, A.S., S.C. and S.S.; investigation, A.S.; resources, A.S.; data curation, A.S.; writing—original draft preparation, A.S., S.C. and S.S.; writing—review and editing, A.S., S.C., S.S., A.M. (Ahmed Manar), Z.B. and A.M. (Abdelhalim Miftah); visualization, A.S., S.S., A.M. (Ahmed Manar) and A.M. (Abdelhalim Miftah); supervision, S.C., S.S., A.M. (Ahmed Manar) and Z.B.; project administration, A.S.; funding acquisition, A.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Grauch, V.J.S.; Cordell, L. Limitations of Determining Density or Magnetic Boundaries from the Horizontal Gradient of Gravity or Pseudogravity Data. Geophysics 1987, 52, 118–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Foss, C.A. Mapping Basement Relief with Airborne Gravity Gradiometry. ASEG Ext. Abstr. 2001, 2001, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Oruç, B.; Sertçelik, I.; Kafadar, Ö.; Selim, H.H. Structural Interpretation of the Erzurum Basin, Eastern Turkey, Using Curvature Gravity Gradient Tensor and Gravity Inversion of Basement Relief. J. Appl. Geophys. 2013, 88, 105–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Won, I.J.; Murphy, V.; Hubbard, P.; Oren, A.; Davis, K. Geophysics and Weapons Inspection. To Dig or Not to Dig? That Is (at Least) One Question. Lead. Edge 2004, 23, 658–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. de Ridder, S.A.L.; Biondi, B.L. Ambient Seismic Noise Tomography at Ekofisk. Geophysics 2015, 80, B167–B176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. De Ridder, S.; Dellinger, J. Ambient Seismic Noise Eikonal Tomography for Near-Surface Imaging at Valhall. Lead. Edge 2011, 30, 506–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. De Ridder, S.A.L.; Biondi, B.L. Near-Surface Scholte Wave Velocities at Ekofisk from Short Noise Recordings by Seismic Noise Gradiometry. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2015, 42, 7031–7038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Murphy, C.A.; Brewster, J. Target Delineation Using Full Tensor Gravity Gradiometry Data. ASEG Ext. Abstr. 2007, 2007, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Murphy, C.A.; Dickinson, J.L. Exploring Exploration Play Models with FTG Gravity Data. In Proceedings of the 11th SAGA Biennial Technical Meeting and Exhibition; European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, Swaziland, South Africa, 16–18 September 2009; p. cp-241-00020. [Google Scholar]
  10. Beiki, M.; Pedersen, L.B. Eigenvector Analysis of Gravity Gradient Tensor to Locate Geologic Bodies. Geophysics 2010, 75, I37–I49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mataragio, J.; Kieley, J. Application of Full Tensor Gradient Invariants in Detection of Intrusion-Hosted Sulphide Mineralization: Implications for Deposition Mechanisms. First Break 2009, 27, 95–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Murphy, C.; Dickinson, J.; Salem, A. Depth Estimating Full Tensor Gravity Data with the Adaptive Tilt Angle Method. ASEG Ext. Abstr. 2012, 2012, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bouougri, E.H.; Lahna, A.A.; Tassinari, C.C.G.; Basei, M.A.S.; Youbi, N.; Admou, H.; Saquaque, A.; Boumehdi, M.A.; Maacha, L. Time Constraints on Early Tonian Rifting and Cryogenian Arc Terrane-Continent Convergence along the Northern Margin of the West African Craton: Insights from SHRIMP and LA-ICP-MS Zircon Geochronology in the Pan-African Anti-Atlas Belt (Morocco). Gondwana Res. 2020, 85, 169–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hefferan, K.; Soulaimani, A.; Samson, S.D.; Admou, H.; Inglis, J.; Saquaque, A.; Latifa, C.; Heywood, N. A Reconsideration of Pan African Orogenic Cycle in the Anti-Atlas Mountains, Morocco. J. Afr. Earth Sci. 2014, 98, 34–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Blein, O.; Baudin, T.; Chèvremont, P.; Soulaimani, A.; Admou, H.; Gasquet, P.; Cocherie, A.; Egal, E.; Youbi, N.; Razin, P.; et al. Geochronological Constraints on the Polycyclic Magmatism in the Bou Azzer-El Graara Inlier (Central Anti-Atlas Morocco). J. Afr. Earth Sci. 2014, 99, 287–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Soulaimani, A.; Ouanaimi, H.; Saddiqi, O.; Baidder, L.; Michard, A. The Anti-Atlas Pan-African Belt (Morocco): Overview and Pending Questions. Comptes Rendus-Geosci. 2018, 350, 279–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. El Hadi, H.; Simancas, J.F.; Martínez-Poyatos, D.; Azor, A.; Tahiri, A.; Montero, P.; Fanning, C.M.; Bea, F.; González-Lodeiro, F. Structural and Geochronological Constraints on the Evolution of the Bou Azzer Neoproterozoic Ophiolite (Anti-Atlas, Morocco). Precambrian Res. 2010, 182, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. D’Lemos, R.S.; Inglis, J.D.; Samson, S.D. A Newly Discovered Orogenic Event in Morocco: Neoproterozic Ages for Supposed Eburnean Basement of the Bou Azzer Inlier, Anti-Atlas Mountains. Precambrian Res. 2006, 147, 65–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Souiri, M.; Aissa, M.; Góis, J.; Oulgour, R.; Mezougane, H.; El Azmi, M.; Moussaid, A. Application of Multivariate Statistics and Geostatistical Techniques to Identify the Distribution Modes of the Co, Ni, As and Au-Ag Ore in the Bou Azzer-East Deposits (Central Anti-Atlas Morocco). Econ. Environ. Geol. 2020, 53, 363–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Leblanc, M. Proterozoic Oceanic Crust at Bou Azzer. Nature 1976, 261, 34–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hodel, F.; Triantafyllou, A.; Berger, J.; Macouin, M.; Baele, J.M.; Mattielli, N.; Monnier, C.; Trindade, R.I.F.; Ducea, M.N.; Chatir, A.; et al. The Moroccan Anti-Atlas Ophiolites: Timing and Melting Processes in an Intra-Oceanic Arc-Back-Arc Environment. Gondwana Res. 2020, 86, 182–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Admou, H.; Juteau, T. Decouverte d’un Systeme Hydrothermal Oceanique Fossile Dans l’ophiolite Antecambrienne de Khzama (Massif Du Siroua, Anti-Atlas Marocain). Comptes Rendus l’Academie Sci. -Ser. IIa Sci. la Terre des Planetes 1998, 327, 335–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Samson, S.D.; Inglis, J.D.; D’Lemos, R.S.; Admou, H.; Blichert-Toft, J.; Hefferan, K. Geochronological, Geochemical, and Nd-Hf Isotopic Constraints on the Origin of Neoproterozoic Plagiogranites in the Tasriwine Ophiolite, Anti-Atlas Orogen, Morocco. Precambrian Res. 2004, 135, 133–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Walsh, G.J.; Benziane, F.; Aleinikoff, J.N.; Harrison, R.W.; Yazidi, A.; Burton, W.C.; Quick, J.E.; Saadane, A. Neoproterozoic Tectonic Evolution of the Jebel Saghro and Bou Azzer-El Graara Inliers, Eastern and Central Anti-Atlas, Morocco. Precambrian Res. 2012, 216–219, 23–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Inglis, J.D.; D’Lemos, R.S.; Samson, S.D.; Admou, H. Geochronological Constraints on Late Precambrian Intrusion, Metamorphism, and Tectonism in the Anti-Atlas Mountains. J. Geol. 2005, 113, 439–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gasquet, D.; Levresse, G.; Cheilletz, A.; Azizi-Samir, M.R.; Mouttaqi, A. Contribution to a Geodynamic Reconstruction of the Anti-Atlas (Morocco) during Pan-African Times with the Emphasis on Inversion Tectonics and Metallogenic Activity at the Precambrian-Cambrian Transition. Precambrian Res. 2005, 140, 157–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Fekkak, A.; Ouanaimi, H.; Michard, A.; Soulaimani, A.; Ettachfini, E.M.; Berrada, I.; El Arabi, H.; Lagnaoui, A.; Saddiqi, O. Thick-Skinned Tectonics in a Late Cretaceous-Neogene Intracontinental Belt (High Atlas Mountains, Morocco): The Flat-Ramp Fault Control on Basement Shortening and Cover Folding. J. Afr. Earth Sci. 2018, 140, 169–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Soulaimani, A.; Chakiri, S.; Soulaimani, S.; Manar, A.; Bejjaji, Z.; Miftah, A.; Zerdeb, M.A.; Zidane, Y.; Boualoul, M.; Muzirafuti, A. Semi-Automatic Image Processing System of Aeromagnetic Data for Structural and Mining Investigations (Case of Bou Azzer Inlier, Central Anti-Atlas, Morocco). Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 11270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Smith, W.H.F.; Wessel, P. Gridding with Continuous Curvature Splines in Tension. Geophysics 1990, 55, 293–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Nelson, J.B.; Marcotte, D.L.; Hardwick, C.D. Comments on “Magnetic Field Gradients and Their Uses in the Study of the Earth’s Magnetic Field” by Harrison and Southam. J. Geomagn. Geoelectr. 1992, 44, 367–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hardwick, C.D. Gradient-Enhanced Total Field Gridding. In Proceedings of the 1999 SEG Annual Meeting, Houston, TX, USA, 31 October–5 November 1999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hardwick, C.D. Aeromagnetic Gradiometry in 1995. Explor. Geophys. 1996, 27, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Schneider, M.; Stolz, R.; Linzen, S.; Schiffler, M.; Chwala, A.; Schulz, M.; Dunkel, S.; Meyer, H.G. Inversion of Geo-Magnetic Full-Tensor Gradiometer Data. J. Appl. Geophys. 2013, 92, 57–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Stolz, R.; Schiffler, M.; Becken, M.; Thiede, A.; Schneider, M.; Chubak, G.; Marsden, P.; Bergshjorth, A.B.; Schaefer, M.; Terblanche, O. SQUIDs for Magnetic and Electromagnetic Methods in Mineral Exploration. Miner. Econ. 2022, 35, 467–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Blakely, R.J. Potential Theory in Gravity and Magnetic Applications; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Clark, D.A. New Methods for Interpretation of Magnetic Vector and Gradient Tensor Data I: Eigenvector Analysis and the Normalised Source Strength. Explor. Geophys. 2012, 43, 267–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hinze, W.J.; Von Frese, R.R.B. Magnetics in Geoexploration. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. -Earth Planet. Sci. 1990, 99, 515–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Fitzgerald, D.; Argast, D.; Holstein, H. Further Developments with Full Tensor Gradiometry Datasets. ASEG Ext. Abstr. 2009, 2009, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Argast, D.; FitzGerald, D.; Holstein, H.; Stolz, R.; Chwala, A. Compensation of the Full Magnetic Tensor Gradient Signal. ASEG Ext. Abstr. 2010, 2010, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kolecki, J.C. An Introduction to Tensors for Students of Physics and Engineering; NASA: Washington, DC, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  41. Heath, P.; Heinson, G.; Greenhalgh, S. Some Comments on Potential Field Tensor Data. Explor. Geophys. 2003, 34, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wilson, G.A.; Cuma, M.; Zhdanov, M.S. Large-Scale 3D Inversion of Airborne Potential Field Data. In Proceedings of the 73rd EAGE Conference and Exhibition Incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2011, Vienna, Austria, 23–27 May 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Holstein, H.; Fitzgerald, D.; Willis, C.P.; Foss, C. Magnetic Gradient Tensor Eigen-Analysis for Dyke Location. In Proceedings of the 73rd EAGE Conference and Exhibition Incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2011, Vienna, Austria, 23–27 May 2011; Volume 5, pp. 3330–3334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wijns, C.; Perez, C.; Kowalczyk, P. Theta Map: Edge Detection in Magnetic Data. Geophysics 2005, 70, L39–L43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Dilalos, S.; Alexopoulos, J.D.; Vassilakis, E.; Poulos, S.E. Investigation of the Structural Control of a Deltaic Valley with Geophysical Methods. The Case Study of Pineios River Delta (Thessaly, Greece). J. Appl. Geophys. 2022, 202, 104652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Eldosouky, A.M.; Pham, L.T.; Mohmed, H.; Pradhan, B. A Comparative Study of THG, AS, TA, Theta, TDX and LTHG Techniques for Improving Source Boundaries Detection of Magnetic Data Using Synthetic Models: A Case Study from G. Um Monqul, North Eastern Desert, Egypt. J. Afr. Earth Sci. 2020, 170, 103940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Palencia-Ortas, A.; Ruiz-Martínez, V.C.; Villalaín, J.J.; Osete, M.L.; Vegas, R.; Touil, A.; Hafid, A.; Mcintosh, G.; van Hinsbergen, D.J.J.; Torsvik, T.H. A New 200 Ma Paleomagnetic Pole for Africa, and Paleo-Secular Variation Scatter from Central Atlantic Magmatic Province (CAMP) Intrusives in Morocco (Ighrem and Foum Zguid Dykes). Geophys. J. Int. 2011, 185, 1220–1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Bouiflane, M.; Manar, A.; Medina, F.; Youbi, N.; Rimi, A. Mapping and Characterization from Aeromagnetic Data of the Foum Zguid Dolerite Dyke (Anti-Atlas, Morocco) a Member of the Central Atlantic Magmatic Province (CAMP). Tectonophysics 2017, 708, 15–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Benaouda, R.; Holzheid, A.; Schenk, V.; Badra, L.; Ennaciri, A. Magmatic Evolution of the Jbel Boho Alkaline Complex in the Bou Azzer Inlier (Anti-Atlas/Morocco) and Its Relation to REE Mineralization. J. Afr. Earth Sci. 2017, 129, 202–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Soulaimani, A.; Jaffal, M.; Maacha, L.; Kchikach, A.; Najine, A.; Saidi, A. Magnetic Modelling of the Bou Azzer-El Graara Ophiolite (Central Anti-Atlas, Morocco). Geodynamic Implications of the Panafrican Reconstruction. Comptes Rendus-Geosci. 2006, 338, 153–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Emran, A.; Chorowicz, J. La Tectonique Polyphasée Dans La Boutonnière Précambrienne de Bou Azzer (Anti-Atlas Central, Maroc): Apports de l’imagerie Spatiale Landsat-MSS et de l’analyse Structurale de Terrain / The Panafrican Tectonic Events in the Eroded Anticline of Bou Azzer. Sci. Géologiques. Bull. 1992, 45, 121–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Soulaimani, A.; Michard, A.; Ouanaimi, H.; Baidder, L.; Raddi, Y.; Saddiqi, O.; Rjimati, E.C. Late Ediacaran-Cambrian Structures and Their Reactivation during the Variscan and Alpine Cycles in the Anti-Atlas (Morocco). J. Afr. Earth Sci. 2014, 98, 94–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Jaques, A.L.; Jaireth, S.; Walshe, J.L. Mineral Systems of Australia: An Overview of Resources, Settings and Processes. Aust. J. Earth Sci. 2002, 49, 623–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Crafford, A.E.J.; Grauch, V.J.S. Geologic and Geophysical Evidence for the Influence of Deep Crustal Structures on Paleozoic Tectonics and the Alignment of World-Class Gold Deposits, North-Central Nevada, USA. Ore Geol. Rev. 2002, 21, 157–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Tourneur, E.; Chauvet, A.; Kouzmanov, K.; Tuduri, J.; Paquez, C.; Sizaret, S.; Karfal, A.; Moundi, Y.; El Hassani, A. Co-Ni-Arsenide Mineralisation in the Bou Azzer District (Anti-Atlas, Morocco): Genetic Model and Tectonic Implications. Ore Geol. Rev. 2021, 134, 104128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Bourque, H. Le Cuivre de l’Anti-Atlas, Un Problème Complexe: Synthèse Des Occurrences Cuprifères de La Boutonnière de Bou Azzer-El Graara et Nouvelles Données (Anti-Atlas, Maroc). Ph.D. Thesis, Université d’Orléans, Orléans, France, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  57. Jaffal, M.; Soulaimani, A.; Ilmen, S.; Anzar, F.; Kchikach, A.; Manar, A.; Soulaimani, A.; Maacha, L.; Bajddi, A. Insights into the Deep Structure of the Bou Azzer-El Graara Inlier (Central Anti-Atlas, Morocco): Inference from High-Resolution Magnetic Data, and Geodynamic Implications. Tectonophysics 2023, 856, 229865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 2. (A) Residual Aeromagnetic map of Bou Azzer Inlier. (B) Aeromagnetic map of Bou Azzer Inlier Reduced to the north pole [28].
Figure 2. (A) Residual Aeromagnetic map of Bou Azzer Inlier. (B) Aeromagnetic map of Bou Azzer Inlier Reduced to the north pole [28].
Applsci 13 09962 g002
Figure 3. Calculated gradient tensor from Bou Azzer aeromagnetic datasets.
Figure 3. Calculated gradient tensor from Bou Azzer aeromagnetic datasets.
Applsci 13 09962 g003
Figure 4. Processed Horizontal invariants from calculated Gradient Tensor of Bou Azzer Inlier. (A) Lh1. (B) Lh2.
Figure 4. Processed Horizontal invariants from calculated Gradient Tensor of Bou Azzer Inlier. (A) Lh1. (B) Lh2.
Applsci 13 09962 g004
Figure 5. Theta map further strike lineaments (black lines) performed from the calculated Gradient Tensor and Invariants of Bou Azzer Inlier.
Figure 5. Theta map further strike lineaments (black lines) performed from the calculated Gradient Tensor and Invariants of Bou Azzer Inlier.
Applsci 13 09962 g005
Figure 6. Contours lines of the positive values of the RTP data overlapped on the geological map of the Bou Azzer inlier (same legend as Figure 1C).
Figure 6. Contours lines of the positive values of the RTP data overlapped on the geological map of the Bou Azzer inlier (same legend as Figure 1C).
Applsci 13 09962 g006
Figure 7. (A) Global map of Bou Azzer Lineaments obtained by Gradient tensor Analysis. (B) Rose diagram of observed faults. (C) Rose diagram of magnetic lineaments obtained by Gradient tensor Analysis and (D) Rose diagram showing the synthesis contacts in the study area.
Figure 7. (A) Global map of Bou Azzer Lineaments obtained by Gradient tensor Analysis. (B) Rose diagram of observed faults. (C) Rose diagram of magnetic lineaments obtained by Gradient tensor Analysis and (D) Rose diagram showing the synthesis contacts in the study area.
Applsci 13 09962 g007
Figure 8. (A) Stereonet diagram of Bou Azzer veins measured on the field (Schmidt stereonet, lower hemisphere). (B) Stereonet poles contour diagram of Bou Azzer veins measured orientation on the field (Schmidt stereonet, lower hemisphere).
Figure 8. (A) Stereonet diagram of Bou Azzer veins measured on the field (Schmidt stereonet, lower hemisphere). (B) Stereonet poles contour diagram of Bou Azzer veins measured orientation on the field (Schmidt stereonet, lower hemisphere).
Applsci 13 09962 g008
Figure 9. Schematic diagram describing the conjugate character of the vein system at Bou Azzer. (A) NE-SW systematic normal sinistral motion. (B) N-S normal dextral motion. Modified after [55].
Figure 9. Schematic diagram describing the conjugate character of the vein system at Bou Azzer. (A) NE-SW systematic normal sinistral motion. (B) N-S normal dextral motion. Modified after [55].
Applsci 13 09962 g009
Figure 10. Schematic 3D block of Bleïda-type mineralization modified after [56].
Figure 10. Schematic 3D block of Bleïda-type mineralization modified after [56].
Applsci 13 09962 g010
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Soulaimani, A.; Chakiri, S.; Soulaimani, S.; Bejjaji, Z.; Miftah, A.; Manar, A. Gradiometry Processing Techniques for Large-Scale of Aeromagnetic Data for Structural and Mining Implications: The Case Study of Bou Azzer Inlier, Central Anti-Atlas, Morocco. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 9962. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13179962

AMA Style

Soulaimani A, Chakiri S, Soulaimani S, Bejjaji Z, Miftah A, Manar A. Gradiometry Processing Techniques for Large-Scale of Aeromagnetic Data for Structural and Mining Implications: The Case Study of Bou Azzer Inlier, Central Anti-Atlas, Morocco. Applied Sciences. 2023; 13(17):9962. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13179962

Chicago/Turabian Style

Soulaimani, Ayoub, Saïd Chakiri, Saâd Soulaimani, Zohra Bejjaji, Abdelhalim Miftah, and Ahmed Manar. 2023. "Gradiometry Processing Techniques for Large-Scale of Aeromagnetic Data for Structural and Mining Implications: The Case Study of Bou Azzer Inlier, Central Anti-Atlas, Morocco" Applied Sciences 13, no. 17: 9962. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13179962

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop