Next Article in Journal
The Effect of Bodyweight Support and Incline Running on Triceps Surae Electromyographic Activity
Previous Article in Journal
Electroencephalographic Characterization by Covariance Analysis in Men with Parkinson’s Disease Reveals Sex- and Age-Related Differences
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Applied Sciences
Volume 13
Issue 17
10.3390/app13179619
applsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Kinetics of Ions in Post-Lithium Batteries

by
Efstratia N. Sgourou
1,
Aspassia Daskalopulu
2,
Lefteri H. Tsoukalas
3,
Ioannis L. Goulatis
2,
Ruslan V. Vovk
4 and
Alexander Chroneos
2,5,*
1
Solid State Physics Section, University of Athens, Panepistimiopolis Zografos, 15784 Athens, Greece
2
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Thessaly, 38333 Volos, Greece
3
School of Nuclear Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47906, USA
4
Department of Physics, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 4 Svobody sq., 61077 Kharkiv, Ukraine
5
Department of Materials, Imperial College London, London SW7 2BP, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(17), 9619; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13179619
Submission received: 1 August 2023 / Revised: 19 August 2023 / Accepted: 24 August 2023 / Published: 25 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Defects in Energy and Electronic Materials: From Experiment to Machine Learning)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
There is a technological necessity for more efficient, abundant, and sustainable materials for energy storage applications. Lithium-ion batteries dominate, however, there are a number of sustainability, economic, and availability issues that require the investigation of post-lithium batteries. In essence, the drive is to move to non-lithium-containing batteries as there is simply not enough lithium available to satisfy demand in a few years. To find alternative ions migrating at appropriate rates in crystal lattices requires significant research efforts and, in that respect, computational modeling can accelerate progress. The review considers recent mainly theoretical results highlighting the kinetics of ions in post-lithium oxides. It is proposed that there is a need for chemistries and ionic species that are sustainable and abundant and in that respect sodium, magnesium, and oxygen ion conduction in batteries is preferable to lithium. The limitations and promise of these systems are discussed in view of applications.

1. Introduction

The growing need for electricity generation and storage has led to a plethora of techniques seeking better energy materials to meet growing needs in technological applications that include, but are not limited to, electric vehicles, grid electricity storage, electronic products, energy harvesting, and nanoelectronics [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. Lithium compounds such as lithium carbonate (Li2CO3), lithium oxide (Li2O), and lithium hydroxide (LiOH) offer favorable electrochemical fundamentals and cost-effective manufacturing options for the fabrication of rechargeable batteries, which utilizes approximately three-quarters of the global production of lithium at present. In recent years, the explosive demand for lithium is raising questions of sustainability mostly due to rather limited known global reserves and regional concentration. Nearly half of the world’s known economically recoverable reserves of 105 million tonnes are concentrated in Bolivia, Chile, and Argentina (the so-called lithium triangle) while nearly half of the annual production of lithium is currently taking place in Australia. On the demand, side there are doubts as to whether there is enough lithium to move into electricity for the nearly 1.5 billion cars on the planet, let alone provide for grid storage and non-transportation applications. Although there seems to be sufficient lithium to enable, at least the early stages of, the green transition and Net Zero by 2050, numerous environmental, supply chain, and sustainability challenges, motivate, with a sense of urgency, scientific research and development in post-lithium energy storage technologies.
The novel materials considered for post-lithium energy storage have typically exotic crystallography and are composed of substances that are not abundant or sustainable considering the massive scale required for technological solutions to make a real difference [26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50]. Here, we consider three paradigms in energy storage applications, such as sodium (Na), divalent conductors (magnesium (Mg)), and finally oxygen (O), which have been proposed as alternatives to Li-ion conductors.
The drive to substitute Li ions is due to its high price and the limited lithium resources [43]. Sodium in comparison is more than four orders of magnitude more abundant in the Earth’s crust and also in seawater, whereas the working principle of Na-ion batteries is similar to Li-ion batteries [43]. The technological issues in Na-ion battery materials include slow insertion/extraction kinetics and low theoretical capacity and these can be traced to the larger size of the sodium ion as compared to the lithium ion. The crystal structure is the matrix where the ions migrate and the community is trying to assess which crystal structures will provide the necessary kinetics for Na ion that will compensate for its larger size as compared to Li ion.
Magnesium-based rechargeable batteries are currently being considered by the community as potential candidates for the next generation energy storage because of their high gravimetric and volumetric capacity, non-toxicity, abundance, and higher melting temperature [44,45]. Importantly, the ionic size of the Mg2+ ion is comparable to the Li+ ion, however, the stronger ionic interaction of Mg2+ ions in the lattice will make intercalation harder [44,45]. These issues can be rectified by reducing the size of the cathode ions in the crystal and by increasing the shielding of Mg2+ [33,34].
The first part of this review briefly discusses the computational methods to model oxides. In this part, molecular dynamics (MD) and density functional theory (DFT) are discussed. The second part of the review is focused on recent efforts to substitute lithium ions for energy storage applications. Sodium and magnesium-containing oxides are considered and the focus is on the ionic diffusion properties. Thereafter, we discuss oxygen ion diffusion and the novel concept of oxygen ion batteries. Then we consider ways to tune ionic diffusion as sodium and magnesium ion-containing materials are lagging behind in the kinetics as compared with lithium materials. Finally, perspectives and the future outlook are given.

2. Materials and Methods

Molecular Dynamics and Density Functional Theory

In this review, most of the results are from papers based on MD and DFT. For completeness, we will briefly summarize key aspects of these methods. For more detailed descriptions there are more comprehensive reviews on the computational modeling of inorganic materials [51,52,53].
The quantum mechanical formulation is the most complete description of nature. In practical terms, however, the analytic solution of the Schrödinger equation for a large number of electrons is computationally intensive and intractable mainly because of the complexity of many electron interactions [54]. In an effort to overcome these problems, the DFT approach was developed [55,56,57]. In the DFT approach, the exchange-correlation energy of electrons is described by the local density approximation (LDA) or the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) or with the more appropriate and rigorous hybrid functionals that include a part of exact exchange from the Hartree–Fock theory [57]. The main idea is the use of a plane-wave basis set with the pseudopotential method so that the core electrons are described by effective potentials, whereas the valence electrons can evolve explicitly. Typically, in DFT the activation energy of ionic diffusion can be predicted by identifying the minimum energy path (for example using the nudged elastic band method) [58]. Although the DFT approach is a simplification and renders the derivation of results tractable, whereas analytical approaches would not, the simulation size is still limited (typically hundreds of atoms). Therefore, the use of this approach to more extended problems (i.e., microstructures or extended defects) is not possible.
An alternative way that is popular when studying diffusion in oxides (or more extended defects such as grain boundaries) is classical potential-based MD. In classical MD the state of the system can be described by considering the positions and the momenta of all the particles with Newton’s equations of motion being solved iteratively to predict the evolution of the system. The interactions between particles are through potential energy functions and for ionic systems this is within the classical Born-like description [59]. Typically, the ionic interactions can be modeled by a Coulombic term (long-range) and by a short-range parameterized pair potential [60,61,62]. The computational simplicity of MD allows the consideration of very extended systems (millions of ions), however, they cannot describe the electronic structure of the system. Nevertheless, classical MD is a valuable tool when considering the diffusion and defect chemistry of ionic materials.
Complementary to DFT and MD are thermodynamic models that can aid in the understanding of material properties for a wide range of pressures, temperatures [63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75], and methods such as cluster expansion and special quasirandom structures that can be used to render the compositional and structural complexity of solid solutions computationally tractable [76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88]. These have become increasingly important in the past years as it is becoming common to investigate systems with ever-increasing structural complexity. In this, it is hard to randomly select one or a few “representative” structure(s) to perform the atomic scale investigation, whereas it is practically impossible to investigate all possible configurations, particularly for extended systems. In that respect, the special quasirandom structures method can offer designed smaller cells that are representative of the local structures of solid solutions. That is, it is not required to do thousands of calculations in many extended supercells, but rather a few hundred (typically) calculations in a single cell that captures all the important local environments [77,78,82,83,84,85,86,87,88]. Combining computational techniques with experiments (refer for example in [13,25] and references therein) or advanced methods such as neural networks [35] is the way forward.

3. Post-Lithium Ionic Conductors

3.1. Sodium-Ion Batteries

Sodium (Na) is being actively considered as an alternative ion for energy storage applications [44,48,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105]. In previous studies, we considered a number of sodium-based materials including NaZr2(PO4)3, Na3Fe2(PO4)3, Na3V(PO4)2, NaNiO2, NaFeO2 and Na2MnSiO4. Table 1 reports the activation energies of diffusion of promising Na of candidate Na-ion battery materials, which range from 0.26 to 0.81 eV [41,47,94,95,96,97]. It is observed from Table 1 that NaZr2(PO4)3 (known as NZP- it is NASICON-type) has a very low activation energy of diffusion (0.26 eV) [47]. These static atomistic simulations are in agreement with previous molecular dynamic calculations by Zou et al. [20] that calculated activation energy for Na diffusion of 0.23 eV.Figure 1 is a schematic representation of the long-range Na-ion diffusion and the migration energy profile for the Na pathway in NaZr2(PO4)3 [47]. DFT simulations indicate that NaZr2(PO4)3 is a wide-gap semiconductor, however, the exoergic incorporation of sodium leads to Na+ ions and electrons. Thus, it is an electronically conductive/high-capacity material that can be used as an electrode [47].
Figure 2 is a schematic representation of the crystal structure (space group C2/c) and the Na ion diffusion paths calculated in Na3Fe2(PO4)3. Here the green, purple, and light blue atoms represent the Na ion hopping trajectories [95]. Although there is no experimental work on the diffusion pathways in Na3Fe2(PO4)3 there are previous atomistic studies on related materials that show the same similar energetics and diffusion mechanisms [30,31]. For example, in the classical atomistic simulation investigation by Clark et al. [31] in Na2FeP2O7, calculated three-dimensional long-range Na ion migration paths in different directions with activation energies for Na self-diffusion 0.33–0.49 eV. Tripathi et al. [30] employed computational modeling to study Na ion diffusion in NaFePO4 material. They predicted that the lowest energy path is in the [010] direction with an activation energy of only 0.30 eV [30]. Fe-based polyanion materials have reasonably low activation energy for Na-ion diffusion and this suggests that they can be considered for energy storage applications [30,31,95].
Figure 3 represents the crystal structure (space group C2/c) and the Na ion diffusion paths along the ab-plane in monoclinic Na3V(PO4)2 [94]. For Na3V(PO4)2 previous calculations are consistent with this two-dimensional Na ion diffusion mechanism [38,94], although there is a range of the calculated activation energies (0.433 eV (DFT) [38] and 0.59 eV (static atomistic simulation) [94]).

3.2. Magnesium-Ion Batteries

Magnesium and calcium are interesting alternative ions to Li, which have the advantage of being divalent [17,45,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119]. Here we will consider Mg as a potential divalent ion to substitute Li as the diffusion of Ca ions in crystal lattices is plagued by its larger ionic radius. Table 2 reports the activation energies of Mg diffusion in candidate Mg-ion battery materials. It can be observed that there is a very wide range of activation energies (0.52–2.19 eV, refer to Table 2).
As can be observed in Table 2, MgV2O4 is the most promising Mg-ion battery material considered here with an activation energy of Mg-diffusion of 0.52 eV [45]. In more detail, Kuganathan et al. [45] employed atomistic simulations to calculate the energetics and vacancy-mechanism pathway (refer to Figure 4). The Mg local hops cover distances of 3.62 Å (refer to the arrows in Figure 4a) and the activation energy of migration is 0.52 eV (refer to Figure 4b). These local hops can lead to long-range three-dimensional (3D) diffusion. As the diffusion mechanism is 3D there is no preferred plane or direction [45]. In essence, the ionic conductivity in MgV2O4 is significant, however, when it is significantly less as compared to Li-diffusion or Na-diffusion [45,47,95].
The computational simulation studies of a range of oxides showed that Mg diffusion is significantly lower as compared to Li (or Na) diffusion, so it is anticipated that these materials in their present form will not be appropriate for energy storage applications.

4. Oxygen Ion Batteries

4.1. Oxygen-Ion Diffusion

Oxygen diffusion is a fundamental property that is very important for oxide materials employed for solid-state ionic materials, fusion materials, etc. Given the applications oxide materials with increased ionic diffusivity have been sought by the community. What is evident is that there is a wide range of oxygen diffusivities depending upon the crystallography, stoichiometry, and composition. Even in similarly structured oxides, for example, in perovskite-related oxides, there is a range of activation energies of oxygen diffusion (refer to Table 3) [120,121,122,123]. As can be observed from Table 3 of representative perovskite-related oxides, there is a significant range of activation energies of diffusion [120,121,122,123]. Although these oxides have some common structural features (the perovskite block) their differences in composition and stoichiometry lead to differences in activation energies of diffusion of 2.2 eV (refer to Table 3). Additionally, it was established in previous studies (for example [120,121,122,123] and references therein) that these materials possess different mechanisms of diffusion in different directions.

4.2. Oxygen Battery

In the seminal study by Schmid et al. [50] an oxide ion battery was constructed with a La0.6Sr0.4FeO3−δ (LSF) cathode and a La0.5Sr0.5Cr0.2Mn0.8O3−δ (LSCrMn) anode. Figure 5 shows schematically how the oxygen ion batteries compare with respect to other related electrochemical technologies with respect to their potential power and energy density [50]. The cycling performance was excellent, whereas DC measurements determined capacities up to 120 of A h cm−3 at a cell voltage of 0.6 V and a temperature of 350–400 °C [50]. The study of Schmid et al. [50] showed that mixed ionic electronic conducting-based oxide ion batteries are a possible electrochemical energy storage solution. In a subsequent study, Krammer et al. [124] prepared porous La0.6Sr0.4CoO3−δ (LSC) thin film electrodes on yttria-stabilized zirconia. They determined that rechargeable oxygen ion batteries efficiently store oxygen by changing the oxygen non-stoichiometry and by the encapsulation of high-pressure oxygen in the closed pores of the cathode [124].
The high operating temperatures required (typically 200–500 °C) exclude this technology from mobile applications where Li-ion batteries dominate (such as laptops, phones, and cars). Nevertheless, it is a promising technology to store energy where there can be a supply of heat and off-peak electricity production, for example near a civil nuclear reactor. Such an energy storage solution with provide added benefit for the use of centralized nuclear energy production.

5. Tuning the Ionic Diffusion

Tuning the ionic diffusion is typically carried out by doping as discussed above and by forming interfaces or using external parameters such as strain; also, interfaces are important for energy applications [6,7,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137]. As the energetics of ionic diffusion are governed by the activation energy of diffusion that is in turn the sum of the migration energy of diffusion (i.e., the energy barrier that the ion has to overcome) and the formation energy (i.e., the number of mobile species, so for an oxygen ion migrating via a vacancy mechanism the formation energy of the oxygen vacancy is important) it is necessary for faster diffusion to lower these terms. For example, Kushima and Yildiz [9] employed DFT calculations to predict the optimum strain conditions that would lower the oxygen ion migration energy barriers in strained yttria-stabilized zirconia. Considering the study by Lee et al. [135] it was determined that designed ionic interfaces (heterointerface between CeO2 (fluorite) and Y2O3 (bixbyite)) can lead to the formation of a very high concentration of interfacial oxygen vacancies. These fluorite-bixbyite interfaces pave the way for the designed formation, transport, and control of oxygen vacancies and may have applications in memristive and ionotronic devices [135]. Notably, the field benefited from the study of Garcia-Barriocanal et al. [6] which determined a colossal enhancement in the ionic conductivity at ZrO2:Y2O3/SrTiO3 heterostructures. Although there was a lot of research on the claims by Garcia-Barriocanal et al. [6,7,9,127] there was significant focus and progress in the field in the direction of heterointerfaces. As it was seen in Section 3, Mg and Na ions would benefit from an enhancement in the diffusion energetics. What the energy storage community normally investigates first is the impact of the structure and composition (i.e., crystal structure and hypo-hyperstoichiometry) and doping). Future work should also explore the impact of designed heterointerfaces on the diffusion of Mg and Na ions. The key could well be designing the material interfaces rather than exploring exotic crystallographies and compositions. Designed interfaces could offer the concentration of the vehicles required for ionic transport and lower the migration energy barriers.
Doping is an efficient way to tune the migration energy barrier, the number of intrinsic defects required for diffusion, and electronic properties. Considering Na3Fe2(PO4)3 the lowest energy intrinsic defect process is the Na Frenkel (i.e., the formation of a Na vacancy and Na interstitial pair) [95]. This, in turn, will lead to the formation of Na vacancies that are beneficial for Na ion migration as the vacancy mechanism is energetically favorable [95]. Doping the Fe of the site of Na3Fe2(PO4)3 with isovalent dopants (M = Sc, La, Gd, and Y) to form Na3(FexM1−x)2(PO4)3 can improve electronic conductivity [95]. Importantly, for Zr doping on the Fe site increases the Na vacancy concentration [95]. Conversely, doping with Si on the P site results in the formation of Na interstitials, which can lead to the enhancement of the capacity of Na3Fe2(PO4)3. For NaZr2(PO4)3 the Na Frenkel is also the lowest energy intrinsic defect process [47]. Considering isovalent doping it was predicted that K+ and Ge4+ are the significant isovalent dopants on the Na and Zr sites [47]. Doping with Yb, Y, Ga, and In on the Zr site leads to the formation of oxygen vacancies and Na interstitials [47]. Finally, for Na3V(PO4)2 atomistic simulations revealed that the Na-V anti-site defect is the lowest energy intrinsic defect process [94]. Therefore, at high temperatures, there will be some Na ions on the V site and V ions on the Na site [94]. The high energy of the Na Frenkel mechanism will result in very few Na vacancies that are necessary for Na+ diffusion. The most efficient strategy to form these Na vacancies is by doping with the tetravalent dopant Ge4+ on the V site [94]. Notably, Ge doping on the P site increases the Na interstitial concentration that is required for high capacity [94]. Considering MgV2O4, Kuganathan et al. [45] showed that doping with cobalt at the vanadium site can lead to the increase of Mg interstitials and O vacancies.
In the fundamental study by Chiabrera et al. [19] it was determined that the control (tuning) of the non-stoichiometry in grain boundaries is an efficient way to enhance the diffusion properties. In particular, Chiabrera et al. [19] showed that the defects induced by strain in the La1-xSrxMnO3±δ (LSM) grain boundaries amplify the oxygen diffusion. In essence, with the use of designed interfaces and/or the formation of nanocomposites with appropriate architectures it is possible to tune the material properties of systems for energy applications without the need to use very expensive and scarce materials such as Li or rare-earths.
The kinetics of Na ions (and to a lesser degree Mg) and the continuous and systematic investigation of new novel oxides for energy storage applications are very promising and are expected to compete with Li [138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148]. These ions also have considerable advantages as compared to Li. In particular, Na and Mg are far more abundant, more environmentally friendly, sustainable, and economical as compared to Li. Therefore, should the engineering requirements are met they will make a significant contribution to energy storage from renewable energy and nuclear energy production sites.

6. Summary, Perspective, and Future Outlook

Motivated by explosive lithium demand (for transportation and grid energy storage) and known supply limitations including reserves, regional concentration, mining, and supply chain as well as environmental concerns, the present review considers alternatives to lithium compounds with emphasis on the computational modeling of prospective alternative materials for energy storage. Particular focus is on the defect processes and kinetics of post-lithium oxide batteries. Computational modeling is a tool that can be utilized to provide supplementary information to experiment in order to understand defective oxide materials and optimize them for energy storage applications. Its advantages include aiding experimental work in the characterization of crystal structures, the prediction of the defect diffusion mechanism and energetics, the discovery of the most efficient defect engineering strategies to optimize diffusion, and the fundamental understanding of interfaces and their properties. It is acknowledged that the most interesting systems are usually the ones with the most complicated structures, composition, and stoichiometry. All these constitute their experimental investigation and synthesis difficult. Theoretical calculations can offer a complementary tool to select and focus on the most important systems and there has been also substantial progress in the past years in advanced methodologies. These are now applicable given the ever-increasing computational power and it is anticipated that quantum MD simulations will become a popular tool to investigate the structure, diffusion energetics, and electronic properties of extended systems. Hybrid functionals and meta-GGA approaches are also presently used and these in turn are important when considering the electronic structure of defects. At any rate, deeper analysis will be gained by the traditional methods of analysis such as Brouwer diagrams and the thermodynamic cBΩ model. These approaches have been embraced, to some extent, by the community in energy-related materials studies. Finally, it is anticipated that advanced techniques based on machine learning will gain ground particularly when a particular material or family of materials will need to be pre-selected for experimental or advanced DFT work. This in turn will accelerate the research and development processes.
A bottleneck for technology is the use of expensive and scarce materials (such as Li, rare-earths, or precious metals) in most advanced technological applications. This is an expensive and unsustainable way that will lead to delay and frustration in the coming years. Many key materials such as rare-earths are mined in China, whereas economic areas such as the EU produce very limited quantities of rare-earths and Li. A future potential reduction in rare-earth or Li exports will have disastrous consequences for numerous industries in many countries. Recycling and/or the discovery of more mines alone will not suffice to provide a sustainable supply of these materials. What is required is to gradually reduce the dependence on scarce materials in advanced technological applications and to move towards cheaper and more available materials. In this respect, the development of energy storage materials based on Na, and to a lesser degree Mg, is the way forward. The development of energy storage systems needs to be assessed considering all steps from cradle to grave. The environmental, economic, and sustainability of storage systems are also important for associated technologies such as renewable energy production and nuclear energy.

Author Contributions

The manuscript was written and edited by all authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Steele, B.C.H. Appraisal of Ce1-yGdyO2-y/2 electrolytes for IT-SOFC operation at 500 °C. Solid State Ion. 2000, 129, 95–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sata, N.; Eberman, K.; Eberl, K.; Maier, J. Mesoscopic fast ion conduction in nanometre scale planar heterostructures. Nature 2000, 408, 946–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Singhal, S.C. Advances in solid oxide fuel cell technology. Solid State Ion. 2000, 135, 305–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sickafus, K.E.; Minervini, L.; Grimes, R.W.; Valdez, J.A.; Ishimaru, M.; Li, F.; McClellan, K.J.; Hartmann, T. Radiation tolerance of complex oxides. Science 2000, 289, 748–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Steele, B.C.H.; Heinzel, A. Materials for fuel-cell technologies. Nature 2001, 414, 345–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Garcia-Barriocanal, J.; Rivera-Calzada, A.; Varela, M.; Sefrioui, Z.; Iborra, E.; Leon, C.; Pennycook, S.J.; Santamaria, J. Colossal ionic conductivity at interfaces of epitaxial ZrO2:Y2O3/SrTiO3 heterostructures. Science 2008, 321, 676–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kilner, J.A. Ionic conductors: Feel the strain. Nat. Mater. 2008, 7, 838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Vovk, R.V.; Obolenskii, M.A.; Zavgorodniy, A.A.; Goulatis, I.L.; Beleskii, V.I.; Chroneos, A. Structural relaxation, metal to insulator transition and pseudo-gap in oxygen deficient HoBa2Cu3O7-δ single crystals. Phys. C 2009, 469, 203–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Vovk, R.V.; Vovk, N.R.; Shekhovtsov, O.V.; Goulatis, I.L.; Chroneos, A. c-axis hopping conductivity in heavily Pr-doped YBCO single crystals. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 2013, 26, 085017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rushton, M.J.D.; Chroneos, A.; Skinner, S.J.; Kilner, J.A.; Grimes, R.W. Effect of strain on the oxygen diffusion in yttria and gadolinia co-doped ceria. Solid State Ion. 2013, 230, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rushton, M.J.D.; Chroneos, A. Impact of uniaxial strain and doping on oxygen diffusion in CeO2. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 6068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lumley, S.C.; Grimes, R.W.; Murphy, S.T.; Burr, P.A.; Chroneos, A.; Chard-Tuckey, P.R.; Wenman, M.R. The thermodynamics of hydride precipitation: The importance of entropy, enthalpy and disorder. Acta Mater. 2014, 79, 351–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tomkiewicz, A.C.; Tamimi, A.; Huq, A.; McIntosh, S. Oxygen transport pathways in Ruddlesden–Popper structured oxides revealed via in situ neutron diffraction. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 21864–21874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ning, D.; Baki, A.; Scherb, T.; Song, J.; Fantin, A.; Liu, X.Z.; Schumacher, G.; Banhart, J.; Bouwmeester, H.J.M. Influence of A-site deficiency on structural evolution of Pr2−xNiO4+δ with temperature. Solid State Ion. 2019, 342, 115056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Solovjov, A.L.; Petrenko, E.V.; Omelchenko, L.V.; Vovk, R.V.; Goulatis, I.L.; Chroneos, A. Effect of annealing on a pseudogap state in untwinned YBa2Cu3O7-δ single crystals. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 9274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kuganathan, N.; Iyngaran, P.; Vovk, R.; Chroneos, A. Defects, dopants and Mg diffusion in MgTiO3. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 4394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chiabrera, F.; Garbayo, I.; Lopez-Conesa, L.; Martin, G.; Ruiz-Caridad, A.; Walls, M.; Ruiz-Gonzalez, L.; Kordatos, A.; Nunez, M.; Morata, A.; et al. Engineering transport in manganites by tuning local nonstoichiometry in grain boundaries. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1805360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Acosta, M.; Baiutti, F.; Tarancon, A.; MacManus-Driscoll, J.L. Nanostructured materials and interfaces for advanced ionic electronic conducting oxides. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 6, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zou, Z.; Ma, N.; Wang, A.; Ran, Y.; Song, T.; Jiao, Y.; Liu, J.; Zhou, H.; Shi, W.; He, B.; et al. Relationships between Na+ distribution, concerted migration, and diffusion properties in rhombohedral NASICON. Adv. Energy Mater. 2020, 10, 2001486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Shi, J.; Han, C.; Niu, H.; Zhu, Y.; Yun, S. Theoretical investigation of proton diffusion in Dion-Jacobson layered perovskite RbBiNb2O7. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, F.; Xing, Y.; Hu, E.; Wang, J.; Shi, J.; Yun, S.; Zhu, B. PN heterostructure interface-facilitated proton conduction in 3C-SiC/Na0.6CoO2 electrolyte for fuel cell application. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2021, 4, 7519–7525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Grieshammer, S.; Belova, I.V.; Murch, G.E. Thermodiffusion and ion transport in doped ceria by molecular dynamics simulations. Acta Mater. 2021, 210, 116802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Varley, J.B.; Shen, B.; Higashiwaki, M. Wide bandgap semiconductor materials and devices. J. Appl. Phys. 2022, 131, 230401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hassan, J.Z.; Raza, A.; Qumar, U.; Li, G. Recent advances in engineering strategies of Bi-based photocatalysts for environmental remediation. Sust. Mater. Technol. 2022, 33, e00478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yatoo, M.A.; Seymour, I.D.; Skinner, S.J. Neutron diffraction and DFT studies of oxygen defect and transport in higher-order Ruddlesden–Popper phase materials. RSC Adv. 2023, 13, 13786–13797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Feng, Z.; Yang, J.; NuLi, Y.; Wang, J. Sol–gel synthesis of Mg1.03Mn0.97SiO4 and its electrochemical intercalation behavior. J. Power Sources 2008, 184, 604–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Schichtel, N.; Korte, C.; Hesse, D.; Janek, J. Elastic strain at interfaces and its influence on ionic conductivity in nanoscaled solid electrolyte thin films- theoretical considerations and experimental studies. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2009, 11, 3043–3048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Vovk, R.V.; Nazyrov, Z.F.; Obolenskii, M.A.; Goulatis, I.L.; Chroneos, A.; Simoes, V.M.P. Phase separation in oxygen deficient HoBa2Cu3O7-δ single crystals: Effect of pressure and twin boundaries. Phil. Mag. 2011, 91, 2291–2302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Serras, P.; Palomares, V.; Goñi, A.; Gil de Muro, I.; Kubiak, P.; Lezama, L.; Rojo, T. High voltage cathode materials for Na-ion batteries of general formula Na3V2O2x(PO4)2F3-2x. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 22301–22308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tripathi, R.; Wood, S.M.; Islam, M.S.; Nazar, L.F. Na-ion mobility in layered Na2FePO4F and olivine Na[Fe,Mn]PO4. Energy Environ. Sci. 2013, 6, 2257–2264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Clark, J.M.; Barpanda, P.; Yamada, A.; Islam, M.S. Sodium-ion battery cathodes Na2FeP2O7 and Na2MnP2O7: Diffusion behavior for high rate performance. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 11807–11812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Orikasa, Y.; Masese, T.; Koyama, Y.; Mori, T.; Hattori, M.; Yamamoto, K.; Okado, T.; Huang, Z.D.; Minato, T.; Tassel, C.; et al. High energy density rechargeable magnesium battery using earth-abundant and non-toxic elements. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 5622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Lee, S.H.; DiLeo, R.A.; Marschilok, A.C.; Takeuchi, K.J.; Takeuchi, E.S. Sol gel based synthesis and electrochemistry of magnesium vanadium oxide: A promising cathode material for secondary magnesium ion batteries. ECS Electrochem. Lett. 2014, 3, A87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Huang, Z.D.; Masese, T.; Orikasa, Y.; Mori, T.; Minato, T.; Tassel, C.; Kobayashi, Y.; Kageyama, H.; Uchimoto, Y. MgFePO4F as a feasible cathode material for magnesium batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 11578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jay, E.E.; Rushton, M.J.D.; Chroneos, A.; Grimes, R.W.; Kilner, J.A. Genetics of superionic conductivity in lithium lanthanum titanates. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 178–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Yun, S.; Zhou, X.; Even, J.; Hagfeldt, A. Theoretical treatment of CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite solar cells. Angew. Chem. 2017, 56, 15806–15817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhu, J.; Vasilopoulou, M.; Davazoglou, D.; Kennou, S.; Chroneos, A.; Schwingenschlögl, U. Intrinsic defects and H doping in WO3. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 40882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kim, J.; Yoon, G.; Kim, H.; Park, Y.U.; Kang, K. Na3V(PO4)2: A new layered-type cathode material with high water stability and power capability for Na-ion batteries. Chem. Mater. 2018, 30, 3683–3689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kuganathan, N.; Kordatos, A.; Fitzpatrick, M.E.; Vovk, R.V.; Chroneos, A. Defect process and lithium diffusion in Li2TiO3. Solid State Ion. 2018, 327, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kuganathan, N.; Kordatos, A.; Chroneos, A. Li2SnO3 as a cathode material for lithium-ion batteries: Defects, lithium ion diffusion and dopants. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 12621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kuganathan, N.; Chroneos, A. Defects, dopants and sodium mobility in Na2MnSiO4. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 14669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Kuganathan, N.; Chroneos, A. Defects and dopant properties of Li3V2(PO4)3. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 333. [Google Scholar]
  43. Liu, T.; Zhang, Y.; Jiang, Z.; Zeng, X.; Ji, J.; Li, Z.; Gao, X.; Sun, M.; Lin, Z.; Ling, M.; et al. Exploring competitive features of stationary sodium ion batteries for electrochemical energy storage. Energy Environ. Sci. 2019, 12, 1512–1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Tsuruaka, T.; Tsujita, T.; Su, J.; Nishitani, Y.; Hamamura, T.; Inatomi, Y.; Nakura, K.; Terabe, K. Fabrication of a magnesium-ion conducting magnesium phosphate electrolyte film using atomic layer deposition. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2020, 59, SIIG08. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kuganathan, N.; Davazoglou, K.; Chroneos, A. Computer modelling investigation of MgV2O4 for Mg-ion batteries. J. Appl. Phys. 2020, 127, 035106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kuganathan, N.; Rushton, M.J.D.; Grimes, R.W.; Kilner, J.A.; Gkanas, E.I.; Chroneos, A. Self-diffusion in garnet-type Li7La3Zr2O12 solid electrolytes. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kuganathan, N.; Chroneos, A. Defects, diffusion, dopants and encapsulation of Na in NaZr2(PO4)3. Materialia 2021, 16, 101039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hasa, I.; Mariyappan, S.; Saurel, D.; Adelhelm, P.; Koposov, A.Y.; Masquelier, C.; Croguennec, L.; Casas-Cabanas, M. Challenges of today for Na-based batteries of the future: From materials to cell metrics. J. Power Sources 2021, 482, 228872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Rex, K.A.; Iyngaran, P.; Kuganathan, N.; Chroneos, A. Defect properties and lithium incorporation in Li2ZrO3. Energies 2021, 14, 3963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Schmid, A.; Krammer, M.; Fleig, J. Rechargeable oxide ion batteries based on mixed conducting oxide electrodes. Adv. Energy Mater. 2023, 13, 2203789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Smith, W.; Forester, T.R. DL_POLY_2.0: A general-purpose parallel molecular dynamics simulation package. J. Mol. Graph. 1996, 14, 136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Gale, J.D. GULP: A computer program for the symmetry-adapted simulation of solids. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1997, 93, 629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Catlow, C.R.A. (Ed.) Computer Modelling in Inorganic Crystallography, 1st ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  54. Segall, M.D.; Lindan, P.J.D.; Probert, M.J.; Pickard, C.J.; Hasnip, P.J.; Clark, S.J.; Payne, M.C. First-principles simulation: Ideas, illustrations and the CASTEP code. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2002, 14, 2717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Hohenberg, P.; Kohn, W. Inhomogeneous electron gas. Phys. Rev. 1964, 136, B864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kohn, W. Nobel Lecture: Electronic structure of matter—Wave functions and density functionals. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1998, 71, 1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Koch, W.; Holthausen, M.C. A Chemist’s Guide to Density Functional Theory; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  58. Henkelman, G.; Uberuaga, B.P.; Jónsson, H. A climbing image nudged elastic band method for finding saddle points and minimum energy paths. J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 113, 9901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Born, M.; Mayer, J.E. Zur Gittertheorie der Ionenkristalle. Z. Phys. 1932, 75, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Buckingham, R.A. The classical equation of state of gaseous helium, neon and argon. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 1938, 168, 264. [Google Scholar]
  61. Grimes, R.W.; Busker, G.; McCoy, M.A.; Chroneos, A.; Kilner, J.A.; Chen, S.P. The effect of ion size on solution mechanism and defect cluster geometry. Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 1997, 101, 1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Busker, G.; Chroneos, A.; Grimes, R.W.; Chen, I.W. Solution Mechanisms for Dopant Oxides in Yttria. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1999, 82, 1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Varotsos, P. Calculation of the migration volume of vacancies in ionic solids from macroscopic parameters. Phys. Stat. Sol. 1978, 47, K133–K136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Varotsos, P. Comparison of models that interconnect point defect parameters in solids with bulk properties. J. Appl. Phys. 2007, 101, 123503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Varotsos, P. Point defect parameters in β-PbF2 revisited. Solid State Ion. 2008, 179, 438–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Zhang, B.; Wu, X.; Xu, J.; Zhou, R. Application of the cBΩ model for the calculation of oxygen self-diffusion coefficients in minerals. J. Appl. Phys. 2010, 108, 053505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Vallianatos, F.; Saltas, V. Application of the cBΩ model to the calculation of diffusion parameters of He in olivine. Phys. Chem. Miner. 2014, 41, 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Cooper, M.W.D.; Grimes, R.W.; Fitzpatrick, M.E.; Chroneos, A. Modeling oxygen self-diffusion in UO2 under pressure. Solid State Ion. 2015, 282, 26–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zhang, B.; Shan, S. Application of the cBΩ model to the calculation of diffusion parameters of Si in silicates. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 2015, 16, 705–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Chroneos, A.; Vovk, R.V. Modeling self-diffusion in UO2 and ThO2 by connecting point defect parameters with bulk properties. Solid State Ion. 2015, 274, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Parfitt, D.C.; Cooper, M.W.D.; Rushton, M.J.D.; Christopoulos, S.-R.G.; Fitzpatrick, M.E.; Chroneos, A. Thermodynamic calculations of oxygen self-diffusion in mixed-oxide nuclear fuels. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 74018–74028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Saltas, V.; Chroneos, A.; Vallianatos, F.A. A thermodynamic approach of self- and hetero-diffusion in GaAs: Connecting point defect parameters with bulk properties. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 53324–53330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Chroneos, A. Connecting point defect parameters with bulk properties to describe diffusion in solids. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2016, 3, 041304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Sarlis, N.V.; Skordas, E.S. Estimating the compressibility of osmium from recent measurements of Ir-Os alloys under high pressure. J. Phys. Chem. A 2016, 120, 1601–1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Skordas, E.S.; Sarlis, N.V.; Varotsos, P.A. Applying the cBΩ thermodynamical model to LiF using its equation of state obtained from high pressure diamond anvil cell measurements. Solid State Ion. 2020, 354, 115404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Sanchez, J.M.; Ducastelle, F.; Gratias, D. Generalized cluster description of multicomponent systems. Phys. A 1984, 128, 334–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Wei, S.H.; Ferreira, L.G.; Bernard, J.E.; Zunger, A. Electronic properties of random alloys: Special quasirandom structures. Phys. Rev. B 1990, 42, 9622–9649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Zunger, A.; Wei, S.H.; Ferreira, L.G.; Bernard, J.E. Special quasirandom structures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1990, 65, 353–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Laks, D.B.; Ferreira, L.G.; Froyen, S.; Zunger, A. Efficient cluster expansion for substitutional systems. Phys. Rev. B 1992, 46, 12587–12605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Wolverton, C.; Zunger, A. Ising-like description of structurally released ordered and disordered alloys. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1995, 75, 3162–3165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Jiang, C.; Sordelet, D.J.; Gleeson, B. First-principles study of phase stability in pseudobinary (Ni1-xPtx)3Al. Phys. Rev. B 2005, 72, 184203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Chroneos, A.; Jiang, C.; Grimes, R.W.; Schwingenschlögl, U.; Bracht, H. Defect interactions in Sn1-xGex alloys. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 94, 252104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Chroneos, A.; Jiang, C.; Grimes, R.W.; Schwingenschlögl, U.; Bracht, H. E centers in Si1-x-yGexSny alloys. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 95, 112101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Murphy, S.T.; Chroneos, A.; Jiang, C.; Schwingenschlögl, U.; Grimes, R.W. Deviations from Vegard’s law in ternary III-V alloys. Phys. Rev. B 2010, 82, 073201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Murphy, S.T.; Chroneos, A.; Grimes, R.W.; Jiang, C.; Schwingenschlögl, U. Phase stability and the arsenic vacancy defect in InxGa1-xAs. Phys. Rev. B 2011, 84, 184108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Wang, H.; Chroneos, A.; Jiang, C.; Schwingenschlögl, U. Modelling zirconium hydrides using the special quasirandom structure approach. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013, 15, 7599–7603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Chroneos, A.; Rushton, M.J.D.; Jiang, C.; Tsoukalas, L.H. Nuclear wasteform materials: Atomistic simulation case studies. J. Nucl. Mater. 2013, 441, 29–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Jiang, C.; Chroneos, A. Ab initio modelling of MAX phase solid solutions using the special quasirandom structure approach. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2018, 20, 1173–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Chen, C.Y.; Matsumoto, K.; Nohira, T.; Hagiwara, R. Na2MnSiO4 as a positive electrode material for sodium secondary batteries using an ionic liquid electrolyte. Electrochem. Commun. 2014, 45, 63–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Kosova, N.V.; Podugolnikov, V.R.; Devyatkina, E.T.; Slobodyuk, A.B. Structure and electrochemistry of NaFePO4 and Na2FePO4F cathode materials prepared via mechanochemical route. Mater. Res. Bull. 2014, 60, 849–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Han, M.H.; Gonzalo, E.; Singh, G.; Rojo, T. A comprehensive review of sodium layered oxides: Powerful cathodes for Na-ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 2015, 8, 81–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Fang, Y.; Liu, Q.; Xiao, L.; Ai, X.; Yang, H.; Cao, Y. High-Performance Olivine NaFePO4 Microsphere Cathode Synthesized by Aqueous Electrochemical Displacement Method for Sodium Ion Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 17977–17984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Hang, X.; Rui, X.; Chen, D.; Tan, H.; Yang, D.; Huang, S.; Yu, Y. Na3V2(PO4)3: An advanced cathode for sodium-ion batteries. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 2556–2576. [Google Scholar]
  94. Kuganathan, N.; Chroneos, A. Na3V(PO4)2 cathode material for Na ion batteries: Defect, dopants and Na diffusion. Solid State Ion. 2019, 336, 75–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Kuganathan, N.; Chroneos, A. Defect chemistry and Na-ion diffusion in Na3Fe2(PO4)3. Materials 2019, 12, 1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Kaushalya, R.; Iyngaran, P.; Kuganathan, N.; Chroneos, A. Defect, diffusion and dopant properties of NaNiO2: Atomistic simulation study. Energies 2019, 12, 3094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Kuganathan, N.; Kelaidis, N.; Chroneos, A. Defect chemistry, sodium diffusion and doping behaviour in NaFeO2. Materials 2019, 12, 3243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Pak, Y.C.; Rim, C.H.; Hwang, S.G.; Ri, K.C.; Yu, C.J. Defect formation and ambivalent effects on electrochemical performance in layered sodium titanate Na2Ti3O7. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2023, 25, 3420–3431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Apostolova, I.N.; Apostolov, A.T.; Wesselinowa, J.M. Band gap energy of ion-doped multiferroic NaFeO2 nanoparticles. Phys. Status Solidi RRL 2023, 2300159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Wu, H.L.; Chen, Y.Q.; Wen, T.Z.; Chen, L.; Pu, X.J.; Chen, Z.X. Advances in vanadium-redoxed polyanions for high-voltage sodium-ion batteries. Batteries 2023, 9, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Paidi, A.K.; Sharma, A.; Paidi, V.K.; Illa, M.P.; Lee, K.S.; Lee, S.S.; Ahn, D.; Mukhopadhyay, A. Na2ZrFe(PO4)3- A Rhombohedral NASICON-Structured Material: Synthesis, Structure and Na-Intercalation Behavior. Inorg. Chem. 2023, 62, 4124–4135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Ji, Y.Z.; Honma, T.; Komatsu, T. Formation of sodium ion conductive NaZr2(PO4)3 composite via liquid phase sintering method with sodium disilicate glass. Solid State Ion. 2023, 395, 116213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Satrughna, J.A.K.; Kanwade, A.; Srivastava, A.; Tiwara, M.K.; Yadav, S.C.; Akula, S.T.; Shirage, P.M. Experimental and ab initio based DFT calculation of NaFe0.5Co0.5O2 as an excellent cathode material for futuristic sodium ion batteries. J. Energy Storage 2023, 65, 107371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Gomez-Garduno, N.; Araiza, D.G.; Celaya, C.A.; Muniz, J.; Pfeiffer, H. Unveiling the different physicochemical properties of M-doped beta-NaFeO2 (where M = Ni or Cu) materials evaluated as CO2 sorbents: A combined experimental and theoretical analysis. J. Mater. Chem. A 2023, 11, 10938–10954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Zhang, X.T.; Tian, H.L.; Zhang, Y.H.; Cai, Y.J.; Yao, X.; Su, Z. Diatomic-doped carbon layer decorated Na3V2(PO4)2F3 as a durable ultrahigh-stability cathode for sodium ion batteries. New J. Chem. 2023, 47, 9611–9617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Aurbach, D.; Gofer, Y.; Lu, Z.; Schechter, A.; Chusid, O.; Gizbar, H.; Cohen, Y.; Ashkenazi, V.; Moshkovich, M.; Turgeman, R.; et al. A short review on the comparison between Li battery systems and rechargeable magnesium battery technology. J. Power Sources 2001, 97–98, 28–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Muldoon, J.; Bucur, C.B.; Gregory, T. Quest for Nonaqueous Multivalent Secondary Batteries: Magnesium and Beyond. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 11683–11720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Ponrouch, A.; Frontera, C.; Bardé, F.; Palacín, M.R. Towards a calcium-based rechargeable battery. Nat. Mater. 2015, 15, 169–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Gummow, R.J.; Vamvounis, G.; Kannan, M.B.; He, Y. Calcium-Ion Batteries: Current State-of-the-Art and Future Perspectives. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1801702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Kuganathan, N.; Gkanas, E.I.; Chroneos, A. Mg6MnO8 as a magnesium-ion battery material: Defects, dopants and Mg-ion transport. Energies 2019, 12, 3213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Kuganathan, N.; Ganeshalingam, S.; Chroneos, A. Defect, transport, and dopant properties of andradite garnet Ca3Fe2Si3O12. AIP Adv. 2020, 10, 075004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Kuganathan, N.; Chroneos, A. Defect and dopants in CaFeSi2O6: Classical and DFT simulations. Energies 2020, 13, 1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Kuganathan, N.; Chroneos, A. Atomic-scale studies of garnet-type Mg3Fe2Si3O12: Defect chemistry, diffusion and dopant properties. J. Power Sources Adv. 2020, 3, 100016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Kuganathan, N.; Chroneos, A. Defect and dopant properties in CaMnO3. AIP Adv. 2021, 11, 055106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Torres, A.; Casals, J.L.; Arroyo de Dompablo, M.E. Enlisting potential cathode materials for rechargeable Ca batteries. Chem. Mater. 2021, 33, 2488–2497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Tekliye, D.B.; Kumar, A.; Weihang, X.; Mercy, T.D.; Canepa, P.; Gautam, G.S. Exploration of NASICON frameworks as calcium-ion battery electrodes. Chem. Mater. 2022, 34, 10133–10143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Liu, D.W.; Chen, X.H.; Zhang, Q.J.; Li, J.C.; Yan, F.F.; Dai, H.Y.; Wang, X.Z.; Chen, J.; Zhai, X.Z. Effects of Mg-doping on distorted structure and enhanced electrochemical performance of V1-xMgxO2 nanorods. Mater. Today Energy 2022, 33, 104948. [Google Scholar]
  118. Zhang, X.; Li, D.; Ruan, Q.; Liu, L.; Wang, B.; Xiong, F.; Huang, C.; Chu, P. Vanadium-based cathode materials for rechargeable magnesium batteries. Mater. Today Energy 2023, 32, 101232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Lagunas, F.; Alexander, G.; Punaro, A.L.; Moscosa, C.; Hu, L.H.; Cabana, J.; Klie, R.F. Structural transformations at the atomic scale in spinel vanadium oxides upon Mg2+ extraction. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2023, 6, 5681–5689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Mauvy, F.; Bassat, J.M.; Boehm, E.; Dordor, P.; Grenier, J.C.; Loup, J.P. Chemical oxygen diffusion coefficient measurement by conductivity relaxation—Correlation between tracer diffusion coefficient and chemical diffusion coefficient. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2004, 24, 1265–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Boehm, E.; Bassat, J.M.; Dordor, P.; Mauvy, F.; Grenier, J.C.; Stevens, P. Oxygen diffusion and transport properties in non-stoichiometric Ln2−xNiO4+δ oxides. Solid State Ion. 2005, 176, 2717–2725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Tarancon, A.; Marrero-Lopez, D.; Pena-Martinez, J.; Ruiz-Morales, J.C.; Nunez, P. Effect of phase transition on high-temperature electrical properties of GdBaCo2O5+x layered perovskite. Solid State Ion. 2008, 179, 611–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Rupasov, D.; Chroneos, A.; Parfitt, D.; Kilner, J.A.; Grimes, R.W.; Istomin, S.Y.; Antipov, E.V. Oxygen diffusion in Sr0.75Y0.25CoO2.625: A molecular dynamics study. Phys. Rev. 2009, 79, 172102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Krammer, M.; Schmid, A.; Kubicek, M.; Feig, J. Utilizing oxygen gas storage in rechargeable oxygen ion batteries. J. Power Sources 2023, 577, 233167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Korte, C.; Schichtel, N.; Hesse, D.; Janek, J. Influence of interface structure on mass transport in phase boundaries between different ionic materials: Experimental studies and formal considerations. Monatsh. Chem. 2009, 140, 1069–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Cavallaro, A.; Burriel, M.; Roqueta, J.; Apostolidis, A.; Bernardi, A.; Tarancόn, A.; Srinivasan, R.; Cook, S.N.; Fraser, H.L.; Kilner, J.A.; et al. Electronic nature of the enhanced conductivity in YSZ-STO multilayers deposited by PLD. Solid State Ion. 2010, 181, 592–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Pennycook, T.J.; Beck, M.J.; Varga, K.; Varela, M.; Pennycook, S.J.; Pantelides, S.T. Origin of colossal ionic conductivity in oxide multilayers: Interface induced sublattice disorder. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 104, 115901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. De Souza, R.A.; Ramadan, A.; Hörner, S. Modifying the barriers for oxygen-vacancy migration in fluorite-structured CeO2 electrolytes through strain; A computer simulation study. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 5445–5453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Navickas, E.; Huber, T.M.; Chen, Y.; Hetaba, W.; Holzlechner, G.; Rupp, G.; Stöger-Pollach, M.; Friedbacher, G.; Hutter, H.; Yildiz, B.; et al. Fast oxygen exchange and diffusion kinetics of grain boundaries in Sr-doped LaMnO3 thin films. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 7659–7669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Saranya, A.M.; Pla, D.; Morata, A.; Cavallaro, A.; Canales-Vazquez, J.; Kilner, J.A.; Burriel, M.; Tarancon, A. Engineering mixed ionic electronic conduction in La0.8Sr0.2MnO3+δ nanostructures through fast grain boundary oxygen diffusivity. Adv. Energy Mater. 2015, 5, 1500377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Sun, L.; Marrocchelli, D.; Yildiz, B. Edge dislocation slows down oxide ion diffusion in doped CeO2 by segregation of charged defects. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Ma, W.; Kim, J.J.; Tsvetkov, N.; Daio, T.; Kuru, Y.; Cai, Z.; Chen, Y.; Sasaki, K.; Tuller, H.L.; Yildiz, B. Vertically aligned nanocomposite La0.8Sr0.2CoO3/(La0.5Sr0.5)2CoO4 cathodes—Electronic structure, surface chemistry and oxygen reduction kinetics. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 207–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Marrocchelli, D.; Sun, L.; Yildiz, B. Dislocation in SrTiO3: Easy to reduce but not so fast for oxygen transport. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 4735–4748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Saranya, A.M.; Morata, A.; Pla, D.; Burriel, M.; Chiabrera, F.; Garbayo, I.; Hornes, A.; Kilner, J.A.; Tarancon, A. Unveiling the outstanding oxygen mass transport properties of Mn-rich perovskites in grain boundary-dominated La0.8Sr0.2(Mn1-xCox)0.85O3±δ nanostructures. Chem. Mater. 2018, 30, 5621–5629. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  135. Lee, D.; Gao, X.; Sun, L.; Jee, Y.; Poplawsky, J.; Farmer, T.O.; Fan, L.; Guo, E.-J.; Lu, Q.; Heller, W.T.; et al. Colossal oxygen vacancy formation at a fluorite-bixbyite interface. Nat. Commun. 2021, 11, 1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Baiutti, F.; Chiabrera, F.; Acosta, M.; Diercks, D.; Parfitt, D.; Santiso, J.; Wang, X.; Cavallaro, A.; Morata, A.; Wang, H.; et al. A high-entropy manganite in an ordered nanocomposite for long-term application in solid oxide cells. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 2660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Kuganathan, N.; Baiutti, F.; Tarancon, A.; Fleig, J.; Chroneos, A. Defects energetics in the SrTiO3-LaCrO3 system. Solid State Ion. 2021, 361, 115570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Saravanan, K.; Mason, C.W.; Rudola, A.; Wong, K.H.; Balaya, P. The First Report on Excellent Cycling Stability and Superior Rate Capability of Na3V2(PO4)3 for Sodium Ion Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2013, 3, 444–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Serras, P.; Palomares, V.; Goñi, A.; Kubiak, P.; Rojo, T. Electrochemical performance of mixed valence Na3V2O2x(PO4)2F3-2x/C as cathode for sodium-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 2013, 241, 56–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Sharma, N.; Serras, P.; Palomares, V.; Brand, H.E.A.; Alonso, J.; Kubiak, P.; Fdez-Gubieda, M.L.; Rojo, T. Sodium distribution and reaction mechanisms of a Na3V2O2(PO4)2F Electrode during use in a sodium-ion battery. Chem. Mater. 2014, 26, 3391–3402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Bui, K.M.; Dinh, V.A.; Okada, S.; Ohno, T. Hybrid functional study of the NASICON-type Na3V2(PO4)3: Crystal and electronic structures, and polaron-Na vacancy complex diffusion. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 30433–30439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Li, H.; Peng, L.; Zhu, Y.; Chen, D.; Zhang, X.; Yu, G. An advanced high-energy sodium ion full battery based on nanostructured Na2Ti3O7/VOPO4 layered materials. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 3399–3405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Shen, W.; Li, H.; Guo, Z.; Wang, C.; Li, Z.; Xu, Q.; Liu, H.; Wang, Y.; Xia, Y. Double-Nanocarbon Synergistically Modified Na3V2(PO4)3: An Advanced Cathode for High-Rate and Long-Life Sodium-Ion Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 15341–15351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Vellaisamy, M.; Reddy, M.V.; Chowdari, B.V.R.; Kalaiselvi, N. Exploration of AVP2O7/C (A = Li, Li0.5Na0.5, and Na) for High-Rate Sodium-Ion Battery Applications. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 24609–24618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Jin, T.; Li, H.; Zhu, K.; Wang, P.F.; Liu, P.; Jiao, L. Polyanion-type cathode materials for sodium-ion batteries. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 2342–2377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Zakharkin, M.V.; Drozhzhin, O.A.; Ryazantsev, S.V.; Chernyshov, D.; Kirsanova, M.A.; Mikheev, I.V.; Pazhetnov, E.M.; Antipov, E.V.; Stevenson, K.J. Electrochemical properties and evolution of the phase transformation behavior in the NASICON-type Na3+xMnxV2-x(PO4)3 (0≤x≤1) cathodes for Na-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 2020, 470, 228231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Kovrugin, V.M.; Chotard, J.-N.; Fauth, F.; Masquelier, C. Na7V3(P2O7)4 as a high voltage electrode material for Na-ion batteries: Crystal structure and mechanism of Na+ extraction/insertion by operando X-ray diffraction. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 21110–21121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Zhao, D.; Wang, C.; Ding, Y.; Ding, M.; Cao, Y.; Chen, Z. Will Vanadium-Based Electrode Materials Become the Future Choice for Metal-Ion Batteries? ChemSusChem 2022, 15, e202200479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Applsci 13 09619 g001
Figure 1. Schematic representation of (a) the long-range Na-ion diffusion and (b) the energy profile for the Na pathway required to migrate via the vacancy mechanism in NaZr2(PO4)3 [47].
Figure 1. Schematic representation of (a) the long-range Na-ion diffusion and (b) the energy profile for the Na pathway required to migrate via the vacancy mechanism in NaZr2(PO4)3 [47].
Applsci 13 09619 g001
Applsci 13 09619 g002
Figure 2. Schematic representation of (a) the crystal structure (space group C2/c) and (b) the Na ion diffusion paths (along the bc-plane) calculated in Na3Fe2(PO4)3. Here, the green, purple, and light blue atoms represent the Na ion hopping trajectories [95].
Figure 2. Schematic representation of (a) the crystal structure (space group C2/c) and (b) the Na ion diffusion paths (along the bc-plane) calculated in Na3Fe2(PO4)3. Here, the green, purple, and light blue atoms represent the Na ion hopping trajectories [95].
Applsci 13 09619 g002
Applsci 13 09619 g003
Figure 3. Schematic representation of (a) the crystal structure (space group C2/c) and (b) the Na ion diffusion paths along the ab-plane in monoclinic Na3V(PO4)2 [94].
Figure 3. Schematic representation of (a) the crystal structure (space group C2/c) and (b) the Na ion diffusion paths along the ab-plane in monoclinic Na3V(PO4)2 [94].
Applsci 13 09619 g003
Applsci 13 09619 g004
Figure 4. Schematic representation of (a) the Mg ion diffusion paths constructed in MgV2O4 and (b) the energy profile diagram for the Mg migration [45].
Figure 4. Schematic representation of (a) the Mg ion diffusion paths constructed in MgV2O4 and (b) the energy profile diagram for the Mg migration [45].
Applsci 13 09619 g004
Applsci 13 09619 g005
Figure 5. A schematic comparison of the potential power and energy density of oxygen ion batteries with related electrochemical technologies [50].
Figure 5. A schematic comparison of the potential power and energy density of oxygen ion batteries with related electrochemical technologies [50].
Applsci 13 09619 g005
Table 1. The activation energies of diffusion of Na in candidate Na-ion battery materials.
Table 1. The activation energies of diffusion of Na in candidate Na-ion battery materials.
MaterialActivation Energy/eVComments
NaZr2(PO4)30.26Ref. [47], vacancy mechanism
Na3Fe2(PO4)30.45Ref. [95], vacancy mechanism
Na3V(PO4)20.59Ref. [94], vacancy mechanism
NaNiO20.67Ref. [96], ab-plane
NaFeO20.65–0.67Ref. [97], vacancy mechanism
Na2MnSiO40.81Ref. [41], vacancy mechanism
Table 2. The activation energies of diffusion of Mg in candidate Mg-ion battery materials.
Table 2. The activation energies of diffusion of Mg in candidate Mg-ion battery materials.
MaterialActivation Energy/eVComments
MgV2O40.52Ref. [45], 3D
Mg6MnO80.86Ref. [109], 3D
MgTiO30.88Ref. [17]
Mg3Fe2Si3O122.19Ref. [112]
Table 3. The activation energies of oxygen diffusion in representative oxides.
Table 3. The activation energies of oxygen diffusion in representative oxides.
MaterialActivation Energy/eVComments
La2NiO4+δ0.56[121], anisotropic mechanism
GdBaCo2O5+δ0.60[122]
Sr0.75Y0.25CoO2.6251.56[123], isotropic mechanism, MD
La0.8Sr0.2MnO3−δ2.80[120]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sgourou, E.N.; Daskalopulu, A.; Tsoukalas, L.H.; Goulatis, I.L.; Vovk, R.V.; Chroneos, A. Kinetics of Ions in Post-Lithium Batteries. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 9619. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13179619

AMA Style

Sgourou EN, Daskalopulu A, Tsoukalas LH, Goulatis IL, Vovk RV, Chroneos A. Kinetics of Ions in Post-Lithium Batteries. Applied Sciences. 2023; 13(17):9619. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13179619

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sgourou, Efstratia N., Aspassia Daskalopulu, Lefteri H. Tsoukalas, Ioannis L. Goulatis, Ruslan V. Vovk, and Alexander Chroneos. 2023. "Kinetics of Ions in Post-Lithium Batteries" Applied Sciences 13, no. 17: 9619. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13179619

APA Style

Sgourou, E. N., Daskalopulu, A., Tsoukalas, L. H., Goulatis, I. L., Vovk, R. V., & Chroneos, A. (2023). Kinetics of Ions in Post-Lithium Batteries. Applied Sciences, 13(17), 9619. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13179619

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop