Next Article in Journal
An Exploratory In Vitro Microcomputed Tomographic Investigation of the Efficacy of Semicircular Apicoectomy Performed with Trephine Bur
Previous Article in Journal
Machine Learning-Based Text Classification Comparison: Turkish Language Context
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

The Opportunities and Challenges for the Rising Star of Soft Robots

Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Intelligent Morphing Mechanisms and Adaptive Robotics, School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(16), 9430; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13169430
Submission received: 9 August 2023 / Accepted: 17 August 2023 / Published: 20 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Soft Robots)
Robots tend to be designed to replace human beings, so as to efficiently finish some tasks in a repeatable or dangerous situation, bring us huge economic value and good services [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. Conventional robots, which refers to rigid/hard robots, are built by connecting rigid members made of metals or plastics at concrete joints, which are driven by electromagnetic motors [1,2,3]. They have been extensively used in industrial production [1,3], medical surgeries [8,9], and daily life [1], including industrial robots, Da Vinci medical robots, autonomous vacuum cleaners, etc. However, these rigid robots, with limited compliance and adaptability, risk manipulating fragile objects and interacting with humans [1,3]. Systematic designs and complex robot controls are required to guarantee the precision of actions and mitigate the safety concerns of robots [1,3], which may introduce great instability and high costs, due to the overall complexity. Therefore, the field of robots is eager to be further revolutionized. In recent years, soft robots have gradually entered the vision of scientists and engineers. They are primarily composed of soft materials, with Young’s modulus in the range of soft biological materials [3]. When compared to rigid robots, they have special advantages, including autonomous functions without feedback controls, high compliance, large deformation capabilities and freedom, as well as unprecedented adaptability and agility [1,2,3], enabling them to easily operate in unstructured terrains, confidently grasp fragile objects, and safely interact with humans when actuated by the matched driving sources [10]. The innovation core of soft robots lies in materials performance, programming structural changes, functional integration, and special applications. Nowadays, soft robots are still at an early stage of research and application; more advanced works are anticipated to promote the development of this field.
Soft materials are the main elements for constructing the body of soft robots. Silicon elastomers [11,12,13], liquid crystal elastomers [14], responsive films with layered structures [15,16], hydrogels [17], and ferrofluids [18] have been widely accepted for the fabrication of soft robots. Even so, new construction materials are still pursued to enrich the family of soft materials. By introducing structural design elements (shapes, cavities, etc.), anisotropic deformation elements (magnetic programming, molecular arrangement, folds, rigid and fibrous matrix arrangements, etc.), and functional elements (special structures, drugs, electronics, etc.) into soft materials, some dexterous and skillful soft robots can be completely fabricated. Deformation strategies and structural designs that determine the overall deformation results are also critical for soft robots. Developing new strategies and designs always open up new research directions for soft robots. Aimed at different soft materials, several fabrication techniques have been proposed to fabricate soft robots [1]. Creating new techniques tends to bring huge breakthroughs for soft robots. Moreover, as a promising research direction to improve the intelligence of soft robots, consideration of multifunctional integration is undoubtedly required in the fabrication process [19,20]. Additionally, the efficient actuation of soft robots based on different controlling methods (gas, fluids, light, temperature, electric field, magnetic field, etc.) enable their successful applications [10]. However, new or jointed controlling methods lack research, holding great potential for improving the action capabilities of soft robots.
Depending on the compliance, adaptability, and mechanical properties of soft robots, they possess great potential for biomedical applications, apart from simply grasping or manipulating fragile objects, which include medical surgeries, drug delivery, artificial organs, prostheses, and assistive wearable devices [8,9]. Particularly, the biomedical applications of untethered, small-scale soft robots are appealing, and a wide exploration space exists. Owing to their small size and soft nature, these soft robots can navigate in hard-to-reach, tortuous, narrow regions inside the biological body, and physically adapt to the tissues without damaging them [8,9]. Soft robots have exhibited unique capabilities in the treatment of some diseases (gastric ulcers [19], blood clots [21], tissue repairs [22], etc.), but there are still some challenges to perfectly match these diseases to soft robots. More special diseases should be investigated to find the ultimate biomedical applications of soft robots. By cooperating with doctors, the durability and reliability, and allergic, contact, and immediate and long-term immune responses to soft robots need to be considered [8].
Therefore, the research on soft robots is still in a period of rapid rising, according to the development laws of other successful scientific fields, and more chances need to be grabbed to contribute to this field. These aspects of construction materials, fabrication methods, deformation strategies, multifunctional integrations, control methods, and specific applications for soft robots should be carefully taken into account, promoting soft robots from the research stages to practical applications.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, Y.D. and B.L.; writing—review and editing, Y.D.; funding acquisition, B.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.”

Funding

This work was partly supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2022YFB4701200).

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Rothemund, P.; Kim, Y.; Heisser, R.H.; Zhao, X.; Shepherd, R.F.; Keplinger, C. Shaping the future of robotics through materials innovation. Nat. Mater. 2021, 20, 1582–1587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Rus, D.; Tolley, M.T. Design, fabrication and control of origami robots. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2018, 3, 101–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rus, D.; Tolley, M.T. Design, fabrication and control of soft robots. Nature 2015, 521, 467–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Li, M.; Pal, A.; Aghakhani, A.; Pena-Francesch, A.; Sitti, M. Soft actuators for real-world applications. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2022, 7, 235–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Laschi, C.; Mazzolai, B.; Cianchetti, M. Soft robotics: Technologies and systems pushing the boundaries of robot abilities. Sci. Robot. 2016, 1, eaah3690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kim, Y.; Zhao, X. Magnetic Soft Materials and Robots. Chem. Rev. 2022, 122, 5317–5364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rich, S.I.; Wood, R.J.; Majidi, C. Untethered soft robotics. Nat. Electron. 2018, 1, 102–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cianchetti, M.; Laschi, C.; Menciassi, A.; Dario, P. Biomedical applications of soft robotics. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2018, 3, 143–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sitti, M. Miniature soft robots—Road to the clinic. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2018, 3, 74–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, J.; Chortos, A. Control Strategies for Soft Robot Systems. Adv. Intell. Syst. 2022, 4, 2100165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hu, W.; Lum, G.Z.; Mastrangeli, M.; Sitti, M. Small-scale soft-bodied robot with multimodal locomotion. Nature 2018, 554, 81–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kim, Y.; Yuk, H.; Zhao, R.; Chester, S.A.; Zhao, X. Printing ferromagnetic domains for untethered fast-transforming soft materials. Nature 2018, 558, 274–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xia, N.; Jin, D.; Pan, C.; Zhang, J.; Yang, Z.; Su, L.; Zhao, J.; Wang, L.; Zhang, L. Dynamic morphological transformations in soft architected materials via buckling instability encoded heterogeneous magnetization. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 7514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, J.; Guo, Y.; Hu, W.; Soon, R.H.; Davidson, Z.S.; Sitti, M. Liquid Crystal Elastomer-Based Magnetic Composite Films for Reconfigurable Shape-Morphing Soft Miniature Machines. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2006191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dong, Y.; Wang, J.; Guo, X.; Yang, S.; Ozen, M.O.; Chen, P.; Liu, X.; Du, W.; Xiao, F.; Demirci, U.; et al. Multi-stimuli-responsive programmable biomimetic actuator. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 4087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dong, Y.; Wang, L.; Xia, N.; Wang, Y.; Wang, S.; Yang, Z.; Jin, D.; Du, X.; Yu, E.; Pan, C.; et al. Multi-stimuli-response programmable soft actuators with site-specific and anisotropic deformation behavior. Nano Energy 2021, 88, 106254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, C.; Lau, G.C.; Yuan, H.; Aggarwal, A.; Dominguez, V.L.; Liu, S.; Sai, H.; Palmer, L.C.; Sather, N.A.; Pearson, T.J.; et al. Fast and programmable locomotion of hydrogel-metal hybrids under light and magnetic fields. Sci. Robot. 2020, 5, eabb9822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sun, M.; Hao, B.; Yang, S.; Wang, X.; Majidi, C.; Zhang, L. Exploiting ferrofluidic wetting for miniature soft machines. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 7919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Dong, Y.; Wang, L.; Xia, N.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, C.; Pan, C.; Jin, D.; Zhang, J.; Majidi, C.; Zhang, L. Untethered small-scale magnetic soft robot with programmable magnetization and integrated multifunctional modules. Sci. Adv. 2022, 8, eabn8932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Xia, N.; Zhu, G.; Wang, X.; Dong, Y.; Zhang, L. Multicomponent and multifunctional integrated miniature soft robots. Soft Matter 2022, 18, 7464–7485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kim, Y.; Genevriere, E.; Harker, P.; Choe, J.; Balicki, M.; Regenhardt, R.W.; Vranic, J.E.; Dmytriw, A.A.; Patel, A.B.; Zhao, X. Telerobotic neurovascular interventions with magnetic manipulation. Sci. Robot. 2022, 7, eabg9907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zhang, J.; Ren, Z.; Hu, W.; Soon, R.H.; Yasa, I.C.; Liu, Z.; Sitti, M. Voxelated three-dimensional miniature magnetic soft machines via multimaterial heterogeneous assembly. Sci. Robot. 2021, 6, eabf0112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dong, Y.; Li, B. The Opportunities and Challenges for the Rising Star of Soft Robots. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 9430. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13169430

AMA Style

Dong Y, Li B. The Opportunities and Challenges for the Rising Star of Soft Robots. Applied Sciences. 2023; 13(16):9430. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13169430

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dong, Yue, and Bing Li. 2023. "The Opportunities and Challenges for the Rising Star of Soft Robots" Applied Sciences 13, no. 16: 9430. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13169430

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop