Next Article in Journal
Influence of the Mechanism of Fluid-Structure Interaction on Stiffness of Static Pressure Spindles and Slides
Previous Article in Journal
Date Fruit Classification Based on Surface Quality Using Convolutional Neural Network Models
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Review of the Dynamics Progress of Bubble Collapse within Droplet and Droplet Splash

1
Key Laboratory of Power Station Energy Transfer Conversion and System (Ministry of Education), School of Energy Power and Mechanical Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China
2
College of Mechanical and Transportation Engineering, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Beijing 102249, China
3
Beijing Key Laboratory of Process Fluid Filtration and Separation, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Beijing 102249, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(13), 7822; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13137822
Submission received: 6 June 2023 / Revised: 27 June 2023 / Accepted: 28 June 2023 / Published: 3 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Fluid Science and Technology)

Abstract

:
The dynamics of a cavitation bubble within a droplet is one of the hot research topics at present. The present paper summarizes the research progress of bubble collapse within droplets and associated droplet splash. Firstly, three typical structures of bubble collapse are introduced, together with the collapsing shock waves and the distribution of collapsing forces. Secondly, several typical forms of droplet splash are shown in terms of splash speed, splash direction, and dynamic mechanisms. Finally, the unsolved problems in the field of cavitation bubbles within droplets are proposed with perspectives.

1. Introduction

Cavitation bubbles within droplets are one of the hot research issues in the field of cavitation and bubble dynamics [1,2]. Figure 1 shows the fields involved in cavitation bubbles within droplets. During the fuel atomization [3,4,5,6], fuel droplets in internal combustion engines could be atomized into fine droplets by cavitation. Due to the decrease in the pressure inside the droplet, which is less than the local saturated pressure, a bubble could be formed inside the droplet. The degree of droplet cavitation determines the combustion efficiency of fuel and thus affects the operating conditions of internal combustion engines [7,8]. In the process of inkjet printing [9,10,11,12,13], a laser beam can produce a bubble in a high viscosity small ink droplet, thereby improving inkjet technology. In the process of military underwater explosions [2,2,14,15,16,17], the bubble migration process, shock wave, and liquid–surface splash process caused by bubble collapse are closely related to the research of cavitation bubbles. The bubble collapse jet generally points to a rigid wall, and the velocity is usually about 100 m/s. In the research of micropumps [18,19,20,21], the process of bubble collapse can transport the bubble vapor cloud to the bottom of the pipeline and achieve a millisecond response speed without fluid mechanics [22]. In the medical field [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30], acoustic droplet vaporization (ADV) is a physical process in which the pressure wave of ultrasound induces a phase transition, resulting in superheated liquid nanodroplets forming bubbles that provide ultrasound imaging contrast and other functions. It is widely used in many medical treatment [31,32], such as in the generation of cavitation bubbles within droplets in blood vessels and drug transport, imaging, embolization therapy, and treatment delivery. In the development of needle-free injection technology [33,34,35,36,37], the vaccine needle-free injection process is achieved by effectively utilizing the collapse of a shock wave within the droplet to form a jet. In the field of aerosols in the atmospheric environment, the jets and cavitation bubbles within droplets generated by the collapse of oceanic bubbles are one of the main sources of aerosols in seawater. The reasons for their formation are as follows. First, when a bubble rises to the water surface and bursts, and the bubble is entrained in the water column by previously broken waves, the bubble collapses and the surface film ruptures, and membrane droplets will be generated. When the surface shear stress is high enough, the water droplets will be torn from the surface wave [38,39,40,41,42,43].
In many fields, cavitation bubbles within droplets have broad application prospects. The essence of cavitation bubbles within droplets is that the process of bubble collapse leads to a severe multiphase flow phenomenon, accompanied by rich fluid phenomena. The main features include the formation of microjets [45,46,47], bubble migration [48,49], and the formation of microbubbles [45,50] during the collapse process of the cavitation bubble. During the splash process of the droplet, splashes and jets of different modes [51,52,53] and directions [54,55] are formed. A shock wave is generated during the collapse of the bubble within a droplet and causes a change in the pressure field in the droplet. When the pressure wave propagates to the free surface of the droplet, it will cause the surface of the droplet to oscillate and excite the droplet to splash. During the non-spherical collapse of the bubble under the free surface, a high-speed jet will be generated while moving away from the free surface. The current research on the dynamics of bubbles within droplets is still in the early stage. Many unsolved problems limit its wide applications. For example, the theoretical model suitable for the dynamics of cavitation bubble collapse within droplets still suffers many limitations. Based on these, the topic of cavitation bubbles within droplets is being given increasing attention by researchers [56].
The research progress of cavitation bubbles within droplets could be briefly introduced as follows. Avila et al. [52] used laser-induced suspended droplets and captured the process of bubble collapse within droplets through high-speed photography. The different situations were observed on the surfaces of droplets, including atomization, film formation, and droplet fragmentation. The propagation process of the shock wave inside the droplet was researched. Obreschkow and Mohamed [45,50,57] found that the collapse of a cavitation bubble within a droplet can generate two droplet jets. In addition, the surface of the droplet will reflect the shock wave generated by the collapse of the bubble, thereby inducing the generation of a large number of microbubbles. Subsequently, the evolution process of the shock wave of bubble within a droplet was verified through numerical simulation. Lv et al. [7] established a mathematical model focusing on the effect of viscosity. Zeng et al. [58] conducted numerical simulation (Open FOAM) research on the splash processes of suspended droplets. It showed that the radial acceleration of the droplet splash was caused by the oscillation of an internal bubble. Thoroddsen et al. [59] investigated the bubble initial position within the droplet and its effects on the form of the droplet splash.
This paper mainly introduces the dynamic processes of bubble collapse and induced droplet splash and summarizes the important research achievements in recent years. The main purposes of the following sections are given as follows: in Section 2, the forms of bubble collapse within droplets is introduced, including its typical forms and characteristics, and a mechanism explanation of bubble motion; in Section 3, the research on collapse shock waves is introduced; in Section 3.3, the distribution of forces during the collapse process is introduced; in Section 4, the typical droplet splash patterns are introduced together with the influencing dimensionless parameters, radius ratios, and eccentricity; in Section 5, the splash velocity is introduced with splash velocity, flow field analysis, and splash mechanism; in Section 6, the splash direction is introduced with splash direction control; in Section 7, the conclusion of this paper is given with perspectives.

2. Typical Forms of Cavitation Bubble Collapse

2.1. Microjets

Due to the influence of gravity on the droplet structure, researchers have conducted droplet cavitation experiments in spacecrafts [45,57]. Figure 2 shows the microjets formed during the collapse process of a cavitation bubble within a droplet [45]. Under the condition of microgravity, it shows a nearly spherical drop structure, and the cavitation bubble was induced by electric spark. Figure 2a shows the maximum volume state of a cavitation bubble within a droplet at an eccentric position. Figure 2b shows the state of a bubble forming a microjet within a droplet with microjet velocity greater than 50 m/s. The jet on the right side of Figure 2c shows the formation of a double jets structure on the droplet surface caused by bubble collapse, with a jet velocity of 6 m/s. It should be noted that the structure on the left side of the droplet is a droplet splash structure. In addition, this research indicates that the process of jets formation during cavitation bubble collapse within droplets is consistent with the process of bubble collapse under the free surface. There are two kinds of micro-jets formed during the collapse of a droplet cavitation, the micro-jet formed by the cavitation inside the droplet and the micro-jet formed on the surface of the droplet caused by the shock wave induced by the bubble collapse.
Figure 3 shows the jet structure during the collapse process of a cavitation bubble at a liquid surface [60]. During the process of bubble collapse, the bubble first collapses near the free surface, then the microjet passes through the center of the bubble, and finally evolves into a mushroom-shaped vapor cloud. At the same time, in the opposite direction to the bubble microjet, a pinnacle splash on the liquid surface forms. The vapor cloud mass is caused by the non-spherical evolution in the process of bubble collapse, and the vapor bubble moves away from the free surface. Additionally, the splash at the top is due to the increase of the pressure between the droplet and the bubble wall, resulting in the rupture of the free surface.
Figure 4 shows the motion process of the bubble wall and the formation mechanism of the vortex ring structure [61]. Among them, Figure 4a shows that the bubble wall begins to approach the free surface at the initial moment. Figure 4b shows the reverse direction of the pinnacle jet and the microjet formed by the bubble collapse on the free surface. The reflected flow passes through the bubble, which also leads to the second collapse starting from the lower side of the bubble. Figure 4c shows the expansion of the bubble volume after a single collapse process. Figure 4d shows the vortex ring structure generated during the later stage of the bubble collapse, caused by the pressure gradient at the edge of the bubble wall. And, a high-pressure stagnant flow ring is formed.
Based on this, it can be seen that due to the influence of a spherical free surface, the microjet process of the cavitation bubble within a droplet [46] is more complex than in the infinite fluid domain [62,63]. There are not only microjet processes, the evolution of a collapsed vapor cloud [64], and secondary cavitation jets in a cavitation bubble within a droplet, but also splash jets on the surface of the droplet.

2.2. Bubble Migration

The process of bubble migration is an important feature of the bubble collapse process [65]. Figure 5 contains high-speed photographs of the bubble migration process in the process of bubble collapse in a droplet under microgravity conditions [57]. Figure 5a–c show the first collapse process of the bubble, and Figure 5d–f show the rebound process of the bubble. It is obvious that the bubble undergoes significant migration during the rebound process and moves in the opposite direction away from its initial position.
If the local spherical surface near the initial position of the bubble is approximated to a free surface, its movement trend is consistent with the interaction between the free surface and the bubble. Figure 6 shows the theoretical verification process of bubble migration under a free surface based on the Kelvin impulse theory. It can effectively deal with the migration and deformation law of cavitation bubble’s centroid. In the Kelvin theory, it is assumed that the fluid domain is an incompressible, inviscid, and irrotational ideal fluid, and the bubble will undergo non-spherical deformation and migration along the axial symmetry direction during the volume oscillation. When the bubble evolves non-spherically near the free surface, a high-speed jet is often generated, and the bubble moves away from the free surface. Among them, the numbers 1~6 in the Figure 6a show the process of bubble growth under the free surface; the numbers 6~10 in the Figure 6b show the process of bubble collapse under the free liquid surface [48,66]. The reasons of cavitation migration could be explained as follows. Firstly, combined with the Kelvin impulse theorem, the migration away from the free surface occurs during the evolution of the cavity. Secondly, the fluid domain inside the droplet is affected by the surface tension of the free surface of the droplet. Thirdly, during the process of bubble collapse, the vapor mass moves downward.

2.3. Microbubble Cloud

The generation of a large number of microbubbles during the process of bubble collapse is a typical phenomenon as given by Obreschkow et al. [45,50,57]. It should be emphasized that this phenomenon is less significant under gravity. The reasons for this include that the ambient pressure under microgravity is low, and the spherical droplet structure could be remained.
Figure 7 shows the formation of microbubbles during the process of bubble collapse [45]. This type of submillimeter-sized microbubble could last for about 50 s during the process of bubble collapse. Figure 7a shows the initial moment of cavitation, and there are no microbubbles generated. Figure 7b shows the moment of the first collapse generating the microbubbles. Figure 7c shows the later stage of bubble collapse, with the disappearance of the microbubbles.

3. Shock Wave of Bubble Collapse

The shock wave formed by bubble collapse is often accompanied by an intense energy dissipation [67,68]. The collapse of the bubble transforms the potential energy stored in the bubble into the kinetic energy of the surrounding flow. There is mutual interations between the shock wave and the bubble collapse process [69,70], inducing the formation of microjets from the bubble [71] and erosion [72,73,74]. Hence, this section mainly introduces the impact of shock waves on the collapse process of cavitation bubbles within droplets, the evolution process of a shock wave inside the droplet [52,75], and the stress analysis.

3.1. Form of Shock Wave

The collapse process of a cavitation bubble within a droplet is usually accompanied by an intense shock wave [76]. Due to the uniquely restricted environment within a droplet, during the bubble collapse, a shock wave will continuously reflect and focus inside the droplet, further affecting the bubble collapse and droplet splash. Figure 8 shows the microbubbles that form through shock waves under different eccentric positions [50]. The subfigure on the left side is the experimental diagram of microbubbles with small eccentricity. The lower subfigure on the left is the experimental figure of microbubbles with large eccentricity. The right subfigure is the numerical simulations of energy density under the corresponding conditions. The red region represents high energy density; the blue region represents low energy density. The experimental and numerical results are consistent, verifying that the energy distribution of a shock wave during the collapse of an eccentric bubble is altered by the reflection of a liquid surface. When the eccentricity is small, it is the unilateral energy is primary. When the eccentricity is large, the bilateral energy is of great importance. It can be seen that the distribution of microbubbles during the collapse process of a bubble can measure the energy distribution of the bubble collapse. On the other hand, it also reflects that the structure of a cavitation bubble within a droplet can also could impact the propagation of the shock wave.

3.2. Evolution of Shock Wave

Figure 9 shows the evolution process of a shock wave inside cavitation bubbles within droplets [52]. Figure 9a shows a high-speed photography time-domain diagram of a cavitation bubble within 1.45 µs. The long axis of the droplet radius is 1.7 mm and the short axis is 1.1 mm. Here, the cavitation bubble is placed at an eccentric position. Figure 9b shows the numerical simulations corresponding to the shock wave evolution of bubble collapse within the droplet. The COMSOL 5.0 solver was employed for the numerical solution. Among them, the shock wave reflects at the free surface of the droplet, and then being focused. Figure 9c shows the top view corresponding to the image in Figure 9b, where red lines represent compressive pressure and blue lines represent tensile pressure. Furthermore, the blue low-pressure area represents the predicted area of secondary cavitation occurrence. In Figure 9d, the negative pressure region is circular and located at the equatorial position of an ellipsoidal droplet. It is also verified that the secondary cavitation of the droplet occurs in the area where the shock wave is reflected by the free surface. Based on this, it can be seen that the surface structure of the droplet and the relative position of the bubble have a significant impact on the reflection and focusing of the shock wave.

3.3. Force in The Early Stage of Collapse

3.3.1. Types of Force

Based on the classical Rayleigh–Plesset equation, the dynamic equation of the cavitation bubblecan be expressed as Equation (1) [77]:
p p = 2 σ R + ρ 1 R d 2 R d t 2 + 3 2 ρ 1 d R d t 2 + 4 μ 1 R d R d t
In Equation (1), P is the pressure inside the bubble and P is the environmental pressure, σ is the surface tension coefficient, ρ 1 is the liquid density, μ 1 is the liquid viscosity, and R is the bubble radius. The first item on the right side of Equation (1) represents the surface tension term, the second and the third items represent the inertial force term, and the fourth item represents the viscous force term. It can be seen that the dynamic process of droplet bubble formation is mainly influenced by surface tension, inertial force, and viscous force [77].

3.3.2. Distribution of Force

Figure 10 shows the distribution of force over time during the evolution of the cavitation bubble within a droplet [77]. Among them, Figure 10a shows the effect of surface tension on the evolution of a cavitation bubble within a droplet. I–III represent three stages respectively. At the initial stage (I), it is mainly affected by surface tension. And, the influence of the surface tension gradually decreases in the second stage (II). At the third stage, the influence of the surface tension is weakened.
Figure 10b shows the effect of an inertial force on the evolution of the cavitation bubble within the droplet. The promoting effect of inertial force on the evolution of the bubble at the first stage can be basically ignored. At the second stage (II), the inertial force shows a slow growth trend and gradually increases its impact on the evolution of the bubble. At the third stage (III), the inertial force sharply increases, and the evolution rate of the bubble is significantly affected by the inertial force.
Figure 10c shows the effect of viscous force on the evolution of the cavitation bubble within a droplet. At the first stage, the inhibitory effect of viscous forces on the bubble evolution slowly increases. At the second stage (II), the effect of viscous force on the bubble shows a fluctuating pattern. At the third stage, the effect of viscous force increases sharply firstly and then decreases sharply. It is worth emphasizing that the growth stage of the bubble wall determines the size of the potential energy of the bubble wall, which is affected by the movement of the bubble wall in the subsequent bubble collapsing stage and the rebounding process. The shock wave induced by bubble collapse is also related with the bubble wall motion.

4. Typical Forms of Droplet Splash

The form of the droplet splash is an important characterization of droplet splash dynamics [53,78]. The setup of droplet splash experiments, the induction of splash forms [46,79], the quantitative analysis of splash, and the final mechanism analysis are all important components of the research on the dynamics of droplet splash. On this basis, this section introduces a high-speed photography experimental platform for the splash dynamics of a bubble within a suspended droplet and four typical splash cases. It summarizes the quantitative research methodology for splash dynamics, explores the changes in splash velocity and splash direction of the droplet [80,81], and finally provides a highly recognized explanation mechanism of the splash dynamics [66,82].

4.1. Experimental System

Figure 11 shows the experimental setup of a cavitation bubble within a suspension droplet and the definition of its eccentricity. In Figure 11a, the core components of the experimental setup system are the transducer with a frequency of 27.4 kHz and the aluminum acoustic reflector. The droplet suspension is maintained by controlling the sound radiation pressure. Afterwards, a bubble is induced by a laser in the suspension droplet. Figure 11b shows the relevant definitions of the dimensionless parameters of the radius ratio and the eccentricity of the droplet. The radius ratio dimensionless parameter is related to laser energy, and the energy scale E is the work done by a droplet to form a bubble with a volume of V d under environmental pressure with E = κ E 1 / V d . Among them, κ is the percentage of laser energy and E 1 is the laser energy. The dimensionless parameter of eccentricity is related to the initial position of the cavitation bubble, where φ is the ratio of the short axis radius R x to the long axis radius R y . ε y and ε x are the short axis eccentricity and the long axis eccentricity, respectively.

4.2. Typical Splash Forms

Figure 12 shows four typical splash forms of the droplet during the collapse process of a bubble within a suspended droplet. By changing the ratio radius, different splash forms of the droplet were achieved. Among them, Figure 12a shows the atomization case, in which the droplet is completely shattered into tiny droplets during the bubble collapse process, presenting a mist-like appearance. Figure 12b shows the unstable liquid film form, in which the droplet initially appears as a grid-like splash, then evolves into a liquid film, and finally disperses into small droplets. Figure 12c shows a stable liquid film form, in which the droplet gradually exhibits a hemispherical liquid film shape, and ultimately maintains the liquid film structure. Figure 12d shows the coarse crushing form, in which multiple scattered splashes are generated in the short axis direction of the droplet during the bubble collapse process, and then the ellipsoidal droplet is stretched into a long strip shape.

5. Splash Velocity

5.1. Definition of Splash Structure

Figure 13 shows the definition of splash structure [83]. It shows the stable coronal splash of the droplet, including the main peak of the splash, the liquid film of splash, and other structures. Among them, it mainly includes the height of the main peak of the splash Hspike, the height of the liquid film of the splash Hspray, the splash width Wbase, and the width of the liquid film of the splash Wspray. The structured definition of droplet splash is the basis for quantitative research. Currently, the research on the main peak of droplet splash has attracted most of attention.

5.2. Comparison of Splash Velocity

The jet velocity of the main peak is an important factor in droplet splash [84,85,86]. Figure 14 shows the distribution of the vertex velocity of droplet splash [59]. It can be seen that the velocity of the main peak of the droplet splash is between 1100 and 1400 m/s [87]. Here, the main peak of the splash will be rapidly decomposed into small spray within time duration about 4 μs. The speed of the splash will drop sharply to the speed of sound (in the air). It can be seen that the splash form changes sharply with the evolution stage of bubble collapse, and its dynamic characteristics also undergo significant change.

5.3. Splash Flow Field

The analysis of the flow field of a droplet splash is an important basis for revealing the dynamic operation mechanism of the splash. Researchers mainly explain the internal mechanism of droplet splash by researching the distribution of velocity and pressure in the flow field of the droplet splash [88,89,90,91]. Figure 15 shows the distribution of the flow field of droplet splash [58]. At the bubble expansion stage ( t = 20   μ s ), the surface of the droplet has no splash. At the later stage ( t = 50   μ s ), the non-uniform distribution of velocity and pressure along the surface of the droplet leads to droplet fluctuations. At the stage of bubble collapse ( t = 70   μ s ), the liquid flows towards the center of the droplet. At the bubble collapse stage ( t = 110   μ s ), the disturbance amplitude of the surface of the droplet increases. Afterwards, pressure pulses are generated by bubble expansion ( t = 126   μ s ). This accelerates the movement of the fluid surface, causing the trough to transform into a peak, and the jet is formed at the position of the previous trough. The velocity of the jet is increased by the pressure pulse, resulting in more jets being generated after the second bubble collapsing process ( t = 240   μ s ).

5.4. Splash Mechanism

5.4.1. Singularity Theory of Interface Depression

Currently, the theory of interface depression singularity is one of the important mechanisms [92]. Figure 16 shows the theoretical schematic of the interface depression singularity [92]. The red line represents the initial stage of splash, the blue line represents the middle process of splash, and the green line represents the further strengthening of splash. The three red dots in the figure represent the singularity of the free surface, and the two arrow directions represent the directions that may cause a splash of the droplet during the surface depression and collapse process. The curvature change of the free surface is the main cause of the splash due to the radial outward movement of the liquid surface at the depression.

5.4.2. Taylor Instability Mechanism

Another explanation for droplet splash is the Taylor instability mechanism. Figure 17 shows a schematic of the Taylor instability mechanism of bubble collapse within droplets [93]. Firstly, the surface of a droplet is disturbed by the shock wave of bubble collapse. When the bubble oscillates, the surface of a droplet is accelerated, and the disturbance amplitude of the surface is increased. When the bubble wall and droplet splash are in contact with the disturbed surface, interfacial instability occurs [94]. Among them, n is the number of wave peaks on the droplet surface, R d is the droplet radius, η is the disturbance amplitude of the surface, P d is the pressure on the droplet surface, R b is the bubble radius, and P R is the pressure at the bubble boundary.

6. Splash Direction

6.1. Splash Direction Control

The direction control technology of the droplet splash is being developed [54]. Figure 18 shows the variation of the droplet jet direction versus the position and the time of bubble initiation [55]. Figure 18a is variation of Ejection angle with displacement. It can be observed that there is a linear relationship between the initial injection direction of the liquid column and the position of the bubble initiation. A liquid column injection within the range of −45° to 45° could be achieved through varying x (distance between droplet center and initial position of bubbles) between −900 μm and 900 μm. Due to the radial symmetry of the droplet, the liquid column can be discharged in any direction within a 90° cone. Figure 18b is variation of Ejection angle with time of different displacement. It can be found that under the three displacement relationships, the ejection angle gradually decreases with time. It shows that the splash will gradually stabilize over time.

6.2. Splash Direction Mechanism

The control of droplet splash could be accomplished through the interface-focusing mechanism [95,96]. Figure 19 is a schematic of the shock wave reflection path for the cavitation bubble within a droplet [55]. It can be seen that, after the first rebound of the waveform on the spherical droplet interface, the shock wave is focused and reflected to a certain position, which is different with the initial position of the bubble. This provides strong theoretical support for the controllable operation of droplet splash.

7. Conclusions and Perspecitves

7.1. Conclusions

(1) The movement of the bubble wall during the collapsing process of a cavitation bubble within a droplet is significantly influenced by the droplet surface, leading to three typical structures (microjets, bubble migration, and the microbubble group respectively).
(2) The bubble collapsing shock wave could be formed during the evolution of microbubble groups within the droplet. And, the reflection and focusing of the shock wave inside the droplet lead to the complex droplet structure.
(3) The forms, velocity, and direction of droplet splash are closely related to the evolution process of the bubble collapse and the shock wave. The quantitative control of droplet splash speed and the direction can be achieved by controlling the bubble collapse.

7.2. Perspective

(1) The theoretical aspects of the dynamics of cavitation bubbles within droplets are still not clear enough.
(2) The implementation of a controllable droplet structure under a gravity environment is important.
(3) The quantitative control and implementation of droplet splash are not yet unified.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.Z. (Yuning Zhang 1) and X.Z.; investigation, X.Z., S.Z., J.Y., Y.Y. and H.W.; resources, Y.Z. (Yuning Zhang 1) and X.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.Z. (Yuning Zhang 1) and X.Z.; writing—review & editing, Y.Z. (Yuning Zhang 1), Z.L. and Y.Z. (Yuning Zhang 2); literature review, X.Z., S.Z., J.Y., Y.Y. and H.W.; supervision, Y.Z. (Yuning Zhang 1) and Y.Z. (Yuning Zhang 2); project administration, Y.Z. (Yuning Zhang 1) and Y.Z. (Yuning Zhang 2). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project Nos.: 51976056 and 52076215).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Guo, W.; Li, H.; Wang, J.; Wang, Y.; Huang, C. Reserch progress on interaction between a single cavitation and free surface. Chin. J. Theor. Appl. Mech. 2019, 51, 1682–1698. [Google Scholar]
  2. Wang, S.; Zhang, A.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, S.; Cui, P. Bubble dynamics and its applications. J. Hydrodyn. 2018, 30, 975–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Suh, H.K.; Lee, C.S. Effect of cavitation in nozzle orifice on the diesel fuel atomization characteristics. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 2008, 29, 1001–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Payri, F.; Bermúdez, V.; Payri, R.; Salvador, F.J. The influence of cavitation on the internal flow and the spray characteristics in diesel injection nozzles. Fuel 2004, 83, 419–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Watanabe, H.; Nishikori, M.; Hayashi, T.; Suzuki, M.; Kakehashi, N.; Ikemoto, M. Visualization analysis of relationship between vortex flow and cavitation behavior in diesel nozzle. Int. J. Engine Res. 2015, 16, 5–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wu, Z.; Shi, Z.; Zhao, H.; Yao, F.; Liu, H.; Li, W.; Xu, J. Effects of bubbles in the liquid jet on the air-blast atomization. Fuel 2020, 266, 117117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lü, M.; Ning, Z.; Yan, K.; Fu, J.; Song, Y.; Sun, C. Breakup of cavitation bubbles within the diesel droplet. Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 2014, 27, 198–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yang, X.; Xue, R.; Wang, N.; Huang, Z.; Zhang, H.; Liu, X.; Chen, L.; Hou, Y. Review of internal cavitating flow in injection nozzles, external atomization and cooling in liquid nitrogen spray cooling systems. Cryogenics 2023, 131, 103661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Delrot, P.; Modestino, M.A.; Gallaire, F.; Psaltis, D.; Moser, C. Inkjet Printing of Viscous Monodisperse Microdroplets by Laser-Induced Flow Focusing. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2016, 6, 024003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Fraters, A.; van den Berg, M.; de Loore, Y.; Reinten, H.; Wijshoff, H.; Lohse, D.; Versluis, M.; Segers, T. Inkjet Nozzle Failure by Heterogeneous Nucleation: Bubble Entrainment, Cavitation, and Diffusive Growth. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2019, 12, 064019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Delrot, P.; Modestino, M.A.; Psaltis, D.; Moser, C.; Gu, B.; Helvajian, H.; Piqué, A. Laser-assisted inkjet printing of highly viscous fluids with sub-nozzle resolution. In Proceedings of the Laser 3D Manufacturing III, San Francisco, CA, USA, 4 December 2016. [Google Scholar]
  12. Kondo, T.; Ando, K. One-way-coupling simulation of cavitation accompanied by high-speed droplet impact. Phys. Fluids 2016, 28, 33303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Martin, G.D.; Hoath, S.D.; Hutchings, I.M. Inkjet printing—The physics of manipulating liquid jets and drops. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2008, 105, 12001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, Z.F.; Wang, C.; Wang, L.K.; Zhang, A.M.; Silberschmidt, V.V. Underwater explosion of cylindrical charge near plates: Analysis of pressure characteristics and cavitation effects. Int. J. Impact Eng. 2018, 121, 91–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Ming, F.R.; Zhang, A.M.; Xue, Y.Z.; Wang, S.P. Damage characteristics of ship structures subjected to shockwaves of underwater contact explosions. Ocean Eng. 2016, 117, 359–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, N.N.; Wu, W.B.; Zhang, A.M.; Liu, Y.L. Experimental and numerical investigation on bubble dynamics near a free surface and a circular opening of plate. Phys. Fluids 2017, 29, 107102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, A.; Wang, S.; Peng, Y.; Ming, F.; Liu, Y. Research progress in underwater explosion and its damage to ship structures. Chin. J. Ship Res. 2019, 14, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  18. Lew, K.S.F.; Klaseboer, E.; Khoo, B.C. A collapsing bubble-induced micropump: An experimental study. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2007, 133, 161–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Khoo, B.C.; Klaseboer, E.; Hung, K.C. A collapsing bubble-induced micro-pump using the jetting effect. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2005, 118, 152–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dijkink, R.; Ohl, C. Laser-induced cavitation based micropump. Lab Chip 2008, 8, 1676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Karri, B.; Pillai, K.S.; Klaseboer, E.; Ohl, S.; Khoo, B.C. Collapsing bubble induced pumping in a viscous fluid. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2011, 169, 151–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, Y. A review of rotating stall in reversible pump turbine. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 2017, 231, 1181–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Fabiilli, M.L.; Haworth, K.J.; Fakhri, N.H.; Kripfgans, O.D.; Carson, P.L.; Fowlkes, J.B. The role of inertial cavitation in acoustic droplet vaporization. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 2009, 56, 1006–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yang, Y.; Yang, D.; Zhang, Q.; Guo, X.; Raymond, J.L.; Roy, R.A.; Zhang, D.; Tu, J. The influence of droplet concentration on phase change and inertial cavitation thresholds associated with acoustic droplet vaporization. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2020, 148, L375–L381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Lin, C.; Pitt, W.G. Acoustic Droplet Vaporization in Biology and Medicine. Biomed. Res. Int. 2013, 2013, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Qamar, A.; Wong, Z.Z.; Fowlkes, J.B.; Bull, J.L. Dynamics of acoustic droplet vaporization in gas embolotherapy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010, 96, 143702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Lacour, T.; Valier-Brasier, T.; Coulouvrat, F. Ultimate fate of a dynamical bubble/droplet system following acoustic vaporization. Phys. Fluids 2020, 32, 51702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sivakumar, M.; Tang, S.Y.; Tan, K.W. Cavitation technology—A greener processing technique for the generation of pharmaceutical nanoemulsions. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2014, 21, 2069–2083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kang, S.; Huang, Y.; Yeh, C. Characterization of Acoustic Droplet Vaporization for Control of Bubble Generation Under Flow Conditions. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2014, 40, 551–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jean-Michel, E.; Ayache, B. Therapeutic Ultrasound, 1st ed.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 157–362. [Google Scholar]
  31. Wong, Z.Z.; Kripfgans, O.D.; Qamar, A.; Fowlkes, J.B.; Bull, J.L. Bubble evolution in acoustic droplet vaporization at physiological temperature via ultra-high speed imaging. Soft Matter 2011, 7, 4009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, L.Y.; Zheng, S.S. Advances in low-frequency ultrasound combined with microbubbles in targeted tumor therapy. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 2019, 20, 291–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jagadeesh, G.; Prakash, G.D.; Rakesh, S.G.; Allam, U.S.; Krishna, M.G.; Eswarappa, S.M.; Chakravortty, D. Needleless Vaccine Delivery Using Micro-Shock Waves. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 2011, 18, 539–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Schramm-Baxter, J.; Mitragotri, S. Needle-free jet injections: Dependence of jet penetration and dispersion in the skin on jet power. J. Control. Release 2004, 97, 527–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Stachowiak, J.C.; Li, T.H.; Arora, A.; Mitragotri, S.; Fletcher, D.A. Dynamic control of needle-free jet injection. J. Control. Release 2009, 135, 104–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Tagawa, Y.; Oudalov, N.; El, G.A.; Sun, C.; Lohse, D. Needle-free injection into skin and soft matter with highly focused microjets. Lab Chip 2013, 13, 1357–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Rosselló, J.M.; Ohl, C. Bullet jet as a tool for soft matter piercing and needle-free liquid injection. Biomed. Opt. Express 2022, 13, 5202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kudryavtsev, V.N.; Makin, V.K. Impact of Ocean Spray on the Dynamics of the Marine Atmospheric Boundary Layer. Bound.-Lay. Meteorol. 2011, 140, 383–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Fabrice, V. Ocean Spray. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 2015, 47, 507–538. [Google Scholar]
  40. Ramon, J.C.; Duncan, C.B. Bubble and Aerosol Spectra Produced by a Laboratory ‘Breaking Wave’. J. Geophys. Res. 2015, 47, 507–538. [Google Scholar]
  41. François, R.; George, A. Film drop distributions from bubbles bursting in seawater. J. Geophys. Res. Ocean 1991, 96, 10681–10688. [Google Scholar]
  42. Blanchard, D.C.; Syzdek, L.D. Film drop production as a function of bubble size. J. Geophys. Res. 1988, 93, 3649–3654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Resch, F.J.; Darrozes, J.S.; Afeti, G.M. Marine liquid aerosol production from bursting of air bubbles. J. Geophys. Res. 1986, 91, 1019–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Khan, M.M.; Hélie, J.; Gorokhovski, M.; Sheikh, N.A. Experimental and numerical study of flash boiling in gasoline direct injection sprays. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2017, 123, 377–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Obreschkow, D.; Kobel, P.; Dorsaz, N.; de Bosset, A.; Nicollier, C.; Farhat, M. Cavitation bubble dynamics inside liquid drops in microgravity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 97, 94502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Robert, E.; Lettry, J.; Farhat, M.; Monkewitz, P.A.; Avellan, F. Cavitation bubble behavior inside a liquid jet. Phys. Fluids 2007, 19, 67106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kobel, P.; Obreschkow, D.; de Bosset, A.; Dorsaz, N.; Farhat, M. Techniques for generating centimetric drops in microgravity and application to cavitation studies. Exp. Fluids 2009, 47, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Blake, J.R.; Taib, B.B.; Doherty, G. Transient cavities near boundaries Part 2. Free surface. J. Fluid Mech. 1987, 181, 197–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Liu, J.L.; Xiao, W.; Yao, X.L.; Huang, X.H. Dynamics of a bubble in a liquid fully confined by an elastic boundary. Phys. Fluids 2021, 33, 63303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Obreschkow, D.; Dorsaz, N.; Kobel, P.; de Bosset, A.; Tinguely, M.; Field, J.; Farhat, M. Confined shocks inside isolated liquid volumes: A new path of erosion? Phys. Fluids 2011, 23, 101702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Lindinger, A.; Hagen, J.; Socaciu, L.D.; Bernhardt, T.M.; Woste, L.; Duft, D.; Leisner, T. Time-resolved explosion dynamics of H2O droplets induced by femtosecond laser pulses. Appl. Opt. 2004, 43, 5263–5269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Gonzalez Avila, S.R.; Ohl, C. Fragmentation of acoustically levitating droplets by laser-induced cavitation bubbles. J. Fluid Mech. 2016, 805, 551–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Heijnen, L.; Quinto-Su, P.A.; Zhao, X.; Ohl, C.D. Cavitation within a droplet. Phys. Fluids 2009, 21, 91102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Rosselló, J.M.; Reese, H.; Ohl, C. Dynamics of pulsed laser-induced cavities on a liquid–gas interface: From a conical splash to a ‘bullet’ jet. J. Fluid Mech. 2022, 939, A35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Padilla-Martinez, J.P.; Ramirez-San-Juan, J.C.; Berrospe-Rodriguez, C.; Korneev, N.; Aguilar, G.; Zaca-Moran, P.; Ramos-Garcia, R. Controllable direction of liquid jets generated by thermocavitation within a droplet. Appl. Opt. 2017, 56, 7167–7173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Mohamed, F. What We Learned from Cavitation Bubbles in Microgravity, 1st ed.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2020; pp. 12–17. [Google Scholar]
  57. Farhat, M.; Obreschkow, D.; Kobel, P.; Dorsaz, N.; De Bosset, A. Interaction of a cavitation bubble with a spherical free surface. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Cavitation, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 11–15 September 2006. [Google Scholar]
  58. Zeng, Q.; Gonzalez-Avila, S.R.; Voorde, S.T.; Ohl, C. Jetting of viscous droplets from cavitation-induced Rayleigh–Taylor instability. J. Fluid Mech. 2018, 846, 916–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Thoroddsen, S.T.; Takehara, K.; Etoh, T.G.; Ohl, C.D. Spray and microjets produced by focusing a laser pulse into a hemispherical drop. Phys. Fluids 2009, 21, 112101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Supponen, O.; Obreschkow, D.; Kobel, P.; Farhat, M. Detailed Jet Dynamics in a Collapsing Bubble. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2015, 656, 12038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Patrascioiu, A.; Fernández-Pradas, J.M.; Palla-Papavlu, A.; Morenza, J.L.; Serra, P. Laser-generated liquid microjets: Correlation between bubble dynamics and liquid ejection. Microfluid. Nanofluid. 2014, 16, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Lindau, O.; Lauterborn, W. Cinematographic observation of the collapse and rebound of a laser-produced cavitation bubble near a wall. J. Fluid Mech. 2003, 479, 327–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Li, S.; Han, R.; Zhang, A.M.; Wang, Q.X. Analysis of pressure field generated by a collapsing bubble. Ocean Eng. 2016, 117, 22–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Supponen, O.; Obreschkow, D.; Tinguely, M.; Kobel, P.; Dorsaz, N.; Farhat, M. Scaling laws for jets of single cavitation bubbles. J. Fluid Mech. 2016, 802, 263–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Robinson, P.B.; Blake, J.R.; Kodama, T.; Shima, A.; Tomita, Y. Interaction of cavitation bubbles with a free surface. J. Appl. Phys. 2001, 89, 8225–8237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Blake, J.R.; Gibson, D.C. Growth and collapse of a vapour cavity near a free surface. J. Fluid Mech. 1981, 111, 123–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Lauterborn, W.; Vogel, A. Shock Wave Emission by Laser Generated Bubbles; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; pp. 67–103. [Google Scholar]
  68. Vogel, A.; Busch, S.; Parlitz, U. Shock wave emission and cavitation bubble generation by picosecond and nanosecond optical breakdown in water. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1996, 100, 148–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Sankin, G.N.; Simmons, W.N.; Zhu, S.L.; Zhong, P. Shock wave interaction with laser-generated single bubbles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 95, 34501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Akhatov, I.; Lindau, O.; Topolnikov, A.; Mettin, R.; Vakhitova, N.; Lauterborn, W. Collapse and rebound of a laser-induced cavitation bubble. Phys. Fluids 2001, 13, 2805–2819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Chahine, G.L.; Kapahi, A.; Choi, J.; Hsiao, C. Modeling of surface cleaning by cavitation bubble dynamics and collapse. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2016, 29, 528–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Philipp, A.; Lauterborn, W. Cavitation erosion by single laser-produced bubbles. J. Fluid Mech. 1998, 361, 75–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Supponen, O.; Obreschkow, D.; Kobel, P.; Tinguely, M.; Dorsaz, N.; Farhat, M. Shock waves from nonspherical cavitation bubbles. Phys. Rev. Fluids 2017, 2, 093601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Brujan, E.A.; Keen, G.S.; Vogel, A.; Blake, J.R. The final stage of the collapse of a cavitation bubble close to a rigid boundary. Phys. Fluids 2002, 14, 85–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Krivokorytov, M.S.; Vinokhodov, A.Y.; Sidelnikov, Y.V.; Krivtsun, V.M.; Kompanets, V.O.; Lash, A.A.; Koshelev, K.N.; Medvedev, V.V. Cavitation and spallation in liquid metal droplets produced by subpicosecond pulsed laser radiation. Phys. Rev. E 2017, 95, 31101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Ohl, S.; Klaseboer, E.; Khoo, B.C. Bubbles with shock waves and ultrasound: A review. Interface Focus 2015, 5, 20150019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Lv, M.; Ning, Z.; Sun, C. Study on the growth and collapse of cavitation bubble within a droplet. Chin. J. Theor. Appl. Mech. 2016, 48, 857–866. [Google Scholar]
  78. Pain, A.; Hui Terence Goh, B.; Klaseboer, E.; Ohl, S.; Cheong Khoo, B. Jets in quiescent bubbles caused by a nearby oscillating bubble. J. Appl. Phys. 2012, 111, 54912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Moghtadernejad, S.; Lee, C.; Jadidi, M. An Introduction of Droplet Impact Dynamics to Engineering Students. Fluids 2020, 5, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Pearson, A.; Cox, E.; Blake, J.R.; Otto, S.R. Bubble interactions near a free surface. Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem. 2004, 28, 295–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Kiyama, A.; Tagawa, Y.; Ando, K.; Kameda, M. Effects of a water hammer and cavitation on jet formation in a test tube. J. Fluid Mech. 2016, 787, 224–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Longuet-Higgins, M.S. Bubbles, breaking waves and hyperbolic jets at a free surface. J. Fluid Mech. 1983, 127, 103–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Zhang, S.; Wang, S.P.; Zhang, A.M. Experimental study on the interaction between bubble and free surface using a high-voltage spark generator. Phys. Fluids 2016, 28, 32109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Dadvand, A.; Khoo, B.C.; Shervani-Tabar, M.T. A collapsing bubble-induced microinjector: An experimental study. Exp. Fluids 2009, 46, 419–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Robles, V.; Gutierrez-Herrera, E.; Devia-Cruz, L.F.; Banks, D.; Camacho-Lopez, S.; Aguilar, G. Soft material perforation via double-bubble laser-induced cavitation microjets. Phys. Fluids 2020, 32, 42005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Kang, Y.J.; Cho, Y. Gravity–capillary jet-like surface waves generated by an underwater bubble. J. Fluid Mech. 2019, 866, 841–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Reuter, F.; Ohl, C. Supersonic needle-jet generation with single cavitation bubbles. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2021, 118, 134103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Bempedelis, N.; Zhou, J.; Andersson, M.; Ventikos, Y. Numerical and experimental investigation into the dynamics of a bubble-free-surface system. Phys. Rev. Fluids 2021, 6, 013606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Li, J.; Rong, J. Bubble and free surface dynamics in shallow underwater explosion. Ocean Eng. 2011, 38, 1861–1868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Li, T.; Zhang, A.; Wang, S.; Li, S.; Liu, W. Bubble interactions and bursting behaviors near a free surface. Phys. Fluids 2019, 31, 42104. [Google Scholar]
  91. Han, B.; Köhler, K.; Jungnickel, K.; Mettin, R.; Lauterborn, W.; Vogel, A. Dynamics of laser-induced bubble pairs. J. Fluid Mech. 2015, 771, 706–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Chen, R.C.; Yu, Y.T.; Su, K.W.; Chen, J.F.; Chen, Y.F. Exploration of water jet generated by Q-switched laser induced water breakdown with different depths beneath a flat free surface. Opt. Express 2013, 21, 445–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Wang, J.; Li, H.; Guo, W.; Wang, Z.; Du, T.; Wang, Y.; Abe, A.; Huang, C. Rayleigh–Taylor instability of cylindrical water droplet induced by laser-produced cavitation bubble. J. Fluid Mech. 2021, 919, A42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Lauterborn, W.; Kurz, T.; Mettin, R.; Ohl, C. Advances in Chemical Physics, 1st ed.; John Wiley & Sons Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1999; pp. 333–350. [Google Scholar]
  95. Padilla-Martinez, J.P.; Ramirez-San-Juan, J.C.; Korneev, N.; Banks, D.; Aguilar, G.; Ramos-Garcia, R. Breaking the Rayleigh-Plateau instability limit using thermocavitation within a droplet. At. Spray 2013, 23, 487–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Tan, M.K.; Friend, J.R.; Yeo, L.Y. Interfacial jetting phenomena induced by focused surface vibrations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 103, 24501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Introduction figure of the fields involved in cavitation bubbles within droplets. (a) fuel atomization [44]; (b) inkjet printing [9]; (c) underwater explosion [14]; (d) micropump research [18]; (e) acoustic droplet vaporization technology [26]; (f) needle-free injection [36]; (g) marine aerosol research [42].
Figure 1. Introduction figure of the fields involved in cavitation bubbles within droplets. (a) fuel atomization [44]; (b) inkjet printing [9]; (c) underwater explosion [14]; (d) micropump research [18]; (e) acoustic droplet vaporization technology [26]; (f) needle-free injection [36]; (g) marine aerosol research [42].
Applsci 13 07822 g001
Figure 2. The Microjets formed during the collapse process of cavitation bubble within the droplet [45]. (a) Bubble with maximum radius. (b) Microjet. (c) Two liquid jets.
Figure 2. The Microjets formed during the collapse process of cavitation bubble within the droplet [45]. (a) Bubble with maximum radius. (b) Microjet. (c) Two liquid jets.
Applsci 13 07822 g002
Figure 3. Microjet structure during bubble collapse process [60].
Figure 3. Microjet structure during bubble collapse process [60].
Applsci 13 07822 g003
Figure 4. The movement process of the bubble wall and the formation mechanism of stagnant flow ring structure [61]. (a) Bubble wall begins to approach the free surface. (b) The pinnacle jet and the microjet. (c) The expansion of the bubble volume. (d) The vortex ring structure.
Figure 4. The movement process of the bubble wall and the formation mechanism of stagnant flow ring structure [61]. (a) Bubble wall begins to approach the free surface. (b) The pinnacle jet and the microjet. (c) The expansion of the bubble volume. (d) The vortex ring structure.
Applsci 13 07822 g004
Figure 5. The bubble migration during the collapse process of a cavitation bubble within a droplet [57]. (a) The initial stage of bubble collapse. (b) Bubble volume begins to shrink. (c) The end of bubble collapse. (d) Bubble rebounds. (e) Bubble volume expansion again. (f) Bubble migration.
Figure 5. The bubble migration during the collapse process of a cavitation bubble within a droplet [57]. (a) The initial stage of bubble collapse. (b) Bubble volume begins to shrink. (c) The end of bubble collapse. (d) Bubble rebounds. (e) Bubble volume expansion again. (f) Bubble migration.
Applsci 13 07822 g005
Figure 6. Theoretical results of bubble growth and collapse near the free surface [66]. (a) Bubble growth. (b) Bubble collapse.
Figure 6. Theoretical results of bubble growth and collapse near the free surface [66]. (a) Bubble growth. (b) Bubble collapse.
Applsci 13 07822 g006
Figure 7. The formation of microbubbles during the process of bubble collapse [45]. (a) The initial moment of cavitation. (b) The microbubbles. (c) The later stage of bubble collapse.
Figure 7. The formation of microbubbles during the process of bubble collapse [45]. (a) The initial moment of cavitation. (b) The microbubbles. (c) The later stage of bubble collapse.
Applsci 13 07822 g007
Figure 8. The microbubbles form a shock wave under different eccentric position [50].
Figure 8. The microbubbles form a shock wave under different eccentric position [50].
Applsci 13 07822 g008
Figure 9. Evolution process of shock wave inside cavitation bubble within droplet [52]. (a) High speed photography. (b) The front view of shock wave evolution. (c) The top view of shock wave evolution. (d) Negative pressure region of the droplet.
Figure 9. Evolution process of shock wave inside cavitation bubble within droplet [52]. (a) High speed photography. (b) The front view of shock wave evolution. (c) The top view of shock wave evolution. (d) Negative pressure region of the droplet.
Applsci 13 07822 g009
Figure 10. The distribution of force over time during the evolution of the cavitation bubble within a droplet [77]. (a) The effect of surface tension on the evolution process of the cavitation bubble within a droplet; (b) the effect of inertial force on the evolution process of the cavitation bubble within a droplet; (c) The effect of viscous force on the evolution of the cavitation bubble within a droplet.
Figure 10. The distribution of force over time during the evolution of the cavitation bubble within a droplet [77]. (a) The effect of surface tension on the evolution process of the cavitation bubble within a droplet; (b) the effect of inertial force on the evolution process of the cavitation bubble within a droplet; (c) The effect of viscous force on the evolution of the cavitation bubble within a droplet.
Applsci 13 07822 g010aApplsci 13 07822 g010b
Figure 11. Experimental setup of cavitation bubble within suspension droplet and the definition of eccentricity [52]. (a) Experimental setup. (b) Definitions of the dimensionless parameters.
Figure 11. Experimental setup of cavitation bubble within suspension droplet and the definition of eccentricity [52]. (a) Experimental setup. (b) Definitions of the dimensionless parameters.
Applsci 13 07822 g011
Figure 12. Four typical splash forms of droplet during the collapse process of bubble within suspended droplet [52]. (a) Atomization. (b) The unstable liquid film. (c) The stable liquid film. (d) The coarse crushing.
Figure 12. Four typical splash forms of droplet during the collapse process of bubble within suspended droplet [52]. (a) Atomization. (b) The unstable liquid film. (c) The stable liquid film. (d) The coarse crushing.
Applsci 13 07822 g012
Figure 13. Definition figure of splash structure [83].
Figure 13. Definition figure of splash structure [83].
Applsci 13 07822 g013
Figure 14. Distribution rule of vertex velocity of droplet splash [59].
Figure 14. Distribution rule of vertex velocity of droplet splash [59].
Applsci 13 07822 g014
Figure 15. Distribution of the flow field of droplet splash [58]. (a) The initial stage of splash (b) Flow field distribution of splash initial. (c) The evolution stages of splash (d) Flow field distribution of splash evolution. (e) The later stage of splash evolution (f) Flow field distribution of splash evolution later stage.
Figure 15. Distribution of the flow field of droplet splash [58]. (a) The initial stage of splash (b) Flow field distribution of splash initial. (c) The evolution stages of splash (d) Flow field distribution of splash evolution. (e) The later stage of splash evolution (f) Flow field distribution of splash evolution later stage.
Applsci 13 07822 g015
Figure 16. Theoretical schematic of interface depression singularity [92].
Figure 16. Theoretical schematic of interface depression singularity [92].
Applsci 13 07822 g016
Figure 17. Schematic of the Taylor instability mechanism of bubble collapse within droplet [93].
Figure 17. Schematic of the Taylor instability mechanism of bubble collapse within droplet [93].
Applsci 13 07822 g017
Figure 18. The variation of droplet jet direction with the position and the time of bubble initiation [55]. (a) The variation of ejection angle with displacement. (b) The variation of Ejection angle with time of different displacement.
Figure 18. The variation of droplet jet direction with the position and the time of bubble initiation [55]. (a) The variation of ejection angle with displacement. (b) The variation of Ejection angle with time of different displacement.
Applsci 13 07822 g018
Figure 19. Schematic of shock wave reflection path for cavitation bubble collapse within droplet [55].
Figure 19. Schematic of shock wave reflection path for cavitation bubble collapse within droplet [55].
Applsci 13 07822 g019
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, S.; Ying, J.; Yang, Y.; Wang, H.; Li, Z.; Zhang, Y. A Review of the Dynamics Progress of Bubble Collapse within Droplet and Droplet Splash. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 7822. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13137822

AMA Style

Zhang Y, Zhang X, Zhang S, Ying J, Yang Y, Wang H, Li Z, Zhang Y. A Review of the Dynamics Progress of Bubble Collapse within Droplet and Droplet Splash. Applied Sciences. 2023; 13(13):7822. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13137822

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Yuning, Xiaofei Zhang, Shurui Zhang, Jiaze Ying, Yihao Yang, Hongbo Wang, Zhaohao Li, and Yuning Zhang. 2023. "A Review of the Dynamics Progress of Bubble Collapse within Droplet and Droplet Splash" Applied Sciences 13, no. 13: 7822. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13137822

APA Style

Zhang, Y., Zhang, X., Zhang, S., Ying, J., Yang, Y., Wang, H., Li, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2023). A Review of the Dynamics Progress of Bubble Collapse within Droplet and Droplet Splash. Applied Sciences, 13(13), 7822. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13137822

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop