Assessment of Nanobag as a New Safety System in the Frontal Sled Test

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This paper assesses the new safety technology of nanobag with respect to the airbag. The topic is very interesting. The paper is well-organized and the results are obvious. I recommend the acceptance of this paper.  It will be better if more recent (2020-2020) references are cited. 

Author Response

Thank you for your hints and comments. I tried to follow them and all the changes are highligted in the manuscript.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Thank you for allowing me to read about this interesting topic.

I would appreciate the authors respond and address the following issues: 

The introduction is not very thorough and does not refer to the literature. I recommend adding literature information to support the research.

Please check Line 86 - 99 - 142 - 161 - 187 - 223 - 232 - 246 - 249 - 257 - 276 - 286 - 300 - 305 - 312 - 315 - 345 - see "Error! Change Reference source not found.." Please modify.

Table 2 and Table 4 are very difficult to read. Please format them in a way that they are more understandable

The conclusions are perhaps reductive compared to the amount of data presented. Please review them by trying to link to the literature and point out the innovations of this research.

 

 

Author Response

Thank you for your hints and comments. I tried to follow them and all the changes are highligted in the manuscript.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

I have carefully reviewed the paper Assessment of nanobag as a new safety system in the frontal sled test. The subject matter (comparison between an innovative system called nanobag with the traditional airbag in the event of a frontal crash) is current, interesting and decidedly innovative as it addresses the delicate problem of non-standard seat configurations in futuristic assisted-driving vehicles. The modeling of the various components is clearly indicated, as well as the specifications of the tests. The simulations showed that the performance is comparable to that of the traditional airbag, a result that should be verified through live tests.

Pay attention to lines 142, 161, 187, 223, 232, 246, 249, 286, 300, 305, 312, 315, 345 for reference not found.

After these lines are corrected, the paper can be accepted.

Author Response

Thank you for your hints and comments. I tried to follow them and all the changes are highligted in the manuscript.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Thanks for the revisions.

The paper is more readable and the conclusion analyses the results in more depth.

Good work and good luck with your next research.

Author Response

Thank you for the revision and for your comments. I really appreciate it. 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx