Intelligence and Usability Empowerment of Smartphone Adaptive Features

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors find out the usability of adaptive features in smartphones. The effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction level of different adaptive features are evaluated. 

I provide the following remarks which authors have to take into account in the next improved version.

1) The edition of equations 1 and 2 should be done more professionally. 

2) There are some related previous works by the authors that are not cited in this article.

3) Explain in detail, the new contributions in this article, with respect to the previous related works of the authors.

4) The authors must present the comparison of their results with the results of other authors, with other proposed methodologies.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

Thank you very much for giving us the opportunity to revise the manuscript. We would like to thank the editor and all the reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions. Based on the feedback, we have revised our manuscript. We marked the revisions in the manuscript as red color. For clarity, we have marked our responses in blue. We also highlight the revised content in the draft to facilitate the reviewer and editor.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

- what are the existing good study cases of Smartphone Adaptive Features?

- lines 60-72: try to simplify the description as these are known knowledge by the people.

- line 74: suggest adding references on UX and UI from this journal, such as Liu, W.; Lee, K.-P.; Gray, C.M.; Toombs, A.L.; Chen, K.-H.; Leifer, L. Transdisciplinary Teaching and Learning in UX Design: A Program Review and AR Case Studies. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 10648.

- line 113: suggest adding references on UCD, such as Norman, D. A., & Draper, S. W. (1986). User centered system design: New perspectives on human-computer interaction.

- what are the differences between UCD and HCD? 

- line 201: suggest adding references on Generation Y and Z interaction design.

- When citing references 26, 27, 30, and 31, avoid putting them at the end of the paragraphs. Instead, please include a more in-depth discussion. 

- Formulas 1 and 2 are not well formatted.

- what do the results indicate for other contexts beside mobile usability? 

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

Thank you very much for giving us the opportunity to revise the manuscript. We would like to thank the editor and all the reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions. Based on the feedback, we have revised our manuscript. We marked the revisions in the manuscript as red color. For clarity, we have marked our responses in blue. We also highlight the revised content in the draft to facilitate the reviewer and editor.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

Interesting topic. Well written article. Methodologically correct. Interesting to the readership. References adequately support the content. It's a difficult topic to cover, but the authors did a great job. Accept

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

Thank you very much for giving us the opportunity to revise the manuscript. We would like to thank the editor and all the reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions. Based on the feedback, we have revised our manuscript. We marked the revisions in the manuscript as red color. For clarity, we have marked our responses in blue. We also highlight the revised content in the draft to facilitate the reviewer and editor.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx