Nighttime Image Dehazing Based on Point Light Sources

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

1. In introduction section at line number 84, a space should be added before the reference Zhu et al.[32].

2. In introduction section at line number 95, the reference for "He's" work should be added.

3. A comparison study between the master paper (He's work) and the proposed work is required to clearly distinguish the difference of these two works and contribution of the paper.

4. In related work section  the reference for "John Wiley et al" work is missing. Same for He et al. at line number 123 in this section and yang et al. at line number 155.

5. I it not defined for equation 3. Every parameter of all equations should be clearly mentioned.

6. At line number 178, mention algorithm 1, not only 1.

7. Statistical analysis is required to see whether the difference between different algorithms with the proposed one is significant or not.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

1. The title is good and interesting but too much specific, need to expand according the methodology.

2. There is no conclusion and future work in the abstract. please provide statistical conclusion.

3. The contribution in the introduction are not very clear, especially 2 and 3. please provide clear explaination of these contributions

4. it will be better to provide a table for related work instead of explaination one by one.

5. it will be more better if the blockdiagram of the proposed method is present the in the paper

6. I did not fine the experimental results in term of images. it will be better provide some analysis results as well.

7. it will better to plot the graph of the table 1-4 as well

8. the statistical conclusion must be in the conclusion.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors used different types of similarity and dissimilarity index to compare the methods. But whether that comparison is statistically meaningful or not that should be proved through proper statistical method analysis containing p-value. The author may go through any statistical analysis book to make this point clear.

The difference between DCP and proposed method should include in a tabular form within result section not in the conclusion.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf