Next Article in Journal
Special Issue on Materials and Technologies in Oral Research
Next Article in Special Issue
Experimental Investigation of Crystal Blocking in Drainage Pipes for Tunnels in the Karst Region
Previous Article in Journal
Development of a Novel Gear-like Disk Resonator Applied in Gyroscope
Previous Article in Special Issue
Research on the Stress Characteristics of Initial Tunnel Supports Based on Active Load Adjustment
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Mechanical Behaviors of Existing Large-Diameter Tunnel Induced by Horseshoe-Shaped Undercrossing Twin Tunnels in Gravel

Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(14), 7344; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12147344
by Jianye Li 1,2, Qian Fang 1,2,*, Xiang Liu 3, Jianming Du 1,2, Gan Wang 1,2 and Jun Wang 1,2
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(14), 7344; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12147344
Submission received: 31 May 2022 / Revised: 15 July 2022 / Accepted: 19 July 2022 / Published: 21 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Deep Rock Mass Engineering: Excavation, Monitoring, and Control)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The novelty of this paper is significant enough to publish on “Applied Sciences”. Due to some issues that need improvement before publication, therefore my decision is acceptance with minor revisions.

Here are my comments for improving manuscript:

1.      Introduction:

·   The introduction provides background information and set the context. Therefore, to make introduction clearer, please consider to state research questions and research objectives.

2.      Literature Review:

· Literature Review section plays an important role in the research, therefore please add this section in this manuscript.

3.      Monitoring data analysis: The results are quite good, however there is a lack of discussions. Please consider to discuss thoroughly research limitations and practical implications.

4.      Conclusion: conclusion will be improved by emphasizing the research contributions and future work. However, there is lack of recommendations for future research. Please add these.

5.      References:

·    Some references are too old (over ten years). Please consider to update new ISI articles to improve this section.

Author Response

please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

This is a very interesting case study on the Subway excavation below the existing Qinghuayuan tunnel in Beijing.

However, it has lack of a convenient *article structure*. "*Material and methods*, *Results*, as well as *Discussion*" were missed in the manuscript. In my opinion, if the authors could rearrange its structure, it would be more convenient for a research paper (and not be confused with a “Report”). Besides, I would expect more information on the sensors used as accuracy, range, model, producer, etc. Please review the cohesion of the text for a research paper and English writing. For example, avoid using *past tense* in a sentence and in the next one utilizing *present tense*.

I recommend the paper to go through “Major Revisions”.

Author Response

please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The novelty of this paper is significant to publish in the Journal. Thus, my decision is an acceptance for a publication.

Reviewer 2 Report

After the required revisions, the paper is ready to publish.

Back to TopTop