Next Article in Journal
A Comparison of Electrical Breakdown Models for Polyethylene Nanocomposites
Previous Article in Journal
Efficient Mobile Vehicle Data Sharing Scheme Based on Consortium Blockchain
Previous Article in Special Issue
Secondary Mandible Reconstruction with Computer-Assisted-Surgical Simulation and Patient-Specific Pre-Bent Plates: The Algorithm of Virtual Planning and Limitations Revisited
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Tutorial

How to Create and 3D Print a Model of the Skull and Orbit for Craniomaxillofacial Surgeons

by
Léonard Bergeron
*,
Jordan Gornitsky
and
Michelle Bonapace-Potvin
Plastic Surgery Department, CIUSSS du Nord-de-l’Île-de-Montréal, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC H4J 1C5, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(12), 6153; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12126153
Submission received: 4 May 2022 / Revised: 29 May 2022 / Accepted: 15 June 2022 / Published: 17 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 3D Medical Imaging Diagnosis for Oral and Maxillofacial Applications)

Abstract

:

Featured Application

This video article offers concise step-by-step instructions for surgeons interested in printing their own three-dimensional models for use in the treatment of cranio-maxillo-facial pathologies.

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) anatomical models are used in many ways in cranio-maxillo-facial (CMF) surgery, including being used to press-fit plates, mold splints, and for student teaching. Their use has many advantages, including the possibility of lowering operative time and allowing for more precise reconstructions with personalized plates, meshes, and splints. This can now be done in-house to speed up model availability for trauma surgery as well. Three-dimensional printers and software are quickly evolving—printers now are easily accessible, and the models are inexpensive to print. However, for a surgeon with no IT training, 3D printing even a simple anatomic model may be a challenge. The purpose of this article is to offer simple, step-by-step video tutorials demonstrating the process of extracting a CMF model from a patient CT scan, doing basic manipulation to the model, and then printing it in-house with a prosumer grade 3D printer. It is our hope that this user-friendly article will allow more surgeons and scientists to use 3D printing and its advantages.

1. Introduction

The printing of three-dimensional (3D) models for cranio-maxillo-facial (CMF) surgery is growing in popularity, in part due to their multiple uses (press-fitting plates and meshes, fabricating occlusal splints) [1,2,3] and their many advantages (lowering operating time, increasing accuracy of reconstruction, etc.) [4,5]. The technology behind 3D printing has also become much more user friendly, 3D printers are now affordable and the models themselves are inexpensive to create [1,2,6,7,8]. However, there remains a steep learning curve for surgeons with no IT training.
In this article, we showcase three videos demonstrating a concise step-by-step process for extracting a bony model from a CT scan, applying basic modifications, and 3D printing it in-house. It is our hope that this will make 3D printing more accessible to CMF surgeons worldwide.

2. Requirements

The following software are required, which are available free of charge for non-commercial use: 3D Slicer [9] v4.11 (Slicer community, http://www.slicer.org accessed on 1 May 2022), Autodesk MeshMixer v3.5.474 (Autodesk, San Rafael, CA, USA), and Ultimaker Cura v4.13.1 (Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands) for sending files to filament printers. The 3D Slicer is widely known in the medical community, Autodesk Meshmixer is used extensively in dentistry [10], and Ultimaker Cura is a well-known open-source slicer upon which many other slicers are built.

3. Steps

Having access to a 3D printer is only a small part of the printing process. Creating the patient model to print is currently the limiting factor for most surgeons and scientists. Figure 1 illustrates the overall process of creating a 3D bone model of the skull or orbit from imaging, manipulating, and sending it to the printer.

3.1. Skull Model Creation from a CT Scan Using 3D Slicer

The first part of video 1 [https://youtu.be/v2AgYAjd1qM] demonstrates how to create a simple skull model from a CT scan and export it for use in a 3D software. This process of isolating and selecting a structure (i.e., the skull) is called segmentation. Once the structure is segmented, the three-dimensional model can be displayed and saved.
In the second part of video 1 [https://youtu.be/v2AgYAjd1qM], additional information is provided to allow advanced users to further refine the selection of thin bone as can be found in the orbit. An advanced selection tool is explained as well as a technique to smooth out the remaining defects.

3.2. Model Manipulation Using Autodesk Meshmixer

In video 2 [https://youtu.be/VNA-uCBkADE], the Autodesk Meshmixer is used to correct errors in the generated skull model. Virtual Surgical Planning (VSP) is performed at this step. Here, basic manipulations of the model such as cutting off unnecessary parts and removing loose bone parts are performed. Generally, it is useful to remove unnecessary anatomic regions in order to reduce printing time [1,4,11]. More complex VSP cases can be outsourced to most companies offering CMF plates and screws [1,2].

3.3. Preparing the Model for Printing and Sending It to the Printer (Slicing) Using Ultimaker Cura

Video 3 [https://youtu.be/50n2agH7_2M] demonstrates the slicing and printing process using Ultimaker Cura. To send a 3D model to a filament or resin printer, it needs to be opened in a “slicer” software (not to be confused with 3D Slicer). This software is usually supplied by the printer manufacturer. This software automatically adds supports for printing, configures printing parameters, and sends the necessary instructions to the printer to print the model.
If the model is required in the operating room, it can be wrapped in a sterile plastic bag. Some resin printing materials are certified for sterilization and do not require sterile bag wrapping for usage in the operating field.
The two most common types of 3D printers are filament and resin printers. Filament printers come at a wide range of prices and work by depositing thin layers of plastic in order to form a shape. Generally speaking, the technology used for filament printers is more mature. A variety of plastic filaments exist to create models of different colors, weight, texture, and biomechanical properties. PLA filaments have been shown to the be adequate, reliable, and inexpensive for use in CMF model printing [1,2]. One can expect a relatively high printing reliability [1] with automatically defined settings on prosumer grade printers. An adequate printer usually costs between USD 3000 and 10,000. Although cheaper printers exist, the considerable amount of time required for the assembly and manual calibration of the printer, to find by trial-and-error optimal printing parameters, as well as their high print failure rate make them less than ideal for busy clinicians starting with 3D printing.
At this time, resin printing also appears to be a very promising technology as it often allows for faster printing of complex CMF models. However, resin printing is still a very messy process. It involves manipulating liquid resin, cleaning models with alcohol, and curing the model with UV light. Sometimes, models also need to be “cooked” at a specific temperature to fully cure. This takes a considerable amount of time for a clinician, as well as a large working space with adequate ventilation and protective equipment.

4. Applications

Three-dimensional imaging alone is useful for diagnosis and surgical planning. Three-dimensional printed models such as this one have many additional benefits. They permit a better 3D visualization of defects/fractures than can be seen by coronal, sagittal, and axial cuts on a CT scan. Additionally, these models are useful in the teaching of fellows, residents, and medical students. Once the basics are mastered, more advanced steps allow for broad applications. For example, for a simple unilateral orbital fracture, the contralateral (intact) side can be isolated, mirrored, and printed. Since the models are sized to scale, plates can be pre-bent and sterilized for use [1], decreasing surgical time [4].

5. Limitations of In-House 3D Printing

This method demonstrates the printing of an anatomical model of the pathology. To perform more complex prints, an additional step of virtual reduction and/or osteotomies is necessary. The Autodesk Meshmixer allows for certain basic manipulations, but more complicated virtual reductions and bone movements are often outsourced to software engineers who have access to more powerful software. The VSP models can then be sent back over the internet for printing locally [1,2]. The approval of local regulations, such as FDA [12] or Health Canada, also needs to be taken into account before using in-house 3D printed models for patient care.

6. Conclusions

This article presents a simple and accessible method for in-house 3D printing. We use videos to demonstrate three easy steps to 3D print an orbit. First, we show how to extract images from a CT scan to a slicer software. Then, we demonstrate some simple modifications by virtual surgical planning (VSP). Finally, we show how to export and print a model. As the technology behind VSP and 3D printing evolves and gets more user friendly, it will gain even further uptake by clinicians and scientists.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.B., J.G. and M.B.-P.; data curation, J.G. and M.B.-P.; methodology, L.B., J.G. and M.B.-P.; project administration, M.B.-P.; supervision, L.B.; writing—original draft, L.B., J.G. and M.B.-P.; writing—review and editing, L.B., J.G. and M.B.-P. All authors contributed to each step of this article. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bergeron, L.; Bonapace-Potvin, M.; Bergeron, F. In-house 3D Model Printing for Acute Cranio-maxillo-facial Trauma Surgery: Process, Time, and Costs. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Glob. Open 2021, 9, e3804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Bergeron, L.; Bonapace-Potvin, M.; Bergeron, F. Printing in Time for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Trauma Surgery: Key Parameters to Factor in [Online First]. Craniomaxillofacial Trauma Reconstr. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Han, H.H.; Shim, J.-H.; Lee, H.; Kim, B.Y.; Lee, J.-S.; Jung, J.W.; Yun, W.-S.; Baek, C.H.; Rhie, J.-W.; Cho, D.-W. Reconstruction of Complex Maxillary Defects Using Patient-specific 3D-printed Biodegradable Scaffolds. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Glob. Open 2018, 6, e1975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Msallem, B.; Beiglboeck, F.; Honigmann, P.; Jaquiery, C.; Thieringer, F. Craniofacial Reconstruction by a Cost-Efficient Template-Based Process Using 3D Printing. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Glob. Open 2017, 5, e1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Sharaf, B.; Kuruoglu, D.; Cantwell, S.R.; Alexander, A.E.; Dickens, H.J.; Morris, J.M. EPPOCRATIS: Expedited Preoperative Point-of-Care Reduction of Fractures to Normalized Anatomy and Three-Dimensional Printing to Improve Surgical Outcomes. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2022, 149, 695–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Lor, L.S.; Massary, D.A.; Chung, S.A.; Brown, P.J.; Runyan, C.M. Cost Analysis for In-house versus Industry-printed Skull Models for Acute Midfacial Fractures. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Glob. Open 2020, 8, e2831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Lynn, A.Q.; Pflibsen, L.R.; Smith, A.A.; Rebecca, A.M.; Teven, C.M. Three-dimensional Printing in Plastic Surgery: Current Applications, Future Directions, and Ethical Implications. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Glob. Open 2021, 9, e3465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Padilla, P.L.; Mericli, A.F.; Largo, R.D.; Garvey, P.B. Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing versus Conventional Surgical Planning for Head and Neck Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2021, 148, 183–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Fedorov, A.; Beichel, R.; Kalpathy-Cramer, J.; Finet, J.; Fillion-Robin, J.-C.; Pujol, S.; Bauer, C.; Jennings, D.; Fennessy, F.; Sonka, M.; et al. 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2012, 30, 1323–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Thurzo, A.; Urbanova, W.; Novak, B.; Waczulikova, I.; Varga, I. Utilization of a 3D Printed Orthodontic Distalizer for Tooth-Borne Hybrid Treatment in Class II Unilateral Malocclusions. Materials 2022, 15, 1740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Naftulin, J.S.; Kimchi, E.Y.; Cash, S.S. Streamlined, Inexpensive 3D Printing of the Brain and Skull. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0136198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. USFDA. Discussion Paper: 3D Printing Medical Devices at the Point of Care. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/media/154729/download (accessed on 12 October 2021).
Figure 1. The three main steps and their associated software required to produce an in-house 3-dimensional printed craniofacial model: 3D Slicer v4.11 (Slicer community, http://www.slicer.org). Autodesk MeshMixer v3.5.474 (Autodesk, San Rafael, CA, USA). Slicer for many filament printers: Ultimaker Cura v4.13.1 (Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands).
Figure 1. The three main steps and their associated software required to produce an in-house 3-dimensional printed craniofacial model: 3D Slicer v4.11 (Slicer community, http://www.slicer.org). Autodesk MeshMixer v3.5.474 (Autodesk, San Rafael, CA, USA). Slicer for many filament printers: Ultimaker Cura v4.13.1 (Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands).
Applsci 12 06153 g001
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bergeron, L.; Gornitsky, J.; Bonapace-Potvin, M. How to Create and 3D Print a Model of the Skull and Orbit for Craniomaxillofacial Surgeons. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 6153. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12126153

AMA Style

Bergeron L, Gornitsky J, Bonapace-Potvin M. How to Create and 3D Print a Model of the Skull and Orbit for Craniomaxillofacial Surgeons. Applied Sciences. 2022; 12(12):6153. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12126153

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bergeron, Léonard, Jordan Gornitsky, and Michelle Bonapace-Potvin. 2022. "How to Create and 3D Print a Model of the Skull and Orbit for Craniomaxillofacial Surgeons" Applied Sciences 12, no. 12: 6153. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12126153

APA Style

Bergeron, L., Gornitsky, J., & Bonapace-Potvin, M. (2022). How to Create and 3D Print a Model of the Skull and Orbit for Craniomaxillofacial Surgeons. Applied Sciences, 12(12), 6153. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12126153

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop