Next Article in Journal
Development of an Eddy Current Test Configuration for Welded Carbon Steel Pipes under the Change in Physical Properties
Next Article in Special Issue
Numerical Simulation and Experiment of a High-Efficiency Tunnel Oxide Passivated Contact (TOPCon) Solar Cell Using a Crystalline Nanostructured Silicon-Based Layer
Previous Article in Journal
Predicting Partner’s Digital Transformation Based on Artificial Intelligence
Previous Article in Special Issue
Enhancement of Schottky Junction Silicon Solar Cell with CdSe/ZnS Quantum Dots Decorated Metal Nanostructures
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

CuInSe2-Based Near-Infrared Photodetector

1
School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST), Cheomdangwagi-ro, Buk-gu, Gwangju 61006, Korea
2
School of Energy Engineering, Korea Institute of Energy Technology, Ujeong-ro, Naju-si 58217, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(1), 92; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12010092
Submission received: 5 December 2021 / Revised: 21 December 2021 / Accepted: 22 December 2021 / Published: 22 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Selected Papers from GPVC Conferences)

Abstract

:
Near-infrared (NIR) photodetectors have interesting roles in optical fiber communications and biomedical applications. Conventional NIR photodetectors have been realized using InGaAs and Ge, of which the cut-off wavelengths exceed 1500 nm. Si-based photodetectors exhibit limited external quantum efficiency at wavelengths longer than 1000 nm. By synthesizing a CuInSe2 compound on a glass substrate, photodetectors that can detect optical wavelengths longer than 1100 nm have been realized in this study. The bandgap energies of the CuInSe2 thin films were tuned by varying the Cu/In ratio from 1.02 to 0.87. The longest cut-off wavelength (1309 nm) was obtained from a CuInSe2 thin film having a Cu/In ratio of 0.87. The responsivity of the photodiode was measured under the illumination of a 1064 nm laser light. The photo responses exhibited linear response up to 2.33 mW optical illumination and a responsivity of 0.60 A/W at −0.4 V.

1. Introduction

Nowadays, near-infrared (NIR) photodetectors which can convert optical signals to electrical signals are getting considerable interest for night-vision imaging, optical fiber communications, biomedical imaging, vegetation monitoring, and security applications due to the strong propagation and low attenuation characteristics of NIR light [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Conventionally, InGaAs and Ge-based photodetectors with cut-off wavelengths exceeding 1500 nm have been used for NIR photodetectors. Si-based photodetectors are challenging when used to detect the NIR wavelength range and show low external quantum efficiency due to their low cut-off wavelength of 1100 nm [7,8]. However, Ge-based photodetectors suffer from a high dark current (~10 mA/cm2) that is orders of magnitude higher than the ~0.5 μA/cm2 of InGaAs photodetectors. This leads to low signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) and responsivity [9,10,11]. InGaAs-based photodetectors have issues related to expensive manufacturing processes [12,13]. Recently, Cu(In, Ga)Se2 (CIGS) thin films have become considered one of the most prominent candidates for NIR photoactive layers [14,15,16].
Polycrystalline copper-indium-gallium-selenide (CIGS) thin films exhibit very promising properties such as competitive stability, a high absorption coefficient of ~105 cm−1 (two orders of magnitude higher than that of Si), and an adjustable direct energy bandgap (1.04–1.67 eV) [17,18]. CIGS has gained a reputation as a highly efficient thin film solar cell. The CIGS solar cells have reached a power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 23.35% at laboratory scale [19]. The performance improvement in CIGS solar cells has proven the potential utilization of CIGS thin films for NIR photodetectors. The CIGS thin films can be deposited on top of various substrates such as glass, polyimide, stainless steel, and silicon (Si) so that a CIGS thin film can be utilized to realize NIR photodetectors on various material platforms. Because little research has been reported regarding CIGS as photodetectors, more effort is needed to meet the requirement of the cut-off wavelength needed for operating in the NIR region [20,21,22].
In the work reported in this paper, copper-indium-selenide (CuInSe2, CISe) thin films were investigated as NIR photoactive layers. To achieve high PCE with CIGS, Ga content is added to the CISe thin film to form Ga grading. As the Ga content increases, the bandgap of CIGS increases and shows tunable bandgap characteristics [23,24]. The CIGS thin film optimized for photovoltaic applications contains 8.5% of Ga. When this amount of Ga is incorporated into a CIGS thin film, its cut-off wavelength is limited to 1059.9 nm. To extend the pho-detection capability to the longer wavelength, CISe thin film without Ga is interesting. Therefore, we aimed to fabricate CISe thin film with a bandgap near 0.95 eV. A structure of Al/Ni/aluminum-doped ZnO/i-ZnO/CdS/CISe/Mo was grown on a soda-lime-glass (SLG) substrate to realize a CISe-based photodetector able to detect optical wavelengths longer than 1100 nm. The bandgap energies of the CISe thin films were tuned by varying the Cu/In ratio. The device performance of these CISe-based photodetectors was investigated via the morphological and optical properties of the CISe thin films.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Fabrication of CISe Thin Film Photodetectors

CISe thin film photodetectors were fabricated on top of an SLG substrate. The SLG substrates were cleaned to remove organic contamination using acetic acid and deionized water prior to depositing the back contact layer. Molybdenum with a thickness of 1.0 μm was sputtered on SLG as a back contact layer with sputtering power of 300 W under low Ar pressure of 2 mTorr. The CISe layer was deposited using a three-stage co-evaporation process, which is shown in Figure 1a. The In2Se3 precursor layer was deposited during the first stage with a substrate temperature of 350 °C, followed by Cu and Se evaporation during the second stage with a substrate temperature of 550 °C. In the third stage, In and Se were co-deposited. Then the films were cooled within a flux of Se until the substrate temperature dropped to 350 °C. The 60 nm-thick CdS layer was subsequently deposited using a chemical bath deposition method. After RF magnetron sputtering of a transparent conducted oxide (TCO) layer consisting of a 70 nm thick i-ZnO layer and a 350 nm thick aluminum-doped ZnO layer (ZnO), a metal electrode consisting of a 50 nm thick Ni adhesion layer and 1 µm thick aluminum was deposited by e-beam evaporation to complete fabrication of the CISe based photodetectors. The 65 nm thick magnesium fluoride (MgF2) thin film was used for the antireflection coating to minimize the surface reflection. Schematic designs of the CISe thin film photodetectors are shown in Figure 1b. The diameter of the exposed area of the CISe-based photodetectors was 2 mm.
The surface morphology of the synthesized CISe layers was characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, S-4700, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). For crystallographic analysis, X-ray diffraction patterns were recorded using an X-ray diffractometer (XRD, X’Pert PRO, Malvern Panalytical, Malvern, UK) with a Cu target (1.5406 Å) and a 1.4 kW power X-ray generator. The Raman Spectra of CISe layers were obtained using a Raman spectroscopy system (LabRam HR800, Horiba Jobin-Yvon, Bensheim, Germany) equipped with a 512 nm and 325 nm excitation laser operated at room temperature. The topographical study was performed using atomic force microscopy (AFM, XE-100, Park Systems, Suwon, South Korea) in non-contact mode with a PPP-NCHR tip (Si). Its force constant and scanning rates were 42 N/m and 0.3 Hz, respectively. The overall Cu/In composition ratio of the CuInSe thin films were confirmed by X-ray fluorescence measurements (XRF, X-Strata980, Malvern Panalytical, Malvern, UK). The refractive index and extinction coefficient of the CISe layer was measured using an Ellipsometer (Elli-SE, Ellipso Technology, Suwon, South Korea). External quantum efficiency (EQE) was measured using an incident photon-to-electron conversion efficiency measurement system (QEX7 series, PV Measurements Inc., Boulder, CO, USA) under a 75 W xenon lamp light source (UXL-75XE, Ushio, Tokyo, Japan). The wavelength of the laser diode used for optical illumination was 1064 nm. The incident optical power was measured using an optical power sensor (1930F-IG, Newport, Irvine, CA, USA). The nominal spot size of the illuminated light that passed through the fiber was <9 µm. Dark current and photocurrent were measured using a semiconductor parameter analyzer (HP 4155A, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA).

2.2. Measurement Details

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. CuInSe2 Thin Film with Low Bandgap

A CIGS-based photodetector with a wider spectral range extending into the NIR region could be a candidate for an NIR photodetector. For higher sensitivity in the NIR region, a high-quality photodetector operating in the NIR region using low-bandgap CISe thin film must be realized. The bandgap of CIGS (1.04–1.67 eV) is still too high for use in the NIR region. To achieve a bandgap of about 0.95 eV with a cut-off wavelength of 1305 nm, CISe thin films were grown by the full three-stage process with different durations for the second stage. CISe thin films with Cu/In composition ratios of 1.27 to 0.87 were fabricated.
Figure 2 shows top-view SEM images of CISe thin films grown on the Mo/SLG. The surfaces of CISe films with Cu/In ratios of 0.87 to 0.95 exhibit sharp polyhedral-shaped morphology. The well-faceted polyhedral-shaped grains imply that CISe thin film has a chalcopyrite phase. The grain sizes of CISe films increase as the Cu content increases. For the Cu/In ratios of 0.87 and 0.95, the approximate grain sizes were determined to be about 0.59 and 1.26 µm, respectively. In the Cu-rich state, where the Cu/In ratios are 1.27 and 1.11, the grains exhibited particle-like shapes, and their sizes were 0.91 and 1.14 µm, respectively. The particle-like shapes are ascribed to a large amount of Cu-Se compounds.
Figure 3a shows the Raman spectra for the CISe layers. The CISe layers with Cu/In ratios of 1.27 and 1.11 exhibit the A1 mode of the Cu-Se compound, which means an excess amount of Cu. As the Cu/In ratio decreased, the E mode of CISe increased. The highest intensity of A1 mode of CISe (with a Cu/In ratio of 1.27) could be due to the effect of the Cu-Se compound. The XRD patterns in Figure 3b indicate that all of the CISe films have a chalcopyrite crystal structure with a preferred orientation of (112). Even the XRD patterns of all samples did not show an apparent intensity difference. The CISe thin film with Cu/In ratio of 0.95 was expected to have the highest crystallinity from the Raman spectra results.
The refractive index (n) and extinction coefficient (k) values were measured using an ellipsometer. The measured n and k values are shown in Figure 4a. The refractive index and extinction coefficient of CISe layers increased as the Cu/In ratio decreased, which suggests that the bandgap of CISe thin film decreased as the Cu/In ratio decreased. The wavelength-dependent absorption coefficients of the CISe layers were extracted from the extinction coefficients. As shown in Figure 4b, the absorption coefficient increased with the decreasing Cu/In ratio.

3.2. CuInSe2-Based Photodetectors

CISe layers with Cu/In ratios of 0.87, 0.93, 0.94, and 1.02 were utilized to fabricate the photodetectors. The Cu-rich CISe layers, with Cu/In ratios of 1.27 and 1.11, exhibited a Cu-Se compound-related high-defect density on their surfaces, which implies that they are unsuitable for device applications.
The external quantum efficiency (EQE) curves of the CISe thin-film photodetectors with various Cu/In ratios are compared in Figure 5a. The cut-off wavelengths were extracted by extrapolating the EQE curves as shown in the inset of Figure 5a and were utilized to calculate bandgap energies. The bandgap energies of the CISe thin films were tuned by varying the Cu/In ratio from 0.87 to 1.02. As the Cu/In ratio decreased, the bandgap energy decreased, which indicates that an increased cut-off wavelength was realized. The longest cut-off wavelength (1309 nm) was obtained from the CISe thin film having the Cu/In ratio of 0.87. Figure 5b shows the bias current–voltage (I–V) characteristics of the CISe thin-film photodetector in the dark and under 1064 nm laser illumination whose power ranged from 0.83 to 2.33 mW. The CISe-based photodetector with the Cu/In ratio of 0.93 exhibited the dark current density of 28.82 mA/cm2 and the differential resistance of 13.24 kΩ at −0.4 V. The low differential resistance is due to the large shunt leakage current. The dark current and responsivity values of the CISe-based photodetector were compared with those of the previously reported CIGS-based photodetectors in Table 1. Further material growth optimization is required to reduce the dark current and to enhance the differential resistance of the CISe-based photodetectors. In the forward biased condition, the current was almost constant, exhibiting the photovoltaic mode of the device. In the reverse biased condition, the current increased gradually with increasing laser power densities up to 2.33 mW, exhibiting a linear response. This current linear response dependency on the incident optical power is favorable for the photodetectors. The responsivity of the CISe thin-film photodetector was 0.52 and 0.60 A/W at 0 V and −0.4 V, respectively.

4. Conclusions

Low bandgap CISe thin-film photodetectors for operating in NIR were demonstrated. Low bandgap CISe thin films were grown to improve the photo-absorption properties in the NIR using a three-stage co-evaporation process. The bandgap energies of the CISe thin films were tuned by varying the Cu/In ratio from 1.02 to 0.87. When the bandgap wavelengths of CISe thin films were extracted from the external quantum efficiency of the photodetectors, the wavelengths increased as the Cu/In ratio decreased. The longest cut-off wavelength of 1300 nm was obtained from the CISe thin film having the Cu/In ratio of 0.87. The responsivity of the photodiode was measured under the illumination of a 1064 nm laser light. The photocurrent of the photodetector showed linear dependence on an optical power intensity up to 2.33 mW optical illumination and responsivity of 0.60 A/W under −0.4 V. This work shows that a CISe-based photodetector could be a prominent candidate for a photodetector operating in NIR.

Author Contributions

S.-T.K.: conceptualization, formal analysis, investigation, writing of original draft. J.-S.Y.: methodology, M.-W.L.: investigation, J.-W.J.: methodology, investigation. J.-H.J.: writing, review, and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was carried out at GIST with support by the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) and the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE) of the Republic of Korea (No. 20183010014310). It was also supported by a GIST Research Institute (GRI) grant funded by GIST in 2021, and a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning) (No. 2017R1A2B3004049).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lee, W.Y.; Ha, S.; Lee, H.; Bae, J.H.; Jang, B.; Kwon, H.J.; Yun, Y.; Lee, S.; Jang, J. High-Detectivity Flexible Near-Infrared Photodetector Based on Chalcogenide Ag2Se Nanoparticles. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2019, 7, 190812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sargent, E.H. Infrared quantum dots. Adv. Mater. 2005, 17, 515–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Liu, Z.; Tao, L.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, G.; Zhu, H.; Fang, Y.; Wu, G.; Yang, D.; Chen, H. Narrowband Near-Infrared Photodetector Enabled by Dual Functional Internal-Filter-Induced Selective Charge Collection. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2021, 9, 2100288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Surdo, S.; Carpignano, F.; Merlo, S.; Barillaro, G. Near-Infrared Silicon Photonic Crystals with High-Order Photonic Bandgaps for High-Sensitivity Chemical Analysis of Water-Ethanol Mixtures. ACS Sens. 2018, 3, 2223–2231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Miao, J.; Zhang, F. Recent progress on highly sensitive perovskite photodetectors. J. Mater. Chem. C 2019, 7, 1741–1791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sargent, E.H. Solar cells, photodetectors, and optical sources from infrared colloidal quantum dots. Adv. Mater. 2008, 20, 3958–3964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Liu, C.; Guo, J.; Yu, L.; Li, J.; Zhang, M.; Li, H.; Shi, Y.; Dai, D. Silicon/2D-material photodetectors: From near-infrared to mid-infrared. Light Sci. Appl. 2021, 10, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Huang, Z.; Carey, J.E.; Liu, M.; Guo, X.; Mazur, E.; Campbell, J.C. Microstructured silicon photodetector. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 89, 14–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Son, B.; Lin, Y.; Lee, K.H.; Chen, Q.; Tan, C.S. Dark current analysis of germanium-on-insulator vertical p-i-n photodetectors with varying threading dislocation density. J. Appl. Phys. 2020, 127, 203105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gonzalez, M.B.; Simoen, E.; Eneman, G.; De Jaeger, B.; Wang, G.; Loo, R.; Claeys, C. Defect assessment and leakage control in Ge junctions. Microelectron. Eng. 2014, 125, 33–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Son, B.; Lin, Y.; Lee, K.H.; Wang, Y.; Wu, S.; Tan, C.S. High speed and ultra-low dark current Ge vertical p-i-n photodetectors on an oxygen-annealed Ge-on-insulator platform with GeO x surface passivation. Opt. Express 2020, 28, 23978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lapierre, R.R.; Robson, M.; Azizur-Rahman, K.M.; Kuyanov, P. A review of III-V nanowire infrared photodetectors and sensors. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2017, 50, 123001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Verdun, M.; Beaudoin, G.; Portier, B.; Bardou, N.; Dupuis, C.; Sagnes, I.; Haïdar, R.; Pardo, F.; Pelouard, J.L. Dark current investigation in thin P-i-N InGaAs photodiodes for nano-resonators. J. Appl. Phys. 2016, 120, 084501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Kim, J.H.; Han, H.; Kim, M.K.; Ahn, J.; Hwang, D.K.; Shin, T.J.; Min, B.K.; Lim, J.A. Solution-processed near-infrared Cu(In,Ga)(S,Se)2 photodetectors with enhanced chalcopyrite crystallization and bandgap grading structure via potassium incorporation. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 7820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Yuan, Y.; Zhang, L.; Yan, G.; Cen, G.; Liu, Y.; Zeng, L.; Zeng, C.; Zhao, C.; Hong, R.; Mai, W. Significantly Enhanced Detectivity of CIGS Broadband High-Speed Photodetectors by Grain Size Control and ALD-Al2O3 Interfacial-Layer Modification. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 20157–20166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Qiao, S.; Liu, J.; Niu, X.; Liang, B.; Fu, G.; Li, Z.; Wang, S.; Ren, K.; Pan, C. Piezophototronic Effect Enhanced Photoresponse of the Flexible Cu(In,Ga)Se2 (CIGS) Heterojunction Photodetectors. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1707311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chirilǎ, A.; Buecheler, S.; Pianezzi, F.; Bloesch, P.; Gretener, C.; Uhl, A.R.; Fella, C.; Kranz, L.; Perrenoud, J.; Seyrling, S.; et al. Highly efficient Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells grown on flexible polymer films. Nat. Mater. 2011, 10, 857–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Ramanujam, J.; Singh, U.P. Copper indium gallium selenide based solar cells—A review. Energy Environ. Sci. 2017, 10, 1306–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nakamura, M.; Yamaguchi, K.; Kimoto, Y.; Yasaki, Y.; Kato, T.; Sugimoto, H. Cd-Free Cu(In,Ga)(Se,S)2 Thin-Film Solar Cell With Record Efficiency of 23.35 %. IEEE J. Photovolt. 2019, 9, 1863–1867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Aldemir, D.A.; Kaleli, M.; Yavru, A.C. Electrical and photoelectric properties of Yb/CIGS thin film Schottky photodiode. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2020, 311, 112091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zeng, X.; Lontchi, J.; Zhukova, M.; Fourdrinier, L.; Qadir, I.; Ren, Y.; Niemi, E.; Li, G.; Flandre, D. High-responsivity broadband photodetection of an ultra-thin In2S3/CIGS heterojunction on steel. Opt. Lett. 2021, 46, 2288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Qiao, S.; Feng, K.; Li, Z.; Fu, G.; Wang, S. Ultrahigh, ultrafast and large response size visible-near-infrared optical position sensitive detectors based on CIGS structures. J. Mater. Chem. C 2017, 5, 4915–4922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gong, J.; Kong, Y.; Li, J.; Wang, K.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Z.; Ding, Z.; Xiao, X. Enhancing photocurrent of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells with actively controlled Ga grading in the absorber layer. Nano Energy 2019, 62, 205–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Colombara, D.; Werner, F.; Schwarz, T.; Cañero Infante, I.; Fleming, Y.; Valle, N.; Spindler, C.; Vacchieri, E.; Rey, G.; Guennou, M.; et al. Sodium enhances indium-gallium interdiffusion in copper indium gallium diselenide photovoltaic absorbers. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Kikuchi, K.; Imura, S.; Miyakawa, K.; Ohtake, H.; Kubota, M.; Ohta, E. Photocurrent multiplication in Ga2O3/CuInGaSe2 heterojunction photosensors. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2015, 224, 24–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Schematic of the three-stage co-evaporation process. (b) Schematic designing of CISe-based photodetectors.
Figure 1. (a) Schematic of the three-stage co-evaporation process. (b) Schematic designing of CISe-based photodetectors.
Applsci 12 00092 g001
Figure 2. SEM images of CISe thin films with Cu/In ratios of (a) 1.27, (b) 1.11, (c) 0.95, and (d) 0.87.
Figure 2. SEM images of CISe thin films with Cu/In ratios of (a) 1.27, (b) 1.11, (c) 0.95, and (d) 0.87.
Applsci 12 00092 g002
Figure 3. (a) Raman spectra and (b) XRD patterns of the CISe thin films with different Cu/In ratios.
Figure 3. (a) Raman spectra and (b) XRD patterns of the CISe thin films with different Cu/In ratios.
Applsci 12 00092 g003
Figure 4. (a) Refractive index, n, extinction coefficient, k, (b) the absorption coefficients of the CISe layers with variable Cu/In ratios.
Figure 4. (a) Refractive index, n, extinction coefficient, k, (b) the absorption coefficients of the CISe layers with variable Cu/In ratios.
Applsci 12 00092 g004
Figure 5. (a) External quantum efficiency (EQE) curves of the CISe photodetectors measured at the bias voltage of −0.4 V. The inset figure shows the method to estimate the cut-off wavelength (λc) from the EQE curve. (b) Current–voltage characteristics of the photodetectors with the Cu/In ratio of 0.93 measured under 1064 nm wavelength.
Figure 5. (a) External quantum efficiency (EQE) curves of the CISe photodetectors measured at the bias voltage of −0.4 V. The inset figure shows the method to estimate the cut-off wavelength (λc) from the EQE curve. (b) Current–voltage characteristics of the photodetectors with the Cu/In ratio of 0.93 measured under 1064 nm wavelength.
Applsci 12 00092 g005
Table 1. Comparison of dark current values of CIGS and CISe-based photodetectors reported in previous literature.
Table 1. Comparison of dark current values of CIGS and CISe-based photodetectors reported in previous literature.
Device StructureDark CurrentResponsivity (A/W)References
Solution-processed CIGS0.3 mA/cm2 @ −0.4 V0.34 @ 980 nm, 1mW/cm2[14]
ZnO/CdS/Al2O3/CIGS22.2 nA/cm2 @ 0 V0.54 @ 880 nm[15]
Ga2O3/CIGS1 nA/cm2 @ 0 V[25]
CISe28.82 mA/cm2 @ −0.4 V0.6 @ 1064 nmThis work
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, S.-T.; Yoo, J.-S.; Lee, M.-W.; Jung, J.-W.; Jang, J.-H. CuInSe2-Based Near-Infrared Photodetector. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 92. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12010092

AMA Style

Kim S-T, Yoo J-S, Lee M-W, Jung J-W, Jang J-H. CuInSe2-Based Near-Infrared Photodetector. Applied Sciences. 2022; 12(1):92. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12010092

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Sung-Tae, Ji-Seon Yoo, Min-Woo Lee, Ji-Won Jung, and Jae-Hyung Jang. 2022. "CuInSe2-Based Near-Infrared Photodetector" Applied Sciences 12, no. 1: 92. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12010092

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop