Next Article in Journal
An Energy-Efficient Strategy for Microcontrollers
Next Article in Special Issue
Salicornia ramosissima Bioactive Composition and Safety: Eco-Friendly Extractions Approach (Microwave-Assisted Extraction vs. Conventional Maceration)
Previous Article in Journal
Failure Mechanism of Back-Break in Bench Blasting of Thin Terrane
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Empirical Kinetic Modelling and Mechanisms of Quercetin Thermal Degradation in Aqueous Model Systems: Effect of pH and Addition of Antioxidants

by
Abdessamie Kellil
1,
Spyros Grigorakis
1,
Sofia Loupassaki
1 and
Dimitris P. Makris
2,*
1
Food Quality & Chemistry of Natural Products, Mediterranean Agronomic Institute of Chania (M.A.I.Ch.), International Centre for Advanced Mediterranean Agronomic Studies (CIHEAM), P.O. Box 85, 73100 Chania, Greece
2
Department of Food Science & Nutrition, School of Agricultural Sciences, University of Thessaly, N. Temponera Street, 43100 Karditsa, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(6), 2579; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11062579
Submission received: 17 February 2021 / Revised: 9 March 2021 / Accepted: 11 March 2021 / Published: 14 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioactive Molecules in Food)

Abstract

:
Quercetin (Qt) is a natural flavonoid of high biological significance, and it occurs in a wide variety of plant foods. Although its oxidation by various means has been extensively studied, its behavior with regard to thermal treatments remains a challenge. The study described herein aimed at investigating Qt thermal decomposition, by proposing an empirical sigmoidal model for tracing degradation kinetics. This model was employed to examine the effect of addition of antioxidants on Qt thermal degradation, including ascorbic acid, L-cysteine, and sulfite. Furthermore, degradation pathways were proposed by performing liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analyses. Upon addition of any antioxidant used, the sigmoidal course of Qt thermal degradation was pronounced, evidencing the validity of the empirical model used in the study of similar cases. The antioxidants retarded Qt degradation in a manner that appeared to depend on Qt/antioxidant molar ratio. No major differentiation in the degradation mechanism was observed in response to the addition of various antioxidants, and in all cases protocatechuic acid and phloroglucinol carboxylic acid were typical degradation products identified. Furthermore, in all cases tested the solutions resulted after thermal treatment possessed inferior antioxidant properties compared to the initial Qt solutions, and this demonstrated the detrimental effects of heating on Qt. The empirical model proposed could be of assistance in interpreting the degradation behavior of other polyphenols, but its validity merits further investigation.

1. Introduction

Polyphenols are ubiquitous plant secondary metabolites, and they are undisputedly a highly significant field of interest in human nutrition. A growing body of research over the last two decades suggests that polyphenol intake through consumption of plant foods may play a vital role in maintaining a good health status, by regulating metabolism, battling chronic degenerative diseases, and controlling cell proliferation. To date, accumulated epidemiological evidence indicates that various polyphenols may exhibit strong antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, which could be implicated in the prevention of cardiovascular disease, neurodegenerative disorders, cancer, etc. [1].
Amongst several polyphenol classes, flavonols are probably one of the most prominent ones, because they are abundant at significant amounts in many commonly consumed fruit and vegetables, but also in foods of plant origin, such as fruit juices, tea and wine [2]. The major flavonol representative is quercetin, which occurs in plant tissues mainly as glycoside, although various types of processing may result in glycoside decomposition, releasing the aglycone [3]. Quercetin has powerful antioxidant properties, and its biological significance has been appraised by numerous investigations [4,5]. On the other hand, quercetin is a molecule susceptible to chemical and enzymic attacks, which may result in decomposition, skeleton rearrangement, and dimerization [6]. Such modifications can inevitably lead to alteration of the biological properties of quercetin, but this does not necessarily entail loss of biological activity. Decomposition or oxidation may end up in obtaining products of inferior antioxidant potency [7], but quercetin and other structurally related flavonoids were also shown to retain antioxidant activity, despite chemical or enzymic oxidation [8,9]. Quercetin oxidation may also result in generating compounds with enhanced biological activity [10]. Therefore, the changes in quercetin structure brought about through oxidative modification should be a subject of thorough appraisal.
The issue of food thermal processing on flavonols has been long before addressed, on the basis of findings which indicated that regular domestic practices (frying, boiling) could have an important impact on flavonol content and composition of certain plant tissues [11]. Latter studies confirmed that onion boiling may provoke notable decreases in flavonol glycosides and antioxidant activity, the extent of which was linked to glycoside structure [12]. More recent studies were in concurrence, highlighting the importance of domestic processing (frying, baking, steaming) on onion flavonol glycosides and its nutritional consequences [13]. Polyphenol thermal degradation has also been observed in black rice flour [14] and apple juice [15] thermal processing. However, other investigations suggested that the changes traced for flavonols in processed foods may depend on the mode of processing, yielding either increased or decreased flavonol content [16]. Indeed, it has been supported that heat treatments may contribute to increasing polyphenolic content in vegetables, as a result of thermal destruction of cell walls and sub cellular compartments during the cooking process, which would allow for polyphenol release [17].
Considering the above concepts, the current study aimed at assessing the effect of thermal treatment on quercetin degradation in model solutions. The phenomenon was approached by implementing a novel kinetic model, through which the effects of pH and addition of antioxidants were evaluated. The elucidation of quercetin degradation mechanism was carried out with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), and putative consequences on the antioxidant activity were discussed on the ground of the results from representative in vitro assays. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, such a kinetic approach is, for the first time, proposed for the study of polyphenol thermal degradation.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

Potassium phosphate dibasic trihydrate (≥99%), L-ascorbic acid, 2,2-diphenylpicrylhydrazyl (DPPH), sodium sulfite (>98%), 2,4,6-tris(2-pyridyl)-s-triazine (TPTZ), quercetin dihydrate (>95%), 3,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid (protocatechuic acid), 2,4,6-trihydroxybenzoic acid (phloroglucinol carboxylic acid), and citric acid were from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). L-Cysteine was from BioChemica AppliChem (Darmstadt, Germany). Trolox™ was from Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany). Iron(III) chloride hexahydrate was from Honeywell-Fluka (Harvey St, Muskegon, MI, USA). Quercetin stock solution with concentration of 20 mM was prepared in acetone and stored at −17 °C. Stock solution of L-ascorbic acid (5 mM), L-cysteine (5 mM), and sodium sulfite (5 mM mM) were prepared exactly before used in double-distilled water. Solvents used for liquid chromatography were of HPLC grade.

2.2. Model Solutions and Thermal Treatment

A volume of 50 mL of citrate-phosphate dibasic buffer, adjusted at pH 6.5, 7.0, and 7.5, was placed in 100-mL dark glass vial and heated up at 90 °C, by means of an oil bath, placed on a hotplate (VELP Scientifica, Bohemia, NY, USA). The solution was then set under stirring, at 400 rpm, and spiked with appropriate volume of quercetin stock solution, to give a final concentration of 100 μmol L−1. To test the effect of L-ascorbic acid, sodium sulfite, and L-cysteine, Qt solutions were also spiked with suitable volumes of stock solutions of these compounds, to provide the desired concentration.

2.3. Degradation Kinetics

To trace kinetics, sampling was accomplished at predetermined intervals by withdrawing 0.5 mL of model solution. This aliquot was then mixed with 0.5 mL methanol containing 2% HCl and absorbance readings were obtained in a double-beam JASCO V-530 UV/Vis spectrophotometer (Tokyo, Japan). For monitoring quercetin degradation, absorbance was measured at wavelength corresponding to λmax of the Band I of the flavonol skeleton [18]. The λmax was determined by obtaining Qt UV–VIS spectrum within the range 200–600 nm, in a 50% aqueous methanol containing 1% HCl. A calibration curve was constructed by measuring the absorbance at λmax and plotting it against concentration (5–50 μmol L−1).

2.4. Antioxidant Activity

To assess the antioxidant activity of the model systems, two complementary tests were performed, the antiradical activity (AAR) and the ferric-reducing power (PR) [19]. Results for AAR and PR were expressed as mmol Trolox equivalents (TRE) and μM ascorbic acid equivalents (AAE), respectively.

2.5. Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC/MS/MS)

The equipment used was a chromatograph TSQ Quantum Access LC/MS/MS, a surveyor pump (Thermo Scientific, Walltham, MA, USA), interfaced by XCalibur 2.1, TSQ 2.1 software. Chromatography was carried out on a Superspher RP-18 column, 125 mm × 2 mm, 4 μm, at 40 °C, with 10 μL injection volume and a flow rate of 0.3 mL min−1. Eluent (A) was 1% aqueous acetic acid and eluent (B) methanol containing 1% acetic acid. The elution program was a linear gradient, as follows: 0 min, 5% B; 35 min, 100% B. Mass spectra were acquired in negative ionization mode, after performing a full scan within 100–700 amu (scan time = 1 s), using the following settings: auxiliary gas pressure, 15 mTorr; sheath gas pressure, 30 mTorr; collision pressure at 1.5 mTorr; capillary temperature, 300 °C.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Curve fitting for kinetic models, and all linear and non-linear regressions were performed with SigmaPlot™ 12.5 (Systat Software Inc., San Jose, CA, USA). Distribution analysis was performed with JMP™ Pro 13 (SAS, Cary, NC, USA). Determinations were carried out in triplicate and the values reported are average (±standard deviation).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. The Effect of pH

The thermal degradation of Qt at 90 °C was first assessed as a function of pH near neutrality, that is, within the range 6.5–7.5. The evolution of the decrease of Qt concentration, C (μmol L−1), was plotted against time, t (s), and at all three pH values tested (6.5, 7.0, and 7.5) it was observed that the curve obtained had a sigmoid trend (Figure 1). Therefore, a sigmoidal model was implemented, as follows:
C t =   C 0 1 +   e ( t   t 1 / 2 b )
where C0 and Ct are the initial molar Qt concentration and the concentration at any time, t, respectively, t1/2 is the half-life of the degradation reaction (s), and 1 b the apparent first-order degradation rate, k (s−1). The examination was also carried out using first-order kinetics (Figure 2), as follows:
ln ( C t C 0 ) =   k t
The decline in absorbance is virtually stabilized after some time, which actually signified the end of the reaction within the time limits initially set. These points do not contribute in tracing kinetic curves, and they were, therefore, excluded from the linear representation in Figure 1.
As can be seen in Table 1, the implementation of the sigmoidal model exhibited higher R2, which indicated a better fitting to the experimental data compared to first-order model. However, for both sigmoidal and first-order models, the statistical significance was higher than 95% (p < 0.05).
Determination of degradation rate constants, k, and degradation half-lives, t1/2, revealed important discrepancies between models (Table 1). In particular, k determined that the sigmoidal model were 2.3 to 2.5 higher than those determined with the first-order model. However, for pH 7.5, t1/2 determined with the sigmoidal model was 1.55-times higher than that determined with the first-order model. This finding pointed to an underestimation of the degradation rate constant, when the first-order model was used, but also to a different relationship between k and t1/2 in the sigmoidal model, as implied by Equation (1). At this point, the issue that arises is the reason for which the sigmoidal model, which rather traces Qt degradation more accurately, delivers higher k. The monitoring of Qt degradation is carried out by recording the decrease in λmax (370 nm). Yet, decrease of absorbance at 370 nm occurs not when Qt starts to break down into simpler phenolics, but as soon as Qt is converted into the initial oxidation product, which is its quinone (Figure 3) [20].
Should this be the case, then initially, decrease in λmax might be slower. This is because Qt quinone exhibits a λmax at around 425–430 nm [21] and, thus, it may possess notable absorbance at 370 nm, which would affect monitoring of Qt disappearance. First-order kinetics fails to incorporate this stage, and the points included in tracing Qt degradation are those corresponding to rapid Qt disappearance, which takes place during quinone decomposition. Cleavage of the Qt quinone skeleton would lead to decreases at 370 nm, yielding degradation products (simpler phenolics) that possess practically no absorbance at this region of the spectrum [22]. This is most probably the rationale behind the differences observed when kinetic parameters were determined with the sigmoidal model instead of the first-order model.
The determination of k with either model demonstrated an approximate 5-fold increase from pH 6.5 to 7.5, illustrating the effect of pH. Although information on thermal degradation kinetics of quercetin at 95 °C was previously provided to some extent [23], no data regarding the effect of pH at similar temperatures have been reported. Early examinations demonstrated the dependence of quercetin oxidative degradation on pH within the range 4–7, suggesting a logarithmic increase in first-order kinetics constant as a function of pH, at 50 °C [24]. In the same line, more recent studies showed an increase in first-order decomposition of quercetin as pH increased from 6.0 to 7.5 [25]. It was proposed that quercetin deprotonation at alkaline pH accelerates its oxidation, affecting the C-ring and the o-diphenol structure of the B-ring, and leading to the formation of a benzofuranone derivative [26,27].
The LC-MS/MS analysis of a Qt solution after treatment at 90 °C for 50 min (Figure 4) enabled the tentative identification of typical degradation products, including protocatechuic acid (PCA) and phloroglucinol carboxylic acid (PGCA) (Table 2; Figure 3).
Identification of both PCA and PGCA was based on mass spectral data previously reported [28]. Qt quinone was also detected, which confirmed its formation as an intermediate in Qt degradation. The typical oxidation product 2-(hydroxybenzoyl)-2-hydroxybenzofuran-3(2H)-one (benzofuranone), which may arise as a result of Qt oxidation by various means [28], was not detected. This fact might be attributed to the relatively high temperature of the treatment, which most probably triggered benzofuranone thermal decomposition. On the other hand, alternative oxidation pathways might have taken place as previously proposed [18,29], resulting in PCA and PGCA formation. It should be noted that Qt oxidation in the absence of H2O2 did not yield PCA and PGCA [30,31]. Therefore, the degradation pathway(s) involved would be likely to include formation of H2O2 too, as intermediate. This could arise through reaction of O2 with 2H atoms offered by Qt, hence the formation of Qt quinone. Such a reaction would be facilitated at the mildly alkaline pH used (7.5). Then H2O2 nucleophilic attack at the C2 position would lead to cross ring cyclic peroxylation, resulting an intermediate depside. Decomposition of this depside would eventually yield PCA and PGCA [31]. Such a reaction would also be feasible through radical formation, as previously suggested [29].

3.2. The Effect of AsA Addition

To test the effect of AsA, increasing AsA amounts varying from 10 to 200 μmol L−1 were added into Qt solutions, to provide a Qt/AsA molar ratio range from 10 to 0.5. In this case, the sigmoidal course of degradation was more evident as AsA concentration increased (Figure 5). Although AsA at levels of 10 and 25 μmol L−1 resulted in lower k, an increasing trend observed for k, from 10 and up to 100 μmol L−1 AsA (Table 3). However, the differences in k compared to control treatment (no AsA addition) were about 14%, at most. On the other hand, t1/2 displayed a consistent increasing tendency within the whole range of AsA concentrations tested. This outcome suggested that the effect of AsA on k was dependent on Qt/AsA molar ratio, but a rise in AsA concentration up to a Qt/AsA molar ration of 0.5 provided a proportional Qt stability, as implied by the increased t1/2.
Such a phenomenon could be attributed to a stabilizing effect on Qt quinone, or, if Qt radical formation has preceded, donation of a H atom to convert Qt radical back to Qt. The latter would prevent O2-mediated oxidation of Qt, which would further decompose into simpler phenolics [29]. The fact that Qt was oxidized first could be supported by its lower oxidation potential, compared to AsA [32,33].
Therefore, it would be likely that, in a mixture of AsA and Qt, the latter is preferably oxidized, giving rise to Qt radicals and/or Qt quinone. Then, AsA might scavenge O2 (and/or H2O2), delaying to some extent further Qt oxidation and decomposition. This is likely the reason for determining increasing t1/2 upon addition of increasing AsA concentration.
Upon depletion of AsA, Qt would react with O2 (or H2O2) generating eventually PCA and PGCA. To verify whether the presence of AsA could alter the mechanism of Qt decomposition, the mixture of Qt treated in the presence of 200 μmol L−1 AsA for 50 min, at 90 °C, was analyzed by LC-MS/MS. Once again, as in the case of Qt alone, the major compounds detected were PCA and PGCA, but also another one with m/z = 179. The latter was tentatively assigned to 3,4-dione-2-oxo-phenylacetic acid (Figure 3), and it could derive from decomposition of 2,3,4-chalcan-trione o-quinone, as previously proposed [31]. In such a case, formation of Qt quinone should precede and, therefore, it could be supported that, in the presence of AsA, Qt quinone formation and subsequent decomposition could be a plausible predominant pathway.

3.3. The Effect of CySH Addition

As in the case of AsA addition, the sigmoidal course of Qt decomposition was also pronounced by the addition of increasing amounts of CySH (Figure 6), compared to control, although less so compared to AsA. The addition of increasing amounts of CySH resulted in a consistently decreasing tendency in k, and when CySH was added at a level of 200 μmol L−1, Qt displayed the least k, which was by almost 43% lower compared to control (no CySH addition). On the other hand, t1/2 increased up to 50 μmol L−1 CySH, but then it exhibited a rather stabilizing trend (Table 3). Based on the hypothesis set out for AsA, it would appear that CySH stabilized Qt quinone by preventing quinone reaction with oxygen, or by acting as radical scavenger, up to 50 μmol L−1; additional increase in CySH had no or little effect. Stabilizing effect of CySH against thermally-induced, copper-catalyzed oxidative Qt degradation has been previously reported to occur at 1:1 molar ratio [34]. The authors attributed this protective action to the ability of CySH to react with oxygen, giving stable products, such as L-cystine, L-cysteine sulphinic acid, and L-cysteine sulphonic acid. On the other hand, under different conditions, CySH might accelerate Qt degradation through the involvement of cysteinyl radicals [18]. However, given the stabilizing effect observed, the latter case would be rather unlikely.
The chromatographic profile of a Qt mixture with 200 μmol L−1 CySH, after 50 min of treatment at 90 °C, did not show any difference compared to that of Qt alone, and the major products detected were PCA, PGCA, and Qt quinone (Table 2). Unlike previous examinations [18,34], the appearance of peaks that would manifest Qt reaction with CySH was not evidenced. Such a finding would strongly point to a non-radical degradation mechanism, as also supported for Qt/AsA mixtures.

3.4. The Effect of Sulfite Addition

Similarly to what was observed by addition of either AsA or CySH, the sigmoidal course of Qt degradation was more evident by the addition of sodium sulfite (Figure 7). At a concentration of 10 μmol L−1, sulfite provoked a decrease in k by almost 15% compared to control (no sulfite addition), but at 25 μmol L−1 an increase was recorded (Table 3). Thereafter, k followed a constant decline, as in the case of CySH. Likewise, although t1/2 decreased up to 50 μmol L−1, from 100 to 200 μmol L−1 an increase was seen. This outcome indicated that sulfite showed a consistent stabilizing effect from 50 μmol L−1 onwards.
Sulfite may act as oxygen scavenger and reducing agent [35]. Therefore, the protective action it could exert would be through preventing reaction of Qt (or Qt quinone) with oxygen, or reduction of the Qt quinone back to Qt. Sulfur dioxide (SO2) has been proven to prevent Qt electrochemical oxidation [36], and the authors claimed that the antioxidant protection seen was a result of quinone reduction or semiquinone radical reduction. Judging by the degradation products generated, it was also concluded that Qt oxidative degradation follows the same pathway, irrespective of the presence of SO2. To test this hypothesis, as well as to shed more light onto the effect of sulfite on Qt oxidative degradation, a Qt solution treated for 50 min, at 90 °C, in the presence of 200 μmol L−1 sodium sulfite, was subjected to LC-MS/MS analysis. Apart from the typical degradation products PCA, PGCA and Qt quinone, two other peaks with m/z = 381 and 379 were also detected (Table 3). These compounds were encountered neither in Qt solutions, nor in Qt solutions treated with AsA and CySH. The peak with m/z = 381 might correspond to Qt 3-sulfate, as previously proposed [37,38], while the peak with m/z = 379 could be its quinone (Figure 3). This finding raised evidence for plausible reaction(s) between Qt and sulfite.

3.5. Impact on Antioxidant Activity

To test whether Qt decomposition could impact its antioxidant properties to a significant extent, a Qt solution of 100 μmol L−1 was assayed before and after treatment at pH 7.5 and 90 °C, for 50 min. As can be seen in Figure 8, both AAR and PR were significantly reduced after treatment (p < 0.05). This outcome clearly pointed to a detrimental effect of Qt thermal break down on its antioxidant potency. The examination of solutions with 200 μmol L−1 of either AsA, CySH and sulfite showed that AAR may be less affected, although the reduction was still significant compared to non-treated Qt solution. Regarding PR, the reduction was significant irrespective of the antioxidant added.
Qt is considered a powerful antioxidant, due to unique structural features, which are not encountered in other flavonoids, such as the combination of the o-diphenol in B-ring, the C2–C3 double bond, the 4-oxo group and the 5-hydroxyl group [39]. Once the skeleton is cleaved, these features are abrogated and thus it would be reasonable to anticipate reduced antioxidant activity. Furthermore, the two major degradation products, PCA and PGCA, have been proven to be of considerably lower efficiency [22]. AsA, CySH, and sulfite may also degrade and/or oxidize to some extent and apparently could not compensate for the antioxidant activity lost.

4. Conclusions

The thermal degradation of Qt in an aqueous model system, at pH 7.5, was shown to obey a sigmoidal curve, and on this ground a novel empirical kinetic model was proposed, to investigate the decomposition behavior of Qt. This sigmoidal trend was even more evident when Qt solutions were treated in the presence of compounds that express antioxidant effect, including AsA, CySH, and sulfite. In all cases it was found that addition of antioxidants may delay Qt thermal degradation, but this depended on the molar ratio Qt/antioxidant. Some reaction products between Qt and sulfite tentatively identified may also play a role in this regard. However, the typical degradation products detected were PCA and PGCA, irrespective of the antioxidant added. In any case, the solution resulted after thermal treatment possessed inferior antioxidant properties compared to the initial Qt solution, and this demonstrated the detrimental effects of heating on Qt. The kinetic model proposed should be considered strictly as empirical, and it may be of assistance in interpreting the degradation behavior of other polyphenols. Thus, testing of a wider range of structures could reveal its validity in assessing various factors (pH, antioxidants) in polyphenol thermal degradation, but also its limitations, which are yet to be defined.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: D.P.M.; methodology: D.P.M., S.G.; validation: A.K., S.G.; formal analysis: A.K., S.G., S.L.; data curation: D.P.M., S.G., A.K.; writing—original draft preparation: D.P.M.; visualization: D.P.M., S.G., A.K.; supervision: D.P.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Nomenclature

AARAntiradical activity (mmol TRE L−1)
C0Initial concentration of quercetin (μmol L−1)
CtConcentration of quercetin at time t (μmol L−1)
kQuercetin first-order degradation constant (s−1)
PRFerric-reducing power (μmol AAE L−1)
TTemperature (°C)
tTime (s)

References

  1. Cory, H.; Passarelli, S.; Szeto, J.; Tamez, M.; Mattei, J. The role of polyphenols in human health and food systems: A mini-review. Front. Nutr. 2018, 5, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Kamiloglu, S.; Tomas, M.; Capanoglu, E. Dietary Flavonols and O-Glycosides. In Handbook of Dietary Phytochemicals; Springer: Singapore, 2019; pp. 1–40. [Google Scholar]
  3. Deng, S.; West, B.J.; Jensen, C.J. Thermal degradation of flavonol glycosides in noni leaves during roasting. Adv. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 3, 155–159. [Google Scholar]
  4. Calani, L.; Dall’Asta, M.; Bruni, R.; Rio, D.D. Flavonoid occurrence, bioavailability, metabolism, and protective effects in humans: Focus on Flavan-3-ols and Flavonols. In Recent Advances in Polyphenol Research; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Chichester, UK, 2014; pp. 239–279. [Google Scholar]
  5. Wang, W.; Sun, C.; Mao, L.; Ma, P.; Liu, F.; Yang, J.; Gao, Y. The biological activities, chemical stability, metabolism and delivery systems of quercetin: A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 56, 21–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhou, A.; Sadik, O.A. Comparative analysis of quercetin oxidation by electrochemical, enzymatic, autoxidation, and free radical generation techniques: A mechanistic study. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 12081–12091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Buchner, N.; Krumbein, A.; Rohn, S.; Kroh, L.W. Effect of thermal processing on the flavonols rutin and quercetin. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2006, 20, 3229–3235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Atala, E.; Fuentes, J.; Wehrhahn, M.J.; Speisky, H. Quercetin and related flavonoids conserve their antioxidant properties despite undergoing chemical or enzymatic oxidation. Food Chem. 2017, 234, 479–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Chaaban, H.; Ioannou, I.; Chebil, L.; Slimane, M.; Gérardin, C.; Paris, C.; Charbonnel, C.; Chekir, L.; Ghoul, M. Effect of heat processing on thermal stability and antioxidant activity of six flavonoids. J. Food Proc. Preserv. 2017, 41, e13203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fuentes, J.; Atala, E.; Pastene, E.; Carrasco-Pozo, C.; Speisky, H.N. Quercetin oxidation paradoxically enhances its antioxidant and cytoprotective properties. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 11002–11010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Price, K.R.; Bacon, J.R.; Rhodes, M.J. Effect of storage and domestic processing on the content and composition of flavonol glucosides in onion (Allium cepa). J. Agric. Food Chem. 1997, 45, 938–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Makris, D.P.; Rossiter, J.T. Domestic processing of onion bulbs (Allium cepa) and asparagus spears (Asparagus officinalis): Effect on flavonol content and antioxidant status. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001, 49, 3216–3222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Harris, S.; Brunton, N.; Tiwari, U.; Cummins, E. Human exposure modelling of quercetin in onions (Allium cepa L.) following thermal processing. Food Chem. 2015, 187, 135–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bolea, C.; Turturică, M.; Stănciuc, N.; Vizireanu, C. Thermal degradation kinetics of bioactive compounds from black rice flour (Oryza sativa L.) extracts. J. Cereal Sci. 2016, 71, 160–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. De Paepe, D.; Valkenborg, D.; Coudijzer, K.; Noten, B.; Servaes, K.; De Loose, M.; Voorspoels, S.; Diels, L.; Van Droogenbroeck, B. Thermal degradation of cloudy apple juice phenolic constituents. Food Chem. 2014, 162, 176–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lombard, K.; Peffley, E.; Geoffriau, E.; Thompson, L.; Herring, A. Quercetin in onion (Allium cepa L.) after heat-treatment simulating home preparation. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2005, 18, 571–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Juániz, I.; Ludwig, I.A.; Huarte, E.; Pereira-Caro, G.; Moreno-Rojas, J.M.; Cid, C.; De Peña, M.-P. Influence of heat treatment on antioxidant capacity and (poly) phenolic compounds of selected vegetables. Food Chem. 2016, 197, 466–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Photiades, A.; Grigorakis, S.; Makris, D.P. Kinetics and modeling of L-cysteine effect on the Cu (II)-induced oxidation of quercetin. Chem. Eng. Commun. 2020, 207, 139–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Arnous, A.; Makris, D.P.; Kefalas, P. Correlation of pigment and flavanol content with antioxidant properties in selected aged regional wines from Greece. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2002, 15, 655–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hajji, H.E.; Nkhili, E.; Tomao, V.; Dangles, O. Interactions of quercetin with iron and copper ions: Complexation and autoxidation. Free Radic. Res. 2006, 40, 303–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dangles, O.; Fargeix, G.; Dufour, C. One-electron oxidation of quercetin and quercetin derivatives in protic and non protic media. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2 1999, 1, 1387–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Makris, D.P.; Rossiter, J.T. Comparison of quercetin and a non-orthohydroxy flavonol as antioxidants by competing in vitro oxidation reactions. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001, 49, 3370–3377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Makris, D.P.; Rossiter, J.T. Heat-induced, metal-catalyzed oxidative degradation of quercetin and rutin (quercetin 3-O-rhamnosylglucoside) in aqueous model systems. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 3830–3838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Mocek, M.; Richardson, P.J. Kinetics and mechanism of quercetin oxidation. J. Inst. Brew. 1972, 78, 459–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, J.; Zhao, X.-H. Degradation kinetics of fisetin and quercetin in solutions as effected by pH, temperature and coexisted proteins. J. Serb. Chem. Soc. 2016, 81, 243–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Jurasekova, Z.; Torreggiani, A.; Tamba, M.; Sanchez-Cortes, S.; Garcia-Ramos, J. Raman and surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) investigation of the quercetin interaction with metals: Evidence of structural changing processes in aqueous solution and on metal nanoparticles. J. Mol. Struct. 2009, 918, 129–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jurasekova, Z.; Domingo, C.; García-Ramos, J.V.; Sánchez-Cortés, S. Effect of pH on the chemical modification of quercetin and structurally related flavonoids characterized by optical (UV-visible and Raman) spectroscopy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 12802–12811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Zenkevich, I.; Pushkareva, T. Systematization of the results of the chromatography–mass spectrometry identification of the products of quercetin oxidation by atmospheric oxygen in aqueous solutions. J. Anal. Chem. 2017, 72, 1061–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Osman, A.; Makris, D.P.; Kefalas, P. Investigation on biocatalytic properties of a peroxidase-active homogenate from onion solid wastes: An insight into quercetin oxidation mechanism. Process Biochem. 2008, 43, 861–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Makris, D.P.; Rossiter, J.T. Hydroxyl free radical-mediated oxidative degradation of quercetin and morin: A preliminary investigation. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2002, 15, 103–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Barnes, J.S.; Schug, K.A. Oxidative degradation of quercetin with hydrogen peroxide using continuous-flow kinetic electrospray–ion trap–time-of-flight mass spectrometry. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 4322–4331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Abou Samra, M.; Chedea, V.S.; Economou, A.; Calokerinos, A.; Kefalas, P. Antioxidant/prooxidant properties of model phenolic compounds: Part I. Studies on equimolar mixtures by chemiluminescence and cyclic voltammetry. Food Chem. 2011, 125, 622–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Choueiri, L.; Chedea, V.S.; Calokerinos, A.; Kefalas, P. Antioxidant/pro-oxidant properties of model phenolic compounds. Part II: Studies on mixtures of polyphenols at different molar ratios by chemiluminescence and LC–MS. Food Chem. 2012, 133, 1039–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Makris, D.P.; Rossiter, J.T. Effect of natural antioxidants on heat-induced, copper (II)-catalysed, oxidative degradation of quercetin and rutin (quercetin 3-O-rutinoside) in aqueous model systems. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2002, 82, 1147–1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Barberá, J.J.; Metzger, A.; Wolf, M. Sulfites, thiosulfates, and dithionites. In Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co: Weinheim, Germany, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  36. Makhotkina, O.; Kilmartin, P.A. Electrochemical oxidation of wine polyphenols in the presence of sulfur dioxide. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 5573–5581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Ouyang, Z.; Cao, X.; Wei, Y.; Zhao, M.; Duan, J.-A. Pharmacokinetic study of rutin and quercetin in rats after oral administration of total flavones of mulberry leaf extract. Rev. Bras. Farm. 2013, 23, 776–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kleinenkuhnen, N.; Büchel, F.; Gerlich, S.C.; Kopriva, S.; Metzger, S. A novel method for identification and quantification of sulfated flavonoids in plants by neutral loss scan mass spectrometry. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Amorati, R.; Baschieri, A.; Cowden, A.; Valgimigli, L. The antioxidant activity of quercetin in water solution. Biomimetics 2017, 2, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Kinetics of Qt thermal degradation (100 μmol L−1) at pH 7.5 and 90 °C (upper plot). Verification of the first-order kinetics are shown by a linear plot (lower plot).
Figure 1. Kinetics of Qt thermal degradation (100 μmol L−1) at pH 7.5 and 90 °C (upper plot). Verification of the first-order kinetics are shown by a linear plot (lower plot).
Applsci 11 02579 g001
Figure 2. Adjustment of the sigmoidal model on the kinetic data obtained for Qt thermal degradation at various pH.
Figure 2. Adjustment of the sigmoidal model on the kinetic data obtained for Qt thermal degradation at various pH.
Applsci 11 02579 g002
Figure 3. Structures of Qt degradation/oxidation/reaction products tentatively identified in the model solutions tested. Assignments: (1) Protocatechuic acid (m/z = 151); (2) phloroglucinol carboxylic acid (m/z = 169); (3) Qt quinone (m/z = 299); (4), 2,3,4,-chalcan-trione o-quinone; (5) 3,4-dione-2-oxo-phenylacetic acid (m/z = 179); (6) Qt 3-sulfate (m/z = 381); (7) Qt 3-sulfate quinone (m/z = 379).
Figure 3. Structures of Qt degradation/oxidation/reaction products tentatively identified in the model solutions tested. Assignments: (1) Protocatechuic acid (m/z = 151); (2) phloroglucinol carboxylic acid (m/z = 169); (3) Qt quinone (m/z = 299); (4), 2,3,4,-chalcan-trione o-quinone; (5) 3,4-dione-2-oxo-phenylacetic acid (m/z = 179); (6) Qt 3-sulfate (m/z = 381); (7) Qt 3-sulfate quinone (m/z = 379).
Applsci 11 02579 g003
Figure 4. Total ion chromatogram (TIC) of a Qt solution (100 μmol L−1), treated at 90 °C, for 50 min, at pH 7.5. For peak assignment, see Table 2.
Figure 4. Total ion chromatogram (TIC) of a Qt solution (100 μmol L−1), treated at 90 °C, for 50 min, at pH 7.5. For peak assignment, see Table 2.
Applsci 11 02579 g004
Figure 5. Implementation of the sigmoidal kinetic model to trace Qt thermal degradation in the presence of various concentrations of AsA.
Figure 5. Implementation of the sigmoidal kinetic model to trace Qt thermal degradation in the presence of various concentrations of AsA.
Applsci 11 02579 g005
Figure 6. Implementation of the sigmoidal kinetic model to trace Qt thermal degradation in the presence of various concentrations of CySH.
Figure 6. Implementation of the sigmoidal kinetic model to trace Qt thermal degradation in the presence of various concentrations of CySH.
Applsci 11 02579 g006
Figure 7. Implementation of the sigmoidal kinetic model to trace Qt thermal degradation in the presence of various concentrations of sulfite.
Figure 7. Implementation of the sigmoidal kinetic model to trace Qt thermal degradation in the presence of various concentrations of sulfite.
Applsci 11 02579 g007
Figure 8. Antiradical activity (upper plot) and ferric-reducing power (lower plot) of a Qt solution (100 μmol L−1), at pH 7.5, prior to thermal treatment (Qt(i)), after 50 min at 90 °C (Qt(f)) and after 50 min at 90 °C in the presence of 200 μmol L−1 AsA, CySH and sulfite. Bars designated with different letters indicate statistically different value (p < 0.05).
Figure 8. Antiradical activity (upper plot) and ferric-reducing power (lower plot) of a Qt solution (100 μmol L−1), at pH 7.5, prior to thermal treatment (Qt(i)), after 50 min at 90 °C (Qt(f)) and after 50 min at 90 °C in the presence of 200 μmol L−1 AsA, CySH and sulfite. Bars designated with different letters indicate statistically different value (p < 0.05).
Applsci 11 02579 g008aApplsci 11 02579 g008b
Table 1. Kinetic data generated after implementing first-order and sigmoidal kinetic models.
Table 1. Kinetic data generated after implementing first-order and sigmoidal kinetic models.
pHFirst-Order ModelSigmoidal Model
k (s−1) (×10−3)t½ (s)R2k (s−1) (×10−3)t½ (s)R2
6.50.3023100.940.7621890.99
7.00.4017330.970.9214700.99
7.51.604330.933.656731.00
Table 2. Mass spectral data of the major Qt degradation products, detected in Qt solutions after treatment for 50 min, at 90 °C.
Table 2. Mass spectral data of the major Qt degradation products, detected in Qt solutions after treatment for 50 min, at 90 °C.
Peak #Rt (min)Molecular Ion (m/z)Other Fragments (m/z)Tentative IdentityFormulaQt aQt + AsA bQt + CySH cQt + Sulfite d
12.90169151 (-H2O)Phloroglucinol carboxylic acid
(2,4,6,-trihydroxybenzoic acid)
C7H5O5++++
25.16153109 (-CO2)Protocatechuic acid
(2,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid)
C7H5O4++++
312.101791193,4-dione-2-oxo-phenylacetic acidC8H3O5-+--
412.41381-Quercetin 3-sulfateC15H13O7S---+
514.22379-Quercetin 3-sulfate quinoneC15H11O7S---+
620.27301-QuercetinC15H10O7-+++
721.66299-Quercetin quinoneC15H8O7++++
a Treatment of 100 μmol L−1 Qt; b Treatment of 100 μmol L−1 Qt + 200 μmol L−1 AsA; c Treatment of 100 μmol L−1 Qt + 200 μmol L−1 CySH; d Treatment of 100 μmol L−1 Qt + 200 μmol L−1 sulfite.
Table 3. The effect of antioxidants on Qt degradation kinetics using the sigmoidal model.
Table 3. The effect of antioxidants on Qt degradation kinetics using the sigmoidal model.
Antioxidant Added (μmol L−1)Kinetic Constants *
k (s−1) (×10−3)t½ (s)R2
No Addition3.656731.00
AsA
103.519420.99
253.589690.99
504.0910420.99
1004.1811510.99
2003.8614020.99
CySH
103.367091.00
252.847490.99
502.378800.99
1002.118751.00
2002.108550.99
Na2SO3
103.099010.99
253.518850.99
503.428650.99
1003.219100.99
2002.789800.99
* Significance of model fitting was at a level higher than 99.9% (p < 0.0001).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kellil, A.; Grigorakis, S.; Loupassaki, S.; Makris, D.P. Empirical Kinetic Modelling and Mechanisms of Quercetin Thermal Degradation in Aqueous Model Systems: Effect of pH and Addition of Antioxidants. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 2579. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11062579

AMA Style

Kellil A, Grigorakis S, Loupassaki S, Makris DP. Empirical Kinetic Modelling and Mechanisms of Quercetin Thermal Degradation in Aqueous Model Systems: Effect of pH and Addition of Antioxidants. Applied Sciences. 2021; 11(6):2579. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11062579

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kellil, Abdessamie, Spyros Grigorakis, Sofia Loupassaki, and Dimitris P. Makris. 2021. "Empirical Kinetic Modelling and Mechanisms of Quercetin Thermal Degradation in Aqueous Model Systems: Effect of pH and Addition of Antioxidants" Applied Sciences 11, no. 6: 2579. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11062579

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop