Next Article in Journal
Conceptual and Preliminary Design of a Shoe Manufacturing Plant
Previous Article in Journal
Substrate-Driven Atomic Layer Deposition of High-κ Dielectrics on 2D Materials
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Applied Sciences
Volume 11
Issue 22
10.3390/app112211053
Review Report
applsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Evaluation of HMDs by QFD for Augmented Reality Applications in the Maxillofacial Surgery Domain

Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(22), 11053; https://doi.org/10.3390/app112211053
by Alessandro Carpinello 1,*, Enrico Vezzetti 2,*, Guglielmo Ramieri 1, Sandro Moos 2, Andrea Novaresio 2, Emanuele Zavattero 1 and Claudia Borbon 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(22), 11053; https://doi.org/10.3390/app112211053
Submission received: 27 September 2021 / Revised: 10 November 2021 / Accepted: 11 November 2021 / Published: 22 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Topic eHealth and mHealth: Challenges and Prospects)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This manuscript presents selection guidelines for AR in maxillofacial surgery. The manuscript is well-written and technically sound. The reviewer recommends the manuscript for publication pending the following three minor improvements:

  1. Figs 3, 5 and 7 are OK but could be considered for visual improvement as the reviewer finds them less pleasing to read.
  2. It seems the authors only mentioned the hardware of AR. Can the authors also present/elaborate on the software side (such as software packages, simulations, etc) and provide some examples for each subspecialty?
  3. Also some recent references/reviews, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-823299-6.00005-5 (AR in maxillofacial surgery), 10.1080/17434440.2016.1243054 (surgical simulation for maxillofacial surgery), 10.1109/RBME.2017.2773521 (surgical simulation).

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This is an exceptionally good paper that shows how augmented reality is useful nowaday and could be useful in surgery. It could be an important cue also for other surgical branches.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Dear coleagues,

congratulations on this intersting analysis on the the application of HMD in three operative scenarios of the maxillofacial domain. In my opinion the section 2.1 "Desk research on maxillofacial practises" is  too long and sounds textbook like, sure the readers do know what onchology, orthognatic and trauma surgery are I reccomend to shorten the section, if you want to keep the section you could mention teh actual gold standards for these surgeries like CAD CAM for ocho and navigation system for orthognatic and trauma surgery .

A few grammar mistakes should be corrected ( e.g. line 31 "was born", line 57 "a way os saying states that", others..).

On the other hand the analysis is interesting and worth pubblishing.

Kind regards,

the reviewer

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop