Next Article in Journal
Research on Intelligent Fault Diagnosis of Rolling Bearing Based on Improved Deep Residual Network
Next Article in Special Issue
Wireless Sensor Networks for Enabling Smart Production Lines in Industry 4.0
Previous Article in Journal
Integration of Micro-Structured Photovoltaic Cells into the Ultra-Light Wing Structure for Extended Range Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
Previous Article in Special Issue
Digitalization in Open-Pit Mining: A New Approach in Monitoring and Control of Rock Fragmentation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Simulator for Educating the Digital Technologies Skills in Industry. Part One. Dynamic Simulation of Technological Processes

by
Natalia Koteleva
*,
Valentin Kuznetsov
and
Natalia Vasilyeva
Mineral Raw Material Processing Faculty 2, St. Petersburg Mining University, 21 Line of Vasilyevsky Island, 199106 St. Petersburg, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(22), 10885; https://doi.org/10.3390/app112210885
Submission received: 11 October 2021 / Revised: 14 November 2021 / Accepted: 16 November 2021 / Published: 18 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Design and Manufacturing in Industry 4.0)

Abstract

:
Digital technology is being introduced into all areas of human activity. However, there are a number of challenges in implementing these technologies. These include the delayed return on investment, the lack of visibility for decision-makers and, most importantly, the lack of human capacity to develop and implement digital technologies. Therefore, creating a digital training simulator for the industry is an actual task. This paper focuses on the first step in creating a digital training simulator for the industry: developing a dynamic process model. The process chosen is flotation, as it is one of the most common mineral processing methods. The simulation was performed in AVEVA Dynamic Simulation software. The model is based on a determination of reaction rate constants, for which, experiments were conducted on a laboratory pneumomechanical flotation machine with a bottom drive. The resulting model was scaled up to industrial size and its dynamic properties were investigated. In addition, the basic scheme of a computer simulator was considered, and the testing of the communication channels of a dynamic model with systems, equipment and software for digitalizing was conducted. The developed model showed acceptable results for its intended purpose, namely, an exact match to the technological process in terms of time. This helps to account for inertia and a fast response on all tested communication channels, as well as being acceptable for the real-time simulation speed of the solver.

1. Introduction

Digital technology is dramatically gaining momentum, taking over all sectors and areas of human life around the world [1,2]. The mining industry is no exception. Digital technology is being performed and implemented at a rapid pace in mining operations [3,4]. The widespread adoption of digital technology requires a workforce capable of understanding the specifics of this technology [5,6]. It requires the right approach in developing and implementing it in an existing manufacturing environment as well. Employees who understand and are ready to implement digital technologies have to either be outsourced or retrained [7,8]. In the first case, it takes a long time for the new employee to understand the specifics and characteristics of production from scratch. In the second case, the employee needs time to learn the new technology. In both cases, it is obviously relevant to develop special systems or complexes to simplify the training [9,10].
The digital industry training simulator is such a dedicated facility. The development of specific training complexes is not a new area. There are a significant number of training complexes in different sectors [11,12]. For example, in article [13], a virtual reality collaborative planning simulator with methods for the three machines based on a multi-agent system is described. There are several types of training systems in the industry, such as the operator training simulator (OTS) [14,15]. In other words, it is a process control training system or a personal skills training system (pit management trainer, drilling rig trainer, etc.) [16,17]. For example, in article [18], a virtual excavator simulator featuring hardware-in-the loop-simulation (HILS) technology and haptic joysticks is presented. A large percentage of simulators, in the classic sense of the word, developed these days are just fly [19,20] or driver simulators [21,22,23].
The principles of developing such simulators forms a certain sequence: the development of dynamic or physical models (cab, dynamic model of a particular process), the development of training scenarios and the evaluation of the simulator’s performance [12,15]. The evaluation of the simulator performance can be carried out by several criteria. For example, Ref. [24] suggests evaluating the performance by testing it and determining its technical, functional, psychological and cognitive fidelity. If fly or driver simulators are developed and have a wide application [25], the industrial simulators are developed individually and are usually unique in its kind [26].
Paper [27] deals with the NPP (nuclear power plant) operator’s simulator. The authors point out a systematic error present in all simulators. This error occurs on two fronts: environmental biases (physical differences between the simulator and the control room) and motivational biases (cognitive differences between simulator training and NPP operation). The authors of the article propose a methodology for quantifying the effects of working on these simulators caused by these two directions and give recommendations for simulator bias experiments.
The article [28] presents the process of developing and testing a simulator for training operators of the isopropyl alcohol production plant. The UniSim software package was used to simulate the technological part. The authors emphasize the suitability of the simulator for operator training, as well as for educational purposes, engineering applications and technology analysis.
Over time, the trend is gradually changing, and there is a shift from the simulator of a unique object or process to a simulator that performs a particular function, which is then used repeatedly for different purposes. For example, in the work [29], a digital real-time simulator that predicts the behavior of power systems in a steady state and transient states is studied. This simulator is used for power system testing in extreme conditions, in design tasks, equipment adjustment, etc. There is no mention of the abolition of complex simulators covering unique processes or objects. Their construction is different for the most part, or they completely consist of separate modular block functional parts, simulating a simpler functionality.
Paper [30] presents the development of an integrated infrastructure simulator for sustainable urban energy optimization and its application. This simulator consists of several modules according to the business model with the management strategy applied in Hamamatsu city (Japan).
The work [31] explores an immersive VR-based safety training simulator that allows for procedural training to electric overhead crane (EOT) operators. The combination of simulation and VR technology is a typical solution for safety simulator.
The explosion in digitalizing is prompting producers to move urgently to adopt new technologies. Unfortunately, the economic impact of digitalization is often difficult to measure. First of all, this is due to the prolonged effect of the introduction of various digital tools. The article [32] shows that the explosive spread of digitalization affects the sustainability of specific advantages. However, this effect may be transient and may last until either a more “advanced” product appears on the market, or until the technology is no longer needed. On the other hand, the same paper shows another version when digitalization has “a winner takes all” effect. In the first and in the second case, the effect is difficult to measure, because it is impossible to determine the time during which one or another digital technology will be “on top”, and it is difficult to determine the time of winning over everything. Decision-makers are faced with enormous development and implementation costs, which overshadow the effect, especially when it is intended for the long term. The simulator will help to train staff, and can be a testing ground for new solutions related to production digitalization. For example, paper [33] emphasizes the urgent need to develop the next generation of pedagogical simulators. These simulators, according to the authors, should be simulators that combine today’s best practices (commonly used as part of bachelor and master curriculums of chemical and biochemical engineering, and are: PRO/II, Aspen Plus, Hysys, SuperPro, specific simulators that have been created as learning tools for undergraduate engineering and science students, such as BerryMaker or Labster ApS., and others like that).
Thus, simulators based on dynamic models of different parts of the production cycle and the training of specialists will significantly increase profits and reduce costs for enterprises [34,35]. Such implementations will clearly present to decision-makers the benefits of adopting a particular technology. This will improve the observability of the results of digital technology applications, and will practice the solutions developed without affecting the existing production. For instance, the work [36] shows one of such simulators, DeConSim, which is an ideologically close analogue to the simulator developed by the authors. A distinctive feature of this simulator is the ability to work in two different modes: simulation and real-time mode. This approach allows us to move from a simulator to a modeling tool underlying the control system at different levels.
Mining processes are divided into a number of stages and process steps. One important stage is the beneficiation process. The most common method is flotation for valuable metal ores [37,38]. This method, which is founded on the principles of material separation based on the wettability of the mineral surfaces, is both versatile and can be applied to a wide range of raw material types using a variety of reagents [39].
The purpose of this paper is to develop a dynamic model of the flotation process at a gold mining enterprise, to form criteria for assessing the suitability of this dynamic model for use in a digital training simulator and to evaluate the developed model against the formed criteria.
To achieve this goal, in the Materials and Methods chapter, the description of the general principles of the flotation model development and the principles of model development adopted in this paper are shown. In addition, a description of the methodology for assessing the suitability of the model for use in a computer simulator is given, the scheme of the computer simulator is developed and a description of the study of the model and testing for the suitability for use in the simulator complex are given. In the third chapter, Experiments, the description of the test object, the peculiarities of the experiments, the basic scheme of the research and the main characteristics and features of the flotation machine are given. The chapter Results presents the results of the study of flotation enrichment kinetics and a calculation of flotation rate constants for each factor. It also presents the appearance of the dynamic model and the testing results of this model, as well as the results of the study of the dynamic flotation model on the suitability of its use in a computer simulator.

2. Materials and Methods

In order to achieve set objective, materials and methods for the dynamic model development of the flotation process were used. The design of the evaluation criteria for the suitability of the dynamic model in a computer-based digital training simulator and the methodology for assessing the model to meet the specified criteria has also been considered.

2.1. Model Development

Several types of flotation models are proposed in flotation theory [40]: kinetic models; mass-balance models; and probabilistic models. The most common are kinetic flotation models. In these models, the first order kinetic equation is widely used to determine the kinetic parameters of flotation. This equation is based on the idea of an elementary flotation act as an analogue of a chemical process, where a bubble and a mineral particle interact. It follows that the rate of the flotation process is directly proportional to the number of elementary flotation acts. The coefficient of proportionality in this case is the flotation rate constant. Thus, the basis for the development is the method for determining the flotation constant [41].
However, the practice of applying these models to describe real technological processes has shown that, due to the complexity of the process, the modelling results using a single equation of flotation kinetics do not have sufficient accuracy. The solution to this problem was found in the description of the process by a system of equations with different flotation rate constants, which represents the flotation process as a set of several sub-processes. In the literature, there are two principal approaches in determining the value of flotation rate constants [42]:
  • Dividing the flotation process into sub-processes according to the phase where the process takes place and determining the rate constant for each of these sub-processes;
  • Dividing all material into flotation classes based on its hydrophobicity, and establishing the rate constant for each of these classes.
Partitioning into phases has proven to be a good idea for models using the principles of computational fluid dynamics. Kinetic laws of transition of mineral particles between “pulp phases” and “froth phases” allow us to establish correlations with calculation of particle movement trajectories in the field of velocities of the medium.
By dividing the whole material into different hydrophobic fractions, the concept of “floatability index” is introduced. The flotation index is a dimensionless value, reflecting the relative probability of particle attachment to the bubble and its further removal into the foam product by true flotation or mechanical removal. The concept is based on the principle of classifying the entire mass of flotation material into classes for particles whose difference in attachment probability is insignificant. This is necessary in order to compensate for the difference between the recovery values determined in laboratory experiments and theoretical calculations [43].
To simulate the process, AVEVA used an approach to describe flotation as analogous to a chemical process. It is based on an equation describing the change in mineral particle concentration with flotation time.
d N d t = k N m
where: N—particle concentration, k—flotation rate constant, t—flotation time.
The physical meaning of the kinetic equation’s order is conditioned by the specific number of mineral particles per air bubble. Thus, the main task is to determine the flotation rate constant.
One approach for determining the rate constant is to estimate the partial constants of the effect of the different factors on flotation efficiency. In this approach, all flotation material is divided into classes, with respect to component and size class.
k i j = k j f r o t h e r k j c o l l k a i r k i m p k i P S D
where: k i j —overall flotation rate constant for specific i—particle size class and j—reagent regime, k i P S D —flotation rate constant component that correlates with particle size distribution, k j f r o t h e r —flotation rate constant component that correlates with frother concentration in pulp for specific reagent regime, k j c o l l —flotation rate constant component that correlates with collector concentration in pulp for specific reagent regime, k a i r —flotation rate constant component that correlates with air flow rate, k i m p —flotation rate constant component that correlates with impeller speed.
This approach has several key advantages. Firstly, it allows us to more accurately account for the influence of various technological factors on the efficiency of the flotation process, based on the results of flotation tests on ores. Secondly, the approach allows for scaling the results of experimental studies from laboratory installations to industrial ones with higher values of adequacy.
One of the main issues, scaling the results of laboratory studies to industrial plants, stems from the influence of flotation cell hydrodynamics on the measure of air dispersion in the chamber. The approach to the issue is to keep the parameter of surface area bubble flux ( S b ) and the superficial gas velocity ( J g ) equal. The resulting parameters are the starting point for scaling the results. The parameter S b relates the amount of air supplied to the flotation process to the geometric parameters of the bubbles, as well as to the geometric characteristics of the machine chamber [44].
S b = 6 Q A A c e l l i = 1 n d i 3 i = 1 n d i 2 J g = Q A A c e l l d 32 = i = 1 n d i 3 i = 1 n d i 2
where: d i —bubble diameter, Q A —air flow rate, A c e l l —flotation cell’s cross-sectional area.
The geometric size distribution parameter of the bubbles was determined by analyzing the image of the air bubbles in the cell. This approach is based on the assumption that, when mineral particles attach to bubbles, the size deformation of the latter is minor. The sizing was achieved from the captured images of the dispersion process. Only the foaming agent was used.

2.2. Development of a Methodology to Assess the Suitability of the Model for Use in a Computer-Based Digital Learning Simulator

Currently, there are many technologies related to digital ones in one way or another. The work [45] investigated technologies used in the mining industry. Among them, the most in demand are: advanced process control, mine nerve center, virtual and augmented reality, automation, digital twins, artificial intelligent, robotics, big data, cyber security, etc.
Figure 1 shows a simplified diagram of the computer simulator under development. This diagram demonstrates some of its features, namely:
The control and power systems are separated into separate units (this will make it possible to understand whether to virtualize the functions of these systems or to leave the real ones in place);
The physical and dynamic models are connected together.his solution allows the user to practice the functionality on physical simplified models and to see how they scale to the size of the entire enterprise;
A separate user interface is allocated for the administrator and the instructor. This will give the instructor the ability to develop training tasks, and will give the administrator the ability to configure the system, etc.;
Models and systems are communicated using the OPC protocol. This protocol is basic and can be changed to any other (e.g., MQTT etc.).
The study of the model jointly in terms of different technologies has its own characteristics. For example, the dynamic model can be used to investigate the performance of digital twin technology as a tool for changing process conditions. Essentially, on the one hand, the model itself can be a digital twin of the processes. On the other hand, the model can be used in the development of digital twins of devices (e.g., an engine) and, thus, will simulate changes in the operating conditions (load) of the engine in terms of real plant conditions. To verify this functionality, confirm the trainer-energy system-dynamic Model connection and obtain data exchange signals between these system components.
In order to study robotics, which are IoT sensoring technologies, some physical models of the production cycle are provided in the simulator. Dynamic models are not suitable for studying these technologies as they imply direct interaction of such systems with the process.
Despite the differences in the investigation of the model and the applicability of different digital technologies to it, the testing of the model for suitability for use in a given training complex will be the same for all technologies. It will consist of a series of actions, the basis of which being to obtain an unambiguous answer as to whether the dynamic model is linked to the software or hardware used to implement a particular digital technology.
Testing will be conducted by functionality testing only, with no other factors taken into account. During testing, a protocol will be drawn up using the following template (Table 1).

3. Experiments

Flotation tests were carried out on a bottom driven pneumo-mechanical flotation cell. A sample of crushed gold-bearing sulfide ore was chosen as the object of study. The P80 parameter for the sample was 74 μm. The main gold-containing minerals in the ore were pyrite and arsenopyrite.
A series of experiments were carried out in the course of the research to study the kinetics of the flotation without collector and flotation using butyl potassium xanthate and using a collecting mixture of potassium butyl xanthate and sodium dibutyldithiophosphate. The essence of the flotation kinetics experimental studies lies in obtaining values of valuable component recovery respective to the flotation time. For that purpose, in this work, in each flotation kinetic test, six froth products were obtained for the following flotation time intervals: 30 s, 60 s, 120 s, 240 s, 360 s, 720 s. In each product, content of arsenic, iron and sulfur were analyzed to approximately access grade of pyrite and arsenopyrite. During the experiments, the airflow rate was 8 l/min and the impeller speed was 850 rpm. The algorithm of the flotation kinetic test series is shown in Figure 2.

4. Results and Discussion

The kinetics study results of the flotation process are presented in Table 2. A graphical interpretation is shown in Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5. The equation of the flotation process kinetics of the second order was used for a mathematical description of the obtained results. The equation has the form:
ε ( t ) = ε 0 t t + ε 0 k
where: ε 0 —theoretical recovery limit, k—flotation rate constant, min−1, t—flotation time, min.
On the basis of the obtained results, it was established that the maximum possible recovery of valuable components increases with the addition of sodium dibutyldithiophosphate (SBDTP) to the collectors mixture. This is likely caused by the growth of the hydrophobizing ability of the mixture, which allows us to recover mineral particles of pyrite and arsenopyrite with a lower degree of liberation into the froth product. For the second time interval, a lower value of the rate constant for arsenopyrite flotation compared to the flotation with potassium butyl xanthate (PNBX) was established. The recovery values for pyrite and arsenopyrite, established during a series of experiments of flotation without collectors, characterize the valuable component recovery in the foam product due to the mechanical removal and flotation of the maximum opened aggregates that are capable of flotation without the collector.
Based on the ratio, the values of flotation rate constants were established and the values of specific flotation rate constants for each factor were calculated. The results are presented in Table 3.
For the dynamic simulation, a pneumomechanical flotation machine with one cell was selected. The characteristics of the flotation machine are presented in Table 4.
The determining of the surface area bubble flux value was carried out on the basis of determining the size of bubbles in the process of air dispersion in the flotation machine chamber with the addition of a frother. The results of the calculations are presented in Table 5.
The analysis of the results shows that the relative velocity of the rise of bubbles grows with an increasing air flow rate, which leads to an increase in the value of the specific aeration intensity. Additionally, there is a growth in the size of the bubbles, which is caused by an increase in the specific volume of air at the points of bubble formation. This leads to an increase in the capillary pressure inside the bubbles and, as a consequence, an increase in the stability of larger bubbles.
The values of the air flow rate and bubble diameters corresponding to the relative rate of bubble rise and the specific aeration intensity in laboratory experiments were established. The obtained values were taken as the initial values for calculating the component of the dependence of the flotation rate constant on the air flow rate.
Based on the systematization of the obtained data, the values of the general flotation rate constants for different conditions were calculated. The values of constants for pyrite are summarized in Table 6.
The values of constants for arsenopyrite are summarized in Table 7.

4.1. Simulation Results

Based on the data obtained, the flotation enrichment process was simulated in the «AVEVA» software package (Figure 6).
At the first stage, the simulation of the process output to the static mode of operation was performed. The main fixed parameters were the foam bed height, concentrate productivity and extraction and content of pyrite and arsenopyrite in the concentrate. A graphical interpretation of the obtained results is presented in Figure 7, Figure 8, Figure 9 and Figure 10.
The jump of technological indicators at 11.3 min is caused by the beginning of the air supply to the flotation cell and the formation of the froth layer. The contents of both components are characterized by a sharp increase at the stage from 11.3 to 13.6 min with a subsequent decrease. At the same time, the values of extractions systematically grow. This is caused by a sharp drop in the concentrate yield due to a high mineralization of the foam and its destruction. However, after the stage of the sharp decline, there is a stabilization of the foam layer and a gradual increase in the content and yield of the froth product. After the air supply, the flotation process reaches the stationary mode in 26.1 min of simulation time.
In the second stage, the effect of changes in the productivity of the flotation operation on the feed and air flow rate was evaluated. In addition, the foam height and concentrate productivity were investigated. In the simulation mode, we simulated changes in the power supply performance one by one and then simulated changes in the air flow rate. The values of changes for the supply and air flow rate were 10% of the initial values. A graphical interpretation of the obtained results is shown in Figure 11, Figure 12, Figure 13, Figure 14, Figure 15 and Figure 16.
Through the results of the simulation, it is established that, at an interval from 0 min till 4.5 min, the difference in the responses on the change in parameters is insignificant. At 4.5 min of the simulation, there is a sharp decrease in the foam layer height with a decrease in the air flow rate, which entails a sharp increase in the content of valuable components and a drop in their recovery to the froth. However, at the end of the simulation, the difference in the valuable component content for both investigated scenarios is insignificant, where the difference in extractions for pyrite is 2.39% and for arsenopyrite is 3.58%.
This is due to the effect of an uneven reduction in the degree of the aeration of the pulp. With a decrease in the air flow rate, there is a decrease in the stability and height of the foam layer. In the foam zone, the non-uniformity of the water content over the layer height is created, which reduces the carrying capacity of the foam. Thus, only opened clusters of valuable minerals are carried into the concentrate. However, after the water content values equalize along the height of the foam layer, the content values return to the initial ones. At the same time, reducing the air flow rate reduced the value of the height at which the foam can be stable. This is associated with the yield of the concentrate and the possible extraction of valuable components.
The obtained results should be taken into account when implementing control and automation systems for flotation processes. Reducing the power supply to the process does not lead to a violation of the stability of the process. In this case, a change in technological indicators occurs smoothly. At the same time, when changing the air flow rate, there are noticeable violations of the dynamics of the process, and it takes time to return to the steady state.

4.2. Study Results of the Dynamic Model of Flotation on the Suitability of Its Use in a Computer Simulator

Table 8 shows the results of dynamic model testing.
As can be seen from the results, most of the tests ended with the result “passed test”, which means that the developed dynamic model of flotation is suitable for use in the structure of the developed computer simulator. It should be emphasized that achieving most of the functionality is possible only when creating models of the entire chain of the production cycle. Thus, the developed model has a number of advantages over other known approaches discussed in the introduction. Compared to the approach that accurately simulates some actions (pilot or driver simulator), the proposed solution is more targeted to the needs of the industry. For the industry, the operator’s reaction is necessary as a brain activity in order to analyze different situations. The dynamic properties of the developed model showed an exact correspondence to the technological process in terms of values achieved in the process of functioning and in terms of the time of achieving these values. A clear advantage of this model is that, in the process of its use, it will take into account the inertia, which is an important factor in the control. The strengths also include the successful passing of the test in almost all communication channels that allow for the connection of digital elements today and the fast response of the model on all communication channels, as well as the acceptable speed of the solver, which allows us to simulate the real time mode on this simulator.

5. Conclusions

The development of computer simulators aimed at the application of digital technology in the industry is an important and urgent task. An important element of this computer simulator is the development of dynamic process models. These models, on the one hand, should provide accuracy; that is, when verifying the model by real production data, the model accuracy should not be less than 95%. On the other hand, an important aspect is to find so-called “islands of reality” in the functionality of dynamic models. Their development should be carried out with physical models, partially repeating those or other solutions in the industry. A prerequisite for such a simulator is a physical representation of the control and power system. This is necessary in order to be able to connect from dynamic models to real equipment and other hardware devices during training. In a number of technologies, this functionality is mandatory. For example, when developing digital twin technologies, when testing automation algorithms, information security systems, etc.
This paper shows the process of developing a dynamic simulation model of flotation in AVEVA Dynamic Simulation software, where the model verification is carried out using data from the laboratory pneumomechanical flotation machine with the bottom drive. In addition, testing of the dynamic model was conducted. It presented the readiness and feasibility of using the model in the overall structure of the simulator software complex, as well as the ability to integrate solutions of the dynamic simulation model with known systems, software and equipment of digital technology. The authors emphasize that this study is the beginning of a huge work on the development of the simulator complex. In the next stages, the authors will develop models of related processes of the enrichment chain in detail-crushing, screening, etc., will work out a model of the power supply and automation system, based on the results of testing and will perform connections of the model to real objects of the power supply and elements of the automation system. A series of experiments will be conducted in a mixed model/real objects format. In addition, the authors will design different scenarios for training: start/stop, emergencies, scenarios of inclusions of digital technologies in the structures of the developed models, scenarios of interactions of model units in different variants, etc.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.K. and V.K.; methodology, N.K., N.V. and V.K; software, V.K.; experiments, V.K.; formal analysis, N.V.; writing—original draft preparation, V.K., N.K.; writing—review and editing, N.V.; visualization, N.V. and V.K.; supervision, N.K.; project administration, N.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study was carried out at the expense of a subsidy for the fulfillment of the state task in the field of scientific activity for 2021 No. FSRW-2020-0014.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The study was carried out at the expense of a subsidy for the fulfillment of the state task in the field of scientific activity for 2021 No. FSRW-2020-0014. The authors express their gratitude to the head of the Department of Mineral Processing of the Saint-Petersburg Mining University, Aleksandrova Tatyana Nikolaevna, for her help in preparing articles and conducting experiments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Shabalov, M.; Zhukovskiy, Y.; Buldysko, A.; Gil, B.; Starshaia, V. The influence of technological changes in energy efficiency on the infrastructure deterioration in the energy sector. Energy Rep. 2021, 7, 2664–2680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Brink, H.; Kilbrink, N.; Gericke, N. Teaching digital models: Secondary technology teachers’ experiences. Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ. 2021, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Boikov, A.; Payor, V.; Savelev, R.; Kolesnikov, A. Synthetic Data Generation for Steel Defect Detection and Classification Using Deep Learning. Symmetry 2021, 13, 1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Litvinenko, V.S. Digital Economy as a Factor in the Technological Development of the Mineral Sector. Nat. Resour. Res. 2020, 29, 1521–1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bergdahl, N.; Nouri, J.; Fors, U. Disengagement, engagement and digital skills in technology-enhanced learning. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2019, 25, 957–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Vasilenko, N.; Khaikin, M.; Lapinskas, A. Ways of Achieving the Institutional Equilibrium in the Context of an Emerging Single Digital Space. In Ubiquitous Computing and the Internet of Things: Prerequisites for the Development of ICT. Studies in Computational Intelligence; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; pp. 559–567. [Google Scholar]
  7. Razmanova, S.; Andrukhova, O. Oilfield service companies as part of economy digitalization: Assessment of the prospects for innovative development. Записки Гoрнoгo Института 2020, 244, 482–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pala, M.; Başıbüyük, A. The Predictive Effect of Digital Literacy, Self-Control and Motivation on the Academic Achievement in the Science, Technology and Society Learning Area. Technol. Knowl. Learn. 2021, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ilgaz, H. Shifting to digital with 21st century skills. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 2021, 69, 199–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Katuntsov, E.V.; Kultan, Y.; Makhovikov, A.B. Application of electronic learning tools for training of specialists in the field of information technologies for enterprises of mineral resources sector. J. Min. Inst. 2017, 226, 503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rudakov, M.; Smirnyakova, V.; Almosova, Y.; Kargopolova, A.; Suek-Kuzbass, J. Factor Analysis of Industrial Injuries with the Purpose to Improve the Procedures for Training the Employees in Occupational Safety during Coal Mining. Occup. Saf. Ind. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Beloglazov, I.I.; Petrov, P.A.; Bazhin, V.Y. The concept of digital twins for tech operator training simulator design for mining and processing industry. Eurasian Min. 2020, 50–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xie, J.; Yang, Z.; Wang, X.; Zeng, Q.; Li, J.; Li, B. A Virtual Reality Collaborative Planning Simulator and Its Method for Three Machines in a Fully Mechanized Coal Mining Face. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2018, 43, 4835–4854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Toro, R.; Ortiz, J.M.; Zamora, C.; Maya, J.M.O. An Integrated Simulation-Based Solution for Operator Effectiveness. IFAC Proc. Vol. 2013, 46, 65–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dozortsev, V.M.; Agafonov, D.V.; Nazin, V.A.; Novichkov, A.Y.; Frolov, A.I. Computerized Operator Training: Continued Importance, New Opportunities, and the Human Factor. Autom. Remote Control 2020, 81, 935–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Patle, D.; Ahmad, Z.; Rangaiah, G. Operator training simulators in the chemical industry: Review, issues, and future directions. Rev. Chem. Eng. 2014, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pan, Y.; Oksavik, A.; Hildre, H.P. Making Sense of Maritime Simulators Use: A Multiple Case Study in Norway. Technol. Knowl. Learn. 2020, 26, 661–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Nam, Y.-J.; Park, M.-K. Virtual excavator simulator featuring HILS and haptic joysticks. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 2015, 29, 397–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Saastamoinen, K.; Maunula, K. Usefulness of flight simulator as a part of military pilots training—Case study: Grob G 115E. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2021, 192, 1670–1676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mairaj, A.; Baba, A.I.; Javaid, A.Y. Application specific drone simulators: Recent advances and challenges. Simul. Model. Pract. Theory 2019, 94, 100–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Kuniyoshi, J.R.G.; Costa, A.T.; Figueira, A.C.; Kabbach, F.I.; Larocca, A.P.C. Driver’s visual perception as a function of age. Using a driving simulator to explore driver’s eye movements in vertical signs. Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect. 2021, 11, 100460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Shah, D.; Lee, C. Analysis of effects of driver’s evasive action time on rear-end collision risk using a driving simulator. J. Saf. Res. 2021, 78, 242–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Brookhuis, K.A. Driving Simulators. Int. Encycl. Transp. 2021, 14–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kim, T.-E.; Sharma, A.; Bustgaard, M.; Gyldensten, W.C.; Nymoen, O.K.; Tusher, H.M.; Nazir, S. The continuum of simulator-based maritime training and education. WMU J. Marit. Aff. 2021, 20, 135–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Cacciabue, P.C.; Enjalbert, S.; Söderberg, H.; Tapani, A. Unified Driver Model simulation and its application to the automotive, rail and maritime domains. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 2013, 21, 315–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Marcano, L.; Haugen, F.A.; Sannerud, R.; Komulainen, T. Review of simulator training practices for industrial operators: How can individual simulator training be enabled? Saf. Sci. 2019, 115, 414–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Shirley, R.B.; Smidts, C. Bridging the simulator gap: Measuring motivational bias in digital nuclear power plant environments. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2018, 177, 191–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Puskás, J.; Egedy, A.; Németh, S. Development of operator training simulator for isopropyl alcohol producing plant. Educ. Chem. Eng. 2018, 22, 35–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liu, J.; Chen, Y.; Ding, H.; Zhang, Y. Development of phase domain frequency-dependent transmission line model on FPGA for real-time digital simulator. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 2021, 197, 107305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Inage, S.; Uchino, Y. Development of an integrated infrastructure simulator for sustainable urban energy optimization and its application. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2020, 39, 100710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dhalmahapatra, K.; Maiti, J.; Krishna, O. Assessment of virtual reality based safety training simulator for electric overhead crane operations. Saf. Sci. 2021, 139, 105241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Knudsen, E.S.; Lien, L.B.; Timmermans, B.; Belik, I.; Pandey, S. Stability in turbulent times? The effect of digitalization on the sustainability of competitive advantage. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 128, 360–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Heras, S.C.D.L.; Gargalo, C.L.; Weitze, C.L.; Mansouri, S.S.; Gernaey, K.V.; Krühne, U. A framework for the development of Pedagogical Process Simulators (P2Si) using explanatory models and gamification. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2021, 151, 107350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Marinin, M.A.; Khokhlov, S.; Isheyskiy, V.A. Modeling of the Welding Process of Flat Sheet Parts by an Explosion. Записки Гoрнoгo Института 2019, 237, 275–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Menesklou, P.; Sinn, T.; Nirschl, H.; Gleiss, M. Grey Box Modelling of Decanter Centrifuges by Coupling a Numerical Process Model with a Neural Network. Minerals 2021, 11, 755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. D’Amico, R.D.; Egger, G.; Giusti, A.; Rauch, E.; Riedl, M.; Matt, D.T. Communication Concept of DeConSim: A Decentralized Control Simulator for Production Systems. Procedia Manuf. 2018, 24, 100–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Alexandrova, T.; Romashev, A.; Potemkin, V. Justification of evaluation criteria of gold beneficiation ability by gravitational methods. J. Appl. Eng. Sci. 2020, 18, 230–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Aleksandrova, T.N.; Afanasova, A.V.; Aleksandrova, A.V. Microwave Treatment to Reduce Refractoriness of Carbonic Concentrates. J. Min. Sci. 2020, 56, 136–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Aldrich, C.; Marais, C.; Shean, B.J.; Cilliers, J.J. Online monitoring and control of froth flotation systems with machine vision: A review. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2010, 96, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gharai, M.; Venugopal, R. Modeling of flotation process—An overview of different approaches. Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. Rev. 2016, 37, 120–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Brożek, M.; Młynarczykowska, A. Analysis of kinetics models of batch flotation. Physicochem. Probl. Miner. Process. 2007, 41, 51–65. [Google Scholar]
  42. Quintanilla, P.; Neethling, S.J.; Brito-Parada, P.R. Modelling for froth flotation control: A review. Miner. Eng. 2020, 162, 106718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Bergh, L.G.; Yianatos, J.B. The long way toward multivariate predictive control of flotation processes. J. Process. Control. 2011, 21, 226–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Finch, J.; Xiao, J.; Hardie, C.; Gomez, C. Gas dispersion properties: Bubble surface area flux and gas holdup. Miner. Eng. 2000, 13, 365–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Barnewold, L.; Lottermoser, B.G. Identification of digital technologies and digitalisation trends in the mining industry. Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol. 2020, 30, 747–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Diagram of the computer simulator under development.
Figure 1. Diagram of the computer simulator under development.
Applsci 11 10885 g001
Figure 2. The algorithm of the experimental series.
Figure 2. The algorithm of the experimental series.
Applsci 11 10885 g002
Figure 3. Recovery profiles for flotation without collectors.
Figure 3. Recovery profiles for flotation without collectors.
Applsci 11 10885 g003
Figure 4. Recovery profiles for flotation with PNBX application.
Figure 4. Recovery profiles for flotation with PNBX application.
Applsci 11 10885 g004
Figure 5. Recovery profiles for flotation with PNBX and SDBTP application.
Figure 5. Recovery profiles for flotation with PNBX and SDBTP application.
Applsci 11 10885 g005
Figure 6. Flotation model.
Figure 6. Flotation model.
Applsci 11 10885 g006
Figure 7. FeS2 concentrate recovery.
Figure 7. FeS2 concentrate recovery.
Applsci 11 10885 g007
Figure 8. FeS2 concentrate grade.
Figure 8. FeS2 concentrate grade.
Applsci 11 10885 g008
Figure 9. FeAsS concentrate recovery.
Figure 9. FeAsS concentrate recovery.
Applsci 11 10885 g009
Figure 10. FeAsS concentrate grade.
Figure 10. FeAsS concentrate grade.
Applsci 11 10885 g010
Figure 11. Concentrate mass flow rate values in the simulation.
Figure 11. Concentrate mass flow rate values in the simulation.
Applsci 11 10885 g011
Figure 12. Froth height values in the simulation.
Figure 12. Froth height values in the simulation.
Applsci 11 10885 g012
Figure 13. FeS2 concentrate recovery values in the simulation.
Figure 13. FeS2 concentrate recovery values in the simulation.
Applsci 11 10885 g013
Figure 14. FeS2 concentrate grade values in the simulation.
Figure 14. FeS2 concentrate grade values in the simulation.
Applsci 11 10885 g014
Figure 15. FeAsS concentrate recovery values in the simulation.
Figure 15. FeAsS concentrate recovery values in the simulation.
Applsci 11 10885 g015
Figure 16. FeAsS concentrate grade values in the simulation.
Figure 16. FeAsS concentrate grade values in the simulation.
Applsci 11 10885 g016
Table 1. Testing template.
Table 1. Testing template.
ActionExpected ResultTest Result (Passed/Failed/Blocked)
Action 1Result 1Passed/Failed/Blocked
Table 2. The kinetics study results of flotation enrichment.
Table 2. The kinetics study results of flotation enrichment.
Valuable ComponentTime Intervalsε0, %k, min−1
Flotation without collectorsPyrite-15.0414.45
Arsenopyrite-9.678.10
Potassium butyl xanthatePyrite-46.73100.00
Arsenopyrite-38.6136.10
Potassium butyl xanthate and sodium dibutyldithiophosphatePyriteI70.42166.67
ArsenopyriteI46.5158.48
PyriteII90.91103.09
ArsenopyriteII76.9229.76
Table 3. Established kinetic constants for simulation.
Table 3. Established kinetic constants for simulation.
Valuable Componentkfrother, min−1kPNBX, min−1kSBDTP (I), min−1kSBDTP (II), min−1
Pyrite14.456.921.671.03
Arsenopyrite8.104.461.620.82
Table 4. Simulated flotation cell’s parameters.
Table 4. Simulated flotation cell’s parameters.
Flotation Machine Chamber Volume, m3Height of the Working Area of the Flotation Machine Chamber, mMaximum Air Volume Supplied to the Aerator, m3/minCross-Sectional Area of the Flotation Machine Chamber, m2
25.03.813.06.58
Table 5. Parameters for modeling of gas distribution in flotation cell.
Table 5. Parameters for modeling of gas distribution in flotation cell.
Parameters of the Laboratory Flotation Machine
QA, m3·min−1Acell, m2d32, mSb
0.0080.0170.009315.58
Operating parameters of an industrial plant for an identical value of bubble rise rate
3.096.580.0089315.58
Industrial plant parameters for various air flow rates and bubble diameters
2.46.580.0123177.28
4.86.580.0138317.42
7.26.580.0152430.99
9.66.580.0167524.87
Table 6. Established flotation rate constants for pyrite.
Table 6. Established flotation rate constants for pyrite.
QA, m3·min−1Flotation Rate Constants for the Collectors Used
Collectorless FlotationPNBXPNBX + SBDTP (I)PBX + SBDTP (II)
1.978.1456.3394.0796.89
3.0914.57100.86168.43173.48
3.9519.79136.94228.69235.55
5.9224.10166.77278.51286.87
Table 7. Established flotation rate constants for arsenopyrite.
Table 7. Established flotation rate constants for arsenopyrite.
QA, m3·min−1Flotation Rate Constants for the Collectors Used
Collectorless FlotationPNBXPNBX + SBDTP (I)PBX + SBDTP (II)
1.974.5520.2932.8826.96
3.098.1536.3458.8748.27
3.9511.0649.3479.9365.54
5.9213.4760.0997.3479.82
Table 8. Testing results.
Table 8. Testing results.
ActionExpected ResultTest Result (Passed/Failed/Blocked)
OPC-simulation model (SM)Read/write value in dynamic modepassed
SQL–OPC-SMRead/write value in dynamic modepassed
Unity-OPC-SMRead/write value in dynamic modepassed
Unity-SQL–OPC-SMRead value in dynamic modepassed
Unity-SQL–OPC-SMWrite value in dynamic modefailed
VitoriaStudio-OPC-SMRead/write value in dynamic modepassed
HoloLens2-OPC-SMRead/write value in dynamic modepassed
AppleIPad12-OPC-SMRead/write value in dynamic modepassed
Smartphone (OS_Android_10)Read/write value in dynamic modepassed
Buttons-PLC-OPC-SMWrite value in dynamic modepassed
SM-OPC-SCADARead/write value in dynamic modepassed
Engine-Smartlink_si-SMRead/write value in dynamic modepassed
SM-OPC-WebAPPRead/write value in dynamic modepassed
SM-OPC-SQL-WebAPPRead/write value in dynamic modepassed
SM-MQTT (publisher)Read/write value in dynamic modefailed
SM-MQTT (subscriber)Read/write value in dynamic modefailed
SM-OPC-MQTTRead/write value in dynamic modepassed
SM-OPC-SQL-MatLAB (Artificial intelligent module, predictive analytics and others)Read/write value in dynamic modepassed
SM-OPC-SQL-Jupiter notebook-(python tensorflow (Artificial intelligent module)Read/write value in dynamic modepassed
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Koteleva, N.; Kuznetsov, V.; Vasilyeva, N. A Simulator for Educating the Digital Technologies Skills in Industry. Part One. Dynamic Simulation of Technological Processes. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 10885. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112210885

AMA Style

Koteleva N, Kuznetsov V, Vasilyeva N. A Simulator for Educating the Digital Technologies Skills in Industry. Part One. Dynamic Simulation of Technological Processes. Applied Sciences. 2021; 11(22):10885. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112210885

Chicago/Turabian Style

Koteleva, Natalia, Valentin Kuznetsov, and Natalia Vasilyeva. 2021. "A Simulator for Educating the Digital Technologies Skills in Industry. Part One. Dynamic Simulation of Technological Processes" Applied Sciences 11, no. 22: 10885. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112210885

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop