Next Article in Journal
Opportunistic Strategy for Maintenance Interventions Planning: A Case Study in a Wastewater Treatment Plant
Next Article in Special Issue
Reaction Center of Rhodobacter Sphaeroides, a Photoactive Protein for pH Sensing: A Theoretical Investigation of Charge Transport Properties
Previous Article in Journal
Forecasting the Daily Maximal and Minimal Temperatures from Radiosonde Measurements Using Neural Networks
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Applied Sciences
Volume 11
Issue 22
10.3390/app112210854
applsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Electrospinning Preparation of GaN:ZnO Solid Solution Nanorods with Visible-Light-Driven Photocatalytic Activity toward H2 Production

by
Jingyun Mao
1,2,
Huiling Zhong
1,2,
Xinpin Liu
1,2,
Qingrong Qian
1,2,
Yongjin Luo
1,2,
Liren Xiao
1,2,* and
Hun Xue
1,2,*
1
College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350007, China
2
Fujian Key Laboratory of Pollution Control & Resource Reuse, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350007, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(22), 10854; https://doi.org/10.3390/app112210854
Submission received: 7 October 2021 / Revised: 6 November 2021 / Accepted: 8 November 2021 / Published: 17 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Frontiers in Optical Materials)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The development of a facile method for the synthesis of GaN:ZnO solid solution, an attractive material with a wurtzite-type structure, is vital to enhance its photocatalytic activity toward H2 evolution. Herein, GaN:ZnO solid solution nanorods with diameters of around 180 nm were fabricated by combining the electro-spun method with a sequentially calcinating process. Photocatalytic water-splitting activities of the as-obtained samples loaded with Rh2−yCryO3 co-catalyst were estimated by H2 evolution under visible-light irradiation. The as-prepared GaN:ZnO nanorods at a nitridation temperature of 850 °C showed the optimal performance. Careful characterization of the GaN:ZnO solid solution nanorods indicated that the nitridation temperature is an important parameter affecting the photocatalytic performance, which is related to the specific surface area and the absorbable visible-light wavelength range. Finally, the mechanism of the GaN:ZnO solid solution nanorods was also investigated. The proposed synthesis strategy paves a new way to realize excellent activity and recyclability of GaN:ZnO solid solution nanorod photocatalysts for hydrogen generation.

1. Introduction

In recent years, the modern energy crisis has been one of the major problems that has concerned human beings in the 21st century. Therefore, a recent flourish of studies have been inspired to develop environmental-friendly and renewable fuels [1]. Particularly, the use of photocatalytic water splitting for hydrogen production is an attractive strategy in the field of energy conversion with abundant solar energy, since the pioneering report of photoelectrochemical water splitting was published in 1972 [2]. Currently, a lot of photocatalysts, such as TiO2 [3,4,5], WO3 [6,7], g-C3N4 [8,9,10], ZnO [11,12,13], and metal complexes [14,15,16], have been employed for the photocatalytic water splitting reaction. However, it has been demonstrated that most of these photocatalysts with wide band gaps are only active under UV irradiation. Thus, it is vital to develop a highly active photocatalyst with a sufficiently narrower bandgap for efficient visible-light-driven hydrogen production.
So far, nitride [17,18] or metal oxynitrides [19,20], absorbing visible light with a larger wavelength range, have been found to be capable of splitting water into hydrogen and oxygen under visible-light illumination. Among them, GaN:ZnO solid solution possesses a wurtzite-type structure with a d10 typical electronic configuration, which has been actively investigated [21,22]. It shows a narrower band gap, ranging from 2.4~2.8 eV [23,24], which can be ascribed to the p-d repulsion in the valence band between Ga3d/Zn3d and N2p/O2p [25]. However, as for GaN:ZnO solid solution, due to the lack of H2 evolution sites, it is necessary to employ a cocatalyst that plays a vital role in providing active sites and improving the charge separation for photocatalytic redox reactions [26,27,28]. Rh2−yCryO3, as a traditional cocatalyst, has been found to be capable of promoting the realization of the photocatalytic water splitting [29,30]. Therefore, high-efficiency GaN:ZnO solid solutions decorated with cocatalyst of Rh2−yCryO3 were designed and prepared.
Typically, GaN:ZnO is synthesized by nitriding the mixture of Ga2O3 and ZnO under anhydrous NH3 gas flow, and calcinating it for a relatively long reaction period to guarantee a successful formation of solid solution [21,31,32]. However, the as-prepared GaN:ZnO possesses a non-uniform elemental distribution of Zn and Ga after long-term nitriding [24,33]. Herein, it is significant to develop a facile and versatile approach to prepare the GaN:ZnO solid solution with higher homogeneous particles. In recent years, electrospinning has been proven as a simple and widely used technology for the preparation of nanofiber materials with a larger specific surface area and better light harvesting ability [34,35,36]. The electro-spun nanofibers also show good recoverable character in comparison to nano-powders [37]. Furthermore, the problem of the elemental aggregation of GaN:ZnO solid solution can be efficiently eliminated by immobilizing the elements of Ga and Zn on polyacrylonitrile (PAN) during the electro-spun process [38].
In this study, we present for the first time nanorod GaN:ZnO solid solutions prepared using an electrospinning method for photocatalytic H2 production under visible-light irradiation. The phase microstructure and morphology of the nanorods prepared at different nitriding temperatures were determined. The optical properties were evaluated via UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectra (DRS), photoluminescence (PL), and an electrochemistry workstation. The photocatalytic efficiency of the samples was estimated by water-splitting H2 production under visible-light irradiation. In addition, the photocatalytic mechanism of GaN:ZnO solid solution under visible-light irradiation was proposed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Gallium nitrate (Ga(NO3)3·xH2O) and Trisodium Hexachlororhodate (Na3RhCl6·xH2O) were purchased from Aladdin and Alfa Aesar Companies, respectively. Zinc nitrate (Zn(NO3)2·6H2O), N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), and chromic nitrate (Cr(NO3)3·9H2O) were provided by the company of Sinopharm; and polyacrylonitrile (PAN, Mw = 150,000 g·moL−1) and methyl alcohol (CH3OH) were obtained from Macklin. All the chemicals were of analytical grade and were used without any purification. Deionized (DI) water was used throughout.

2.2. Synthesis of Ga(NO3)3-Zn(NO3)3/PAN Nanofibers and GaN:ZnO Solid Solutions

The 10 wt% solution of PAN (Mw = 150,000 g·moL−1) was prepared by dissolving it in N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF). An appropriate amount of Ga(NO3)3·xH2O and Zn(NO3)2·6H2O with a mole ratio of Ga to Zn = 1:1 was mixed into the as-prepared PAN solution with a weight ratio of PAN to salt of 4:1. Then, it was vigorously stirred at an ambient temperature for 5 h with the purpose of forming a homogeneous and translucent precursor solution. After, the solution was delivered by syringe with a flow rate of 0.6 mL·h−1 and using a high voltage of 28.5 kV, and the distance between the needle tip and the collector was 15 cm. Herein, the obtained Ga(NO3)3-Zn(NO3)3/PAN nanofiber was preserved in a desiccator at room temperature.
The as-spun composite nanofibers were nitrided at temperatures of 750, 850, and 950 °C for 3 h with a heating rate of 5 °C·min−1 in a flow of 150 sccm NH3, respectively, and then the as-nitrided samples were calcined at 400 °C for 2 h with a cooling rate of 5 °C·min−1 and continuously at 500 °C for 3 h in the air atmosphere. Three samples of GaN:ZnO solid solutions synthesized at different nitriding temperatures were denoted as S750, S850, and S950, respectively.

2.3. Preparation of Rh2−yCryO3-GaN:ZnO Photocatalyst

Briefly, 4 mL of distilled water containing an appropriate amount of Na3RhCl6·nH2O (Rh 17.8 wt%) and Cr(NO3)3·9H2O were added into 0.1 g of GaN:ZnO solid solution and the obtained sample was dried at 60 °C after the suspension was stirred to complete evaporation. The resulting powder was heated at 350 °C for 1 h in air atmosphere, and the sample of Rh2−yCryO3-GaN:ZnO was obtained, where Rh and Cr were loaded at a ratio of 1 wt% and 1.5 wt% (metallic content).

2.4. Characterization

X-ray diffraction (XRD) was recorded on a Bruker D8 Advance X-ray diffractometer using Cu-Kα radiation operating at an accelerating voltage and applied current of 40 kV and 40 mA, respectively. UV-visible diffuse reflectance spectra (DRS) were measured using a Varian Cary 500 apparatus equipped with an integrating sphere, using BaSO4 as a reference. Field emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JEOL JSM-7500F) was used to characterize the morphology of the as-prepared samples. The (high-resolution) transmission electron microscopy ((HR)TEM, JEOL JEM-2100) images were obtained with accelerating voltages of 200 kV. Photoluminescence (PL) measurements were detected on an FLSP920 (EI) fluorescence spectrophotometer. Photocurrent measurements and Mott–Schottky curves were recorded using an electrochemical workstation (Versa STAT3, Princeton Instruments, America). The specific preparation method of the working electrode was as follows: 5 mg of sample were ultrasonically dispersed in 1 mL of N,N-dimethylformamide solution, and then 10 μL of the above turbid solution were coated (the coating area was 0.5 cm × 0.5 cm) on the FTO conductive glass.

2.5. Photocatalytic Measurements

Hydrogen evolution experiments were performed in a glass closed photocatalytic activity evaluation system (LabSolar-IIIAG, Perfectlight). The light source was provided by a 300 W Xe lamp (PLS-SXE300, Perfectlight) equipped with a filter to block certain light (λ < 400 nm). Then, 100 mg of the as-prepared photocatalyst were dispersed in 100 mL of distilled water containing 10 vol% methyl alcohol as the sacrificial agent in a Pyrex top-irradiation reaction vessel. Prior to irradiation, the evaluation system was pumped to remove air. Then, the sealed vessel was illuminated by visible light for 6 h under constant magnetic stirring. The amount of H2 generated from water splitting was monitored by the gas chromatograph (GC-8A, Shimadzu) equipped with a MS-5Å column and a TCD-detector. High-purity argon was employed as a carrier gas.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Physicochemical Properties of the Obtained Samples

Figure 1 shows the crystalline structure of the as-prepared samples obtained at different calcination temperatures. Apparently, the samples of S750, S850, and S950 exhibited diffraction peaks that were basically attributed to GaN:ZnO solid solution with a wurtzite structure [21]. However, in the comparison of S850 and S950, S750 showed three peaks at 2θ values of 30.30, 35.70, and 43.39°, which corresponded to (220), (311), and (400) diffraction planes for ZnGa2O4 (JCPDS card 860415), indicating its incomplete nitridation. Furthermore, the intensity of the peaks corresponding to the GaN:ZnO solid solution in S750 were weaker than that of S850 and S950, which means the higher nitridation temperature induced a higher crystallinity. The peaks around 37° of the samples exhibited a higher intensity than that of GaN:ZnO solid solution with the general wurtzite structure, which can be attributed to the stacking disorder of the zinc-blende domain [39,40].
To determine the energy range of photoexcitation, diffuse reflectance spectra are illustrated in Figure 1b. It shows the UV-visible absorption spectra of GaN:ZnO solid solution subjected to different calcination temperatures. The samples showed obvious absorption in the visible light region while the calcination temperature had a certain influence on the band gap of the samples. S850 displayed an absorption edge at around 450 nm, corresponding to a band gap of about 2.76 eV. After increasing the calcination temperature, the absorption edge shifted slightly to longer wavelengths because of the increase of the particle size. For S750, the blue shift in the absorption edge was mainly attributed to the presence of ZnGa2O4.
The N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms (Figure 1c) show that all three samples (S750, S850, and S950) displayed type-IV isotherms, which correspond to the mesoporous materials. The BET surface areas of S750, S850, and S950 were estimated as 18.3, 44.8, and 11.7 m2/g, respectively. Additionally, the average pore sizes were about 4.0, 4.3, and 5.2 nm for the S750, S850, and S950 nanorods (Figure 1d). The main reason for S850 having a larger surface area than S750 is that the higher temperature is well situated to the pore-forming effect of the release of gases from the thermal polycondensation of PAN. As for S950, the increase of the nitridation temperature led to an enlargement of the nanoparticles that make up the nanorods, resulting in a small surface area. Further, the increased average pore size with the nitridation temperatures can be ascribed to the enlarged particles with an enhanced temperature. In most cases, the higher surface area could provide more active sites in the process of photocatalytic H2 evolution. These results indicate that the change in the specific surface area caused by different nitriding temperatures plays a significant role in the improved photocatalytic performance.
Figure 2a–d show the SEM images of Ga(NO3)3-Zn(NO3)3/PAN, S750, S850, and S950. Ga(NO3)3-Zn(NO3)3/PAN nanofibers with diameters of around 180 nm, which possess continuous uniform and unblemished smooth structures. Figure 2b shows a broken fiber morphology of S750, which can be attributed to the rapid escape of the gas-phase product during the calcination process. In addition, some agglomerates annexed to the fibers’ surfaces, which can be assigned to the ZnGa2O4 residues, and this is in good accordance with the XRD analysis. S850 exhibited a square rod-like structure consisting of nanoparticles and no agglomerates residues were found on the surfaces of the nanorods (Figure 2c). As for S950, the nanoparticles that make up the nanorods grew larger due to to the excessive nitridation temperature as can be clearly seen in Figure 2d. The EDS result (Figure 2e) of S850 evidently confirms the successful synthesis of GaN:ZnO solid solution. The corresponding TEM images of S850 further revealed that the nanorods consisted of nanoparticles, as shown in Figure 3a,b. Clear distinct crystal fringes of d = 0.280 nm and d = 0.246 nm were observed in the HRTEM images of S850, as illustrated in Figure 3c,d, which correspond to the (100) and (101) planes of GaN and ZnO, respectively.

3.2. Photocatalytic H2 Evolution Performance

The photocatalytic performance of GaN:ZnO solid solution was evaluated by water splitting for H2 production under visible light. Figure 4a shows the production of H2 of the water splitting reaction on Rh2-yCryO3-loaded GaN:ZnO solid solution under xenon lamp irradiation (λ > 400 nm). The H2 evolution performance rate in 6 h is presented in Figure 4b, and the average evolution rates of H2 for S750, S850, and S950 were about 47.44, 53.44, and 42.15 μmoL·g−1·h−1, respectively. The decreased activity for S950 may be attributed to its nanocrystallite having a larger size, lower BET surface areas, and higher degree of crystallization. As for S750, the lower photocatalytic efficiency can be attributed to the incomplete transformation to GaN:ZnO solid solution, associated with the results of XRD and SEM. In addition, the photocatalytic stability of S850 was evaluated by the recycling test, which is important for the long-term application of photocatalytic materials. As shown in Figure 4c, over five consecutive cycles, the catalyst exhibited negligible loss of hydrogen evolution activity.
Photoluminescence spectroscopy was employed for the investigation of the charge separation efficiency of the samples in the process of the photocatalytic reaction. Figure 4d shows that the emission intensity follows the order of S850 < S750 < S950. The sequence is the opposite of the photocatalytic activity order. Owing to this, the fluorescence was produced by recombination of the holes in the valence band (VB) and the electrons in the conduction band (CB), and the most diminished PL intensity of S850 indicates that the recombination of photogenerated charge carriers was maximally retarded [41]. Moreover, the photoelectrochemical measurement further supports the transfer and separation behavior of the photo-induced charge carriers of the samples. As shown in the photocurrent response curves and EIS Nyquist plots in Figure 4e,f, S850 displayed the strongest photocurrent density and the smallest semicircle in comparison with S750 and S950, suggesting the lowest interfacial electron-transfer resistance and the highest photo-induced charge transfer and separation efficiency, which leads to the highest photocatalytic performance.

3.3. The Mechanism of the Photocatalytic Reaction

The electronic band structure of the photocatalyst is inevitably linked with the photocatalytic performance. The electronic band structure of S850 was investigated by the Mott–Schottky relationship, which can be applied to approximately estimate the potential of the CB edge of semiconductors. Figure 5 shows the Mott–Schottky plots measured under various AC frequencies for S850. The Ag/AgCl electrode was used as a reference and the measured potentials are thus relative to the Ag/AgCl electrode. Apparently, the positive slopes of the tangent lines of the Mott–Schottky plots reveal the n-type semiconductor characteristic of GaN:ZnO solid solution [42]. The flat band potential obtained from the Mott–Schottky plots shows a frequency dependency. Theoretically, different frequencies have no effect on the flat band potential of the samples. However, it may be inconsistent because of differences in the properties of the samples, such as the degree of dispersion or the thickness of the drop cast films [43]. Using the popular method [43], it can be determined that the flat band potential of S850 is −1.16 V vs. an Ag/AgCl electrode. For most n-type semiconductors, the bottom of CB is about 0.10~0.30 eV higher than the Fermi level and 0.20 eV was selected for S850. Moreover, an Ag/AgCl electrode vs. an NHE electrode is 0.22 V. In short, the calculated CB edge potential is −1.14 V vs. an NHE electrode. Combined with the band gap value obtained from the UV-visible absorption spectra, the VB position of S850 can be calculated as 1.62 V vs. an NHE electrode. The electronic band structure of S850 is illustrated in Figure 6.
In the process of water splitting for H2 production, in order to ensure the progress of the reaction, three conditions must be satisfied: (1) the band gap of the photocatalyst should be greater than the theoretical decomposition voltage of water (1.23 V); and (2) the potentials of photogenerated electrons and holes must satisfy the requirements for reducing water to H2 and oxidizing to O2, respectively. Specifically, the bottom of CB of the photocatalyst is more negative than the redox potential of H+/H2 (0 V vs. NHE) and the top of VB of the photocatalyst is more positive than the redox potential of O2/H2O (1.23 V vs. NHE). (3) The energy provided by light needs to be greater than the band gap of the photocatalyst. As shown in Figure 6, the top of VB of S850 is positive compared to the redox potential of O2/H2O, and the bottom of CB is negative compared to that of H+/H2. Therefore, the GaN:ZnO solid solution shows efficient performance on photocatalyst water-splitting for H2 production.

4. Conclusions

In summary, a new and simple method for the synthesis of GaN:ZnO solid solution was proposed using the electrospinning technique. The fabricated GaN:ZnO nanorods nitrided at different temperatures exhibited a mesoporous morphology with disparate specific surface areas. By optimizing the nitridation temperatures, a pure wurtzite phase of GaN:ZnO solid solution nanorods was successfully prepared. In comparison with S750 and S950, the S850 photocatalyst showed outstanding performance regarding the water splitting of H2 evolution under visible-light exposure due to the enhanced specific surface area and photo-induced charge carriers’ separation efficiency. The underlying reaction mechanism for the water splitting over GaN:ZnO solid solution nanorod photocatalyst was proposed. It is expected to pave a facile and new pathway for the application of electrospinning-based GaN:ZnO solid solution in the field of energy conversion.

Author Contributions

J.M. and H.Z. contributed equally to this work. Conceptualization, J.M., H.Z. and H.X.; Data curation, J.M. and H.Z.; Formal analysis, J.M. and H.Z.; Funding acquisition, Q.Q. and H.X.; Investigation, J.M. and H.Z.; Methodology, J.M., H.Z. and H.X.; Supervision, L.X. and H.X.; Visualization, J.M. and H.Z.; Writing—original draft, J.M. and H.Z.; Writing—review & editing, X.L., Q.Q., Y.L. and H.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported financially by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC 21875037 and 51502036), National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFB0302303 and 2019YFC1908203).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Wei, Z.D.; Liu, J.Y.; Shangguan, W.F. A review on photocatalysis in antibiotic wastewater: Pollutant degradation and hydrogen production. Chin. J. Catal. 2020, 41, 1440–1450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Fujishima, A.; Honda, K. Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode. Nature 1972, 238, 37–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Qin, Z.Z.; Chen, L.Y.; Ma, R.J.; Tomovska, R.; Luo, X.; Xie, X.L.; Su, T.M.; Ji, H.B. TiO2/BiYO3 composites for enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen production. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 836, 155428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, J.H.; Shen, Y.F.; Liu, S.Q.; Zhang, Y.J. Single 2D mxene precursor-derived TiO2 nanosheets with a uniform decoration of amorphous carbon for enhancing photocatalytic water splitting. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 2020, 270, 118885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fu, B.; Wu, Z.J.; Cao, S.; Guo, K.; Piao, L.Y. Effect of aspect ratios of rutile TiO2 nanorods on overall photocatalytic water splitting performance. Nanoscale 2020, 12, 4895–4902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Miseki, Y.; Sayama, K. Photocatalytic water splitting employing a [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− redox mediator under visible light. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2019, 9, 2019–2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ding, Y.; Wei, D.Q.; He, R.; Yuan, R.S.; Xie, T.F.; Li, Z.H. Rational design of Z-scheme PtS-ZnIn2S4/WO3-MnO2 for overall photo-catalytic water splitting under visible light. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 2019, 258, 117948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. He, C.; Han, F.S.; Zhang, J.H.; Zhang, W.X. The In2SeS/g-C3N4 heterostructure: A new two-dimensional material for photocatalytic water splitting. J. Mater. Chem. C. 2020, 8, 6923–6930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, X.C.; Zhang, Q.; Liang, L.W.; Chen, L.T.; Wang, Y.Y.; Tan, X.Q.; Wen, L.; Huang, H.Y. In situ growing of CoO nanoparticles on g-C3N4 composites with highly improved photocatalytic activity for hydrogen evolution. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2019, 6, 190433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Wang, J.-C.; Hou, Y.X.; Feng, F.-D.; Wang, W.-X.; Shi, W.; Zhang, W.Q.; Li, Y.; Lou, H.H.; Cui, C.-X. A recyclable molten-salt synthesis of B and K co-doped g-C3N4 for photocatalysis of overall water vapor splitting. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 537, 148014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, H.F.; Tan, C.L.; Zhang, K.; Zhao, W.B.; Tian, X.H.; Huang, Y.W. Enhanced photocatalytic performance of ZnO monolayer for water splitting via biaxial strain and external electric field. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 481, 1064–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zheng, X.Z.; Zhang, Z.; Meng, S.G.; Wang, Y.X.; Li, D.Z. Regulating charge transfer over 3D Au/ZnO hybrid inverse opal toward efficiently photocatalytic degradation of bisphenol A and photoelectrochemical water splitting. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 393, 124676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cai, X.F.; Huang, Y.W.; Hu, J.Z.; Zhu, S.W.; Tian, X.H.; Zhang, K.; Ji, G.J.; Zhang, Y.X.; Fu, Z.D.; Tan, C.L. Tuning photocatalytic performance of multilayer ZnO for water splitting by biaxial strain composites. Catalysts 2020, 10, 1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Suzuki, T.M.; Tanaka, H.; Morikawa, T.; Iwaki, M.; Sato, S.; Saeki, S.; Inoue, M.; Kajino, T.; Motohiro, T. Direct assembly synthesis of metal complex–semiconductor hybrid photocatalysts anchored by phosphonate for highly efficient CO2 reduction. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 8673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Yamada, Y.; Miyahigashi, T.; Kotani, H.; Ohkubo, K.; Fukuzumi, S. Photocatalytic hydrogen evolution under highly basic conditions by using ru nanoparticles and 2-phenyl-4-(1-naphthyl)quinolinium ion. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 16136–16145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tschierlei, S.; Karnahl, M.; Presselt, M.; Dietzek, B.; Guthmuller, J.; González, L.; Schmitt, M.; Rau, S.; Popp, J. Photochemical fate: The first step determines efficiency of H2 formation with a supramolecular photocatalyst. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 3981–3984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Xu, Q.L.; Zhang, L.Y.; Yu, J.G.; Wageh, S.; Al-Ghamdi, A.A.; Jaroniec, M. Direct Z-scheme photocatalysts: Principles, synthesis, and applications. Mater. Today 2018, 21, 1042–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fu, J.W.; Yu, J.G.; Jiang, C.J.; Cheng, B. g-C3N4-based heterostructured photocatalysts. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1701503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, B.L.; Wang, J.P.; Gao, Z.F.; Shi, H.; Zou, H.L.; Ariga, K.; Leong, D.T. Ratiometric immunoassays built from synergistic photonic absorption of size-diverse semiconducting MoS2 nanostructures. Mater. Horiz. 2019, 6, 563–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Abeysinghe, D.; Skrabalak, S.E. Toward shape-controlled metal oxynitride and nitride particles for solar energy applications. ACS Energy Lett. 2018, 3, 1331–1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Maeda, K.; Takata, T.; Hara, M.; Saito, N.; Inoue, Y.; Kobayashi, H.; Domen, K. GaN:ZnO solid solution as a photocatalyst for visible-light-driven overall water splitting. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 8286–8287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Li, J.; Yang, W.K.; Wu, A.M.; Zhang, X.L.; Xu, T.T.; Liu, B.D. Band-gap tunable 2D hexagonal (GaN)1–x(ZnO)x solid-solution nanosheets for photocatalytic water splitting. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 8583–8591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Wang, J.P.; Huang, B.B.; Wang, Z.Y.; Wang, P.; Cheng, H.F.; Zheng, Z.K.; Qin, X.Y.; Zhang, X.Y.; Dai, Y.; Whangbo, M.-H. Facile synthesis of Zn-rich (GaN)1−x(ZnO)x solid solutions using layered double hydroxides as precursors. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 4562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Maeda, K.; Domen, K. Solid solution of GaN and ZnO as a stable photocatalyst for overall water splitting under visible light. Chem. Mater. 2010, 22, 612–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Asakura, Y.; Nishimura, Y.; Masubuchi, Y.; Yin, S. Utility of ZnGa2O4 nanoparticles obtained hydrothermally for preparation of GaN:ZnO solid solution nanoparticles and transparent films. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2019, 2019, 1999–2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Li, Z.; Qi, Y.; Wang, W.Y.; Li, D.; Li, Z.; Xiao, Y.N.; Han, G.Y.; Shen, J.-R.; Li, C. Blocking backward reaction on hydrogen evolution cocatalyst in a photosystem II hybrid Z-scheme water splitting system. Chin. J. Catal. 2019, 40, 486–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liu, Q.Q.; Huang, J.X.; Tang, H.; Yu, X.H.; Shen, J. Construction 0D TiO2 nanoparticles/2D CoP nanosheets heterojunctions for enhanced photocatalytic H2 evolution activity. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2020, 56, 196–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mu, L.C.; Zhang, Q.; Tao, X.P.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, S.Y.; Cui, J.Y.; Fan, F.T.; Li, C. Photo-induced self-formation of dual-cocatalysts on semiconductor surface. Chin. J. Catal. 2018, 39, 1730–1735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Phivilay, S.P.; Roberts, C.A.; Gamalski, A.D.; Stach, E.A.; Zhang, S.; Nguyen, L.; Tang, Y.; Xiong, A.; Puretzky, A.A.; Tao, F.F.; et al. Anatomy of a visible light activated photocatalyst for water splitting. ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 6650–6658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chen, L.H.; Chen, R.; Hu, H.F.; Li, G.H. Enhancement of photocatalytic hydrogen production of semiconductor by plasmonic silver nanocubes under visible light. Mater. Lett. 2019, 242, 47–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kosem, N.; Honda, Y.; Watanabe, M.; Takagaki, A.; Tehrani, Z.P.; Haydous, F.; Lippert, T.; Ishihara, T. Photobiocatalytic H2 evolution of GaN:ZnO and [FeFe]-hydrogenase recombinant escherichia coli. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2020, 10, 4042–4052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Maeda, K.; Teramura, K.; Lu, D.; Takata, T.; Saito, N.; Inoue, Y.; Domen, K. Photocatalyst releasing hydrogen from water. Nature 2006, 440, 295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hagiwara, H.; Kakigi, R.; Takechi, S.; Watanabe, M.; Hinokuma, S.; Ida, S.; Ishihara, T. Effects of preparation condition on the photocatalytic activity of porphyrin-modified GaN:ZnO for water splitting. Surf. Coat. Tech. 2017, 324, 601–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Pant, B.; Park, M.; Park, S.-J. Drug delivery applications of core-sheath nanofibers prepared by coaxial electrospinning: A review. Pharmaceutics 2019, 11, 305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Zhao, K.; Kang, S.-X.; Yang, Y.-Y.; Yu, D.-G. Electrospun functional nanofiber membrane for antibiotic removal in water: Review. Polymers 2021, 13, 226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Zou, X.X.; Yang, Y.L.; Chen, H.J.; Shi, X.L.; Suo, G.Q.; Ye, X.H.; Zhang, L.; Hou, X.J.; Feng, L.; Chen, Z.-G. Tuning wall thickness of TiO2 microtubes for an enhanced photocatalytic activity with thickness-dependent charge separation efficiency. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2020, 579, 463–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Cheng, J.; Wang, Y.T.; Xing, Y.; Shahid, M.; Pan, W. Surface defects decorated zinc doped gallium oxynitride nanowires with high photocatalytic activity. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 2017, 209, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, X.H.; Shao, C.L.; Wang, D.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, P.; Liu, Y.C. Low temperature preparation and characterization of (Ga1−xZnx)(N1−yOy) alloy nanostructures using electrospun nanofibers as source materials. Ceram. Int. 2014, 40, 3425–3431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Masubuchi, Y.; Yamaoka, R.; Tohei, T.; Mizoguchi, T.; Ikuhara, Y.; Kikkawa, S. Nanowire of hexagonal gallium oxynitride: Direct observation of its stacking disorder and its long nanowire growth. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2012, 32, 1989–1993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Miyaake, A.; Masubuchi, Y.; Takeda, T.; Motohashi, T.; Kikkawa, S. Preparation of gallium oxynitride powder and its nanofibers by the nitridation of a gallium oxide precursor doped with nickel or cobalt obtained via the citrate route. Dalton Trans. 2010, 39, 6106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Luo, Y.J.; Wang, K.C.; Qian, Q.R.; Zheng, W.W.; Xue, H.; Huang, B.Q.; Xiao, L.R.; Chen, Q.H. Fabrication and photocatalytic properties of Gd-doped ZnO nanoparticle-assembled nanorods. Mater. Lett. 2015, 149, 70–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gelderman, K.; Lee, L.; Donne, S.W. Flat-band potential of a semiconductor: Using the mott–schottky equation. J. Chem. Educ. 2007, 84, 685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Park, H.S.; Kweon, K.E.; Ye, H.; Paek, E.; Hwang, G.S.; Bard, A.J. Factors in the metal doping of BiVO4 for improved photoelectrocatalytic activity as studied by scanning electrochemical microscopy and first-principles density-functional calculation. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 17870–17879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Applsci 11 10854 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) XRD patterns; (b) UV-visible absorption spectra of the S750, S850, and S950 samples; (c) adsorption-desorption isotherms; and (d) pore size distribution of GaN:ZnO solid solution.
Figure 1. (a) XRD patterns; (b) UV-visible absorption spectra of the S750, S850, and S950 samples; (c) adsorption-desorption isotherms; and (d) pore size distribution of GaN:ZnO solid solution.
Applsci 11 10854 g001
Applsci 11 10854 g002a 550Applsci 11 10854 g002b 550
Figure 2. SEM images of (a) as-spun nanofibers, (b) S750, (c) S850, and (d) S950 and (e) the EDS spectrum of S850.
Figure 2. SEM images of (a) as-spun nanofibers, (b) S750, (c) S850, and (d) S950 and (e) the EDS spectrum of S850.
Applsci 11 10854 g002aApplsci 11 10854 g002b
Applsci 11 10854 g003 550
Figure 3. (a,b) TEM and (c,d) HRTEM images of S850.
Figure 3. (a,b) TEM and (c,d) HRTEM images of S850.
Applsci 11 10854 g003
Applsci 11 10854 g004a 550Applsci 11 10854 g004b 550
Figure 4. (a) Photocatalytic H2 evolution and (b) H2 evolution rates of Rh2−yCryO3-loaded GaN:ZnO solid solution, (c) cycle stability of Rh2-yCryO3-loaded S850, (d) photoluminescence spectra, (e) transient photocurrent, and (f) EIS Nyquist plots of S750, S850, and S950 samples.
Figure 4. (a) Photocatalytic H2 evolution and (b) H2 evolution rates of Rh2−yCryO3-loaded GaN:ZnO solid solution, (c) cycle stability of Rh2-yCryO3-loaded S850, (d) photoluminescence spectra, (e) transient photocurrent, and (f) EIS Nyquist plots of S750, S850, and S950 samples.
Applsci 11 10854 g004aApplsci 11 10854 g004b
Applsci 11 10854 g005 550
Figure 5. Mott–Schottky plots of S850. Electrolyte: 0.2 M Na2SO4. The different AC frequencies were used for the measurements: 1500, 2000, and 2500 Hz. Tangent lines of the Mott–Schottky plots were drawn to obtain the flat band potential.
Figure 5. Mott–Schottky plots of S850. Electrolyte: 0.2 M Na2SO4. The different AC frequencies were used for the measurements: 1500, 2000, and 2500 Hz. Tangent lines of the Mott–Schottky plots were drawn to obtain the flat band potential.
Applsci 11 10854 g005
Applsci 11 10854 g006 550
Figure 6. A schematic illustration of the electronic band structure and the photocatalytic H2 generation mechanism of GaN:ZnO solid solution.
Figure 6. A schematic illustration of the electronic band structure and the photocatalytic H2 generation mechanism of GaN:ZnO solid solution.
Applsci 11 10854 g006
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mao, J.; Zhong, H.; Liu, X.; Qian, Q.; Luo, Y.; Xiao, L.; Xue, H. Electrospinning Preparation of GaN:ZnO Solid Solution Nanorods with Visible-Light-Driven Photocatalytic Activity toward H2 Production. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 10854. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112210854

AMA Style

Mao J, Zhong H, Liu X, Qian Q, Luo Y, Xiao L, Xue H. Electrospinning Preparation of GaN:ZnO Solid Solution Nanorods with Visible-Light-Driven Photocatalytic Activity toward H2 Production. Applied Sciences. 2021; 11(22):10854. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112210854

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mao, Jingyun, Huiling Zhong, Xinpin Liu, Qingrong Qian, Yongjin Luo, Liren Xiao, and Hun Xue. 2021. "Electrospinning Preparation of GaN:ZnO Solid Solution Nanorods with Visible-Light-Driven Photocatalytic Activity toward H2 Production" Applied Sciences 11, no. 22: 10854. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112210854

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop