Next Article in Journal
Selected Aspects of Designing Modular PEMFC Stacks as Power Sources for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
Previous Article in Journal
Numerical Design and Laboratory Testing of Encapsulated PCM Panels for PCM-Air Heat Exchangers
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Effect of Biopreparations and Biostimulants on the Chemical Composition and Microorganisms Associated with Verticillium Wilt of Horseradish Roots (Armoracia rusticana Gaertn.)

by
Katarzyna Gleń-Karolczyk
1,*,
Elżbieta Boligłowa
1,
Agnieszka Filipiak-Florkiewicz
2,
Adam Florkiewicz
3 and
Lidia Luty
4
1
Department of Microbiology and Biomonitoring, Faculty of Agriculture and Economics, University of Agriculture in Kraków, Mickiewicza 21, 31-120 Kraków, Poland
2
Department of Plant Products Technology and Nutrition Hygiene, University of Agriculture in Kraków, 122 Balicka, 30-149 Kraków, Poland
3
Department of Food Analysis and Quality Assessment, University of Agriculture in Kraków, 122 Balicka, 30-149 Kraków, Poland
4
Department of Statistics and Econometrics, University of Agriculture in Kraków, Al. Mickiewicza 21, 31-120 Kraków, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(2), 680; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11020680
Submission received: 24 November 2020 / Revised: 29 December 2020 / Accepted: 8 January 2021 / Published: 12 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Effective Microorganisms in Food Processing)

Abstract

:
The basic foundation of plant production consists in plant protection treatments, which largely shape the quality of plant raw material intended for the food industry. Due to its long growing season, horseradish requires more treatments than average. Intensive protection based on synthetic pesticides favours the accumulation of their residues in plants and generates serious environmental problems. We have examined the effect of chemical protection and its reduced variant as well as three variants of biological protection, differentiated in terms of preparations used for seedlings treatment (Pythium oligandrum, Bacillus subtilis, and Ecklonia maxima), on the content of dry matter, protein, fat, carbohydrates, and the disease severity index (DSI) of Verticillium wilt of horseradish roots. The quantitative and qualitative changes in the microorganism communities associated with this disease were determined. Thirty-four species of fungi and Globisporangium irregulare have been shown to contribute to the pathogenesis of Verticillium wilt. The following were found with the highest frequency: Verticillium dahliae (14.37%), G. irregulare (6.87%), Ilyonectria destructans (6.73%), Fusarium acuminatum (6.53%), Rhisoctonia solani (6.75%), Epicoccum nigrum (5.56%), and Alternaria brassicae (5.36%).We found that water deficit promotes the increase of DSI and reduces the number and richness of fungal species isolated from diseased roots. The variant of biological protection with treatment of seedlings of E. maxima extract and with reduced chemical protectionin dry seasons give the best protective effects. Under conditions of optimal water supply, biological protection (P. oligandrum) is more effective than chemical protection. Biological protection increases biodiversity in the population of microorganisms that contribute to blackening of the conductive bundles of horseradish roots. There is a significant negative correlation between the number of isolated microorganisms and the DSI value. Increasing the number of the CFUs is accompanied by a reduction in the symptoms of Verticillium wilt of horseradish roots. Biological protection in years with sufficient water supply results in a significant increase in the content of dry matter, protein, and carbohydrates in horseradish roots. Under the influence of protective treatments, the ash content in the roots and its alkalinity decrease.

1. Introduction

Known in the past under a variety of names—Sinapi persicum, Raphanus vulgaris, Raphanus rusticanus, and Cochlearia armoracia—the horseradish (Armoracia rusticana Gaertn.) is a perennial plant belonging to the Brassicaceae family, native to the Mediterranean [1,2]. For centuries, it has been a valued medicinal plant, used as a condiment and known as a natural cosmetic and food preservative [3], even though it was introduced into cultivation as late as the end of the eighteenth century. Today, horseradish is grown commercially in all parts of the world. In Europe, the main production is concentrated in Hungary, Austria, Germany, and Poland [4], whereas the worldwide leadership in horseradish cultivation belongs to the United States, with over 50% of the plantations located in the state of Illinois [2,5]. In Poland, horseradish has been cultivated continuously since 1939, mostly in the south-western part of the Lodz region.
Due to their nutritional value, horseradish roots provide a valuable raw material for the food industry. They constitute a rich source of fibre, mineral salts, calcium, potassium, magnesium, sulphur, sodium, iron, zinc, phosphorus, iodine, vitamins C, B1, B2, provitamin A, as well as flavonoids, sugars, enzymes, and amino acids [6,7,8,9]. In addition, they contain bioactive ingredients who serichness in glucosinolates (being a source of isothiocyanates that have a wide range of medical applications) is particularly appreciated [10,11]. Among others, isothiocyanates have bactericidal and anti-inflammatory properties, and they inhibit the development of colon, stomach, and lung cancer [12,13,14,15]. Horseradish peroxidase is used in clinical trials and immunological tests [16,17,18].
In light of the above, plantations must be managed to ensure the highest quality of the roots [19]. The food industry uses roots that are smooth, with light skin, free from defects such as cracks, deformations, or damage caused by pests, and last but not least, free from internal discoloration. Meanwhile, the lengthy period of this plant’s vegetation certainly favours infection by pathogens and possible damage by insects [2,20,21]. It is estimated that during the growing season horseradish is attacked by about 22 species of pests, some of them occurring in several generations. In turn, the most common infectious diseases in horseradish plantations are white rust (Albugo candida), Cercospora leaf spot of crucifers (Cercospora armoraciae), Phoma leaf spot (Leptosphaeria maculans), Cylindrosporium disease (Cylindrosporium concentricum), and Alternaria Black spot (Alternaria brassicae, A.brassicicola, A.alternata) [2,20,22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. In all climate zones, an important pathogen limiting the yield and quality of horseradish roots is the genus Verticillium [21,28,29,30,31,32]. The dominant species is V. dahliae Kleb. In the United States, the latter is considered the main causeof internal discoloration of horseradish roots, and the disease itself is referred to as “internally discoloured horseradish roots” [28]. In Poland, however, this disease is known as Verticillium wilt (annular, or ring-shaped, blackening of horseradish roots).
The guarantee of maintaining good quality and high yields comes from, inter alia, controlling the severity of infectious diseases during the growing season. In the conventional cultivation system, synthetic fungicides are commonly used for seedling treatment and foliar application, although their effectiveness is not always satisfactory [19,20]. The negative effect of the use of chemical plant protection products is that, in addition to pests, they eliminate beneficial organisms from the environment, they decrease the soil biological activity, and may often cause resistance in pests [33,34]. A global problem is the loss of soil biodiversity, which, according to the latest reports, contributes to the health of plants, animals, and humans [35,36,37,38,39]. The restoration of biodiversity is the basis of ecological and integrated programs implemented as part of sustainable agricultural development. Organic fertilization is an essential factor in restoring the balance within ecosystems [40,41,42,43]. It has been proven that biostimulants also have a similar effect. Brown algae extracts restore the relative balance in the soil—the balance between groups of parasitic, saprotrophic, and antagonistic microorganisms—which contributes to betterplant health [44]. Thus, thanks to brown algae, the use of synthetic fungicides against Botrytis cinerea can be reduced by as much as 80% [45].
What is more, replacing chemical protection with biological preparations makes it possible to avoid negative consequences for the environment and ecology. In the fight against pathogens, non-pathogenic bacteria are used: Bacillus subtilis strain QST 713, Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis (serotype H-2014) strain AM65–52, Pseudomonas chlororaphis strain MA342, Streptomyces griseoviridis K61, as well as fungi: Trichoderma, Gliocladium, Fusarium, and OomycetesPythium oligandrum strainM1, [46,47,48,49,50]. A small number of studies conducted on other plant species show that biological control agents (BCAs) and natural biostimulants or plant growth promoters (PGPs) significantly modify the content of nutrients and bioactive substances in plant raw materials [51,52].
So far, it has not been investigated whether and to what extent biological protection treatments, and the inclusion of biopreparations and biostimulants to reduce the amount of synthetic pesticides used, translate into variability in the communities of microorganisms associated with Verticillium wilt of horseradish roots. This gap is filled by the study presented in this paper, undertaken with the following objectives: (I) to understand the communities of microorganisms associated with Verticillium wilt of horseradish roots; (II) to assess the impact of protective measures on the quantitative and qualitative composition of the communities of microorganisms participating in the epidemiology of this disease; (III) to assess the relationship between the number of these communities and the intensity of Verticillium wilt of horseradish roots; (IV) to determine the optimal protective treatments that would allow horseradish roots with the best quality and nutritional value indicators to be obtained. Therefore, in the present study, we have performed a comparative assessment of chemical protection, its reduced variant and three variants of biological protection with the participation of BCAs (Pythium oligandrum oospores and Bacillus subtilis) and PGPs (Ecklonia maxima extract and a mixture of three nitrophenolic compounds), for the content of dry matter, protein, fat, carbohydrates, and ash in horseradish roots.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material and Design of the Field Experiment

The study material consisted of roots of horseradish (Armoracia rusticana Gaertn.) of the Polish variety Alpo that were collected annually in the third decade of October from a field experiment carried out in 2015–2017 in Siemkowice (51°12.1164′ N; 18°53.928′ E) in the Łódź region of Poland.
The field experiment was carried out on podzolic soil composed of light, highly sandy clay with a fine sand grain size composition, classified as IVb, with good rye agricultural suitability complex [53,54]. The soil was acidic (pH = 5.79) and had low humus content (1.57%). The topsoil was rich in potassium, but there were deficiencies of other macroelements and micronutrients such as Cu, Zn, and B, as well as excessive iron content. The content of heavy metals did not exceed the permissible standards.
A single-factor experiment was established using the randomized block method in four replications. This design provided six combinations of plant protection (24 plots in total).The size of the plot for observation and harvest was 20 m2 (total working area of 480 m2). Each year, the forecrop for horseradish was spring barley. For winter ploughing, a full dose of cattle manure of 35 t⋅ha−1 and mineral fertilizers were brought in, in doses determined based on plant requirements and soil analyses for the content of available forms of the nutrients. In autumn, 400 kg·ha−1 of triple granular superphosphate (46% P2O5) and 300 kg·ha−1 of potassium salt (60% K2O) were used. In spring, 150 kg·ha−1 of Polidap NP (S) fertilizer (18% N, 46% P2O5, 5% SO3) was sown, and at the end of June, calcium nitrate with boron was added (15.4% N, 19% Ca, 0.3% B) in the amount of 200 kg·ha−1. The deficiencies of copper, zinc, and boron were also supplemented by introducing 60 kg·ha−1 copper sulphate, 40 kg·ha−1 zinc sulphate, and 10 kg·ha−1 borax. Horseradish seedlings, 30–35 cm long, were planted in the second decade of March, in rows with a spacing of 62.5 cm × 30 cm (planting density of 80 thousand seedlings per ha−1).

2.2. Protection Treatments

The research factor was protection against infectious diseases, which included horseradish seedling treatment before planting and foliar application of preparations.Due to the high risk of insect infestation, it was also necessary to activate pest control. During the growing season, the horseradish was protected according to the scheme presented in Table 1. The control of weeds throughout the entire experiment was conducted mechanically. The following agents were used in the experiment: chemical, biological, as well as biostimulants included in the list below.
Fungicides: Topsin M 500 SC—Thiophanate-methyl—500 g⋅l−1(Nippon Soda Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan); Dithane Neo Tec 75 WG—Mancozeb: a complex of zinc with polymeric manganese ethylene bis (dithiocarbamate), 20% manganese and 2.5% zinc—750 g⋅kg−1(Endophile Industries Limited, Mumbai, Republic of India); Amistar Opti 480 SC—chlorothalonil—400 g⋅l−1, azoxystrobin—80 g⋅l−1(Syngenta Limited, Great Britain and Northern Ireland); Ridomil Gold MZ Pepite 67.8 WG—metalaxyl-M—38.8 g⋅kg−1, mancozeb—640 g⋅kg−1(Syngenta Polska Sp.z o.o., Warsaw, Poland).
Insecticides: Nurelle D 550 WG—chlorpyrifos—550 g⋅l−1; cypermethrin 50 g⋅l−1(Arysta Life Science Polska Sp. z o.o., Warsaw, Poland); Decis Mega 50 EW—deltamethrin 50 g⋅l−1(Bayer SAS, Lyon, France); Proteus 110 OD—thiacloprid—100 g⋅l−1, deltamethrin—10 g⋅l−1(Bayer Sp.z o.o., Warsaw, Poland); Sumi—Alpha 050 EC—esfenvalerate—50 g⋅l−1(Arysta LifeScience Polska Sp.z o.o., Warsaw, Poland); Bulldock 025 EC—beta-cyfluthrin—25 g⋅l−1(Nufarm Polska Sp.z o.o., Warsaw, Poland).
Biological control agents (BCAs): Polyversum WP—106 Pythium oligandrum oospores per 1 g of the agent (Biopreparaty Ltd., Uherce, Czech Republic); Serenade ASO—Bacillus subtillis str. QST 713—13.96 g⋅l−1(minimum concentration 1.042⋅1012 CFU·l−1) (Bayer AG, Leverkusen, Germany); Dipel® WG—Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki p. ABTS 351—540 g⋅kg−1(Sumitomo Chemical Agro Europe S.A.S., French Republic).
Biotechnological plant protection product: SpinTor 240 SC—spinosad: Spinozyn A, Spinozyn D (a substance from the group of macrocyclic lactones)—240 g⋅l−1(Dow AgroSciences Polska Sp.z o.o., Warsaw, Poland).
Biostimulants (PGPs): Kelpak SL—auxins—11.0 mg⋅l−1 and cytokinins—0.031 mg⋅l−1 obtained from Ecklonia maxima algae (Kelp Products International (Pty) Ltd., Simon’s Town, South Africa); Asahi SL—nitrophenols naturally occurring in plants—sodium para-nitrophenolate—3 g⋅l−1, sodium ortho-nitrophenolate—2 g⋅l−1, sodium 5-nitroguajacolate—1 g⋅l−1(ArystaLifeScience Ltd., Praha, Czech Republic).

2.3. Assessment of the Prevalence of Verticillium Wilt of Horseradish Roots

Horseradish roots were harvested in the third decade of October. Fifty pieces of main roots were taken from each plot, they were washed under running water, and the percentage of roots showing the symptoms of Verticillium wilt of horseradish roots was assessed. For this purpose, the roots were cut crosswise at a distance of 4 cm from the rosette (crown of the root). As there isno approved scale for the infection assessment for horseradish roots, analogous to the EPPO standard PP 1/78 (3), a four-point scale of the percentage infestation of the surface of vascular bundles in the cross-section was adopted.
According to thatscale, 0—signifies no disease symptoms, 1—signifies 1%–25% of the area of the ring of vascular bundles in a discolouredroot, 2—(26%–50%), and 3—(51%–100%), respectively.
The severity of the disease was expressed by the disease severity index (DSI) index (%), calculated according to the Townsend and Heuberger formula [55]:
DSI % = 0 i ( n · v ) i · N · 100
where DSI—disease severity index; n—number of plants at a given degree of infestation; v—degree of infestation, i—the highest degree of infestation; N—total number of analysed plants.

2.4. Isolating and Identifying the Fungi from the Roots Infected Internally

The main roots of horseradish with visible internal discoloration of the vascular bundles were included in the mycological analysis. The material for isolation was collected immediately after health assessment. In accordance with the adopted phytopathological procedure, 30 roots with the strongest symptoms of Verticillium wilt of horseradish roots and with even thickness (diameter approx. 2 cm) were taken from each combination. The root was cut lengthwise, and then one 1-milimeter-thick half-slice (disc) was cut transversely, thus obtaining a total of 60 half-discs. Section 2 and Section 3 mm in size were cut from the border of healthy and diseased tissue. From each combination of sections, 200 were prepared, which weighed 5 g. Then, they were disinfected for 30 s in 0.5% sodium hypochlorite (Javal, Warszawa, Poland). The root fragments were rinsed three times for 10 min in sterile distilled water and thoroughly dried on sterile gauze. Then, 10 pieces at a time, they were placed on solidified PDA (potato dextrose agar) medium with 0.05 g·l−1 chloramphenicol and pH 6.5 in Petri dishes with a diameter of 150 mm. The fungi were grown in an air-conditioned chamber for up to 10 days, at a temperature of 23 °C and a 12-h light cycle. The number of obtained isolates was counted, which corresponded to the number of colony forming units (CFU) per 5 g of diseased horseradish roots. The fungal cultures were transported onto PDA and water agar (WA) medium. The filamentous fungi were identified using the MALDI-TOF MS technique (matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry), which uses mass spectroscopy to determine ribosome protein profiles. Reference spectra for these are stored in the library database of Bruker Daltonik GmbH [56].
The cultivation and sample preparation of the filamentous fungi was performed according to the standard operating procedure developed by BrukerDaltonik GmbH. Tubes of 8 mL Modified Fluid Medium cat. no. 221014 (Becton Dickinson) were inoculated with a small amount of three-day-old fungal hyphae and sealed with a lid. They were then placed in an SB2 rotator (cat. no. Y552, Carl Roth GmbH & Co KG) and incubated in the top mix until sufficient biological material was acquired. A detailed methodology for obtaining supernatants (crude protein extract) from the fungi is presented in the work of Gleń-Karolczyk et al. [42].
Then, 1 µL of supernatant was pipetted onto a steel MALDI plate and allowed to dry at room temperature. Subsequently, 1 µL of the alpha-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid solution—HCCA matrix (cat. no. 8255344)—was applied and allowed to dry at room temperature. The plate was inserted into a MALDI Biotyper microflex apparatus, linked via computer to a database of reference spectra for fungi contained in Filamentous Fungi Library 1.0 (BrukerDaltonik GmbH). The spot on the plate where the strains had beenlocated was marked, given a number, and the identification was started via the “start” table. Fungi identification was conducted using MBT Compass research use only (RUO) 4.1.60 software. Each isolate was identified twice.

2.5. Chemical Analyses

Material for chemical analysis was collected from the parts of the roots on which the health assessment was performed. The content of dry matter was determined using gravimetric methods according to standard PN-ISO 712:2002 and expressed in g per 100 g; the content of protein was determined using the Dumas method (TruSpec, Leco) according to PN-EN ISO 16634-1:2008 (nitrogen to protein conversion factors: 5.9); fat content, by extraction method in overcritical CO2 state (TFE 2000, Leco); ash content, by burning in a muffle furnace (Nabertherm model LE6/11/B150) according to PN-ISO 2171:1994; alkalinity of ash was determined according to PN-A-75101/08: 1990 (expressed in ml of 0.1 M HCl per 100 g dry matter of sample).
The accuracy of methods used was verified on the basis of certified reference material NCS ZC73012—GSB-5. All the methods used were fully validated and checked using internal quality control procedures.
The amount of carbohydrates was calculated according to Kunachowicz et al. [57].

2.6. Developing the Results

2.6.1. Descriptive Statistics

The microorganisms colonizing the infected roots in particular combinations of the experiment were characterized using the following population parameters:
The frequency of occurrence of particular species C = a/b·100%
where: a—the number of occurrences of a given species; b—the number of all isolates (100%).
Based on the above, the fungi were assigned to frequency groups: eudominants—above 10.0% of the total isolated fungi; dominants—5.1–10.0%; subdominants—2.1–5.0%; recedents—1.1–2.0%; and subreferences below 1.0% [58]. Moreover, the species richness index (S), which represents the total number of species in the sample, was used [59].

2.6.2. Statistical Analysis

Using a Statistica 13.1 PL software package, the results concerning the occurrence of Verticillium wilt of horseradish roots were subjected to a two-way ANOVA analysis (factor I being the year of cultivation and factor II the protection treatment). Homogeneous groups were determined using Tukey’s test, and the significance level was assumed to be 0.05. To determine the relationship between the intensity of Verticillium wilt of horseradish root (DSI) and the number of colony forming units (CFU) per 5 g of infected roots or the annual sum of precipitation (SP), Pearson correlation coefficients (r) and regression equations were used. The correlation analysis was also used to determine the relationship between the prevalence of dominant species in communities of microorganisms isolated from horseradish roots.
On the other hand, the results concerning the chemical composition were presented as the mean value ± SD. They were subjected to a two-way ANOVA analysis. Duncan’s post hoc test was applied. Differences were considered significant at p < 0.05. The calculations were performed with the statistical software package Statistica 9.1 (StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA).

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Verticillium Wilt of Horseradish Roots Depending on the Studied Factors

Root diseases, in contrast to those occurring on leaves, directly affect the commercial value of horseradish, therefore, they pose a greater problem for agricultural producers. Fruit and vegetable processing plants, which in 90% are direct recipients of raw material from farmers, set requirements regarding horseradish root quality. Roots intended for the food industry should have smooth, light skin, and they should be free from defects such as cracks, deformation, or damage caused by pests, and internal discoloration is not tolerated either.
A three-year study showed that horseradish cultivation in Poland is endangered by Verticillium wilt of horseradish roots. The intensity of this disease depends significantly on the conditions prevalent in a given growing year or season.
Weather conditions in the years of the study were varied (Table 2). They are described using the Sielianinov (K) hydrothermal index:
K = p 0 , 1 · t
where: p—precipitation total for the examined period (mm); t—mean daily air temperature (°C).
Of the seasons covered by the study, 2015 was the driest year (see Table 2). As little as 311.9 mm of rainfall was recorded from March to October. In the first growing season (April–June), precipitation totaled 127.6 mm, and in the second (July–September), it amounted to 118.8 mm. In turn, the year 2016 can be considered optimal in terms of water supply (493.7 mm) and covering the needs of horseradish plants. However, after a very humid July, there was a significant deficit of rainfall in August and September, followed by excess precipitation in October. The study period from March to October 2017 was humid (682.7 mm of precipitation) and warm. In the period April–June, total precipitation was 243.6 mm, and in July–September, it totaled 300.0 mm. This means that the horseradish plants were sufficiently supplied with moisture.
The organisms responsible for the development of Verticillium wilt attack the roots with more intensity during drought periods, while the temperature seems to be a factor of lesser importance. The total precipitation of 682.7 mm in 2017 resulted in a significant reduction of discoloration within the vascular bundles (Figure 1). In turn, a decrease in the amount of precipitation by 189 mm in 2016 resulted in a significant increase in the disease severity index (DSI). On the other hand, the significant water deficit (311.9 mm) in the first year of the study contributed to the increase in the DSI. As the disease symptoms intensify, darkening of the tissues of the core (on the inside) and the cortex (on the outside) is observed. Internal discoloration of the roots significantly reduces the commercial yield, often completely (100%) disqualifying them from being used for processing [32].
In the opinion of Babadoost et al. [31], insufficient information on the etiology of this disease is the main reason for the lack of effective preparations to combat it. Although seedling treatment appears to be the first and best choice when it comes to protection against soil pathogens, there is also a marked lack of research in this field in the literature on the subject.
The weather conditions in the growing season strongly determined the severity of the disease and the effectiveness of the protection treatments. The interaction between the years and protection treatments turned out to be significant (Figure 1).
It was demonstrated that in the growing season (2017) with generally the lowest DSI, the applied protection treatments, except for BPEm, protected the horseradish roots against Verticillium wilt to equal extent. On the other hand, in 2015, a year characterized as dry and warm, the most intensive development of the disease was recorded, whereas there was no protective activity in BPBs and BPPo plots. In particular, it was the water deficit, persisting after planting horseradish seedlings and for the next two months, that contributed to this (Table 2). In the conditions of soil drought, the BCA (B. subtilis and P. oligandrum) did not protect the roots against pathogens causing Verticillium wilt of internal roots. The study showed that in such conditions, the best protective effect against Verticillium wilt of horseradish roots was achieved in the BPEm plot, where seedling treatment with E. maxima extract was supported by additional foliar application of biostimulants and biopreparations (Figure 1). It is worth noting that in 2015 also the option of protecting with a reduced amount of chemicals (RChP) protected against Verticillium wilt of horseradish roots significantly more effectively than the ChP. Therefore, in horseradish cultivation, there is a chance to minimize the number of treatments performed with synthetic fungicides without reducing the effectiveness of root protection. Gleń-Karolczyk [61] points out that periods of extreme drought have become a dire problem for horseradish growers in Poland in recent years. Thus, it is reasonable to use the E. maxima-based biostimulant for horseradish seedling treatment and foliar application. The auxins and cytokines contained therein alleviate the stress associated with water deficit and promote the health of the roots [60]. In vitro studies also confirm the fungistatic effect of this biostimulant [21].

3.2. Microorganisms Related to Verticillium Wilt of Horseradish Roots

3.2.1. Quantitative Analysis of Microorganisms Colonizing Horseradish Roots Affected by Verticillium Wilt

The number of isolates obtained from internally infected horseradish roots varied according to the growing seasons. In the first year of the study (2015), the most intensive development of Verticillium wilt of horseradish roots (Figure 1) was represented by the smallest number of isolated microorganisms (Figure 2). In the following years (which were wetter), with lesser disease severity, the number increased. As the material collected for microbiological analysis was carefully weighed and cut into small pieces, it can be concluded that the number of isolates obtained corresponded to the number of colony-forming units (CFU) per 5 g of a diseased root. In this approach, on average, the highest amount of CFU in 5 g was found in infected roots from the 2017 growing season and the lowest in those from 2015.
It was shown that in the plots where seedlings were treated with PGP (E. maxima) and BCA (P. oligandrum, B. subtilis), more CFUs were isolated from 5 g of roots that were showing the symptoms of the disease than in those treated with the ChP, RChP, or in the control group. At the same time, a significant correlation was found between CFU and the intensity of Verticillium wilt of horseradish roots from the plots where the seedlings were treated with P. oligandrum, B.subtilis, and thiophanate methyl before planting (Table 3). The data do not support the conclusion that there is a correlation between CFU and DSI in the plots where seedlings were treated with E. maxima extract and the control plot.
For all protective treatments, the coefficients of the linear regression equations of the intensity of the DSI of Verticillium wilt of horseradish roots from the sum of atmospheric precipitation during the growing season (SP) are statistically significant (Table 3). As the amount of rainfall increases, the DSI value decreases. For the BPEm treatment, an increase in precipitation by 1 mm causes the smallest (0.024 pp) reduction in the severity of this disease. In this combination, no statistically significant relationship was found between DSI Verticillium wilt of horseradish roots and CFUs. These relationships were statistically significant with respect to the remaining treatments. For ChP, an increase in CFU by one unit causes a DSI decrease of 0.307 pp. There was a significant positive correlation between the amount of precipitation during the growing season and CFUs.

3.2.2. Qualitative Analysis of Microorganisms Colonizing Horseradish Roots Affected by Verticillium Wilt

In the course of the pathogenesis of Verticillium wilt of horseradish root, the species composition, frequency, and biodiversity of the microorganisms involved are important. During the three-year study; 3508 isolates were isolated from horseradish roots with clear symptoms of the disease (Table 4).
Of these, 90.91%, that is 3189 species, were fungi, and 6.87% were Globisporangium irregulare (241 isolates), which was the only representative of Oomycota. The isolated fungi belonged to 34 species and represented 21 genera within the clusters Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, and Zygomycota. At the same time, the 17 genera belonging to Ascomycota accounted for 82.16% of the total isolated fungi. Only one species—V. dahliae—was determined as eudominant, with a 14.37% share. The group of dominants, constituting a share of 37.80% of the total number of isolated microorganisms, included, in decreasing order (in terms of percentage), G. irregulare (6.87%), R. solani (6.75%), Ilyonectria destructans (syn. Cylindrocarpon destructans) (6.73%), Fusarium acuminatum (6.53%), Epicoccum nigrum (5.56%), and A. brassicae (5.36%). The subdominant group had a share of 28.06% and comprised 11 species, of which 6 belonged to the genus Fusarium: F. acuminatum—6.53%, F. proliferatum—3.96%, F. equiseti—3.33%, F. solani—3.25%, F. avenaceum—2.68%, F. incarnatum—2.19%, A. alternate—2.85%, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum—2.60%, Penicillium expansum—2.56%, and Colletotrichum acutatum—2.45%. The complex nature of the etiological factors causing Verticillium wilt of horseradish roots means that they can be considered as an ecological micro-niche or “microhabitat”, which is shaped by, inter alia, weather factors and plant protection measures. In assessing the biodiversity of these microhabitats, we have applied the basic criterion of biodiversity, which is species richness (S). It is obvious that this biodiversity is negligible compared to that found in soil. Nevertheless, it seems to be important in the pathogenesis of Verticillium wilt of horseradish roots.
In the analysed years, the smallest number (i.e., lowest richness) of species, namely 26, was recorded in the warmest season with the highest water deficit—i.e., in 2015 (Supplementary Table S1). On the other hand, in the years 2016–2017, along with the increase in recorded precipitation, the species richness increased to 37 (Table 5, Supplementary Table S2). The same number of species was obtained in the BPPo and BPMe plots. On the other hand, the species richness in the control plot was 25. With full chemical protection (ChP), the S index equalled 19. In the studies to date, there are no reports from research studies that would involve the biodiversity assessment of the community of microorganisms associated with diseases of complex etiology. Earlier studies indicate that with the increasing biodiversity (expressed by various indicators), the severity of disease symptoms decreases [42].
In 2015, the eudominant group had the largest share (38.81%), mainly due to the record-high frequency of V. dahliae (28.16%), followed by the 10.65% share of A. Brassicae(Supplementary Table S1). The V. dahliae species was a constant component of the eudominant group in all of the studied years, and in 2016, it was its only representative, accounting for 19.23%. In the last growing season, R. solani (10.90%) and I. destructans (10.16%) also belonged to the group of eudominants. On the other hand, the share of the dominant group ranged from 9.75% to 20.88%, and F. acuminatum was the only representative of dominants in 2015 (9.75%). Then, R. solani and I. destructans dominated in 2016. In turn, G. irregulare (8.80%) and E. nigrum (8.18%) dominated in the communities of fungi isolated in 2017.
In all protection variants, V. dahliae belonged to the group of eudominants, isolated with the highest frequency from the infected roots of the control plot (25.57%) (Table 5, Supplementary Table S2). This proves that the tested preparations limited the development of this species. Its lowest share, at the level of 11.22%, was recorded among isolates obtained from the BPEm combination.
The dominant role of V. dahliae in the pathogenesis of Verticillium wilt is confirmed by other authors [28,29,30,32,61,62]. Moreover, in the complex of microorganisms causing Verticillium wilt of horseradish roots progressing from the vascular bundles, the following ranked as dominants: Globisporangium irregulare (Pythium irregulare),R. solani, Ilynonectria destructans (Cylindrocarpon destructans, Fusarium acuminatum, Epicocum nigrum and Alternaria brassicae). There is no information in the literature concerning the share of I. destructans and G. irregulare in the complex causing Verticillium wilt of horseradish roots. Numerous authors point to the high pathogenicity of I. destructans in relation to the underground parts of many plant species [63,64,65,66,67]. According to Yu [28], F. acuminatum is a constant component of the complex of Verticillium wilt of horseradish roots. Pathogens such as F. acuminatum, R. solani, and G. irregulare were most frequently isolated from the ChP plot. This proves chemical protection to be ineffective against these pathogens. In particular, R. solani exhibits exceptional resistance to synthetic fungicides [68,69]. In view of the above information, the use of BCAs and PGPs is revealed as an alternative method that can be used to reduce pathogens and disease severity without adversely affecting the environment. Brožova [70] claims that P. oligandrum not only reduces the concentration in soil of R. solani, Fusarium spp. and many other significant pathogens, but it also increases the population of antagonists. Ourstudydoes not supportthis conclusion. The antagonistic species of Trichoderma viride with the highest frequency was found in the community of fungi isolated from the infected horseradish roots of the BPEm plot (treated with E. maxima extract). This was also the observation of previously published studies [61,71]. Antagonism of fungi of the genus Trichoderma against R. solani has been observed repeatedly, and other mechanisms such as competition for food and induction of resistance genes have been pointed out [72,73,74]. In the present study, the increase in T. viride frequency was also accompanied by a smaller proportion of R. solani. Koutb and Ali [75] report that E. nigrum is an antagonist effective in reducing the pathogenic activity of P. irregulare. The same reaction was observed in our study. Infected roots from the combination of seedling treatment with B. subtilis and P. oligandrum as well as E. maxima were colonized by E. nigrum with the highest frequency, while the share of G. irregulare decreased.
Diversity of interactions between the dominant microrganisms colonizing horseradish roots with symptoms of Verticillium wilt of horseradish roots was demonstrated (Table 6).Eudominants V. dahliae significantly negatively correlated with I. destructans and T. viride. It was concluded that I. destructans had different microhabitat preferences than V.dahliae. The frequency of this fungus increased in the years with more rainfall, while the development of V. dahliae was favored by drought (Supplementary Table S1). It turned out that T. viride as an antagonist can significantly reduce the population of V. dahliae as well as G. irregulare and F. acuminatum. E. nigrum showed very strong antagonism towards F. avenaceum and F. acuminatum.The significantly positive strong correlation between V. dahliae and A. brassicae, as well as R. solani and G. irregulare, indicates the synergism of these pathogens in the Verticillium wilt of horseradish roots complex.

3.3. Chemical Composition of Horseradish Roots

The abundance of nutrients in vegetables is the basic feature that determines the suitability of their edible parts for consumption. The chemical composition is a varietal feature and may vary significantly depending on the soil, climatic, and agro-technical conditions [76]. Vegetables and fruits are one of the basic groups of food products that provide the ingredients necessary for proper functioning of the human body. A very important indicator of the quality and nutritional value of vegetables is the dry matter content. Based on its quantity, it can be established whether the product is rich in nutrients or not [77]. In the tested horseradish roots, the average dry matter content was 28.0 g·100 g−1 (Table 7), and it ranged from 23.1 to 31.1 g·100 g−1. Similar values for the dry matter content of horseradish have also been reported by other authors [78,79,80].
The two-factor analysis of variance showed that the level of dry matter was statistically significantly different—both depending on the year of cultivation and the protection treatments applied. The lowest amount of dry matter was found in horseradish roots from PD plots—namely, 25.4 g·100 g−1 on average—while the highest amount was found in BPEm plots (29.9 g·100 g−1 on average). Witkowicz et al. [51] reported that pre-sowing treatment of buckwheat seeds with E. maxima algae extract also favoured the accumulation of dry matter in the sprouts of this plant, while B. subtilis reduced the level of this component. Having analysed the level of dry matter in horseradish roots depending on the year of plant cultivation, we observed that the horseradish roots most abundant in dry matter were those grown in 2016, that is the year in which the hydrothermal conditions were the closest to the optimal horseradish requirements. In turn, the lowest level of dry matter was characteristic of the roots harvested in the year 2017, classified as moist and warm. Many researchers indicate large variability in the amount of dry matter in vegetables under the impact of climate and soil factors [81,82,83,84]. In turn, according to Marcinek and Hetman [85], the dry matter content in vegetables does not depend on the preparations used in plant cultivation. These hypotheses are confirmed in the studies of Wierzbicka and Majkowska [86] and Kowalska et al. [87].
In vegetable cultivation, apart from the yield, more and more attention is paid to the quality of the harvested crops, measured not only by such features as appearance and taste, but also by the content of organic ingredients [88]. Protein is one of the most important nutrients. Its content in the tested horseradish roots was in the range 14.8–21.6 g·100 g−1 dry matter (DM), which corresponds approx. 4–6 g·100 g−1 fresh weight (Table 8). The obtained results were similar to the data reported in the literature on the subject. According to Kunachowicz [78], the protein content in horseradish root is approx. 4.5 g·100 g−1, whereas Orłowski and Kołota [89] report a much lower value. On the other hand, Orłowski [90] determined 1.6–3.1 g of protein per 100 g of fresh root mass. On the basis of the conducted study, it was found that the tested horseradish roots contained more protein than other vegetables such as beets, carrots, cucumbers, parsley, and radishes and less than garlic and green peas [78]. As was observed in the case of dry matter, the content of protein in the roots was also significantly differentiated depending on the year of cultivation and protective treatments. Similar observations were also made by Noworodnik [91], who stated that the use of fungicides impacts the increase of the total protein content. The lowest protein content was found in horseradish roots obtained from the cultivation where BPPo was used, as well as those obtained in 2017. Significantly more of this nutrient was contained in horseradish roots in the BPEm and RChP plots.
The fat content in horseradish roots was insignificant, and it did not exceed 1 g in 100 g of dry matter (Table 9). Based on the statistical analysis, it was found that the level of this component varied significantly depending on the plant protection method. The accumulation of fat in the roots was significantly favoured by the treatment of seedlings with the application of P. oligandrum.
Carbohydrate turned out to be the basic component of root dry matter (Table 10). Significant differences in the level of this component were observed depending on both the year of cultivation and the protective treatments applied. The roots most abundant in these ingredients were those obtained in 2016 and those protected with the BPEm.
The ash content ranged from 6.21 to 7.89 g·100 g−1 dry matter (Table 11), which was approx. 2 g·100 g−1 fresh weight. The values obtained in the conducted studies were comparable to the values indicated in the tables of nutritional value [78]. A similar level of ash is also characteristic of “Hajdúsági torma” horseradish variety. The level of minerals expressed as ash was significantly differentiated depending on the protective treatments applied and the year of cultivation (Table 10). Higher values were characteristic for the roots obtained in 2016 and those from the control plot. The applied protection variants reduced the ash content. However, the roots from both the ChP and BPPo plots contained significantly less minerals. Literature lacks information on the impact of protection treatments on the chemical composition of horseradish, and such an impact is rarely analysed in relation to other vegetables. However, in studies on buckwheat, it was reported that pre-sowing treatment of seeds with P. oligandrum oospores reduces the ash level in sprouts [51].
The alkalinity of ash in the tested horseradish roots ranged between 47.5 and 55.2 cm3 0.1 M HCl g·100 g−1 of dry matter (Table 12). There is no data available on this parameter in horseradish roots in the literature on the subject. Korus [92] investigated the alkalinity of ash in grass peaseeds, indicating much higher values, i.e., 85 cm3 0.1 M HCl·100 g−1 DM. The statistical analysis of the obtained results showed statistically significant differences in the ash alkalinity depending on the applied treatments and the year of horseradish cultivation. The ash from BPPo-plot horseradish demonstrated the lowest alkalinity (on average, 49.6 cm3 0.1 M HCl g·100 g−1 DM), while the highest was found in the horseradish grown in the control plot (53.2 cm3 0.1 M HCl per 100 g DM) (Table 11). A higher value of this parameter indicates a higher content of elements such as potassium, magnesium, sodium, and calcium, which are of high nutritional significance.

4. Conclusions

The study showed that Verticillium wilt of horseradish roots, which determines the plant’s suitability for food processing, is a serious problem in its cultivation. Especially in seasons with a high water deficit, where the DSI of roots reaches 52.00%, a good opportunity to improve the health of plants is provided by the variant of biological protection using E. maxima for seedling treatment, as well as reduced chemical protection (RChP). On the other hand, biological protection with the participation of P. oligandrum and B.subtilis produces beneficial protective effects in vegetation seasons rich in rainfall and with optimal humidity. In the process leading to internal Verticillium wilt of horseradish roots, 34 species of fungi were identified as well as G. irregulare, the latter being the only recorded representative of Oomycetes. In the population of these microorganisms, depending on the protection applied, V. dahliae is eudominant with an incidence of 11.22% to 25.57%. In turn, G. irregulare, I. destructans, F. acuminatum, R. solani, E. nigrum, and A. brassicae species were found consistently throughout the study, but their categorisation in the frequency groups depended on the growing season and protection measures used.The applied protection treatments differentiated quantitatively and qualitatively the communities of microorganisms isolated from the infected horseradish roots. A significant negative correlation was observed between the number of these communities (CFU) and the intensity of Verticillium wilt symptoms after the application of BPPo, BPBs, RChP, and ChP. The communities of microorganisms isolated from the diseased roots from the BPPo and BPEm plots were characterised by the greatest variety of species and the participation of antagonistic fungi. The content of dry matter, protein, fat, carbohydrates, and ash in horseradish roots as well as alkalinity are all significantly impacted by hydrothermal conditions in the given growing season. We also found statistically significant effects of the interaction between the cultivation years and plant protection treatments for each of the tested ingredients. Biological protection in years with sufficient water supply resulted in a significant increase in the content of dry matter, protein, and carbohydrates in horseradish roots. Under the influence of protective treatments, the ash content in the roots and the alkalinity of the ash were observed to have decreased.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/2/680/s1, Table S1: Frequency of species in microbial communities isolated from horseradish roots in the years 2015–2017, Table S2: Frequency of species in microbial communities isolated from horseradish roots in depending of treatments protection.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.G.-K.; methodology, K.G.-K. and A.F.; software, K.G.-K., A.F.-F. and L.L.; validation, K.G.-K., E.B., A.F.-F. and A.F.; formal analysis, K.G.-K., L.L. and A.F., investigation, K.G.-K., E.B., L.L., A.F.-F. and A.F.; writing—original draft preparation, K.G.-K. and A.F.-F.; writing—review and editing, K.G.-K. and L.L.; visualization, K.G.-K.; supervision, E.B. All authors have read and agree to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was financed by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Poland.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We express our gratitude to the staff of the Microbiological Diagnostics Laboratory of the Jagiellonian Center of Innovation for making fungi markings.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Johnston, J.S.; Pepper, A.E.; Hall, A.E.; Chen, Z.J.; Hodnett, G.; Drabek, J.; Lopez, R.; Price, H.J. Evolution of Genome Size in Brassicaceae. Ann. Bot. 2005, 95, 229–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Walters, S.A.; Wahle, E.A. Horseradish Production in Illinois. Hort Technol. 2010, 20, 267–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Bladh, K.W.; Olsson, K.M. Introduction and Use of Horseradish (Armoracia rusticana) as Food and Medicine from Antiquity to the Present: Emphasis on the Nordic Countries. J. Herbs Spices Med. Plants 2011, 17, 197–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bladh, K.W.; Liljeroth, E.; Poulsen, G.; Yndgaard, F.; Brantestam, A.K. Genetic diversity in Nordic horseradish, Armoracia rusticana, as revealed by AFLP markers. Genet. Resour. Crop. Evol. 2013, 61, 383–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Shehata, A.; Mulwa, R.M.S.; Babadoost, M.; Uchanski, M.; Norton, M.A.; Skirvin, R.; Walters, S.A. Horseradish: Botany, Horticulture, Breeding. Hortic. Rev. 2009, 35, 221–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Majewska, A.; Bałasińska, B.; Dąbrowska, B. Antioxidant properties of leaf and root extract and oil from different types of horseradish Armoracia rusticana. Folia Hort. 2004, 16, 15–22. [Google Scholar]
  7. Kosson, R.; Horbowicz, M. Effect of Long Term Storage on Some Nutritive Components and Isothiocyanates Content in Roots of Two Horseradish Types. Veg. Crop. Res. Bull. 2008, 69, 155–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Agneta, R.; Möllers, C.; Rivelli, A.R. Horseradish (Armoracia rusticana), a neglected medical and condiment species with a relevant glucosinolate profile: A review. Genet. Resour. Crop. Evol. 2013, 60, 1923–1943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Calabrone, L.; LaRocca, M.; Marzocco, S.; Martelli, G.; Rossano, R. Total Phenols and Flavonoids Content, Antioxidant Capacity and Lipase Inhibition of Root and Leaf Horseradish (Armoracia rusticana) Extracts. Food Nutr. Sci. 2015, 6, 64–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Ciska, E.; Horbowicz, M.; Rogowska, M.; Kosson, R.; Drabińska, N.; Honke, J. Evaluation of Seasonal Variations in the Glucosinolate Content in Leaves and Roots of Four European Horseradish (Armoracia rusticana) Landraces. Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci. 2017, 67, 301–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Ar, R.; Lelario, F.; Agneta, R.; Möllers, C.; De Maria, S. Variation of glucosinolates concentration and root growth of horseradish as affected by nitrogen and sulphur supply. Plant Soil Environ. 2016, 62, 307–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Bałasińska, B.; Nicolle, C.; Gueux, E.; Majewska, A.; Demigné, C.; Mazur, A. Dietary horseradish reduces plasma cholesterol in mice. Nutr. Res. 2005, 25, 937–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Weil, M.J.; Zhang, Y.; Nair, M.G. Tumor Cell Proliferation and Cyclooxygenase Inhibitory Constituents in Horseradish (Armoracia rusticana) and Wasabi (Wasabia japonica). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 1440–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wagner, A.E.; Boesch-Saadatmandi, C.; Dose, J.; Schultheiss, G.; Rimbach, G. Anti-inflammatory potential of allyl-isothiocyanate-role of Nrf2, NF-κB and microRNA-155. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2012, 16, 836–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Romeo, L.; Iori, R.; Rollin, P.; Bramanti, P.; Mazzon, E. Isothiocyanates: An Overview of Their Antimicrobial Activity against Human Infections. Molecules 2018, 23, 624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Azevedo, A.M.; Martins, V.C.; Prazeres, D.; Vojinović, V.; Cabral, J.M.; Fonseca, L.P. Horseradish peroxidase: A valuable tool in biotechnology. Biotechnol. Annu. Rev. 2003, 9, 199–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Palanisamy, S.; Unnikrishnan, B.; Chen, S.M. An Amperometric Biosensor Based on Direct Immobilization of Horseradish Peroxidase on Electrochemically Reduced Graphene Oxide Modified Screen Printed Carbon Electrode. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2012, 7, 7935–7947. [Google Scholar]
  18. Spadiut, O.; Herwig, C. Production and purification of the multifunctional enzyme horseradish peroxidase. Pharm. Bioprocess. 2013, 1, 283–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Gleń-Karolczyk, K. Fungi settling horseradish roots depending on the applied protection. J. Res. Appl. Agricult. Eng. 2015, 60, 52–56. [Google Scholar]
  20. Gleń, K. Evaluation of foliar fertilizers for horseradish (Armoracia rusticana Gaertn) against fungal diseases. Ecol. Chem. Eng. A 2008, 15, 331–336. [Google Scholar]
  21. Gleń-Karolczk, K.; Boligłowa, E. The effect of Kelpak SL bioregulator on fungi isolated from the roots of horseradish (Armoracia rusticana Gaertn.). J. Res. Appl. Agricult. Eng. 2015, 60, 63–67. [Google Scholar]
  22. Wedelsbäck Bladh, K. Biodiversity in Nordic Horseradish (Armoracia rusticana); Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Sueciae: Uppsala, Sweden, 2014; ISSN 1652-6880. [Google Scholar]
  23. Verma, P.R.; Saharan, G.S.; Bartaria, A.M.; Shivpuri, A. Biological races of Albugocandida on Brassica juncea and Brassica rapa var.toria in India. J. Mycol. Plant Pathol. 1999, 29, 75–82. [Google Scholar]
  24. Meena, P.D.; Verma, P.R.; Saharan, G.S.; Hossein Borhan, M. Historical perspectives of white rust caused by Albugo candida in oilseed brassica. J. Oilseed Brassica 2014, 5, 1–41. [Google Scholar]
  25. Trkulja, N.; Milosavljević, A.; Mitrović, M.; Jović, J.; Toševski, I. First Report of Cercospora armoraciae, Causal Agent of Cercospora Leaf Spot, on Horseradish in Serbia. Plant Dis. 2015, 99, 1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Dewage, C.S.K.; Klöppel, C.A.; Stotz, H.U.; Fitt, B.D.L. Host–pathogen interactions in relation to management of light leaf spot disease (caused by Pyrenopeziza brassicae) on Brassica species. Crop. Pasture Sci. 2018, 69, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Babadoost, M.; Wright, C.L.; Chen, W.; Bratsch, A.D. Horseradish research review. In Proceedings of the Horseradish Growers School, A surveillance of horseradish diseases in Illinois in 2000, Edwardsville, IL, USA, 25 January 2001. [Google Scholar]
  28. Yu, J.M. Identification of Fungi and Bacteria Associated with Internally Discolored Horseradish Roots; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign: Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA, 2010; p. 96. [Google Scholar]
  29. Mueller, J.P.; Percich, J.A.; Mitchell, J.E. Root deterioration associated with Verticillium wilt of horseradish. Plant Dis. 1982, 66, 410–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Eastburn, D.M. Verticillium dahliae: A Causal Agent of Root Discoloration of Horseradish in Illinois. Plant Dis. 1994, 78, 496–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Babadoost, M.; Bratsch, A.D.; Eastman, C.E.; Chen, W. Verticillium longisporum and Fusarium solani: Two new species in the complex of internal discoloration of horseradish roots. Plant Pathol. 2004, 53, 669–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yu, J.M.; Cafarov, I.H.; Babadoost, M. Morphology, Molecular Identity, and Pathogenicity of Verticillium dahliae and V. longisporum Associated with Internally Discolored Horseradish Roots. Plant Dis. 2016, 100, 749–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Baćmaga, M.; Wyszkowska, J.; Kucharski, J. The effect of the Falcon 460 EC fungicide on soil microbial communities, enzyme activities and plant growth. Ecotoxicology 2016, 25, 1575–1587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Singh, Z.; Kaur, J.; Kaur, R.; Hundal, S.S. Toxic Effects of Organochlorine Pesticides: A Review. Am. J. Biosci. 2016, 4, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. De Vries, F.T.; Thébault, E.; Liiri, M.; Birkhofer, K.; Tsiafouli, M.A.; Bjørnlund, L.; Jørgensen, H.B.; Brady, M.V.; Christensen, S.; De Ruiter, P.C.; et al. Soil food web properties explain ecosystem services across European land use systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 14296–14301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Wagg, C.; Bender, S.F.; Widmer, F.; Van Der Heijden, M. Soil biodiversity and soil community composition determine ecosystem multifunctionality. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 5266–5270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Bender, S.F.; Wagg, C.; Van Der Heijden, M. An Underground Revolution: Biodiversity and Soil Ecological Engineering for Agricultural Sustainability. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2016, 31, 440–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lori, M.; Symnaczik, S.; Mäder, P.; De Deyn, G.; Gattinger, A. Organic farming enhances soil microbial abundance and activity—A meta-analysis and meta-regression. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0180442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Rillig, M.C.; Lehmann, A.; Lehmann, J.; Camenzind, T.; Rauh, C. Soil Biodiversity Effects from Field to Fork. Trends Plant Sci. 2018, 23, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Meng, J.; Li, L.; Liu, H.; Li, Y.; Li, C.; Wu, G.; Yu, X.; Guo, L.; Cheng, D.; Muminov, M.A.; et al. Biodiversity management of organic orchard enhances both ecological and economic profitability. Peer J 2016, 4, e2137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Das, S.; Jeong, S.T.; Das, S.; Kim, P.J. Composted Cattle Manure Increases Microbial Activity and Soil Fertility More Than Composted Swine Manure in a Submerged Rice Paddy. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gleń-Karolczyk, K.; Boligłowa, E.; Antonkiewicz, J. Organic fertilization shapes the biodiversity of fungal communities associated with potato dry rot. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2018, 129, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mierzwa-Hersztek, M.; Gleń-Karolczyk, K.; Gondek, K. Fungistatic activity of composts with the addition of polymers obtained from thermoplastic corn starch and polyethylene—An innovative cleaner production alternative. Sci. Total. Environ. 2018, 635, 1063–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Khan, W.; Rayirath, U.P.; Subramanian, S.; Jithesh, M.N.; Rayorath, P.; Hodges, D.M.; Critchley, A.T.; Craigie, J.S.; Norrie, J.; Prithiviraj, B. Seaweed Extracts as Biostimulants of Plant Growth and Development. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2009, 28, 386–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Thompson, B. Five years of Irish trials on biostimulants: The conversion of a skeptic. USDA For. Serv. Proc. 2004, 33, 72–79. [Google Scholar]
  46. El-Shennawy, R.Z. Biological control of root-rot and wilt disease of faba bean using some bioagents. J. Plant Prot. Pathol. 2011, 2, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Benhamou, N.; Le Floch, G.; Vallance, J.; Gerbore, J.; Grizard, D.; Rey, P. Pythium oligandrum: An example of opportunistic success. Microbiology 2012, 158, 2679–2694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Khabbaz, S.E.; Abbasi, P.A. Isolation, characterization, and formulation of antagonistic bacteria for the management of seedlings damping-off and root rot disease of cucumber. Can. J. Microbiol. 2014, 60, 25–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Habtegebriel, B.; Boydom, A. Biocontrol of faba bean black root rot caused by Fusarium solani using seed dressing and soil application of Trichoderma harzianum. J. Biol. Control. 2017, 30, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Frederiks, C.; Wesseler, J.H. A comparison of the EU and US regulatory frameworks for the active substance registration of microbial biological control agents. Pest Manag. Sci. 2018, 75, 87–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Witkowicz, R.; Biel, W.; Chlopicka, J.; Galanty, A.; Gleń-Karolczyk, K.; Skrzypek, E.; Krupa, M. Biostimulants and Microorganisms Boost the Nutritional Composition of Buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) Sprouts. Agronomy 2019, 9, 469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Witkowicz, R.; Biel, W.; Skrzypek, E.; Chłopicka, J.; Gleń-Karolczyk, K.; Krupa, M.; Prochownik, E.; Galanty, A. Microorganisms and Biostimulants Impact on the Antioxidant Activity of Buckwheat (Fagopyrum Esculentum Moench) Sprouts. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Polish Soil Classification. Soil. Sci. Ann. 2011, 62, 1–193.
  54. Świtoniak, M.; Kabała, C.; Charzyński, P. Proposal of English equivalents for the soil taxa names in the Polish Soils Classifica-tion. Soil. Sci. Ann. 2016, 67, 103–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Wenzel, H. Zur erfassung des schadenausmasses in pflanzenschutz versuchen. Pflanzenschutz Ber. 1948, 15, 81–84. [Google Scholar]
  56. De Carolis, E.; Posteraro, B.; Lass-Flörl, C.; Vella, A.; Florio, A.R.; Torelli, R.; Girmenia, C.; Colozza, C.; Tortorano, A.M.; Sanguinetti, M.; et al. Species identification of Aspergillus, Fusarium and Mucorales with direct surface analysis by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2012, 18, 475–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Kunachowicz, H.; Czarnowska-Misztal, E.; Turlejska, H. Zasady żywienia człowieka. Wydawnictwo Szkolne Pedagogiczne SA Warszawa 2005, 5, 36–44. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  58. Kasprzak, K.; Niedbała, W. Wskaźniki Biocenotyczne Stosowane Przy Porządkowaniu i Analizie Danych w Badanych Ilościowych; Górny, M., Grüm, L., Eds.; PWN: Warszawa, Poland, 1981; p. 483. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  59. Gardi, C.; Jeffery, S. Soil biodiversity. European Commission. Institute for Environmental and Sustainability. Luxemburg 2009, 10, 2788–7831. [Google Scholar]
  60. Skowera, B. Zmiany warunków hydrotermicznych na obszarze Polski (1971−2010). Fragm. Agron. 2014, 31, 74–87. [Google Scholar]
  61. Gleń-Karolczk, K. Protective treatments shaping the yielding, healthiness and diversity of microorganisms associated with Verticillium wilt of horseradish roots (Armoracia rusticana Gaertn.). Zesz Nauk UR Krakowie 2019, 544, 136, (In Polish, English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  62. Percich, J.A.; Johnson, D.R. A root rot complex of horseradish. Plant Dis. 1990, 74, 391–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Rego, C.; Farropas, L.; Nascimento, T.; Cabral, A.; Oliveira, T. Black foot of grapevine: Sensitivity of Cylindrocarpon de-structans to fungicides. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2006, 45, 93–100. [Google Scholar]
  64. Kurzawińska, H. Fungi inhabiting the rhizosphere of persian cyclamen and their impact. Phytopathologia 2010, 57, 5–10. [Google Scholar]
  65. Pastucha, A.; Kołodziej, B. The effect of irrigation and foliar fertilization on the colonization of american ginseng (Panax quinquefolium l.) diseased parts by different micro-organisms. Acta Agrobot. 2012, 63, 179–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Samad, J.; Nasimi, Z. First report of black-foot disease, caused by Cylindrocarpon destructans, on ornamental marigold (Tagetes minuta) in Iran. J. Plant Prot. Res. 2014, 54, 139–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Farh, M.E.-A.; Kim, Y.-J.; Kim, Y.-J.; Yang, D.-C. Cylindrocarpon destructans/Ilyonectria radicicola -species complex: Causative agent of ginseng root-rot disease and rusty symptoms. J. Ginseng. Res. 2018, 42, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Reznikov, S.; Vellicce, G.R.; González, V.; De Lisi, V.; Castagnaro, A.P.; Ploper, L.D. Evaluation of chemical and biological seed treatments to control charcoal rot of soybean. J. Gen. Plant Pathol. 2016, 82, 273–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Anderson, J.P.; Sperschneider, J.; Win, J.; Kidd, B.; Yoshida, K.; Hane, J.K.; Saunders, D.G.O.; Singh, K.B. Comparative secretome analysis of Rhizoctonia solani isolates with different host ranges reveals unique secretomes and cell death inducing effectors. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 10410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Brozova, J. Exploitation of the mycoparasitic fungus Pythium oligandrum in plant protection—A review. Plant Prot. Sci. 2012, 38, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Gleń-Karolczyk, K. The effect of chitosan on yielding, health of the horseradish (Armoracia rusticana Gaertn.) roots and pathogenic fungi. J. Res. Appl. Agricult. Eng. 2016, 61, 113–118. [Google Scholar]
  72. Heydari, A.; Pessarakli, M. A Review on Biological Control of Fungal Plant Pathogens Using Microbial Antagonists. J. Biol. Sci. 2010, 10, 273–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Marroni, I.V.; Moura, A.B.; Ueno, B. Chemical and biological treatments of castor bean seeds: Effects on germination, emergence and associated microorganisms. Rev. Bras. Sement 2012, 34, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Mayo, S.; Gutiérrez, S.; Malmierca, M.G.; Lorenzana, A.; Campelo, M.P.; Hermosa, R.; Casquero, P.A. Influence of Rhizoctonia solani and Trichoderma spp. in growth of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and in the induction of plant defense-related genes. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Koutb, M.; Ali, E.H. Potential of Epicoccum purpurascens Strain 5615 AUMC as a Biocontrol Agent of Pythium irregulare Root Rot in Three Leguminous Plants. Mycobiology 2010, 38, 286–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Majkowska-Gadomska, J.; Dobrowolski, A.; Mikulewicz, E. Comparison of yield and nutrition some variety carrot (Daucus carota L.) Grown with ecological methods of protection. Zesz Probl. Post. Nauk Rol. 2016, 585, 121–129. [Google Scholar]
  77. Filipiak-Florkiewicz, A. The effect of hydrothermal processing on selected health properties of cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var.botrytis L.). Zesz Nauk UR Krakowie 2011, 347, (In Polish, English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  78. Kunachowicz, A.; Przygoda, B.; Nadolna, I.; Iwanow, K. Tabele Składu i Wartości Odżywczej Żywności; Wydawnictwo Lekarskie: Warszawa, Poland, 2017. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  79. Majewska, A.; Dąbrowska, B.; Węglarz, Z. Yielding and content of nutrients and biologically active compounds in several ecotypes of horseradish (Armoracia rusticana Gaertn.) cultivated in different localities. Biul. Inst. Hod. Aklim. Roślin 2003, 226–227, 553–563. [Google Scholar]
  80. Rivelli, A.R.; Caruso, M.C.; De Maria, S.; Galgano, F. Vitamin C content in leaves and roots of horseradish (Armoracia rusticana): Seasonal variation in fresh tissues and retention as affected by storage conditions. Emir. J. Food Agric. 2017, 29, 799–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Adiku, S.; Renger, M.; Wessolek, G.; Facklam, M.; Hecht-Bucholtz, C. Simulation of the dry matter production and seed yield of common beans under varying soil water and salinity conditions. Agric. Water Manag. 2001, 47, 55–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Gębczyński, P. Zmiany zawartości wybranych związków przeciwutleniających w mrożonych warzywach w zależności od obróbki wstępnej, warunków składowania i sposobu przygotowania do spożycia. Zesz Nauk AR Krakowie 2008, 445, 21–80, (In Polish, English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  83. Kwabiah, B.W. Growth and yield of sweet corn (Zea mays L.) cultivars in response to planting date and plastic mulch in a short-season environmental. Sci. Hortic. 2004, 102, 147–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Lisiewska, Z.; Korus, A.; Kmiecik, W.; Gębczyński, P. Effect of maturity stage on the content of ash components in raw and preserved grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) seeds. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2009, 57, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Marcinek, B.; Hetman, J. The effect of foliage feeding on the strucutre of yield, dry weight content and macroelements in the corms of Sparaxis tricolor Ker-Gawl. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus 2008, 7, 89–99. [Google Scholar]
  86. Wierzbicka, B.; Majkowska, J. Wpływ nawożenia dolistnego na zawartość wybranych składników w korzeniach buraka ćwikłowego. Acta Agrophysica 2003, 85, 169–176, (In Polish, English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  87. Kowalska, I.; Sady, W.; Szura, A. Effects of nitrogen form, foliar nutrition and growing place on yield and quality of lettuce. Acta Agrophysica 2006, 7, 619–631. [Google Scholar]
  88. Biczak, R.; Herman, B.; Rychter, P. Effects of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilization on yield and biological value of leaf celery Part I: Vegetables yield and mineral composition. Proc. Ecopole 2011, 5, 161–171, (In Polish, English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  89. Orłowski, M.; Kołota, E. Uprawa warzyw. Szczecin 1999, 274–278. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  90. Orłowski, M. Polowa Uprawa Warzyw. Szczecin 2000, 370–377. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  91. Noworodnik, K. Effect of some herbicides and fungicides on protein content and protein quality in grain of oats. Prog. Plant Post. Ochr. Roślin 2008, 48, 1535–1537. [Google Scholar]
  92. Korus, A. Content of mineral components in fresh and preserved seeds of two grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) cultivars at the not fully mature stage. Acta Sci. Pol. Technol. Aliment. 2002, 1, 36–46. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Infection of horseradish roots by a fungi complex causing Verticillium wilt. Disease severity index (DSI) [%] (homogeneous groups, Tukey’s HSD test, α = 0.05). Values marked with the same letters do not differ statistically significantly, p < 0.05. Control—Without protection; ChP—Chemical protection; RChP—Reduced chemical protection with the participation of biopreparations and biostimulants; BPPo—Biological protection (root cuttings treatment before planting with Pythium oligandrum); BPBs—Biological protection (root cuttings treatment before planting with Bacillus subtilis); BPEm—Biological protection (root cuttings treatment before planting with Ecklonia maxima).
Figure 1. Infection of horseradish roots by a fungi complex causing Verticillium wilt. Disease severity index (DSI) [%] (homogeneous groups, Tukey’s HSD test, α = 0.05). Values marked with the same letters do not differ statistically significantly, p < 0.05. Control—Without protection; ChP—Chemical protection; RChP—Reduced chemical protection with the participation of biopreparations and biostimulants; BPPo—Biological protection (root cuttings treatment before planting with Pythium oligandrum); BPBs—Biological protection (root cuttings treatment before planting with Bacillus subtilis); BPEm—Biological protection (root cuttings treatment before planting with Ecklonia maxima).
Applsci 11 00680 g001
Figure 2. Number of colony forming units (CFUs) isolated from internally infected horseradish roots.
Figure 2. Number of colony forming units (CFUs) isolated from internally infected horseradish roots.
Applsci 11 00680 g002
Table 1. Scheme of horseradish protection treatments.
Table 1. Scheme of horseradish protection treatments.
TreatmentsProtection Method
Root Cuttings Treatment
Before Planting
TheFoliar Application
Fungicide PreparationsInsecticide PreparationsBiostimulants
ControlUntreatedWithout protection1 × Decis Mega 50 EW, 0.15l·ha−1
1 × Proteus 110 OD, 0.6 l·ha−1
1 × Sumi Alpha 050 EC, 0.2 l·ha−1
4 × Dipel® WG,1 kg·ha−1
Not used
Chemical protection
ChPTopsin M 500 SC
0.2% solution) (soaking
for 15 min.)
2 × Dithane Neo Tec 75 WG, 2 kg·ha−1
2 × Amistar Opti 480 SC, 2.5 l·ha−1
2 ×Ridomil Gold MZ Pepite 67.8 WG, 2 kg·ha−1
2 × Decis Mega 50 EW, 0.15 l·ha−1
2 × Proteus 110 OD, 0.6 l·ha−1
1 × Nurelle D 550, 0.6 l·ha−1
1 × Sumi Alpha 050 EC, 0.2 l·ha−1
1 × Bulldock 025 EC,0.3 l·ha−1
Not used
First treatments in the first pair of leaves unfolded. Next treatments depending on the occurrence of disease symptoms and pests. The preparations were used alternately.
Reduced chemical protection with the participation of biopreparations and biostimulants
RChPTopsin M 500 SC
(0.2% solution)
(soaking
for 15 min.)
1 × Amistar Opti 480 SC, 2.5 l·ha−1
1 × Polyversum WP, 200 g·ha−1
1 × Serenade ASO, 8 l·ha−1
1 × Decis Mega 50 EW, 0.15l·ha−1
1 × Proteus 110 OD, 0.6 l·ha−1
1 × Sumi Alpha 050 EC, 0.2 l·ha−1
4 × Dipel® WG,1 kg·ha−1
2 × Kelpak SL,
4 l·ha−1
(first treatment in the 4-leaf stage, the next in the 9- leaf stage)
1 × Asahi SL,
0.5 l·ha−1
(when leaves cover 40% of the soil)
First treatment in the stage of the first pair of leaves. Next treatment depending on the occurrence of disease symptoms and pests. The preparations were used alternately. The protection with biopreparations started in the second half of the growing season, at least 10 days after the use of chemical preparations. The Protector adjuvant—300 mL ha−1—was used together with biopreparations.
Biological protection
BPPoPolyversum WP, 10 g kg−1 of cuttings (soaking for 30 min.)2 × Polyversum WP, 200 g·ha−1
2 × Serenade ASO, 8 l·ha−1
5 × Dipel® WG, 1 kg·ha−1
3 × Spin Tor 240 SC, 0.4 l·ha−1
2 × Kelpak SL,
4 l·ha−1
(first treatment in the 4-leaf stage, the next in the 9- leafstage)
2 × Asahi SL,
0.5 l·ha−1
(when leaves cover 40% of the soil, the next at the beginning of August
BPBsSerenade ASO, 400 mL kg−1 of cuttings (soaking for 30 min.)
BPEmKelpak SL, 0.4% (soaking for 10 min.)
Dates oftreatments depending on the occurrence of disease symptoms and pests, were made alternately.
Horseradish root cuttings were manually treated with Polyversum WP, Serenade ASO, Kelpak SL and Topsin M 500 SC. The plants were sprayed with a hand sprayer (Titan 12 knapsack sprayer, Marolex).
Table 2. Precipitation totals and mean air temperatures at 2 m above sea level, in the growing months in the years 2015–2017, in the Siemkowice region (according to the Institute of Meteorology and Water Management National Research Institute in Poznań).
Table 2. Precipitation totals and mean air temperatures at 2 m above sea level, in the growing months in the years 2015–2017, in the Siemkowice region (according to the Institute of Meteorology and Water Management National Research Institute in Poznań).
YearMonthsTotal/Mean
IIIIVVVIVIIVIIIIXX
Precipitation total [mm]
201529.721.729.476.54235.741.135.8311.9
201635.238.364.971.5133.727.522.799.9493.7
201750.458.456.4128.861.153.5185.488.7682.7
1971–201032.638.153.870.882.566.251.339.3434.6
Mean air temperature [ᵒC]
20155.18.413.216.720.122.815.47.513.7
20164.08.714.718.418.918.016.07.713.3
20175.97.113.417.118.119.313.410.113.1
1971–20102.97.713.316.017.717.513.08.312.1
Sielianinov hydrothermal coefficient [K]
2015 0.9 *0.71.50.70.50.91.5
2016 1.51.41.32.30.50.54.2
2017 2.71.42.51.10.94.62.8
* K ≤ 0.4—extremely dry month; 0.4 < K ≤ 0.7—very dry; 0.7 < K ≤ 1.0—dry; 1.0< K ≤ 1.3—quite dry; 1.3< K ≤ 1.6—optimal; 1.6 < K ≤ 2.0—moderately humid; 2.0 < K≤ 2.5—humid; 2.5 < K≤ 3.0—very humid; K > 3.0—extremely humid [60].
Table 3. Relationships between the intensity of Verticillium wilt of horseradish roots (DSI) and the number of colony forming units (CFUs) and between the intensity of Verticillium wilt of horseradish roots (DSI) and the sum of precipitation in the growing season (SP) and CFUs and the sum of precipitation in the growing season.
Table 3. Relationships between the intensity of Verticillium wilt of horseradish roots (DSI) and the number of colony forming units (CFUs) and between the intensity of Verticillium wilt of horseradish roots (DSI) and the sum of precipitation in the growing season (SP) and CFUs and the sum of precipitation in the growing season.
Protection Treatments D S I ^ = b 0 + b 1 S P D S I ^ = a 0 + a 1 C F U r S P . C F U
b 0 b 1 r D S I . S P a 0 a 1 r D S I . C F U
Control92.9−0.345 ***−0.984 ***89.2−0.274 ***−0.851 ***0.927 ***
ChP57.5−0.073 ***−0.935 ***64.5−0.307 ***−0.934 ***1.000 ***
RChP40.4−0.040 ***−0.976 ***50.9−0.187 ***−0.984 ***0.999 ***
BPPo76.4−0.101 ***−0.895 ***93.7−0.302 ***−0.996 ***0.928 ***
BPBs79.3−0.102 ***−0.926 ***84.9−0.264 ***−0.960 ***0.995 ***
BPEm35.0−0.024 **−0.712 ***30.0−0.029−0.2050.830***
t-test significant respectively at: p< 0.01 **; p< 0.001 ***. Control - Without protection; ChP—Chemical protection; RChP—Reduced chemical protection with the participation of biopreparations and biostimulants; BPPo—Biological protection (root cuttings treatment before planting with Pythium oligandrum); BPBs—Biological protection (root cuttings treatment before planting with Bacillus subtilis); BPEm—Biological protection (root cuttings treatment before planting with Ecklonia maxima).
Table 4. List of species of microorganisms isolated from horseradish roots affected by Verticillium wilt in the years 2015–2017.
Table 4. List of species of microorganisms isolated from horseradish roots affected by Verticillium wilt in the years 2015–2017.
PhylumGenusSpeciesNumber of IsolatesIsolation FrequencyC [%]Group of Attendance
AscomycotaAcremoniumA. strictum (W. Gams)90.26SR
AspergillusA. niger Tiegh.140.40
A. terreus Thom120.34
AlternariaA. brassicae (Berk.) Sacc.1885.36D
A. alternata(Fr.) Keissel1002.85SD
BotrytisB. cinerea Pers.732.08
ChaetomiumC. globosum Kunze ex Fr.411.17R
ClonostachysC. rosea (Link) Schroers, Samuels, Seifert & W. Gams100.28SR
CurvulariaC. lunata (Wakker) Boedijn631.79R
ColletotrichumC. acutatum J.H. Simmonds862.45SD
EpicoccumE. nigrum Link (2.93)1955.56D
FusariumF. acuminatum Ellis & Everh.2296.53
F. avenaceum (Fr.) Sacc.942.68SD
F. culmorum (Wm.G. Sm.) Sacc.411.17R
F. equiseti (Corda) Sacc.1173.33SD
F. proliferatum (Matsush.) Nirenberg ex Gerlach & Nirenberg1393.96
F. solani (Mart.) Sacc.1143.25
F. incarnatum (Desm.) Sacc.772.19
F. sambucinum Fuckel511.45R
F. oxysporum Schltdl.391.11
IlyonectriaI. destructans (Zinssm.) Rossman, L. Lombard & Crous2366.73D
PenicilliumP. expansum Link902.56SD
P. verrucosum Dierckx140.40SR
Penicillium spp.330.97
PhomaP. herbarum Westend.130.37
Didymella glomerata (Corda) Qian Chen & L. Cai (P. glomerata)210.60
Juxtiphoma eupyrena (Sacc.) Valenz.-Lopez, Crous, Stchigel, Guarro & J.F. Cano (P. eupyrena)310.88
UlocladiumU. consortiale (Thüm.) E.G.Simmons240.68
SclerotiniaS. sclerotiorum (Lib.) de Bary912.60SD
TrichodermaT. viride Pers. ex Gray772.19
VerticilliumV. albo-atrum Reinke & Berthold561.60R
V. dahliae Kleb.50414.37E
BasidiomycotaRhizoctoniaR. solani Kühn2376.75D
ZygomycotaRhizopusRh. stolonifer (Ehrenb.) Vuill.381.09R
RhizomucorRhizomucor spp.130.37SR
MucorMucor spp.190.54
Total fungi318990.91
OomycotaGlobisporangiumG. irregulare (Buisman) Uzuhashi, Tojo & Kakish2416.87D
Unknown microorganisms782.22
Total3508100
E—eudominants (>10%); D—dominants (5.1–10.0%); SD—subdominants (2.1–5.0%); R—recedents (1.1–2.0%); SR—subrecedents (<1%).
Table 5. Frequency of species in microbial communities isolated from horseradish roots.
Table 5. Frequency of species in microbial communities isolated from horseradish roots.
Species of Fungi Protection Treatments
ChPRChPBPPoBPBsBPEmControl
A. brassicae 4.416.552.433.666.15
A. alternata 2.144.611.770.810.764.37
B. cinerea 0.771.090.403.031.94
C. globosum 1.541.360.401.39
C. lunata 2.140.771.911.622.141.29
C. acutatum 2.881.771.211.893.07
E. nigrum 3.570.968.7312.558.071.94
F. acuminatum 5.717.874.370.815.679.87
F. avenaceum 3.574.410.95 0.635.50
F. culmorum 1.431.340.950.881.29
F. equiseti 3.573.263.143.642.654.21
F. proliferatum 2.863.453.554.454.413.24
F. solani 1.431.922.591.624.293.40
F. incarnatum 0.191.361.213.032.75
F. sambucinum 3.571.341.911.210.761.46
F. oxysporum 0.950.812.140.49
I. destructans 10.018.646.559.318.953.56
P. expansum 4.294.032.861.622.520.49
P. verrucosum 2.140.580.410.810.38
S. sclerotiorum 2.693.824.862.400.81
T. viride 0.952.025.170.65
V. albo-atrum 2.141.731.500.401.641.29
V. dahliae 13.5719.9620.7019.0311.2225.57
R. solani 20.008.255.468.504.795.83
Rh. stolonifer 0.581.502.021.51
Rhizomucor spp. 0.952.430.13
Mucor spp.
Total fungi 84.2888.1092.9090.6991.0590.29
G. irregulare 12.869.216.288.916.187.93
S 192937323725
Explanations Eudominants (>10%) Dominants (5.1–10.0%)
Subdominants (2.1–5.0%) Recedents (1.1–2.0%)
Subrecedents (<1%)
Table 6. Correlations between microorganisms occurring with the highest frequency in the communities of microorganisms isolated from diseased horseradish roots.
Table 6. Correlations between microorganisms occurring with the highest frequency in the communities of microorganisms isolated from diseased horseradish roots.
Species of FungiV. dahliaeG. irregulareR. solaniF. acuminatumF. avenaceumA. brassicaeE. nigrumI. destructans
G. irregulare−0.207
R. solani−0.3830.948 ***
F. acuminatum0.3410.033−0.066
F. avenaceum0.468 *0.4120.2580.881 ***
A. brassicae0.674 **−0.811 ***−0.857 ***0.3750.128
E. nigrum−0.253−0.374−0.263−0.909 ***−0.948 ***−0.093
I. destructans−0.804 ***0.4570.535 *−0.583 *−0.467−0.805 ***0.304
T. viride−0.560 *−0.533 *−0.453−0.288−0.641 **0.0030.544 *0.201
t-test significant respectively at p < 0.05 *; p < 0.01 **; p < 0.001 ***.
Table 7. Effect of protection treatments and year of horseradish cultivation on dry matter content [g·100 g−1].
Table 7. Effect of protection treatments and year of horseradish cultivation on dry matter content [g·100 g−1].
Protection TreatmentsYearMean
201520162017
ChP26.2 c ± 0.1426.8 d ± 0.3223.1 a ± 0.3625.4 ± 1.71
RChP28.7 gh ± 0.4127.7 e ± 0.2924.5 b ± 0.4127.0 ± 1.90
BPPo27.5 e ± 0.1431.8 l ± 0.1828.2 fg ± 0.3629.2 ± 1.98
BPBs27.7 e ± 0.1828.9 h ± 0.2428.1 f ±0.1828.2 ± 0.55
BPEm31.3 k ± 0.1830.7 j ± 0.2227.6 e ± 0.1829.9 ± 1.70
Control30.1 i ± 0.1828.5 g ± 0.1226.2 c ± 0.1228.3 ± 1.67
Mean28.6 ± 1.0129.1 ± 1.4826.3 ± 1.8628.0 ± 1.24
Values marked with the same letters do not differ statistically significantly, p < 0.05.
Table 8. Effect of protection treatments and year of horseradish cultivation on protein content(g·100 g−1 dry matter).
Table 8. Effect of protection treatments and year of horseradish cultivation on protein content(g·100 g−1 dry matter).
Protection TreatmentsYearMean
201520162017
ChP18.8 j ± 0.217.2 f ± 0.0316.5 d ± 0.317.5 ± 1.05
RChP21.6 n ± 0.1120.6 ł ± 0.0717.1 f ± 0.1319.8 ± 2.03
BPPo18.5 i ± 0.0514.8 a ± 0.1416.9 e ± 0.1016.7 ± 1.61
BPBs20.4 l ± 0.0418.1 h ± 0.0716.1 c ± 0.0818.2 ± 1.84
BPEm21.4 m ± 0.1718.9 j ± 0.1016.9 e ± 0.0619.1 ± 1.92
Control19.8 k ± 0.2617.5 g ± 0.0515.9 b ± 0.0417.7 ± 1.69
Mean20.1 ± 2.0117.8 ± 2.1416.6 ± 1.9818.2 ± 1.94
Values marked with the same letters do not differ statistically significantly, p < 0.05.
Table 9. Effect of protection treatments and the year of horseradish cultivation on fat content(g·100 g−1 dry matter).
Table 9. Effect of protection treatments and the year of horseradish cultivation on fat content(g·100 g−1 dry matter).
Protection TreatmentsYearMean
201520162017
ChP0.85 cd ± 0.020.76 bc ± 0.030.69 a ± 0.010.77 ± 0.07
RChP0.96 e ± 0.010.90 de ± 0.020.80 bc ± 0.030.89 ± 0.07
BPPo1.05 f ± 0.130.87 d ± 0.030.82 bc ± 0.020.91 ± 0.12
BPBs0.89 de ± 0.020.72 ab ± 0.030.70 ab ± 0.020.77 ± 0.09
BPEm0.79 bc ± 0.010.74 abc ± 0.030.67 a ± 0.030.73 ± 0.06
Control0.93 de ± 0.030.89 de ± 0.020.75 abc ± 0.40.86 ± 0.09
Mean0.91 ± 0.090.81 ± 0.080.74 ± 0.080.82 ± 0.11
Values marked with the same letters do not differ statistically significantly, p < 0.05.
Table 10. Effect of protection treatments and year of horseradish cultivation on carbohydrate content (g·100 g−1 dry matter).
Table 10. Effect of protection treatments and year of horseradish cultivation on carbohydrate content (g·100 g−1 dry matter).
Protection TreatmentsYearMean
201520162017
ChP72.1 g ± 0.1169.1 b ± 0.1566.9 a ± 0.1269.3 ± 2.22
RChP66.9 a ± 0.1369.5 c ± 0.0466.8 a ± 0.0769.5 ± 2.24
BPPo72.8 h ± 0.0773.5 j ± 0.0670.7 e ± 0.1172.3 ± 1.27
BPBs73.0 i ± 0.0973.8 k ± 0.0469.9 d ± 0.1472.3 ± 1.75
BPEm75.8 ł ± 0.0375.0 l ± 0.1271.0 f ± 0.1573.6 ± 2.06
Control76.9 m ± 0.1472.1 g ± 0.0669.9 d ± 0.0572.9 ± 3.06
Mean73.9 ± 2.0172.0 ± 1.5669.2 ± 2.1271.7 ± 2.68
Values marked with the same letters do not differ statistically significantly, p < 0.05.
Table 11. Effect of protection treatments and the year of horseradish cultivation on ash content (g·100 g−1 dry matter).
Table 11. Effect of protection treatments and the year of horseradish cultivation on ash content (g·100 g−1 dry matter).
Protection TreatmentsYear of CultivationMean
201520162017
ChP7.19 g ± 0.027.09 g ± 0.036.21 a ± 0.056.83 ± 0.46
RChP7.19 g ± 0.067.35 h ± 0.056.32 b ± 0.056.95 ± 0.48
BPPo6.46 c ± 0.036.92 f ± 0.056.68 d ± 0.126.69 ± 0.21
BPBs6.94 f ± 0.086.81 e ± 0.027.00 fg ± 0.076.92 ± 0.10
BPEm7.41 h ± 0.98.01 j ± 0.016.76 de ± 0.047.39 ± 0.54
Control7.32 h ± 0.047.89 i ± 0.037.02 fg ± 0.157.41 ± 0.39
Mean7.09 ± 0.587.35 ± 1.026.67 ± 0.657.03 ± 0.47
Values marked with the same letters do not differ statistically significantly, p < 0.05.
Table 12. Effect of protection treatments and the year of horseradish cultivation on ash alkalinity (0.1 M HCl per 100 g of dry matter).
Table 12. Effect of protection treatments and the year of horseradish cultivation on ash alkalinity (0.1 M HCl per 100 g of dry matter).
Protection TreatmentsYear of CultivationMean
201520162017
ChP50.1 ef ± 0.0451.9 j ± 0.0649.1 d ± 0.0750.4 ± 1.21
RChP50.3 g ± 0.0452.5 k ± 0.0349.0 cd ± 0.0450.6 ± 1.49
BPPo47.5 a ± 0.0451.0 h ± 0.0950.2 fg ± 0.1649.6 ± 1.58
BPBs48.6 b ± 0.0951.2 i ± 0.1250.2 f ± 0.0350.0 ± 1.13
BPEm50.1 e ± 0.0753.4 l ± 0.0348.9 c ± 0.1350.8 ± 2.00
Control53.5 l ± 0.0555.2 ł ± 0.9051.0 h ± 0.1253.2 ± 1.80
Mean50.0 ± 2.0952.5 ± 1.8949.7 ± 1.3850.7 ± 1.92
Values marked with the same letters do not differ statistically significantly, p < 0.05.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gleń-Karolczyk, K.; Boligłowa, E.; Filipiak-Florkiewicz, A.; Florkiewicz, A.; Luty, L. The Effect of Biopreparations and Biostimulants on the Chemical Composition and Microorganisms Associated with Verticillium Wilt of Horseradish Roots (Armoracia rusticana Gaertn.). Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 680. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11020680

AMA Style

Gleń-Karolczyk K, Boligłowa E, Filipiak-Florkiewicz A, Florkiewicz A, Luty L. The Effect of Biopreparations and Biostimulants on the Chemical Composition and Microorganisms Associated with Verticillium Wilt of Horseradish Roots (Armoracia rusticana Gaertn.). Applied Sciences. 2021; 11(2):680. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11020680

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gleń-Karolczyk, Katarzyna, Elżbieta Boligłowa, Agnieszka Filipiak-Florkiewicz, Adam Florkiewicz, and Lidia Luty. 2021. "The Effect of Biopreparations and Biostimulants on the Chemical Composition and Microorganisms Associated with Verticillium Wilt of Horseradish Roots (Armoracia rusticana Gaertn.)" Applied Sciences 11, no. 2: 680. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11020680

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop