Next Article in Journal
Removal of Heavy Metals (Cd2+, Cu2+, Ni2+, Pb2+) from Aqueous Solution Using Hizikia fusiformis as an Algae-Based Bioadsorbent
Previous Article in Journal
Identification of Bioactive Plant Volatiles for the Carob Moth by Means of GC-EAD and GC-Orbitrap MS
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Developing a Recommendation Model for the Smart Factory System

1
Department of Intelligent Commerce, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung 807618, Taiwan
2
Business Intelligence School, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung 807618, Taiwan
3
Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung 807618, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(18), 8606; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11188606
Submission received: 3 July 2021 / Revised: 20 August 2021 / Accepted: 13 September 2021 / Published: 16 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Topic Industrial Engineering and Management)

Abstract

In Industry 4.0, the concept of a Smart Factory heralds a new phase in manufacturing; the Smart Factory System (SFS) will have a huge demand in Taiwan. However, the cost of constructing a factory system will be high, and the complexity processes and introduction time must be considered. Thus, it is important to figure out how to grasp the key success factors for Smart Factories to reduce difficulties in the process, deal with the occurrence of problems, and improve the success rate of constructing Smart Factories. This research constructs an SFS recommendation model to make up for past research deficiencies in terms of recommendation. It combines the methodology of the Engel–Kollat–Blackwell Model (EKB Model) and the Modified Delphi Method to derive SFS recommendation indicators. Through analyzing weights, the ELECTRE II was used to obtain the importance of each dimension by calculating the Modified Compound Advantage Matrix. For prototype indicators, it reviewed the past literature to find out deficiencies and examined the world’s four largest manufactories or computer technology corporations to analyze their Smart Factory solutions regarding the SFS function characteristics. The survey ran for several rounds with a group of five experts to amend indicators until a consensus was obtained. It proposed 64 indicators of 8 primary dimensions in total, based on the Updated Information System Success Model, and then added the concepts of SFS Function characteristics, Information Security, Perceived Value, Perceived Risk, and UI Design. According to the indicators, the framework and prototype of this system will provide solutions and references for purchasing SFS, the functions of which include SFS purchase ability analysis, demand analysis of manufacture problems, and raking and scoring of recommendation indicators. It will provide real-time ranking and the best alternative recommendations to suppliers, and will not only be referred to for design and modification but also enable the requirements to be closer to the users’ demands.
Keywords: Smart Factory; recommendation model; recommendation system; Modified Delphi Method; ELECTRE II Method Smart Factory; recommendation model; recommendation system; Modified Delphi Method; ELECTRE II Method

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chang, C.-Y.; Tu, C.-A.; Huang, W.-L. Developing a Recommendation Model for the Smart Factory System. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 8606. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11188606

AMA Style

Chang C-Y, Tu C-A, Huang W-L. Developing a Recommendation Model for the Smart Factory System. Applied Sciences. 2021; 11(18):8606. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11188606

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chang, Chun-Yang, Chun-Ai Tu, and Wei-Luen Huang. 2021. "Developing a Recommendation Model for the Smart Factory System" Applied Sciences 11, no. 18: 8606. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11188606

APA Style

Chang, C.-Y., Tu, C.-A., & Huang, W.-L. (2021). Developing a Recommendation Model for the Smart Factory System. Applied Sciences, 11(18), 8606. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11188606

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop