Next Article in Journal
Insulator Faults Detection in Aerial Images from High-Voltage Transmission Lines Based on Deep Learning Model
Next Article in Special Issue
Analysis of the Influence of CO2 Concentration on a Spark Ignition Engine Fueled with Biogas
Previous Article in Journal
Improving the Dyeability and Anti-Wrinkle Properties of Cotton Fabric via Oxidized Raffinose
Previous Article in Special Issue
Economic Analysis of Potential Secondary Use of Batteries from Electric Vehicles
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Analysis of Biodiesel Influence on Unregulated Gaseous Emissions of Diesel Motor Vehicles

1
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, TU Košice, Letná 9, 040 01 Košice, Slovakia
2
The Slovak Legal Metrology (SLM), Hviezdoslavova 1124/31, 974 01 Banská Bystrica, Slovakia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(10), 4646; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11104646
Submission received: 23 March 2021 / Revised: 13 May 2021 / Accepted: 16 May 2021 / Published: 19 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Engine Technologies and Innovative Vehicle Driving Systems)

Abstract

:
This scientific study is focused on the analysis of an influence of the experimental diesel fuel mixtures containing various portions of the biocomponent on the unregulated gaseous emissions generated by a diesel motor vehicle, which is equipped with the diesel engine utilizing the direct fuel injection system “common rail”. The main reason for the choice of this engine type was its wide usage in the current vehicles. The experimental diesel fuel mixtures were created as a mixture of the standard low-sulfur diesel fuel with the biodiesel, using various mixing ratios. The experiments were realized by means of a special 13-regime engine test cycle, which was intentionally developed for the diesel combustion engines. All the individual experiments were performed on the base of the given test cycle with 13 different operational modes. The obtained results offer a complex view on the generation of the unregulated emissions with regard to the operational conditions and taking into consideration operational loading of the given experimental engine.

1. Introduction

Constantly growing energy consumption and the degradation of environmental quality require the search for alternative fuels in order to replace the petroleum fuels that are used nowadays in motor vehicles. One of the most often applied alternative fuels is biodiesel. The main advantage of biodiesel is its renewability and reduction in greenhouse gases [1]. Biodiesel can be used either in its pure form or in the form of diesel mixtures. For that reason, there have been various studies focused on diesel engines, which combust diesel mixtures. In general, it is possible to say that the application of biodiesel causes an increase in fuel consumption, reduction in HC emissions, CO emissions and particulate matter emissions as well as a moderate higher amount of NOx emissions [2,3,4,5,6]. The influence of unregulated emissions was also investigated by Sharp et al. [7] using three diesel engines. They recorded the reduced emissions of hydrocarbon and acetaldehyde. The USEPA [8] also presents lower levels of acetaldehyde, formaldehyde and xylene. According to McGill et al. [9] the interesting unregulated emissions, namely aldehyde and 1,3-butadiene, are almost independent on the kind of fuel. Di et al. [10] performed investigations with the following results: the reduced amount of formaldehyde, 1,3-butadiene, toluene and xylene, and the increased amount of acetaldehyde and benzene. Lapuerta et al. [11] stated a lack of published scientific research information concerning the impact of biodiesel on unregulated emissions. Taking into consideration all the above-mentioned facts, we can say that it is necessary to carry out another scientific research works oriented around unregulated gaseous emissions of automotive diesel engines. In order to supplement a gap of knowledge in this area, in our study, the unregulated gaseous emissions of diesel engines are invesigated by means of a special 13-regime test cycle, which was directly developed for the diesel engine. The analyzed unregulated emissions include formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, 1,3 butadiene, propene, benzene, toluene and xylene. All these matters are classified as substances harmful for the atmosphere.

2. Experiment Conditions

The practical base for the experimental measurements created a diesel engine equipped with a direct fuel injection system of the common rail type, which is normally installed in a wide range of diesel engine vehicles. The tested diesel mixtures were achieved by mixing biodiesel with pure diesel using various mixing ratios. The pure diesel fuel contained less than 10 ppm of the sulfur, such that it was the so-called ultra-low sulfur diesel (ULSD-F). Biodiesel was obtained from waste oil according to the valid European standard EN-14214. The individual diesel mixtures were determined, taking into consideration the previous experiments, as follows: B–U (25:75) (25% biodiesel and 75% ULSD-F), B–U (50:50), B-U (75:25). The most important technical parameters of the tested diesel engine are summarized in Table 1.
The experimental testing system was created by the placement of the tested diesel vehicle engine on the testing dynamometer according to Figure 1. The gas analyzer was used to perform analysis of regulated gaseous emissions, i.e., for the analysis of nitrogen oxides (NOX), hydrocarbons (HC), carbon monoxide (CO) and particulate matter (PM).
Analysis of unregulated emissions (such as acetaldehyde, 1,3-butadiene, formaldehyde, ethene, propene and BTX hydrocarbons) was performed using the multi-component gas analyzer. The calibration of this analyzer was repeated before each measurement. The fuel consumption was measured by the electronic flowmeter. The characteristics of the experimental biodiesel and ULSD-F are presented in Table 2.
The European Stationary Cycle (ESC) was used in order to analyze the influence of the fuel mixtures on the gaseous emissions. The ESC testing parameters are described in Table 3 and in Figure 2. The first regime of the testing process measurement was the stable operation of the tested engine. This first phase is characterized by the constant temperature of the coolant, lubricating oil and exhaust gases. Afterwards, the engine operational parameters were monitored at five-minute intervals; namely in the form of mean values of the measured operational parameters. The experiments were repeated two times with regard to the elimination of potential random failures. The results obtained from the experiments agree with the 97% confidence level.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Parameters of the Experimental Engine

Table 4 presents the fuel consumption (FC), given in kg/h, for the individual fuel mixtures. The values of the brake thermal efficiency (BTE) were calculated using data of the engine speed, torque and fuel consumption. It is evident that the combustion of biodiesel increases the fuel consumption, because the biodiesel heat value is lower compared to the standard diesel fuel. At the same time, the combustion of biodiesel increases the BTE thanks to a higher amount of oxygen in this fuel, which has a positive effect on the speed and quality of the combustion process. It is also possible to say that a higher level of the engine speed also increases the fuel consumption and reduces the BTE values. On the other hand, the BTE values are higher if the engine loading is rising. The above-mentioned facts are valid for both kinds of the fuels, i.e., for diesel fuel and for biodiesel, as well.

3.2. The Regulated Emissions

The regulated emissions that are analyzed in this article include: HC, CO and NOX. The obtained results are shown in Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5.
It is evident from the analysis presented in Figure 3 that combustion of the fuel with a portion of biodiesel reduces the HC emissions under all conditions due to the oxygen, which is contained in biodiesel; thus, it increases the fuel combustion efficiency [12].
It can be stated, according to the measured data, that the profile of HC emissions reaches its maximum at the average engine speed of 1920 rpm in the case of medium engine loading and for both types of fuels (100% diesel fuel and biodiesel). However, it should be also mentioned that in the case of low engine loading levels and at the engine speed of 1280 rpm, the HC emissions increased with higher engine loading; thereby, the HC emissions were reduced at high engine loading levels and at the engine speed of 2560 rpm. A similar situation was also recorded at engine speeds of 1920 rpm and 1280 rpm. In this case, the HC emissions increased if the engine loading raised from 20% to 40%. Higher fuel consumption causes also a higher amount of HC emissions. At the same time, the rising engine loading generates increased temperatures of the burned gas in the cylinder as well as increased temperature of the exhaust gases. In this way, there is also a reduced volume of the unburned fuel components. The HC emissions are lower at higher engine speeds thanks to the improved oxidation of HC due to the high level of the exhaust gas temperatures.
Analogous to the HC emissions, we can say that a higher amount of biodiesel reduces the CO emissions, according to Figure 4.
It can be stated, according to the obtained results, that an increase in the CO emissions is essential in the operational modes 11 and 12, namely due to the higher value of the fuel/air ratio, which is necessary at a high engine loading level. At the same time, the CO emissions rise with the increasing engine speed. It is visible from Figure 4 that the addition of biodiesel to the standard diesel fuel causes an increase in NOX emissions. The generation of NOX emissions is a function of the local oxygen concentration, combustion temperature and ignition delay [10]. The engine operational mode has a significant influence on the combustion process temperature and thus it can significantly affect the amount of generated NOX emissions. A higher engine speed at lower engine loading reduces NOX emissions. On the other hand, higher engine loading requires a higher amount of the injected fuel, which causes higher combustion temperature and, finally, an increase in NOX emissions.
Figure 6 illustrates the particulate matter (PM) emissions in the operational modes 3, 6, 7, 8, 12. The PM emissions are reduced in the case of a larger volume of biodiesel in the fuel mixture during the operational modes 6, 7, 8, 12. The reason for this reduction consists in the following factors: the absence of aromatic content in biodiesel and the presence of oxygen in biodiesel, which improves the oxidation of the carbon particles.
The PM emissions increase with higher engine loading due to a larger amount of the injected fuel. Another relevant factor for the increase in PM emissions is the higher engine speed level, which causes a decrease in the volumetric efficiency [13]. The reduced volumetric efficiency means the higher AFR value, which leads to the production of PM emissions.

3.3. The Unregulated Emissions

The emissions of acetaldehyde and formaldehyde (Figure 7 and Figure 8) grow with the increasing portion of biodiesel in the fuel mixture. This dependence is caused mainly due to the fact that short-chain chemicals, which are contained in the biodiesel produced from the home waste oil, are able to create the shortest carbonyl chain during the combustion process, i.e., acetaldehyde and formaldehyde [14].
At the same time, the operational or working conditions also have a major impact on these emissions. An increase in formaldehyde emissions was recorded within the interval from low to middle engine loading level. A decrease in this kind of emissions was monitored in the range from middle to high engine loading level and for all the tested fuels, according to Figure 7, at the engine speed 1920 rpm. The developed trend concerning acetaldehyde emissions is very similar, as seen in Figure 8. A higher volume of carbonyl emissions in the case of low engine loading level is caused due to increased fuel consumption. A reduction in these emissions at high engine loading level is a positive consequence of the rising combustion temperature as well as the exhaust gas temperature. Higher engine speed reduces acetaldehyde and formaldehyde emissions thanks to higher combustion temperatures.
The unsaturated alkenes, i.e., propene, ethene and 1,3-butadiene, are the chemical precursors of diesel soot. 1,3-butadiene is one of the most harmful substances that pollutes air with regard to its carcinogenic impact [15].
It is possible to say, according to the measured results presented in Figure 9, Figure 10 and Figure 11, that the emissions of 1,3-butadiene grow with the increasing amount of biodiesel.
Emissions of the three above-described toxic substances are reduced in the case of increased engine loading, but their concentration rises during the operational modes 11 and 12 [16].
Taking into consideration the emissions of benzene, xylene and toluene (BXT), a phenomenon that just the unburned fuel molecules generate these kind of gaseous emissions is observed. Table 5 documents the influence of biodiesel on the BXT emissions in the operational modes 5, 9 and 11 within the 13-regime experimental test cycle at the engine speed 1920 rpm. Benzene emissions grow when the content of biodiesel in the fuel is higher, whereby this relation is valid in the case of every engine loading level. However, the emissions of xylene and toluene are reduced if the volume of biodiesel is increased [16].
The total amount of BXT emissions is based on the measured data and is summarized in Table 5. The global volume of BXT emissions is lower if the engine loading increases, at the engine speed of 1920 rpm, because the higher temperature of the combustion process (due to higher level of engine loading) improves the oxidation process of the BXT emissions. The analogous results were obtained using another two engine speed levels: 1280 rpm and 2560 rpm. However, no relevant influence of the engine speed on BXT emissions was monitored.

4. Conclusions

The article is focused on the influences of biodiesel, which is mixed with standard diesel fuel, and on gaseous emissions (both on regulated and unregulated) in the case of diesel engine, taking into consideration the infamous emission scandal, named “dieselgate”. The results of the experiments performed with the fuel mixture biodiesel–diesel, concerning the controlled emissions, point out a relevant fact that during all the engine operational modes, CO emissions and also hydrocarbon emissions were reduced, and NOX emissions were increased in comparison with the combustion of pure diesel fuel.
With regard to the unregulated emissions, it was noted that the emissions of acetaldehyde and formaldehyde increased together with the growing volume of biodiesel contained in the fuel mixture. An analogous situation is also characteristic for the emissions of propene, ethene and 1,3-butadiene. Biodiesel also increases benzene emissions, but at the same time it also reduces xylene and toluene emissions. However, no significant changes relating to the BXT emissions were monitored, thanks to the fact that a higher volume of benzene emissions were simultaneously compensated by the lower xylene and toluene emissions. It is important to emphasize the reality that gaseous emissions, whether regulated or unregulated, are predominantly influenced by engine operational modes that are required according to the changing engine loading [17].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.P. and M.K.; methodology, M.P. and J.Ž.; investigation, Š.K. and M.L.; data analysis, M.P. and M.L.; writing—original draft preparation, J.Ž. and M.K.; writing—review and editing, M.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Slovak Research and Development Agency under the Contract no. APVV-19-0328. The article was written in the framework of Grant Projects: VEGA 1/0318/21 “Research and development of innovations for more efficient utilization of renewable energy sources and for reduction of the carbon footprint of vehicles”, KEGA 006TUKE-4/2020 “Implementation of Knowledge from Research Focused on Reduction of Motor Vehicle Emissions into the Educational Process” and this work was supported by the Slovak Research and Development Agency under the contract No. APVV-16-0259.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Basha, S.A.; Gopal, K.R.; Jebaraj, S. A review on biodiesel production, combustion, emissions and performance. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2009, 13, 1628–1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Utlu, Z.; Koçak, M.S. The effect of biodiesel fuel obtained from waste frying oil on direct injection diesel engine performance and exhaust emissions. Renew. Energy 2008, 33, 1936–1941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wang, T.; Liu, J.; Sun, P.; Ji, Q.; Gao, W.; Yang, C. Influence of injection parameters on combustion, gaseous emissions and particle size distribution of a CRDI diesel engine operating with PODE/diesel blends. Fuel 2020, 281, 118733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sinay, J.; Puškár, M.; Kopas, M. Reduction of the NOx emissions in vehicle diesel engine in order to fulfill future rules concerning emissions released into air. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 624, 1421–1428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Puškár, M.; Jahnátek, A.; Kádárová, J.; Šoltésová, M.; Kovanič, L.; Krivosudská, J. Environmental study focused on the suitability of vehicle certifications using the new European driving cycle (NEDC) with regard to the affair “dieselgate” and the risks of NOx emissions in urban destinations. Air Qual. Atmos. Health 2019, 12, 251–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Puškár, M.; Kopas, M.; Puškár, D.; Lumnitzer, J.; Faltinová, E. Method for reduction of the NOX emissions in marine auxiliary diesel engine using the fuel mixtures containing biodiesel using HCCI combustion. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2018, 127, 752–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Sharp, C.A.; Howell, S.A.; Jobe, J. The effect of biodiesel fuels on transient emissions from modern diesel engines, part II unreg-ulated emissions and chemical characterization. SAE Trans. 2000, 1784–1807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Agency, E.P. A Comprehensive Analysis of Biodiesel Impacts on Exhaust Emissions; US Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 2002.
  9. McGill, R.; Storey, J.; Wagner, R.; Irick, D.; Aakko, P.; Westerholm, M.; Nylund, N.-O.; Lappi, M. Emission Performance of Selected Biodiesel Fuels; SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-1866; SAE International: Warrendale, PA, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Di, Y.; Cheung, C.; Huang, Z. Experimental investigation on regulated and unregulated emissions of a diesel engine fueled with ultra-low sulfur diesel fuel blended with biodiesel from waste cooking oil. Sci. Total Environ. 2009, 407, 835–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Lapuerta, M.; Armas, O.; Rodriguezfernandez, J. Effect of biodiesel fuels on diesel engine emissions. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2008, 34, 198–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zouaoui, N.; Brilhac, J.-F.; Mechati, F.; Jeguirim, M.; Djellouli, B.; Gilot, P. Study of experimental and theoretical procedures when using thermogravimetric analysis to determine kinetic parameters of carbon black oxidation. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2010, 102, 837–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tsolakis, A. Effects on Particle Size Distribution from the Diesel Engine Operating on RME-Biodiesel with EGR. Energy Fuels 2006, 20, 1418–1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Guarieiro, L.L.N.; Pereira, P.A.D.P.; Torres, E.A.; Da Rocha, G.O.; De Andrade, J.B. Carbonyl compounds emitted by a diesel engine fuelled with diesel and biodiesel–diesel blends: Sampling optimization and emissions profile. Atmos. Environ. 2008, 42, 8211–8218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Krahl, J.; Munack, A.; Schröder, O.; Stein, H.; Bunger, J. Influence of Biodiesel and Different Designed Diesel Fuels on the Exhaust Gas. Emissions and Health Effects. SAE Trans. 2003, 112, 2447–2455. [Google Scholar]
  16. Takada, K.; Yoshimura, F.; Ohga, Y.; Kusaka, J.; Daisho, Y. Experimental Study on Unregulated Emission Characteristics of Tur-Bocharged DI Diesel Engine with Common Rail Fuel Injection System; SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-3158; SAE International: Warrendale, PA, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kuric, I.; Cisar, M.; Tlach, V.; Zajacko, I.; Gál, T.; Więcek, D. Technical diagnostics at the department of automation and production systems. In International Conference on Intelligent Systems in Production Engineering and Maintenance; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; Volume 835, pp. 474–484. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. The experimental system.
Figure 1. The experimental system.
Applsci 11 04646 g001
Figure 2. European Stationary Cycle (ESC).
Figure 2. European Stationary Cycle (ESC).
Applsci 11 04646 g002
Figure 3. Experimental fuels and the HC emissions.
Figure 3. Experimental fuels and the HC emissions.
Applsci 11 04646 g003
Figure 4. Experimental fuels and the CO emissions.
Figure 4. Experimental fuels and the CO emissions.
Applsci 11 04646 g004
Figure 5. Experimental fuels and the NOX emissions.
Figure 5. Experimental fuels and the NOX emissions.
Applsci 11 04646 g005
Figure 6. Experimental fuels and the PM emissions.
Figure 6. Experimental fuels and the PM emissions.
Applsci 11 04646 g006
Figure 7. Experimental fuels and the formaldehyde emissions.
Figure 7. Experimental fuels and the formaldehyde emissions.
Applsci 11 04646 g007
Figure 8. Experimental fuels and the acetaldehyde emissions.
Figure 8. Experimental fuels and the acetaldehyde emissions.
Applsci 11 04646 g008
Figure 9. Experimental fuels and the 1,3-butadiene emissions.
Figure 9. Experimental fuels and the 1,3-butadiene emissions.
Applsci 11 04646 g009
Figure 10. Experimental fuels and the propene emissions.
Figure 10. Experimental fuels and the propene emissions.
Applsci 11 04646 g010
Figure 11. Experimental fuels and the ethene emissions.
Figure 11. Experimental fuels and the ethene emissions.
Applsci 11 04646 g011
Table 1. The experimental engine parameters.
Table 1. The experimental engine parameters.
Type4-Cylinders, Common-Rail Diesel
Compression ratio (CR)16.2:1
Bore × stroke81 × 95.5 mm
Displacement1968 cm3
Rated output110 kW
Engine speed3500–4000 rpm
Table 2. The characteristics of the experimental fuels.
Table 2. The characteristics of the experimental fuels.
BiodieselULSD-F
Density, 15 (kg·m−3)860 ÷ 920820 ÷ 845
Viscosity (40 °C) (mm2·s−1)3.8 ÷ 5.11.9 ÷ 4.1
Cetane numbermin 55min 47
Sulphur content (mg·kg−1)max 10max 10
Heat of evaporation (kJ·kg−1)252 ÷ 295285 ÷ 338
Flash point (°C)10382
Carbon content (wt %)81.697.2
Hydrogen content (wt %)12.413.4
Oxygen content (wt %)10.50
Table 3. The European Stationary Cycle (ESC) test regimes.
Table 3. The European Stationary Cycle (ESC) test regimes.
ModeEngine SpeedLoad (%)Weight (%)Duration
(min)
1Low idle0154
2A10082
3B50102
4B75102
5A5052
6A7552
7A2552
8B10092
9B25102
10C10082
11C2552
12C7552
13C5052
Table 4. The FC and BTE.
Table 4. The FC and BTE.
ModeULSD-FB-U (25:75)B-U (50:50)B-U (75:25)Biodiesel
FC (kg/h)BTE (%)FC (kg/h)BTE (%)FC (kg/h)BTE (%)FC (kg/h)BTE (%)FC (kg/h)BTE (%)
10.68 0.70 0.73 0.77 0.85
22.1825.012.2125.302.2525.622.3525.922.4326.12
33.3133.153.3233.403.4433.523.5433.823.6934.31
40.67 0.70 0.72 0.77 0.83
53.6423.313.7023.513.8123.523.9823.694.1423.83
65.4931.045.5631.255.7031.435.9231.736.1531.92
78.0227.228.2527.328.3727.628.3727.629.0228.01
811.0030.1911.1830.3811.3630.4811.3630.4812.1831.05
97.6233.617.7933.877.9234.007.9234.007.9734.93
109.7335.139.8935.3310.1135.5210.1135.5210.8736.12
1111.2134.2411.3834.2011.7234.1911.7234.1912.6034.78
1214.7829.9514.9130.1915.2430.2915.2430.2916.4130.79
132.189.522.319.342.469.142.469.142.659.32
Table 5. The benzene, toluene and xylene emissions.
Table 5. The benzene, toluene and xylene emissions.
ModeFuelBenzene
(mg/kWh)
Toluene
(mg/kWh)
Xylene
(mg/kWh)
5ULSD-F79.09.534.1
B-U (25:75)83.88.227.0
B-U (50:50)88.26.722.7
B-U (75:25)91.55.420.2
Biodiesel95.14.38.5
9ULSD-F43.23.612.8
B-U (25:75)44.33.09.9
B-U (50:50)45.92.58.0
B-U (75:25)47.22.05.9
Biodiesel49.81.73.5
11ULSD-F21.01.75.3
B-U (25:75)22.11.54.2
B-U (50:50)22.51.43.1
B-U (75:25)23.41.22.5
Biodiesel25.21.01.8
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Puškár, M.; Živčák, J.; Král, Š.; Kopas, M.; Lavčák, M. Analysis of Biodiesel Influence on Unregulated Gaseous Emissions of Diesel Motor Vehicles. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 4646. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11104646

AMA Style

Puškár M, Živčák J, Král Š, Kopas M, Lavčák M. Analysis of Biodiesel Influence on Unregulated Gaseous Emissions of Diesel Motor Vehicles. Applied Sciences. 2021; 11(10):4646. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11104646

Chicago/Turabian Style

Puškár, Michal, Jozef Živčák, Štefan Král, Melichar Kopas, and Matúš Lavčák. 2021. "Analysis of Biodiesel Influence on Unregulated Gaseous Emissions of Diesel Motor Vehicles" Applied Sciences 11, no. 10: 4646. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11104646

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop