Next Article in Journal
Acoustic Individual Identification in Birds Based on the Band-Limited Phase-Only Correlation Function
Next Article in Special Issue
SoundFields: A Virtual Reality Game Designed to Address Auditory Hypersensitivity in Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder
Previous Article in Journal
An Experimental Tuning Approach of Fractional Order Controllers in the Frequency Domain
Previous Article in Special Issue
Real-Time Application for Generating Multiple Experiences from 360° Panoramic Video by Tracking Arbitrary Objects and Viewer’s Orientations
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

ALCC-Glasses: Arriving Light Chroma Controllable Optical See-Through Head-Mounted Display System for Color Vision Deficiency Compensation

Appl. Sci. 2020, 10(7), 2381; https://doi.org/10.3390/app10072381
by Ying Tang 1, Zhenyang Zhu 1, Masahiro Toyoura 2, Kentaro Go 2, Kenji Kashiwagi 3, Issei Fujishiro 4 and Xiaoyang Mao 2,5,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2020, 10(7), 2381; https://doi.org/10.3390/app10072381
Submission received: 2 March 2020 / Revised: 21 March 2020 / Accepted: 24 March 2020 / Published: 31 March 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Applications of Virtual, Augmented, and Mixed Reality)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This paper described a head-mounted display system for the compensation of color vision deficiency. The proposed daltonization process and hardware configuration add good amount of advantage on top of the conventional daltonization process. The reported results look promising in terms of RMS values. It will be more convincing if more existing methods can be added for comparative study because the current one is a >5 years work.

 

Author Response

Thank you for your valuable comments. As mentioned in the paper, the recent researches that have similar device mechanism or purpose to our study are [12] and [24]. While [12] uses almost the same approach to our comparisons (instead of the daltonization process, they use three other algorithm), and [24] does not use OST-HMD. To the best of our knowledge, there is no other research has same purpose of ours.

Thus, as a supplement, we changed the first paragraph of section 4 to:

In order to verify the effectiveness of the proposed method, we conducted an experiment to compare our results with the existing method. Both [12] and [13] have the same purpose as ours, that is, achieving color compensation by displaying overlay image on OST-HMD. Both methods do not support the light subtraction. We choose to compare with [12] as it also uses daltonization so that we can confirm the effect of the light subtraction while eliminating other factors caused by the difference of compensation methods.

[12] Langlotz, T.; Sutton, J.; Zollmann, S.; Itoh, Y.; Regenbrecht, H. ChromaGlasses: Computational Glasses for Compensating Colour Blindness. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2018, p. 390.
[13] Tanuwidjaja, E.; Huynh, D.; Koa, K.; Nguyen, C.; Shao, C.; Torbett, P.; Emmenegger, C.;Weibel, N. Chroma: a wearable augmented-reality solution for color blindness. Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 2014, pp. 799–810.
[24] Itoh, Y.; Langlotz, T.; Iwai, D.; Kiyokawa, K.; Amano, T. Light Attenuation Display: Subtractive See-Through Near-Eye Display via Spatial Color Filtering. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 2019, 25, 1951–1960.

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors,

your work is very interesting and well done I have only few suggestions:

Line 62 – there is a typo in ‘er al.’

Line 156 – in the word ‘naïve’, ‘i’ has two dots

Line 263 – there is ‘beam-slitter’ and should be beam-splitter’

Figure 10 is described after figure 11, maybe it would be better to consider the change in figures or description order.

 

Best wishes

 

 

 

Author Response

Thank you for your valuable comments. We have fixed the mistakes mentioned in the comments:

Point 1: Line 62 – there is a typo in ‘er al.’

Response 1: Changed 'Hiroi er al.' to 'Hiroi et al.' in line 62.

Point 2: Line 156 – in the word ‘naïve’, ‘i’ has two dots

Response 2: Changed 'naïve' to 'naive' in line 156.

Point 3: Line 263 – there is ‘beam-slitter’ and should be beam-splitter’

Response 3: Changed 'beam-slitter' to 'beam-splitter' in line 263.

Point 4: Figure 10 is described after figure 11, maybe it would be better to consider the change in figures or description order.

Response 4: We have changed the order of two figures.

Back to TopTop