#
Modeling of a Village-Scale Multi-Energy System for the Integrated Supply of Electric and Thermal Energy^{ †}

^{1}

^{2}

^{3}

^{4}

^{5}

^{*}

^{†}

## Abstract

**:**

## Featured Application

## Abstract

## 1. Introduction

## 2. Case Study and Scenario Characterization

^{2}∙year).

## 3. Modeling Approach

#### 3.1. Load Profiles

#### 3.1.1. Electric Load Curves

#### 3.1.2. Thermal Load Curves

- ${T}_{gw}\left[K\right]$ is the groundwater temperature;
- ${n}_{day}[-]$ is the progressive number of the considered day of the year;
- $\overline{{T}_{amb}}\left[K\right]$ is the yearly average ambient temperature;
- ${n}_{day}^{min}[-]$ is the progressive number of the day with the lowest temperature of the year.

- ${P}_{task}\left[W\right]$ is the power required to heat the water for the operation of the task;
- $c{p}_{w}\left[\frac{kJ}{kgK}\right]$ is the water isobaric specific heat;
- ${T}_{gw}\left[K\right]$ is the groundwater temperature.

- (i)
- commercial activities,
- (ii)
- domestic,
- (iii)
- public offices,
- (iv)
- school.

#### 3.2. Multi-Energy System

_{k}user-scale subsystems (where N

_{k}is the number of users within the k-th class). Indeed, the thermal energy balance (Equation (3)) satisfies independently the thermal demand (in this case DHW only) for each thermal user class k, and for each time step t.

#### 3.2.1. Electric Components

#### 3.2.2. Thermal Components

#### Solar Thermal Collectors

#### Hot-Water Tanks

- The energy stored in the tank is constrained not to exceed the maximum capacity ${C}_{SOC}{}_{tank}$ of the tank, for each class k.$${E}_{SO{C}_{Tank}}\left(k,t\right)\le {C}_{SOC}{}_{tank}\left(k\right)\forall k,\forall t$$
- The energy stored in the tank is constrained to be kept above a minimum value (defined as depth of discharge, ${D}_{SOC}$), defined as a percentage of the nominal tank capacity.$${E}_{SO{C}_{Tank}}\left(k,t\right)\ge {C}_{SOC}{}_{tank}\left(k\right)\xb7{D}_{SOC}\forall k,\forall t$$
- The thermal energy flow out of the tank (${E}_{Tan{k}_{out}}$) is constrained to be lower than the tank maximum power of discharge (${P}_{out,max}$) multiplied by a delta time ($\u2206t$) calibrated on the time-step.$${E}_{Tan{k}_{out}}\left(k,t\right)\le {P}_{out,max}\left(k\right)\xb7{\u2206}_{t}\forall k,\forall t$$

#### Electric Resistance Heating Elements

#### LPG Boilers

#### 3.2.3. Optimization

## 4. Results and Discussion

#### 4.1. Generated Load Profiles

#### 4.2. Optimization Results

## 5. Conclusions and Future Work

## Supplementary Materials

## Author Contributions

## Funding

## Acknowledgments

## Conflicts of Interest

## Abbreviations

MES | Multi-Energy System |

LPG | Liquid Propane Gas |

DHW | Domestic Hot Water |

TPES | Total Primary Energy Supply |

TFC | Total Final (energy) Consumption |

NPC | Net Present Cost |

LCOE | Levelized Cost of Energy |

LP | Linear Programming |

MILP | Mixed-Integer Linear Programming |

BESS | Battery Energy Storage System |

## Nomenclature

${T}_{gw}$ | Groundwater temperature | K |

${n}_{day}$ | Progressive number of the considered day of the year | - |

$\overline{{T}_{amb}}$ | Yearly average ambient temperature | K |

${n}_{day}^{min}$ | Progressive number of the day with the lowest temperature of the year | - |

${P}_{task}$ | Power required to heat the water for the operation of the task | W |

$\dot{{m}_{w}}$ | Water mass flow required by the task | l/s |

$c{p}_{w}$ | Water isobaric specific heat | $\mathrm{kJ}/\left(\mathrm{kg}\mathrm{K}\right)$ |

${E}_{Th,classdemand}\left(k,t\right)$ | Thermal energy demand | Wh |

${E}_{boiler}\left(k,t\right)$ | Energy supplied by the boiler | Wh |

${E}_{Tan{k}_{out}}\left(k,t\right)$ | Energy exiting the hot-water tank | Wh |

${E}_{Curt}\left(k,t\right)$ | Fraction of the excess energy produced by solar collectors that cannot be stored in the tank | Wh |

${E}_{lostload,th}\left(k,t\right)$ | Allowed fraction of unmet thermal load | Wh |

${E}_{El,demand}\left(t\right)$ | Electricity demand of the study area | Wh |

${E}_{PV}\left(t\right)$ | Energy produced by the PV panels | Wh |

${E}_{Gen}\left(t\right)$ | Energy produced by the generator | Wh |

${E}_{bat,ch}\left(t\right)$ | Flow of energy into the battery | Wh |

${E}_{bat,dis}\left(t\right)$ | Flow of energy out of the battery | Wh |

${E}_{Curt}\left(t\right)$ | Electric energy that is curtailed | Wh |

${E}_{Res,class}\left(k,t\right)$ | Energy supplied to the thermal storage through electric resistance heating elements | Wh |

${E}_{Res,tot}\left(t\right)$ | Cumulative energy absorbed by the electric resistance heating elements of all n thermal classes | Wh |

${E}_{lostload}\left(t\right)$ | Allowed fraction of unmet electric load | Wh |

${E}_{S{C}_{tot}}\left(k,t\right)$ | Total thermal energy provided by the solar collectors | Wh |

${E}_{SC}\left(k,t\right)$ | Energy generated by a single solar collector | Wh |

${N}_{SC}\left(k\right)$ | Number of solar collectors in the class | - |

${E}_{SO{C}_{Tank}}\left(k,t\right)$ | Thermal energy stored in the tank at the time step t | Wh |

${E}_{SO{C}_{Tank}}\left(k,t-1\right)$ | Thermal energy stored in the tank at the timestep t–1 | Wh |

${\eta}_{tank}$ | Coefficient accounting for energy losses due to the heat transfer between thermal storage and environment | - |

${\eta}_{Res}$ | Thermal efficiency of the electric resistances | - |

${D}_{SOC}$ | Depth of discharge | - |

${P}_{out,max}\left(k\right)$ | Tank maximum power of discharge | W |

$LP{G}_{cons}$ | LPG consumption | l |

${\eta}_{boiler}$ | Boiler efficiency | - |

$LH{V}_{LPG}$ | Lower heating value of the LPG | $\mathrm{kJ}/\mathrm{kg}$ |

$Inv$ | Total investment cost | $\$$ |

$YCC$ | Yearly constant cost of the project | $\$$ |

$e$ | Discount rate | - |

$r$ | Interest rate | - |

$Cos{t}_{rep}$ | Cost of components replacement | $\$$ |

${N}_{PV}$ | Number of installed PV panels | - |

${C}_{PV}$ | Capacity of a PV unit | kW |

${U}_{PV}$ | Specific cost of PV unit | $/kW |

${C}_{bat}$ | Capacity of installed battery bank | kWh |

${U}_{bat}$ | Specific cost of battery bank | $/kWh |

${C}_{gen}$ | Capacity of installed generator | kW |

${U}_{gen}$ | Specific cost of generator | $/kW |

${N}_{SC}\left(k\right)$ | Number of solar collectors installed | - |

${C}_{SC}$ | Capacity of a solar collector | kW |

${U}_{SC}$ | Specific cost of solar collector | $/kW |

${C}_{SOC}{}_{tank}\left(k\right)$ | Capacity of the installed hot-water tank | kWh |

${U}_{Tank}$ | Specific cost of the hot-water tank | $/kWh |

${C}_{Boiler}\left(k\right)$ | Capacity of the installed boiler | kW |

${U}_{Boiler}$ | Specific cost of the boiler | $/kW |

${C}_{Res}\left(k\right)$ | Capacity of the installed electric resistance | kW |

${U}_{Res}$ | Specific cost of the electric resistance | $/kW |

$fun$ | Percentage of the investment financed by a bank | - |

$Cos{t}_{O\&M}$ | Cost of operation and maintenance of the system | $\$$ |

$Cos{t}_{finan}$ | Fixed-rate loan payment | $\$$ |

$Cos{t}_{Diesel}\left(t\right)$ | Cost of the used diesel | $\$$ |

$Cos{t}_{\mathrm{gas}}\left(t\right)$ | Cost of the used LPG | $\$$ |

$L{L}_{\mathrm{cos}\mathrm{t}}\left(t\right)$ | Cost of the actually unmet load | $\$$ |

${E}_{demand}$ | Total energy demand (electric and thermal) of the system | kWh |

${E}_{demand,net}$ | Net (i.e., after subtracting the lost load) total energy demand | kWh |

${E}_{supply}$ | Total energy supplied by each j-th energy supply technology | kWh |

${\eta}_{overall}$ | Overall system efficiency | - |

## References

- Collier, U. Renewable Heat Policies—Delivering Clean Heat Solutions for the Energy Transition; International Energy Agency: Paris, France, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Lund, H.; Østergaard, P.A.; Connolly, D.; Mathiesen, B.V. Smart energy and smart energy systems. Energy
**2017**, 137, 556–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Mancarella, P. MES ( multi-energy systems): An overview of concepts and evaluation models. Energy
**2014**, 65, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - International Energy Agency. World Energy Outlook 2018; Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD): Paris, France, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Riva, F.; Ahlborg, H.; Hartvigsson, E.; Pachauri, S.; Colombo, E. Electricity access and rural development: Review of complex socio-economic dynamics and casual diagrams for more appropriate energy modelling. Energy Sustain. Dev.
**2018**, 43, 203–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Sahn, D.; Stifel, D. Urban-Rural Inequality in Living Standards in Africa. J. Afr. Econ.
**2003**, 12, 564–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Mandelli, S.; Barbieri, J.; Mereu, R.; Colombo, E. Off-grid systems for rural electrification in developing countries: Definitions, classification and a comprehensive literature review. Renew. Sustain. Energy. Rev.
**2016**, 58, 1621–1646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Kaygusuz, K. Energy services and energy poverty for sustainable rural development. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
**2011**, 15, 936–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ravindra, K.; Agarwal, N.; Kaur-Sidhu, M.; Mor, S. Appraisal of thermal comfort in rural household kitchens of Punjab, India and adaptation strategies for better health. Environ. Int.
**2019**, 124, 431–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - WHO. Household Air Pollution and Health; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Mathiesen, B.V.; Lund, H.; Connolly, D.; Wenzel, H.; Ostergaard, P.A.; Moller, B.; Nielsen, S.; Ridjan, I.; Karnoe, P.; Sperling, K.; et al. Smart Energy Systems for coherent 100% renewable energy and transport solutions. Appl. Energy
**2015**, 145, 139–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Lund, H.; Østergaard, P.A.; Connolly, D.; Ridjan, I.; Mathiesen, B.V.; Hvelplund, F. Energy Storage and Smart Energy Systems. Int. J. Sustain. Energy Plan. Manag.
**2016**, 11, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Good, N.; Mancarella, P. Flexibility in Multi-Energy Communities with Electrical and Thermal Storage: A Stochastic, Robust Approach for Multi-Service Demand Response. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid
**2017**, 10, 503–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - International Energy Agency. Energy Access Outlook 2017—From Poverty to Prosperit; International Energy Agency: Paris, France, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Moretti, L.; Astolfi, M.; Vergara, C.; Macchi, E.; Pérez-Arriaga, J.I.; Manzolini, G. A design and dispatch optimization algorithm based on mixed integer linear programming for rural electrification. Appl. Energy
**2019**, 234, 1104–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Balderrama, S.; Lombardi, F.; Riva, F.; Canedo, W.; Colombo, E.; Quoilin, S. A two-stage linear programming optimization framework for isolated hybrid microgrids in a rural context: The case study of the “El Espino” community. Energy
**2019**, 188, 116073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ciller, P.; De Cuadra, F.; Lumbreras, S. Optimizing Off-Grid Generation in Large-Scale Electrification-Planning Problems: A Direct-Search Approach. Energies
**2019**, 12, 4634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Hirsch, A.; Parag, Y.; Guerrero, J. Microgrids: A review of technologies, key drivers, and outstanding issues. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
**2018**, 90, 402–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Peters, J.; Sievert, M.; Toman, M.A. Rural electrification through mini-grids: Challenges ahead. Energy Policy
**2019**, 132, 27–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Balderrama, J.G.P.; Subieta, S.B.; Lombardi, F.; Stevanato, N.; Sahlberg, A.; Howells, M.; Colombo, E.; Quoilin, S. Incorporating high-resolution demand and techno-economic optimization to evaluate micro-grids into the Open Source Spatial Electrification Tool (OnSSET). Energy Sustain. Dev.
**2020**, 56, 98–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Sinha, S.; Chandel, S. Review of software tools for hybrid renewable energy systems. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
**2014**, 32, 192–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Stevanato, N.; Lombardi, F.; Guidicini, G.; Rinaldi, L.; Balderrama, S.L.; Pavičević, M.; Quoilin, S.; Colombo, E. Long-term sizing of rural microgrids: Accounting for load evolution through multi-step investment plan and stochastic optimization. Energy Sustain. Dev.
**2020**, 58, 16–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Zhao, B.; Zhang, X.; Li, P.; Wang, K.; Xue, M.; Wang, C. Optimal sizing, operating strategy and operational experience of a stand-alone microgrid on Dongfushan Island. Appl. Energy
**2014**, 113, 1656–1666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Díaz, P.; Arias, C.; Pena, R.; Sandoval, D. FAR from the grid: A rural electrification field study. Renew. Energy
**2010**, 35, 2829–2834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Energy Sector Management Assistance Program. Mini Grids for Half a Billion People: Market Outlook and Handbook for Decision Makers; ESMAP Technical Report 014/19 2019; The World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA). Policies and Regulations for Renewable Mini-Grids; International Renewable Energy Agency: Abu Dhabi, UAE, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Mendes, G.; Ioakimidis, C.; Ferrão, P. On the planning and analysis of Integrated Community Energy Systems: A review and survey of available tools. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
**2011**, 15, 4836–4854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Van Ruijven, B.J.; Van Vuuren, D.P.; De Vries, B.J.; Isaac, M.; Van Der Sluijs, J.P.; Lucas, P.L.; Balachandra, P. Model projections for household energy use in India. Energy Policy
**2011**, 39, 7747–7761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - McKenna, E.; Thomson, M. High-resolution stochastic integrated thermal–electrical domestic demand model. Appl. Energy
**2016**, 165, 445–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Pfenninger, S.; Decarolis, J.; Hirth, L.; Quoilin, S.; Staffell, I. The importance of open data and software: Is energy research lagging behind? Energy Policy
**2017**, 101, 211–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - HOMER Energy LLC. HOMER Energy n.d. Available online: https://www.homerenergy.com/ (accessed on 25 September 2020).
- Mashayekh, S.; Stadler, M.; Cardoso, G.; Heleno, M. A mixed integer linear programming approach for optimal DER portfolio, sizing, and placement in multi-energy microgrids. Appl. Energy
**2017**, 187, 154–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Dufo-López, R.; Bernal-Agustín, J.L.; Yusta-Loyo, J.M.; Domínguez-Navarro, J.A.; Ramírez-Rosado, I.J.; Lujano, J.; Aso, I. Multi-objective optimization minimizing cost and life cycle emissions of stand-alone PV–wind–diesel systems with batteries storage. Appl. Energy
**2011**, 88, 4033–4041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Dufo-López, R.; Cristóbal-Monreal, I.R.; Yusta, J.M. Stochastic-heuristic methodology for the optimisation of components and control variables of PV-wind-diesel-battery stand-alone systems. Renew. Energy
**2016**, 99, 919–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Karavas, C.-S.; Kyriakarakos, G.; Arvanitis, K.G.; Papadakis, G. A multi-agent decentralized energy management system based on distributed intelligence for the design and control of autonomous polygeneration microgrids. Energy Convers. Manag.
**2015**, 103, 166–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Karavas, C.-S.; Arvanitis, K.; Papadakis, G. A Game Theory Approach to Multi-Agent Decentralized Energy Management of Autonomous Polygeneration Microgrids. Energies
**2017**, 10, 1756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Karavas, C.-S.; Arvanitis, K.; Kyriakarakos, G.; Piromalis, D.D.; Papadakis, G. A novel autonomous PV powered desalination system based on a DC microgrid concept incorporating short-term energy storage. Sol. Energy
**2018**, 159, 947–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ministerio de Energía. Anuario Estadístico de Energía 2018; CNE: Santiago, Chile, 2018.
- International Energy Agency (IEA). Energy Statistics Manual; International Energy Agency: Paris, France, 2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stevanato, N.; Lombardi, F.; Colmbo, E.; Balderrama, S.; Quoilin, S. Two-Stage Stochastic Sizing of a Rural Micro-Grid Based on Stochastic Load Generation. In Proceedings of the 13th IEEE PowerTech Conference, Milan, Italy, 23–27 June 2019; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lombardi, F.; Balderrama, S.; Quoilin, S.; Colombo, E. Generating high-resolution multi-energy load profiles for remote areas with an open-source stochastic model. Energy
**2019**, 177, 433–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Fischer, D.; Wolf, T.; Scherer, J.; Wille-Haussmann, B. A stochastic bottom-up model for space heating and domestic hot water load profiles for German households. Energy Build.
**2016**, 124, 120–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Caleffi, M. Produzione di acqua calda ad accumulo. In Idraulica; Caleffi: Novara, Italy, 1999; Volume 16. [Google Scholar]
- ASHRAE. 2015 ASHRAE Handbook–Heating, Ventilation and Air-Conditioning Applications; ASHRAE: Peachtree Corners, GA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Stevanato, N.; Pistolese, S.; Lombardi, F.; Rinaldi, L. Multi-Energy Systems Py. 2020. Available online: https://github.com/Stevogallo/MicroGridsPy-MultiEnergy_Paper (accessed on 25 September 2020).
- Dumont, O.; Carmo, C.; Dickes, R.; Emelines, G.; Quoilin, S.; Lemort, V. Hot water tanks : How to select the optimal modelling approach? In Clima 2016; Heiselberg, P.K., Ed.; Aalborg University: Aalborg, Denmark, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Duffie, J.A.; Beckman, W.A. Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]

**Figure 2.**Schematic summary of the four scenarios considered: (

**a**) traditional energy system; (

**b**) conventional micro-grid; (

**c**) multi-good micro-grid; (

**d**) integrated multi-energy system.

**Figure 3.**Schematic representation of the integrated electric and thermal energy system model. The thermal energy system is not a single centralized entity but rather the aggregate of multiple user-scale individual systems, which are modeled for each user within each user class and only connected through the electricity grid, in the absence of a heat distribution network.

**Figure 5.**Thermal load profiles for the four user classes: (

**top right**) domestic; (

**top left**) commercial activities; (

**bottom left**) public offices; and (

**bottom right**) school.

**Figure 6.**Electric energy dispatch strategy in the four modeled scenarios, namely: (

**a**) baseline; (

**b**) conventional micro-grid; (

**c**) multi-good micro-grid; (

**d**) integrated multi-energy system. The represented day is 23rd September 2017. Representative days for all the modeled seasons are reported in the Supplementary Information of this work.

**Figure 7.**Example of thermal energy dispatch for representative single users for each of the four modeled user classes. The represented day is 23rd September 2017. Representative days for all the modeled seasons are reported in the Supplementary Information of this work.

Inputs | Outputs |
---|---|

PV panel output | Optimal system size |

Solar collector output | Net Present Cost (NPC) |

Electric load profile | Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE) |

Thermal load profile | Electric dispatch strategy |

Economic parameters | Thermal dispatch strategy |

Traditional Energy System (Baseline) | Conventional Micro-Grid | Multi-Good Micro-Grid | Integrated Multi-Energy System | |
---|---|---|---|---|

TPES [ktoe] | 467.8 | 322.2 | 362.3 | 442.9 |

Imports [%TPES] | 100% | 77.0% | 16.2% | 6.3% |

Renewables [%TPES] | 0% | 23.0% | 83.8% | 93.7% |

BESS Use [%TFC_el] | 0% | 67.8% | 61.0% | 53.8% |

LCOE [USD/kWh] | 0.259 | 0.220 | 0.198 | 0.090 |

**Table 3.**Summary of installed nominal capacities, total investment, and operations and maintenance (O&M) costs for different energy conversion and storage technologies in the four proposed scenarios.

Traditional Energy System (Baseline) | Conventional Micro-Grid | Multi-Good Micro-Grid | Integrated Multi-Energy System | |
---|---|---|---|---|

PV panels [kW] | - | 320 | 1312 | 321 |

Battery storage [kWh] | - | 1621 | 6257 | 1563 |

Diesel gensets [kW] | 181 | 19 | 159 | 42 |

Solar collectors [kW] | - | - | - | 1703 |

Hot-water tanks [kWh] | - | - | - | 8533 |

LPG boilers [kW] | 1417 | 1417 | - | 1 |

Electric heaters [kW] | - | - | 1467 | 229 |

Total investment cost [MUSD] | 0.18 | 1.68 | 6.24 | 2.56 |

Total O&M cost [MUSD] | 11.55 | 8.31 | 2.74 | 1.53 |

Net Present Cost [MUSD] | 11.73 | 9.98 | 8.98 | 4.09 |

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |

© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Stevanato, N.; Rinaldi, L.; Pistolese, S.; Balderrama Subieta, S.L.; Quoilin, S.; Colombo, E.
Modeling of a Village-Scale Multi-Energy System for the Integrated Supply of Electric and Thermal Energy. *Appl. Sci.* **2020**, *10*, 7445.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app10217445

**AMA Style**

Stevanato N, Rinaldi L, Pistolese S, Balderrama Subieta SL, Quoilin S, Colombo E.
Modeling of a Village-Scale Multi-Energy System for the Integrated Supply of Electric and Thermal Energy. *Applied Sciences*. 2020; 10(21):7445.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app10217445

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Stevanato, Nicolo, Lorenzo Rinaldi, Stefano Pistolese, Sergio Luis Balderrama Subieta, Sylvain Quoilin, and Emanuela Colombo.
2020. "Modeling of a Village-Scale Multi-Energy System for the Integrated Supply of Electric and Thermal Energy" *Applied Sciences* 10, no. 21: 7445.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app10217445