Next Article in Journal
Dynamical Behaviors Analysis of the Rotor Model with Coupling Faults and Applications of the TPOD Method
Next Article in Special Issue
Microbial Activity in Subterranean Ecosystems: Recent Advances
Previous Article in Journal
Prediction of Machine Inactivation Status Using Statistical Feature Extraction and Machine Learning
Previous Article in Special Issue
Occurrence of Fluoroquinolones and Sulfonamides Resistance Genes in Wastewater and Sludge at Different Stages of Wastewater Treatment: A Preliminary Case Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Aeration Mode on Microbial Structure and Efficiency of Treatment of TSS-Rich Wastewater from Meat Processing

by
Piotr Jachimowicz
,
Agnieszka Cydzik-Kwiatkowska
* and
Patrycja Szklarz
Department of Environmental Biotechnology, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-709 Olsztyn, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2020, 10(21), 7414; https://doi.org/10.3390/app10217414
Submission received: 26 August 2020 / Revised: 13 October 2020 / Accepted: 18 October 2020 / Published: 22 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Industrial and Environmental Microbiology)

Abstract

:
The present study investigated the effect of aeration mode on microbial structure and efficiency of treatment of wastewater with a high concentration of suspended solids (TSS) from meat processing in sequencing batch reactors (R). R1 was constantly aerated, while in R2 intermittent aeration was applied. DNA was isolated from biomass and analyzed using next-generation sequencing (NGS) and real-time PCR. As a result, in R1 aerobic granular sludge was cultivated (SVI30 = 44 mL g−1 MLSS), while in R2 a very well-settling mixture of aerobic granules and activated sludge was obtained (SVI30 = 65 mL g−1 MLSS). Intermittent aeration significantly increased denitrification and phosphorus removal efficiencies (68% vs. 43%, 73% vs. 65%, respectively) but resulted in decomposition of extracellular polymeric substances and worse-settling properties of biomass. In both reactors, microbial structure significantly changed in time; an increase in relative abundances of Arenimonas sp., Rhodobacterace, Thauera sp., and Dokdonella sp. characterized the biomass of stable treatment of meat-processing wastewater. Constant aeration in R1 cycle favored growth of glycogen-accumulating Amaricoccus tamworthensis (10.9%) and resulted in 2.4 times and 1.4 times greater number of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and full-denitrifiers genes in biomass, respectively, compared to the R2.

1. Introduction

The meat-processing industry uses about 24% of freshwater consumed by the food and beverage industry and up to 29% of that consumed by the agricultural sector worldwide [1]. About 341.2 million tons of meat were produced globally in year 2018 (63.9 million tons in Europe) [2]. These numbers will increase because world beef, pork, and poultry production are projected to double by 2050 [3]. Meat-processing effluents contain a lot of fats, fibers, proteins, and pathogens but also pharmaceuticals and detergents used for veterinary and cleaning activities [4]. Fats and proteins are main components of the particulate matter in meat-processing wastewater constituting on average 55.3% and 27.1% of dry mass, respectively [5]. Fat and proteins in meat industry wastewaters are usually poorly biodegradable that results in generation of odors, foam, and poor flocculation and settling of biomass that decreases the efficiency of biological processes. Oil and grease adsorb on cell surfaces lowering transfer aqueous phase and pollutant conversion rates [6].
One method that shows promise for treating this difficult-to-treat effluent is the use of granular sludge technology. Granular sludge is a self-immobilized consortium, densely packed with microorganisms used in wastewater treatment reactors [7]. The volumes of reactors with aerobic granular sludge can be smaller than those with activated sludge, because of very good settling properties of granules and a high concentration of microorganisms in their structure. During formation of granules microbial competition and changes in cellular metabolism occur that determine granule morphology and treatment efficiency [8,9].
Granulation depends on numerous factors such as sequencing batch regimes, feeding characteristics, or organic and nitrogen loadings. The presence of aerobic, anoxic and anaerobic zones in the granule structure provides favorable conditions for the growth of both aerobic nitrifiers, and anaerobic and anoxic microorganisms. Granulation process is faster in plug-flow anaerobic feeding reactor than in fully aerobic reactor; however, the granular biomass formed in the fully aerobic configuration is more stable mostly due to better retention of nitrifying organisms favoring nitrogen removal efficiency [10]. Positive effect of anoxic or anaerobic phases in the cycle of granular sequencing batch reactor (GSBR) on nitrogen removal was also observed in other studies [11,12]. There are reports informing that aerobic granular sludge can be successfully applied to treat slaughterhouse wastewater in a lab-scale GSBR [13,14], but studies connecting the efficiency of treatment with in depth analysis of structure of microbial community using next-generation sequencing (NGS) in granules are lacking.
The presence of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) has a significant influence on the physicochemical properties of microbial biomass aggregates, including surface change, structure, flocculation, and settling properties [15]. The aeration conditions influence the production of EPS and it was observed that the content of EPS in biomass decreases under anaerobic conditions [16]. Content of carbohydrates in EPS from biomass from reactors with a high dissolved oxygen level increased with time, whereas the protein content remained unchanged [17]. The protein present in high concentrations in wastewater from meat industry can be incorporated in the bound EPS in biomass [18].
Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore interrelationships between the aeration mode, microbial community composition, and efficiency of nitrogen, phosphorus, organic compounds (COD), and total suspended solids removal in batch reactors treating wastewater from meat-processing industry with a very high concentration of suspended solids. The microbial groups involved in pollutant degradation in constantly and intermittently aerated granules treating TSS-rich meat-processing wastewater were indicated.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Design

Industrial wastewater (Table 1) was obtained from a meat-processing plant in Morliny (Poland) after pre-treatment in a flotation tank. During transport wastewater was stored in ice. The experiment was conducted in two batch reactors with aerobic granular sludge (GSBR) at a room temperature (25 °C). The reactor (Figure 1) had a height to diameter (H/D) ratio of 1.6 and a working volume of 10 L. Volumetric exchange rate of 20% cycle−1 and a cycle length of 6 h was maintained by programmable logic controllers. Air was supplied via aeration grids in the bottom of the reactors. During aeration phases, the up-flow superficial air velocity was 0.5 cm s−1 and the free dissolved oxygen concentration reached saturation. The reactors were inoculated with aerobic granular sludge (AGS) cultivated in a full-scale wastewater treatment plant in Lubawa [19]. The reactor cycle (Figure 1) consisted of 10 min of settling, 30 min of filling and decantation, and 320 min of reaction phase. R1 was constantly aerated, while R2 was intermittently aerated, with 30 min non-aerated phases, after every 60 min of aeration. The operational parameters of the reactors favored formation of aerobic granules.
During reactor operation, pollutants concentration was analyzed both in the influent and the effluent. Additionally, to determine the variance of pollutant concentrations within the reactor cycle. Measurements were performed in duplicate every half hour during the period of stable reactor performance. The experiment was conducted for 200 cycles. For efficiency calculations, the technological results from the last 50 cycles of stable reactor operation were used.

2.2. Analytical Methods

The reactors wastewater and biomass were analyzed in accordance with APHA [20]; the sludge volumetric index was measured after 30 min of settling (SVI30). The oxygen concentration in the reactor was measured using a YSI ProODO™ probe (YSI). Chemical analyzes of the influent and effluent from wastewater included COD, BOD, VFA, N-NH4, N-NO2, N-NO3, and P-PO4. Alkalinity, and pH were measured using TitroLine easy (Donserv). All analyses were conducted in triplicate.
Granule morphology and size was evaluated using wet sieving (water temperature 12 °C) in an AS 200 screening unit (Retsch) using sieves with mesh sizes of 1 mm, 710 μm, 500 μm, 355 μm, 125 μm, 90 μm and 40 μm. Sieving lasted for 10 min with a vibration amplitude of 50 mm.
Soluble (Sol-EPS), loosely bound (LB-EPS) and tightly bound (TB-EPS) extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) were isolated from the biomass collected from the reactors at the beginning (25 min) and end (269 min) of the cycle as described in Rusanowska et al. [21]. Concentration of proteins (PN) and polysaccharides (PS) in particular fractions of EPS was measured according to Frølund et al. [22], and Lowry methods, respectively.

2.3. Next-Generation Sequencing

For molecular analyses of the granular sludge microbiome, sludge from the two reactors was sampled at the beginning of the experiment and after 56, 128, and 164 cycles and stored at −20 °C. DNA was isolated in triplicate using a FastDNA®SPIN kit for soil (MPBiomedicals, Irvine, CA, USA) and its purity and concentration was measured using a NanoDrop spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Then the DNA isolated from these three samples was pooled together for further analyses. The 939F/1492R primer set (5′-TTGACGGGGGCCCGCAC-3′/5′-TACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′) was used to amplify the V6 and V8 regions of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene. Sequencing of amplicons using the Illumina MiSeq platform was performed at Research and Testing Laboratory (USA). Sequencing results were deposited in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA, BioProject PRJNA613085). Depending on the sample, from 7237 to 26594 sequences were obtained (Appendix A Table A1). The sequences were analyzed bioinformatically as described in Świątczak et al. [23]. To characterize microbial diversity at the species level, the Shannon-Wiener (H’) index of diversity was calculated [24].

2.4. Real-Time PCR

Real-time PCR was performed to assess the absolute abundance of total bacteria (16S rRNA gene), ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (amoA gene), and denitrifiers (nosZ gene) in aerobic granules. Standard curves for analysis of the copy number of the amoA and nosZ genes were constructed using a plasmid with a cloned insert (PCR product of known size) using the Clone Jet PCR cloning kit (Thermo Scientific) and freshly prepared, chemically competent Escherichia coli 109 (Promega) for cloning. In all clones the presence of the insert was confirmed by PCR with appropriate primers (Appendix A Table A1). To construct a standard curve for absolute quantification of total bacteria, DNA isolated from E. coli 109 (Promega) was used. The reaction mixture for real-time PCR contained 5 ng/μL of the template DNA, 10 μL of Maxima SYBR Green/ROXqPCR Master Mix (2×) (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), primers (concentrations are given in Appendix A Table A2) and ultrapure water for a final volume of 20 μL. The amplification reaction began with 2 min at 50 °C and 10 min at 95 °C; then 40 cycles of amplification proceeded according to the thermal profiles given in Appendix A Table A2. Reactions were carried out in a 7500 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems) and data were analyzed with Sequence Detection Software, version 1.3 (Applied Biosystems). Reactions were normalized by adding the same amount of DNA to each reaction tube. To confirm reaction specificity, the positive and negative controls were performed. To confirm the melting temperature of PCR products, dissociation step and agarose electrophoresis in the presence of a molecular marker were performed.

2.5. Statistics

For statistical analysis, STATISTICA 13.1 software (StatSoft) was used. A value of p ≤ 0.05 was defined as significant.
Normality and the homogeneity of variance were examined using the Shapiro–Wilk and the Levene’s tests, respectively. If these assumptions were correct, Student’s t-test was used to test the differences between the means. Technological results and abundance of microorganisms were correlated using Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Links between technological parameters (cycle number and the number of anoxic phases in the reactor cycle) and microbial structure were assessed with Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) with Monte Carlo permutation testing (F statistics, 499 permutations). The analyses were conducted using CANOCO for Windows ver. 5.0 and CANODRAW [25].

3. Results and Discussion

The obtained results indicate that in the constantly aerated reactor, aerobic granule formation was favored, whereas in the intermittently aerated reactor, a mixture of aerobic granules and activated sludge flocks was obtained. The average biomass concentration in R1 was 4.6 ± 0.9 g MLSS L−1 and that in R2 was 3.4 ± 1.5 g MLSS L−1, but the concentration of TSS in the effluent was nearly 2 times higher in R2 than in R1 (0.20 g L−1 TSS vs. 0.11 g L−1 TSS). The higher concentration of biomass in R2 may have resulted from organics being used, not for biomass growth, but for more efficient denitrification and phosphorus removal than in R1. The SVI30 was higher in R2 (65 mL g−1 MLSS) than in R1 (44 mL g−1 MLSS). Aerobic granules exhibit low SVI values (<50 mL/g MLSS), which is in sharp contrast to activated sludge, in which SVI values exceed 120 mL/g MLSS [9].
In the biomass from R1, granules with sizes from 90 to 125 μm predominated, constituting about 25.1% of the biomass, and granules with diameters over 1 mm were observed (Figure 2). In R2, about 50.0% of the biomass consisted of granules smaller than 90 μm. Both the superficial air velocity and the oxygen concentration affect aerobic granulation [26]. Tay et al. [27], reported that a higher shear force resulting from a higher superficial air velocity supported formation of more compact, denser, and stronger aerobic granules. The relatively low air velocity in the present experiment (0.5 cm s−1) and the reduced oxygen concentration in R2 worsened the settling properties of the biomass and precluded full granulation of the biomass. The size and formation of stable aerobic granules correlates with the efficiency of pollutant removal because low air velocity favors selection of slow-growing organisms [28]. In a study involving the treatment of slaughterhouse wastewater, the size of granules ranged from 0.6 to 1.2 mm, which favored a high abundance of ammonium-oxidizing bacteria [13]. In the present study, the larger granule diameters in R1 explain the greater abundance of nitrifiers in this biomass, as indicated by amoA gene analysis, and the higher nitrification rate. A study by Luo et al. [29], revealed that larger granules possess a higher microbial biodiversity than smaller granules. On the one hand, increasing granule size decreases the surface/volume ratio, resulting in a higher surface loading of pollutants, which may affect aerobic transformations in the biomass. In larger granules, the depth to which oxygen permeates will be less than in smaller granules, and larger anaerobic/anoxic zones will be present, which provide spaces for the growth of denitrifying bacteria. In contrast, in smaller granules, which have a larger surface/volume ratio, oxygen can permeate deeper than in larger granules and provide more aerobic zones for the growth of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB).
In the present study, large changes in the structure of microorganisms colonizing the inoculum and biomass (Figure 3) were noted throughout the experiment. Weissbrodt et al. [30] also observed that during the granulation of activated sludge, the percentage of Competibacter sp. increased, and bacteria of the Xanthomonadaceae, Rhodospirillaceae, and Aminobacter families appeared. According to those authors, the occurrence of bacteria such as Zoogloea sp., Xanthomonadaceae, Sphingomonadales, and Rhizobiales promotes the formation of EPS, which are responsible for biomass granulation. In the present study, Dokdonella sp. were found to be responsible for the formation of EPS and denitrification in biomass. The presence of microorganisms from the above-mentioned families promotes granulation and affects the strength of the resulting granules.
The quality of the treated wastewater in the present study indicates that systems with aerobic granules can successfully treat TSS-rich wastewater from the meat industry. Organic compounds were removed with a very high efficiency in both reactors (above 94%). This indicates that periodic decreases in oxygen concentration during the reactor cycle, which resulted from intermittent aeration, did not reduce the efficiency of organics removal.
The average COD concentrations were 91.6 ± 13.5 mg L−1 and 115.6 ± 43.6 mg L−1 in the outflows from R1 and R2, respectively, but COD removal was more stable in R1 (Figure 4). The COD removal rate was similar in both reactors (197.1 mg (L h−1) vs. 194.6 mg (L h−1) in R1 and R2, respectively). The carbon source that is available in wastewater affects the composition of the microbiological community. De Sousa Rollemberg et al. [31], observed that in a reactor to which acetate was dosed, microorganisms from the genera Flavobacterium (30%), Thauera (15%) and Aquimonas (12%) dominated. In a reactor to which ethanol was dosed, Paracoccus sp. (36%), Fluviicola sp. (20%) and Sediminibacterium sp. (9%) dominated, while addition of glucose resulted in the growth of numerous polyphosphate-accumulating organisms (PAOs) belonging to the taxa Cryomorphaceae, Rhodobacteraceae, Cytophagaceae, and Saprospiraceae. Acetate is the main source of carbon in wastewater from the meat industry, which may explain the high percentage of Thauera sp. (up to 20.1%) in the granules in the present study.
The average N-NH4 concentration in each effluent was around 1 mg L−1 (Figure 4). The efficiencies of ammonium nitrogen removal were 82 and 86% in R1 and R2, respectively, which is similar to the efficiency obtained by Ersan and Erguder [32], in a granular sludge batch reactor fed with wastewater with a COD/N ratio of 15:2 and operated with anoxic phases. The concentration of N-NO2 in the effluents was low (0.03 ± 0.05 mg L−1 vs. 0.12 ± 0.12 mg L−1 in R1 and R2, respectively). The average concentration of N-NO3 in the outflow from R2 was significantly lower than that in the outflow from R1 (3.6 ± 1.5 mg L−1 vs. 7.0 ± 3.2 mg L−1). Correspondingly, denitrification efficiency was higher in R2 than in R1 (68% vs. 43%). The environmental conditions favored the growth of aerobic denitrifiers; for example, Pseudomonas sp. and Paracoccus sp., which can increase the efficiency of denitrification under aerobic conditions, were identified in the analyzed biomass [33].
In the present study, although the overall efficiency of ammonium nitrogen removal was very similar in both reactors, the ammonium removal rate was more than three times higher in the intermittently aerated reactor (9.4 mg/(L h−1)) than in the constantly aerated one (3.2 mg/(L h−1). This indicates that ammonium nitrogen oxidation is stimulated by anoxic conditions. It has been reported that increasing the number of anaerobic phases in the reactor cycle increased the total number of bacteria (as shown by abundance of 16S rRNA gene), the number of AOB bacteria involved in nitrification (amoA gene abundance) and the number of complete denitrifiers (nosZ gene abundance) [34]. In the present study, such increases were not observed; however, the share of such taxa as Thauera sp., Dokdonella ginsengisoli, and Lysobacter daejeonensis, which participate in nitrogen transformations, was higher in the reactor with intermittent aeration than in the one with constant aeration. In both reactors, low concentrations of N-NO2 (below 1 mg L−1) were only observed in the first hour of the cycle. In R1, the N-NO3 concentration increased during the first two hours of the working cycle, after which it remained at a few mg L−1. In R2, its concentration initially increased to 5.86 mg/(L h−1), and then it was removed at different rates in subsequent non-aerated phases (22.5 mg (L h−1), 15.7 mg (L h−1), and 23.6 mg (L h−1) in phases 1, 2, and 3, respectively) (Figure 5).
Due to intermittent aeration of R2, the concentration of orthophosphates in the effluent from that reactor was significantly lower than that in the effluent from R1 (6.5 ± 2.9 mg L−1 vs. 8.6 ± 1.7 mg L−1, Figure 5). As a result, the removal efficiencies were 73% and 65%, respectively. A low oxygen concentration stimulates removal of COD, N and P due to heterotrophic growth inside granules consisting mostly of DPAO (denitrifying PAO) [35]. It has also been reported that lower phosphorus removal performance was often observed at high dissolved oxygen (DO) concentrations of 5.0 mg/L, while DO concentrations of approximately 2.5–3.0 mg/L seemed to be associated with the dominance of PAOs [36]. Taking into account the specific characteristics of wastewater from the meat industry and the lack of strict anaerobic phases, P removal was satisfactory and similar to the efficiencies obtained in other studies conducted in either constantly aerated granular batch reactors (83%) [14].
Presence of high concentrations of volatile fatty acids (VFA) stimulates PAOs to take up VFAs anaerobically and convert them to intracellular poly-β-hydroxyalkanoates (PHAs). PAOs gain the energy and reducing power required for anaerobic VFA uptake and conversion to PHA through the hydrolysis of their intracellularly stored polyphosphate (poly-P) and glycogen [37]. In the present study, PAO belonging to Tetrasphaera sp., Arenimonas sp., and Pseudomonas sp. [38,39], were identified and their presence was much higher in R2. In R1 percentage of Amaricoccus tamworthensis gradually increased. Falvo et al. [40], point out that Amaricoccus sp. in pure culture failed to synthesize poly-P aerobically but they could synthesize glycogen aerobically, they did not assimilate either acetate or glucose anaerobically, and PHAs synthesis occurred aerobically but not anaerobically. Glycogen-accumulating organisms (GAOs) are a bacterial group capable of competing with PAOs for VFA in wastewater. In the present study the most numerous GAO was Candidatus Competibacter that was present in both reactors [41].
The pH of the effluents was 8.4 and 8.2 in R1 and R2, respectively. The wastewater pH is considered to be a critical factor impacting N2O emission. Hynes and Knowles [42] had pointed out that the maximum emission of N2O was observed at pH 8.5 and decreased with decreasing pH, which can impact of nosZ gene abundance in the present study. Alkalinity of the effluent from R1 (7.2 ± 0.5 mval L−1) was significantly lower than from R2 (to 8.5 ± 0.5 mval L−1) pointing to more efficient recovery of alkalinity during denitrification in R2 than in R1. Even though the alkalinity was low, ammonium nitrogen was efficiently oxidized during the reactor cycle.
The distribution of EPS in the structure of granules plays an important role in improving the stability of the aerobic granular sludge and affects its SVI [43]. Extracellular polymers (EPS) were isolated from the aerobic granules at the beginning and end of the reactor cycle. The PN and PS concentrations in the three isolated EPS fractions are presented in Figure 6. In granules from R1, content of PN and PS in Sol- and LB-EPS remained at a similar level in the GBSR cycle, but increased about 2 times at the end of the cycle in case of TB-EPS (Figure 6). In R2 a significant decrease in PN concentration in Sol- and LB-EPS was observed at the end of the cycle that was accompanied by a slight increase in PN and PS concentrations in TB-EPS (Figure 6). PN and PS are the main components of EPS in aerobic granules. For granulation, the ratio of PN to PS in EPS is more important than their quantity in a given microbiological structure [44]. A high PN/PS ratio in EPS was observed in aerobic granules with very good settling properties [45]. Decreasing the amount of PN relative to PS decreases the consistency of granules, causes problems with biomass sedimentation and increase the risk of filamentous bacteria growth and sludge bulking [46]. It has been shown that the PN/PS ratio depends on the C/N ratio in the influent. For example, Zhang et al. [47], conducted research with C/N ratios of 5 and 15 in the wastewater fed to reactors. At the 15 C/N ratio, which was lower than C/N ratio used in our study (about 24), the PN/PS ratio in EPS was significantly lower than at the 5 C/N ratio, and granules with poorer settling and pollutant removal capacity were cultivated.
In the present study, the PN/PS ratio was low and remained at around 1 in both reactors at the beginning of the cycle. The largest changes in EPS concentration took place in the TB-EPS fraction. The PN and PS concentrations in TB-EPS at the beginning of the cycle was similar in both reactors but increased more than 1.5-time in R1 in comparison with R2 at the end of the cycle, which explains much better settling properties of granules from R1. Higher concentration of TB-EPS at the end of R1 cycle can be caused by the fact that in continuously aerated reactors, microorganisms use available carbon sources mainly for biomass and EPS synthesis. In intermittently aerated reactors, in contrast, they use more of the available carbon for denitrification and phosphorus removal. Up to 50% of the EPS in aerobic granular sludge can be used in the starvation phase and anaerobic conditions [48]. The high increase in PN in TB-EPS fraction at the end of the reactor cycle was advantageous for granules stability. Both TB-EPS and LB-EPS can support the aggregation of neighboring cells in AGS formation; however, LB-EPS does not bind cells together as strongly as TB-EPS and it can be more easily destroyed, which leads to the destruction of the granule structure [49].
Real-time PCR was used to estimate the total number of bacteria (16S rRNA gene copy number), the number of gene for amoA (ammonium monooxygenase gene) enzyme of AOB and full denitrifiers (nitrous oxide reductase gene nosZ) in granules during reactor operation (Figure 7). Standard curves were made showing the relationship between the Ct threshold value and logarithm of the number of gene copies in the tested biomass. The curves were linear in the studied range of gene copy numbers, and the reactors determination coefficient was 0.99, 0.98 and 0.99 for the 16S rRNA, amoA, and nosZ genes, respectively. The number of gene copies in the above studies was referred to 5 ng DNA (unit of sample).
The abundance of the 16S rRNA genes in the biomass of both reactors gradually decreased as the experiment was carried out. The largest number of 16S rRNA genes was recorded in the inoculum (1.4 × 107 copies/5 ng DNA). The number of copies of the 16S rRNA in mature granules at 164th cycle was at a level of 9.52 × 106/5 ng DNA and 6.75 × 106 copies/5 ng DNA in R1 and R2, respectively.
The abundance of bacteria with the ammonium monooxygenase (amoA) gene in the inoculum was 4.46 × 102copies/5 ng DNA. A rapid increase in the number of copies of the amoA gene was observed in R1 at the beginning of the experiment, and during the experiment the number of copies remained in the range of 3.00–3.66 × 103copies/5 ng DNA. In R2, the highest number of the investigated genes (2.49 × 103 copies/5 ng DNA) was recorded in 56th cycle of experiment. At the end of the experiment, the number of ammonium monooxygenase gene in biomass from R1 was 2.4 times higher than in R2. The copy number of the nitrous oxide reductase (nosZ) gene in DNA isolated from the inoculum was 1.48 × 104 copies/5 ng DNA. In R1, the number of compiled denitrifying bacteria increased in the 56th cycle of reactor operation to 3.17 × 104 copies/5 ng DNA which could improve the nosZ gene expression and lead to higher emission of N2 [46]. After that, this value slowly decreased to 1.35 × 104 copies/5 ng DNA (164th cycle). In R2, the number of copies of the nosZ gene increased to 5.41 × 104 copies/5 ng DNA in the 56th cycle of the experiment thus the number of denitrification bacteria was 41% higher in the R2 than in R1. After this time, a reverse tendency was observed and at the end of the experiment the copy number of the investigated gene in biomass was about 1.4-time higher in R1 than R2.
Thwaites et al. [50], observed that the highest number of nitrifiers was recorded in the reactor with constant aeration but the introduction of a 60-min anaerobic phase into the working cycle lowered the number of nitrifiers while the highest number of denitrifying bacteria (nosZ gene analysis) characterized biomass from a reactor with a short 20-min anaerobic phase in the cycle. The highest efficiency of nitrogen removal from wastewater was obtained in the reactor with constant aeration (89%), while the lowest in the reactor with the initial 60-min anaerobic phase (58%). In the presented study, a lower number of denitrification bacteria in R2 was observed despite a higher denitrification efficiency. This may be because denitrification numbers were estimated based on the nosZ gene analysis. Abundance of complete denitrifiers possessing nosZ gene in biomass is favorable because ensures full conversion of nitrogen compounds to N2 and reduction in greenhouse gas emissions such as NO and N2O [51]. Complete denitrification can be carried out by bacteria from the genera Dokdonella, Flavobacterium, Acinetobacter, Pseudomonas, Arcobacter, and Comamonas, while microorganisms carrying out partial denitrification belong to genera Diaphorobacter, Thauera and Zoogloea [52]. In the present study, in the biomass treating wastewater from the meat industry bacteria from genera Dokdonella (Dokdonella ginsengisoli) and Thauera (Thauera sp.) predominated. Microorganisms from the genera Pseudomonas, Burkholderia (Burkholderia sp.), Geobacter, and Rhizobium were also found in the biomass from R2. These microorganisms have norB gene in their genomes, which product is responsible for the conversion of nitric oxide to nitrous oxide and can support the denitrification process. An increase in the occurrence of Paracoccus sp. was also noted at the end of the experiment in both reactors. Paracoccus sp. uses methanol as the carbon source and can denitrify at a high rate (250 mg NO3/g TSS h−1) [53,54]. The high percentage of unclassified microorganisms in R2 indicates that more variable microenvironments created in biomass by intermittent aeration favored growth of yet not classified bacteria and resulted in higher microbial biodiversity.
Bacterial consortia in aerobic granules were analyzed using NGS to draw conclusion about the relationships between their structure and aeration mode in the reactor. The total number of 118,579 16S rRNA sequence reads assigned to different operational taxonomic units was obtained by Illumina MiSeq platform (Appendix A Table A2).
To assess the within–sample complexity of microbial population, the Shannon-Wiener diversity index (H’) was evaluated. The Shannon-Wiener species diversity index in inoculum was 3.67. At the final stage of the experiment the index was by about 8% higher in R2 (3.67) compared to R1 (3.39).
At a species level (Table 1), the most abundant in inoculum was Dokdonella ginsengisoli (19.6%), Tetrasphaera sp. (3.8%), Lysobacter daejeonensis (3.7%), Terrimonas arctica (3.3%) and Candidatus Competibacter (3.2%). In R1 at the end of the experiment, biomass was dominated by Dokdonella ginsengisoli (20.0%), Amaricoccus tamworthensis (10.9%), Thauera sp. (10.7%), Candidatus Competibacter sp. (5.1%) and Arenimonas sp. (4.1%). Dokdonella ginsengisoli (16.0%), Candidatus Competibacter (7.7%), Arenimonas sp. (2.5%) and Thauera sp. (2.4%) dominated also at the end of the experiment in R2.
During the experiment disappearance or reduction of the percentage was observed for Acidobacterium sp., Tetrasphaera sp., Terrimonas arctica, Roseiflexus sp., Ignavibacterium sp., Ottowia sp., Rhodoferax sp., Nannocystis sp., Tolumonas sp., Aquimonas sp. and Lysobacter daejeonensis.
In the present research, large changes in the structure of microorganisms colonizing the inoculum and granular sludge were noted throughout the experiment. Weissbrodt et al. [30], observed that during the granulation of activated sludge the percentage of Competibacter sp. increased and bacteria of the Xanthomonadaceae, Rhodospirillaceae, and Aminobacter family appeared. According to the authors, occurrence of such bacteria as Zoogloea sp., Xanthomonadaceae, Sphingomonadales, and Rhizobiales promotes the formation of EPS that are responsible for biomass granulation. In the present study, Xanthomonadaceae (Dokdonella ginsengisoli, Lysobacter daejeonensis) were found to be responsible for the formation of EPS and denitrification in biomass. The presence of microorganisms from the above-mentioned families promotes granulation and affects the strength of the resulting granules.
Bacterial taxa unique for the biomass from R1 were identified including e.g., Pseudonocardia babensis, Amaricoccus tamworthensis, Paracoccus sp., Paracoccus yeei, Arenimonas sp. Many environmental bacteria isolated, among others, from water and soil possess the ability to break down fats, oils and greases [55]. The presence of complex compounds such as proteins, lipids or polysaccharides in wastewater stimulates growth of microorganisms in the biomass that carry out the hydrolysis of complex organic compounds, e.g., Sphingobacteriales, Chitinophagaceae, or Flavobacterium sp., which were also observed in the presented studies. In the granules, Burkholderia sp., and Pseudomonas sp. have been also identified that can break down lipids to fatty acids [56,57]. In the structure of aerobic granules, lipids occur peripherally in EPS, thus, the fats in the influent may attach to the surface of the granules and impede the transfer of oxygen deep into its structure increasing the demand of oxygen for microorganisms [58].
The ordination diagram (Figure 8) shows that at the level of the species variable aeration conditions in the reactor cycle did not affect the composition of microbiota (p = 0.18, F = 1.66), while the number of reactor working cycles significantly affected it (p < 0.01, F = 3.61). There was a strong positive correlation between the percentage share in the biomass of Gemmobacter sp. (R = 0.98), Flexibacter sp. (R = 0.96), Paracoccus yeei (R = 0.85) and Rhodobacter sp. (R = 0.97) and the experimental cycle indicating that these taxa were important for efficient treatment of meat-processing wastewater. A negative correlation was observed, among others, for Ignavibacterium sp. (R = −0.96), Roseiflexus sp. (R = −0.94) and Tolumonas sp. (R = −0.92).

4. Conclusions

The research allowed to draw the following conclusions:
-
In an intermittently aerated reactor fed with high-TSS wastewater from meat industry higher N and P removal and a higher concentration of biomass was observed, but also a higher concentration of suspended solids in treated wastewater, smaller diameters of granules and deteriorated settling properties of biomass mainly as a result of the reduction of EPS content in biomass was noted;
-
CCA analysis showed that microbial structure significantly changed in time; an increase in abundances of Arenimonas sp., Thauera sp., and Dokdonella sp. characterized mature granules in period of stable treatment of meat-processing wastewater;
-
Constant aeration in the cycle increases the number of nitrifying and denitrifying genes in biomass (amoA and nosZ analysis) while intermittent aeration increases microbial diversity of granules;
-
Constant aeration favored growth of microorganisms from the Rhodanobacteraceae, Rhodobacteraceae and Xanthomonadaceae families while in intermittently aerated reactors Competibacteraceae family was more abundant (7.8%) and appeared.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.J., and A.C.-K.; methodology, P.J. and A.C.-K.; software, P.J.; validation, P.J.; formal analysis, P.J., and A.C.-K.; investigation, P.J., and P.S.; resources, P.J.; data curation, P.J., and A.C.-K.; writing—Original draft preparation, P.J.; writing—Review and editing, A.C.-K. and P.S.; visualization, P.J.; supervision, A.C.-K.; project administration, P.J.; funding acquisition, A.C.-K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Minister of Science and Higher Education grant number 010/RID/2018/19 and Development Program at the University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn grant number POWR.03.05. 00-00-Z310/17.

Acknowledgments

Project financially supported by Minister of Science and Higher Education in the range of the program entitled “Regional Initiative of Excellence” for the years 2019–2022, Project No. 010/RID/2018/19, amount of funding 12,000,000 PLN and was written as a result of the author’s internship in Aalborg University, Denmark, co-financed by the European Union under the European Social Fund (Operational Program Knowledge Education Development), carried out in the project Development Program at the University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn (POWR.03.05. 00-00-Z310/17).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Figure A1. Changes of oxygen concentration in reactors cycle in (A) reactor R1 and (B) R2. Gray shading indicates phases without aeration.
Figure A1. Changes of oxygen concentration in reactors cycle in (A) reactor R1 and (B) R2. Gray shading indicates phases without aeration.
Applsci 10 07414 g0a1
Table A1. Primers and conditions applied in real-time PCR.
Table A1. Primers and conditions applied in real-time PCR.
Gene, PrimerPrimer ConcentrationSize of Amplicon (bp)Thermal ProfileReference
amoA (amoA1Fa/amoA2R)100 nM~50094 °C/15 s, 52 °C/45 s, 60 °C/45 s[59]
Bacterial 16S rRNA (519F/907R)100 nM~60094 °C/15 s, 50 °C/40 s, 60 °C, 40 s[60]
nosZ (NosZ-F/NosZ1622R)200 nM~50094 °C/15 s, 60 °C/2.5 min[61,62]
Table A2. Diversity indices from aerobic granular sludge sample in reactorss.
Table A2. Diversity indices from aerobic granular sludge sample in reactorss.
ReactorNumber of CycleNumber of SequencesNumber of OTUShannon-Wiener Index (H’)
Inoculum096759943.67
R15620,3608733.22
12818,3366542.26
16426,5949013.39
R25621,6999473.02
12872377403.59
16414,67810313.67

References

  1. Gerbens-Leenes, P.W.; Mekonnen, M.M.; Hoekstra, A.Y. The water footprint of poultry, pork and beef: A comparative study in different countries and production systems. Water Resour. Ind. 2013, 1–2, 25–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. The Food and Agriculture Organization. Available online: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en (accessed on 1 August 2020).
  3. Pingali, P. Westernization of Asian diets and the transformation of food systems: Implications for research and policy. Food Policy 2007, 32, 281–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bustillo-Lecompte, C.F.; Mehrvar, M.; Quinones-Bolanos, E. Cost-effectiveness analysis of TOC removal from slaughterhouse wastewater using combined anaerobic-aerobic and UV/H2O2 processes. J. Environ. Manag. 2014, 134, 145–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kiepper, B.H.; Merka, W.C.; Fletcher, D.L. Proximate composition of poultry processing wastewater particulate matter from broiler slaughter plants. Poult. Sci. 2008, 87, 1633–1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cammarota, M.C.; Freire, D.G. A review on hydrolytic enzymes in the treatment of wastewater with high oil and grease content. Bioresour. Technol. 2006, 97, 2195–2210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Gao, D.; Liu, L.; Liang, H.; Wu, W.M. Aerobic granular sludge: Characterization, mechanism of granulation and application to wastewater treatment. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2011, 31, 137–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Liu, Y.; Yang, S.F.; Tay, J.H. Improved stability of aerobic granules by selecting slow-growing nitrifying bacteria. J. Biotechnol. 2004, 108, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Cydzik-Kwiatkowska, A.; Zielińska, M. Bacterial communities in full-scale wastewater treatment systems. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 32, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Carrera, P.; Campo, R.; Méndez, R.; Di Bella, G.; Campos, J.L.; Mosquera-Corral, A.; Val del Río, A. Does the feeding strategy enhance the aerobic granular sludge stability treating saline effluents? Chemosphere 2019, 226, 865–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Chen, F.Y.; Liu, Y.Q.; Tay, J.H.; Ning, P. Alternating anoxic/oxic condition combined with step-feeding mode for nitrogen removal in granular sequencing batch reactors (GSBRs). Sep. Purif. Technol. 2013, 105, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cydzik-Kwiatkowska, A.; Wojnowska-Baryła, I. Nitrogen-converting communities in aerobic granules at different hydraulic retention times (HRTs) and operational modes. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 31, 75–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Liu, Y.; Kang, X.; Li, X.; Yuan, Y. Performance of aerobic granular sludge in a sequencing batch bioreactor for slaughterhouse wastewater treatment. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 190, 487–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Cassidy, D.P.; Belia, E. Nitrogen and phosphorus removal from an abattoir wastewater in a SBR with aerobic granular sludge. Water Res. 2005, 39, 4817–4823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wingender, J.; Neu, T.R.; Flemming, H.C. (Eds.) Microbial Extracellular Polymeric Substances: Characterization, Structures and Function; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1999; pp. 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  16. Sheng, G.P.; Yu, H.Q.; Li, X.Y. Extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) of microbial aggregates in biological wastewater treatment systems: A review. Biotechnol. Adv. 2010, 28, 882–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Shin, H.S.; Kang, S.T.; Nam, S.Y. Effect of carbohydrate and protein in the EPS on sludge settling characteristics. Water Sci. Technol. 2001, 43, 193–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sponza, D.T. Investigation of extracellular polymer substances (EPS) and physicochemical properties of different activated sludge flocs under steady-state conditions. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2003, 32, 375–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Świątczak, P.; Cydzik-Kwiatkowska, A. Performance and microbial characteristics of biomass in a full-scale aerobic granular sludge wastewater treatment plant. Environ. Sci. Pollut. 2017, 25, 1655–1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. APHA (Ed.) 1992 Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 18th ed.; APHA: Washington, DC, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  21. Rusanowska, P.; Cydzik-Kwiatkowska, A.; Świątczak, P.; Wojnowska-Baryła, I. Changes in extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) content and composition in aerobic granule size-fractions during reactor cycles at different organic loads. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 272, 188–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Frølund, B.; Griebe, T.; Nielsen, P.H. Enzymatic activity in the activated-sludge floc matrix. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1995, 43, 755–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Świątczak, P.; Cydzik-Kwiatkowska, A.; Rusanowska, P. Microbiota of anaerobic digesters in a full-scale wastewater treatment plant. Arch. Environ. Prot. 2017, 43, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Hill, M.O. Diversity and evenness: A unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology 1973, 54, 427–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Ter Braak, C.J.F.; Šmilauer, P. Canoco 5: Software for multivariate data exploration, testing and summarization. In Biometrics; Plant Research International: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  26. Mosquera-Corral, A.; De Kreuk, M.K.; Heijnen, J.J.; Van Loosdrecht, M.C. Effects of oxygen concentration on N-removal in an aerobic granular sludge reactor. Water Res. 2005, 39, 2676–2686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Tay, J.H.; Liu, Q.S.; Liu, Y. The effect of upflow air velocity on the structure of aerobic granules cultivated in a sequencing batch reactor. Water Sci. Technol. 2004, 49, 35–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. De Kreuk, M.K.; Pronk, M.; Van Loosdrecht, M.C. Formation of aerobic granules and conversion processes in an aerobic granular sludge reactor at moderate and low temperatures. Water Res. 2005, 39, 4476–4484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Luo, J.; Chen, H.; Han, X.; Sun, Y.; Yuan, Z.; Guo, J. Microbial community structure and biodiversity of size-fractionated granules in a partial nitritation–anammox process. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2005, 93, fix021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Weissbrodt, D.G.; Neu, T.R.; Kuhlicke, U.; Rappaz, Y.; Holliger, C. Assessment of bacterial and structural dynamics in aerobic granular biofilms. Front. Microbiol. 2013, 4, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. De Sousa Rollemberg, S.; De Oliveira, L.; Barros, A.; Melo, V.; Firmino, P.; Dos Santos, A. Effects of carbon source on the formation, stability, bioactivity and biodiversity of the aerobic granule sludge. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 278, 195–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Erşan, Y.Ç.; Erguder, T.H. The effect of seed sludge type on aerobic granulation via anoxic–aerobic operation. Environ. Technol. 2014, 35, 2928–2939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ji, B.; Yang, K.; Zhu, L.; Jiang, Y.; Wang, H.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, H. Aerobic denitrification: A review of important advances of the last 30 years. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 2015, 20, 643–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Cydzik-Kwiatkowska, A.; Rusanowska, P.; Zielińska, M.; Bernat, K.; Wojnowska-Baryła, I. Microbial structure and nitrogen compound conversions in aerobic granular sludge reactors with non-aeration phases and acetate pulse feeding. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 24857–24870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Griffiths, P.C.; Stratton, H.M.; Seviour, R.J. Environmental factors contributing to 385 the “G bacteria” population in full-scale EBPR plants. Water Sci. Technol. 2002, 4–5, 185–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zeng, R.J.; Yuan, Z.; Keller, J. Improved understanding of the interactions and complexities of biological nitrogen and phosphorus removal processes. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biol. 2004, 3, 265–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Nielsen, P.H.; Mielczarek, A.T.; Kragelund, C. A conceptual ecosystem model of microbial communities in enhanced biological phosphorus removal plants. Water Res. 2010, 44, 5070–5088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Ge, H.; Batstone, D.J.; Keller, J. Biological phosphorus removal from abattoir wastewater at very short sludge ages mediated by novel PAO clade Comamonadaceae. Water Res. 2015, 69, 173–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Mandel, A.; Zekker, I.; Jaagura, M.; Tenno, T. Enhancement of anoxic phosphorus uptake of denitrifying phosphorus removal process by biomass adaption. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 16, 5965–5978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Falvo, A.; Levantesi, C.; Rossetti, S.; Seviour, R.J.; Tandoi, V. Synthesis of intracellular storage polymers by Amaricoccus kaplicensis, a tetrad forming bacterium present in activated sludge. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2001, 91, 299–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Saunders, A.M.; Oehmen, A.; Blackall, L.L. The effect of GAOs (glycogen accumulating organisms) on anaerobic carbon requirements in full-scale Australian EBPR (enhanced biologicalphosphorus removal) plants. Water Sci. Technol. 2003, 47, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Hynes, R.K.; Knowles, R. Production of nitrous oxide by Nitrosomonas europaea: Effects of acetylene, pH, and oxygen. Can. J. Microbiol. 1984, 30, 1397–1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wang, Z.P.; Liu, L.L.; Yao, H.; Cai, W.M. Effects of extracellular polymeric substances on aerobic granulation in sequencing batch reactors. Chemosphere 2006, 63, 1728–1735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Al-Halbouni, D.; Traber, J.; Lyko, S.; Wintgens, T.; Melin, T.; Tacke, D.; Hollender, J. Correlation of EPS content in activated sludge at different sludge retention times with membrane fouling phenomena. Water Res. 2008, 42, 1475–1488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. McSwain, B.S.; Irvine, R.L.; Hausner, M.; Wilderer, P.A. Composition and distribution of extracellular polymeric substances in aerobic flocs and granular sludge. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 1051–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Adav, S.S.; Lee, D.J.; Tay, J.H. Extracellular polymeric substances and structural stability of aerobic granule. Water Res. 2008, 42, 1644–1650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Zhang, H.; Jia, Y.; Khanal, S.K.; Lu, H.; Fang, H.; Zhao, Q. Understanding the role of extracellular polymeric substances on ciprofloxacin adsorption in aerobic sludge, anaerobic sludge, and sulfate-reducing bacteria sludge systems. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 6476–6486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Wang, Y.X.; Lu, Z.X. Optimization of processing parameters for the mycelial growth and extracellular polysaccharide production by Boletus spp. ACCC 50328. Process Biochem. 2005, 40, 1043–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Chen, H.; Zhou, S.; Li, T. Impact of extracellular polymeric substances on the settlement ability of aerobic granular sludge. Environ. Technol. 2010, 31, 1601–1612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Thwaites, B.J.; Reeve, P.; Dinesh, N.; Short, M.D.; van den Akker, B. Comparison of an anaerobic feed and split anaerobic–aerobic feed on granular sludge development, performance and ecology. Chemosphere 2017, 172, 408–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Jones, C.M.; Stres, B.; Rosenquist, M.; Hallin, S. Phylogenetic analysis of nitrite, nitric oxide, and nitrous oxide respiratory enzymes reveal a complex evolutionary history for denitrification. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2008, 25, 1955–1966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Pishgar, R.; Dominic, J.A.; Sheng, Z.; Tay, J.H. Denitrification performance and microbial versatility in response to different selection pressures. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 281, 72–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Srinandan, C.S.; Jadav, V.; Cecilia, D.; Nerurkar, A.S. Nutrients determine the spatial architecture of Paracoccus sp. biofilm. Biofouling 2010, 26, 449–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Foglar, L.; Briški, F. Wastewater denitrification process—The influence of methanol and kinetic analysis. Process Biochem. 2003, 39, 95–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Brooksbank, A.M.; Latchford, J.W.; Mudge, S.M. Degradation and modification of fats, oils and grease by commercial microbial supplements. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2007, 23, 977–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Al-Khatib, M.A.; Alam, M.Z.; Shabana, H. Isolation of bacterial strain for biodegradation of fats, oil and grease. Malays. J. Anal. Sci. 2015, 19, 138–143. [Google Scholar]
  57. Teixeira, P.D.; Silva, V.S.; Tenreiro, R. Integrated selection and identification of bacteria from polluted sites for biodegradation of lipids. Int. Microbiol. 2019, 1, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Wang, S.; Shi, W.; Tang, T.; Wang, Y.; Zhi, L.; Lv, J.; Li, J. Function of quorum sensing and cell signaling in the formation of aerobic granular sludge. Rev. Environ. Sci. Bio/Technol. 2017, 16, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Rotthauwe, J.H.; Witzel, K.P.; Liesack, W. The ammonia monooxygenase structural gene amoA as a functional marker: Molecular fine-scale analysis of natural ammonia-oxidizing populations. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1997, 63, 4704–4712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Lane, D.J. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics; Stackebrandt, E., Goodfellow, M., Eds.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1991; pp. 205–248. [Google Scholar]
  61. Kloos, K.; Mergel, A.; Rösch, C.; Bothe, H. Denitrification within the genus Azospirillum and other associative bacteria. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 2001, 28, 991–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Throbäck, I.N.; Enwall, K.; Jarvis, Ä.; Hallin, S. Reassessing PCR primers targeting nirS, nirK and nosZ genes for community surveys of denitrifying bacteria with DGGE. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2004, 49, 401–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Organization of reactors cycle (A) and a scheme of the reactors: 1—Oxygen detector, 2—Compressor, 3—Air pump, 4—Peristaltic pump, 5—Reactor, 6—Fine bubble diffuser (B).
Figure 1. Organization of reactors cycle (A) and a scheme of the reactors: 1—Oxygen detector, 2—Compressor, 3—Air pump, 4—Peristaltic pump, 5—Reactor, 6—Fine bubble diffuser (B).
Applsci 10 07414 g001
Figure 2. The distribution of granule particle sizes in the batch reactors.
Figure 2. The distribution of granule particle sizes in the batch reactors.
Applsci 10 07414 g002
Figure 3. Heatmap of relative abundance of bacterial taxa present in aerobic granules (abundance higher that 0.5%).
Figure 3. Heatmap of relative abundance of bacterial taxa present in aerobic granules (abundance higher that 0.5%).
Applsci 10 07414 g003
Figure 4. Changes in COD, nitrogen, and phosphorus concentrations in the effluents from the constantly aerated reactor, R1 (A), and the reactor with intermittent aeration phases, R2 (B).
Figure 4. Changes in COD, nitrogen, and phosphorus concentrations in the effluents from the constantly aerated reactor, R1 (A), and the reactor with intermittent aeration phases, R2 (B).
Applsci 10 07414 g004
Figure 5. Concentration of ammonium, nitrite and nitrate during the cycles of (A) R1 and (B) R2. Gray shading indicates phases without aeration.
Figure 5. Concentration of ammonium, nitrite and nitrate during the cycles of (A) R1 and (B) R2. Gray shading indicates phases without aeration.
Applsci 10 07414 g005
Figure 6. Content and composition of EPS in granules at the beginning and end of the reactor cycle in (A) R1 and (B) R2.
Figure 6. Content and composition of EPS in granules at the beginning and end of the reactor cycle in (A) R1 and (B) R2.
Applsci 10 07414 g006
Figure 7. The absolute number of copies of (A) bacterial 16SrRNA, (B) amoA and (C) nosZ genes in the reactors.
Figure 7. The absolute number of copies of (A) bacterial 16SrRNA, (B) amoA and (C) nosZ genes in the reactors.
Applsci 10 07414 g007
Figure 8. CCA of community of bacteria in the reactors. Environmental variables are represented by grey arrows (Cycle—Number of the reactor cycles, AEROBIC—Constant aeration in the reactor cycle, INT—intermittent aeration in the rector cycle). The taxa are named by letters and numbers: Acidobacterium sp. (S1), Tetrasphaera sp. (S2), Pseudonocardia babensis (S3), Flexibacter sp. (S4), Flavobacterium sp. (S5), Terrimonas arctica (S6), Caldilinea sp. (S7), Roseiflexus sp. (S8), Trichococcus sp. (S9), Ignavibacterium sp. (S10), Nitrospira sp. (S11), Brevundimonas sp. (S12), Hyphomicrobium sp. (S13), Mesorhizobium sp. (S14), Amaricoccus macauensis (S15), Amaricoccus tamworthensis (S16), Gemmobacter sp. (S17), Paracoccus lutimaris (S18), Paracoccus sp. (S19), Paracoccus yeei (S20), Rhodobacter sp. (S21), Tetracoccus cechii (S22), Micavibrio sp. (S23), Burkholderia sp. (S24), Hydrogenophaga sp. (S25), Ottowia sp. (S26), Rhodoferax sp. (S27), Dechloromonas sp. (S28), Thauera sp. (S29), Nannocystis sp. (S30), Tolumonas sp. (S31), Steroidobacter sp. (S32), Pseudomonas sp. (S33), Candidatus Competibacter (S34), Aquimonas sp. (S35), Dokdonella ginsengisoli (S36), Arenimonas sp. (S37), Lysobacter daejeonensis (S38).
Figure 8. CCA of community of bacteria in the reactors. Environmental variables are represented by grey arrows (Cycle—Number of the reactor cycles, AEROBIC—Constant aeration in the reactor cycle, INT—intermittent aeration in the rector cycle). The taxa are named by letters and numbers: Acidobacterium sp. (S1), Tetrasphaera sp. (S2), Pseudonocardia babensis (S3), Flexibacter sp. (S4), Flavobacterium sp. (S5), Terrimonas arctica (S6), Caldilinea sp. (S7), Roseiflexus sp. (S8), Trichococcus sp. (S9), Ignavibacterium sp. (S10), Nitrospira sp. (S11), Brevundimonas sp. (S12), Hyphomicrobium sp. (S13), Mesorhizobium sp. (S14), Amaricoccus macauensis (S15), Amaricoccus tamworthensis (S16), Gemmobacter sp. (S17), Paracoccus lutimaris (S18), Paracoccus sp. (S19), Paracoccus yeei (S20), Rhodobacter sp. (S21), Tetracoccus cechii (S22), Micavibrio sp. (S23), Burkholderia sp. (S24), Hydrogenophaga sp. (S25), Ottowia sp. (S26), Rhodoferax sp. (S27), Dechloromonas sp. (S28), Thauera sp. (S29), Nannocystis sp. (S30), Tolumonas sp. (S31), Steroidobacter sp. (S32), Pseudomonas sp. (S33), Candidatus Competibacter (S34), Aquimonas sp. (S35), Dokdonella ginsengisoli (S36), Arenimonas sp. (S37), Lysobacter daejeonensis (S38).
Applsci 10 07414 g008
Table 1. The concentrations of pollutants in wastewater from meat processing (COD—Chemical oxygen demand; BOD—Biochemical oxygen demand; TKN—Total Kjeldahl nitrogen; TP—Total phosphorus; VFA—Volatile fatty acids).
Table 1. The concentrations of pollutants in wastewater from meat processing (COD—Chemical oxygen demand; BOD—Biochemical oxygen demand; TKN—Total Kjeldahl nitrogen; TP—Total phosphorus; VFA—Volatile fatty acids).
ParameterUnitValue
CODmg L−11686.8 ± 612.0
BODmg L−11268.4 ± 421.5
TKNmg L−169.8 ± 19.5
N-NH4+mg L−120.4 ± 13.8
TPmg L−123.9 ± 4.3
P-PO43−mg L−110.3 ± 14.1
Fatsmg L−1450 ± 37
VFAmg L−1910 ± 154.2
Acetic acidmg L−1254 ± 24.6
Alkalinity-9 ± 0.3
pH-8.0 ±0.2
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jachimowicz, P.; Cydzik-Kwiatkowska, A.; Szklarz, P. Effect of Aeration Mode on Microbial Structure and Efficiency of Treatment of TSS-Rich Wastewater from Meat Processing. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 7414. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10217414

AMA Style

Jachimowicz P, Cydzik-Kwiatkowska A, Szklarz P. Effect of Aeration Mode on Microbial Structure and Efficiency of Treatment of TSS-Rich Wastewater from Meat Processing. Applied Sciences. 2020; 10(21):7414. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10217414

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jachimowicz, Piotr, Agnieszka Cydzik-Kwiatkowska, and Patrycja Szklarz. 2020. "Effect of Aeration Mode on Microbial Structure and Efficiency of Treatment of TSS-Rich Wastewater from Meat Processing" Applied Sciences 10, no. 21: 7414. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10217414

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop