Next Article in Journal
Challenges for Management in Implementing Reforms at the Ministry Level and in Health and Social Service Organizations in Finland
Previous Article in Journal
Why and How Women in Business Can Make Innovations in Light of the Sustainable Development Goals
Article

Extending the View on Project Performance

Section of Infrastructure Design & Management, Faculty of Civil Engineering & Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, Stevinweg 1, 2628 CN Delft, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Adm. Sci. 2019, 9(3), 65; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci9030065
Received: 19 July 2019 / Revised: 15 August 2019 / Accepted: 21 August 2019 / Published: 25 August 2019
The main aim of this study is to gain insights into project management professionals’ perception of how project success can be achieved. The Q-methodology was followed in this research. Based on an extensive literature review and validation through expert judgment, a framework consisting of 33 factors increasing the likelihood of success was developed. A total of 34 practitioners in three different sectors (real estate, urban development, and infrastructure) in the Netherlands were asked to rank the statements contributing to the success of their projects. Four different perspectives of how project success can be achieved were distinguished in this study: “seeking the best match”, “being adaptive and open”, “keeping the team focused”, and “preparing for opportunities”. The perception of different practitioners of how success can be obtained may stem from factors of project context rather than sector and complexity. This highlights further research opportunities in taking a contingent approach when investigating project performance. The study helps to grasp the subjectivity of practitioners’ viewpoints regarding the potential ways to enhance project performance by understanding the similarity and differences of these viewpoints. View Full-Text
Keywords: project management; project success factors; project performance criteria; project context; Q sorting project management; project success factors; project performance criteria; project context; Q sorting
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Molaei, M.; Bosch-Rekveldt, M.; Bakker, H. Extending the View on Project Performance. Adm. Sci. 2019, 9, 65. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci9030065

AMA Style

Molaei M, Bosch-Rekveldt M, Bakker H. Extending the View on Project Performance. Administrative Sciences. 2019; 9(3):65. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci9030065

Chicago/Turabian Style

Molaei, Maedeh, Marian Bosch-Rekveldt, and Hans Bakker. 2019. "Extending the View on Project Performance" Administrative Sciences 9, no. 3: 65. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci9030065

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop