Next Article in Journal
Strengthening the Energy Policy Making Process and Sustainability Outcomes in the OECD through Policy Design
Next Article in Special Issue
Understanding Collaboration in Integrated Forms of Project Delivery by Taking a Risk-Uncertainty Based Perspective
Previous Article in Journal
Customer Relationship Management and Recent Developments
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Adm. Sci. 2016, 6(3), 8;

Successful Control of Major Project Budgets

Lichtenberg & Partners, Baneskellet 16, Vedbæk DK-2950, Denmark
Academic Editor: Ole Jonny Klakegg
Received: 15 March 2016 / Revised: 29 June 2016 / Accepted: 29 June 2016 / Published: 8 July 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Project Risk Management: Challenge Established Practice)
Full-Text   |   PDF [1745 KB, uploaded 8 July 2016]   |  


This paper differs from scientific papers describing current research. In line with the theme of this special issue, it challenges conventional risk management practice against the background of former research results successfully finished decades ago. It is well-known that conventional practice frequently results in budget overruns of large projects. International reviews document that. Severe delays of schedules are also well-known. This paper describes successful research results from almost three decades ago, which successfully challenges this severe problem and has led to new practices. The research involved is an unusual mix: Scandinavian researchers from psychology, statistical theory and engineering economy. The resulting procedure has been widely used since around 1990 and challenges conventional procedures. The procedure is documented to be able to yield statistically correct prognoses, when the “rules of the game” have been correctly followed. After a short summary of the basic situation, this paper summarizes the research, followed by some resulting experiences, focusing on two recent studies each of 40 infrastructures and other major projects. In both sets, the actual final cost largely equaled the expected project cost. This result is a marked change from international past and present experience. Finally, the need for further research and progress is discussed. View Full-Text
Keywords: budget quality assurance; cost estimation; estimation methodology; major projects; risk management; scheduling; Successive Principle budget quality assurance; cost estimation; estimation methodology; major projects; risk management; scheduling; Successive Principle

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Supplementary material


Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Lichtenberg, S. Successful Control of Major Project Budgets. Adm. Sci. 2016, 6, 8.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Adm. Sci. EISSN 2076-3387 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top