Value of Uncertainty: The Lost Opportunities in Large Projects
1
Technology and Society, SINTEF, Trondheim 7031 Norway
2
Faculty of Engineering Science and Technology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Høgskoleringen 1, Trondheim 7491, Norway
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Falih M. Alsaaty
Adm. Sci. 2016, 6(3), 11; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci6030011
Received: 10 June 2016
/
Revised: 8 August 2016
/
Accepted: 9 August 2016
/
Published: 26 August 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Project Risk Management: Challenge Established Practice)
The uncertainty management theory has become well established over the last 20–30 years. However, the authors suggest that it does not fully address why opportunities often remain unexploited. Empirical studies show a stronger focus on mitigating risks than exploiting opportunities. This paper therefore addresses why so few opportunities are explored in large projects. The theory claims that risks and opportunities should be equally managed in the same process. In two surveys, conducted in six (private and public) companies over a four-year period, project managers stated that uncertainty management is about managing risk and opportunities. However, two case studies from 12 projects from the same companies revealed that all of them had their main focus on risks, and most of the opportunities were left unexploited. We have developed a theoretical explanation model to shed light on this phenomena. The concept is a reflection based on findings from our empirical data up against current project management, uncertainty, risk and stakeholder literature. Our model shows that the threshold for pursuing a potential opportunity is high. If a potential opportunity should be considered, it must be extremely interesting, since it may require contract changes, and the project must abandon an earlier-accepted best solution.
View Full-Text
Keywords:
opportunity; project management; risk; uncertainty
▼
Show Figures
Graphical abstract
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
MDPI and ACS Style
Johansen, A.; Eik-Andresen, P.; Dypvik Landmark, A.; Ekambaram, A.; Rolstadås, A. Value of Uncertainty: The Lost Opportunities in Large Projects. Adm. Sci. 2016, 6, 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci6030011
AMA Style
Johansen A, Eik-Andresen P, Dypvik Landmark A, Ekambaram A, Rolstadås A. Value of Uncertainty: The Lost Opportunities in Large Projects. Administrative Sciences. 2016; 6(3):11. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci6030011
Chicago/Turabian StyleJohansen, Agnar, Petter Eik-Andresen, Andreas Dypvik Landmark, Anandasivakumar Ekambaram, and Asbjørn Rolstadås. 2016. "Value of Uncertainty: The Lost Opportunities in Large Projects" Administrative Sciences 6, no. 3: 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci6030011
Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
