Next Article in Journal
What Determines the Entrepreneurial Intentions of Highly-Skilled Women with Refugee Experience? An Empirical Analysis in the Context of Sweden
Next Article in Special Issue
Simplification of Administrative Procedure on the Example of the Czech Republic, Poland, Slovakia, and Hungary (V4 Countries)
Previous Article in Journal
Generation Z and Key-Factors on E-Commerce: A Study on the Portuguese Tourism Sector
Article

Debureaucratization Limits in Administrative Procedures Codification: Lessons from Slovenia

Faculty of Public Administration, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Adm. Sci. 2021, 11(1), 1; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11010001
Received: 20 November 2020 / Revised: 14 December 2020 / Accepted: 15 December 2020 / Published: 22 December 2020
This article explores bureaucratization and its boundaries in the framework of cutting red tape in the regulation of administrative procedures. Law is not an end in itself but should contribute to predictable and thus better relations in society. In this sense, the priority protection of public interest—which is characteristic of administrative relations between individual holders of rights and obligations and administrative bodies—presents certain limitations to simplification. Through qualitative research methods (dogmatic, normative, and comparative methods, as well as case studies), this article examines examples of debureaucratization in Slovenia provided by the amendments to the General Administrative Procedure Act. In most cases, e.g., in waiving the right to appeal or broad fiction of service, modifications were not appropriate since constitutional guarantees cannot be subject to “debureaucratization”. However, crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic call for even greater simplification. The approach to address bureaucratization as an obstacle to the economy should therefore be holistic and proportionate. Debureaucratization should be implemented in individual administrative areas rather than by an umbrella law that ensures fundamental administrative principles, and through process optimization rather than deregulation. The results of the analysis are useful for comparable, particularly Central European countries. View Full-Text
Keywords: administrative procedures; codification; debureaucratization; public interest; Slovenia administrative procedures; codification; debureaucratization; public interest; Slovenia
MDPI and ACS Style

Kovač, P. Debureaucratization Limits in Administrative Procedures Codification: Lessons from Slovenia. Adm. Sci. 2021, 11, 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11010001

AMA Style

Kovač P. Debureaucratization Limits in Administrative Procedures Codification: Lessons from Slovenia. Administrative Sciences. 2021; 11(1):1. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11010001

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kovač, Polonca. 2021. "Debureaucratization Limits in Administrative Procedures Codification: Lessons from Slovenia" Administrative Sciences 11, no. 1: 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11010001

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop