You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Behavioral Sciences
  • Review
  • Open Access

22 February 2018

Creative Arts Interventions for Stress Management and Prevention—A Systematic Review

,
,
,
,
,
and
1
Research Institute for Creative Arts Therapies (RIArT), Alanus University of Arts and Social Sciences, Alfter/Bonn, Villestr. 3, 53347 Alfter, Germany
2
Department for Therapy Sciences, SRH University Heidelberg, Maria-Probst-Str. 3, 69123 Heidelberg, Germany
3
Robert-Bosch-Klinik, Auerbachstr. 110, 70376 Stuttgart, Germany
4
Schoen-Klinik, Hofgarten 10, 34454 Bad Arolsen, Germany
This article belongs to the Special Issue Embodied Aesthetics and Interpersonal Resonance

Abstract

Stress is one of the world’s largest health problems, leading to exhaustion, burnout, anxiety, a weak immune system, or even organ damage. In Germany, stress-induced work absenteeism costs about 20 billion Euros per year. Therefore, it is not surprising that the Central Federal Association of the public Health Insurance Funds in Germany ascribes particular importance to stress prevention and stress management as well as health enhancing measures. Building on current integrative and embodied stress theories, Creative Arts Therapies (CATs) or arts interventions are an innovative way to prevent stress and improve stress management. CATs encompass art, music, dance/movement, and drama therapy as their four major modalities. In order to obtain an overview of CATs and arts interventions’ efficacy in the context of stress reduction and management, we conducted a systematic review with a search in the following data bases: Academic Search Complete, ERIC, Medline, Psyndex, PsycINFO and SocINDEX. Studies were included employing the PICOS principle and rated according to their evidence level. We included 37 studies, 73% of which were randomized controlled trials. 81.1% of the included studies reported a significant reduction of stress in the participants due to interventions of one of the four arts modalities.

1. Introduction

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), stress is currently the world’s most pronounced health risk []. Consequences of stress are constant agitation, exhaustion, burnout, helplessness, fear, and eventually a weak immune system or even organ damage []. The inability to cope with stress is a risk factor for various epidemiologically significant illnesses: cardiovascular, muscular or skeletal diseases, depression or anxiety disorders []. Russ et al. [] showed that stress and other psychological health problems have an effect on the mortality risk of otherwise healthy individuals. In Germany, for the last 15 years, health insurance companies have registered a drastic increase in stress-induced absenteeism at work []. Interviewing 1200 German participants from various religious, age, and milieu backgrounds, the health insurance fund Techniker Krankenkasse (TK) [] found that 6 out of 10 people report to experience stress privately or at work, with 23% out of those feeling extremely stressed. Stress-induced absenteeism costs German companies about 20 billion Euros annually []. Furthermore, not only adults are affected: a comparative study of the WHO found children and adolescents to be frequently tired and exhausted, to have problems falling asleep, and to present as increasingly irritated due to stressful school and life conditions [].

1.1. Stress as a Preparation to Act

Stress is the most widespread disease of the modern age. Scientists have analyzed stress from a biological [], psychological [,] and sociological [] point of view and have created a number of explanatory theories and models. The most well-known is the transactional model of stress and coping of Richard Lazarus and his research group (e.g., [,]). Lazarus and his colleagues conceptualized stress as a consequence of the individual’s appraisal of his or her environment. It emerges, when the individual evaluates a situation or an incident as challenging or threatening (primary appraisal) and his or her own coping abilities as insufficient in the light of the situation’s requirements (secondary appraisal) []. Stress management, therefore, is an act of cognitive appraisal, which results in a certain coping behavior [].
Most recent stress theories integrate biomedical, psychosomatic, cognitive-behavioral, and sociological approaches []. Building on appraisal theories [,], the recent embodiment theory by Peter Payne and Mardi Crane-Godreau [], assumes that stress emerges when the organism’s preparation to act and cope—the so called Preparatory Set—does not resolve the aversive situation. This could occur, for example, because the behavior is disorganized or inappropriate, or simply because the situation exceeds the coping abilities of the organism (compare the Preparatory Set Theory bv Peter Payne: []). A Preparatory Set describes the rapid, largely sub-cortical, organismic preparation to respond to the environment. This preparation involves an organization of physical posture and muscle tone, visceral state, affective or motivational state, arousal and orientation of attention, and (subcortical) cognitive expectations []. If the aversive situation is not resolved, the complex activation of the organism is maintained and the organism stays in constant excitation and eventually is burned-out []. Because a Preparatory Set involves the entire organism, leverage points to tackle stress and foster resources can be manifold and are not restricted to cognitive-behavioral aspects.

1.2. Creative Arts Therapies and Arts Interventions for Stress Management and Prevention

Due to the increasing mobility, flexibility, and performance demands in today’s society, it is assumed that individuals’ stress exposures will increase further in the future []. Therefore, innovative and embodied interventions for stress prevention and health promotion are needed more than ever.
This is where Creative Arts Therapies (CATs) and arts interventions come in as they take into account what Lazarus and colleagues have missed. By conceptualizing body, mind, action, and perception as a unity, CATs, such as Music, Dance/Movement, Art, and Drama Therapy, as well as simple arts interventions, use artistic media to approach the client on a creative and nonverbal level []. In addition to cognitive ways of coping, CATs target (en-)active creation, interoception (body experience), and expression in order to access emotions and change behavior (embodied appraisal) []. Utilizing a solutogenic approach of health and disease [], CATs provide action opportunities geared toward health maintenance and focus on health promoting aspects. The recently developed model of embodied aesthetics by Koch [,,] underlines the embodied enactive nature of CATS. Different from conventional therapies, all CATs encourage and enable their clients to actively create or generate. Attention and concentration, for example, are influenced by the perception, exploration, and creation of artistic content as well as by the explicit use of the body (body perception and expression). The respective art media (art, music, dance, theater) thereby provide different methods to activate resources and coping abilities and increase action flexibility, self-efficacy, and empowerment [,,]. See Box 1 for a short overview on the four main CATs and a few exemplary fields of application.
Box 1. Overview of the four main modalities of CATs.
Creative Arts Therapies (CATs) are generally defined as “the creative use of the artistic media (art, music, drama and dance/movement) as vehicles for non-verbal and/or symbolic communication, within a holding environment, encouraged by a well-defined client-therapist relationship, in order to achieve personal and/or social therapeutic goals appropriate for the individual” ([], p. 46). CATs can and should be differentiated from arts interventions or artistic activities applied within the context of psychotherapy, counseling, rehabilitation, or medicine [,,]. While arts interventions use the arts to offer primarily artistic experiences with a therapeutic potential, CATs intentionally use the arts to offer therapeutic change. Creative Arts Therapists are registered with an arts therapies professional association and practice within a specific and regulated code of ethics []. CATs and arts interventions encourage clients to express themselves creatively, which is why they are also called expressive therapies or expressive interventions [,]. For a further clarification of the terms see Karkou and Sanderson’s discussion and illustration of differences and overalppings of CATs and arts interventions ([], p. 45).
Music Therapy (MT) is the targeted application of music (music perception, production, and reproduction) within a therapeutic relationship in order to regain, maintain, and promote physical and psychological health []. With the help of different instruments or one’s own voice, emotions and fantasies are expressed and experiences of contact created [,]. Music, in this context, furthers the ability to experience oneself and others, symbolize and relate. Clinically MT is, for example, used with psychiatric patients, neurological patients, or with children with autism []. In Art Therapy (AT), clients work with different materials (e.g., water colors, crayons, clay). Through the process of creation as well as through relating to one’s own art work, possibilities of expression are created. Previous experiences can be symbolized and expressed in a safe way. Through the fostering of symbolization and (nonverbal) communication, new perspectives and insights can be gained [,]. Specifically, the revival and/or fostering of creative resources increase self-efficacy and coping abilities in stressful situations []. Clinically, AT is used with patients who have had traumatic experiences or oncological patients among others []. Dance/Movement Therapy (DMT) is defined as the therapeutic use of movement to further the emotional, cognitive, physical, spiritual and social integration of the individual []. Physically, DMT stimulates the vestibular and cardiovascular system []. Psychologically, embodied impression and expression improve interoception, body schema, and body image []. Exploring one’s own movement abilities and limitations helps to increase emotion regulation, impulse control, and relation to reality (for example for people with schizophrenia, see []). Experiencing the own body in aesthetic movement and flow can increase self-efficacy. This is of particular importance for patients with Parkinson’s disease [].
Drama Therapy (DT) also uses the body as a medium. Voice, language, facial expressions and gestures create an “as if”-reality that enables the expression and reflection of old and recent emotions, test-acting, distancing, balancing of different roles, and the expansion of action opportunities [,]. Traditionally AT, MT, DT, and DMT are mostly employed in psychiatric and psychosomatic settings. In some countries, such as the UK and Israel, CATs are also widely employed in the school system.

1.3. Researching CATs and Arts Interventions in the Context of Stress Prevention and Stress Management

From an empirical point of view, research on CATs and health-restoring arts interventions is metaphorically speaking in its infancy or adolescence. Drawing from experiential knowledge of individual practitioners a grand literature base of case studies and clinical recommendations has developed, with an only recently growing number of evidence-based studies that provide generalizable, and transferable data [,]. CATs are used world-wide in a variety of contexts with many different populations. In addition to creative arts therapists, there are artists offering creative interventions to the patients in health institutions. They most often work without a therapeutic professional background, but also use the potential of the arts in order to foster health. In addition, psychologists, physicians, and other health care professions are increasingly discovering the contribution of the arts in their settings and conduct studies to investigate the workings of the “arts in health”. To do justice to the heterogeneity of creative arts intervention studies in health care, this review includes studies on all CATs as well as arts (art, music, dance and drama) interventions. Mere arts interventions include interventions conducted by, for example, an artist (no licensed creative arts therapist) as well as single session interventions that not necessarily have a therapeutic intention. Both, CATs and arts intervention studies are referred to collectively as creative arts interventions. To understand creative arts interventions, and to strengthen their development for instance by identifying indications and contraindications, it is indicated to inspect them in various applied contexts. The systematic review at hand provides an overview of evidence-based studies on stress management and stress prevention through creative arts interventions. Its goal is to promote a dialogue with various health practitioners and institutions on the potential and limitations of creative arts interventions in the context of stress prevention. To the knowledge of the authors this review is the first on the topic.

2. Methods

In a systematic data base search, we collected empirical studies from 1980–2016, which investigated CATs or arts interventions in the context of stress prevention. The cutoff date for the search was the third of August 2016. In addition, we contacted experts in the field and asked them to hand in studies until the end of 2016. The following data bases were searched: Academic Search Complete, ERIC, Medline, Psyndex, PsycINFO, and SocINDEX. Search terms were: art therapy OR art psychotherapy OR creative arts therapies OR drama therapy OR dance therapy OR music therapy AND stress; art AND music AND movement therapy; arts AND health OR mental health treatment OR prevention; arts AND professional education OR training. See Figure 1 for an overview of the search and study selection process. Only studies published in peer-reviewed journals were included.
Figure 1. Flow-Chart of the data base search on creative arts interventions for stress prevention.

Process of the Systematic Study Search

The systematic data base search yielded 243 studies. Studies were scanned following the PICOS principle (patient, intervention, control, outcome, study design) []. In a first step, the criterion “patient” was analyzed. To stay in the context of prevention and avoid an overlap with creative arts interventions for acute disorders, for example, in the area of mental health, only studies targeting healthy individuals or people at risk were included. Studies were excluded, if they did not analyze arts interventions in a preventive context. We included both adults and minors, because both groups have been found to be affected by stress. After the first round of exclusions on the base of these criteria, 86 studies remained. In a second step, the studies were scanned according to the criterion “intervention”. Aside from studies that specifically applied CATs, we also included studies, which provided arts interventions (art, dance, music or drama with a group of participants, see reasoning for this decision above).
In Table 1 CATs are demarcated from mere arts interventions by color coding: clinical studies of CATs are colored green, single session studies of CATs and studies on arts interventions are colored black. Single-session interventions conducted by CATs or other professions were rated as mere arts interventions, because those studies do not fulfill the criterion of containing a therapeutic process with a therapeutic relationship. Interventions neither had to be standardized, nor had to have the same duration. This heterogeneity reflects the variability of creative arts interventions in practice. Fifty-three studies remained. We included studies of evidence levels Ia—III. Evidence levels were defined according to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) [], rated by the first author and confirmed by the fourth author. Case studies were excluded. Concerning the criteria “control”, “outcome”, and “study-design”, studies should at least operate with a quasi-experimental design, preferably have a control group, and should clearly state their outcome variables. Qualitative, quantitative, as well as mixed method studies were included, as long as their method was clearly stated (in the qualitative realm, e.g., content analysis after Mayring []). After checking the remaining studies for those criteria, 32 studies remained. Five studies were handed in by experts after the cut-off date and thoroughly checked for the criteria named above. In total, we analyzed and compared 37 studies.
Table 1. Overview of Efficacy Studies on Stress Prevention and Stress Management with Creative Arts Interventions.

3. Results

Table 1 summarizes content, sample, and intervention characteristics, design, research methods, and results of the studies identified [,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,]. In total, 37 studies met our inclusion criteria, 11 studies (29.7%) investigated the effect of AT or art interventions on stress, 20 studies (54.1%) focused on MT or musical interventions, and 6 studies (16.2%) assessed the effects of DMT or dance interventions. There were no studies on DT or drama interventions that met the inclusion criteria. In total, 2136 subjects were included: 465 took part in AT or art interventions for stress management, 1241 in MT or musical interventions, and 430 in DMT or dance interventions. Most participants were women (see Table 1). Some studies did not display demographic data of their samples, and were omitted in the respective calculations. The mean age of participants was M = 32.18 years (AT: M = 27.54 years, MT: M = 35.42 years, DMT: M = 33.59 years). Duration times of interventions varied from single sessions on one day to weekly sessions for 10 weeks. Due to the great heterogeneity of interventions and the lack of reported effect sizes in many of the single studies, we did not calculate an overall effect size for the arts modalities. Due to space limitations only the most central qualitative and quantitative results of the included studies are displayed.
Table 2 gives an analytical overview of the numbers of respective studies by arts modality. As presumed earlier, most of the studies were conducted and published after 2000. Only five studies (13.5%) were published between 1980 and 1999, four of them on musical interventions, one on MT. No meta-analysis (evidence level Ia) was found on CATs or arts interventions for stress management and stress prevention. In total, we found 27 randomized controlled trials (RCTs, evidence level Ib), accounting for 73% of the included studies. Ten of the RCTs analyzed CATs, the remaining seventeen examined the effects of arts interventions. Five studies (13.5%) were rated evidence level IIa (two on CATs, three on arts interventions), two studies (5.4%) were rated evidence level IIb (all on arts interventions), and three studies (8.1%) evidence level III (all on arts interventions). Most of the studies (16; 59.3%) on the highest evidence level came from the area of Music: 9 studies analyzed MT, seven examined music interventions. With eight studies, AT provided 29.6% of the studies on evidence level Ib (none on AT, all on art interventions), and DMT contributed 11.1% (3 studies; one on DMT, two on dance interventions). Within the arts modalities 72.7% (AT and art interventions), 80% (MT and music interventions) and 50% (DMT and dance interventions) of the included studies were RCTs. Most therapy intervention studies (with several intervention sessions) were found in MT (11 out of 20) and one in DMT (1 out of 6). In AT, only studies on effects of artistic activities or single-session interventions were found.
Table 2. Overview of the reviewed studies. Evidence levels are defined according to AHRQ [].
Active art interventions, such as drawing or working with clay significantly reduced stress and anxiety in eight out of eleven studies [,,,,,,,]. None of the studies analyzed the effects of continuous interventions specifically defined as AT, Three studies [,,] reported significant positive mood changes. Two studies [,] did not find a significant stress reduction or mood changes. Two studies [,] stated that stress reduction depended on the content of the art work: positive content induced stress reduction, negative content did not. Stress was assessed with various different instruments, such as the Stress Adjective Checklist, the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, The Global Measure of Perceived Stress, or the Perceived Stress Questionnaire. Two of the studies [,] used physical measures (cortisol level []; pulse and blood pressure []) to operationalize stress. MT or musical interventions reduced stress and anxiety in 16 of 20 studies (10 on MT, 6 on music interventions) [,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,]. Four studies (one of MT, three on music interventions) [,,,] reported reductions in cortisol level, as a physical measurement of stress, and two studies (both on MT) [,] found a decrease of sleeping problems through musical interventions. Four studies (one on MT, three on music interventions) [,,] did not find a significant reduction of their stress outcomes.
All studies analyzing DMT or dance interventions found a significant reduction of stress signs or stress coping abilities in their subjects. Only one of the studies analyzed the effects of DT. In all but two studies [,] stress was measured by different self-evaluation tests. In the two other studies, stress was tested with saliva samples for cortisol levels. Four studies [,,,] furthermore reported a decrease in anxiety levels and negative affect.
In total, stress was significantly reduced in 30 out of 37 included studies (81.1%). Eleven out of twelve (91.7%) included studies on CATs found a significant stress reduction. Nineteen out of 25 (76%) included studies on mere arts interventions found a significant reduction in their stress measurement.

4. Discussion

Recently, besides being an important part in clinical health care practice, creative arts interventions have become an important area of integrative medicine research. Despite the novelty of CATs, a notable evidence-base on the efficacy of creative arts interventions in various contexts and with many different populations is emerging.
In the context of stress prevention, the quality of efficacy studies analyzing creative arts interventions is high. Three quarters of the included studies could be allocated to evidence level I and over 80% found a significant improvement in one of their stress-related outcomes. Looking at CATs, conducted by licensed therapists, the percentage rises to more than 90%. Similar to other health care contexts, MT and music interventions contribute the highest quality studies. This can be attributed to the comparably early establishment of MT, its specific focus on group therapy as well as its comparably low psychoanalytic and high empirical orientation (see []). CATs and creative arts interventions seem to have a positive impact on perceived stress and stress management. They reduce anxiety levels and improve subjects’ mood. This may be due to certain therapeutic mechanisms that researchers assume to be relevant for all creative arts therapies. Hedonism/play, aesthetic experience/authenticity, nonverbal communication/symbolizing, test-acting in an enactive transitional space, and creation/generativity are named as therapeutic mechanisms, which are active across all CATs ([,]; compare []). It remains mostly unclear how these therapeutic mechanisms interact or whether they are active in all clients and contexts. Their empirical validation is a task for future research.
Creative arts interventions’ impact on perceived stress and stress management could not be evaluated by means of an overall effect size for each arts modality. Very few of the studies clearly reported all necessary statistics needed for the calculation of effect sizes. Some did not even report the full demographic data. Furthermore, varying interventions in content and duration impede a final statement on creative arts interventions’ efficacy in the context of stress prevention. This high heterogeneity might be the biggest problem of the young academic field. Being a benefit of the creative approach in practice, the variety of procedures, methods, and interventions makes it hard to assess and judge creative arts interventions’ efficacy with conventional evidence-based research. The high heterogeneity of interventions and measures makes the application of meta-analyses difficult. This is true not only across creative arts interventions but also within each single arts modality (art, music, dance, drama). It might thus be worth looking at specific and common features of the individual CATs, delineating them from mere arts interventions and starting to relate them to features of populations and contexts. This may be a good way to find out, what is specific about each arts modality, and which contexts they work best in (indications and contraindications; see for example [,,,]). Demarcating core characteristics and mechanisms of CATs or arts interventions individually also helps to choose an adequate control group for intervention studies. Finally, finding commonalities across creative arts interventions could help clarify the benefit they bring to the health system and its agents. Patients already acknowledge these benefits, and the evidence-base on creative arts interventions is in the process of being built.

Acknowledgments

The review was conducted at the Research Institute for Creative Arts Therapies (RIArT) at Alanus University for Arts and Social Sciences in Alfter/Bonn, Germany. We would like to thank the Software AG Foundation (SAGST) for funding.

Author Contributions

S.K. and K.M. initiated the study; R.O. did the systematic data base search; L.M. supervised the systematic data base search; L.M. & R.O. defined inclusion and exclusion criteria for the studies.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Korczak, D.; Kister, C.; Huber, B. Differentialdiagnostik des Burnout-Syndroms; Schriftenreihe Health Technology Assessment (HTA) in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland: Köln, Germany, 2010; Available online: https://portal.dimdi.de/de/hta/hta_berichte/hta278_bericht_de.pdf (accessed on 1 December 2016).
  2. Franke, A.; Franzkowiak, P. Stress und Stressbewältigung. In Leitbegriffe der Gesundheitsförderung: Glossar; Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung, Ed.; Verlag für Gesundheitsförderung: Köln, Germany, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  3. GKV-Spitzenverband (Ed.) Leitfaden Prävention 2014; Handlungsfelder und Kriterien des GKV-Spitzenverbandes zur Umsetzung der §§ 20 und 20a SGB V vom 21. Juni 2000 in der Fassung vom 10, Dezember 2014; GKV-Spitzenverband: Berlin, Germany, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  4. Russ, T.C.; Stamatakis, E.; Hamer, M.; Starr, J.M.; Kivimaki, M.; Batty, G.D. Association between psychological distress and mortality: Individual participant pooled analysis of 10 prospective cohort studies. BMJ 2012, 345, e4933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Techniker-Krankenkasse. Entspann Dich, Deutschland—TK-Stressstudie 2016. Available online: https://www.tk.de/ centaurus /servlet /contentblob/921466/Datei/177594/TK-Stressstudie%202016%20Pdf%20 barrierefrei.pdf (accessed on 1 December 2016).
  6. Currie, C.; Roberts, C.; Morgan, A.; Smith, R.; Settertobulte, W.; Samdal, O.; Rasmussen, V.B. Young People’s Health in Context. Health Behaviour in Schoolaged Children (HBSC) Study: International Report from the 2001/2002 Survey; Word Health Organization: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  7. Selye, H. The Stress of Life; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1956. [Google Scholar]
  8. Folkman, S.; Lazarus, R.S.; Gruen, R.J.; DeLongis, A. Appraisal, coping, health status, and psychological symptoms. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1986, 50, 571–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Folkman, S. Stress: Appraisal and coping. In Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2013; pp. 1913–1915. [Google Scholar]
  10. Thoits, P.A. Stress and health: Major findings and policy implications. J. Health Soc. Behav. 2010, 51, 41–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Folkman, S.; Moskowitz, J.T. Coping: Pitfalls and promise. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2004, 55, 745–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Lazarus, R.S.; Folkman, S. Stress, Appraisal and Coping; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1984. [Google Scholar]
  13. Bodenmann, G.; Gmelch, S. Stressbewältigung. In Lehrbuch der Verhaltenstherapie; Margraf, J., Schneider, S., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  14. Payne, P.; Crane-Godreau, M.A. The preparatory set: A novel approach to understanding stress, trauma, and the bodymind therapies. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2015, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Koch, S.C.; Fuchs, T. Embodied Arts Therapies. Arts Psychother. 2011, 38, 276–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Prinz, J. Emotion, Psychosemantics, and Embodied Appraisals. R. Inst. Philos. Suppl. 2003, 52, 69–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Antonovsky, A. Salutogenese. Zur Entmystifizierung der Gesundheit. Forum für Verhaltenstherapie und Psychosoziale Praxis; Franke, A., Ed.; Dgvt: Tübingen, Germany, 1997; Volume 36. [Google Scholar]
  18. Koch, S.; Martin, L. Verkörperte Ästhetik: Ein identitätsstiftender Wirkfaktor der Künstlerischen Therapien. In Spezifisches und Unspezifisches in den Künstlerischen Therapien; Tüpker, R., Gruber, H., Eds.; HPB University Press: Berlin, Germany, 2017; Volume 6, pp. 81–106. [Google Scholar]
  19. Koch, S.C. Arts and Health. Active factors and a theory framework of embodied aesthetics. Arts Psychother. 2017, 54, 88–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Oepen, R.; Gruber, H. Ein kunsttherapeutischer Projekttag zur Gesundheitsförderung bei Klienten aus Burnout-Selbsthilfegruppen—Eine explorative Studie. Psychother. Psychosom. Med. Psychol. 2014, 64, 268–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Bräuninger, I. Dance movement therapy group intervention in stress treatment: A randomized controlled trial (RCT). Arts Psychother. 2012, 39, 443–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Karkou, V.; Sanderson, P. Arts Therapies: A Research-Based Map of the Field; Elsevier Health Sciences: Oxford, UK, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  23. ECArTE—European Consortium for Arts Therapies Edcuation. Available online: http://www.ecarte.info/ (accessed on 4 December 2017).
  24. Malchiodi, C.A. Expressive Therapies; The Guildford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  25. Mc Niff, S. Art-Based Research. In Handbook of the Arts in Qualitative Research: Perspectives, Methodologies, Examples and Issues; Knowles, J.G., Cole, A.L., Eds.; Sage Publications Inc.: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2008; pp. 29–40. [Google Scholar]
  26. Deutsche Musiktherapeutische Gesellschaft. Kasseler Thesen zur Musiktherapie. 2010. Available online: http://www.musiktherapie.de/fileadmin/user_upload/medien/pdf/Kasseler_Thesen_zur_Musiktherapie.pdf (accessed on 5 December 2017).
  27. Kunzmann, B.; Aldridge, D.; Gruber, H.; Wichelhaus, B. Künstlerische Therapien: Zusammenstellungen von Studien zu Künstlerischen Therapien in der Onkologie und Geriatrie: Hintergrund-Umsetzung-Perspektiven-Aufforderung. Musik Tanz Kunsttherapie 2015, 16, 77–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bergmann, T.; Sappok, T.; Diefenbacher, A.; Dames, S.; Heinrich, M.; Ziegler, M.; Dziobek, I. Music-based Autism Diagnostics (MUSAD)—A newly developed diagnostic measure for adults with intellectual developmental disabilities suspected of autism. Res. Dev. Disabil. 2015, 43, 123–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Von Spreti, F. Kunsttherapie bei Psychischen Störungen, 1st ed.; Elsevier Urban & Fischer: München, Germany, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  30. Archer, S.; Buxton, S.; Sheffield, D. The effect of creative psychological interventions on psychological outcomes for adult cancer patients: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Psycho-Oncology 2015, 24, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. EADMT. Available online: http://www.eadmt.com/ (accessed on 1 November 2017).
  32. Hanna, J.L. Dancing for Health: Conquering and Preventing Stress; Rowman Altamira: Lanham, MD, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  33. Martin, L.; Koch, S.C.; Hirjak, D.; Fuchs, T. Overcoming Disembodiment: The Effect of Movement Therapy on Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia—A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. Front. Psychol. 2016, 7, 483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Koch, S.C.; Mergheim, K.; Raeke, J.; Riegner, E.; Machado, C.B.; Nolden, J.; Diermayr, G.; Moreau, D.; Hillecke, T. The Embodied Self in Parkinson’s Disease: Feasibility of a Single Tango Intervention for Assessing Changes in Psychological Health Outcomes and Aesthetic Experience. Front. Neurosci. 2016, 10, 287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Klees, S. A Hero’s Journey in a German psychiatric hospital: A case study on the use of role method in individual drama therapy. Drama Ther. Rev. 2016, 2, 99–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Landy, R. Role theory and the role method of drama therapy. Curr. Approaches Drama Ther. 2009, 2, 65–88. [Google Scholar]
  37. Acolin, J. The Mind–Body Connection in Dance/Movement Therapy: Theory and Empirical Support. Am. J. Dance Ther. 2016, 38, 311–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gruber, H.; Rose, J.P.; Mannheim, E.; Weis, J. Künstlerische Therapien in der Onkologie—Wissenschaftlicher Kenntnisstand und Ergebnisse einer Studie. Musikther. Umsch. 2011, 32, 206–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Al-Nawas, B.; Baulig, C.; Krummenauer, F. Von der Übersichtsarbeit zur Meta-Analyse—Möglichkeiten und Risiken. From Review to Meta Analysis—Challenges and chances. Z. Zahnärztl. Impl. 2010, 26, 400–404. [Google Scholar]
  40. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). Grading the Strength of a Body of Evidence When Assessing Health Care Interventions for the Effective Health Care Program of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: An Update. In Methods Guide for Comparative Effectiveness Reviews; AHRQ Publication: Rockville, MD, USA, 2013; Volume 13, p. 14. [Google Scholar]
  41. Mayring, P. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. In Handbuch Qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie; Mey, G., Mruck, K., Eds.; VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften: Wiesbaden, Germany, 2010; pp. 601–613. [Google Scholar]
  42. Abbott, K.; Shanahan, M.J.; Neufeld, R.W.J. Artistic tasks outperform nonartistic tasks for stress reduction. Art Ther. 2013, 30, 71–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Curl, K. Assessing Stress Reduction as a Function of Artistic Creation and Cognitive Focus. Art Ther. 2008, 25, 164–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Huss, E.; Sarid, O. Visually transforming artwork and guided imagery as a way to reduce work related stress: A quantitative pilot study. Arts Psychother. 2014, 41, 409–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kaimal, G.; Ray, K.; Muniz, J. Reduction of Cortisol Levels and Participants’ Responses Following Art Making. Art Ther. 2016, 33, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Kimport, E.R.; Robbins, S.J. Efficacy of Creative Clay Work for Reducing Negative Mood: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Art Ther. 2012, 29, 74–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mercer, A.; Warson, E.; Zhao, J. Visual journaling: An intervention to influence stress, anxiety and affect levels in medical students. Arts Psychother. 2010, 37, 143–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Pizarro, J. The Efficacy of Art and Writing Therapy: Increasing Positive Mental Health Outcomes and Participant Retention after Exposure to Traumatic Experience. Art Ther. 2004, 21, 5–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sandmire, D.A.; Gorham, S.R.; Rankin, N.E.; Grimm, D.R. The Influence of Art Making on Anxiety: A Pilot Study. Art Ther. 2012, 29, 68–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Schrade, C.; Tronsky, L.; Kaiser, D.H. Physiological effects of mandala making in adults with intellectual disability. Arts Psychother. 2011, 38, 109–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Smolarski, K.; Leone, K.; Robbins, S.J. Reducing Negative Mood through Drawing: Comparing Venting, Positive Expression, and Tracing. Art Ther. 2015, 32, 197–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Walsh, S.M.; Martin, S.C.; Schmidt, L.A. Testing the Efficacy of a Creative-Arts Intervention with Family Caregivers of Patients with Cancer. J. Nurs. Scholarsh. 2004, 36, 214–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Beck, B.D.; Hansen, A.M.; Gold, C. Coping with Work-Related Stress through Guided Imagery and Music (GIM): Randomized Controlled Trial. J. Music Ther. 2015, 52, 323–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Brodsky, W.; Sloboda, J.A. Clinical trial of a music generated vibrotactile therapeutic environment for musicians: Main effects and outcome differences between therapy subgroups. J. Music Ther. 1997, 34, 2–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Brooks, D.M.; Bradt, J.; Eyre, L.; Hunt, A.; Dileo, C. Creative approaches for reducing burnout in medical personnel. Arts Psychother. 2010, 37, 255–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Byrnes, S.R. The effect of audio, video, and paired audio-video stimuli on the experience of stress. J. Music Ther. 1996, 33, 248–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Chang, M.-Y.; Chen, C.-H.; Huang, K.-F. Effects of music therapy on psychological health of women during pregnancy. J. Clin. Nurs. 2008, 17, 2580–2587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. DuRousseau, D.R.; Mindlin, G.; Insler, J.; Levin, I.I. Operational Study to Evaluate music-based neurotraining at improving sleep quality, mood and daytime function in a first responder population. J. Neurother. 2011, 15, 389–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  59. Goff, L.C.; Pratt, R.R.; Madrigal, J.L. Music listening and A-lgA levels in patients undergoing a dental procedure. Int. J. Arts Med. 1998, 5, 22–26. [Google Scholar]
  60. Hatta, T.; Nakamura, M. Can antistress music tapes reduce mental stress? Stress Med. 1991, 7, 181–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ilie, G.; Rehana, R. Effects of Individual Music Playing and music listening on acute-stress recovery. Can. J. Music Ther. 2013, 19, 23–46. [Google Scholar]
  62. Jacobsen, S.L.; McKinney, C.H.; Holck, U. Effects of a dyadic music therapy intervention on parent-child interaction, parent stress, and parent-child relationship in families with emotionally neglected children: A randomized controlled trial. J. Music Ther. 2014, 51, 310–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Kim, S.-A. Predictors of Acculturative Stress among International Music Therapy Students in the United States. Music Ther. Perspect. 2011, 29, 126–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Lesiuk, T. The effect of preferred music listening on stress levels of air traffic controllers. Arts Psychother. 2008, 35, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Maschi, T.; Bradley, C. Recreational Drumming: A creative arts intervention strategy for social work teaching and practice. J. Baccalaureate Soc. Work 2010, 15, 53–66. [Google Scholar]
  66. Mohammadi, A.Z.; Shahabi, T.; Panah, F.M. An evaluation of the effect of group music therapy on stress, anxiety, and depression levels in nursing home residents. Can. J. Music Ther. 2011, 17, 55–68. [Google Scholar]
  67. Murphy, E.M.; Nichols, J.; Somkuti, S.G.; Sobel, M.; Braverman, A.; Barmat, L.I. Randomized Trial of Harp Therapy During In Vitro Fertilization–Embryo Transfer. J. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2013, 19, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Rider, M.S.; Floyd, J.W.; Kirkpatrick, J. The Effect of Music, Imagery, and Relaxation on Adrenal Corticosteroids and the Re-entrainment of Circadian Rhythms. J. Music Ther. 1985, 22, 46–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Sharma, M.; Jagdev, T. Use of Music therapy for enhancing self-esteem among Academically Stressed Adolescents. Pak. J. Psychol. Res. 2012, 27, 53–64. [Google Scholar]
  70. Smith, J.C.; Joyce, C.A. Mozart versus New Age Music: Relaxation States, Stress, and ABC Relaxation Theory. J. Music Ther. 2004, 41, 215–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Smith, M. The Effects of a Single Music Relaxation Session on State Anxiety Levels of Adulats in a Workplace Environment. Aust. J. Music Ther. 2008, 19, 45–66. [Google Scholar]
  72. Toyoshima, K.; Fukui, H.; Kuda, K. Piano playing reduces stress more than other creative art activities. Int. J. Music Educ. 2011, 29, 257–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Pinniger, R.; Brown, R.F.; Thorsteinsson, E.B.; McKinley, P. Argentine tango dance compared to mindfulness meditation and a waiting-list control: A randomised trial for treating depression. Complement. Ther. Med. 2012, 20, 377–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Pinninger, R.; Thorsteinsson, E.B.; Brown, R.F.; McKinley, P. Intensive Tango Dance Program for People with Self-Referred Affective Symptoms. Music Med. 2013, 5, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Quiroga Murcia, C.; Bongard, S.; Kreutz, G. Emotional and neurohumoral responses to dancing tango argentino: The effects of music and partner. Music Med. 2009, 1, 14–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. West, J.; Otte, C.; Geher, K.; Johnson, J.; Mohr, D.C. Effects of Hatha yoga and African dance on perceived stress, affect, and salivary cortisol. Ann. Behav. Med. 2004, 28, 114–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Wiedenhofer, S.; Koch, S.C. Active factors in dance/movement therapy: Specifying health effects of non-goal-orientation in movement. Arts Psychother. 2016, 52, 10–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Körlin, D.; Nybäck, H.; Goldberg, F.S. Creative arts groups in psychiatric care. Development and evaluation of a therapeutic alternative. Nord. J. Psychiatry 2009, 54, 333–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Koch, S.C.; Kolter, A.; Kurz, T. Indikationen und Kontraindikation in der Tanz- und Bewegungstherapie. Eine induktive Bestandsaufnahme. Musik Tanz Kunsttherapie 2013, 23, 87–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Stegemann, T.; Schmidt, H.-U. A pilot investigation on indication and contraindication of music therapy in child and adolescent psychiatry. Musikther. Umsch. 2010, 31, 87–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.