Next Article in Journal
Measuring Spanish Comprehension in Infants from Mixed Hispanic Communities Using the IDHC: A Preliminary Study on 16-Month-Olds
Previous Article in Journal
‘Perceptions of Performance Appraisal Quality’ and Employee Innovative Behavior: Do Psychological Empowerment and ‘Perceptions of HRM System Strength’ Matter?
Open AccessReview

A Scoping Review of Different Ways of Thinking in Children

Faculty of Education, Monash University, 19 Ancora ImparoWay, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Behav. Sci. 2018, 8(12), 115; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs8120115
Received: 18 October 2018 / Revised: 10 December 2018 / Accepted: 12 December 2018 / Published: 15 December 2018
Despite the growing interest in differences in thinking, much less is known about differences in how children think and how they come to think. The aim of this scoping review is to map out the key concepts underpinning the conceptual boundaries of children’s (5–12 years of age) individual differences in thinking. The scoping review identified eight papers for analysis; all of which were set in an educational context. The findings presented inconclusive results regarding learning and thinking differences related to students’ academic achievement. This review has identified two main drawbacks with this research area. Firstly, there is little consensus between the models employed to understand the different ways children think. To further place these findings into context we look at conceptualisations of individual differences, where individuality is considered a process of stable characteristics interacting with more dynamic structures. This analysis highlights the second drawback, previous research has solely focused on exploring thinking characteristics that are not stable and are therefore subject to change depending on the context. The review found that there is little to no research which explores thinking preferences in children that are consistent across contexts and time. Moreover, there was no research identified that explored the impact of differences in thinking outside the educational domain, such as children’s wellbeing. Further research is required to identify the more stable characteristics that reflect and capture children’s different ways of thinking. View Full-Text
Keywords: individual differences in thinking; children; scoping review individual differences in thinking; children; scoping review
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Jones Arango, E.; Costello, S.; Grové, C. A Scoping Review of Different Ways of Thinking in Children. Behav. Sci. 2018, 8, 115.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop