Next Article in Journal
The Relationship between Self-Reported Executive Functioning and Risk-Taking Behavior in Urban Homeless Youth
Previous Article in Journal
Effectiveness of a Computer-Based Training Program of Attention and Memory in Patients with Acquired Brain Damage
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessPerspective
Behav. Sci. 2018, 8(1), 5; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs8010005

The EFPA Test-Review Model: When Good Intentions Meet a Methodological Thought Disorder

Cognadev Ltd., 18B Balmoral Avenue, Hurlingham, Sandton 2196, South Africa
Received: 2 November 2017 / Revised: 19 December 2017 / Accepted: 27 December 2017 / Published: 31 December 2017
Full-Text   |   PDF [698 KB, uploaded 2 January 2018]   |   Review Reports

Abstract

The European Federation of Psychologists’ Associations (EFPA) has issued sets of test standards and guidelines for psychometric test reviews without any attempt to address the critical content of many substantive publications by measurement experts such as Joel Michell. For example, he has argued that the psychometric test-theory which underpins classical and modern IRT psychometrics is “pathological”, with the entire profession of psychometricians suffering from a methodological thought disorder. With the advent of new kinds of assessment now being created by the “Next Generation” of psychologists which no longer conform to the item-based, statistical test theory generated last century, a new framework is set out for constructing evidence-bases suitable for these “Next Generation” of assessments, which avoids the illusory beliefs of equal-interval or quantitatively structured psychological attributes. Finally, with no systematic or substantive refutations of the logic, axioms, and evidence set out by Michell and others; it is concluded psychologists and their professional associations remain in denial. As with the eventual demise of a similar attempt to maintain the status quo of professional beliefs within forensic clinical psychology and psychiatry during the last century, those following certain EFPA guidelines might now find themselves required to justify their professional beliefs in legal rather than academic environments. View Full-Text
Keywords: measurement; EFPA guidelines; assessments; psychometrics; standards measurement; EFPA guidelines; assessments; psychometrics; standards
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Supplementary material

Review Report

SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Barrett, P. The EFPA Test-Review Model: When Good Intentions Meet a Methodological Thought Disorder. Behav. Sci. 2018, 8, 5.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Behav. Sci. EISSN 2076-328X Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top