Understanding Consumer Purchase Intention in Virtual Live Streaming: The Moderating Role of Anthropomorphism
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Virtual Live Streaming
2.2. Mind Perception Theory
2.3. Factors Influencing Mind Perception
2.4. Anthropomorphism
3. Conceptual Framework and Hypotheses
3.1. Effects of Utility and Responsiveness on Perceived Agency
3.2. Effects of Friendliness and Empathy on Perceived Experience
3.3. The Moderating Role of Anthropomorphism
3.4. Effect of Perceived Agency and Perceived Experience on Purchase Intention
4. Methods
4.1. Measurement Development
4.2. Data Collection
5. Results
5.1. Results of Measurement Model
5.1.1. Common Method Bias
5.1.2. The Reliability and Validity
5.2. Results of Structural Model
5.2.1. Analysis of Main Effect
5.2.2. Analysis of Moderating Effect
6. Discussion
6.1. Implications for Research
6.2. Implications for Practice
6.3. Limitations and Opportunities for Future Studies
7. Conclusions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
| Constructs and Measurement | Sources | Loading |
|---|---|---|
| Responsiveness | ||
| 1. Virtual anchors in Taobao virtual live streaming are very happy to communicate with me. | (Xue et al., 2020) | 0.788 |
| 2. Virtual streamer in Taobao virtual live streaming can answer my questions and requests in time. | 0.641 | |
| 3. The responses of virtual anchors in Taobao virtual live streaming are closely related to my problems and requests. | 0.775 | |
| 4. Virtual anchors in Taobao virtual live streaming can provide relevant information for my inquiry in time. | 0.769 | |
| Utility | ||
| 1. Virtual anchors in Taobao virtual live are useful. | (Kumar & Benbasat, 2006) | 0.813 |
| 2. I think the purpose of virtual anchors in Taobao virtual live streaming is to help people. | 0.678 | |
| 3. Virtual anchors in Taobao virtual live streaming would help customers get things done. | 0.682 | |
| 4. Virtual anchors in Taobao virtual live streaming help efficient service. | 0.747 | |
| Friendliness | ||
| 1. Virtual anchors in Taobao virtual live streaming have kind service during our interaction. | (X. Cheng et al., 2022) | 0.825 |
| 2. Virtual anchors in Taobao virtual live streaming provide the service in a friendly manner. | 0.677 | |
| 3. Virtual anchors in Taobao virtual live streaming treat me nicely. | 0.821 | |
| Empathy | ||
| 1. Virtual anchors in Taobao virtual live streaming usually understand the specific needs of me. | (Shen et al., 2010) | 0.873 |
| 2. Virtual anchors in Taobao virtual live streaming usually give me individual attention. | 0.826 | |
| 3. Virtual anchors in Taobao virtual live streaming are available whenever it’s convenient for me. | 0.807 | |
| Anthropomorphism | ||
| 1. Virtual anchors in Taobao virtual live streaming behave human like. | (M. C. Han, 2021) | 0.820 |
| 2. Virtual anchors in Taobao virtual live streaming behave lifelike. | 0.818 | |
| 3. Virtual anchors in Taobao virtual live streaming behave natural. | 0.872 | |
| Perceived agency | ||
| 1. Virtual anchors in Taobao virtual live streaming can communicate with me. | (Yam et al., 2021) | 0.769 |
| 2. Virtual anchors in Taobao virtual live streaming can think. | 0.772 | |
| 3. Virtual anchors in Taobao virtual live streaming can remember the problems I ask about products. | 0.742 | |
| Perceived experience | ||
| 1. I think virtual anchors in Taobao virtual live streaming can feel pain. | (Yam et al., 2021) | 0.886 |
| 2. I think virtual anchors in Taobao virtual live streaming can feel fear. | 0.896 | |
| 3. I think virtual anchors in Taobao virtual live streaming can have desires. | 0.870 | |
| 4. I think virtual anchors in Taobao virtual live streaming can be happy. | 0.905 | |
| Purchase intention | ||
| 1. I am very likely to buy the products from Taobao virtual live streaming. | (Lu & Chen, 2021) | 0.895 |
| 2. I would consider buying the products from Taobao virtual live streaming. | 0.767 | |
| 3. I intend to buy the products from Taobao virtual live streaming. | 0.857 | |
Appendix B
| Construct | Indicator | Substantive Factor Loading (R1) | R12 | Method Factor Loading (R2) | R22 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RES | RES1 | 0.499 *** | 0.249 | 0.317 ** | 0.100 |
| RES2 | 0.670 *** | 0.449 | −0.071 | 0.005 | |
| RES3 | 0.887 *** | 0.787 | −0.107 | 0.012 | |
| RES4 | 0.922 *** | 0.851 | −0.150 | 0.023 | |
| UTY | UTY1 | 0.843 *** | 0.710 | −0.049 | 0.002 |
| UTY2 | 0.823 *** | 0.678 | −0.149 | 0.022 | |
| UTY3 | 0.591 *** | 0.349 | 0.139 | 0.019 | |
| UTY4 | 0.664 *** | 0.441 | 0.066 | 0.004 | |
| FRD | FRD1 | 0.797 *** | 0.635 | 0.016 | 0.000 |
| FRD2 | 0.735 *** | 0.540 | −0.023 | 0.001 | |
| FRD3 | 0.801 *** | 0.641 | 0.004 | 0.000 | |
| EPY | EPY1 | 0.863 *** | 0.744 | 0.012 | 0.000 |
| EPY2 | 0.763 *** | 0.583 | 0.050 | 0.003 | |
| EPY3 | 0.881 *** | 0.777 | −0.062 | 0.004 | |
| ATH | ATH1 | 0.839 *** | 0.705 | −0.029 | 0.001 |
| ATH2 | 0.849 *** | 0.721 | −0.025 | 0.001 | |
| ATH3 | 0.824 *** | 0.679 | 0.051 | 0.003 | |
| PAG | PAG1 | 0.917 *** | 0.840 | −0.142 | 0.020 |
| PAG2 | 0.446 *** | 0.199 | 0.348 *** | 0.121 | |
| PAG3 | 0.905 *** | 0.818 | −0.182 | 0.033 | |
| PEX | PEX1 | 1.109 *** | 1.231 | −0.252 *** | 0.063 |
| PEX2 | 0.991 *** | 0.981 | −0.103 | 0.011 | |
| PEX3 | 0.695 *** | 0.483 | 0.195 ** | 0.038 | |
| PEX4 | 0.757 *** | 0.573 | 0.167 ** | 0.028 | |
| PI | PI1 | 0.912 *** | 0.832 | −0.019 | 0.000 |
| PI2 | 0.861 *** | 0.741 | −0.088 | 0.008 | |
| PI3 | 0.752 *** | 0.565 | 0.104 | 0.011 | |
| Average | 0.800 | 0.651 | 0.001 | 0.020 |
References
- Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage. [Google Scholar]
- Aliyun. (2023). What is AI live studio of brand? Available online: https://help.aliyun.com/document_detail/272512.html?spm=a2c4g.272493.0.0.6eb853d09Qk6VR (accessed on 20 July 2025).
- Birnbaum, G. E., Mizrahi, M., Hoffman, G., Reis, H. T., Finkel, E. J., & Sass, O. (2016). What robots can teach us about intimacy: The reassuring effects of robot responsiveness to human disclosure. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 416–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blut, M., Wang, C., Wünderlich, N. V., & Brock, C. (2021). Understanding anthropomorphism in service provision: A meta-analysis of physical robots, chatbots, and other AI. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 49(4), 632–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cha, S. S. (2020). Customers’ intention to use robot-serviced restaurants in Korea: Relationship of coolness and MCI factors. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 32(9), 2947–2968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.-C., Lin, S.-Y., Cheng, C.-H., & Tsai, C.-C. (2012). Service quality and corporate social responsibility, influence on post-purchase intentions of sheltered employment institutions. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 33(6), 1832–1840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H., Dou, Y., & Xiao, Y. (2023). Understanding the role of live streamers in live-streaming e-commerce. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 59, 101266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H., Shao, B., Yang, X., Kang, W., & Fan, W. (2024). Avatars in live streaming commerce: The influence of anthropomorphism on consumers’ willingness to accept virtual live streamers. Computers in Human Behavior, 156, 108216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, J.-S., Le, T.-T.-Y., & Florence, D. (2021). Usability and responsiveness of artificial intelligence chatbot on online customer experience in e-retailing. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 49(11), 1512–1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, X., Huang, Q., & Davison, R. M. (2017). Economic and social satisfaction of buyers on consumer-to-consumer platforms: The role of relational capital. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 21(2), 219–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y., Li, L., & Zhou, W. (2025). Impact of viewer-streamer-content congruence on users’ behavioral intention in virtual streaming: The moderating effect of role-playing. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 70, 101492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, X., Bao, Y., Zarifis, A., Gong, W., & Mou, J. (2022). Exploring consumers’ response to text-based chatbots in e-commerce: The moderating role of task complexity and chatbot disclosure. Internet Research, 32(2), 496–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, Y., & Jiang, H. (2022). Customer–brand relationship in the era of artificial intelligence: Understanding the role of chatbot marketing efforts. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 31(2), 252–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chung, M., Ko, E., Joung, H., & Kim, S. J. (2020). Chatbot e-service and customer satisfaction regarding luxury brands. Journal of Business Research, 117, 587–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crolic, C., Thomaz, F., Hadi, R., & Stephen, A. T. (2022). Blame the bot: Anthropomorphism and anger in customer–chatbot interactions. Journal of Marketing, 86(1), 132–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, N., Wang, T., & Xu, S. (2010). The influence of social presence on consumers’ perceptions of the interactivity of web sites. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 11(1), 36–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Czaplewski, A. J., Olson, E. M., & Slater, S. F. (2002). Applying the RATER model for service success. Marketing Management, 11(1), 14–17. [Google Scholar]
- David-Ignatieff, A., Buzeta, C., De Pelsmacker, P., & Ben Dahmane Mouelhi, N. (2023). This embodied conversational agent looks very human and as old as I feel! The effect of perceived agent anthropomorphism and consumer-agent age difference on brand attitude. Journal of Marketing Communications, 30(8), 881–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Kervenoael, R., Hasan, R., Schwob, A., & Goh, E. (2020). Leveraging human-robot interaction in hospitality services: Incorporating the role of perceived value, empathy, and information sharing into visitors’ intentions to use social robots. Tourism Management, 78, 104042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2004). Measuring e-commerce success: Applying the Delone & Mclean information systems success model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 9(1), 31–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Di Natale, A. F., Simonetti, M. E., La Rocca, S., & Bricolo, E. (2023). Uncanny valley effect: A qualitative synthesis of empirical research to assess the suitability of using virtual faces in psychological research. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 10, 100288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fridin, M., & Belokopytov, M. (2014). Acceptance of socially assistive humanoid robot by preschool and elementary school teachers. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, W., Jiang, N., & Guo, Q. (2023). How do virtual streamers affect purchase intention in the live streaming context? A presence perspective. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 73, 103356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gong, X., & Sun, P. (2025). Can virtual streamers express emotions? Understanding the language style of virtual streamers in livestreaming e-commerce. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 82, 104148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gray, K., Knobe, J., Sheskin, M., Bloom, P., & Barrett, L. F. (2011). More than a body: Mind perception and the nature of objectification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(6), 1207–1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2012). Feeling robots and human zombies: Mind perception and the uncanny valley. Cognition, 125(1), 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guerreiro, J., & Loureiro, S. M. C. (2023). I am attracted to my cool smart assistant! Analyzing attachment-aversion in AI-human relationships. Journal of Business Research, 161, 113863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, B., Deng, X., & Fan, H. (2023). Partners or opponents? How mindset shapes consumers’ attitude toward anthropomorphic artificial intelligence service robots. Journal of Service Research, 26(3), 441–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, L., Fang, J., Xie, C., Liao, M., & Zhang, Y. (2025). Breaking CSR skepticism: How virtual streamer disclosure influences consumer purchases in livestreaming. Journal of Business Ethics, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, M. C. (2021). The Impact of anthropomorphism on consumers’ purchase decision in chatbot commerce. Journal of Internet Commerce, 20(1), 46–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hartmann, J., Bergner, A., & Hildebrand, C. (2023). MindMiner: Uncovering linguistic markers of mind perception as a new lens to understand consumer–smart object relationships. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 33(4), 645–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hou, F., Guan, Z., Li, B., & Chong, A. Y. L. (2020). Factors influencing people’s continuous watching intention and consumption intention in live streaming. Internet Research, 30(1), 141–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, B., Mao, Y., & Kim, K. J. (2023). How social anxiety leads to problematic use of conversational AI: The roles of loneliness, rumination, and mind perception. Computers in Human Behavior, 145, 107760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, R., Zhou, X., Ye, W., & Guo, S. (2020). Think versus feel: Two dimensions of brand anthropomorphism. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 29(7), 955–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, N., & Benbasat, I. (2006). Research note: The influence of recommendations and consumer reviews on evaluations of websites. Information Systems Research, 17(4), 425–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, S., Lee, N., & Sah, Y. J. (2020). Perceiving a mind in a chatbot: Effect of mind perception and social cues on co-presence, closeness, and intention to use. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36(10), 930–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, L., Chen, X., & Zhu, P. (2024). How do e-commerce anchors’ characteristics influence consumers’ impulse buying? An emotional contagion perspective. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 76, 103587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, S., Peluso, A. M., & Duan, J. (2023). Why do we prefer humans to artificial intelligence in telemarketing? A mind perception explanation. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 70, 103139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X., & Sung, Y. (2021). Anthropomorphism brings us closer: The mediating role of psychological distance in User–AI assistant interactions. Computers in Human Behavior, 118, 106680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, H., Saraf, N., Hu, Q., & Xue, Y. (2007). Assimilation of enterprise systems: The effect of institutional pressures and the mediating role of top management. MIS Quarterly, 31(1), 59–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, F., & Wang, R. (2025). Fostering parasocial relationships with virtual influencers in the uncanny valley: Anthropomorphism, autonomy, and a multigroup comparison. Journal of Business Research, 186, 115024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y., Wang, Y., Yang, S., & Wang, Y. (2025). Artificial intelligence-powered digital streamers in online retail: Empirical insights and design strategies from experiments. Information Systems Research, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, B., & Chen, Z. (2021). Live streaming commerce and consumers’ purchase intention: An uncertainty reduction perspective. Information & Management, 58(7), 103509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malik, P., Gautam, S., & Srivastava, S. (2020). A study on behaviour intention for using chatbots. In Proceedings of the 2020 8th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (Trends and Future Directions) (ICRITO), Noida, India. IEEE. [Google Scholar]
- Mende, M., Scott, M. L., van Doorn, J., Grewal, D., & Shanks, I. (2019). Service robots rising: How humanoid robots influence service experiences and elicit compensatory consumer responses. Journal of Marketing Research, 56(4), 535–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mikalef, P., Islam, N., Parida, V., Singh, H., & Altwaijry, N. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI) competencies for organizational performance: A B2B marketing capabilities perspective. Journal of Business Research, 164, 113998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Müller, B. C. N., Gao, X., Nijssen, S. R. R., & Damen, T. G. E. (2021). I, robot: How human appearance and mind attribution relate to the perceived danger of robots. International Journal of Social Robotics, 13, 691–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niculescu, A., van Dijk, B., Nijholt, A., Li, H., & See, S. L. (2013). Making social robots more attractive: The effects of voice pitch, humor and empathy. International Journal of Social Robotics, 5(2), 171–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niu, B., Yu, X., & Dong, J. (2023). Could AI livestream perform better than KOL in cross-border operations? Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 174, 103130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Novak, T. P., & Hoffman, D. L. (2019). Relationship journeys in the internet of things: A new framework for understanding interactions between consumers and smart objects. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 47(2), 216–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pelau, C., Dabija, D.-C., & Ene, I. (2021). What makes an AI device human-like? The role of interaction quality, empathy and perceived psychological anthropomorphic characteristics in the acceptance of artificial intelligence in the service industry. Computers in Human Behavior, 122, 106855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, C., van Doorn, J., Eggers, F., & Wieringa, J. E. (2022). The effect of required warmth on consumer acceptance of artificial intelligence in service: The moderating role of AI-human collaboration. International Journal of Information Management, 66, 102533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petre, M., Minocha, S., & Roberts, D. (2006). Usability beyond the website: An empirically-grounded e-commerce evaluation instrument for the total customer experience. Behaviour & Information Technology, 25(2), 189–203. [Google Scholar]
- Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Roy, R., & Naidoo, V. (2021). Enhancing chatbot effectiveness: The role of anthropomorphic conversational styles and time orientation. Journal of Business Research, 126, 23–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schutte, N. S., Malouff, J. M., Bobik, C., Coston, T. D., Greeson, C., Jedlicka, C., Rhodes, E., & Wendorf, G. (2001). Emotional intelligence and interpersonal relations. The Journal of Social Psychology, 141(4), 523–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seymour, M., Yuan, L., Riemer, K., & Dennis, A. R. (2025). Less artificial, more intelligent: Understanding affinity, trustworthiness, and preference for digital humans. Information Systems Research, 36(2), 1096–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, Y.-C., Huang, C.-Y., Chu, C.-H., & Liao, H.-C. (2010). Virtual community loyalty: An interpersonal-interaction perspective. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 15(1), 49–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, S. W., & Shin, M. (2024). Uncanny valley effects on chatbot trust, purchase intention, and adoption intention in the context of E-commerce: The moderating role of avatar familiarity. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 40(2), 441–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, X., Xu, B., & Zhao, Z. (2022). Can people experience romantic love for artificial intelligence? An empirical study of intelligent assistants. Information & Management, 59(2), 103595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Söderlund, M. (2022). Service robots with (perceived) theory of mind: An examination of humans’ reactions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 67, 102999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sullivan, Y. W., & Fosso Wamba, S. (2022). Moral judgments in the age of artificial intelligence. Journal of Business Ethics, 178(4), 917–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, L., & Tang, Y. (2024). Avatar effect of AI-enabled virtual streamers on consumer purchase intention in e-commerce livestreaming. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 23(6), 2999–3010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsai, W.-C., & Huang, Y.-M. (2002). Mechanisms linking employee affective delivery and customer behavioral intentions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 1001–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Van de Vijver, F. J. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Sage. [Google Scholar]
- Verhagen, T., van Nes, J., Feldberg, F., & van Dolen, W. (2014). Virtual customer service agents: Using social presence and personalization to shape online service encounters. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(3), 529–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, W. (2017). Smartphones as social actors? Social dispositional factors in assessing anthropomorphism. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 334–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X., & Qiu, X. (2024). The positive effect of artificial intelligence technology transparency on digital endorsers: Based on the theory of mind perception. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 78, 103777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Waytz, A., Heafner, J., & Epley, N. (2014). The mind in the machine: Anthropomorphism increases trust in an autonomous vehicle. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 52, 113–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Waytz, A., & Norton, M. I. (2014). Botsourcing and outsourcing: Robot, British, Chinese, and German workers are for thinking—Not feeling—Jobs. Emotion, 14, 434–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, R., Liu, J., Chen, S., & Tong, X. (2023). The effect of E-commerce virtual live streamer socialness on consumers’ experiential value: An empirical study based on Chinese e-commerce live streaming studios. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 17(5), 714–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, Q., Li, X., Huang, W., & Zhang, X. (2025). Gimmick or genuineness? Exploring the antecedents of AI virtual streamers aversion in live-streaming commerce. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 212, 123981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xue, J., Liang, X., Xie, T., & Wang, H. (2020). See now, act now: How to interact with customers to enhance social commerce engagement? Information & Management, 57(6), 103324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yam, K. C., Bigman, Y. E., Tang, P. M., Ilies, R., De Cremer, D., Soh, H., & Gray, K. (2021). Robots at work: People prefer—And forgive—Service robots with perceived feelings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(10), 1557–1572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, M., Liu, Y., Wang, Y., & Zhao, L. (2022). How to retain customers: Understanding the role of trust in live streaming commerce with a socio-technical perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 127, 107052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X., Shi, Y., Li, T., Guan, Y., & Cui, X. (2024). How do virtual AI streamers influence viewers’ livestream shopping behavior? The effects of persuasive factors and the mediating role of arousal. Information Systems Frontiers, 26(5), 1803–1834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y., & Wang, S. (2023). The influence of anthropomorphic appearance of artificial intelligence products on consumer behavior and brand evaluation under different product types. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 74, 103432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]




| Items | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | 52.80% |
| Female | 47.20% | |
| Education | High school or below | 1.50% |
| College | 7.10% | |
| University | 85.30% | |
| Graduate school or above | 6.10% | |
| Monthly Income (US$1 = RMB 6.96) | Under RMB3000 | 4.10% |
| RMB 3000–4999 | 10.20% | |
| RMB 5000–6999 | 13.70% | |
| RMB 7000–8999 | 28.40% | |
| RMB 9000 and above | 43.70% | |
| Age | Below 20 | 1.00% |
| 21–29 | 34.50% | |
| 30–39 | 53.30% | |
| 40–49 | 9.10% | |
| 50 and above | 2.00% | |
| Usage Experience (year) | Below 1 | 0.50% |
| 1–2 | 35.50% | |
| 3–4 | 35.00% | |
| Above 4 | 28.90% |
| Construct | Items | Cronbach’s Alpha | Composite Reliability | Average Variance Extracted |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Responsiveness (RES) | 4 | 0.730 | 0.833 | 0.556 |
| Utility (UTY) | 4 | 0.711 | 0.821 | 0.536 |
| Friendliness (FRD) | 3 | 0.672 | 0.820 | 0.604 |
| Empathy (EPY) | 3 | 0.785 | 0.874 | 0.699 |
| Anthropomorphism (ATH) | 3 | 0.786 | 0.875 | 0.700 |
| Perceived Agency (PAG) | 3 | 0.640 | 0.805 | 0.580 |
| Perceived Experience (PEX) | 4 | 0.912 | 0.938 | 0.791 |
| Purchase Intention (PI) | 3 | 0.793 | 0.879 | 0.708 |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Responsiveness | 0.745 | |||||||
| 2. Utility | 0.729 | 0.732 | ||||||
| 3. Friendliness | 0.742 | 0.626 | 0.777 | |||||
| 4. Empathy | 0.738 | 0.584 | 0.639 | 0.836 | ||||
| 5. Anthropomorphism | 0.683 | 0.595 | 0.634 | 0.711 | 0.837 | |||
| 6. Perceived Agency | 0.640 | 0.614 | 0.643 | 0.684 | 0.678 | 0.761 | ||
| 7. Perceived Experience | 0.671 | 0.505 | 0.625 | 0.751 | 0.732 | 0.636 | 0.890 | |
| 8. Purchase Intention | 0.689 | 0.665 | 0.541 | 0.615 | 0.630 | 0.629 | 0.622 | 0.841 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Ji, M. Understanding Consumer Purchase Intention in Virtual Live Streaming: The Moderating Role of Anthropomorphism. Behav. Sci. 2026, 16, 342. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16030342
Ji M. Understanding Consumer Purchase Intention in Virtual Live Streaming: The Moderating Role of Anthropomorphism. Behavioral Sciences. 2026; 16(3):342. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16030342
Chicago/Turabian StyleJi, Man. 2026. "Understanding Consumer Purchase Intention in Virtual Live Streaming: The Moderating Role of Anthropomorphism" Behavioral Sciences 16, no. 3: 342. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16030342
APA StyleJi, M. (2026). Understanding Consumer Purchase Intention in Virtual Live Streaming: The Moderating Role of Anthropomorphism. Behavioral Sciences, 16(3), 342. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16030342
