Next Article in Journal
When Feedback Backfires: Effects of Real-Time Participation Feedback and Group Norm Prompt on Team Creativity in Virtual Workspaces
Previous Article in Journal
What Drives Saudi Gamers? A Study of Gender, Genre, and Geography
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Development and Validation of the Common Prosperity Aspiration Scale: A Mixed-Methods Study in China

1
Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
2
Research Center of Psychology and Social Development, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
3
School of Psychology, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250358, China
4
Key Laboratory of Cognition and Personality (SWU), Ministry of Education, Chongqing 400715, China
5
Center for Studies of Education and Psychology of Ethnic Minorities in Southwest China of Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
6
Collaborative Innovation Team for Children and Adolescent Mental Health, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Behav. Sci. 2026, 16(2), 203; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16020203
Submission received: 28 September 2025 / Revised: 4 December 2025 / Accepted: 26 January 2026 / Published: 30 January 2026

Abstract

Despite the increasing emphasis on residents’ prosperity aspirations in rural development initiatives, the lack of a psychometrically sound measure limits comparability and rigor, as existing studies primarily focus on structural and policy factors influencing community prosperity, with insufficient attention to residents’ psychological processes and subjective experiences. Drawing on community psychology, this study develops and validates a measure of rural residents’ aspirations for common prosperity, integrating personal fulfillment with collective advancement across material and spiritual domains. Employing a three-phase mixed-methods design, Study 1 used in-depth interviews and grounded theory procedures (N = 28) to develop a theoretical model comprising four dimensions: material–individual, material–collective, spiritual–individual, and spiritual–collective. Study 2 generated a 19-item, four-factor scale via exploratory factor analysis and exploratory graph analysis (N = 581). Study 3 confirmed the scale’s second-order factor structure and psychometric properties with confirmatory factor analysis (N = 659). The Common Prosperity Aspiration Scale (CPAS) demonstrated strong reliability and validity across its four dimensions and the overarching second-order factor. This pioneering study elucidates the psychological structure of common prosperity aspirations and provides a psychometrically reliable measure for rural contexts. It serves as a valuable tool to explore their influence on behaviors and promote sustainable community development.
Keywords: common prosperity aspiration; rural development; community psychology; mixed-methods research; scale development common prosperity aspiration; rural development; community psychology; mixed-methods research; scale development

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Duan, H.; Guo, Q.; Han, J.; Chen, N.; Chen, H. Development and Validation of the Common Prosperity Aspiration Scale: A Mixed-Methods Study in China. Behav. Sci. 2026, 16, 203. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16020203

AMA Style

Duan H, Guo Q, Han J, Chen N, Chen H. Development and Validation of the Common Prosperity Aspiration Scale: A Mixed-Methods Study in China. Behavioral Sciences. 2026; 16(2):203. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16020203

Chicago/Turabian Style

Duan, Huicun, Qinglong Guo, Jingfeng Han, Na Chen, and Hong Chen. 2026. "Development and Validation of the Common Prosperity Aspiration Scale: A Mixed-Methods Study in China" Behavioral Sciences 16, no. 2: 203. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16020203

APA Style

Duan, H., Guo, Q., Han, J., Chen, N., & Chen, H. (2026). Development and Validation of the Common Prosperity Aspiration Scale: A Mixed-Methods Study in China. Behavioral Sciences, 16(2), 203. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16020203

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop